31:
200:. On Knowledge we don't mother articles, we father them. Or we do that if we want to stay sane. Don't wrap the article in warm towels, send it out to graze its knees! Edit it further, yes, of course, but you have released your child to go and play outside. Watch it from a distance and just correct things when absolutely essential.
67:
411:
White, as everyone knows, is the absence of color, and black is the opposite. Yet, what we call black reflects no light waves at all and is, thus, the absence of color—while what we call white (again to quote the dictionary) is: "The reflection of all the rays that produce color." Therefore, the
333:
Doing these things, even imperfectly, means that others are likely to be kindly disposed to the new article, and, if it is about a notable topic, likely to expand it. Even if they do not expand it the survival of the article is enhanced because it is likely to be suitable for inclusion in the
337:
Things "ought to have articles here." I hope you understand that every editor here thinks that things ought to have articles here, too, even those who propose articles for deletion. There must, though, be initial article quality. That initial article may be very short, but, even in extreme
278:
We expect people to go to the source for things that are useful but not notable. That also means that an article about Foo has to concentrate on the notability of Foo, with the assumption that folk will be inspired to visit foo.com to discover the heady delights of rolling about in Foo.
367:
Apart from taking constructive comments on board and learning your trade here, realise that this is a complex place, and not always very kind. The only thing to take personally here is praise. Everything else is fluff and flummery and background noise.
100:
It means that just adding a new article is insufficient. Knowledge does require some work from its contributors. Creating an article with minimal information, providing no other citations, and doing no other work is doomed to failure.
163:
wikilinks to other articles. An article that is a dead end is sometimes reasonable, but usually there are useful places to link to. Check that the destination is the article you expect, do not just create a wikilink and hope for the
251:
that this is so takes absolute precedence over the truth, Knowledge is based upon citations and citable, verifiable facts, not upon truth, because it is an encyclopaedia, and, rightly or wrongly, that is what an encyclopaedia does.
195:
One very important thing is to "let go" once you have posted the article. The only time it is "yours" is when it's in your head. The moment you place it on
Knowledge it becomes "everyone's" Letting go of your baby is hard. Read
275:, never usefulness. Sometimes that means cutting a lot of genuinely useful material from an article to concentrate only on the items that make it notable. For genuinely useful things notability can be found, usually, given time.
263:
The problem
Knowledge has with things which are useful is that it is not a compendium of useful things. Indeed many notable things (celebrities!) are wholly useless, but they have articles because they pass
85:
to work, nor about how you want it to work. What matters is how it works. Once you understand this then you will be able to add new articles to your heart's content, confident that they will survive.
144:
For a living person we have a higher standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is
492:
345:
If those building blocks are not present and the article is not about a notable thing, and has no verifiability from reliable sources then the article has no value to anyone,
325:
Note that an inability to find references means the draft is unlikely to be accepted (0.9 probability). We want new articles here, and we try hard to maintain high standards.
81:
If you are to have an enjoyable time here adding articles and editing articles you need to understand how the place works. It doesn't matter about how it, perhaps,
375:
thoughts. You may disagree, so may others. That's fine, that is part of what
Knowledge creates - we work together. If you disagree, please let me know by using
334:
encyclopaedia. This is because it is a useful article since it gives information. It is insufficient for an article simply to exist, it must have value.
338:
brevity, must meet the guidelines, and must have the building blocks from which it may be expanded alongside genuine and verifiable notability. Read
260:
I know you will appreciate the distinction. Very many celebrities are notable, almost none are useful. The reverse is true of many tools.
167:
wikilinks to the article you have created from other articles. This means that the article is not "orphaned" and that others will find it.
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
376:
47:
119:. Check the definition of reliable sources, and learn how to use the CITE facilities in the edit window. You can add a parameter
400:
197:
90:
350:
203:
Please never, not ever, confuse the truth that you know and are 100% certain about with verifiable facts. Even if you know
160:
Do not forget a section for
References ==References== and put in it the text {{Reflist}} to receive the things you cite.
356:
I truly hope this helps you understand how to start to create good articles and enjoy being here. You may have had a
271:
There is a trick to getting articles accepted in such a manner that they reman here. The trick is to demonstrate
171:
339:
298:
Select the facts from those references that you wish to use (you will cite the facts with those references
487:
361:
109:
51:
108:
notability of the topic that is the subject matter of the article. This is non-negotiable. Read
429:
424:
360:
and learnt that it is not a gentle place. Working within the rules can be rewarding. Trying to
396:
39:
123:
to the cite before you save it and use a relevant snippet of the item you are citing, too.
457:
357:
75:
This is an essay, intended for new editors, to help them to understand things at
Knowledge
451:
299:
188:
481:
309:
265:
181:
17:
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
312:
use the article wizard to start a new draft. It is not mandatory, but it guides you
292:
248:
153:
139:
135:
116:
272:
237:
227:
217:
207:
170:
inclusion of the article in the most relevant category (or categories). Read
97:. Once you understand this then you have pretty much the entire trick to it.
461:
187:
in the article, or, better, deploy the best possible stub tag. Read
315:
Write very neutral, flat prose, citing the references for the facts
61:
25:
95:
Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information
243:
is black still has no place here. Indeed a statement that
89:
I'm afraid this means a bit of reading for you. Look at
412:
logic is inevitable: black is white, and white is black.
104:
To create a successful article there really should be:
318:
Double check your work and submit the draft when happy
223:
black, unless there is a citation for it, the obvious
321:
While awaiting review, continue to enhance your work
126:We require references from significant coverage
425:"Black-Is-White - Trailer - Cast - Showtimes"
8:
493:User essays on editing and building content
388:
7:
305:Create a storyboard from those facts
287:It's pretty formulaic, a process:
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
48:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
24:
377:User talk:Timtrent/A good article
401:National Federation of the Blind
65:
29:
198:Knowledge:Ownership of articles
91:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
351:Knowledge:No original research
1:
291:Find references, good ones.
115:citations to the topic from
177:If a short article, deploy
93:first. Look especially at
509:
347:however well-written it is
450:McCutcheon, George Barr.
172:Knowledge:Categorization
73:This page in a nutshell:
379:and we can discuss it.
340:Knowledge:Verifiability
213:the colour black to be
397:"Circle of Sophistry"
247:with a citation in a
50:, as it has not been
302:is your friend here)
233:truth that it really
110:Knowledge:Notability
150:independent of them
430:The New York Times
362:push the envelope
256:Useful vs Notable
79:
78:
60:
59:
500:
472:
471:
469:
468:
456:. Open Library.
447:
441:
440:
438:
437:
421:
415:
414:
408:
407:
393:
242:
236:
232:
226:
222:
216:
212:
206:
186:
180:
130:the entity, and
117:reliable sources
69:
68:
62:
33:
32:
26:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
478:
477:
476:
475:
466:
464:
449:
448:
444:
435:
433:
423:
422:
418:
405:
403:
395:
394:
390:
385:
358:baptism of fire
331:
285:
258:
249:reliable source
240:
234:
230:
224:
220:
214:
210:
204:
184:
178:
66:
56:
55:
44:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
496:
495:
490:
480:
479:
474:
473:
453:Black is white
442:
416:
387:
386:
384:
381:
364:always fails.
330:
327:
323:
322:
319:
316:
313:
306:
303:
296:
284:
281:
257:
254:
245:Black is White
193:
192:
189:Knowledge:Stub
175:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:
156:
142:
134:of it, and in
113:
77:
76:
70:
58:
57:
45:
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
494:
491:
489:
486:
485:
483:
463:
459:
455:
454:
446:
443:
432:
431:
426:
420:
417:
413:
402:
398:
392:
389:
382:
380:
378:
374:
369:
365:
363:
359:
354:
352:
348:
343:
341:
335:
329:In conclusion
328:
326:
320:
317:
314:
311:
307:
304:
301:
297:
294:
290:
289:
288:
282:
280:
276:
274:
269:
267:
261:
255:
253:
250:
246:
239:
229:
219:
209:
201:
199:
190:
183:
176:
173:
169:
166:
162:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:
122:
118:
114:
111:
107:
106:
105:
102:
98:
96:
92:
87:
84:
74:
71:
64:
63:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
18:User:Timtrent
465:. Retrieved
452:
445:
434:. Retrieved
428:
419:
410:
404:. Retrieved
391:
372:
370:
366:
355:
346:
344:
336:
332:
324:
286:
277:
270:
262:
259:
244:
241:}}
235:{{
231:}}
225:{{
221:}}
215:{{
211:}}
205:{{
202:
194:
185:}}
179:{{
152:, and is in
149:
145:
138:please. See
131:
127:
120:
103:
99:
94:
88:
82:
80:
72:
37:
488:User essays
283:How to plan
132:independent
38:This is an
482:Categories
467:2013-11-18
436:2013-11-18
406:2013-11-18
383:References
371:These are
146:about them
148:, and is
462:7113506M
349:. Read
300:WP:CITE
121:|quote=
460:
310:WP:AFC
308:Using
266:WP:GNG
293:WP:42
164:best.
154:WP:RS
140:WP:42
136:WP:RS
128:about
83:ought
40:essay
16:<
295:ones
273:WP:N
182:Stub
484::
458:OL
427:.
409:.
399:.
373:my
353:.
342:.
268:.
238:cn
228:cn
218:cn
208:OR
470:.
439:.
191:.
174:.
112:.
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.