User talk:BaldBoris/Archives/2015

1233:. Thanks for changing the publishers for the cites, I hadn't even noticed they had changed lol. I think the first stage's images can stay as they are, the guy who drew the course image for me would kill me if we removed it. I'm sure there is a few formulation mishaps, as I tend to use commas too much. This probably comes from my French origins. Anyway, do as you please, the only big work left is the final tables classification (mountains, sprints) but I have a week to take care of that, I'll do it no problem. 92: 1631: 2826: 48: 111: 1804: 3650: 2978: 1124: 644: 588: 532: 476: 420: 364: 308: 252: 62: 34: 3114:, utilising newspapers and trying to get as much as I could out of the videos from YouTube. Two years later, it has still remained unfinished! Whether I'll ever get around to finishing it is another matter. In regards to the 2012/2013 articles, I will probably get around to nominating at some point. Don't want to log them all at the one time though. Space it out over the coming months, I'd say. 2692: 1025: 970: 76: 2734: 1683: 1759: 879:

mean. Waterstones appear to have around 20% off on it just now, saving about £7. I remember texting a friend a few months back with a picture of some of my cycling books – ended up lending her the Christophe Bassons book – and I couldn't get them all in the photo! It was pretty embarrassing really. That and umpteen motor racing books, no wonder the bookcases are full!

3343: 2645: 3669:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2997:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2307: 1143:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 663:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 607:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 551:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 495:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 439:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 383:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 327:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 271:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3304: 3208: 2606: 1317: 1229: 697:

Hello! I'm not too bad. Still trying to catch up on results and palmares from last year, but hopefully I'll get on to that in the coming days, weeks and months. As to the recent "improvements" regarding aesthetics on the WikiProject, they are ludicrously stupid additions. Could you imagine the uproar

3435:

allowed by AWB rules (rule 4) and not necessary in any case. Where your changes alter the visual result (like in your GP - Grand Prix changes) there is no problem, but invisible changes that don't fix an error should not be made. There is no need to undo these changes, it's hardly useful to undo one

756:

I genuinely remember seeing something about the order a while back, but I cannot find it now... From what I can see on that edit, AWB has moved the normal ref templates around via parsing, putting them lowest first under the same format. However, it does not seem to work with short footnotes. Unless

2408:

I changed the tables to the visually acceptable standard wikitable style. I fixed the TdS team table as well as some others. I don't know if you've noticed that Froome's win is already on the front page. It was nominated by someone else before I had the chance and went up within an hour. Also I've

3576:

article and the women's race. While they were seperate races, it was clearly part of the same spectacle, and if someone wanted to get to the women's race article but didn't know the title of it, the men's race would be the likeliest place to look. Maybe a single sentence in the "Route and stages"

2510:

Hey so I've wrapped up the Merckx article and I was wondering if you could do a small favor and look over the legacy section? I personally think its the weakest section. I'm not saying you have to make any changes just suggest some things - if you catch anything - and I'll take care of it. If you

2485:

What you should have done, if you had an actual reason to revert the edit, was specify that reason in the edit summary. What you shouldn't have done was use infantile summaries like "reverting IP fail", "fix IP fail", and respond to warnings with comments like "Aahahaha move along pathetic IP".

1376:

Wow! I'm speechless, I struggle to upload a single pic :) Thanks for all your help. Now I really don't know what to expect from the GA try, but I bet this'll help a lot. I give you half of whatever bragging rights we get. My fear is they'll ask me to do a startlist. That would be a pain. Wait and

3055:

You know what, that does seem to ring a bell now. I may look to reconsider those nominations now, considering the timeframe of the most recent GA nominations. Might add the rest in due course, but I'm not too sure how I will space them. Mind you, they would probably need to have those 2015-style

1300:

That works really well. Yea, that course map needed to stay. I didn't realise until recently about the publishers, so don't worry. I'm not exactly amazing with English, but I can definitely help with making the wording a bit more easier for the average reader to understand what's going on, or at

878:

It's a fascinating watch, considering I never got round to buying the book. I plumped for Étape when I was buying a Richard Moore book. It's currently sitting on a shelf right now, with a train stub sticking out of it as a bookmark. So progress hasn't gone well on that one! Yeah, I know what you

3031:

Ah, the 2012 Tour... I think that was the last Tour that I actually had the patience to sit and type up a report each night. 2012 season as a whole was my last full season of writing; think I had gotten up to Romandie in 2013 and my PC packed in for several days and never got around to actually

2122:

I'll have go at the table for the prizes. The KoM probably needs one too. Lol, I took them out because I didn't see the point, but If there's enough text it'll work. I've only heard of the 'big four'. A GA nom is only for the page nomed. Is the stages correct? Looking at the ref to the official

2267:

Well, the article looks pretty good thanks to you! I totally stopped writing the stages though (on the 2 sub-pages). Still writing a little résumé of stages on the main page though. How are ya? Sagan is making one hell of a show, I can't wait to see if there are some fireworks left in those GC

2290:

Hey Matt, yes it does! More improvements to come... I don't blame you for stopping with the stages. At least there's a preview for 12–21. Could mention Froome's data release on the rest day? As a Brit I'm always going to say Froome, but if he wasn't there, then Quintana.

846:

every July. Ah, 1986. A fabulous choice. Watching the Slaying of the Badger documentary again has reminded me that I need to pick up the latest Hinault book authored by William Fotheringham. That and the Merckx 69 book. And a bookcase to store them all... Woe is me!

3531:

Gidday, u noticed that you edited the wiki page on coventry eagles and I was wondering if you had any more info on the n35 flying 350? I have one in my garage in bits that I inherited from my grandad and am really keen to start the restoration. Cheers

3246: 865:

I only just watched it last night. Yea, I think I'll have to add the Hinault one to the collection. The Merckx one is a maybe considering it's price tag. I think I need another bookcase because I now have piles of cycling books all over the place.

2741:

Hi! I have not been around much for the last 2 weeks, and will continue to take it easy maybe until the Canadian races. Just wanted to say I'm still alive, pretty busy and appreciating the work you do :) We'll sure talk later. Long live cycling.

1910:

The poor guy's a lone rider. Bad move to Saxo IMO. Martin's a nice guy and didn't deserve that, but it looked like he caused it. I take it you mean the ITN will be as the TdS was. It's by far the most well know bike race so it really should be.

1277:

I had an idea, go see the article again. I put Spilak's pic in the infobox, moved Dumoulin's pic from the first to the ninth stage (he is in TT outfit, so it fits) and put the stage 1 course on the right since a space was liberated. How's that?

2058:

Someone took out the rest days headers, but I think it would be a fantastic window of opportunity to cite a lot of riders talking about the race heading into the mountains. (as there is bound to be a ton of interviews tomorrow) What say you?

1213:; some of the rules may have been removed/changed, but over the years I've picked up the style I believe is accepted. Also, I'd take out one of the images in the Stage 1 section to avoid bookending the prose, but I'll leave that up to you. 807:

Glad to see the hard work paid off in the end. Ah, so I see; hopefully, we can get that date for the article to be shown, considering it's the only option for that date at this moment in time! Any other GA/FA targets in the pipeline?

2802:

Congrats on getting the article to FA status a while back, and marking the 50th anniversary in a few days' time by getting him to the front page - fabulous effort by all involved and credit to you for the bulk of the work!

1094:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 1087:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

3492:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1440:

My intention wasn't to get bragging rights, but to help out the project. Tell me about it, even hard when they have TT helmets covering half their faces. If you enjoy it I uploaded more from the same user:

2020:

Don't worry they'll be more people helping. I'm trying to sort out the main article, maybe go for GA? Need to beef that lead up. I'm going to make an English version of the map and one for stage one.

2032:

Why not, let's try GA :) It would be cool to insert the money prizes like there is on the French Knowledge (XXG), but I'm total crap at formatting. I tried to copy and paste them but it didn't work.

1049:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 986:. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 2848: 1418:

I've categorized like 15-20 pics you imported with the riders' names, it's a pity they don't tell their names on flickr either. I just realized that I'm not that great at recognising riders lol

1473:, the 'statistics' section. do you think it is OK? I'll look at the pics you uploaded and try to categorize them by rider, so cool you found a flickr user willing to share his/her work. :) 1394:

16:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC) PS: I meant we get the same bragging rights, which is at the maximum a GA template and at the minimum, the ITN template, which they failed to deliver so far (?)

3458:

I would've never thought that piping those would be a problem because it's what I would've done it manually any way, but if it's a AWB rule I'll refrain from it in the future. Thanks.

757:

it was AWB that spurred the "lowest first" whenever I've done references. I do think it is the semi-automated systems that do change them down the line, if they are not done manually.

3260:

No man might be able to win all three Grand Tours in one year, but for the first time, all three articles of one year are now good articles. Thank you for your contributions to this!

3032:

writing it up. But nowadays, what with work and everything else, I don't think I could ever get back to those levels. Yeah, I'll get around to nominating per your suggestion of the

3140: 737:. There's a few instances of ref numbers not being lowest first, e.g. in the Grand Tour general classification results timeline, but I don't see that causing too much trouble. 3384:

Hi BB. I've just seen your big list of AWB edits, which look really good corrections. There are a couple of problems, though, with references and images. See, for example,

1923:

No I meant if we do nothing, the TDF article is going to look like crap when on ITN. I was just giving you a heads up if you want to participate, it seems nobody but this

2875:

Hello, i saw you worked on the Knowledge (XXG) articles of the Vuelta a Espana and you have high experience in Knowledge (XXG). I worked out an article about stage 11 on

997:

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

2957:

I can understand your opinion, but this the way the results are currently presented on Knowledge (XXG)'s cycling arictles. This is just something you'll have accept.

2036:

Also, do the 2 pages describing the stages have to be GA quality as well? At least this is a huge race, even if we were to fail, a nice article will stay on forever.

3056:

tables added into them. A few dead ones is more than good enough for me! Ah, I meant good topic. I still had the featured topic in my head from previously. My bad!

909: 733:

Good to see it at FAC. I've proposed a second date if 13 July doesn't become sufficient for some reason. 5 September would mark 50 years since the world title for

3350:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2652:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2303:

Yeah, anyway, we'll have time to describe the stages later when less busy, the TdF references are always plentiful and easy to find. Enjoy the rest of the Tour

987: 1512:

Thanks for the great edit! We ended up edit conflicting, but that's OK, your edit was far better than mine. I am totally discouraged by everything asked. :(

1081: 990:

is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an

1179:

Hi BaldBoris, thanks for your edits on the article, but why change the images emplacements and sizes? Is there some kind of policy about that? Regards.

991: 2783:

Thanks for renaming these. I realised after I'd uploaded them that they were bad names, but I couldn't work out how to move them. Greatly appreciated!

1652:, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 3681: 3009: 1998:

Despite my nicest efforts, non-talkative IP didn't come back :( I wrote pretty short reports for the last two stages. If you ever want to chip in...

1155: 998: 675: 619: 563: 507: 451: 395: 339: 283: 2699:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1099: 1095: 1042: 1002: 2233:

No idea my friend, just keep doing what you're doing. What a stage today though. It looks like the race is now all about who'll come second.

3337: 2899: 2686: 2639: 3517: 2487: 3092:

Would be good to see that at FA. Continue the theme with getting main GT race articles up to FA, like Disc Wheel has done with the Giros.

2922:

Undermined by road cycling, track cycling is a great discipline by its own, so I think is just to separate the road and track palmares.

1490:

19:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC) PS: categorized what I could on the 2014 Tour de Suisse. Some great shots! Shame I recognize only a minority :(

1364:

No worries. I'm happy to help you out. Glad to see you got on ITN. I've just added 242 photos of stages 1 & 2 to Commons from Flickr.

1546:

I found a ref for the obligation to invite all UCI teams on the damn UCI site, but I can't find a ref for the 8 riders max per teams :(

776:

I see Simpson has made FA. Superb work there, sir! Absolutely delighted to see it at such a level - a rare FA cycling article! Chapeau.

1653: 1446: 982:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Knowledge (XXG) may not meet the criteria required by 2245:

He's head and shoulder above the rest. I think Nibali will pull a "stomach problem" stunt and pull out. It's almost embarrassing lol

3539: 220: 213: 206: 199: 192: 185: 178: 164: 157: 150: 143: 136: 1888:

article gets ITN automatically? I try to help the IP writing it, he's not a master at references, but his reports are pretty good!

2564: 2525: 1225:

Thank you. Zwerg Nase told me he was going to review it for GA on July 1st, as there is some kind of reviewing festival it seems

3307:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3211:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2895: 2879:. Things went wrong. Maybe some external opinion can help to find a solution. Do you know someone who could act as a mediator?-- 2609:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3513: 2938: 2433:

has been given Pending changes protection for 2 weeks, I saw your nomination and thought i'd just keep you up to date. Thanks,

1454: 1450: 65: 1073: 1080:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

319: 3665:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2993:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1139:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 659:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 603:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 547:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 491:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 435:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 379:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 323:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 267:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1442: 994:; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. 543: 375: 2550:

I appreciate it. As for FA, I'm considering it, but I'll be returning to school soon so that throws a wrench into things.

3670: 2998: 1961: 1144: 1054: 1038: 1033: 983: 664: 608: 552: 496: 440: 384: 328: 272: 1740: 1630: 3504:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3509: 3146:

Hi BaldBoris. I just want to say thanks for your help with getting this to FL standard. Your edits improved it a lot!

599: 2989: 2902:. The reason is articles get stale fast on Wikinews. So i don't want to search too much for help neither too less.-- 2700: 1667: 1135: 118: 80: 3279: 3183: 2581: 1949:

Oh right, the main article needs to be up to scratch. I'll be up for that and might help cleanup the stage pages.

795:

Thank you Craig. It's been a grind, but I crossed the finish line. I've requested the date you suggested for TFA.

655: 263: 3600:

I should have put it with in a see also section as I did with the 2015 Tour but forgot. Good job on the article.

487: 3554:

Sorry dude I'm a bicycle guy and have only added the navbox at the bottom of the page. Good luck with the bike.

231: 3351: 2696: 2653: 1869: 1209:

No worries, I want see your hard work rewarded. I'll have a closer look to see if I can help further. Yea it's

3661: 2491: 3573: 1736: 978: 3543: 3535: 2926: 2876: 3628: 3414:

Yea just realised the Vuelta one did. Generally only a few don't get picked up, so it's worth it I think.

3397: 3151: 2859: 2788: 1924: 1711: 95: 3505: 1663: 431: 699: 3612:

Duh, yes, the see also section is the obvious solution. Sometimes I can't see the wood for the trees!

3370: 3323: 3265: 3227: 3223: 3218: 3017: 2752: 2719: 2672: 2625: 2558: 2551: 2519: 2512: 2389: 2366: 2321: 2278: 2255: 2221: 2199: 2177: 2146: 2091: 2069: 2046: 2008: 1974: 1937: 1898: 1855: 1830: 1782: 1639: 1609: 1556: 1522: 1500: 1483: 1428: 1404: 1387: 1352: 1330: 1288: 1265: 1243: 1189: 3481: 3472: 2379:

The final teams classification of the TdS is fucked up as a result, do you know how to repair that?

826:

I can't see any reason why it won't get that date. After a couple of attempts I'm going to give the

3604: 3558: 3462: 3418: 3333: 3290: 3283: 3194: 3187: 3172: 3121: 3111: 3099: 3081: 3063: 3043: 2961: 2934: 2840: 2769: 2682: 2635: 2592: 2585: 2542: 2459: 2413: 2353: 2295: 2237: 2162: 2127: 2024: 1990: 1953: 1915: 1885: 1876: 1817: 1774: 1647: 1538: 1470: 1461: 1368: 1305: 1217: 1173: 950: 935: 919: 886: 870: 854: 834: 827: 815: 799: 783: 764: 744: 717: 127: 51: 17: 3501: 3485: 1695: 2907: 2884: 1084:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 237: 3298: 3202: 2825: 2600: 2033: 3624: 3578: 3409: 3393: 3347: 3163: 3147: 2855: 2844: 2784: 2649: 1728: 1700: 1107: 1010: 683: 627: 571: 515: 459: 403: 347: 291: 3572:

I don't disagree with your revert; but I think there needs to be some connection between the

3497: 3489: 3431:(there were others in the same vein). Replacing a working redirect link with a piped link is 1534:

Ha ha, I had a feeling that was going to happen. Oh well, I'm sure we'll get it done my man.

931:

Thanks for the lookout Craig! I think I'll need to ask someone for some help with the blurb.

3623:

I've put it into the "route and stages" section as well – I think it's definitely relevant.

1691: 233: 3500:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3493: 706:

thing. I despair at it. Do we change the previous GA and FA races to match this frankly...

3693: 3689: 3632: 3618: 3607: 3587: 3561: 3547: 3521: 3465: 3445: 3436:

pointless edit with another one, but please refrain from making such edits in the future.

3421: 3401: 3374: 3366: 3361: 3327: 3319: 3314: 3269: 3261: 3231: 3175: 3155: 3127: 3105: 3087: 3069: 3049: 3021: 3013: 2964: 2942: 2911: 2888: 2863: 2812: 2808: 2792: 2772: 2759: 2743: 2723: 2715: 2710: 2676: 2668: 2663: 2629: 2621: 2616: 2571: 2545: 2532: 2495: 2480: 2476: 2462: 2442: 2438: 2416: 2403: 2396: 2380: 2373: 2357: 2328: 2312: 2298: 2285: 2269: 2262: 2246: 2240: 2228: 2212: 2206: 2190: 2184: 2168: 2153: 2137: 2130: 2098: 2082: 2076: 2060: 2053: 2037: 2027: 2015: 1999: 1993: 1981: 1965: 1956: 1944: 1928: 1918: 1905: 1889: 1879: 1862: 1846: 1837: 1821: 1803: 1786: 1778: 1744: 1717: 1671: 1616: 1600: 1563: 1547: 1541: 1529: 1513: 1507: 1491: 1474: 1464: 1435: 1419: 1411: 1395: 1378: 1371: 1359: 1343: 1337: 1321: 1308: 1295: 1279: 1272: 1256: 1250: 1234: 1220: 1204: 1196: 1180: 1167: 1163: 1111: 1014: 956: 938: 925: 892: 873: 860: 837: 821: 802: 789: 770: 750: 723: 687: 631: 575: 519: 463: 407: 351: 295: 3666: 3294: 3198: 2994: 2596: 1599:

For GA, is it always this way? I would have trashed all this if it wasn't for your help.

1140: 1082:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

660: 604: 548: 492: 436: 380: 324: 268: 235: 3601: 3555: 3459: 3441: 3415: 3169: 3116: 3094: 3076: 3058: 3038: 2958: 2952: 2930: 2766: 2539: 2468: 2456: 2410: 2292: 2234: 2159: 2124: 2021: 1987: 1950: 1912: 1873: 1535: 1458: 1365: 1302: 1214: 945: 932: 914: 881: 867: 849: 831: 810: 796: 778: 759: 739: 712: 37: 1727:

Hello BaldBoris, I'm Emperorofthedaleks, I noticed how you uploaded the title card of

2903: 2880: 2538:

Sure I'll have a proper look when I get a chance. Will you take it to FA eventually?

2835:

Thank you for quality articles on cycling and the tours' people and places, such as

2136:

Err what did you take out and what ref says what is not correct? lol I don't get it

3613: 3595: 3582: 3357: 3310: 3214: 2706: 2691: 2659: 2612: 2430: 1103: 1006: 679: 623: 567: 511: 455: 399: 343: 287: 943:

Think the blurb looks perfect right now! I can't imagine any changes being made!

3245: 2836: 1732: 126:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2268:

contenders :) I don't have a particular favorite for GC. I like them all. You?

1024: 3685: 2804: 2472: 2450: 2434: 2409:

nominated 2015 TdF for GA. I think it may need a further detailed going over.

1210: 1159: 3392:. These break both the image links and the reference links, so do take care! 3453: 3437: 3110:

Yeah. I remember starting looking at doing the classification table for the

3036:

good topic. I don't know how many of the refs are still working mind you...

2765:

Cheers for the update dude. Hope you had a relaxing time on that hammock...

2733: 2081:

I got a citation from each of the major 5 GC contenders for the rest day :)

1845:

I'm no formatting czar, how do you get the GA template atop your userpage??

1816:

For sticking with me when I was discouraged and your remarkable work on the

1758: 28: 2900:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cycling#Offtopic_but_urgent:_Cycling_on_Wikinews

1731:

from YouTube to the article and was wondering if you could do the same for

3289:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

3193:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

2591:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1884:

Another deception for Sagan. And what a shame for Martin! I wonder if the

1469:

That's the spirit, this is how I see things too. I added a section to the

1076:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 1045:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 702:

introduced such a season setup for the articles. It's laughable. Even the

1872:

is what you use to get the icon at the top. Only 7 km left in the stage!

3342: 2644: 1682: 3488:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3303: 3207: 2605: 2167:

I dunno. Better forget about this lol. Froome has beaten them all :)

1986:

Oh dear, silly boy. How on earth did he think he'd get away with it.

2356:? Were those templates modified?? I thought they were looking good. 1255:

Unless you see something else that could help it get carried to GA?

3168:

No worries, I'm always happy to improve cycling-related articles.

2732: 1698:

policy. The more references an article has the better. Thank you.

3074:

Both passed with very few changes needing to be made. Excellent.

2471:

how do we cope with the IP re-adding the non notable red links?

301:

Orphaned non-free image File:Belkin Pro Cycling Team jersey.png

1625: 238: 3577:

mentioning that it occurred before the final stage? (Pinging

2486:

Your disruptive intention could not have been more obvious.

525:

Orphaned non-free image File:Omega Pharma-Quick Step logo.svg

357:

Orphaned non-free image File:Belkin Pro Cycling Team logo.png

3648: 2976: 2211:

What could I do to help, besides writing the short reports?

1122: 1069:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

1023: 968: 642: 586: 530: 474: 418: 362: 306: 250: 2843:, for templates and sticking with a discouraged, - quoting 1041:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 1037:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 965:

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:FDJ.fr jersey.png

908:

FYI, TFA requests now accepting September 5 for placement

2352:

Holy crap, what happened to the result templates in the

1020:

Replaceable fair use File:Trek Factory Racing jersey.png

3428: 3389: 3385: 1687: 1090: 1059:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 581:

Orphaned non-free image File:Patersons Stadium logo.png

110: 3680: