1606:
made public by Arbcom (Malleus, but you already knew that though, huh?)B)you seem to have not explained your actions and have given attitude to Rich F. above ("I think were going to have to disagree on that one"). I have alerted Rich F./Kum. via their talkpages of this notice. Please be advised that actions such as this will only get you bought into negative spotlight in the future. Please seek advice before acting hostily such as. Lastly, do treat all users equally as you do with
Malleus. As I note, you nearly retired last year when Arbcom were leaning to topic ban Malleus. Maybe you are too emotionally connected/too young to/for the project to be editing in this capacity. I have a feeling you maybe letting Malleus secretly use your admin account, checkuser maybe of necessary recourse. Please take needed time off.
1150:, Arbcom did that, I just supported it and I still do. Sarek used to be a great admin, over the years he has become callous and no longer listens to the story. He levees severe blocks without hesitation. That is not the type of Admin we need here. Sandstein is a powermonger and Fram is an idiot and there are plenty more bad ones out there as well just like these three. If we get rid of some of these bad admins maybe some of the 640+ others will start participating if some of the jerks are moved out of the way. Right now there isn't any room to get past the big ego's. Anyway, I expect this to be deleted as atacks or whatever. It doesn't matter, I just wanted to explain some things and set the record straight. Not that I beleive for a second anyone cares. As you can see I am still a little pissed off. Kumioko
1095:
would prefer to give the tools to users like
Sandstein, Fram, Sarek and others that want to block everyone and open up months long Arbcom cases against every editor they don't agree with, then manipulate policy so they are even more powerful and can do even more they don't need contributors like me who want to build an encyclopedia. 28bytes is right, I am fed up with this place, the toxic culture, the us and them admin to editor attitudes and with the politics of it all. I wanted to contribute but the power elite just want to insult and bully so I don't have time for that crap.
31:
1274:
122:
1121:
socking. People edit what they are interested in so the only way to make a "clean start" is to edit stuff outside your interests (because presumably you were editing within your interests prior) and that's unrealistic. Most of the time you have to say on your page I used to be X and now I am Y. That's not a clean start, that's a name change and is pointless. Its a hypocritical nonsense policy.
963:, but the short version is, he kept editing projectspace pages as an IP without identifying himself, after being asked again and again not to do that. I made it clear that if he agreed not to do that anymore, I would lift the block, but by that point he was so fed up with Knowledge that he got the stewards to globally lock his account.
1621:
LOL. First, you're a bit behind the curve: I unblocked
Kumioko several days ago. (See the section just above.) Second, I did not "nearly retire" over any ArbCom discussions; you are perhaps confusing me with another editor. Thirdly, any arrangements I have with Malleus to borrow my admin account are
1605:
Hi. I see you have not provided good reason to your block of Kumoku to admin Rich F. above. Please be advised that your actions are under scrutiny, I have contacted Jimbo by email. The reason I am appalled by your actions is, A)you seem to have not blocked a user for similar socking issues that were
1120:
next I want to clarify a couple other things. Clean start is an ineffective crap policy and should be deleted since the culture here doesn't support it. You can't do a clean start without being dishonest and you certainly can't do it with the same user name. Eventually someone will call you out for
556:
Thanks for the courtesy notes. Looks like Mark Arsten has put the AN/I thread out of its misery, so perhaps this particular episode is winding down. The outcome I was hoping for was a sincere commitment to avoid the problematic behavior in the future, followed by a prompt unblock, but for whatever
1443:
Just wanted to comment. That's why I created this account. The
Kumioko account is permalocked, someone would find a reason to block me for socking if my "new" username doesn't contain Kumioko in it and clean start is a garbage unsupported policy so that's why I named the account the way I did. If
1094:
Greetings all, I saw a lot of traffic with my name on it today so I just wanted to make a couple passing comments. First, thanks Rich for the kind words in the various venues. I appreciate it but there's no need to spend time defending my actions. This place isn't worth it to me anymore. If they
985:
made a secret of his identity, and it was very sad to see people attacking him for "socking". Moreover I have always believed, and I think this is part of Wiki culture too, that the validity of arguments does not depend on who is advancing them. If
Kumioko wishes to leave the project and to be
688:
As long as he or she doesn't give the false impression that
Zaminamina and LiquidWater are separate editors, there shouldn't be a problem. Whatever comments they made should be considered on their own merit regardless of the rename. A slight correction to your comment on the talk page:
513:. You or any admin. is fully welcome to review the entire situation and make determinations of their own; and adjust the situation as they see fit. I apologize for any discomfort this may cause, but I feel my determinations are in the best interests of the project. Kind regards, —
1221:
Fair enough. Thank you for the heads up. Of course, both are for the purpose of preventing impersonation. I would imagine an editor could request a dozen such actions if it would secure them against impersonation. I'll wait on a 'Crat. Any idea how long that might take? —
780:
Thanks! It was very informative! The question would be - if a Target is Ursurp'd to a user - and the target made about 10 edits in 2005 - would the target's edits still be out there as made by "Vanished" or would they be "Gone" "Gone" as in no record whatsoever?
1244:
I'd give it a week or so. Requests don't get archived automatically, so a 'crat will follow up on it one way or another before too long. Since you talked to Avi about it previously, you may want to check with him if you'd like a quicker answer. Cheers,
864:
when on the exact same date, hour and minute we have this 06:07, 23 June 2011 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) blocked Ppged55567855jd (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) with an expiry time of indefinite
1026:'s comment calling for desysopping Sarek, and not realizing it was Kumioko, whom Sarek had previously blocked. As I told Kumioko (and I apologize for repeating myself here), if he agreed not to do that anymore, I was quite willing to unblock him.
1043:, or what have you. Judging from his comments, I'd be surprised if he was in a hurry to do that – he seems quite burned and burned out by Knowledge, and could probably do with a break from it – but of course that's up to him to decide.
795:
Those 10 edits which would previously have been attributed to "User:Whoever" would be now be attributed to "User:Whoever (usurped)" or whatever that account was renamed to; usually we just tack on "(usurped)" to the name.
986:
blocked, that is one thing. To block him for something perfectly innocent is very much another. And as a consequence of this block one or more of his (acknowledged) IPs have been abusively blocked by, I think AGK.
1013:
I agree there's a lot to be said for the idea that the validity of arguments does not depend on who is advancing them, but there are times where that's not the case, and showing up to an arbitration case
1018:
is one of those cases, I believe. Let me pose it to you this way: if, during your arbitration case, you found out that you had been desysopped due largely to the evidence or comments presented by
1546:". This template does not shows the right calculation in date when I want to use it in my user page. I have tried to fix it but everything went to failure since this template is so complicated.
733:
Sorry to be a bother, but you seem to be knowledgable on the subject - I am expanding my
Wikiknowledge - what does "usurp accounts" refer to? The only article I could find says its outdated.
832:. Note on the latter one, there is no User:, its just the name. Was this an usurp gone bad, or one of those things called a false positive? I'm sure its just some weird glitch in the system.
1022:, and you later found out that User:192.168.2.1 was Fram logged out, you'd probably be quite annoyed by that, wouldn't you? I think the same principle applies to people who were reading
1561:
Hi
Irfanshaharuddin. Unfortunately that template is way too confusing for me to make sense of. (I would not have expected it to be 3 kilobytes in size!) You may have better luck at the
981:
There is no reason that anyone cannot edit as an IP. Indeed I determined to do so myself at one point, rather than deal with the dramah, but SUL kept signing me back in. Kumioko
931:
Why is he blocked? I don't see any block evasion. Just
Hersfold and Sandstein being confrontational. And even if there was an indef block serves no purpose, certainly it does not
1203:
Hi there. I don't think I've ever seen two simultaneous requests to usurp accounts from one editor, so I'm leaving that one for a 'crat who's been around longer to handle.
1061:- but that IP was already well known to be Kumioko, and he was not blocked when he made that edit. Therefore the edit was neither block evasion, nor illegitimate socking.
860:
Well yeah but then it gets weird - it says 06:07, 23 June 2011 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted page
Materialscientist (Mass deletion of pages added by Ppged55567855jd)
869:..ahh I see - (sorry a lil dense) it is Gogo deleting the crap on Materialscientist's page and simultainously cracking the whip on some dude named Ppged55567855jd!
1382:
1180:
I don't know if you're the person I need to ask, but I'm still waiting on a Usurpation which says should have been "addressed on or before March 20, 2013"
1411:. Should that account be blocked also, pending agreement to the unblock conditions you mentioned above (i.e., no unidentified projectspace IP editing?)
1647:
Jimbo here saying "right back at ya, 28bytes". I can't be bothered logging out of this account & into my real one just for a quick note, sorry ;)
766:
is the page where usurps are requested. It gives a basic overview of the process, but I can (try to) answer any questions you might have about it.
1376:
579:
Hi, I wish to rename my profile, What am I to do? I've another profile and i want to pass my contributions to this..... (Sorry for my bad english)
734:
1335:
1023:
1151:
1429:
Personally I'd be inclined to let him be until/unless he starts in with the IP posts again, but that's just one admin's opinion.
1400:
535:
per discussion and request on my talk page I have attempted to restore your original expiration of the aforementioned block. —
1227:
1188:
111:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1388:
1329:
461:
454:
449:
444:
437:
432:
427:
420:
415:
410:
403:
398:
393:
386:
381:
376:
369:
364:
359:
352:
347:
335:
330:
325:
318:
313:
308:
301:
296:
291:
284:
279:
274:
267:
262:
257:
250:
245:
240:
233:
228:
223:
216:
211:
206:
199:
194:
189:
94:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
1223:
1184:
1039:
All that said, I've got no objection if an admin wishes to unblock to allow Kumioko to clean-start, or to come back as
1642:
1513:
1485:
1449:
1370:
494:
182:
177:
172:
165:
160:
155:
148:
143:
138:
1588:
1551:
824:
Hey 28bytes - found an interesting thing here and I think it may involve ursups. We have this fine Wikipedian here
618:
I just did a copy/pasta in my preferences. If I goofed something up - feel free to smack me with a clue bat. :) —
38:
1066:
991:
960:
956:
940:
473:
1611:
1543:
670:(20:18, 19 March 2013 28bytes (talk | contribs) renamed user Zaminamina (553 edits) to LiquidWater (WP:CHU))
1040:
1509:
1481:
1459:
1445:
1365:
1155:
825:
1607:
1584:
1547:
1353:
892:
874:
837:
815:
786:
742:
716:
678:
846:
Looks like it's just vandals who thought it would be funny to make an article about Materialscientist.
829:
1566:
1063:
988:
937:
1562:
1341:
1284:
479:
1671:
1631:
1574:
1499:
1471:
1434:
1323:
1302:
1250:
1208:
1085:
1048:
968:
851:
801:
771:
702:
645:
603:
584:
562:
47:
17:
667:. I was wondering - what is the usual protocol when that happens? Does his vote still count?
1656:
888:
870:
833:
811:
782:
738:
712:
694:
674:
475:
121:
1273:
663:
I noticed you helped Zaminamina change his name - he was participating in an active RFC at
1539:
1196:
763:
690:
697:, which is the standard operating procedure for most types of renames. Hope this helps.
1414:
664:
627:
544:
522:
1280:
595:
1675:
1667:
1660:
1635:
1627:
1615:
1592:
1578:
1570:
1555:
1517:
1503:
1495:
1489:
1475:
1467:
1463:
1453:
1438:
1430:
1423:
1318:
1306:
1298:
1288:
1254:
1246:
1231:
1212:
1204:
1192:
1159:
1089:
1081:
1072:
1052:
1044:
1019:
997:
972:
964:
946:
896:
878:
855:
847:
841:
819:
805:
797:
790:
775:
767:
746:
720:
706:
698:
682:
649:
641:
634:
607:
599:
588:
580:
566:
558:
551:
529:
1652:
1444:
there is some other caveat that I need to follow that I am missing let me know.
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1462:
and not any other accounts or IPs? If the answer is yes, I'll note that in the
622:
539:
517:
1666:
Wait, I thought I was Jimbo? Or was Jimbo Malleus? It's all so confusing.
477:
1466:
block log so there's not any confusion about whether you can edit.
1538:
Hi, 28bytes ! I just want you to help me on fixing a template in
1183:
Is there a problem? Who should I discuss this with? Thank you. —
594:
Hi there. If you're interested in simply renaming your account,
1624:
That last bit is a joke, which any checkuser can easily confirm
480:
115:
25:
735:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:SUL/Consultation_on_renames
828:
but I found what looks like a copy of the same name here:
598:
is the place to go. If you have any trouble, let me know.
1406:
1394:
1359:
1347:
1080:
I think we're going to have to disagree on that point.
1015:
866:
861:
510:
557:reason it looks like that was not to be. Ah well.
488:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
1364:for block evasion. They are now editing as
656:Protocol in an RFC when a user changes name
1458:Will you commit to editing solely from
498:when more than 28 sections are present.
1649:Disclaimer as per above 28bytes reply.
1317:Hi, you recently indefinitely blocked
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1148:I did not suggest Sarek be desysopped
7:
107:The following discussion is closed.
673:Let me know what you think, thanks!
1569:might be able to help. Good luck!
1016:pushing for the desysop of someone
509:I have modified a block of yours.
24:
492:may be automatically archived by
1272:
120:
29:
1583:Alright. I will figure it out.
1626:. But tell Jimbo I said "hi."
1:
935:the chance of block evasion!
1297:Thanks, and you're welcome!
1224:Temporary to usurp Loverobin
1185:Temporary to usurp Loverobin
1146:I also want to clarify that
1057:Yes I'm not denying it was
1698:
1676:20:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
1661:19:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
1636:19:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
1616:19:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
1593:23:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
1579:20:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
1556:11:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
1518:02:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
1504:01:28, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
1490:00:51, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
1480:Yes that is my intention.
1476:23:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
1454:16:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
1439:14:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
1424:10:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
1307:17:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
1289:10:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
1255:20:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
1232:19:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
1213:17:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
1193:10:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
1160:16:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
1090:14:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
1073:08:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
1053:04:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
998:04:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
973:03:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
947:03:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
897:02:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
879:06:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
856:03:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
842:03:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
820:02:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
806:23:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
791:21:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
776:20:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
747:20:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
721:21:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
707:21:51, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
683:21:39, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
650:20:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
635:20:41, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
608:20:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
589:20:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
567:03:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
552:20:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
530:08:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
109:Please do not modify it.
1279:Thanks for the rename!
1460:User:KumiokoCleanStart
495:Lowercase sigmabot III
1265:A cup of tea for you!
1041:User:Kumioko returned
42:of past discussions.
1622:between me and him.
1601:Blocking of Kumioko.
1567:User:Rich Farmbrough
1544:User Wikipedian for
1024:User:108.28.162.125
955:The background is
110:
1678:
1650:
1643:talk page stalker
1625:
1534:Fixing a template
1510:KumiokoCleanStart
1482:KumiokoCleanStart
1446:KumiokoCleanStart
1422:
1366:KumiokoCleanStart
1313:KumiokoCleanStart
1294:
1293:
1076:
1001:
950:
830:Materialscientist
826:Materialscientist
711:It does, thanks!
693:does redirect to
633:
550:
528:
502:
501:
467:
466:
108:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:28bytes
1689:
1665:
1648:
1646:
1623:
1585:Irfanshaharuddin
1548:Irfanshaharuddin
1421:
1419:
1412:
1410:
1383:deleted contribs
1363:
1336:deleted contribs
1276:
1269:
1268:
1071:
1020:User:192.168.2.1
996:
945:
695:User:LiquidWater
632:
630:
619:
549:
547:
536:
527:
525:
514:
497:
481:
135:
134:
124:
116:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1640:
1603:
1540:Malay Knowledge
1536:
1415:
1413:
1368:
1321:
1315:
1267:
1197:User:Love Robin
1178:
929:
691:User:Zaminamina
658:
628:
620:
616:
577:
545:
537:
523:
515:
507:
493:
482:
476:
129:
113:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1695:
1693:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1608:Mr. barbers773
1602:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1535:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1314:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1292:
1291:
1277:
1266:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1216:
1215:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1077:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
976:
975:
951:
928:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
726:
725:
724:
723:
665:Talk:Karl Marx
657:
654:
653:
652:
640:Lookin' good!
615:
612:
611:
610:
576:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
506:
503:
500:
499:
487:
484:
483:
478:
474:
472:
469:
468:
465:
464:
458:
457:
452:
447:
441:
440:
435:
430:
424:
423:
418:
413:
407:
406:
401:
396:
390:
389:
384:
379:
373:
372:
367:
362:
356:
355:
350:
345:
339:
338:
333:
328:
322:
321:
316:
311:
305:
304:
299:
294:
288:
287:
282:
277:
271:
270:
265:
260:
254:
253:
248:
243:
237:
236:
231:
226:
220:
219:
214:
209:
203:
202:
197:
192:
186:
185:
180:
175:
169:
168:
163:
158:
152:
151:
146:
141:
131:
130:
125:
119:
114:
105:
104:
102:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1694:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1644:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1600:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1565:, or perhaps
1564:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1533:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1420:
1418:
1408:
1405:
1402:
1399:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1375:
1372:
1367:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1346:
1343:
1340:
1337:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1325:
1320:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1275:
1271:
1270:
1264:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1181:
1175:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
999:
994:
993:
990:
984:
980:
979:
978:
977:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
952:
948:
943:
942:
939:
934:
926:
898:
894:
890:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
876:
872:
868:
863:
859:
858:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
817:
813:
809:
808:
807:
803:
799:
794:
793:
792:
788:
784:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
765:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
722:
718:
714:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
687:
686:
685:
684:
680:
676:
671:
668:
666:
661:
660:Hey 28bytes,
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:
637:
636:
631:
625:
624:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
574:
568:
564:
560:
555:
554:
553:
548:
542:
541:
534:
533:
532:
531:
526:
520:
519:
512:
505:Courtesy note
504:
496:
491:
486:
485:
471:
470:
463:
460:
459:
456:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
442:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
425:
422:
419:
417:
414:
412:
409:
408:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
391:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
374:
371:
368:
366:
363:
361:
358:
357:
354:
351:
349:
346:
344:
341:
340:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
323:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
306:
303:
300:
298:
295:
293:
290:
289:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
272:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
255:
252:
249:
247:
244:
242:
239:
238:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
221:
218:
215:
213:
210:
208:
205:
204:
201:
198:
196:
193:
191:
188:
187:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
170:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
153:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
136:
133:
132:
128:
123:
118:
117:
112:
103:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1604:
1537:
1508:No problem.
1464:User:Kumioko
1416:
1403:
1397:
1391:
1385:
1379:
1373:
1356:
1350:
1344:
1338:
1332:
1326:
1316:
1182:
1179:
1152:138.162.0.41
1147:
1062:
1058:
987:
982:
936:
932:
930:
672:
669:
662:
659:
621:
617:
578:
538:
516:
508:
489:
342:
126:
106:
101:
78:
43:
37:
1494:Thank you.
889:Patriot1010
871:Patriot1010
834:Patriot1010
812:Patriot1010
783:Patriot1010
739:Patriot1010
713:Patriot1010
675:Patriot1010
614:testing 123
575:user rename
36:This is an
1417:Sandstein
1401:block user
1395:filter log
1354:block user
1348:filter log
1067:Farmbrough
992:Farmbrough
941:Farmbrough
865:(Trolling)
862:In the Log
462:Archive 58
455:Archive 57
450:Archive 56
445:Archive 55
438:Archive 54
433:Archive 53
428:Archive 52
421:Archive 51
416:Archive 50
411:Archive 49
404:Archive 48
399:Archive 47
394:Archive 46
387:Archive 45
382:Archive 44
377:Archive 43
370:Archive 42
365:Archive 41
360:Archive 40
353:Archive 39
348:Archive 38
343:Archive 37
336:Archive 36
331:Archive 35
326:Archive 34
319:Archive 33
314:Archive 32
309:Archive 31
302:Archive 30
297:Archive 29
292:Archive 28
285:Archive 27
280:Archive 26
275:Archive 25
268:Archive 24
263:Archive 23
258:Archive 22
251:Archive 21
246:Archive 20
241:Archive 19
234:Archive 18
229:Archive 17
224:Archive 16
217:Archive 15
212:Archive 14
207:Archive 13
200:Archive 12
195:Archive 11
190:Archive 10
95:Archive 40
90:Archive 39
85:Archive 38
79:Archive 37
73:Archive 36
68:Archive 35
60:Archive 30
1563:help desk
1407:block log
1360:block log
183:Archive 9
178:Archive 8
173:Archive 7
166:Archive 6
161:Archive 5
156:Archive 4
149:Archive 3
144:Archive 2
139:Archive 1
1542:called "
1377:contribs
1330:contribs
1281:Jules.LT
1059:annoying
764:WP:USURP
737:Thanks!
127:Archives
1668:28bytes
1628:28bytes
1571:28bytes
1496:28bytes
1468:28bytes
1431:28bytes
1319:Kumioko
1299:28bytes
1247:28bytes
1205:28bytes
1082:28bytes
1045:28bytes
965:28bytes
927:Kumioko
848:28bytes
810:Thanks!
798:28bytes
768:28bytes
699:28bytes
642:28bytes
600:28bytes
581:Indinur
559:28bytes
39:archive
1653:Sitush
1195:(also
933:reduce
887:Hmm...
596:WP:CHU
490:7 days
1176:Uhm…?
983:never
16:<
1672:talk
1657:talk
1632:talk
1612:talk
1589:talk
1575:talk
1552:talk
1514:talk
1500:talk
1486:talk
1472:talk
1450:talk
1435:talk
1389:logs
1371:talk
1342:logs
1324:talk
1303:talk
1285:talk
1251:talk
1228:talk
1209:talk
1189:talk
1156:talk
1086:talk
1064:Rich
1049:talk
989:Rich
969:talk
961:here
959:and
957:here
938:Rich
893:talk
875:talk
867:DIFF
852:talk
838:talk
816:talk
802:talk
787:talk
772:talk
743:talk
717:talk
703:talk
679:talk
646:talk
623:Ched
604:talk
585:talk
563:talk
540:Ched
518:Ched
511:diff
1674:)
1659:)
1651:-
1634:)
1614:)
1591:)
1577:)
1554:)
1516:)
1502:)
1488:)
1474:)
1452:)
1437:)
1305:)
1287:)
1253:)
1230:)
1211:)
1199:)
1191:)
1158:)
1088:)
1070:,
1051:)
995:,
971:)
944:,
895:)
877:)
854:)
840:)
818:)
804:)
789:)
774:)
745:)
719:)
705:)
681:)
648:)
629:?
626::
606:)
587:)
565:)
546:?
543::
524:?
521::
64:←
1670:(
1655:(
1645:)
1641:(
1630:(
1610:(
1587:(
1573:(
1550:(
1512:(
1498:(
1484:(
1470:(
1448:(
1433:(
1409:)
1404:·
1398:·
1392:·
1386:·
1380:·
1374:·
1369:(
1362:)
1357:·
1351:·
1345:·
1339:·
1333:·
1327:·
1322:(
1301:(
1283:(
1249:(
1226:(
1207:(
1187:(
1154:(
1084:(
1075:.
1047:(
1000:.
967:(
949:.
891:(
873:(
850:(
836:(
814:(
800:(
785:(
770:(
741:(
715:(
701:(
677:(
644:(
602:(
583:(
561:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
