Knowledge

Template talk:Western Australian elections

Source 📝

244: 748:
other elections because it has not yet happened and therefore probably should be emphasised. It may be obvious to the reader (if they are WA residents who would presumably know if they had voted already that year or not) or they may need to click through to see what the difference is, a difference that is evident in the first sentence ("will be held on ..."). I notice that we use this italicisation in other templates, e.g. infobox Australian place has fields to show the neighbouring suburbs/localities. If we look at
831: 463: 224: 22: 71: 53: 159: 131: 169: 403:
Don't be obtuse. It's really useful to quickly signify that an election in the template hasn't happened yet. There is absolutely no reason to remove that except that one feels like being argumentative. The consistency argument doesn't work when their usage is completely consistent across all of these
294:
says "Italics ... are used for various specific purposes in Knowledge, outlined below" and then lists the specific purposes, which does not include "future dates". I think that by implication this means that in general italics ought not be used for other purposes, otherwise what's the point of having
756:
is shown as the western neighbour while Peppermint Grove etc (with no italics) are other neighbours. Thus the reader is alerted that the Indian Ocean is different to the other suburb names. This seems to be common practice in these infoboxes. I see no problem with using it in a navbox because it is
747:
says "Emphasis may be used to draw attention to an important word or phrase within a sentence, when the point or thrust of the sentence may otherwise not be apparent to readers, or to stress a contrast". I think this is a situation where we are stressing a contrast. The 2017 election is not like the
361:
using italics for arbitrary purposes defeats the purpose of enumerating specific purposes, reduces the value of italics (because it's harder to know what the italics formatting means in any given usage - especially in this case when there's nothing to tell us what the italics mean) and reduces the
757:
advice about navigation - "you can click on this but it might not be exactly what you are expecting it to be (i.e. a past election)" - if anything, it encourages the reader to be alert to the lede when they read the article that something is not as they might expect.
579:, even more so when I see an attempt has been made to to amend the MOS to prohibit this... Presumably the italics idea developed because other solutions (like the above) weren't considered better (the template looks awful with the superscript). 726:
I possibly should have explained the differences above. Only the 17 will show the pop up. I would have preferred to have the whole 2017 do this but because it is wikilinked the Beta release hover card interferes with the other pop up.
380:
about the contents of the article, such as whether it is in the future. If a reader wants to know if the election has happened yet (ie it is in the future) they will likely read the article to find out.
942:
This makes it clear and explicit, without the reader needing guess what the italics means. At any point in time there should only be one such entry per group, so clutter ought not be a problem.
1001: 835: 467: 925: 797: 557: 429: 1006: 819: 451: 427:. Why use italics at all? A reader has to know what it means. Why not just say say exactly what the info is with superscript or something, and the whole issue just disappears? 1036: 1041: 930: 920: 915: 562: 552: 547: 1021: 413: 1046: 1026: 1031: 96: 78: 58: 608: 358: 310: 866: 498: 575:
I think the fact that this continued beyond the explanation of why italics are used (and have been for a decade or so without complaint) means it already is
1011: 1016: 253: 145: 1051: 861: 856: 851: 493: 488: 483: 233: 141: 876: 508: 332:). What has been done on election year templates for a decade or so is not listed as being prohibited, so I really can't see the problem here. 805: 437: 899: 894: 889: 884: 776:
an ocean is not a suburb/lga per Description column of Template:Infobox Australian place#Parameters and "Suburbs" displayed for type=suburb
531: 526: 521: 516: 795:
If we want to indicate that a particular entry in the list of elections is in the future, why don't we just say so explicitly, ie:
632:
Yes I agree they do not look as pretty, but are we about looking good or providing information. Perhaps the following is better?
843: 622: 590: 475: 343: 198: 185: 136: 370: 778:. If we really want to list the ocean in the navbox, then the navbox should be "fixed" first so it doesn't say "suburb". 749: 409: 33: 602: 405: 762: 243: 39: 984: 966: 951: 787: 766: 736: 627: 595: 390: 348: 322: 304: 947: 783: 386: 318: 300: 617: 585: 338: 758: 194: 957:
I agree - but they did not like the superscript. Why not just state the actual as you say!!
82:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to 830: 462: 980: 962: 732: 174: 90: 223: 943: 779: 382: 314: 296: 612: 580: 576: 424: 333: 281: 70: 52: 995: 744: 607:
You might also want to input into the discussion Mitch has started at the MOS page
366: 329: 328:
The MOS is not exhaustive, and also has a section about when not to use italics (
976: 958: 728: 291: 158: 130: 164: 311:
Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting#Explicitly limit italics usage
94:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
190: 975:
makes all of the above rather LAME ? I wish I had thought of it first.
774:— I suggest that listing an ocean as a suburb is not a good idea because 84: 359:
WT:Manual of Style/Text formatting#Explicitly limit italics usage
801: 433: 15: 242: 222: 972: 775: 641:{{Navbox |name = Western Australian elections |state = 285: 277: 908: 875: 842: 772:
This seems to be common practice in these infoboxes
540: 507: 474: 1002:Template-Class Elections and Referendums articles 189:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 106:Knowledge:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 1007:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles 836:Elections and referendums in Western Australia 468:Elections and referendums in Western Australia 362:consistency of the text formatting in general. 197:. If you would like to participate, visit the 109:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 813: 445: 8: 1037:Template-Class Australian politics articles 1042:NA-importance Australian politics articles 820: 806: 798: 452: 438: 430: 125: 47: 1022:Template-Class Western Australia articles 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 1047:WikiProject Australian politics articles 1027:NA-importance Western Australia articles 651:|title = {{flagicon|Western Australia}} 404:articles, as you yourself acknowledge. 376:", ie they are not intended to provide 127: 49: 1032:WikiProject Western Australia articles 771: 79:WikiProject Elections and Referendums 76:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 7: 38:It is of interest to the following 703:|group3 = Referendums |list3 = * 112:Elections and Referendums articles 14: 1012:Template-Class Australia articles 1017:NA-importance Australia articles 829: 752:(a coastal suburb), we see that 461: 167: 157: 129: 69: 51: 20: 254:WikiProject Australian politics 207:Knowledge:WikiProject Australia 1052:WikiProject Australia articles 251:This template is supported by 231:This template is supported by 210:Template:WikiProject Australia 1: 655:|listclass = hlist |group1 = 371:Navigation templates provide 234:WikiProject Western Australia 985:10:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC) 967:13:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 952:13:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 788:13:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 767:00:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 750:Cottesloe, Western Australia 737:11:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 628:13:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC) 596:13:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC) 414:08:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC) 391:07:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC) 349:03:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 323:03:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 305:02:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 181:Western Australian elections 1068: 250: 230: 152: 103:Elections and Referendums 64: 59:Elections and Referendums 46: 639: 195:Australia-related topics 183:is within the scope of 675:17|To be held DD MMM}} 247: 227: 877:Upper House elections 509:Upper House elections 423:This could end up as 278:my removal of italics 246: 226: 186:WikiProject Australia 357:As I pointed out at 295:MOS:ITALICS at all? 862:2017 (not held yet) 646:state|autocollapse 248: 228: 213:Australia articles 34:content assessment 939: 938: 844:General elections 603:The Drover's Wife 571: 570: 476:General elections 406:The Drover's Wife 269: 268: 265: 264: 261: 260: 142:Western Australia 124: 123: 120: 119: 1059: 834: 833: 822: 815: 808: 799: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 647: 644: 625: 620: 615: 606: 593: 588: 583: 466: 465: 454: 447: 440: 431: 346: 341: 336: 215: 214: 211: 208: 205: 177: 175:Australia portal 172: 171: 170: 161: 154: 153: 148: 133: 126: 114: 113: 110: 107: 104: 97:our project page 91:electoral reform 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 25: 24: 23: 16: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1058: 1057: 1056: 992: 991: 940: 935: 904: 871: 838: 828: 826: 743:My 10c is that 721: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 645: 642: 623: 618: 613: 600: 591: 586: 581: 572: 567: 536: 503: 470: 460: 458: 344: 339: 334: 274: 212: 209: 206: 203: 202: 173: 168: 166: 139: 111: 108: 105: 102: 101: 12: 11: 5: 1065: 1063: 1055: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1004: 994: 993: 990: 989: 988: 987: 937: 936: 934: 933: 928: 923: 918: 912: 910: 906: 905: 903: 902: 897: 892: 887: 881: 879: 873: 872: 870: 869: 864: 859: 854: 848: 846: 840: 839: 827: 825: 824: 817: 810: 802: 793: 792: 791: 790: 741: 740: 739: 671:{{finedetail | 640: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 569: 568: 566: 565: 560: 555: 550: 544: 542: 538: 537: 535: 534: 529: 524: 519: 513: 511: 505: 504: 502: 501: 496: 491: 486: 480: 478: 472: 471: 459: 457: 456: 449: 442: 434: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 396: 395: 394: 393: 363: 352: 351: 273: 270: 267: 266: 263: 262: 259: 258: 249: 239: 238: 229: 219: 218: 216: 179: 178: 162: 150: 149: 134: 122: 121: 118: 117: 115: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1064: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 999: 997: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 956: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 932: 929: 927: 924: 922: 919: 917: 914: 913: 911: 907: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 886: 883: 882: 880: 878: 874: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 849: 847: 845: 841: 837: 832: 823: 818: 816: 811: 809: 804: 803: 800: 796: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 770: 769: 768: 764: 760: 755: 751: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 725: 724: 723: 722: 631: 630: 629: 626: 621: 616: 610: 604: 599: 598: 597: 594: 589: 584: 578: 574: 573: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 549: 546: 545: 543: 539: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 514: 512: 510: 506: 500: 497: 495: 492: 490: 487: 485: 482: 481: 479: 477: 473: 469: 464: 455: 450: 448: 443: 441: 436: 435: 432: 428: 426: 415: 411: 407: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 392: 388: 384: 379: 375: 374: 368: 365:According to 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 353: 350: 347: 342: 337: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 312: 307: 306: 302: 298: 293: 289: 287: 283: 279: 271: 256: 255: 245: 241: 240: 236: 235: 225: 221: 220: 217: 200: 196: 192: 188: 187: 182: 176: 165: 163: 160: 156: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 135: 132: 128: 116: 99: 98: 93: 92: 87: 86: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 941: 867:by-elections 812: 794: 754:Indian Ocean 753: 745:MOS:EMPHASIS 659:|list1 = * 499:by-elections 444: 422: 377: 372: 330:MOS:NOITALIC 308: 290: 275: 252: 232: 199:project page 184: 180: 95: 89: 83: 77: 40:WikiProjects 29: 909:Referendums 541:Referendums 378:information 292:MOS:ITALICS 996:Categories 944:Mitch Ames 780:Mitch Ames 687:|list2 = * 683:|group2 = 383:Mitch Ames 373:navigation 315:Mitch Ames 309:See also: 297:Mitch Ames 973:this edit 286:reversion 282:Number 57 204:Australia 191:Australia 137:Australia 85:elections 971:I think 146:Politics 30:template 577:WP:LAME 425:WP:LAME 272:italics 977:Aoziwe 959:Aoziwe 729:Aoziwe 614:Number 582:Number 335:Number 36:scale. 759:Kerry 367:WP:NA 28:This 981:talk 963:talk 948:talk 931:2009 926:2005 921:1992 916:1984 900:1898 895:1897 890:1896 885:1894 857:2013 852:2008 784:talk 763:talk 733:talk 609:here 563:2009 558:2005 553:1992 548:1984 532:1898 527:1897 522:1896 517:1894 494:2017 489:2013 484:2008 410:talk 387:talk 319:talk 301:talk 288:... 280:and 193:and 719:}} 649:}}} 643:{{{ 284:'s 276:Re 998:: 983:) 965:) 950:) 786:) 765:) 735:) 677:'' 669:'' 611:. 412:) 389:) 321:) 313:. 303:) 144:/ 140:: 88:, 979:( 961:( 946:( 821:e 814:t 807:v 782:( 761:( 731:( 717:] 715:* 713:] 711:* 709:] 707:* 705:] 701:] 699:* 697:] 695:* 693:] 691:* 689:] 685:] 681:] 679:* 673:] 667:* 665:] 663:* 661:] 657:] 653:] 624:7 619:5 605:: 601:@ 592:7 587:5 453:e 446:t 439:v 408:( 385:( 369:" 345:7 340:5 317:( 299:( 257:. 237:. 201:. 100:. 42::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Elections and Referendums
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Elections and Referendums
elections
electoral reform
our project page
WikiProject icon
Australia
Western Australia
Politics
WikiProject icon
Australia portal
WikiProject Australia
Australia
Australia-related topics
project page
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Western Australia
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Australian politics
my removal of italics
Number 57
reversion
MOS:ITALICS
Mitch Ames
talk
02:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.