Knowledge (XXG)

Crime against nature

Source 📝

116:) was not included, though mainly because that practice was virtually unknown when the common-law definition was established (it remained so rare that first attempted fellatio prosecutions under the "crime against nature" statute date to 1817 in England and 1893 in the United States.) Likewise, sexual activities between two women were not covered. Over time, particularly starting in the early 20th century, some jurisdictions started enacting statutes or developing precedents the extended the scope of the crime to include fellatio and, sometimes, other sexual activities. 160:, with words "crime against nature" substituted for "vice of buggery" in the original, and it was present in one of these forms in criminal codes of most U.S. states. Specific acts included under this heading were typically deemed too detestable to list them explicitly, resulting in a number of vagueness-based legal challenges to corresponding statutes. One of the most recent, and one of the rare successful challenges, is the 1971 Florida case of 137:
necessary for convictions for buggery and rape. The crime was not limited to same-sex activities, and, in case of an act between two adults, both participants were guilty, regardless of consent. Attempted or completed act of sodomy, committed by a husband against his wife, was grounds for divorce in common law.
181:
Penalties for this offense varied greatly over time and between jurisdictions. Crime against nature remained punishable by death or life imprisonment both in the UK and in many U.S. states well into the 19th century. Liberalization of sexual morals led to reduction of penalties or decriminalization
136:
Until the early 19th century, courts were divided on whether the act needed to be completed (to result in ejaculation) in order to be a punishable offense. This question was deemed sufficiently important that, in 1828, English law was explicitly amended to specify that proof of ejaculation was not
377:
and provides for a penalty of up to ten years in prison. The Supreme Court of Sri Lanka ruled that the law itself is non-enforcable as it violates the constitution. However, in contrast to many other courts, the Supreme Court cannot strike down articles but only interpret them. Hence, the law is
337:, the US Supreme Court held that nonremunerative sex between consenting adults in private was protected by the Constitution and could not be criminalized under "crimes against nature" laws. Thus, fellatio, cunnilingus and anal sex can no longer fall within the scope of such laws. 468:
1814 (January Term, 1814) (Vanduzer accused Andrews of having had connection with a cow and then a mare and the court understood this to mean that Vanduzer was going around telling others that Andrews had been guilty of the crime against nature with a
129:. (This varied from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Sometimes the two terms were understood to be synonymous; sometimes sodomy was limited to sexual activities between two humans; and sometimes sodomy was taken to include anal sex or bestiality, whereas 283:
ruled that the crime against nature statute, N.C. G.S. § 14-177, is not unconstitutional on its face because it may properly be used to criminalize sexual conduct involving minors, non-consensual or coercive conduct, public conduct, and
182:
of the offense during the second half of the 20th century, so that, by 2003, it was no longer a punishable offense in 36 out of 50 U.S. states, and was only punishable by a fine in some of the remaining 14. (See
174:, the Court wrote that, if this were a new statute, it would have been "obviously unconstitutional for vagueness", but, since this was a statute whose history was traceable back to the reign of 319: 232: 363:. The portion criminalising consensual sex in private between adults was struck down by the Supreme Court of India in 2018 - but officially remain on the statute books. 551: 366: 331:
Except for the above eight states, all other states in the United States have repealed their "crimes against nature" laws. Furthermore, in 2003, in
599: 734: 31: 627: 246: 437: 699: 295: 178:, it accumulated a number of judicial interpretations, and, backed with these interpretations, it was not unconstitutionally vague.) 729: 276: 505: 266: 183: 228: 280: 298:
in 1988) (note that the statute does not specifically outlaw offenses related to minors, which are treated elsewhere in law.)
660: 694: 202:
states. However, these laws are unconstitutional to enforce for sexual conduct between consenting adults in light of
208:(2003). The crime against nature statutes are, however, still used to criminalize sexual conduct involving minors, 465: 294:) (Struck down the part of the statute that criminalized heterosexual adult consensual anal and oral sex by the 242: 537: 555: 739: 488: 305: 61: 596: 291: 724: 245:) (Struck down the part of the statute that criminalized adult consensual anal and oral sex by the 231:) (Struck down the part of the statute that criminalized adult consensual anal and oral sex by the 92:
For much of modern history, a "crime against nature" was understood by courts to be synonymous to "
38: 709: 616: 412: 72:. Sexual practices that have historically been considered to be "crimes against nature" include 744: 356: 333: 204: 162: 157: 53: 603: 272: 57: 689: 718: 656: 576: 385: 381: 238: 199: 69: 398: 301: 213: 73: 256: 417: 347: 315: 262: 704: 217: 175: 668: 17: 224: 105: 81: 478:
Rex v. Samuel Jacobs (1817); Prindle v. State of Texas, 21 S.W. 360 (1893)
140:
Historically, the offense was usually referred to by its longer name, the
311: 287: 252: 195: 123:
is closely related to, and was often used interchangeably with, the term
109: 97: 615:
Jayasurya, Jayantha; Malalgoda, Vijith K.; Obeyesekere, Arjuna (2023).
407: 93: 65: 538:"Perkins v. State of North Carolina, 234 F. Supp. 333 (W.D.N.C. 1964)" 403: 209: 125: 77: 452:
See Rose v. Locke, 1975, 96 S.Ct. 243, 423 U.S. 48, 46 L.Ed.2d 185.
166:. On the other hand, just seven years prior, a similar challenge ( 194:
Currently, the term crime against nature is still used in the
30:
This article is about types of sex act. For other uses, see
552:"Sodomy law revisions are upheld on appeal, Times-Picayune" 460: 458: 665:
Homosexuality in Eighteenth-Century England: A Sourcebook
506:"The role of common law concepts in modern jurisprudence" 320:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
154:
crime against nature, committed with mankind or beast
233:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
37:For the crime against the natural environment, see 448: 446: 597:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GREGORY PAUL WHITELEY 27:Forms of sexual behaviour not considered natural 710:Is Sodomy Against Nature? A Thomistic Appraisal 661:"The Shortest Way with Whores and Rogues, 1703" 375:carnal intercourse against the order of nature 8: 690:Everything2.com page on crime against nature 524:The American and English Encyclopedia of Law 517: 515: 367:Article 365 of the Sri Lankan Penal Code 695:NCGala.org page on crime against nature 577:"COMMONWEALTH vs. RICHARD L. BALTHAZAR" 429: 52:has historically been a legal term in 68:or decent and are legally punishable 32:Crime against nature (disambiguation) 7: 247:Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 108:. Early court decisions agreed that 438:Commentaries on the Laws of England 384:in the imperial penal code of the 296:Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals 25: 705:Sodomy Laws in the United States 700:Idaho's crime against nature law 633:from the original on 6 July 2023 361:sexual acts against human nature 184:Sodomy laws in the United States 170:) failed in North Carolina. (In 440:, Book 4, Chapter 15, Section 4 281:North Carolina Court of Appeals 388:- repealed in 1994 officially. 327:Repeal and unconstitutionality 1: 617:"PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL" 735:Common law legal terminology 522:Charles F. Williams (1893). 156:. This phrase originates in 436:William Blackstone (1753), 359:(since 1860) prohibits all 292:Okla. Stat. § 21-886 (2019) 761: 624:Supreme Court of Sri Lanka 554:. Nola.com. Archived from 36: 29: 146:abominable and detestable 142:detestable and abominable 133:also included fellatio.) 730:LGBT-related legislation 371:Ordinance No. 2 of 1883 88:History and terminology 464:Andrews v. Vanduzer, 267:Miss. Code § 97-29-59 60:identifying forms of 131:crime against nature 121:crime against nature 46:crime against nature 378:still in the books. 355:Article 377 of the 316:Va. Code § 18.2-361 39:Environmental crime 602:2008-10-12 at the 413:Legality of incest 322:on March 12, 2013) 318:) (Struck down by 96:", and to include 357:Indian Penal Code 334:Lawrence v. Texas 243:MGL Ch. 272, § 34 205:Lawrence v. Texas 198:of the following 163:Franklin v. State 148:, or, sometimes, 16:(Redirected from 752: 679: 677: 676: 667:. Archived from 643: 642: 640: 638: 632: 621: 612: 606: 594: 588: 587: 585: 584: 573: 567: 566: 564: 563: 548: 542: 541: 534: 528: 527: 519: 510: 509: 502: 496: 495: 493: 489:"Ausman v. Veal" 485: 479: 476: 470: 462: 453: 450: 441: 434: 168:Perkins v. State 158:Buggery Act 1533 21: 760: 759: 755: 754: 753: 751: 750: 749: 715: 714: 686: 674: 672: 655: 652: 650:Further reading 647: 646: 636: 634: 630: 619: 614: 613: 609: 604:Wayback Machine 595: 591: 582: 580: 575: 574: 570: 561: 559: 550: 549: 545: 536: 535: 531: 521: 520: 513: 504: 503: 499: 491: 487: 486: 482: 477: 473: 463: 456: 451: 444: 435: 431: 426: 395: 373:) criminalizes 343: 329: 192: 90: 64:not considered 62:sexual behavior 42: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 758: 756: 748: 747: 742: 737: 732: 727: 717: 716: 713: 712: 707: 702: 697: 692: 685: 684:External links 682: 681: 680: 651: 648: 645: 644: 607: 589: 568: 543: 529: 511: 497: 480: 471: 454: 442: 428: 427: 425: 422: 421: 420: 415: 410: 401: 394: 391: 390: 389: 379: 364: 342: 339: 328: 325: 324: 323: 309: 299: 285: 273:North Carolina 270: 260: 250: 236: 212:, public sex, 191: 188: 186:for details.) 89: 86: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 757: 746: 743: 741: 740:Legal history 738: 736: 733: 731: 728: 726: 723: 722: 720: 711: 708: 706: 703: 701: 698: 696: 693: 691: 688: 687: 683: 671:on 2005-12-17 670: 666: 662: 658: 657:Rictor Norton 654: 653: 649: 629: 625: 618: 611: 608: 605: 601: 598: 593: 590: 578: 572: 569: 558:on 2015-10-18 557: 553: 547: 544: 539: 533: 530: 525: 518: 516: 512: 507: 501: 498: 490: 484: 481: 475: 472: 467: 461: 459: 455: 449: 447: 443: 439: 433: 430: 423: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 405: 402: 400: 397: 396: 392: 387: 386:German Empire 383: 382:Paragraph 175 380: 376: 372: 368: 365: 362: 358: 354: 353: 352: 351: 349: 340: 338: 336: 335: 326: 321: 317: 313: 310: 307: 303: 300: 297: 293: 289: 286: 284:prostitution) 282: 278: 277:G.S. § 14-177 274: 271: 268: 264: 261: 258: 257:MCL § 750.158 254: 251: 248: 244: 240: 239:Massachusetts 237: 234: 230: 226: 223: 222: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 201: 197: 189: 187: 185: 179: 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 132: 128: 127: 122: 117: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 87: 85: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 50:unnatural act 47: 40: 33: 19: 18:Unnatural act 673:. Retrieved 669:the original 664: 635:. Retrieved 623: 610: 592: 581:. Retrieved 579:. 1974-11-01 571: 560:. Retrieved 556:the original 546: 532: 523: 500: 483: 474: 432: 399:Criminal law 374: 370: 360: 345: 344: 341:Similar laws 332: 330: 302:Rhode Island 214:prostitution 203: 193: 180: 171: 167: 161: 153: 149: 145: 141: 139: 135: 130: 124: 120: 118: 113: 112:(copulation 101: 100:(copulation 91: 74:masturbation 49: 45: 43: 637:18 February 418:Natural law 348:Sodomy laws 263:Mississippi 190:Current use 725:Sex crimes 719:Categories 675:2005-12-31 583:2016-03-09 562:2012-03-18 424:References 306:§ 11-10-1. 229:R.S. 14:89 218:bestiality 176:Henry VIII 106:bestiality 82:bestiality 56:-speaking 369:(through 346:See also 225:Louisiana 119:The term 745:Sex laws 628:Archived 600:Archived 466:N.Y.Sup. 393:See also 312:Virginia 288:Oklahoma 253:Michigan 249:in 1974) 235:in 2005) 200:American 196:statutes 150:infamous 110:fellatio 102:per anum 98:anal sex 70:offenses 659:(Ed.). 408:Buggery 279:) (The 172:Perkins 94:buggery 66:natural 54:English 469:beast. 404:Sodomy 210:incest 126:sodomy 114:per os 104:) and 78:sodomy 58:states 631:(PDF) 620:(PDF) 492:(PDF) 639:2024 216:and 144:(or 80:and 44:The 48:or 721:: 663:. 626:. 622:. 514:^ 457:^ 445:^ 406:, 220:. 152:) 84:. 76:, 678:. 641:. 586:. 565:. 540:. 526:. 508:. 494:. 350:. 314:( 308:) 304:( 290:( 275:( 269:) 265:( 259:) 255:( 241:( 227:( 41:. 34:. 20:)

Index

Unnatural act
Crime against nature (disambiguation)
Environmental crime
English
states
sexual behavior
natural
offenses
masturbation
sodomy
bestiality
buggery
anal sex
bestiality
fellatio
sodomy
Buggery Act 1533
Franklin v. State
Henry VIII
Sodomy laws in the United States
statutes
American
Lawrence v. Texas
incest
prostitution
bestiality
Louisiana
R.S. 14:89
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Massachusetts

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.