User talk:Buidhe/Archive 4 - Knowledge (XXG)

4887: 31: 4734: 4824:

from the results of my own research on various websites of the authorities that appear for different entities. On the other hand, the sites Rulers and World Statesmen are the most reliable sources in the field of arkhontology which can be easily accessed. That is why I kindly ask you to accept my article as it was written, because it cannot fit within the criteria of articles that describe a personality, an event, etc

4559: 5004: 1557: 1404: 2602: 2049: 5262: 4376: 4149: 4042: 2502: 2307: 2119: 1956: 1858: 1767: 1674: 1458: 1238: 1151: 248: 110: 2268: 891: 5021:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2466: 2411: 5146: 4243:

Hi, Much Love as a friend, Double Trouble Wrestling is an independent promotion, My other partner Francine Fournier herself and Major Gunns herself from WCW World Championship Wrestling both confirmed on Twitter when Major Gunns Tweeted recently asking fans to sign up for them to watch Double Trouble

1059:

Thanks so much Buidhe gottcha I was simply pinged because I have a page alert on all changes on the page or something. Wow it might have taken me awhile to get that. Could I just say your edit is awesome what you deleted was bordering on offensive is PS an abbreviation for primary source your "Pure

946:

Hello Buidhe, many thanks for your interest in my edit on the Éire page you gave the reason for the edit as "Pure OR" I'm sorry you have gone too technical for me there. What does that (OR) stand for or when you get a chance could you please point me to where I can research my error. Thanks again.

5388:

The move to the draft space was unwarranted. I have recreated the original article and have added some links and a couple of new references. I am currently adding pages for the entire republican contested primary. I have done this with hundreds of articles on US and World politics. Please don't do

4905:

discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to

4573:

For all your excellent work on Holocaust-related articles. A difficult subject area to work in on Knowledge (XXG), not just because of the actual subject matter, but the restrictions and sanctions in place. Thanks also for your other work, particularly in providing source reviews. Keep up the good

4823:

I must inform you with all due respect that this article is of the chronological list type. For such articles, it is not possible to insert citations, because such citations do not exist. I wrote this article starting from the data presented in the websites which I presented as External links and

3759:

instructions, after waiting five to seven days to see if anyone engages to address the issues, anyone can bring an article to FAR, subject to a) no more than one nomination every two weeks; and b) no more than four nominations on the page at one time, unless permission for more is given by a FAR

1003:

Thanks so much (OR got it). The most worrying thing is I hadn't made any edit (deliberately to that line) obviously wikipedia say I have. Is it Devileire and all that stuff? I totally agree with you eliminate all that joke junk. Should I be concerned about why the system flags me as editor?

4677:

For me it is the opposite, I come over many more mentions of the current institution. Most of the Google results are for it, but that could be recentism (they have a website and publish books, unlike the ones that don't exist anymore)! Anyway, since it is disputed I've moved it back.

1119:, Sorry, but it's not really my area of interest or expertise. I hope you find a reviewer soon. As an aside, in places it's not clear whether you're referring to the full 1606 epigram or the shorter Latin phrase, such as the first sentence of "Controversy over use at POLIN" section. 1995: 1583:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1430:

5189:

for details on what we do, which is basically checking if speedy deletion criteria are met, or else AfDing if the subject is unlikely to be notable. I specialize in articles that don't have inline citations to websites, which is why I've seen so many of your

197:

I've made improvements to the page to fill it out with more content and add citations. Does it look good to move back to mainspace? I'd like to get it up ahead of the premiere on Friday. Let me know what else I can do to improve it to meet mainspace quality.

5105:

It's advisable to list whenever you are copying content from elsewhere, even if it's public domain. That way the text is attributed to the correct source, and reviewers are not alarmed when there's a match on Earwig. The best way to do it is apparently the

287: 3987:

CAIT is a not only a website but a collection of tools to visualise climate change data from various sources and is often referenced by other sources. Wouldn't this be enough for the significance demanded in A7? I would suggest to revert the deletion.

2342: 5300: 5167:

Thanks for your continued reviews! I'm working my way through the Canada East constituencies. Question: how does New Page Reviewing work? I might be interested in volunteering for it, but have no idea what's involved?

980:. There needs to be a citation for "Sometimes the incorporation is used for humorous or ironic effect", and that each of the examples you gave is meant for humorous or ironic effect—otherwise it's original research. 745:

Hi, I'm reviewing this DYK nomination. Should the number here be a comma, or is that a range? "At 14:00, 1,000 Jews who already had work assignments were separated, and local employers began recruiting an additional

661:, when writing about fiction it's important not just to give a plot summary but also critical reception of the book. If you add a reception section summarizing the reviews and citing them, that would be great. See 1587:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1434:

2957: 2154: 2683: 2537: 2281: 4191: 4649:. Most mentions of "Collegium Carolinum" that I come across are in a historical context, and tend to be about Braunschweig or Kassel, but that is clearly related to the topics I am interested in... — 1374:

Really? You gave no indication that had happened on the review page. It's usual to close a review with an explanation of why it failed. You might have given me a chance to respond to the problems.

1281: 441:, it would have been rejected as needing more sources. Please, just reference all information when you are adding content to Knowledge (XXG) and you will not have any hassles from New Page Patrol. 4850:. Have you looked for news coverage or official announcements about changes in leadership? The two sources listed in external links may or may not be accurate, but they do not meet the standard for 4244:

Wrestling and watch her, Major Gunns ' porn movies she Major Gunns says she has coming out soon. She said that the other day on Twitter and to several independent circuit pro Wrestling promotions.

835:, if you have an in-progress article it's often best to start in draft space. Onco the article is in mainspace it shows up in our queue and we don't know if you're about to fix the problem or not. 1901: 3001: 149: 4902: 1427: 4077: 800:

given that it is a GA nom and an uncommon word isn't mentioned elsewhere in the article. In any case fantastic work on an important story that needs to be told. Good luck with the GA. --

5055:

I see you've rviewed several of the articles I've done on Province of Canada electoral districts. Thanks! That kind of quality control is essential for the health of Knowledge (XXG)!

1984: 1975: 4988: 639:

Are there any guidelines for what sources would be necessary in order to make this draft suitable for review? I tried to model it after the page for the previous book in the series,

5084:

Minor comment: the text in question in this article (the description of the boundaries) is from Statutes of Lower Canada, 1829, not the 1845 consolidated statutes. I can fix that?

4616:

Hi, I improved the article. Can You please review and speed up the process? Knowledge (XXG) needs article on men such as Jugin more than articles on Selena Gomez or Superbowl ... --

4123:

Hi. I noticed that you moved Athour Komodo into a draft. It's the best that you deleted that draft because a futsal team with that name is not exist. The user created the article,

1809: 4943: 909:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between October and December 2019.

4489:

Sure, let me know. In future it's best to start your article as a draft if you don't have the sources ready. As soon as it's published in mainspace it gets put in our queue.

276: 267: 1609: 1580: 5070:

Should I be adding the tag about text in public domain to all of them? I'm working my way through the list in alphabetical order and can certainly do that, if advisable?

2676: 4306:

Hello you have nominated some of the pages I have created for deletion, they are a work in progress as I have not finished them yet and are currently working on them.

5222:

You have a good amount of experience so I'd encourage you to apply directly at WP:PERM and learn as you go, as long as you're reasonably careful it won't be an issue.

1499: 4914:

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the

900: 3554: 1060:

OR" was very restrained I would like to have written something closer to "Pure PS" maybe one letter different. Thanks for clearing that up for me and your help.

4602: 3845:. Something strange must have happened as we were editing the same article at the same time. The article split into two articles, with the history also split. 3743: 3973: 2899: 1569: 1416: 3814:

Correct :) Because you have participated at FAR recently, I thought you might want to participate more. This template is to help get old FAs nominated.

1188: 5319: