User talk:Anti4ITCELL

1249: 1170: 1110: 1048: 964: 702: 546: 419: 317: 754:. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — 506:

This is absurd, you are just framing me up by putting a wrong note on my account. I reverted my own edit and you reverted it without noticing it which means you are only interested in reverting my edit. Every time when I edited I added something new and different but you reverted it. You are bullying

894:

Hi Doug can you please help me here. This Spacemanspiff is banning me for no reason. Spacemanspiff and Sitush seems to be sock-puppet account. An Uninvolved administrator comes and bans me for no reason. I didn't revert any user's edit on Yadav page nor did I undo anyone else's edit. I just added

380:

Indeed. And you can ping several people at once using {{ping|Username1|Username2|Username3}} etc. Please note that if you get a spelling wrong then editing it will not send the ping - you have to get it right first time. Also, there are reports that pings are not always received, although I think

346:

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Knowledge articles are

784:

whatever capacity you might be in but on what basis do you ban me from editing?? I didn't engage in any disruptive editing nor did I revert the edits of any user. I just added sources. Also I didn't even talk about Kshatriya status. Then you banning me means a vendetta or why would a so called

829:

you have banned me for wrong reasons and you are bullying me. I did't engage into any disruptive editing and you have banned me because you and SITUSH are a wiki sockfarm. If you have valid reasons to ban me then cite the exact reasons and exact edits of mine out here.

522:

Hi Anti4ITCELL. Discretionary sanction notices are placed for information purposes and don't necessarily mean that you've done something wrong. Usually, if you edit a lot in a DS area, you can expect a notice making you aware of the sanctions in place.

871:

My debate took place only on the talk page which is allowed and absolutely allowed. I didn't mess with the main page, you are on purpose banning me for no reason. If you have a specific genuine reason then quote it here with exact proof

466:. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read 1227:

You've been told enough and more times that you aren't allowed to edit about castes anywhere and you continue to do that. If you do it again after your current block expires then you are likely to be blocked indefinitely.

647:

I Did not make any reverts on the Yadav page. I reverted my own revert. Please stop posting false notices on my account. I didn't undo any edits except one of mine. Stop framing me by accusing me of false charges.

730:

from any edits or pages related to castes and social groups of South Asia, including but not limited to articles, talk pages, user talk pages, categories, templates and other pages or talk pages across the English

336: 785:

uninvolved administrator interfere when there is no disruptive editing?? Can you show me where did I engage in disruptive editing. You all seem to be a part of Sockfarm who don't want users to cite sources.

1027:

You were warned sufficiently that you can't edit about castes or social groups anywhere, now you're doing it on this talk page too, so I'm extending the block and revoking talk page access. —

320:

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Knowledge has readers from all over the world, our policy is to

191:. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 736: 475: 106: 22: 339:, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the 248: 247: 845:

You have already been given enough reasons and you've continued your crusade on the article after that, I'm not going to reconsider the ban, it is needed. —

1282: 1203: 1085: 265:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like 102: 98: 110: 72: 1277: 1198: 1134: 1080: 992: 42: 434:

on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to

895:

some good sources to which these people have a problem and thus are misusing their admin rights to stop me from adding more content.

30: 168: 157: 91: 597: 141: 62: 1186:

for continued TBAN violations over five now, including on own talk page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

609: 565: 747:

for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

613: 463: 57: 209:

Yeah, good point. I never thought of that. But, coming back, please be sure to sign your posts with ~~~~. Cheers,

1257: 1178: 1118: 1056: 972: 744: 619: 348: 321: 161: 740: 713: 427: 295: 272: 67: 33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Knowledge: 1293: 1235: 1214: 1156: 1096: 1034: 1014: 852: 810: 761: 121: 454:. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the 1266: 1187: 1127: 1069: 985: 605: 577: 553: 455: 224:@Kautilya3 Hi, if i have to tag someone to notify them of something do I use @ and user id of the person? 184: 117: 37: 712:, including changing of sourced content to personal preference etc, I have decided, in my capacity as an 160:, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being 953: 916: 686: 630: 529: 205:

Okay @Kautilya3 but your user page gives wrong information about yourself. It talks about a dead person

84: 327:

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use

601: 569: 561: 459: 356: 214: 196: 188: 1287: 1229: 1208: 1150: 1090: 1028: 1008: 981: 866: 846: 824: 804: 779: 755: 365: 352: 279: 262: 176: 52: 572:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

680:, are all reinstating all or part of the same information and count as edit warring reverts. -- 1265:

for sockpuppetry to continue tban violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

743:

to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be

1140: 998: 948: 933: 927: 911: 896: 889: 873: 831: 786: 681: 667: 649: 642: 625: 524: 508: 490: 396: 386: 332: 225: 1248: 1169: 1109: 1068:

violation during block for 2nd violation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

1047: 963: 328: 149: 377:

to ping a user, use {{ping|Username}} otherwise they can't get notification --Anonymous

1065: 727: 210: 192: 153: 179:

is a good place to start learning about Knowledge. If you have any questions, see the

360: 180: 128: 803:

is a violation of your topic ban, any further violations will be met with blocks. —

751: 701: 431: 47: 501: 486: 382: 447: 443: 145: 26: 1299: 1241: 1220: 1162: 1102: 1040: 1020: 956: 941: 919: 904: 881: 858: 839: 816: 794: 767: 691: 657: 635: 534: 516: 494: 404: 390: 367: 233: 218: 200: 1276: