25:
168:
made a particular decision after contemplating a well-defined set of circumstances. It is assumed that evaluating any given set of circumstances under a legal test will lead to an unambiguous and repeatable result.
338:
349:
232:
497:
464:
674:
645:
612:
522:
485:
108:
477:
448:
428:
269:
473:
490:
387:
397:
244:
46:
392:
322:
250:
89:
544:
42:
160:
Tests are often formulated from the logical analysis of a judicial decision or a court order where it appears that a
61:
566:
35:
68:
617:
581:
561:
374:
75:
627:
556:
364:
195:
696:
622:
469:
57:
701:
640:
369:
200:
670:
601:
146:
596:
571:
317:
178:
150:
502:
220:
154:
142:
183:
161:
82:
690:
634:
205:
138:
130:
539:
443:
438:
402:
330:
591:
510:
410:
359:
258:
24:
606:
586:
534:
459:
423:
418:
354:
298:
282:
240:
16:
Commonly applied method of evaluation used to resolve matters of jurisprudence
576:
433:
310:
305:
290:
277:
129:
is a commonly applied method of evaluation used to resolve matters of
165:
134:
122:
18:
157:
may hinge on the application of one or more legal tests.
465:
Test for inducement or contributory patent infringement
49:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
456:Test for new principle of fundamental justice
327:Internal Necessities Test or Artistic Defense
8:
646:McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework
486:Test for peace, order, and good government
444:Test for the inclusion of hearsay evidence
109:Learn how and when to remove this message
453:Test for material causation/contribution
657:
562:Calculus of negligence test (Hand rule)
266:Community Standards of Tolerance test
7:
388:Real and Substantial Connection test
318:Integral to Distinctive Culture test
47:adding citations to reliable sources
517:European Convention on Human Rights
255:Central management and control test
667:Responsibility in Law and Morality
274:Degradation or Dehumanization Test
14:
613:Reasonable expectation of privacy
523:Necessary in a democratic society
545:Wednesbury unreasonableness test
23:
609:(an element of the Miller test)
491:R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd
350:Necessarily incidental doctrine
34:needs additional citations for
460:Test for Infringement of Title
439:Test for exclusion of evidence
1:
482:Test for patent infringement
365:Patent unreasonableness test
323:Interjurisdictional immunity
149:, the resolution of certain
633:Wambaugh's inversion test.
718:
567:Consumer expectations test
478:Frustrate the purpose test
474:Express contradiction test
419:Test for Aboriginal Title
381:Provincial Inability test
251:Assumed Jurisdiction test
618:Clear and present danger
582:Imminent lawless action
498:Void for Vagueness test
393:Reasonableness Standard
370:Pith and substance test
201:Habitual residence test
133:. In the context of a
628:Shocks the conscience
557:Aguilar-Spinelli test
470:Tests for paramountcy
384:Purpose and form test
306:Indecent conduct test
196:Berne three-step test
665:Cane, Peter (2002).
652:Notes and references
639:Sherbert test. see:
449:Test for materiality
346:Multiple Access test
173:Kinds of legal tests
145:, or other kinds of
43:improve this article
669:. Hart Publishing.
635:see: Obiter dictum.
278:Denial of Bail test
241:Air of reality test
641:Sherbert v. Verner
434:Test for detention
429:Test for confusion
602:Risk-utility test
190:International law
151:questions of fact
147:legal proceedings
119:
118:
111:
93:
709:
681:
680:
662:
597:Mt. Healthy test
572:Daubert standard
360:Overbreadth test
179:Bright-line rule
114:
107:
103:
100:
94:
92:
51:
27:
19:
717:
716:
712:
711:
710:
708:
707:
706:
687:
686:
685:
684:
677:
664:
663:
659:
654:
553:
531:
519:
375:R v Morgentaler
229:
217:
192:
175:
115:
104:
98:
95:
58:"Test" law
52:
50:
40:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
715:
713:
705:
704:
699:
689:
688:
683:
682:
675:
656:
655:
653:
650:
649:
648:
643:
637:
631:
625:
620:
615:
610:
604:
599:
594:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
564:
559:
552:
549:
548:
547:
542:
537:
530:
529:United Kingdom
527:
526:
525:
518:
515:
514:
513:
508:
500:
495:
483:
480:
467:
462:
457:
454:
451:
446:
441:
436:
431:
426:
421:
416:
408:
400:
395:
390:
385:
382:
379:
367:
362:
357:
352:
347:
344:
336:
328:
325:
320:
315:
303:
288:
280:
275:
272:
267:
264:
256:
253:
248:
238:
228:
225:
224:
223:
221:"But-for" test
216:
213:
212:
211:
203:
198:
191:
188:
187:
186:
184:Balancing test
181:
174:
171:
162:finder of fact
117:
116:
99:September 2020
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
714:
703:
700:
698:
695:
694:
692:
678:
676:1-84113-321-3
672:
668:
661:
658:
651:
647:
644:
642:
638:
636:
632:
629:
626:
624:
621:
619:
616:
614:
611:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
560:
558:
555:
554:
551:United States
550:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
532:
528:
524:
521:
520:
516:
512:
509:
507:
505:
501:
499:
496:
493:
492:
487:
484:
481:
479:
475:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
427:
425:
424:Test for bias
422:
420:
417:
415:
413:
409:
407:
405:
401:
399:
398:Sheppard Test
396:
394:
391:
389:
386:
383:
380:
377:
376:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
345:
343:
341:
337:
335:
333:
329:
326:
324:
321:
319:
316:
313:
312:
307:
304:
301:
300:
295:
293:
289:
287:
285:
281:
279:
276:
273:
271:
268:
265:
263:
261:
257:
254:
252:
249:
246:
242:
239:
237:
235:
231:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
214:
210:
208:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
193:
189:
185:
182:
180:
177:
176:
172:
170:
167:
163:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
131:jurisprudence
128:
124:
113:
110:
102:
91:
88:
84:
81:
77:
74:
70:
67:
63:
60: –
59:
55:
54:Find sources:
48:
44:
38:
37:
32:This article
30:
26:
21:
20:
666:
660:
623:Bad tendency
540:Hicklin test
511:Wigmore Test
503:
489:
411:
403:
373:
339:
331:
309:
297:
291:
283:
259:
245:R v Fontaine
233:
206:
159:
126:
120:
105:
96:
86:
79:
72:
65:
53:
41:Please help
36:verification
33:
697:Legal tests
592:Miller test
270:Conway Test
702:Common law
691:Categories
607:SLAPS test
587:Lemon test
535:Bolam test
504:Waterfield
488:(see also
372:(see also
355:Oakes test
308:(see also
299:R v Suberu
296:(see also
243:(see also
215:Common law
69:newspapers
577:Frye test
311:R v Kouri
143:discovery
404:Smithers
207:Caroline
412:Sparrow
332:Meiorin
260:Collins
234:Andrews
164:or the
139:hearing
83:scholar
673:
476:&
284:Gladue
227:Canada
85:
78:
71:
64:
56:
292:Grant
166:court
135:trial
90:JSTOR
76:books
671:ISBN
630:test
506:Test
414:test
406:test
342:test
334:test
294:Test
286:Test
262:Test
236:test
209:test
137:, a
127:test
125:, a
62:news
340:Law
155:law
153:or
123:law
121:In
45:by
693::
472:–
141:,
679:.
494:)
378:)
314:)
302:)
247:)
112:)
106:(
101:)
97:(
87:·
80:·
73:·
66:·
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
