343:, Archdeacon of Surrey's 1628 essay in defense of Modernist convictions. There Hakewill argues against both the common belief that the Universe was in constant decay and the Renaissance portrayal of Ancients as superior to Moderns. Moderns were traditionally depicted in architecture and other arts even prior to the seventeenth century as dwarfs on the shoulders of Ancient giants. Hakewill stated "we are all of one stature, save that we are lifted up somewhat higher by their means". Gould argues that "nearly all founders of the Scientific Revolution revered the great sources of Antiquity. ...The ranks of the Modernists did not include only the new scientific scholars, but also encompassed many prominent intellectuals from literary and other humanistic callings, including the theologian Hakewell."
339:, which stated that their scientific treatise did not pay undue attention to literary style and utilized methods of direct observation and validation of factual accuracy, in contrast to Renaissance compendia. Such statements of worth were necessary to receive recognition for progress in scientific methodology, but were not made to denigrate the humanities. Statements such as Isaac Newton's less than original "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." was recognition not only of other previous leaders in the Scientific Revolution, but of the Ancients who provided foundations in the sciences and humanities. Gould cites
448:. Most of Gould's contacts with colleagues revealed that they were unaware of the science war debate. This, he believes is detrimental to the working professional scientist, who would benefit from constructive criticism and insightful analysis originating outside of the sciences, and from gaining a historical perspective of their profession. He also argued that most social critics and historians of science that he was aware of were not pure relativists, and agreed that there is an external reality that may be scientifically modeled with associated benefits of acquired knowledge and applications.
572:
the independent humanities. He shows
Whewell's consilience to be a literal "jumping together" in the mind of diverse facts or phenomenon initially appearing as unrelated and that such simplification and unification under the higher generality of only one theory merits the classification as probable truth and deserves further investigation and testing. But Gould stresses that Whewell defended steadfastly, the separate and independent domains or magisteria, in particular the independence of theology and ethics, citing Whewell's 1833
305:. Renaissance compendiums of knowledge did not necessarily discriminate between truth by observation and the mythological or fictional realm. Both were domains of human opinion and thought regarded as noteworthy, especially when associated with authoritative classical sources, and distinguishing differences between fact and opinion was not always valued above providing readers with complete documentation. Leaders of the Scientific Revolution, being the new kids on the block with respect to the established
373:(NOMA) of science and religion, and repeats that book's argument (which he does not claim to be the first to pen) that "Science tries to record and explain the factual character of the natural world, whereas religion struggles with spiritual and ethical questions about the meaning and proper conduct of our lives. The facts of nature simply cannot dictate correct moral behavior or spiritual meaning." He cites
413:, and his later reevaluation and concessions with respect to the initial presentation. Snow's initial assumption is that the salvation of underdeveloped countries depends solely on the import, training and development of scientists and engineers in order for these countries to rise economically and eliminate disparities peaceably by the year 2000. Gould argues that Snow reverses his position in 1963 with
22:
309:, were forced to emphasize the value of their enterprise in order to receive resources or merit for their investigations. This meant contrasting their methods and goals with that of the established scholars. They did meet with resistance, but many of the religious scholars accepted the newly discovered knowledge of the Scientific Revolution as valid.
128:
576:
Therein, Whewell defends realms of human pursuit beyond and outside of the physical sciences that are true and consistent with any truths of science, and stem from one creation and God, but are based upon different foundations and methodologies. Gould extends this defense to the humanities in general
571:
Gould goes on to portray Wilson's extension (and according to him, a misleading divergent extension) of the original meaning behind
Whewell's concept of "consilience of inductions" into a philosophy of all consuming reductionism in diametric opposition to Whewell's, and as an inapt attempt to subsume
440:. He goes on to argue that the science wars are without true combatants in that the vast majority of working scientists are generally too busy and unconcerned to read current valid contributions to science studies, or even to read recognized leaders in the field from the previous generation, such as
289:
have been characterized falsely. In each case the strategy for either side has been to portray centrist members of the opposing camp with radical minority views of extremist straw men so as to easily defeat these misrepresentations of otherwise rational mainstream arguments. He stresses the dangers
362:
as representative of the period. He describes Draper's work as describing the Roman
Catholic religion as incompatible with science while the liberal American Protestantism was compatible with science. White wrote that scientific investigation was good for genuine religion. Gould cites his own book,
542:
which cannot be predicted from knowledge of properties of the components, or of laws governing at the level of those components alone. Thus reductionism can only fail in attempts to model, explain, or describe such systems, and we must search for and depend upon new emergent principles embedded in
421:
The fourth period poses the postmodern relativists against the scientific realists or "postmodern" scholars in the humanities and social-science departments of
American Universities... against researchers in the conventional science departments of the same institutions." The booty being funding,
275:
about the crafty cunning fox that devises many strategies versus the persistent hedgehog who knows one effective strategy, Gould offers a study of the division between the two ways of knowing, attempting to debunk the commonly assumed inextricable conflict between science and the arts as the two
387:
that the world was flat, when in reality they were arguing actually that the circumference of the known spherical world was much larger than
Columbus was assuming. Gould also refers to the misrepresentation of Galileo's trial as unjust though it was a result of Galileo's conscious undiplomatic
417:
and acknowledges that the original motivating assumption of "dichotomous parsing of intellectual life into contrarian literary and scientific camps" was not a true representation and Snow was sorry for having failed to recognize a third culture in the continuous spectrum of intellectual life.
567:
our species, remain more within the narrative realm of the sciences of historical contingency than within the traditional, and potentially reductionist, domain of repeated and predictable natural phenomenon generated by laws of nature."
284:
Gould prefers to focus on the commonalities between the humanities and the sciences, such as creative thinking and the psychology of transcendence and discovery. He discusses four historic periods in which the supposed
577:
and argues that a union of equals allying the sciences and humanities requires independence and mutual respect, not a hierarchy in which the humanities are subsumed under a reductionist framework of physical science.
543:
higher, more complex levels. He also indicates that the historical contingency in some systems may cause effects that do not necessarily strictly follow a single path from identified causes and therefore may require
39:
383:
as showing that some supporters of the science vs. religion model misrepresent historical religious advocates. One example is the caricatures of
Spanish scholars as theologians arguing against
466:
within the larger scope of his recommendations for a confederation of the physical sciences and humanities. He also provides an exegesis of texts participating in the development of the word
920:
290:
of presenting cut and dried dichotomies, such as good vs. bad or spirit vs. matter, or focusing on polar positions within continuous ranges of actions, methods, discourse and beliefs.
559:
not only as something special (which I surely do not deny), but also as something ordained, necessary, or at the very least, predictable from some form of general process... But if
997:
499:
Gould proclaims
William Whewell to be "the first modernist with joint command of both history and philosophy in the analysis of science" (Whewell being best known for his 1837
563:
represents more of a contingent and improbable fact of history than an apotheosis of a predictable tendency, then our peculiarities, even though they be universal
547:
drawn from historical analysis and the humanities rather that classical deductive mathematical formulas prescribing necessarily linear consequences. He highlights
86:
58:
65:
591:
492:
72:
297:
in the seventeenth century, the vast majority of whom had sincere religious convictions. Atheism was extremely rare among these scholars. In the
54:
202:
555:
as a primary example of how entities such as ourselves are not a necessary, but rather a contingent product, "we have preferred to think of
1028:
301:, which preceded the period under consideration, scholars focused on the recovery of lost knowledge with an associated reverence for the
1074:
1054:
972:
876:
105:
910:
79:
1059:
1049:
43:
328:, who accepted God's occasional intervention, criticized Burnet for not recognizing God's option for miracles. Gould cites
1023:
1002:
422:
power, ownership of concepts or factual truth, accolades for progress, and influence. He argues that most readings of the
1069:
224:
346:
Gould's stage two is the misrepresentation of late nineteenth century's rationalism vs. religion conflict. Gould cites
272:
967:
842:
1064:
951:
925:
824:
370:
127:
741:
History of
Scientific Ideas: Being the First Part of The Philosophy of the ... - William Whewell - Google Boeken
636:
Concerning the burning of the world, and
Concerning the new heavens and new ... - Thomas Burnet - Google Boeken
597:
393:
379:
815:
507:.). Gould also reminds the reader that he revived Whewell's concept of consilience in print, prior to Wilson.
324:
argued that God created a clockwork world with physical laws that did not require miracles or tampering with.
830:
787:
Astronomy and general physics considered with reference to natural theology - William
Whewell - Google Boeken
977:
32:
992:
982:
900:
374:
915:
905:
869:
294:
534:
or non-additive systems. He indicates that there exist new entities, properties, and interactions that
764:
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded Upon Their History - William Whewell - Google Boeken
987:
384:
355:
835:
347:
302:
847:
462:
659:
History of the conflict between religion and science 1897 - John William Draper - Google Boeken
962:
886:
709:
552:
335:
254:
209:
197:
138:
862:
718:
608:
531:
486:
409:
235:
586:
539:
481:
473:
437:
389:
340:
313:
257:
544:
680:"History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom by White - Free Ebook"
1043:
1007:
930:
602:
365:
317:
306:
819:
511:
457:
423:
404:
325:
286:
701:
785:
762:
739:
657:
634:
519:
468:
445:
441:
428:
298:
21:
723:
613:
527:
523:
433:
400:
265:
854:
548:
515:
472:
within a larger historical context of the concept's inception by Reverend
216:
329:
261:
156:
679:
505:
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded Upon Their History
316:
day that valued the new methods. He also cites theologian Reverend
260:
volume exploring the historically complex relationship between the
432:(for not having consulted an expert in physics to "peer review"
360:
A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom
858:
574:
Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Natural Theology.
15:
210:
426:
misinterpret the carelessness of individual editors of the
236:
484:
in an anonymous 1834 review of her publication in the
293:
The first period is represented by the leaders of the
312:
Gould refers to some of the Roman Catholic clergy in
352:
History of the Conflict Between Science and Religion
276:
falsely opposed realms of the pursuit of knowledge.
1016:
944:
893:
234:
222:
208:
196:
188:
180:
170:
162:
152:
144:
134:
121:Mending the Gap Between Science and the Humanities
46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
998:Leonardo's Mountain of Clams and the Diet of Worms
436:article) as a condemnation of the entire field of
514:by utilizing two main arguments based upon the
119:The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox:
55:"The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox"
936:The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox
870:
250:The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox
8:
118:
476:, who also is said to have coined the term
877:
863:
855:
126:
117:
722:
592:Relationship between religion and science
493:On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
369:as evidence for the independence of the
625:
399:The third period is represented by the
7:
1029:The Structure of Evolutionary Theory
44:adding citations to reliable sources
510:Gould reproves Wilson's program of
463:Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge
14:
501:History of the Inductive Sciences
702:"Scientist: The story of a word"
20:
415:The Two Cultures: A Second Look
31:needs additional citations for
456:Gould includes an analysis of
1:
1003:The Lying Stones of Marrakech
656:Draper, John William (1878).
973:Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes
682:. Gutenberg.org. 1996-04-01
1091:
1075:Books by Stephen Jay Gould
1055:American non-fiction books
926:Questioning the Millennium
911:Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle
839:, April 6, 2003, Page BW15
371:non-overlapping magisteria
322:Sacred Theory of the Earth
268:in a scholarly discourse.
816:The Mismeasure of Science
784:Whewell, William (1833).
761:Whewell, William (1847).
738:Whewell, William (1858).
724:10.1080/00033796200202722
125:
845:by Christine Kenneally,
598:The Hedgehog and the Fox
380:Inventing the Flat Earth
633:Burnet, Thomas (1722).
280:Four historical periods
1060:English-language books
1050:2003 non-fiction books
1024:Ontogeny and Phylogeny
993:Dinosaur in a Haystack
983:Bully for Brontosaurus
901:An Urchin in the Storm
356:Andrew Dickson White's
332:'s preface in 1678 to
906:The Mismeasure of Man
700:Ross, Sydney (1962).
295:Scientific Revolution
988:Eight Little Piggies
978:The Flamingo's Smile
40:improve this article
1070:Fictional hedgehogs
836:The Washington Post
334:The Ornithology of
255:Stephen Jay Gould's
122:
848:The New York Times
833:by Michael Dirda,
388:ridiculing of the
1065:Books about foxes
1037:
1036:
968:The Panda's Thumb
963:Ever Since Darwin
946:Essay collections
887:Stephen Jay Gould
710:Annals of Science
553:natural selection
545:narrative methods
503:and for his 1840
394:Copernican debate
336:Francis Willughby
273:the Greek proverb
246:
245:
242:Q175.55 .G68 2003
203:978-0-609-60140-2
181:Publication place
139:Stephen Jay Gould
116:
115:
108:
90:
1082:
955:
879:
872:
865:
856:
798:
797:
795:
794:
781:
775:
774:
772:
771:
758:
752:
751:
749:
748:
735:
729:
728:
726:
706:
697:
691:
690:
688:
687:
676:
670:
669:
667:
666:
653:
647:
646:
644:
643:
630:
609:The Two Cultures
487:Quarterly Review
410:The Two Cultures
392:position in the
238:
212:
172:Publication date
130:
123:
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1033:
1012:
956:
952:Natural History
948:
947:
940:
889:
883:
851:, June 15, 2003
825:Natural History
807:
802:
801:
792:
790:
783:
782:
778:
769:
767:
760:
759:
755:
746:
744:
737:
736:
732:
704:
699:
698:
694:
685:
683:
678:
677:
673:
664:
662:
655:
654:
650:
641:
639:
632:
631:
627:
622:
587:Conflict thesis
583:
540:complex systems
482:Mary Somerville
474:William Whewell
454:
438:science studies
341:George Hakewill
282:
227:
189:Media type
173:
120:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
1088:
1086:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1042:
1041:
1035:
1034:
1032:
1031:
1026:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
959:
957:
945:
942:
941:
939:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
916:Wonderful Life
913:
908:
903:
897:
895:
891:
890:
884:
882:
881:
874:
867:
859:
853:
852:
843:Books in brief
840:
828:
812:
811:
806:
805:External links
803:
800:
799:
776:
753:
730:
692:
671:
648:
624:
623:
621:
618:
617:
616:
605:
594:
589:
582:
579:
526:found in some
458:E. O. Wilson's
453:
450:
375:J. B. Russel's
281:
278:
244:
243:
240:
232:
231:
228:
223:
220:
219:
214:
206:
205:
200:
194:
193:
190:
186:
185:
182:
178:
177:
174:
171:
168:
167:
164:
160:
159:
154:
150:
149:
146:
142:
141:
136:
132:
131:
114:
113:
96:September 2022
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1087:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1009:
1008:I Have Landed
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
960:
958:
954:
953:
943:
937:
934:
932:
931:Rocks of Ages
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
898:
896:
892:
888:
880:
875:
873:
868:
866:
861:
860:
857:
850:
849:
844:
841:
838:
837:
832:
829:
827:
826:
821:
817:
814:
813:
809:
808:
804:
789:
788:
780:
777:
766:
765:
757:
754:
743:
742:
734:
731:
725:
720:
716:
712:
711:
703:
696:
693:
681:
675:
672:
661:
660:
652:
649:
638:
637:
629:
626:
619:
615:
611:
610:
606:
604:
603:Isaiah Berlin
600:
599:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
584:
580:
578:
575:
569:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
506:
502:
497:
495:
494:
489:
488:
483:
479:
475:
471:
470:
465:
464:
459:
451:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
430:
425:
419:
416:
412:
411:
406:
402:
397:
395:
391:
386:
382:
381:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:Rocks of Ages
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:J.W. Draper's
344:
342:
338:
337:
331:
327:
323:
320:, whose 1680
319:
318:Thomas Burnet
315:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
288:
279:
277:
274:
269:
267:
263:
259:
256:
252:
251:
241:
239:
237:LC Class
233:
229:
226:
225:Dewey Decimal
221:
218:
215:
213:
207:
204:
201:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:United States
183:
179:
175:
169:
166:Harmony Books
165:
161:
158:
155:
151:
147:
143:
140:
137:
133:
129:
124:
110:
107:
99:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
950:
935:
846:
834:
823:
820:Michael Ruse
791:. Retrieved
786:
779:
768:. Retrieved
763:
756:
745:. Retrieved
740:
733:
717:(2): 65–85.
714:
708:
695:
684:. Retrieved
674:
663:. Retrieved
658:
651:
640:. Retrieved
635:
628:
607:
596:
573:
570:
564:
561:Homo sapiens
560:
557:Homo sapiens
556:
535:
512:reductionism
509:
504:
500:
498:
491:
485:
480:to refer to
477:
467:
461:
455:
434:Alan Sokal's
427:
424:Sokal affair
420:
414:
408:
405:Rede Lecture
401:C. P. Snow's
398:
378:
364:
359:
351:
345:
333:
326:Isaac Newton
321:
311:
292:
287:Science Wars
283:
270:
249:
248:
247:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
38:Please help
33:verification
30:
831:Book review
520:contingency
469:consilience
452:Consilience
446:Karl Popper
442:Thomas Kuhn
429:Social Text
307:scholastics
299:Renaissance
230:303.48/3 21
1044:Categories
921:Full House
793:2013-10-11
770:2013-10-11
747:2013-10-11
686:2013-10-11
665:2013-10-11
642:2013-10-11
620:References
614:C. P. Snow
524:randomness
271:Employing
266:humanities
258:posthumous
253:(2003) is
66:newspapers
1017:Technical
885:Books by
549:evolution
532:nonlinear
516:emergence
490:, titled
478:scientist
314:Galileo's
217:298587266
163:Publisher
581:See also
538:in some
385:Columbus
330:John Ray
303:Ancients
264:and the
262:sciences
145:Language
894:General
810:Reviews
528:complex
157:Science
153:Subject
148:English
80:scholar
565:within
536:emerge
390:Pope's
135:Author
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
949:from
818:– by
705:(PDF)
460:book
403:1959
377:1991
358:1896
350:1874
192:Print
87:JSTOR
73:books
518:and
354:and
211:OCLC
198:ISBN
176:2003
59:news
719:doi
612:by
601:by
551:by
522:or
444:or
42:by
1046::
822:,
715:18
713:.
707:.
530:,
496:.
407:,
396:.
878:e
871:t
864:v
796:.
773:.
750:.
727:.
721::
689:.
668:.
645:.
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
