User talk:Buidhe/Archive 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

4907:

of Pakistan Wrestling Production." This is commercial statement to promote one small gym named as PWP. This statement has no authentic source of any good site. This article has 8 references but all about native wrestling which is altogether a different game than PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING. "Wrestling in Pakistan, known locally as koshti (Urdu: کشتی‬‎), has been practiced since ancient times, mainly in Punjab (Pehlwani) and Sindh (Malakhra). Now Professional Wrestling has also been introduced in Pakistan. In Karachi the Port City of Pakistan a group of young individuals have initiated a Pro-Wrestling promotion by the name of Pakistan Wrestling Production (PWP). PWP is the current running facility of Professional wrestling in Pakistan located near teen talwar clifton ,the most prime location of Karachi. PWP also deals in health, fitness, women empowerment, self-defense and encounter violence/extremism." is completely a promotinal adevertisement which is against the rules of WIKI. My article is developed from authentic sources and it is purely informative with no intention to promote any single commercial entity. You can go through the references. I have gathered all the data from A+ category sources and developed very authentic article on professional wrestling which shall be beneficial for the readers. Since, I am from PAKISTAN and both articles are written in the context of Pakistan, the references shall help you in gauging the motive behind articles. I request you to consider it publishing to help readers to get the right and authentic information. Kind Regards

2639:

considering most historians and linguists base their orthodox view of the history on historical sources (such as Duan Albanach) from hundreds of years later which are also full of blatantly mythical tales such as that of Albanus and Brutus conquering Britain and dividing it between them. Or on Bede who also claimed the Picts originated in Scania (modern day Scandinavia and Eastern Europe), neither Brutus/Albanus or the Picts Scanian origins are accepted as credible historical fact, and rightly so.

4550: 3876: 3607: 3519: 31: 2425: 2635:

of criticism or argument against what he proposes a good sign of that? It could just as easily be argued it was a sign historians/linguists and academics had no response to it or defense for the orthodox position. Surely at least ONE of them would come and casually dismantle his argument, should be absolutely easy with his unqualified status and the fact what he has presented is not even worthy of discussion.

4998: 2837: 4472: 4148: 4089: 1824: 1582: 770: 4523: 2180: 1399: 1287: 539: 4671: 4021: 4413: 3421: 3683: 3167: 4362: 4285: 3986: 3484: 3370: 3315: 2951: 2896: 2786: 2731: 471: 2694:

murky events theorised on and agreed upon. I actually emailed Ewan Campbell himself using his University of Glasgow email address to ask what kind of criticism and counteraguments he has received, since he has continued to present this theory many times since publishing the paper, whatever these are have not seemed to dissuade his beliefs.

862: 2346:, but I noticed "the GOCE review greatly improved the prose issues but some problems remain" which I am not sure how to read. If you would prefer not to have a second opinion from me (the GOCE copy editor) could you say so. No need to give an explanation, just a "I would prefer a different editor": I won't take offense. 3000:. I was going to leave them a message explaining that without secondary sources this article doesn't pass notability criteria but because you have accepted an article with the same sourcing I would like to hear your views before sending a message. I know that AFC is not an exact science but step 2 seems pretty clear. -- 4906:

has written every thing but Professional Wrestling. There is one statement about professional wrestling in this article which says "Professional Wrestling of Pro-Wrestling is the modern form of wrestling which is followed in Pakistan, An academy based in Karachi is promoting Pro-Wrestling by the name

2634:

Have you ever read the paper out of interest? He discussed in some depth the historical and linguistic reasonings relied upon by supporters of the orthodox viewpoint as well, and why they are not reliable, that's why I'm asking for academic criticism or rejection of his theory. How on Earth is a lack

2392:

I suspected that was the case, but did not want to put you in an embarrassing situation if I was wrong. That was an interesting piece of research. I am not sure why you have found it so difficult to persuade the nominator to accurately reflect the sources, but you seem to have got there. I have watch

1765:

Waffen-SS veterans in post-war Germany played a large role, through publications and political pressure, in the partially successful efforts to rehabilitate the severely tainted organisation in Germany, which had acquired a reputation of brutality towards civilians, ethnic minorities and prisoners of

838:

a little while back, and never received them. Apologies for the bot not working as it should, I'm keeping a closer eye on it now. I've deleted the template from your talk page for now, feel free to add it again whenever you'd like some suggestions for articles to edit, and let me know if you have any

259:

Thank you for nominating the article for DYK. I took the liberty to propose an alternative hook as your suggestion, also quite good, has some referencing problems. Depending which source you take the number of survivors is quoted as 9, 12 and 18. No hard-and-fast number there that is reliable but you

2373:

Quite the contrary, I think your GOCE review was thorough and fixed most of the problems—thank you! There are limits to what any copyeditor can do, and I'm not sure if the current state of the article would pass 1a—perhaps you could shed light on that. Anyway, I would greatly appreciate your opinion

4944:

article, it seemed to be intended to give an overview of all kinds of wrestling in Pakistan, both traditional and modern. The information currently in your draft would fit nicely in place of the current subsection for Professional wrestling. Alternatively, if you cited all information in your draft

2697:

People can have no interest in challenging an orthodox view without genuinely believing in the orthodox view, no matter how much the evidence suggests otherwise. The Scotland article on this very site still lists the nation's founding as 843, even though we know the term Alba was not used until the

1895:

I have reused content from other articles that I created or contributed myself and I wasn't sure whether this would not make it ineligible. On a different note, I had a look at the USHMM website but it is as you have said, volume III is not available as a free download as yet. I was however able to

1865:

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't

504:

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and

424:

I don't see how focusing on things that would cause the article deleted in mainspace is necessarily a bad way to review, especially since that's what the AfC process is built around. If you look at my reviewing, I do look for other policy violations especially BLP. Recently, I've been cautious when

4785:

The term "business exits" is not common in English; I've never heard it before. Replace with something less jargony. There is still no citation for "Chairman of the Board of Directors of Itamar Medical (since 1997)", or his children. I am not familiar enough with business sources to evaluate their

3037:

That's fine the editor is adding secondary sources now but that should really have been done at the draft phase especially if you yourself found some. That is really the idea of AFC, experienced editors who review and advise les experienced editors' work so that it arrives in mainspace with a good

4964:

Thank you for having a look. I have republished the article. There is a lot more information which I will add in to it once the article is published. My article is very specific. It is about Professional Wrestling and its existence in one specific country, Pakistan. It has just started growing in

2677:

by Sally Forster has 160 cites in just four years, while the Campbell paper has only 80 cites over the last 18 years, indicating that Forster's view (whatever that is) is much more popular. That's just the results from a very cursory search and I'm sure there are more relevant works that could be

3942:

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at

3022:

There aren't any secondary sources used in the article, but a Google News search revealed what appeared to be enough secondary coverage to meet GNG. Therefore, I decided to approve the article because it wasn't obviously promotional. I'm not an expert on sports sources, and if I'm mistaken about

2693:

Okay thank you for the recommendation, was totally oblivious to Google Scholar. I would say again lack of cites does not necessarily mean he is incorrect, which is why I look for actual academic criticism or rejection of his suggestions or points. History is a lie agreed upon, right? Or dubious,

2564:

Sorry to intrude, but since you made your comments about Ewan Campbell's theories, it has got me thinking. Obviously I'm fairly supportive of the theory, it would much more fit my own beliefs on Insular Celtic languages and how they diverged within the British Isles, and I see it quite a lot on

368:

Thanks! When I'm at AfC, I mostly look for the blatant issues—promotion, notability, verifiiability, and copyvio—and get it out of the queue as quickly as posssible. It is a BLP1E, but an obvious alternate title wasn't occurring to me. There are some cases where it makes more sense to keep the

2638:

I get the concept of Knowledge (XXG), and I'm not railing against the way things are here, which is why I am on your personal talk page and not the talk page of articles, but I suggest you actually read what the orthodox viewpoint is actually based on before waving off Ewan Campbell's theory,

128:

etc. trying to add all victims and survivors would make the category unreasonably large. If you think it's important to have a category for Italian Jewish Holocaust survivors, you can create such a category. I would think that there are enough Italian Jewish Holocaust survivors to make that

5010:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1443: 1958:

p. 476; 8,000 Jews died, 40,000 survived. P. 245; first Jews sent to German death camp (Auschwitz) on 16 September, 24 of them, including a 6 year old. Let me know if you need a source for the dates of German occupation - 8 September 1943 to 2 May 1945, 20 months.

2602:

Actually, the lack of academic discussion of his theories is a pretty good sign that most academics don't think that they are worth discussing. Since he is an archaeologist, not a linguist or historian, he is not necessarily considered an expert in this area per

2672:

article, you will have to include more viewpoints than just Campbell's. I would recommend searching Google Scholar and using the citation count as a rough indication of how accepted the view is, with a bias towards more recent works. For example, the 2014 book

2995:

because there are no secondary sources whatsoever to show independent notability and I would like to know on what basis you accepted the above article. For me as there are no secondary sources independent of the article the reviewing process fails at step 2.

1896:

download the index (23 pages long!). From what I gather, you having send me the Fossoli and Borgo content, you have access to volume III? In regards to the Italian camps after September 1943 I image it would have some content that would enrich the article?

4743:, you are expected to cite reliable sources for the companies he founded (currently there is no citations for P-Cube or Hyperwise), the personal life section, and all other sections. Also, what in a "business exit"? While you're at it, drop the "Dr." per 4319:

for your tacit support regarding the Jewish paradise DYK attempt, which I left at K.e's talk page. I know the proposer is an ancient WP vet, but we can all get the vibe wrong sometimes on a subject, and I sense P has temporarily lost sensitivity on this.

4578: 4562: 2568:

You suggested most historians and linguists do not find his theory credible, can you provide me with some sources for this. I'm very interested to heard these opposing views. Or defense of the orthodox views, I suppose would be more apt.

2572:

I also suggested a criticism section for the Ewan Campbell article so that we can see why exactly his views are not agreed upon by historians and linguists. Because obviously I've never heard any academic criticisms of his theory.

2153:

Haló, a Chatrìona. Tha móran obair mhath dèanta agad an-seo agus tha meas agam air an obair sin, ach cha do thuig mi an t-alt a tha dèanta agad air Àdhamh. Chan eil Àdhamh ainmeil idir, agus cha bhi alt againn air. Mholainn dhut

1938:. I noticed this while passing by. I can't help you with your sources - although IMHO you are asking in the right place. But in your proposed hook you probably mean although, not "also" and "The" should have a lower case 't'. 506: 3081:

Hi, I know I accepted your new hook for the image slot at DYK, but upon further thought, I don't think the hook is catchy enough for the lead slot. I wonder if you would consider something simpler and more direct, like:

4597:

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Knowledge (XXG) that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other

4197: 5038: 2997: 1868: 510: 909: 2218: 4193: 4186: 3834:

people in the wiki. The main issue is that you only cite the subject's own publications so it's hard to tell if he is notable (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). I suggest that you take a look at

1828: 3796:

I was curious as to why my submission for Albert Diaz was recently rejected? The subject is certainly needed in the Knowledge (XXG) database. What can I edit in order to resubmit and have it accepted?

231:

never mind, the Italian camps don't seem to be covered in the first volume as I thought. I'm guessing that they're in the third volume, which was just published a few months ago and is not online yet.

5022:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3847:

source confirming that he meets one of the criteria in ARTIST or that there is sufficient independent coverage for GNG, then the article can be published. A secondary issue is that, since this is a

3694: 1814: 1807: 1430: 1418: 457: 450: 3703: 3187: 4604: 1221: 1045: 943: 1626: 4684: 4026: 1204: 977: 1079: 1028: 4624: 3699: 3183: 2678:

found with other keywords. If you'd like to expand the article, be my guest, but you have to use a neutral summary of mainstream scholarly work, without pushing any particular POV.

574: 1113: 1062: 514: 425:

it's not clear (esp. with notability), leaving the difficult cases for more experienced reviewers. The issue raised here is not one that has to be fixed at AfC, in my opinion.

2441:" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on 926: 700:

tools, as having some issues to fix. More citations for verification would be nice - an inline cite after every bullet point for a page that doesn't exist yet would be great.

4949:(not Knowledge (XXG)) and identified a few additional sources, it could qualify as a stand-alone article. I wonder if there is more information available in other languages? 1643:

Hello, Catrìona, another reply. I've revised an article we might want to link to, and tightened up the hook to make a new suggestion. The hook accidentally got promoted, but

505:

processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available

3938:

Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

2604: 1916:

I also have to look into the May 1945 thing actually, as Germany surrendered in Italy in April already and deportations and killings may have stopped at this point already.

2988: 1991:

Edit: I just emailed you the USHMM overview on Italian camps, hope it will be helpful. I've added the two following variations on your suggestion to the DYK page, thanks!

4592:

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

2981: 3525: 3518: 2302:

I've added an infobox to the article which includes the image you added to the nomination. I have one additional question for you. There is a corresponding article to

1011: 1187: 1164: 1096: 886: 4420:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 3428:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 1330: 730: 2402:

Whilst working on this I noticed your Germany barnstar appear and disappear. Richly deserved. It is nice to know that someone is keeping an eye on these things.

994: 3922: 3932:

You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.

3913: 2701:

But anyway, Scottish Gaelic in general is not my 'specialist' subject, hahaha, more history itself. Thank you for your time, check out that paper some day!

1238: 1147: 960: 3532: 166: 2237:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1462:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1349:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

593:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1987:

is debateable. The restriction on copied content does not apply if at least 1,500 characters of new text were added, which I presumed was the case here.

4611: 4241:

Just making the point asking to "gain" someone's vote sounds a lot like canvassing, which is a no-no. I have reminded Sammartinlai about that. Cheers,

3848: 2565:

Knowledge (XXG) on a great many articles, I've read his paper and find it to be quite convincing, I was wondering why you feel this is not the case?

4479:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

4155:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

4096:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

3582:, where the content obviously did not belong. I am working on other articles right now and have no interest in digging up references for this list. 1831:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

1589:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

777:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

125: 4902:

this article is about Native wrestling. It is poles apart from professional wrestling. Please read both articles and you will find the difference.

178: 1586: 4583:, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is 3929:

not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.

2668:

I am actually focusing on other areas right now, as you can see by looking at my recent contributions. However, if you would like to improve the

1130: 1723:

I feel guilty about you nominating all these articles for DYK while I do so little in this regard! Thanks also for your support & help with

4093: 1724: 703:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

260:

could change it to percentages, as I have done in the article. Whichever figure you believe the number of survivors is less than five percent.

1955: 4466: 4407: 4142: 4083: 3415: 2844:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

2831: 1818: 1576: 764: 5052: 2646: 2619:

is really a well-sourced, neutral discussion of the decline of the languages in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and early twentieth centuries.

2580: 1979:

One could argue that the Holocaust of Italian Jews was still ongoing in early May because some were probably transferred from Auschwitz to

1877: 522: 329:

Hi there! I've seen ya around AfC, and so felt it about time to introduce myself, so hi! I was a bit curious about your recent approval of

245:

Thanks yet again for your efforts. If you should find that the current article title is not the common one it is easily enough to move it.

216: 2261: 2234: 1459: 1346: 590: 4271: 4264: 3890:

in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as

3553: 2343: 2333: 690: 169:

but I would appreciate your opinion on the name of the article as I'm not sure whether it is quite correct or whether it was more of an

904: 875: 513:

by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the

2772: 2765: 2315: 2307: 2208: 2199: 1572: 1565: 3727: 2611:. We just report what is said in reliable sources, emphasizing the most respected scholars/publications. What is most lacking in the 4079: 4072: 3972: 3965: 3747: 2937: 2930: 2101: 1763:

Thank you anyway. A request: Can you think of how to better re-phrase the first sentence in Waffen-SS veterans in post-war Germany:

309: 212: 211:

Thanks for all the great work you are doing! Drancy is not the best example because it is really a transit camp. I will look at the

4618:

which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

4764:

Okay, I made all the changes. Business Exits is when you sell companies, I edit it. Should I resubmit or you would like to check?

2115:

Reviewed. Historically notable photograph with extensive, in depth coverage in WP:RS. Thanks for taking the initiative to create!

121: 4365:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

4288:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

4049: 3989:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3487:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3373:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

3318:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2954:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2899:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2789:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2734:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2481: 2128: 1537: 474:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

5048: 4152: 1873: 518: 182: 95: 5031: 2264:! It got over 18,000 views. Congrats again on the amazing article. I read it from top to bottom and enjoyed it a lot. Cheers, 697: 4980: 4922: 2215:, where more than a thousand corpses were found, was described as "the most horrifying example of Nazi terrorism imaginable"? 1783:‎ is my first. What needs to be done to improve the nomination? It would be a shame to lose the DYK because of inexperience. 612: 4236: 3689: 3173: 2608: 1749:

In fact, I quite enjoy nominating articles for DYK. I really appreciate that you create all this great content to nominate!

4650:

Maybe if Catriona won't change their name, you could add a number or letter after yours to differentiate. Just a thought.

3663: 2841: 2510:

Hi Catrìona, would you mind looking at this new article draft I created? This is my first and I would love your feedback.

774: 4946: 3905: 3894:, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the 3852: 2342:

You have been remarkably busy. I feel embarrassingly lazy by comparison. I was going to chip in with a second opinion on

2187: 2080:. Another user answered the request but it looks like they forgot to change the status back to on hold. I've fixed that. 1406: 1294: 546: 4880: 4057: 3096: 1426: 1320: 4603:

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also

3909: 1900:

But back to the DYK, I did think of a hook myself but have to find a reference that would support this exact statement:

1780: 5043: 4633: 2061:

to see about offering a second opinion. But I am not sure if it is still needed. If it is, give me a ping. Take care.

1989:

Yes, I have access to the entire encyclopedia, but I'm busy with other articles right now. I'll see what I can dig up.

1683:

Looks good but I think someone else will have to promote it, because I have contributed slightly to the current hook.

337:, didn't seem egregious enough to do much about, but felt it a good chance to say howdy and getchur thoughts! Thanks! 4722:

I saw you declined it again but i dont understand why since there are cites, please explain so i can make it better.

2827: 2820: 4707:

Dear Catriona, I have made all the changed on the draft and it's ready for a review. please have a look. thank you.

3900:. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you 3886:" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, do check back at 4480: 4156: 4138: 4131: 4097: 4035: 4034:

is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in

3765: 3088: 3075: 2882: 2875: 2717: 2710: 2669: 2616: 2519: 2469: 2303: 2238: 2224: 1832: 1661:

Hello, Catrìona. I'm sorry, may I ask you for one last look-over? I have taken your advice about parends to heart.

1590: 1463: 1449: 1350: 1336: 778: 594: 580: 330: 323: 81: 76: 71: 59: 38: 4451: 4392: 4337: 4260: 4127: 4068: 3961: 3459: 3400: 3345: 3290: 3060:

Ok Catriona, I removed the source from amazon and added four reliable, independent sources. Thank you, take care.

2926: 2871: 2816: 2761: 2706: 2446: 1911:

lasted for only 19 month, from September 1943 to May 1945, it still saw twenty percent of all Italian Jews killed?

1803: 1561: 749: 446: 1216: 3827: 2477: 120:

My understanding is that those categories were intended mainly for events. For many such categories, especially

3708: 3178: 2281: 1040: 938: 760: 753: 665:

Certainly it would be appropriate to link. You can edit the page yourself if you have an idea for improvement.

5019: 3844: 3756: 2650: 2584: 2541: 4682:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2998:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Reviewing_instructions#Step_2:_Notability_and_verifiability

291:

Thanks for the suggestions on improving the article. I corrected the tone and also added the awards section.

4876: 4053: 2992: 2698:

reign of Constantine II in 900 and Kenneth I was only ever listed as a King of Picts in historical sources.

1324: 1199: 972: 378: 4968: 4910: 4675: 3773: 3651: 2642: 2576: 2531: 2515: 297: 4246: 4225: 4210: 3579: 3539: 2860: 2805: 2750: 2407: 2356: 2066: 1964: 1907: 1851: 1609: 1074: 1023: 704: 490: 174: 2663: 2597: 1257: 854: 4941: 4325: 3809: 3741: 3334: 2192: 1411: 1299: 551: 305: 4954: 4843: 4791: 4752: 4608:

Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers'

4221: 4206: 3860: 3587: 3260: 3137: 3127: 3028: 2683: 2624: 2549: 2511: 2379: 2085: 1996: 1754: 1688: 819: 708: 670: 430: 386: 236: 222: 134: 3821: 3805: 3737: 2204:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1423:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1311:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 563:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 301: 3895: 3200: 3043: 3005: 1057: 738: 567: 558: 413: 400: 5006: 4838:

Unfortunately we have a bit of a backlog, but it's random and someone could pick it up at any time.

4533: 2311: 1983:

or other camps that were not liberated until early May, but whether that's part of the Holocaust in

1891:

Yet another DYK nomination! I haven't done it myself this time because I noticed this little rule: :

4972: 4935: 4914: 4895: 4693: 3891: 3429: 3065: 2323: 2250: 2038: 1921: 1732: 1475: 1362: 1270: 265: 250: 194: 148: 103: 5015: 3836: 4976: 4918: 4811: 4769: 4727: 4712: 4476: 4421: 3935:

If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.

3276: 3235: 2139: 2120: 2020: 2011: 1529: 921: 606: 350: 4356: 4279: 3980: 3478: 3364: 3309: 2945: 2890: 2780: 2725: 1701:

OK, sounds fair. I'll quote that there so that someone will. Thank you for all your work on it.

465: 334: 4679: 4655: 4549: 4417: 4304: 4242: 4175: 4116: 4031: 4005: 3875: 3659: 3641: 3624: 3606: 3503: 3425: 3145: 3104: 2970: 2915: 2856: 2851: 2801: 2796: 2746: 2741: 2496: 2454: 2403: 2368: 2352: 2077: 2062: 1960: 1952: 1847: 1842: 1605: 1600: 1510: 1494: 1444:

Template:Did you know nominations/Escape of Viktor Pestek and Siegfried Lederer from Auschwitz

1381: 844: 797: 715: 486: 481: 5027: 3887: 4950: 4839: 4803: 4787: 4761: 4748: 4321: 3856: 3583: 3561: 3330: 3325: 3256: 3252: 3221: 3123: 3024: 2679: 2620: 2545: 2375: 2163: 2081: 1992: 1980: 1792: 1750: 1684: 1619: 867: 815: 666: 649: 426: 382: 232: 218: 215:

and see what it says. Btw you can download the encyclopedia for free at the USHMM website :

130: 47: 17: 5030:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5023: 4740: 3926: 3840: 2442: 2155: 870:, This is an automated notification to remind you about unanswered peer review requests at 571:

are languages targeted for extermination, even when spoken by a majority of the population?

4861: 3949: 3191: 3039: 3017: 3001: 2612: 2058: 835: 734: 170: 4352: 4275: 3976: 3474: 3360: 3305: 3099:

included a children's block where youth were taught German, history, music, and Judaism?

2941: 2886: 2776: 2721: 1436: 1261: 871: 733:. When you have a moment, please respond there, and we can get this nomination approved. 461: 2424: 635:, whose speakers were, respectively, ridiculed for or banned from speaking the language. 4744: 4689: 4042: 3826:

First of all, welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! I've gone ahead and moved your submission to

3411: 3404: 3356: 3349: 3061: 2319: 2246: 2034: 1935: 1917: 1768:

I'm not quite comfortable with the word "rehabilitate" but can't think of a better one.

1744: 1728: 1706: 1666: 1652: 1634: 1471: 1358: 1266: 1006: 628: 261: 246: 206: 190: 144: 115: 99: 2537: 2221:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1446:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1333:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 577:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 4833: 4807: 4780: 4765: 4736: 4723: 4708: 4462: 4455: 4403: 4396: 4348: 4341: 3578:

Although I am listed as the creator of this article, all I did was split it off from

3272: 3247: 3231: 2135: 2108: 1544: 1517: 1182: 1091: 632: 602: 374: 363: 338: 4688:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

4651: 4610:, and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an 4499: 4486: 4471: 4440: 4427: 4381: 4368: 4300: 4295: 4291: 4171: 4166: 4162: 4147: 4112: 4107: 4103: 4088: 4038:. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with 4001: 3996: 3992: 3655: 3645: 3637: 3636:

Thanks for the cookies, but I prefer oatmeal raisin (they were still yummy though)

3620: 3619:

Thank you for your work on Holocaust-related articles, keep up the quality work :D

3499: 3494: 3490: 3470: 3463: 3448: 3435: 3389: 3376: 3321: 3301: 3294: 3141: 3122:

Personally, I prefer the Himmler hook, but I don't object to your suggestion here.

3117: 3100: 2966: 2961: 2957: 2911: 2906: 2902: 2847: 2792: 2737: 2492: 2488: 2473: 2450: 2272: 1838: 1823: 1784: 1644: 1596: 1581: 1490: 1377: 1315: 1306: 989: 840: 809: 793: 788: 784: 769: 477: 4997: 4529: 3912:. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the 3682: 3166: 2836: 2228: 1625:

Hi, Catrìona, I've revised the article and replied to your helpful suggestions at

1453: 1340: 584: 624:

Would you think it reasonable to link the other languages mentioned in Examples:

5056: 4984: 4958: 4926: 4884: 4847: 4815: 4795: 4773: 4756: 4731: 4716: 4697: 4659: 4639: 4503: 4444: 4385: 4329: 4308: 4250: 4229: 4214: 4179: 4120: 4061: 4009: 3954: 3864: 3831: 3813: 3714: 3667: 3628: 3591: 3573: 3565: 3557: 3542: 3507: 3452: 3393: 3338: 3280: 3264: 3239: 3209: 3149: 3131: 3108: 3069: 3047: 3032: 3009: 2974: 2919: 2864: 2809: 2754: 2687: 2654: 2628: 2588: 2553: 2523: 2500: 2458: 2411: 2383: 2360: 2327: 2291: 2254: 2179: 2167: 2159: 2143: 2089: 2070: 2042: 2015:

lasted for only a year and a half, twenty percent of Italian Jews were murdered?

2000: 1968: 1925: 1881: 1855: 1796: 1788: 1758: 1736: 1710: 1692: 1670: 1656: 1638: 1613: 1554: 1498: 1479: 1398: 1385: 1366: 1286: 1274: 848: 823: 801: 742: 719: 674: 660: 653: 645: 616: 538: 526: 494: 434: 419: 390: 370: 355: 313: 269: 254: 240: 226: 198: 152: 138: 107: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4670: 4020: 3944: 2449:. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – 1233: 1142: 955: 377:. On the other hand, if you felt it was appropriate to move to something like 2393:

listed the article and will keep an eye on it. (I suspect that you will too.)

1766:

war during World War II and had participated in a large number of war crimes.

4965:

Pakistan. It would be great if this article becomes available for readers.

1702: 1678: 1662: 1648: 1630: 2607:. Whether or not you are convinced by his theories is immaterial, see also 814:

Thank you so much for the review. It really helped me improve the article.

4903: 4899: 4860:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article

4347: