97:. The agreement between data and the numerical rule should be no surprise, as we have deliberately chosen the rule to match the data. If we are concerned about what Bode's law tells us about the cause system of planetary distribution then we demand confirmation that will not be available until better information about other planetary systems becomes available.
42:
will not be available. More specifically, it involves the analysis of a finite natural phenomenon for which it is difficult to overcome the problem of using a common sample of
59:
257:
252:
227:
141:
234:
Much of science also falls under John Tukey's label "uncomfortable science," because real repetition is not feasible or practical.
128:(1985). "Theories of data analysis: from magical thinking through classical statistics". In Hoaglin, D.C; et al. (eds.).
51:
47:
89:(exploratory data analysis), there are not enough planets remaining for a rigorous and independent test of the
27:
31:
223:
196:
137:
186:
178:
106:
82:
66:
55:
216:
191:
166:
130:
246:
74:
39:
20:
125:
112:
94:
90:
23:
200:
182:
70:
69:, which provides a simple numerical rule for the distances of the
86:
43:
35:
167:"The self-assessment trap: Can we all be better than average?"
78:
93:(confirmatory data analysis). We have exhausted the natural
26:, comprises situations in which there is a need to draw an
215:
129:
165:Norel, R.; Rice, J. J.; Stolovitzky, G. (2011).
38:, where further samples influenced by the same
81:. Once the rule has been derived, through the
8:
85:matching of various rules with the observed
190:
109:for an extreme example of this phenomenon
60:testing hypotheses suggested by the data
218:Exploring Data Tables Trends and Shapes
157:
132:Exploring Data Tables Trends and Shapes
7:
214:Hoaglin, D.C; et al. (eds.).
14:
258:Statistical hypothesis testing
54:. This leads to the danger of
1:
274:
52:confirmatory data analysis
171:Molecular Systems Biology
48:exploratory data analysis
253:Philosophy of statistics
65:A typical example is
17:Uncomfortable science
183:10.1038/msb.2011.70
19:, as identified by
265:
237:
236:
221:
211:
205:
204:
194:
162:
147:
135:
273:
272:
268:
267:
266:
264:
263:
262:
243:
242:
241:
240:
230:
213:
212:
208:
164:
163:
159:
154:
144:
124:
121:
107:Cosmic variance
103:
83:trial and error
56:systematic bias
30:from a limited
12:
11:
5:
271:
269:
261:
260:
255:
245:
244:
239:
238:
228:
206:
156:
155:
153:
150:
149:
148:
142:
120:
117:
116:
115:
110:
102:
99:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
270:
259:
256:
254:
251:
250:
248:
235:
231:
229:0-471-09776-4
225:
220:
219:
210:
207:
202:
198:
193:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
161:
158:
151:
145:
143:0-471-09776-4
139:
134:
133:
127:
123:
122:
118:
114:
111:
108:
105:
104:
100:
98:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
63:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
233:
217:
209:
174:
170:
160:
131:
126:Diaconis, P.
119:Bibliography
75:Solar System
64:
40:cause system
21:statistician
16:
15:
113:Data mining
247:Categories
152:References
91:hypothesis
67:Bode's law
24:John Tukey
222:. Wiley.
136:. Wiley.
95:phenomena
77:from the
46:for both
28:inference
201:21988833
101:See also
58:through
192:3261704
177:: 537.
73:in the
71:planets
226:
199:
189:
140:
32:sample
224:ISBN
197:PMID
138:ISBN
87:data
50:and
44:data
36:data
187:PMC
179:doi
79:Sun
34:of
249::
232:.
195:.
185:.
173:.
169:.
62:.
203:.
181::
175:7
146:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.