User talk:Chealer - Knowledge

4411:, you cannot both retain administrative privileges and refuse accountability. I do not know you, but I know everyone makes mistakes, so your decision in itself does not mean you should not keep serving via administrative duties. However, if you think this case is exceptional, you need to demonstrate accountability. If you refuse to correct yourself and apologize or to provide a proper justification, your behavior may be reported if someone comes to the conclusion that you imposed a 72-hour global block simply because you were under the impression that one edit was inappropriate. -- 5897:

consequences for you. I think you have the wrong approach toward this. You want to find a philosophical answer to this problem. I think you should look at the problem more on the empirical side. It is an empirical fact that you are indeffed. It is also an empirical fact that multiple admins and an even larger number of editors have found your conduct problematic. Unless you recognise these empirical facts and empirically accept that you have caused widespread disruption, empirical reality will remain stuck at its present state, i.e. you being indefinitely blocked.

877:

do not like and prefer "adopted a relativistic position." I would argue the latter is confusing while the former is much clearer. To say it was a relativist position means he adopted the position of a relativist, which he was. To say it was relativistic is less clear because it kind of implies his position was relativistic and so possibly variable and inconstant. It wasn't either of those things; he seems always to have been a relativist. Does this clarify why your comment was confusing to me? Anyway, I hope this tangled matter is now closed! thanks for your help.

4136:

to appeal this block as many times as you want; if you've truly done nothing wrong any admin can review and overturn the block, although it's already been reviewed once and they didn't seem to agree with you. In fact, the reason you got blocked was "clear" to them. I wonder why that is? Also I'm not sure who you're threatening to "report" me to, but I am open to recall (see my user page) so there is a process you can go about to revoke my administrator privileges, if you so desire. I'm fairly certain however that the community will not back you on such an effort.

4465:? I am happy to learn you think other edits were faulty, but you still need to specify which. I already appealed the block, and further appeals would unlikely be productive. This issue is no longer about my inability to contribute, but is now about your behavior. Rest assured I will report you should you fail in correcting the result or in providing a proper block explanation. Administrative accountability does not mean your actions can be reverted - it means your privileges can be revoked if you misuse them. -- 2621:'s revert). And sorry for failing to sign the template I put on your talk page - thanks for making me notice. I'm also sorry for how the discussion on custom memory management evolved. Thanks for bringing it to the article's Talk page. Perhaps I should have started it there or moved it there before you did. Following the recent disagreements, perhaps thanks to you, I'm now aware of Reply to's power. I'm pleased to see this; it may avoid this issue in the future and make the next discussion less painful. -- 3843: 3025: 22: 2606:. I was sick, short on time, also frustrated, and - during the AN case - even short on sleep, and sometimes did not act as I should have. To be honest, my skin is pretty thick and harsh language doesn't affect me much personally, although it may affect my behavior as when it gets to personal attacks, I do tend to replicate at some point, even if I try not to react directly. I had more issues when some people denied their actions. 6074: 3810: 2952: 2433: 4118:

problematic edits again. You will be reported if you keep making unsubstantiated attacks. I did not state that my actual arguments were not contested by several people because I thought that was an edit warring exemption. I highlighted that because your block explanation alleged the contrary. I did not say that I feel I have the better argument, that I "feel right and they're wrong", and I know how we operate.

6262: 5177: 4885: 3916: 2855: 4296:

asking you for links to each edit which you think constitutes edit warring, but for links to a sufficient number of edits to give your opinion credibility. You need to understand that a revert does not necessarily (and generally does not) constitute edit warring; I am able to identify my own reverts, but that does not mean I can identify the edits which you have interpreted as edit-warring.

4268:. Disruptive editing is not a specific action, but a pattern of behavior that disrupts the productive functioning of the project. Edit warring is one example of disruptive editing, but any behavior that causes disruption falls under this category. Your apparent battlefield mentality and unending refusal to acknowledge negative behavior are other clear examples your disruptive behavior. 4195:

under your unblock request. All the information is there, literally spelled out! I don't know why it's not registering! There has been no failure to explain this block to you—I don't think I can break it down any more clearly. The only explanations I can think of is that either you don't understand the policies well enough to know how you could've violated them, or you're simply

3138:, even though I rectified him multiple times, so if he remains merely confused on some things, mere confusion no longer suffices to explain his behavior. I now simply prove him wrong with the shortest route. That may indeed not be really productive, but it's certainly more productive than spending more time arguing with someone who willfully ignores what he's been told :-( 1852: 3425: 1496: 2295: 2222: 3512:

some areas. I've started reviewing the new edits and have seen another problematic editor come back from a block with a number of new over-negative edits. The article is likely in a similar state to where it was a few months ago - biased on both sides. So I also did not revert just because the reversion was performed by a problematic editor.

3219:. After Lawrence claimed I had disagreed with part of WP:Lede, I asked him where. He then changed the subject and I pointed out he hadn't answered the question. He tried to change the subject 4 more times. So far, he did not reply to my fifth reminder of his failure to answer, which might be considered a passive admission that he was lying. 2258:... gee, the edit you point out is more than 2 years old. Not sure what I intended in the edit I did there, but I would not do that today, i.e. would not de-template the thing as it appears I did. Do you want me to dig in there and do some work to fix it up, or is it ok to just say "go forth and change it as you desire"? --User:Ceyockey ( 2571: 4168:, so I may very well be "declining to educate self on our policies" indeed, if you put it that way. If you think my behavior does not reflect that I understand how we operate here, explain how. I have already given you enough opportunity to correct yourself and have zero intention to appeal again. I certainly cannot help you understand 3568:"The response" is not a great surprise - it happened before. Many Wikipedians who are in conflict of interest with readers can remove the template. It is hard for anyone to ignore their interest in the interest of the public. And that is even harder when you do not even realize our own bias, which tends to affect young people even more. 3327: 4487:

absurd claims about some nonexistent misconduct on my part and continually threatening me if I don't do what you want. I have no idea what you're on about but it seems like you're either trolling or arguing for the sake of argument. Neither behaviors will get you very far after your block expires, but regardless, bye.

4172:'s decline reason, which does not include even one sentence. But I can reiterate that the question you should be asking yourself is why you thought a block would have been necessary. Rest assured I am aware that you can be recalled. I am not asking how to get you recalled, but why you resorted to a block. -- 4426:

explained over and over again. So no, sorry we're at an impasse, but I don't see any reason my actions need to be "corrected" by me. But again, you're right, everyone makes mistakes, which is why block review exists. I've explained this so many times, if you disagree with my given reasoning for the block,

4001:

Contrary to the block explanation, my edits have not raised multiple good faith objections from several editors, I have not "continued" to edit war on the page and my actual arguments were not contested by several people. The block explanation has also failed to pinpoint even one problematic edit. By

3586:

Semi-protection is there to stop vandalism from the more anonymoussie editors among us. Of course, what constitutes vandalism is sometimes questionable, but the longtime custodians of the Knowledge article are usually pretty good at spotting true vandalism. Having to deal with it day in and day out

3520:

changed the article a lot. I am very knowledgeable about Knowledge and think of myself as neither overly favorable nor overly dis-favorable, but that cannot be exact. If an encyclopedia project I contribute to has such a template, it would be hypocritical for me to keep contributing to its article on

2683:

I see. You would be correct to call me an immediatist, but I oppose such notes, in particular outside of stubs. I have flagged the links explaining their role. It would be helpful if editors could have personal notes/to-do lists about each article. Failing that, one can at least use the todo template

2667:

I am grateful for tagging when it is useful. You did catch some genuine errors in my citations. I am having a devil of a time tracking down where I read about the programmer in Delaware, but I'll find it eventually. Ditto for the bug bounty program and cryptographic module validation program: I wrote

1988:

on alerting a healthy English link to a link that points to a French web page. This is an act that bears the very mark of vandalism. Persistence turns the person from one who deserves an apology into a vandal. So, next time, if you feel I have mistakenly labeled something as vandalism, please come to

1610:

OK, so presumably you consider that since the main page is more often accessed by newcomers, and since the pages it links to will consequently be more often accessed by newcomers, Free content is more often accessed by newcomers and finally more often edited by newcomers. If that's the only rationale

1311:

These reversions are explained based on an assumption of bad faith in the reverted changes, rather than justified for their own merit. If the problem is an assumption of bad faith, I do not think any amount of comments will address that, unless RfCs include requests for comments on intentions... This

637:

There is a 'war' between distrowatch anda very few numbers of other info pages, which don't want to report about SYS. In revange, in SYS in /etc/host are blocked these web pages, and the user is conducted to SYS-friendly concurrence of them. Also, for users in France, the installation stops, because

603:

To 2: The most important mirrors are given in he wikipage itself. One can see directly, that this are mirrors kept at university institutes, which keep a certain standard and (at least some of them) check out the distros stocked there. This is an opposite to distros which are stocked only on 1 or 2

4486:

This is getting ridiculous. You've ignored every explanation I've given while continuing to argue some bizarre point about me needing to provide a link to every revert you made, lest I be "reported", you appear to be contesting the block but are refusing to get it reviewed, you're incessantly making

4295:

Now that you have shown this edit, I do see it. There is no doubt this edit is called a revert. I cannot say I agree that I "kept making reverts, even when other people disagreed". The existence of an edit warring report against someone does not cause their edits to constitute edit warring. I am not

4135:

Rest assured, if I modify your block at all it will be to extend it, as you somehow seem to have no idea why you got blocked and are apparently declining to educate yourself on our policies; you claim to understand how we operate here but your behavior does not reflect this. However you are welcome

3065:

That being said, I think the Barnstar of Diligence captures very well the spirit of my work here. Having already acquired the Editor's Barnstar and the Technology Barnstar, I don't think any other distinction could have been more appreciated. I usually dislike presents, but those who do not cost are

2884:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

2609:

Don't be too sorry about what you did neither. We all do lots of mistakes, in particular when we're new. And even if the mistake one does is small, it can trigger a dispute which can easily and quickly blow out of proportions when we let them get personal. I have been involved in countless disputes

2577:

Now that the AN/I business is all over, I wanted to apologize for the harshness of my language toward you. I was stressed and frustrated at the time and took it out unreasonably on you. There were better ways I could have responded to your edits. Here's a kitten to make up for it, and I wish you the

2348:

and for seeking to resolve this issue. For my part, I am short on time and would rather consider this as a misunderstanding than as a dispute, so I'd prefer to invest my time in continuing discussion than on trying to establish whoever was right or wrong, unless we're truly unable to resolve this in

2273:

Hi, I don't think you "de-templated" the thing. There were 2 references. The one which was second had its name changed and the first one was moved at the end. The problem is with the reference which was first. It seems you merely moved that one, but I do not understand why. Was it a pure mistake, or

1825:

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, your note definitely elucidates the sentence, thank you. However, I found it didn't prevent the original "uh?" moment, so I looked for a way to improve the text. The explanation is non-trivial, so I looked for a similar article expressing the same thing satisfyingly and found

1250:

My mistake, you're the reporter in the 3RR case and Machine Elf is the one reported. I'm still concerned about the behavior of both parties. An edit war that starts in one place and then spreads out to essay or guideline pages (that bear on the dispute) is an event that we have seen before, and it's

887:

Hum. First, I have nothing against the adjective "relativist" if it exists. I just saw that it is not recorded in Wiktionary and only appeared once in the article, so I thought its usage may have been an error. Disclaimer: I am not a native English speaker. If both exists, I would tend to think that

250:

Hi Chealer. I see you marked C2Net as not notable in May 2008. C2Net played an early history in the first SSL-enabled webservers. SSLeay became OpenSSL. So I think the company is notable from a historical perspective. You deleted some links that established notability as well. Can you clarify? Note:

6052:

Since you are unable to understand what I am telling you this is my last post on your page. I advise you re-read my post about empirical reality and if/when you understand it you can try to heed its message if you wish to get unblocked. If you don't you can always remain at your present state. Best

5342:

The problem with addressing the reasons for Jzg's block is that - as previously explained - they have not been revealed, assuming they exist. No matter how many editors would have supported the block, it still violates policy as long as no explanation was provided. Which edits are you referring to?

5292:

and address concerns that were raised there. The block was supported by multiple editors there. Please address the reasons for your block in any future appeal attempts. You need to convince us that you understand why your edits were disruptive and ensure us that such edits will not occur again.

4346:

In case 1, even though my revert was not justified just because it reverted edit-warring, it allowed to confirm that the editor was edit warring, in which case I could then have confidently reported him. In case 3, my revert would have been suboptimal, since I could simply have contacted the editor

4194:

I honestly don't know why you're acting as if you haven't received any explanation. Apart from the relatively straightforward explanations given in the block notice here, in your block log, and in your block review, I wrote a paragraph in your AN3 report, and then I wrote another paragraph directly

3616:

I understand what restrictions achieve. I requested the latest increase of restriction myself after having to deal with endless vandalism. I wasn't saying the article should be open. I was just saying that restriction exacerbates the bias in the article, making the template even more necessary, but

3511:

at this point. The article's bias was discussed on the talk page again a few months ago. I did lots of work largely aimed at addressing that, but did not finish, and several months have passed since then. Before I got involved, the article was generally over-positive, but also very over-negative in

1144:

Hi LittleJerry, I never heard about spotchecking, so I was going to say no, but after looking up what spotchecking is, I guess I did that quite a bit. However, I never made the effort of verifying content attributed to a source which is not accessible online. I am curious to know why you're asking.

1063:

Hi DeadlyAssassin. It is good in one way to have 2 articles, but this also causes a fair amount of duplication. The topics are extremely tied. The man clearly wouldn't have an article without the incident. Anyway, I'm not sure what's best. I do note that the internal and external links on Stanislav

876:

The confusion arises from the term relativist which means the same as relativistic. The noun and adjective mean the same thing and are used interchangeably over here. Berlin was a relativist and so his position is that of a relativist. Therefore the phrase "adopted a relativist position," which you

849:

OK thanks, I'm sorry I did expect a reply on my talkpage but wiki is confusing about this cuz some folks always post and reply on both and others just leave it to pot luck. I wasn't over-concerned about a *quick reply* per se, but was just initially baffled by what you actually wanted cuz I thought

782:

Last week you placed on my talkpage an ambiguously worded request concerning the terms relativist and relativistic. I duly replied to that request *on my talkpage* and as you did not reply at all I deleted it all later. Please do not ask people things on their talkpage and then just not be bothered

2044:

Hi. Well, I'm glad we worked it out. You see, only now I understand the original intent of your edit. You meant to change the link from Visio Viewer 2010 to Viso Viewer 2013. There was no way of knowing this before because I don't know French. So, sorry, I had no way of knowing what was deliberate

1564:

Hi Smsarmad. I saw the source, but it's unfortunately not about Arfa Karim. Her brand ambassador title is mentionned, but the article doesn't specify which achievement is referred to. The parenthesis recently added to our article implies that becoming Microsoft Certified professional at the age of

797:

I was not "just not bothered" to go back to your page, I just hadn't done it so far. I do have tons of things to do, and even if I had known as soon as you replied, I cannot guarantee to reply in 24 hours. I did not even receive anything when you replied. Last time I checked there was no way to do

706:

Oh, that's just an assumption of the experiment, that they will assign the half-coins to each other with 50% probability. Actually, that's not important. Any non-zero (or non-one) probability will do. The point of the half-coin story is the correlation: Alice has heads, Bob has tails. I've rewrote

5135:

The field you filled is called "Decline reason", not "Bunch of possible decline reasons, one of which is supposed to apply in this case". If you have a reason for declining this request, please mention that reason and that reason only. If not, please remove your review and leave the request for a

3571:

The article has been semi-protected for months, meaning its authors are even more biased in favour of Knowledge than those of our average article. Logically, this would be even more reason for warning readers, but socially, that means the people who determine whether the template is displayed are

3133:

and originally considered him confused but in good faith, so I did point out both that what he called policies were not policies, and that the essays or guidelines he invoked would not have excused his actions even if they had actually been policies. However, with his latest 3RR violation and its

2931:

Peristent vandalism by User:Chealer along with edit warring has returned by that User following full protection expiration. Requesting protection against persistent vandalism by User:Chealer. Three other editors have tried to address the tag bombing and deletions. The list of further deletions of

742:

Yes, that was a typo. The point of the envelope is to emphasize that the state of the half-coin is unknown, i.e., can be described only by a probability, until Alice opens it and check what is inside. This simulates the particles: they do not have a definite spin in the up-down direction, and can

633:

Also should be observed, that SYS is not one of these minimum distros; in opposite it's a big distro with many thousands of own packages (and probeably one of the fastest to compile and provide new linux kernel .tgz packages -- whilst a big part of other distros nor provide own kernel packages at

5364:

Same disruptive line of questioning as in the past, indicating no sign of understanding of the magnitude of the disruption this editor has caused. I suggest withdrawing talkpage access if these unblock requests continue without acknowledgement of the disruption which has caused this editor to be

3273:

I'm sorry my edit removed the result of your work. I understand that you had put important efforts into the removed part and it must be hard to see it go to waste. Unfortunately, we don't have appropriate data to support an analysis of importance at this point, even though the table on which you

3159:

Thanks for your reply, I can understand your frustration. Given the circumstances, might be wise to more fully explain your edit rationales and be less hasty to revert. On the surface your conduct appears to have been somewhat disruptive, which based on your response above is not your intention.

1917:

Thanks for the references. One of the references added supports the HD 8000 series case. However, I don't see any of them stating that HD 7000 series cards are Southern Islands, so the original problem remains. Please quote or refer to them in the relevant cell so it's clearer which reference is

600:

theinformation that SYS will not dependon short-term profit orprofit-deception. Also this is more detailed explained in the quoted sources. And can be verified imediately, clicking the link to themirrors, where everything is gratis downloadable and notpresent any comercial or limited version.

595:

To 1: It's one of the most important characteristics and origin of the SYS distro, for make it most easy for beginners, that the installation is full AUTOMATICALLY. This is short explained, with a few words (and this proportionally / reasonably short) in the wiki page, and more detailed in the

3535:

I can see both sides of this, and hopefully you can see by the response that the only way for COI to be taken seriously is to focus the allegation to a specific editor(s) who is too close to the article's subject to be objective. Even then it is often a hike, an upward climb, and yet worth the

1067:

Anyway, I looked at the articles. These are much better than what they used to be. There are still several problems with references and facts, but I flagged all those I saw. It's amazing that our sources about this topic are still so few and low-quality. I hope the articles continue to improve.

783:

to go back there and see what they said by way of reply. Doing so seems rather rude and cavalier. If you check my talkpage history you will see that I did not know initially what your point was but replied anyway. However, I later realised what you were driving at and changed the wording on the

5896:

Unfortunately you got that wrong too. This is not 3 attempts. This is a very long saga, spanning months, of 3RR reports, ANI reports, at least one AN report that I know of, multiple blocks etc., while during all this mess you profess absolute ignorance of the causes of this wiki-mayhem and its

2813:

Hi Chealer; Yes, that's correct. The author of that book has such a long history at Knowledge that I thought you might know more about the history of the book and why "Criticism" was preferable as a place for his comments about limitations to total policy size. It was unexpected to me to see a

634:

all, but take them from others like Debian, RedHat etc). Also, SYS brings already appr. 18 GB programs (lzma-highly-compacted) on the install DVD what installs this huge system between 10 to 40 min. Therefore, I think the wiki page is reasonable short about all relevantaspects of the distro.

4425:

I feel the block was justified for the reasons I've provided here and at AN3. All of these messages constitute what I feel is a very sufficient explanation and justification. Period. The fact that you think this block is over "one edit" I felt was inappropriate is simply not the case, as I've

5655:

Don't try to isolate this to me. I was not the one who blocked you for disruption but I agree with all the admins who did it. So do many other editors. It seems everyone has the same mind regarding your disruption and can clearly see it, except you. You either get it or you don't. It seems,

1389:

Hi Ed, I unfortunately could not revert to my preferred version of Close paraphrasing, due to lack of consensus. As the edit summary mentions, the new version is suboptimal. It was only adopted to keep consensus (see the discussion on the Talk page for more information). That edit was not a

613:

To my opinion, can be improved the english of the article, but I think the contens is already so short that almost nothing can be make shorter without to miss any 'minimum contens' rule of wiki for linux distros. It should be observed that similar informations give also the other distros.

4117:

What makes you claim I cannot admit to doing absolutely no wrong whatsoever? Again, if you think I was "edit warring over the OR tags while the AN3 report was open", you need to indicate the problematic edits. And if you think I was edit warring against multiple users, you need to indicate

517:

Hi there, thanks for the comment, I appreciate it. I should indeed consolidate my edits into fewer but sizeable ones, but I've been a bit lazy regarding them, especially when edits are necessary between subsections! Nevertheless, I'll try to make the edits more meaningful. Thanks again. :)

587:

An important source is the program's project page at Softpedia and at Linuxquestions.org . There are given extended informations. They were readed by thousands of persons, and also made thousands of downloads (see p.ex. the download counter at softpedia), and when there would be wrong

556:

The SYS distro exists already some years, without big changes (besides of updates). All Linuxdistros have their short wiki page. Like on them, on the page for SYS was tried to explain within an article of 1-2 print pages, the most important characteristics of the distro - specially what

3742:

There is no need to cluter up the talk page by starting a new section on every single edit about the same topic. Talk pages are arranged by topic. I will not respond in any new section but I will gladly discuss the topic with you or any editor in the existing discussion on that topic.

3515:

I do not really want to point specific editors. I noticed an administrator pushing an over-positive tone a couple of weeks ago, although he eventually reverted himself. I am sure we would find countless other heavily biased Wikipedians who edited the article if we tried. And if not, then

815:

Ah, I just noticed this at the end of the notification mail i received when you created this Relativism section: "This email notification feature was enabled on English Knowledge in May 2011". So yeah, that's a welcome new feature and I'll be sure to try the "workflow" I described above.

599:

To 3: There are some comercial and many no-comercial distros, so that in the wiki page, according to the wiki guides how to obtain it, it's given the information that it's gratis (and downloadable from the mirrors). Also - what's important for the reliability over long time - is given

4841:

Seriously, feel free to expand on "something", but I will not ride a bike any more today unless the advice comes from a health professional. Revoke that block and go edit, or do something else which is productive, but if you leave this block without explanation, you will be reported.

2639:

I'm glad we were able to resolve the problem this way. It was a learning experience for me and made me realize that I enjoy editing much more when it is friendly and collaborative rather than adversarial. Thanks for the kind words. Here's to better interactions in the future! –

2305:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is

1781:

I'm sorry about that. I tried to clarify. Let me know if I failed. I also did a second try to make it clear when the PC leadership race was. Sorry if you still see an issue. I know that 2011 is mentioned soon after, but it wasn't clear that the promise was also done in 2011.

3128:

I assume your nudge mainly comes from some replies I made to LawrencePrincipe about WP:BRD and WP:Lede. I understand your intervention, but I did not ignore guidelines and essays just because they are not policies. I did not know LawrencePrincipe before getting involved in

3360:

Please note that "allusion" is "an expression designed to call something to mind without mentioning it explicitly". In the case at hand, the Fictional Person George P. Burdell was mentioned explicitly. Therefore, your use of the word allusion is in my opinion incorrect.

1893:. It would help if you could indicate which change you consider problematic. This could be done by linking to the "Difference between versions" page. You may also notify me of your comment to make sure it is not missed (the Talkback template allows doing this). Thanks -- 888:"relativistic" would be less ambiguous as it cannot be a noun, only an adjective. Now, I somewhat understand the ambiguity you saw, but I fail to see why the same ambiguity wouldn't exist with "relativist" (considering it would mean the same as "relativistic"). Thanks -- 746:

What I am trying to do is to give a concrete mechanism through which Alice will get a random bit which is anti-correlated with Bob's. A server who generates random bits and sends them to Alice, while sending the negation of these bits to Bob would have the same effect.

456:. (It goes back to a thesis "The Iran-Iraq war: the politics of aggression" By Farhang Rajaee from the university of Tehran that reads like a political tract. It's scholarship that isn't peer reviewed from a well-regarded academic press and has no scholarly citations. 1411:

by Moonriddengirl suggests that you did not succeed in 'keeping consensus' with your change. I actually could not find anyone on the talk page who agrees with you. If you will consider creating an RFC, that is one way to clarify what does or does not have consensus.

3250:

articles, you deleted (without any discussion and consensus) a lot of content that was relevant, important and backed by valid references. Please stop all these blatant deletion edits, as by them, you are undoing other editors' work that may have taken up a lot of

4353:

was such an edit, the chances of possibility 4 were significant. Unless this analysis is mistaken, I consider my action as entirely appropriate. Unless you propose a superior approach, I even believe I would take the same decision if I faced this case again.

596:

sources just explained. How I could explain this important and unique characteristics of the distro more short ???? Also, interested people can simply try it out, download the install .iso from the quoted mirrors and install it from a DVD or USB key.

4323:

Thank you for providing at least one concrete accusation. However, you should also explain why you consider that edit constitutes edit-warring, and suggest at least one superior alternative to the course of action I chose. The edit you mentioned reverted

4518:

I warned you early that you would be reported if you kept making personal attacks. Since you just claimed that I am "continually threatening me if I don't do what you want" failing to providing any supporting evidence, you will be reported for violating

3330:. Your comments are helpful, I just wanted you to check the changes and the GA. Also, I am not getting much time to spend on WP and am getting delayed in followup. I read the comments and will make an attempt to work on them later today. Thank you! -- 272:

not notable. The article doesn't give a clear picture of what was the status of SSL-enabled webservers at the time Stronghold was released. I may be "wrong" and C2Net may be notable. Regarding the links, I'm not sure which ones you're thinking about.

4401:

I can certainly not accept the block, but if you refuse to correct the result yourself, it would be best to have an explanation of your action before asking others to revise it. You need not to explain this several times, but you do need to explain

5139:

Please note that while all interventions can be valuable if they are well-intended, you should answer for your own mistakes before trying to fix issues caused by others. You need only look at this very page to find an unexplained policy violation.

1322:

To summarize, the assumption of bad faith mixed with the feeling of ownership prevents change. Resolving any of these issues without civility doesn't look promising. Considering that the contributor is aware of the 3RR, has already been pointed to

4120:

Also, you should stick to topic in your block explanations. I know how to game the system and rest assured I would have been able to had I wanted. You should save your fingers and use them to substantiate your claims and verify your allegations.

134:

article a request for clarification. I read the sentence up to where you placed the tag and was unable to determine what needed clarifying. Could you visit the article's talk page and explain what is confusing or unclear for you? Thank you.

4404:

As you will know if you edited Knowledge, justifying your actions often takes much longer than performing these. Unfortunately, such discussion is generally necessary to convince diverging contributors, or to realize the problems with your own

1042:

in the past. Following a discussion about splitting biographical data about the man involved from the article of the incident, I have been bold and made a cut at the changes required however I wanted to invite you to have a look at my edits on

1907:

the template didn't say what I wanted, i guess. the manual of style says that tables have their refs at the bottom. there are refs stating that the HD 7000 series is southern islands. please stop removing sourced information from the page. --

1304:

rv obvious Why would an WP:RS inject M&M? / irrelevant: Followers of naturalism (naturalists) assert that natural laws are the rules that govern the structure and behavior of the natural universe, that the universe is a product of these

4260:. See how you kept making reverts, even when other people disagreed? Even when there was an edit warring report against you pending? That's one of the reasons you were blocked. If you don't understand this, again, I will direct you to 4088:. It doesn't matter if you've explained yourself, if you feel you have the better argument, if you feel you're right and they're wrong, we operate based on consensus, if you edit war and cause disruption, you're going to get blocked. 1702:

Hi P64, thanks for contacting me. I would like to contribute, but I am not a native English speaker, all I can do is to notice that the article is currently contradictory and mis-structured. I tagged the article as requiring cleanup.

5437:

What I think is you should ask what reason Jzg supposedly had to him, not to me. As you could have guessed, had I known what reason he presumably had, I would probably not have warned him that his failure to explain would lead to a

172:

article. You put two tags on the phrase "PS2 Linux" however, there are many references to that phrase. The entire article addresses "PS2 Linux" and "Linux for PlayStation2." So again, I am unsure what is confusing or unclear.

860:

Thanks. I completely agree that Knowledge needs to do better for discussions. I did not and still do not realize that my request was ambiguous, but I'm sorry if that's the case. Your edit absolutely solves the original problem.

722:

Thank you but I don't feel significantly closer to understanding the example. I don't see how putting the half-coin in an envelope then getting it out changes anything. It says "Alice then measures her half-coin, by opening her

5475:

But this is exactly why you were indeffed. Your inability or refusal to understand or accept your disruption is precisely the reason for your indefinite block. No amount of circular reasoning on your part will lift this block.

2015:

Vandalism can be persistent, just like anti-vandalism can be persistent. Persistence does not imply vandalism, deliberateness does. Linking to a French web page on the English Knowledge was of course not deliberate. Please see

2610:

since I got involved in Knowledge and LSSP in general. Yet, I have rarely received apologies, and I don't remember receiving an apology like yours. I certainly didn't receive one with a cute kitten before, that's appreciated.

3134:

aftermath, it has become clear that LawrencePrincipe is in bad faith, so lately, I have chosen to spend less time trying to teach him. He has now portrayed non-policies as policies at least 10 times just in edits related to

1366:. You have continued to revert to your preferred version of Close paraphrasing, apparently in the effort to show that Machine Elf was wrong in that a dispute that started at two philosophy articles. One of your reverts was 352:

I'm looking for an actual citation that says that MIPS and/or ARM are supported by Gentoo Linux. The current links show that there was work for getting Gentoo on MIPS on ARM, but they don't tell the status of the projects.

5964:

I am not sure what problem you are referring to, but I am sure the last time I created an ANI report, AN report or block was years before you even edited this page for the first time. What disruption are you referring to?

106:

I do think this deletion is uncontroversial. Of course, this doesn't mean that no one in the world would oppose the deletion. The article doesn't meet the general notability guideline...we'll see if it survives its AfD.

2468:

Hello Chealer. At first sight this doesn't look good for you. There might still be time for you to respond (if you are so inclined) before any admin action is taken. If you truly don't have enough time to contribute at

94:. As suich, it was a very poorly considered choice to propose it for deletion, and I urge you to be a little more careful and if possible try and research topics before proposing them for deletion in future. Sincerely, 4163:

If a block's victim fails to understand why they got blocked, that most likely signals a problem with the block explanation. In any case, it certainly does not mean you should extend it. I am the primary maintainer of

3764:

Although editors are expected to explain controversial modifications, you are free to refuse to answer. However, you should not hide messages from other editors, and I will not remove my question even if you refuse to

4264:, which explains the policy you violated in detail. I do not need to copy links for each edit here, as if you're not able to identify your own reverts, there's a larger issue at play. The other reason I cited was 3643:. I've gone up against the status quo on that page before, and I found that, while it always helps to have "bullets in your gun", an unerring aim is even more important and crucial to changing the status quo. 5052:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

2059:

There were 2 reasons for my first edit: updating the link and indicating that it was not to learn on Visio but simply to download it. The main reason was indicated in the edit summary ("update link to Visio

1981:, I thought it is done by 62.190.38.62. Otherwise, I know better than to ever use the word "vandalism" in conjunction with a Knowledge veteran who has been here since 2004 and have done over 8000 edits. 850:

the issue was more about the berlin quote and not the wording I had used...so let's leave it if that's OK and thanks for clarifying and I hope my tweek to the article solves the original problem. cheers

4347:

to ask for a justification instead. However, this case is unlikely, because even if the editor had erroneously failed to justify, he could still have provided his justification via a discussion page.

3089:

Hello. I appreciate your contributions to Knowledge -- I know how much effort goes into improving the encyclopedia. Based on some of your recent edits and exchanges with other editors concerning the

2766:

page by you without much added notation. It is a book-length study by an admin and I was wondering if you were supporting/opposing the limitations to total policy size approach in his book. Cheers.

6011:

I think we have a language problem here. I am not referring to the reports you made. I am referring to the ANI/AN/3RRN reports people have made about you recently. Are you aware of those reports?

940:

Thank you Matej. FWIW, you had not forgotten me, it's just that we discussed the matter via IRC, over 4 years ago :-) I looked at the file though, and it's amazing how many sequences there are! --

2205:

Excellent, thank you. Could you please specify the page where the citation comes from? The page is buggy and my browser's search is behaving abnormally, but it apparently can't find that text. --

2932:

cited material by that editor followed by the re-inserting of citation template requests to provide the deleted material, are far too numerous to attempt to provide all the diffs and urls for.

3185:

recently, and there's no doubt I could have spent more time explaining some. While I unfortunately cannot retroactively change my edit summaries, I can always elaborate on a change on request.

2495:

Thanks Ed. Rest assured I have already discussed the issue which triggered the DRN at length, though I only did that in the proper channels, as it turned out no dispute resolution was needed.

3255:. If you have some doubt regarding whether or not some significant amount of content should appear in an article, please first discuss it on the article's or relevant user's talk-page(s). -- 4725:

I have requested an unblock, but I still expect you to justify your claim of disruptive editing. Given your reckless attitude, I will report you should you fail to explain or apologize. --

3635:, are introduced on the talk page. If you feel that the template should be there, then maybe it should; however, if you apply it again, be sure to be prepared to thoroughly justify it at 3310:

Thank you for your work and for your nomination, which I take as a compliment. I am not sure what you expect from me, but I reviewed the latest changes and commented on the GA review. --

3101:

and to utilize the resources there to address any questions or suggestions you have. Ignoring guidelines and essays just because they are not "policies" is unproductive and disruptive. —

6344: 1163:

I need someone to spotcheck the giraffe article. It failed FA status due to some close paraphasing of the sources. I recently went back and re-pharphased the sources I have available.

691:

Hi, I asked to clarify why Alice's measurement would result in an unpredictable series of measurements that will tend to a 50% probability of her half-coin being "heads" or "tails". --

6009:

I am not sure what problem you are referring to, but I am sure the last time I created an ANI report, AN report or block was years before you even edited this page for the first time.

2997: 1331:, I do not think a warning is necessary or would help a lot. However, if you believe that will suffice, I would appreciate if you could monitor the situation's evolution. Thank you -- 4334:

The editor failed to realize that his reversion was controversial. In that case, my revert ensured he would see the discussion on the issue and start contributing to it if necessary.

4230:

If you really think you cannot "break it down any more clearly", how about quitting speculating and starting by simply listing the edits which you allege constitute edit-warring? --

3062:

I always feel strange when I receive such an honor. I do not remember interacting you before, so I must say I feel like I'm receiving an excessive reward for a trivial contribution.

604:

mirrors (like, f.ex: paldo, goblinx -which seems to have no working mirror anymore, and many other distros). There were even canceled some SYS mirrors which stopped to work good.

4084:

and see as clear as day that you were edit warring against multiple users. It doesn't even matter if you feel your "actual arguments were not contested by several people", that's

2274:

did you mean to move it somewhere else? I'd be glad if you could solve this. I simply noticed something wrong, it's not blocking me from anything (I'm done with this article). --

4864:

I'll be happy to overlook your block and your failure to correct it yourself if you explain promising this will not happen again by the time I reported you, but this may happen

5602:

If even you can't explain which disruption your own comment referred to, I'm afraid you'll remain the only person to understand it - if you do have such an exclusive talent. --

557:

distinguishes this distro from other distros in a positive sense, as required from the wiki politics and discused with or even suggested by earlier reviewers of the wiki page.

3822: 3814: 2445: 2437: 1363: 4581:

to accept sanctions for your misconduct. And I won't be pulled into one of your endless discussions on this issue, so the warning stands, and I'll have no further comment.--

2045:

because the one thing that I saw was the "fr-ca" in the link. I promise I'll be more careful in monitoring edits; in exchange, next time, please drop me note. Best regards,

3364:

Please fix your edit of my entry to reflect the facts. Perhaps you would like "Fictitious" rather than "Fictional" as more in line with previous usage in various articles.

618:

Information on mirrors is rare on Knowledge. It's granted that a project notable enough to be covered in an encyclopedia should have a reliable and fast mirrors network. --

1932:

I believe I have fixed this; please verify. 7xxx is spread across northern/southern/sea, unfortunately. The marketing-names do not correspond to the engineering-names.

638:

of the open-source-enemy french law (shall theyspend their money to M$ !!). This are also special characteristis mentioned only very abreviated in the SYS wiki page.

4515:

Where would I have "continu to argue some bizarre point about needing to provide a link to every revert made"? In fact, where would I have even started arguing that?

3689:

I think that just having myself as a top 5 contributor constitutes enough specifics to warrant the template. The Talk page already contains discussion of the issue. --

2956: 4302:. I admit I was not familiar with that guideline before you made me read it, but unless you explain how it concerns my behavior, I deny having disruptively edited. -- 4298:

As for your accusation of disruptive editing, neither "battlefield mentality" nor "refusal to acknowledge negative behavior" - whatever you mean by that - feature in

1312:

may not apply to the fourth reversion, whose edit summary I find unintelligible. All of these edits were done after the contributor was pointed to Knowledge:Civility.

2077:

Hmm? Well, actually, I though the link also gives info about Visio Viewer 2013 too. But I don't mind putting it back. In fact I am going to do it now. Best regards,

1259:

please use RfCs or find some other way to bring in outsiders. I am planning to close the 3RR case with warnings to both parties if the dispute has actually stopped.

830:

Oh, wait, that just works for your own user talk page. So I'm afraid you should keep not expecting a reply in 24 hours - at all (unless you reply on my own page). --

727:." Is "envelopes" supposed to be singular? My partial understanding wants Alive to have one envelope for her only half-coin, and Bob to have one envelope for his. -- 493:

I deprodded as it has quite a bit of news coverage. Fr Knowledge has a slightly longer stub, so I'm going to use that and the news coverage to expand the article.

4698:

Thank you, but I assume Bbb23 is a grown-up and can answer himself for his actions. That being said, if you believe what you wrote, please indicate why you do. --

4349:

Even though my choice might have been suboptimal in the first cases, eventuality 4 remains. While manipulation errors of this kind are rare, in the context where

4328:("Revert to revision 650947523 dated 2015-03-11 20:07:17 by GliderMaven using popups"). We will likely never know what happened, but there are 4 possibilities: 3125:

I must confess I'm far from knowing all policies and guidelines by heart, but I'm not exactly a newcomer here, so I'm not quite ignorant about them neither :-P

3066:

the best kind. This was possibly my best birthday present this year :-) And what better time to receive this than 3 days after my first Knowledge deciversary?

5327:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

5120:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

4064:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

4072:

You're kidding, right? This is exactly why you got blocked. You can admit to doing absolutely no wrong whatsoever. You were edit warring over the OR tags

5160:. I advise you to avoid using your administrative privileges any more until the review of your usage is complete (except for constructive purposes). -- 3587:

sometimes several times a day from IP editors just wasn't hacking it. And I agree that it is very hard to recognize one's own bias, and that goes for

650: 2512:

If your opinion is that 'no dispute resolution was needed' does that mean you will not make any controversial edits without getting consensus first?

1989:

my talk page. I do not shy from apologizing for my mistakes. In addition, if it is not vandalism, then it is an edit dispute and merits carrying out

676:

article, but was not specific enough for me to understand what you didn't understood. Could you please clarify what does need clarification? Cheers.

2307: 2302: 1048: 532:

P.S. By the way, can DistroWatch be cited? I'd like to move Trustix and EnGarde back to their respective subsections, but want to clarify it first.

2164:

Thank you. I'm aware that using such a reference is allowed. I'll take your message as a positive answer to my question. Note that you can use the

4858:

It has been a week since my reply. Since you have given no indication you would handle this yourself, I had to request someone else to intervene.

4675:

It's improper to edit any archived page aside from your own user talk page archives. This is especially true for Knowledge noticeboard archives.

4658:

do not know is why you claimed that editing the edit warring noticeboard archive again would be disruptive, and which misconduct you referred to.

2407:

Hi Guy! Sorry for the late reply. It appears we already managed to reach a consensual solution to this issue. Your offer is still appreciated. --

1236:. In any case, I have no intention of reverting anymore, I am hoping other people will intervene now that administrators were informed. Thanks -- 6078: 6027:

attempts to elucidate your references to alleged disruption from my part, while your answer referred to some actions which are not even from me.

4374:

Appeal the block or accept it but I won't be continuing this any more. I've explained this to you far more times than I should have needed to.

295:

This page was deleted after you PRODded it a while back, but has now been restored after a request at today's DRV. You can AFD it if you wish.

4252:"? Since you understand policy, you understand that that's called a "revert", correct? You're blocked for edit warring, which is when editors 536:

DistroWatch can be cited, though that doesn't mean DistroWatch is always a sufficient source. I don't consider its reliability to be great. --

3792:

Hi Chealer. This is to let you know that you are currently at 3 reverts on the page. This is a limit that should not be exceeded. Thank you.

2901: 4331:

The faulty editor intentionally performed a controversial reversion without justifying, in which case his rollback constitutes edit warring.

2742:, deletion is pretty much where I was trying to get that article, so I'm glad someone else beat me to it. Thanks for notifying me anyway. -- 6297: 5217: 4925: 3956: 1328: 1282: 6329: 5312: 5105: 5083: 4049: 3891: 2123: 1933: 1459: 2652: 2593: 2460: 82:. It's a safe bet that very few political articles will be uncontroversial deletions. Furthermore, not only does the article meet the 4430:. If you want to report me that's perfectly fine, go for it, but why you're threatening to hold me accountable when you're block has 2023:

Reversions are not necessarily due to edit disputes or vandalism. Simple errors (like typos) call for reversions (sometimes partial).

3098: 3069:

Whatever reasons you had, I am very touched by your gift. Thank you, and thank you for all your other contributions to Knowledge. --

2835:

I don't know much about the history of the book. The paragraph was already in a section titled "Criticism" before I got involved. --

1504: 71: 1660:

line needs a link at the end, so WikiCleaner shouldn't flag those as needless links to the same page. Thanks for letting me know. -

4526:

Please spare us your speculation on my reasons. It will be much more efficient for you to stick to explaining your own reasons. --

4434:

is beyond me. Get it reviewed again if you think that was wrong, but there's no need to act as if there's no accountability here.

4989: 3037:

The Barnstar of Diligence is awarded in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service.

2723:

Just to notify you that someone (not me, although obviously I support it) put up a PROD for that page. You might want to review.

1474: 608:

University mirrors are not always reliable. Feel free to restore these claims if you can accompany them with reliable references.

798:

so, but now perhaps putting a watch on the page and removing it when you get a reply would be a fairly efficient way to proceed?

6339: 6128:

Directly related to the questions I posed in the section above which you removed and related to your behavior in that section.

3215:

After looking at the history again, I realize you may have been misled by what LawrencePrincipe wrote in edit summaries and on

5156:

Please refrain from taking unjustifiable administrative actions. Failure to explain declines constitute further violations of

3507:

To clarify, I simply reverted a reversion of an edit which added the tag, performed by a heavily biased editor. I do not have

391:

None of the distributions listed was known for supporting m68k. The real reason is that nobody uses m68k anymore these days.--

2893: 2168: 1763: 475: 3274:

based your work seems to say we do. One way to avoid repeating this would be to avoid basing content on primary sources. --

2149:

contains the info you want. Sad state of affairs, I agree, but currently this is what we have to deal with. Happy editing,

6293: 6237:

Again, please stick to topic and avoid personal attacks. I was not asking you for several replies, just for one answer. --

5212: 4920: 3951: 2668:

notes, but couldn't find the source for them when I wrote the article. So they are there to remind me to find the source.

2026:

Anyway, thanks for spotting the error, and sorry about that. Regarding this specific error, it happened because I assumed

1815: 4299: 4265: 2909: 1863:

without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an

1537: 1371: 1359: 1352: 1294:

Undid revision 480878478 by Chealer (talk) lame excuse about space before ellipsis in order to alter the quotation marks

1289:

Undid revision 480883432 by Chealer (talk) attempt to justify user's abuse of close paraphrasing template at Meterialism

502: 1867:. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the 1364:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Machine Elf 1735 reported by User:Chealer (Result: Both warned)

459:

Thanks for letting me know though, the whole page needs work actually and I can't seem to find the time. ````V7-sport

3875: 2913: 39: 251:

I'm not the author of the article and have never been associated with C2Net, just remember them from the mid-1990's.

5189:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

4897:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

4861:

Announcing your intention of revoking your blocks should impossible events happen does not make them any less rude.

3928:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3260: 2964: 2937: 2921: 2819: 2771: 1210: 988: 5190: 4982: 4898: 3929: 3850: 2872: 2385:. While participation at DRN is optional, I would encourage you to give us a chance at resolving this dispute. -- 1565:

nine years is the achievement that made her earn her ambassador title, but no source is given to support that. --

5289: 1299:

the only purpose of these edits is to provide an excuse for the user's tendentious abuse of "close paraphrasing"

48: 5184: 4892: 3923: 2364: 1811: 2698:

That's what I usually do, but I thought that I would get back to this quickly. However, real life intervenes.

332:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Comparison_of_Linux_distributions&diff=279308061&oldid=278952237

3462:

Thank you for thanking me for thanking you... but it's a pleasure! As much fun as possible for you too ;-) --

2498:

I'm not sure which point you mean. The accusation is quite an amalgam, but I'll try to clarify a bit soon. --

6338:. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the 6269: 2703: 2673: 2127: 2082: 2050: 2002: 1937: 1684: 1677: 1645: 1278: 1256: 912:... you don't write number of an Unicode character, but a characters themselves. Take a look for example at 878: 851: 788: 523: 494: 300: 169: 131: 123: 3445:

It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! –

2030:

was causing the page's translation, while in fact Microsoft's website hardcoded the language in the URL. --

6203: 6145: 6098: 5023: 4815:

I've blocked you indefinitely, for reasons that should be obvious. I'm happy to unblock you when you have

4776: 4036: 3871: 3818: 2905: 2904:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

2877: 2866: 2792: 2650: 2591: 2458: 2441: 1864: 1370:

on 11 March, and you have edited the page seven times altogether since March 1. If you continue to revert

4628:

You reverted at the archive again after a clear warning not to do so. I've blocked you for one week. See

374:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Comparison_of_Linux_distributions&diff=prev&oldid=275844378

6309: 5231: 4939: 3970: 3256: 2960: 2933: 2917: 2830: 2815: 2784: 2767: 2446:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chealer reported by User:FenixFeather (Result: )

1508: 1233: 1168: 1134: 221:

Fixed it. Though you could have probably made the same edit and the issue would have been resolved. --

3631:

Well, others seem to feel that the COI template should only be used if specifics, without violation of

413: 381: 342: 3813:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

2436:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

1217:

to stop reverting and follow dispute resolution that may be a good way to avoid sanctions. Thank you,

3651: 3611: 3599: 3563: 3548: 3502: 3487: 3447: 3042: 3005: 2996:

Hi Chealer, after I blocked JA 1983 JA, I ran a checkuser, which indicated the account was a sock of

2986: 2517: 2486: 2233: 2196: 2154: 1478: 1417: 1379: 1264: 1222: 1022: 995: 969: 963: 673: 463: 4819:. Seriously, go and ride a bike or something and come back when your usual equilibrium is restored. 254: 4976: 4798: 4758: 4408: 3331: 3299: 2897: 2390: 2357: 2027: 1771: 1748: 1095: 1052: 588:

descriptions about the distro, then users would have left a comment / reclamation or bad votation.

258: 95: 4256:

instead of using discussion to resolve a dispute. Now, look at your edits in the page history for

409: 377: 338: 3823:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chealer reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: )

3751: 3728: 3163: 3104: 2699: 2669: 2334: 2261: 2255: 2078: 2046: 1998: 1630: 1598: 1324: 519: 471: 226: 178: 140: 54: 3356:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:List_of_hoaxes_on_Wikipedia&oldid=640621046

5288:

You have not addressed the reason for your block: disruptive editing. It's be good for you to

1232:

Hi Ed, I am not sure I understand who you address, but I am the reporter. The one reported is

560:

Thus, to my opinion, it shouldn't changed too much, and not removed important characteristics.

453:

I broke the reference because the reference doesn't meet Knowledge Reliable sources guidelines

6187: 6129: 6082: 5009: 4971: 4169: 4030: 3390: 3376: 3247: 3024: 2641: 2603: 2582: 2481:

is putting themselves in an awkward spot if admins are asked to review the matter. Thank you,

2449: 2146: 1868: 1653: 487: 5441:

I will not answer any further question from you until you have provided an answer to mine. --

1871:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 6289: 5321: 5114: 4746: 4058: 3881: 3632: 1872: 1164: 1130: 1044: 1039: 752: 712: 681: 658: 50: 21: 6186:

of asking inane questions. This is the last time I will reply to you. I cannot be clearer.

2360:. If you want to accelerate resolution, I'd encourage you to get/keep participating in the 2091:

Ah, it does too. Information I wish I had read before I downloaded. Thanks, that's good. --

5157: 5091: 4637: 4586: 4554: 4549:

again. You've been correctly reverted twice. If you do it again, you risk being blocked.--

4500: 4447: 4387: 4281: 4216: 4149: 4101: 3907: 3842: 3057: 3038: 3001: 2982: 2564: 2513: 2482: 2361: 2229: 2192: 2150: 1830:. I copied that to Quebec City and hope this clarifies. I still left your note for now. -- 1662: 1495: 1413: 1375: 1260: 1218: 1019: 992: 966: 930: 423: 2981:

That was very rude what you just did. I asked you a question and expected a good answer.

1285:

too now. Machine Elf 1735's edit summaries in his latest reverts to these articles were:

5028:

I asked him to rectify following his implantation of an indefinite block on this account

3000:, who seems to have an obsession with ceiling fans. Anyway, good call in reporting him. 1090:

Sorry, that part was not supposed to be changed on my edit. Just fixed it (with an IP).

334:. Why did you add the citation needed stuff? The links provided are clear enough, IMHO. 6352: 6334: 5298: 5022:

is either ignorant about blocks or thinks pseudo-humor and esoteric advice exempt from

4794: 4770: 4754: 4578: 4196: 4003: 3768:

That being said, if your problem is really the question's location, I authorize you to

3636: 3216: 3094: 2881: 2791:

I'm rather confused here. Are you not the author of that paragraph? I only added it to

2386: 2311: 1767: 1744: 1091: 64: 2120: 6328:

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the

4827: 4821: 4816: 4629: 4520: 3744: 3724: 3210: 3118: 2728: 2618: 2474: 2470: 2382: 2330: 2323: 1990: 1722: 1692: 1627: 1595: 1541: 1526: 1407:

A consensus is something which enjoys general support. The fact that your change was

1214: 467: 289: 222: 174: 136: 91: 83: 79: 5827:

After 3 attempts, I would be more affirmative: we certainly don't get… an answer. --

6238: 6169: 6115: 6035: 5966: 5828: 5708: 5603: 5512: 5442: 5385: 5344: 5267: 5263: 5195: 5161: 5141: 5031: 4903: 4869: 4843: 4780: 4726: 4699: 4662: 4603: 4564: 4527: 4466: 4412: 4355: 4303: 4261: 4231: 4173: 4122: 4115:

Rest assured I am not kidding. I will retire should you fail to correct the result.

4007: 3934: 3863: 3859: 3773: 3690: 3640: 3618: 3573: 3522: 3463: 3401: 3386: 3372: 3311: 3275: 3223: 3189: 3142: 3070: 2836: 2800: 2743: 2685: 2622: 2543: 2538:

What I meant is that dispute resolution was not and will not be needed - the issue

2499: 2408: 2368: 2275: 2206: 2175: 2092: 2064: 2031: 1947: 1919: 1894: 1831: 1783: 1704: 1612: 1586: 1566: 1431: 1394: 1332: 1237: 1186: 1146: 1110: 1069: 1005: 941: 889: 862: 831: 817: 802: 763: 728: 692: 619: 537: 427: 392: 354: 311: 274: 268:

Hi Sidfilter. First, I didn't mark C2Net as not notable, I only marked it as being

196: 151: 108: 2063:

I do not understand why you removed the indication the link serves to download. --

1984:

But there is something even worse than that: It is a veteran of English Knowledge

1374:

before getting a consensus on the talk page, you may be blocked for edit warring.

6077:

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

2892:

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

2889:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 1743:. Sometimes I really wonder what happened to Knol, or what Google was thinking.. 6208: 6150: 6103: 3723:

Thanks for thanking me, but what I added to Knowledge was immediately reverted.

1909: 1890: 1880: 1856: 1274: 1252: 979: 909: 748: 708: 677: 654: 454: 296: 3367: 2854: 6358: 6054: 6012: 5898: 5769: 5657: 5557: 5477: 5411: 5366: 5130: 5087: 4720: 4649: 4633: 4597: 4582: 4550: 4510: 4488: 4456: 4435: 4396: 4375: 4318: 4290: 4269: 4225: 4204: 4158: 4137: 4110: 4089: 3895: 3826: 3793: 3430:

Chealer, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...

3295: 2762:

Hi Chealer; Some material on the new book "Common Knowledge" was added on the

2353: 2345: 1589:

is continuously prominently linked from the Main Page. See also the header on

1533: 1458: 1430:

at any time. Regarding the RFC, Moonriddengirl just did that. Thanks anyway --

926: 784: 5556:

have to answer that question if you want to get unblocked. No use asking me.

3352:

You replaced my use of "Fictional Person" with "Allusion to a fictional...".

5337: 5294: 4750: 4257: 4165: 4081: 4080:!! It's not hard to see the problem here, anyone can look at the history of 3867: 3480: 3243: 3182: 3135: 3130: 3090: 2862: 2796: 2017: 1740: 1004:

Thanks, but unfortunately, learning to drive is still on my TODO list :-S --

6182:

The ones you removed and that I linked to in the AN post. You have a habit

4838:

Your "reasons" are certainly not obvious. I am underground wearing pajamas.

4199:. The explanation has been clearly given. If you don't think the block was 3874:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 3222:

I recommend to verify anrything he states about those he disagrees with. --

591:

The wiki page contains only a very compacted explanation of these details.

4203:, again, you're more than welcome to appeal it as many times as you want. 787:

article from relativist to relativistic. Hope this clarifies. many thanks

5057:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge,

4693: 4676: 4602:

How would it be disruptive? And which misconduct are you referring to? --

4337:

The faulty editor unintentionally failed to provide a valid edit summary.

2739: 2724: 1827: 1718: 1688: 1685:

Talk: Plurality (voting)#North American vs. British usage for "plurality"

1656:

folks to get the code updated. From what you said, it appears that every

743:

only be described by a probability of turning up or down when measured.

3424: 2959:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

1889:

Welcome Aunva6. If the reason for some change is unclear, please ask on

1851: 52: 6272:

has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

4749:

magazine article from October 2014 on the topic of Knowledge to our WP

2352:

Since the dispute was reported, some progress was already made on both

6081:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

2294: 1877:

in table, sources are always at the bottom, as per the manual of style

4661:

Note that if you did block me, you need to provide an explanation. --

1860: 1473:

You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month!

6366: 6246: 6213: 6177: 6155: 6123: 6108: 6059: 6043: 6017: 5974: 5903: 5836: 5774: 5716: 5662: 5611: 5562: 5520: 5482: 5450: 5416: 5393: 5371: 5352: 5302: 5275: 5169: 5149: 5095: 5039: 4877: 4851: 4832: 4802: 4788: 4762: 4734: 4707: 4686: 4670: 4641: 4611: 4590: 4572: 4558: 4535: 4502: 4474: 4449: 4420: 4389: 4363: 4311: 4283: 4239: 4218: 4181: 4151: 4130: 4103: 4039: 4015: 3909: 3831: 3798: 3781: 3758: 3732: 3698: 3626: 3581: 3556: 3530: 3495: 3483:– Do you have any accusations and a specific editor(s) to report? – 3471: 3409: 3394: 3380: 3336: 3319: 3304: 3283: 3264: 3231: 3197: 3168: 3150: 3109: 3078: 3046: 3009: 2990: 2968: 2941: 2925: 2844: 2823: 2808: 2775: 2751: 2732: 2707: 2693: 2677: 2654: 2630: 2595: 2570: 2551: 2521: 2507: 2490: 2462: 2416: 2394: 2376: 2338: 2316: 2283: 2267: 2237: 2214: 2200: 2183: 2158: 2131: 2100: 2086: 2072: 2054: 2039: 2006: 1955: 1941: 1927: 1912: 1902: 1883: 1839: 1819: 1791: 1775: 1752: 1726: 1712: 1696: 1666: 1636: 1620: 1604: 1574: 1558: 1512: 1482: 1439: 1421: 1402: 1383: 1340: 1268: 1245: 1226: 1194: 1172: 1154: 1138: 1118: 1099: 1077: 1057: 1025: 1013: 998: 972: 949: 934: 897: 881: 870: 854: 839: 825: 810: 791: 771: 756: 736: 716: 700: 685: 662: 627: 545: 527: 507: 479: 435: 417: 406: 400: 385: 362: 346: 319: 304: 282: 262: 230: 204: 182: 159: 144: 116: 100: 4250:

Undid revision 650964154 by GliderMaven (talk) unjustified rollback

2613:

For my part, I should apologize for the brutal conflict resolution

2119:

You were interested in this back in 2011. If you have a moment --

422:

I'm actually right. Anyway, I reported the issue with this page in

5653:

I fail to see why I would have to read your mind to get unblocked.

5599:

I fail to see why I would have to read your mind to get unblocked.

4753:

article. It was a surprisingly interesting read. Best Wishes. ---

2301:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

1084: 243: 1611:

for the notice, I'll add an explanation to that effect. Thanks --

5767:

You either get it or you don't. It seems, tragically, you don't.

3326: 1211:

User talk:Machine Elf 1735#Your complaint at the 3RR noticeboard

5030:, the involved administrator has failed to provide any remedy. 4817:

come down off the Reichstag and handed back the Spider-Man suit

2880:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 2814:

book-length study of this subject supported by JWales as well.

2020:

on what vandalism is and how to deal with (presumed) vandalism.

3188:

As for the hastiness to revert, I'm not sure what you mean. --

1766:. What do you mean by "it is unclear which shares presented"? 78:

to be used for uncontroversial deletions that do not meet the

55: 15: 6332:, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the 6168:

Which questions would you have posed in the section above? --

2145:. Sorry for the long delay. In case it still matters to you: 1810:

but could you have a look and see if it makes sense? Thanks.

6260: 6023:

I agree we have a language problem here. I was referring to

5175: 4883: 3914: 3841: 2853: 2569: 2293: 1494: 6355:

that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

6268:

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an

651:

Talk:Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_derivatives#Distro_popularity

3238:

Please stop deleting valid content without any discussion.

1426:

Well, that was a surprise, but "consensus" is not static,

649:

Hi there. Any ideas on the Distrowatch concerns I raised?

5410:

Do you think you got blocked indefinitely for no reason?

5309:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

5102:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

4046:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1522:

Hello Chealer! Can you please clarify a little about the

916:(or wherever it is in your distribution). When you write 583:, independent of commercial or other short-term politics 5329:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

5122:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

4066:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3817:

regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on

2617:

after your revert (as well as the one I performed after

2440:

regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on

2310:". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 2290:

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

1859:. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1251:

highly unrecommended. If you still have concerns about

1051:

and make any changes you think are required. Thanks! --

1038:

Hi, You have been involved in editing the article about

569:

10–30 minutes typically, quick and simple for new users.

6321: 6317: 6313: 6305: 6301: 6285: 6281: 6277: 6234:

The AN post you seem to refer to does not link to that.

6031: 5245: 5241: 5235: 5226: 5222: 5208: 5204: 5200: 5027: 5016: 5002: 4996: 4953: 4949: 4943: 4934: 4930: 4916: 4912: 4908: 4546: 4407:

You are free to refuse justifying, but as explained in

4350: 4325: 4245: 3984: 3980: 3974: 3965: 3961: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3355: 2871:

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being

2799:, effectively moving it to a more specific location. -- 2614: 2539: 2478: 2188: 2142: 1978: 1807: 1803: 1590: 1427: 1408: 1367: 1316: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1106: 1064:

Petrov are largely about the incident and not personal.

989:

Talk:Metrication/Archive 1#Dual calibrated speedometers

424:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532810

373: 331: 4028:

Clear pattern of edit-warring and disruptive editing.

1129:

Hello, do you have experience in source spotchecking?

6032:

the condition I set to answer more questions from you

5183:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

5073:

will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

4891:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3922:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

2912:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 1209:

Please see the advice regarding 3RR which I left at

964:

User talk:Peter Horn#Link from Metrication in Canada

564:

Last time, was removed f.ex. these characteristics:

4745:Thank you for your kind note on my addition of the 4577:Because it's disruptive and a continuation of your 1806:to the article which I just noticed. I've tried to 1503:In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 1185:

Hi, sorry, but I don't have the time to do this. --

3870:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 3815:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 3368:https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_fictitious_people 2438:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 672:Hi. You added a "clarification needed" tag in the 195:Yes, but the article doesn't define "PS2 Linux".-- 5765:But I already covered that in my previous reply: 3572:even more biased in favour of Knowledge... :-( -- 3085:Friendly nudge concerning policies and guidelines 2256:User talk:Ceyockey#Teva Pharmaceutical Industries 1319:once, but only to rehash the accusation of abuse. 4076:. Multiple editors were objecting to your edits 3878:by adding the following text below this notice: 3479:Curious as to the specifics of your COI edit to 2896:to work toward making a version that represents 2477:and concede the point. Somebody who reverts but 1946:As far as I know, the fix is good. Thank you! -- 70:Yo Chealer, regarding your proposed deletion of 6351:Please note that there could be appeals to the 2957:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2887:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 2344:Hi Tutelary. Thanks for your involvement with 1676:Hi, Are you willing and able to contribute at 150:Done. I was wondering what PS2 Linux meant. -- 3804:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 2427:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 8: 5063:the block is no longer necessary because you 4741:Knowledge (Pacific Standard receent article) 2174:template to denote a paywalled reference. -- 1918:supposed to support the problematic cell. -- 1362:is one of those which was recently cited at 90:. This article would very likely survive an 4545:. Do not edit the edit warring noticeboard 2865:shows that you are currently engaged in an 2473:, it might be better for you to respond at 1540:for that statement, it may help. Regards -- 1109:which I hope fixes the problem for good. -- 5070:understand what you have been blocked for, 168:You again put 'clarification' tags on the 1456: 914:/usr/share/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose 5707:What disruption are you referring to? -- 5511:What disruption are you referring to? -- 5384:What disruption are you referring to? -- 5026:... which is not the case. A week after 2303:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 2250:Responding to talk page input (ceyockey) 1049:1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident 5076:will make useful contributions instead. 3324:Yes, I meant it as a completment only! 3093:article I came across while serving at 801:Your change does clarify, thank you. -- 6008: 5893: 5766: 5652: 5361: 4340:The faulty editor rollbacked by error. 4248:edit? See how your edit summary says " 3521:itself while letting it be removed. -- 3097:, I'd like to encourage you to review 1762:I am confused about your confusion of 1678:Talk: Plurality (voting)#British Usage 88:it asserts as such in the very article 6079:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 7: 1652:Ah. I'll have to drop a note to the 1329:Knowledge:Revert only when necessary 1283:Knowledge:Revert only when necessary 762:Thanks, I think I understood now. -- 4523:(unless you promptly substantiate). 4463:think this block is over "one edit" 2955:There is currently a discussion at 2578:best with editing in the future :) 567:1) * Fully-automated installation; 405:Well, you're wrong. Have a look at 5266:(see previous appeal for details) 5136:qualified administrator to handle. 3181:Thanks. I did a lot of changes to 14: 5362:Which edits are you referring to? 4351:the faulty editor's previous edit 4006:multiple deadlines on Knowledge. 3099:Knowledge:Policies and guidelines 2758:Recent addition to Criticism page 2479:then won't discuss (when invited) 1802:Way back in February you added a 707:that part, hope it's better now. 407:http://www.debian.org/ports/m68k/ 72:Anarcho-capitalism and minarchism 6072: 5290:go read this archived discussion 4775:Thanks back. I integrated it in 4432:already been reviewed and upheld 3808: 3617:also even harder to maintain. -- 3423: 3345:Suggest You Fix Your Recent Edit 3325: 3023: 2950: 2431: 2220: 1850: 1457: 20: 3890:. However, you should read the 3738:List of Knowledge controversies 2876:—especially if you violate the 2861:Your recent editing history at 2716:System distribution commitments 2329:We are awaiting your response. 1581:Re: Edit notice on Free content 1273:I do still have concerns about 376:<- why did you remove m68k? 326:Gentoo ARM/MIPS citation needed 6114:How is that notice related? -- 4632:if you want to be unblocked.-- 3719:My change immediately reverted 2132:16:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 1956:21:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC) 1942:17:04, 26 September 2013 (UTC) 1764:Alberta general election, 2012 1758:Alberta general election, 2012 581:A non-commercial , free distro 546:16:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 528:10:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 508:23:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 310:Thanks, I went for the AfD. -- 117:03:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 101:20:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 6353:unblock ticket request system 6335:Unblock Ticket Request System 4086:not an edit warring exemption 4074:while the AN3 report was open 3854:from editing for a period of 3337:06:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC) 3320:05:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC) 3305:11:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC) 3284:21:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 3265:05:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 2969:15:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2942:04:27, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2238:04:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2215:03:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2201:03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2184:02:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 2159:02:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 1928:02:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 1315:In all this, the contributor 320:03:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 305:10:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 283:19:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 263:18:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 231:16:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 205:08:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 183:05:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 160:07:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 145:19:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC) 5365:blocked in the first place. 4793:Well done! Many thanks. --- 4461:What makes you claim that I 3733:14:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC) 3699:22:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 3627:21:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 3582:20:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 3557:20:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 3531:00:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 3472:00:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC) 3458:18:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 1840:18:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 1820:11:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 1585:The header is there because 1372:Knowledge:Close paraphrasing 1353:Knowledge:Close paraphrasing 1119:07:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1100:07:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 1078:20:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 987:I am inviting your input at 772:23:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 757:22:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 737:21:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 717:20:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 701:20:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 686:19:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 84:general notability guideline 5187:, who declined the request. 4895:, who declined the request. 3926:, who declined the request. 3496:18:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC) 3410:17:29, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 3395:17:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 3381:16:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 1058:23:34, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 480:03:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 6383: 5150:03:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC) 5096:04:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 5040:03:32, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 4878:03:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 4852:02:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC) 4833:21:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 4803:05:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4789:21:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 4763:15:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 4735:16:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4708:22:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 4687:22:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 4671:21:27, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 4654:I know I reverted. What I 4642:16:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 4612:01:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 4591:00:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 4573:22:57, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 4559:18:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 4536:00:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 4503:21:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC) 4475:20:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC) 4450:18:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC) 4421:16:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC) 4390:04:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 4364:13:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 4312:12:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 4284:03:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 4240:03:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 4219:03:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 4182:02:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 4152:21:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 4131:11:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 4104:06:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 4040:15:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 4016:03:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 3910:02:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 3832:16:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 3799:05:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 3232:21:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 3198:21:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 3169:17:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 3151:03:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 3110:02:04, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 3079:17:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC) 3047:13:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 3010:02:07, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 2991:01:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 2491:19:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC) 2463:13:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC) 2417:23:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC) 2395:06:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 2377:03:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 2339:02:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 2317:17:48, 27 April 2014 (UTC) 2284:03:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2268:23:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1977:The first time I reverted 1513:20:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 1440:22:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 1422:22:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 1403:21:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 1384:20:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 1213:. If you were to offer at 1026:23:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 1014:22:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 999:21:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 973:21:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 363:21:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 347:16:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 6330:guide to appealing blocks 5313:guide to appealing blocks 5106:guide to appealing blocks 5084:guide to appealing blocks 4050:guide to appealing blocks 3892:guide to appealing blocks 3872:make useful contributions 3788:Edit-warring at Knowledge 3782:20:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 3772:it (not to remove it). -- 3759:19:44, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 3253:time, patience and effort 3031:The Barnstar of Diligence 3022: 2926:13:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 2752:00:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 2733:10:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 2101:15:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 2087:13:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 2073:13:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 2055:10:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 2040:03:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 2007:02:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 1913:01:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 1903:01:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 1884:01:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 1483:18:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 1463: 1341:18:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 1269:14:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 1246:07:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 1227:05:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 1195:16:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 1173:00:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 1155:23:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 1139:21:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 950:06:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 935:17:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 898:06:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 882:06:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 871:20:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 855:20:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 840:20:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 826:20:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 811:20:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 792:19:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 663:20:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC) 436:20:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 418:13:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 6345:Ban Appeals Subcommittee 6242: 6173: 6119: 6039: 5970: 5832: 5712: 5607: 5516: 5446: 5389: 5348: 5271: 5165: 5145: 5035: 4873: 4847: 4784: 4730: 4703: 4666: 4607: 4568: 4531: 4470: 4416: 4359: 4307: 4235: 4177: 4126: 4011: 3777: 3694: 3622: 3577: 3526: 3467: 3405: 3315: 3294:Can you help with GA of 3279: 3227: 3193: 3146: 3074: 2845:20:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 2840: 2824:18:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 2809:17:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 2804: 2776:00:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC) 2747: 2708:20:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 2694:19:53, 18 May 2014 (UTC) 2689: 2678:03:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC) 2626: 2547: 2503: 2412: 2381:Hi! I am a volunteer at 2372: 2279: 2210: 2179: 2096: 2068: 2035: 1951: 1923: 1898: 1835: 1826:a proper formulation in 1792:04:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 1787: 1776:04:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 1753:05:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC) 1727:19:59, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 1713:19:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 1708: 1697:16:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 1667:05:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 1616: 1570: 1435: 1398: 1336: 1241: 1190: 1150: 1114: 1073: 1068:Thanks for your work. -- 1009: 945: 893: 866: 835: 821: 806: 767: 732: 696: 628:01:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC) 623: 541: 431: 401:21:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 396: 386:14:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 358: 315: 278: 200: 155: 130:You put up a tag on the 112: 6367:19:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 6247:01:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 6214:03:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 6178:03:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 6156:03:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 6124:02:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 6109:02:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 6060:15:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 6044:12:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 6018:04:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 5975:03:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 5904:03:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 5837:01:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC) 5775:03:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5717:03:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5663:03:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5656:tragically, you don't. 5612:02:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5563:02:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5521:02:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5483:02:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5451:02:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5417:01:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5394:01:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5372:01:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC) 5353:15:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC) 5303:15:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC) 5276:14:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC) 5170:14:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC) 4326:an unjustified rollback 3400:Done, thanks. Sorry. -- 2684:on discussion pages. -- 2655:22:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC) 2631:20:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC) 2596:19:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC) 2552:03:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 2540:has already been solved 2522:02:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 2508:01:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 1891:the article's Talk page 1646:Environmental economics 1637:00:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 1621:17:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 1605:05:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 1575:16:06, 3 May 2012 (UTC) 1559:15:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC) 1279:Naturalism (philosophy) 1257:Naturalism (philosophy) 575:Reliable, fast mirrors. 170:Linux for PlayStation 2 132:Linux for PlayStation 2 124:Linux for PlayStation 2 6265: 6030:Sorry, but I maintain 5180: 5086:for more information. 4888: 4777:Criticism of Knowledge 4197:not willing to hear it 3919: 3846: 3641:template documentation 3416:Because you thanked me 2858: 2793:Criticism of Knowledge 2764:Criticism of Knowledge 2574: 2298: 2137:Inaccessible reference 2012:Welcome Codename Lisa, 1591:Knowledge:Introduction 1500: 552:SYS Linux Distribution 6340:Arbitration Committee 6310:change block settings 6264: 5232:change block settings 5179: 4940:change block settings 4887: 4300:WP:Disruptive editing 4266:WP:Disruptive editing 3971:change block settings 3918: 3886:Your reason here ~~~~ 3845: 3290:Can you help with GA? 2857: 2573: 2297: 2169:Subscription required 1498: 1360:WP:Close paraphrasing 1351:Continued warring at 1234:User:Machine Elf 1735 3639:in keeping with the 3544:to you and yours! – 2873:blocked from editing 1536:? Btw have you seen 674:Quantum entanglement 668:Quantum Entanglement 5894:After 3 attempts... 4624:Block after warning 3270:Hi Engineering Guy, 3016:A barnstar for you! 2900:among editors. See 2358:LastPass (software) 2189:Progress marches on 2143:this query of yours 2028:Content negotiation 1812:CambridgeBayWeather 1467:The Modest Barnstar 1317:went to a Talk page 1105:OK, thanks. I made 6266: 5181: 4889: 3920: 3860:disruptive editing 3847: 2910:dispute resolution 2859: 2795:to remove it from 2575: 2299: 1501: 1450:A barnstar for you 1325:Knowledge:Civility 6356: 6212: 6185: 6154: 6107: 6068:Related AN notice 6058: 6016: 5902: 5773: 5661: 5561: 5481: 5415: 5370: 4831: 4496: 4443: 4383: 4277: 4254:repeatedly revert 4212: 4170:User:Ohnoitsjamie 4145: 4097: 3903: 3876:appeal this block 3830: 3797: 3757: 3656: 3604: 3553: 3492: 3456: 3455: 3349:Bonjour Chealer, 3248:English Knowledge 3242:Recently, on the 3052: 3051: 2878:three-revert rule 2448:. Thank you. – 2265: 1625:That is correct. 1488: 1487: 483: 466:comment added by 61: 60: 6374: 6364: 6350: 6325: 6302:abuse filter log 6298:deleted contribs 6263: 6206: 6200: 6197: 6194: 6191: 6184:to put it nicely 6183: 6148: 6142: 6139: 6136: 6133: 6101: 6095: 6092: 6089: 6086: 6076: 6075: 6057: 6015: 5901: 5772: 5660: 5560: 5480: 5414: 5369: 5341: 5326: 5320: 5251: 5249: 5238: 5220: 5218:deleted contribs 5178: 5134: 5119: 5113: 5082:Please read the 5021: 5020: 5012: 4992: 4990:deleted contribs 4959: 4957: 4946: 4928: 4926:deleted contribs 4886: 4825: 4774: 4747:Pacific Standard 4724: 4697: 4684: 4653: 4601: 4514: 4498: 4494: 4460: 4445: 4441: 4400: 4385: 4381: 4322: 4294: 4279: 4275: 4229: 4214: 4210: 4162: 4147: 4143: 4114: 4099: 4095: 4063: 4057: 4034: 3990: 3988: 3977: 3959: 3957:deleted contribs 3917: 3905: 3901: 3889: 3866:, as you did at 3829: 3821:. The thread is 3812: 3811: 3796: 3754: 3749: 3747: 3654: 3650: 3615: 3602: 3598: 3567: 3551: 3547: 3506: 3490: 3486: 3427: 3420: 3419: 3334: 3329: 3302: 3214: 3121: 3061: 3027: 3020: 3019: 2961:LawrencePrincipe 2954: 2953: 2934:LawrencePrincipe 2918:LawrencePrincipe 2834: 2831:LawrencePrincipe 2816:LawrencePrincipe 2787: 2785:LawrencePrincipe 2768:LawrencePrincipe 2648: 2589: 2456: 2444:. The thread is 2435: 2434: 2314: 2259: 2228: 2224: 2223: 2173: 2167: 1974:Hello, Philippe 1854: 1659: 1633: 1601: 1556: 1551: 1546: 1531: 1525: 1461: 1454: 1453: 1393:Thanks anyway -- 1055: 1045:Stanislav Petrov 1040:Stanislav Petrov 1034:Stanislav Petrov 978:Dual calibrated 919:<Compose: --> 915: 505: 501: 497: 482: 460: 98: 56: 24: 16: 6382: 6381: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6359: 6275: 6261: 6198: 6195: 6192: 6189: 6140: 6137: 6134: 6131: 6093: 6090: 6087: 6084: 6073: 6070: 5335: 5332: 5324: 5318: 5317:, then use the 5306: 5279: 5239: 5229: 5215: 5198: 5191:blocking policy 5176: 5128: 5125: 5117: 5111: 5110:, then use the 5099: 5043: 5024:WP:EXPLAINBLOCK 5005: 5003:edit filter log 4985: 4974: 4970: 4947: 4937: 4923: 4906: 4899:blocking policy 4884: 4813: 4768: 4743: 4718: 4691: 4677: 4647: 4626: 4595: 4508: 4493: 4489: 4454: 4440: 4436: 4394: 4380: 4376: 4316: 4288: 4274: 4270: 4223: 4209: 4205: 4156: 4142: 4138: 4108: 4094: 4090: 4069: 4061: 4055: 4054:, then use the 4043: 4032: 4019: 4002:the way, there 3978: 3968: 3954: 3937: 3930:blocking policy 3915: 3912: 3900: 3896: 3879: 3858:for persistent 3839: 3825:. Thank you. 3809: 3806: 3790: 3752: 3745: 3740: 3721: 3652: 3612:Paine Ellsworth 3609: 3600: 3564:Paine Ellsworth 3561: 3549: 3503:Paine Ellsworth 3500: 3488: 3449:Paine Ellsworth 3440: 3436: 3418: 3347: 3332: 3300: 3298:. Thank you. -- 3292: 3240: 3208: 3116: 3087: 3055: 3018: 2979: 2951: 2914:page protection 2828: 2782: 2760: 2718: 2665: 2642: 2583: 2568: 2450: 2432: 2429: 2349:a civil manner. 2327: 2312: 2292: 2252: 2221: 2219: 2171: 2165: 2139: 2117: 1972: 1970:Microsoft Visio 1848: 1800: 1760: 1737: 1674: 1672:Plural (voting) 1657: 1650: 1631: 1599: 1583: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1529: 1523: 1520: 1493: 1452: 1356: 1281:, and in fact, 1207: 1127: 1088: 1053: 1036: 983: 958: 921: 913: 906: 780: 670: 647: 554: 515: 503: 499: 495: 491: 461: 448: 371: 328: 293: 248: 128: 96: 80:speedy criteria 68: 57: 51: 29: 12: 11: 5: 6380: 6378: 6349: 6327: 6259: 6258: 6257: 6256: 6255: 6254: 6253: 6252: 6251: 6250: 6249: 6235: 6223: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6219: 6218: 6217: 6216: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6069: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6063: 6062: 6047: 6046: 6028: 6006: 6005: 6004: 6003: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5999: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5992: 5991: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5987: 5986: 5985: 5984: 5983: 5982: 5981: 5980: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5933: 5932: 5931: 5930: 5929: 5928: 5927: 5926: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5921: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5917: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5912: 5911: 5910: 5909: 5908: 5907: 5906: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5859: 5858: 5857: 5856: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5852: 5851: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5844: 5843: 5842: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5736: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5681: 5680: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5672: 5671: 5670: 5669: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5614: 5600: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5527: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5496: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5486: 5485: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5455: 5454: 5453: 5439: 5426: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5419: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5356: 5355: 5307: 5286: 5282:Decline reason 5260: 5256:Request reason 5253: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5153: 5152: 5137: 5100: 5080: 5079: 5078: 5077: 5074: 5071: 5065: 5064: 5061: 5050: 5046:Decline reason 4968: 4964:Request reason 4961: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4862: 4859: 4855: 4854: 4839: 4812: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4742: 4739: 4738: 4737: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4659: 4625: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4539: 4538: 4524: 4516: 4491: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4438: 4428:just appeal it 4406: 4403: 4378: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4348: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4338: 4335: 4332: 4314: 4297: 4272: 4207: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4140: 4119: 4116: 4092: 4044: 4026: 4022:Decline reason 3999: 3995:Request reason 3992: 3913: 3898: 3848:You have been 3840: 3838: 3835: 3805: 3802: 3789: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3766: 3739: 3736: 3720: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3637:Talk:Knowledge 3569: 3542:Happy New Year 3513: 3474: 3454: 3453: 3444: 3438: 3434: 3431: 3428: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3346: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3333:AmritasyaPutra 3301:AmritasyaPutra 3291: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3271: 3257:EngineeringGuy 3239: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3220: 3217:Talk:Knowledge 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3186: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3154: 3153: 3139: 3126: 3123: 3086: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3067: 3063: 3050: 3049: 3034: 3033: 3028: 3017: 3014: 3013: 3012: 2978: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2945: 2944: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2789: 2759: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2717: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2664: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2634: 2633: 2611: 2607: 2598: 2567: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2496: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2350: 2326: 2320: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2254:responding to 2251: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2141:This is about 2138: 2135: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2061: 2024: 2021: 2013: 1997: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1847: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1759: 1756: 1739:Nice edits on 1736: 1735:Knowledge page 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1673: 1670: 1649: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1532:tag you added 1519: 1516: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1470: 1469: 1464: 1462: 1451: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1391: 1355: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1320: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1158: 1157: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1065: 1054:Deadly∀ssassin 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 986: 982: 976: 962:Veuillez voir 961: 957: 954: 953: 952: 918: 905: 902: 901: 900: 874: 873: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 799: 779: 776: 775: 774: 740: 739: 704: 703: 669: 666: 646: 643: 631: 630: 612: 610: 609: 594: 586: 563: 553: 550: 549: 548: 514: 511: 490: 485: 450:Hey Chealer, 447: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 370: 367: 366: 365: 327: 324: 323: 322: 292: 287: 286: 285: 247: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 188: 187: 186: 185: 163: 162: 127: 126:clarification? 121: 120: 119: 67: 62: 59: 58: 53: 49: 47: 44: 43: 35: 34: 31: 30: 25: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6379: 6369: 6368: 6365: 6363: 6354: 6347: 6346: 6341: 6337: 6336: 6331: 6326: 6323: 6319: 6315: 6311: 6307: 6303: 6299: 6295: 6291: 6287: 6286:global blocks 6283: 6282:active blocks 6279: 6273: 6271: 6270:administrator 6248: 6244: 6240: 6236: 6233: 6232: 6231: 6230: 6229: 6228: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6215: 6210: 6205: 6202: 6201: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6175: 6171: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6163: 6162: 6157: 6152: 6147: 6144: 6143: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6121: 6117: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6105: 6100: 6097: 6096: 6080: 6067: 6061: 6056: 6051: 6050: 6049: 6048: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6026: 6022: 6021: 6020: 6019: 6014: 6010: 5976: 5972: 5968: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5949: 5948: 5947: 5946: 5945: 5944: 5943: 5942: 5941: 5940: 5939: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5905: 5900: 5895: 5892: 5891: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5886: 5885: 5884: 5883: 5882: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5878: 5877: 5876: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5872: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5838: 5834: 5830: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5821: 5820: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5816: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5808: 5807: 5806: 5805: 5804: 5803: 5802: 5801: 5776: 5771: 5768: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5754: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5747: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5741: 5718: 5714: 5710: 5706: 5705: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5699: 5698: 5697: 5696: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5692: 5691: 5690: 5689: 5688: 5687: 5686: 5685: 5664: 5659: 5654: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5613: 5609: 5605: 5601: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5564: 5559: 5555: 5552: 5551: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5522: 5518: 5514: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5498: 5497: 5484: 5479: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5418: 5413: 5409: 5408: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5403: 5402: 5395: 5391: 5387: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5373: 5368: 5363: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5339: 5334: 5333: 5331: 5330: 5323: 5316: 5314: 5305: 5304: 5300: 5296: 5291: 5285: 5283: 5278: 5277: 5273: 5269: 5265: 5262:Violation of 5259: 5257: 5252: 5247: 5243: 5237: 5233: 5228: 5224: 5219: 5214: 5210: 5209:global blocks 5206: 5205:active blocks 5202: 5197: 5192: 5188: 5186: 5185:administrator 5171: 5167: 5163: 5159: 5155: 5154: 5151: 5147: 5143: 5138: 5132: 5127: 5126: 5124: 5123: 5116: 5109: 5107: 5098: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5075: 5072: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5062: 5060: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5049: 5047: 5042: 5041: 5037: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5018: 5015: 5011: 5008: 5004: 5001: 4998: 4995: 4991: 4988: 4984: 4981: 4978: 4973: 4967: 4965: 4960: 4955: 4951: 4945: 4941: 4936: 4932: 4927: 4922: 4918: 4917:global blocks 4914: 4913:active blocks 4910: 4905: 4900: 4896: 4894: 4893:administrator 4879: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4860: 4857: 4856: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4840: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4829: 4824: 4823: 4818: 4810: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4772: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4728: 4722: 4717: 4716: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4695: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4685: 4682: 4681: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4668: 4664: 4660: 4657: 4651: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4623: 4613: 4609: 4605: 4599: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4541: 4540: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4522: 4517: 4512: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4501: 4499: 4497: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4458: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4448: 4446: 4444: 4433: 4429: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4398: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4388: 4386: 4384: 4373: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4352: 4345: 4339: 4336: 4333: 4330: 4329: 4327: 4320: 4315: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4301: 4292: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4282: 4280: 4278: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4237: 4233: 4227: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4217: 4215: 4213: 4202: 4198: 4193: 4192: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4160: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4150: 4148: 4146: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4112: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4102: 4100: 4098: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4068: 4067: 4060: 4053: 4051: 4042: 4041: 4038: 4037: 4035: 4025: 4023: 4018: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 3998: 3996: 3991: 3986: 3982: 3976: 3972: 3967: 3963: 3958: 3953: 3949: 3948:global blocks 3945: 3944:active blocks 3941: 3936: 3931: 3927: 3925: 3924:administrator 3911: 3908: 3906: 3904: 3893: 3887: 3883: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3852: 3844: 3836: 3834: 3833: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3803: 3801: 3800: 3795: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3755: 3748: 3737: 3735: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3718: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3658: 3657: 3655: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3613: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3603: 3594: 3590: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3570: 3565: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3555: 3554: 3552: 3543: 3539: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3519: 3514: 3510: 3504: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3494: 3493: 3491: 3482: 3478: 3475: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3443: 3442: 3429: 3426: 3422: 3421: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3383: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3365: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3353: 3350: 3344: 3338: 3335: 3328: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3303: 3297: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3272: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3249: 3245: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3218: 3212: 3207: 3206: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3184: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3170: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3137: 3132: 3127: 3124: 3120: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3059: 3054: 3053: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3029: 3026: 3021: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2976: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2890: 2888: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2874: 2868: 2864: 2856: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2832: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2721: 2715: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2700:RockMagnetist 2697: 2696: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670:RockMagnetist 2662: 2656: 2653: 2651: 2649: 2647: 2646: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2597: 2594: 2592: 2590: 2588: 2587: 2579: 2572: 2566: 2563: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2459: 2457: 2455: 2454: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2426: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2325: 2321: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2309: 2304: 2296: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2264: 2263: 2257: 2249: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2170: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2136: 2134: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2124:74.192.84.101 2122:. Thanks. 2121: 2115:OpenJDK et al 2114: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2079:Codename Lisa 2076: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2047:Codename Lisa 2043: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2022: 2019: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1999:Codename Lisa 1996:Best regards, 1994: 1992: 1987: 1982: 1980: 1975: 1969: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934:74.192.84.101 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1853: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1757: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1734: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1681: 1679: 1671: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1655: 1647: 1644: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1629: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1588: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1539: 1535: 1528: 1517: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1497: 1490: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1449: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1428:it can change 1425: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1354: 1350: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1286: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1204: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1050: 1046: 1041: 1033: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 997: 994: 990: 981: 977: 975: 974: 971: 968: 965: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 938: 937: 936: 932: 928: 924: 917: 911: 903: 899: 895: 891: 886: 885: 884: 883: 880: 879:Peter morrell 872: 868: 864: 859: 858: 857: 856: 853: 852:Peter morrell 841: 837: 833: 829: 828: 827: 823: 819: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 795: 794: 793: 790: 789:Peter morrell 786: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 754: 750: 744: 738: 734: 730: 726: 721: 720: 719: 718: 714: 710: 702: 698: 694: 690: 689: 688: 687: 683: 679: 675: 667: 665: 664: 660: 656: 652: 644: 642: 639: 635: 629: 625: 621: 617: 616: 615: 607: 606: 605: 601: 597: 592: 589: 584: 582: 577: 576: 571: 570: 565: 561: 558: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 533: 530: 529: 525: 521: 520:CoolingGibbon 512: 510: 509: 506: 498: 489: 486: 484: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 457: 455: 451: 445: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 415: 411: 408: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 390: 389: 388: 387: 383: 379: 375: 368: 364: 360: 356: 351: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 335: 333: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 291: 290:Feather Linux 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 245: 242: 232: 228: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 206: 202: 198: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 184: 180: 176: 171: 167: 166: 165: 164: 161: 157: 153: 149: 148: 147: 146: 142: 138: 133: 125: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 104: 103: 102: 99: 97:the skomorokh 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 66: 63: 46: 45: 42: 41: 37: 36: 33: 32: 28: 23: 18: 17: 6361: 6357: 6343: 6333: 6306:creation log 6274: 6267: 6188: 6130: 6083: 6071: 6024: 6007: 5553: 5328: 5310: 5308: 5287: 5281: 5280: 5261: 5255: 5254: 5227:creation log 5194: 5182: 5121: 5103: 5101: 5081: 5058: 5051: 5045: 5044: 5013: 5006: 4999: 4993: 4986: 4979: 4969: 4963: 4962: 4935:creation log 4902: 4890: 4865: 4820: 4814: 4744: 4679: 4678: 4655: 4627: 4542: 4490: 4485: 4462: 4437: 4431: 4427: 4409:WP:ADMINACCT 4377: 4271: 4253: 4249: 4206: 4200: 4139: 4091: 4085: 4077: 4073: 4065: 4047: 4045: 4029: 4027: 4021: 4020: 4000: 3994: 3993: 3966:creation log 3933: 3921: 3897: 3885: 3864:edit warring 3855: 3849: 3819:edit warring 3807: 3791: 3769: 3741: 3722: 3649: 3648: 3644: 3597: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3546: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3517: 3508: 3485: 3484: 3476: 3457: 3448: 3446: 3433: 3432: 3384: 3371: 3366: 3363: 3359: 3354: 3351: 3348: 3293: 3252: 3241: 3162: 3161: 3103: 3102: 3088: 3030: 2980: 2977:Reporting me 2891: 2886: 2870: 2860: 2763: 2761: 2722: 2719: 2666: 2645:FenixFeather 2644: 2643: 2604:FenixFeather 2586:FenixFeather 2585: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2453:FenixFeather 2452: 2451: 2442:edit warring 2430: 2328: 2300: 2260: 2253: 2225: 2140: 2118: 1995: 1985: 1983: 1976: 1973: 1876: 1873:my talk page 1865:edit summary 1849: 1801: 1761: 1738: 1682: 1675: 1661: 1651: 1626: 1594: 1587:Free content 1584: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1521: 1502: 1466: 1358:The page at 1357: 1208: 1128: 1125:spotchecking 1107:another edit 1089: 1037: 1018:Have "fun". 984: 980:speedometers 959: 925: 922: 907: 875: 848: 781: 745: 741: 724: 705: 671: 648: 640: 636: 632: 611: 602: 598: 593: 590: 585: 580: 578: 574: 572: 568: 566: 562: 559: 555: 531: 516: 492: 458: 452: 449: 372: 369:m68k support 336: 329: 294: 269: 253: 249: 129: 87: 75: 69: 38: 26: 3536:effort. A 3509:accusations 2998:David Beals 2906:noticeboard 2615:I performed 2365:discussions 1875:. Thanks! 1855:Hello, I'm 1804:clarify tag 1798:Quebec City 1505:66.87.2.217 1275:Materialism 1253:Materialism 1165:LittleJerry 1131:LittleJerry 985:Hi Philippe 910:Compose key 908:Concerning 904:Compose key 462:—Preceding 6360:Jezebel's 6290:autoblocks 5223:filter log 5010:block user 4931:filter log 4244:Sigh. See 3962:filter log 3837:March 2015 3296:Heartbleed 3058:PhilKnight 3039:PhilKnight 3002:PhilKnight 2983:JA 1983 JA 2602:Thank you 2514:EdJohnston 2483:EdJohnston 2354:Heartbleed 2346:Heartbleed 2322:Engage in 2308:Heartbleed 2262:talk to me 2230:Paradoctor 2193:Paradoctor 2151:Paradoctor 2147:WP:PAYWALL 1986:persisting 1808:explain it 1717:Thanks. -- 1663:Niceguyedc 1654:WP:CLEANER 1534:Arfa Karim 1518:Arfa Karim 1499:WikiThanks 1491:WikiThanks 1475:66.87.0.36 1414:EdJohnston 1376:EdJohnston 1261:EdJohnston 1219:EdJohnston 1020:Peter Horn 993:Peter Horn 967:Peter Horn 923:you get ™ 785:relativism 778:Relativism 330:Regarding 246:notability 74:: PROD is 40:/Archive 1 6318:checkuser 6278:block log 6207:Please {{ 6149:Please {{ 6102:Please {{ 6053:of luck. 5438:report... 5311:read the 5242:checkuser 5201:block log 5104:read the 5017:block log 4950:checkuser 4909:block log 4795:Wikiklrsc 4771:Wikiklrsc 4755:Wikiklrsc 4751:Knowledge 4258:Knowledge 4201:justified 4166:Knowledge 4082:Knowledge 4048:read the 3981:checkuser 3940:block log 3868:Knowledge 3633:WP:OUTING 3481:Knowledge 3244:Knowledge 3183:Knowledge 3136:Knowledge 3131:Knowledge 3091:Knowledge 2898:consensus 2894:talk page 2863:Knowledge 2797:Knowledge 2565:Apologies 2387:Guy Macon 2313:EarwigBot 2060:Viewer"). 2018:vandalism 1979:this edit 1846:June 2013 1768:117Avenue 1745:CaseyPenk 1741:Knowledge 1683:See also 1092:Gallaecio 1023:User talk 996:User talk 970:User talk 725:envelopes 337:Thanks -- 255:Sidfilter 6294:contribs 5213:contribs 5158:WP:ADMIN 4983:contribs 4921:contribs 4033:itsJamie 3952:contribs 3894:first. 3884:|reason= 3856:72 hours 3746:Gamaliel 3725:deisenbe 3591:of us. 3211:Eustress 3164:Eustress 3160:Cheers — 3119:Eustress 3105:Eustress 2908:or seek 2885:warring— 2867:edit war 2619:Tutelary 2362:relevant 2331:Tutelary 1828:Edmonton 488:EduLinux 476:contribs 468:V7-sport 464:unsigned 446:Iran 655 270:possibly 223:TreyGeek 175:TreyGeek 137:TreyGeek 27:Archives 6314:unblock 6239:Chealer 6170:Chealer 6116:Chealer 6036:Chealer 5967:Chealer 5829:Chealer 5709:Chealer 5604:Chealer 5513:Chealer 5443:Chealer 5386:Chealer 5345:Chealer 5322:unblock 5268:Chealer 5236:unblock 5196:Chealer 5162:Chealer 5142:Chealer 5115:unblock 5032:Chealer 4944:unblock 4904:Chealer 4870:Chealer 4868:now. -- 4866:anytime 4844:Chealer 4811:Blocked 4781:Chealer 4779:too. -- 4727:Chealer 4700:Chealer 4663:Chealer 4604:Chealer 4579:refusal 4565:Chealer 4563:Why? -- 4547:archive 4543:Warning 4528:Chealer 4495:warm... 4467:Chealer 4442:warm... 4413:Chealer 4405:stance. 4382:warm... 4356:Chealer 4304:Chealer 4276:warm... 4232:Chealer 4211:warm... 4174:Chealer 4144:warm... 4123:Chealer 4096:warm... 4059:unblock 4008:Chealer 3975:unblock 3935:Chealer 3902:warm... 3882:unblock 3851:blocked 3774:Chealer 3765:answer. 3691:Chealer 3619:Chealer 3574:Chealer 3523:Chealer 3464:Chealer 3441:ELCOME! 3402:Chealer 3387:Megapod 3385:Edited 3373:Megapod 3312:Chealer 3276:Chealer 3224:Chealer 3190:Chealer 3143:Chealer 3095:WP:RFPP 3071:Chealer 2882:reverts 2837:Chealer 2801:Chealer 2744:Chealer 2686:Chealer 2663:Tagging 2623:Chealer 2544:Chealer 2500:Chealer 2409:Chealer 2369:Chealer 2276:Chealer 2207:Chealer 2176:Chealer 2093:Chealer 2065:Chealer 2032:Chealer 1948:Chealer 1920:Chealer 1895:Chealer 1869:sandbox 1832:Chealer 1784:Chealer 1705:Chealer 1632:Faraone 1613:Chealer 1600:Faraone 1567:Chealer 1432:Chealer 1395:Chealer 1390:revert. 1333:Chealer 1327:and to 1238:Chealer 1205:Dispute 1187:Chealer 1147:Chealer 1111:Chealer 1070:Chealer 1006:Chealer 960:Philipe 956:Réponse 942:Chealer 890:Chealer 863:Chealer 832:Chealer 818:Chealer 803:Chealer 764:Chealer 729:Chealer 693:Chealer 620:Chealer 538:Chealer 504:Windows 428:Chealer 410:Armin76 393:Chealer 378:Armin76 355:Chealer 339:Armin76 312:Chealer 275:Chealer 197:Chealer 152:Chealer 109:Chealer 65:WP:PROD 6204:(talk) 6146:(talk) 6099:(talk) 4630:WP:GAB 4521:WP:NPA 4078:at AN3 3538:Joyous 3437:OU'RE 3115:Hello 2475:WP:AN3 2471:WP:DRN 2383:WP:DRN 2324:WP:DRN 2191:. ^_^ 1991:WP:BRD 1910:Aunva6 1881:Aunva6 1861:Radeon 1857:Aunva6 1538:source 1409:undone 1215:WP:AN3 749:Tercer 709:Tercer 678:Tercer 655:Rfsmit 513:Thanks 496:Fences 297:Stifle 6362:Ponyo 6055:Δρ.Κ. 6013:Δρ.Κ. 5899:Δρ.Κ. 5770:Δρ.Κ. 5658:Δρ.Κ. 5558:Δρ.Κ. 5478:Δρ.Κ. 5412:Δρ.Κ. 5367:Δρ.Κ. 5315:first 5264:WP:BP 5131:Bbb23 5108:first 5088:Bbb23 4828:Help! 4721:Bbb23 4656:still 4650:Bbb23 4634:Bbb23 4598:Bbb23 4583:Bbb23 4551:Bbb23 4511:Swarm 4457:Swarm 4397:Swarm 4319:Swarm 4291:Swarm 4262:WP:EW 4226:Swarm 4159:Swarm 4111:Swarm 4052:first 3827:Δρ.Κ. 3794:Δρ.Κ. 3653:Paine 3645:Joys! 3601:Paine 3593:Joys! 3550:Paine 3489:Paine 1305:laws. 1085:HTML5 927:Ceplm 579:3) * 573:2) * 500:& 244:C2Net 6243:talk 6174:talk 6120:talk 6040:talk 6034:. -- 5971:talk 5833:talk 5713:talk 5608:talk 5517:talk 5447:talk 5390:talk 5349:talk 5338:Only 5299:talk 5295:only 5272:talk 5166:talk 5146:talk 5092:talk 5036:talk 4997:logs 4977:talk 4874:talk 4848:talk 4799:talk 4785:talk 4759:talk 4731:talk 4704:talk 4667:talk 4638:talk 4608:talk 4587:talk 4569:talk 4555:talk 4532:talk 4471:talk 4417:talk 4360:talk 4308:talk 4246:this 4236:talk 4178:talk 4127:talk 4031:OhNo 4012:talk 3862:and 3778:talk 3770:move 3753:talk 3729:talk 3695:talk 3623:talk 3578:talk 3540:and 3527:talk 3468:talk 3406:talk 3391:talk 3377:talk 3316:talk 3280:talk 3261:talk 3246:and 3228:talk 3194:talk 3147:talk 3075:talk 3043:talk 3006:talk 2987:talk 2965:talk 2938:talk 2922:talk 2841:talk 2820:talk 2805:talk 2772:talk 2748:talk 2729:talk 2720:Hi, 2704:talk 2690:talk 2674:talk 2627:talk 2548:talk 2542:. -- 2518:talk 2504:talk 2487:talk 2413:talk 2391:talk 2373:talk 2367:. -- 2356:and 2335:talk 2280:talk 2234:talk 2226:Done 2211:talk 2197:talk 2180:talk 2155:talk 2128:talk 2097:talk 2083:talk 2069:talk 2051:talk 2036:talk 2003:talk 1952:talk 1938:talk 1924:talk 1899:talk 1836:talk 1816:talk 1788:talk 1772:talk 1749:talk 1723:talk 1709:talk 1693:talk 1687:. -- 1658:poly 1648:edit 1617:talk 1571:talk 1527:fact 1509:talk 1479:talk 1436:talk 1418:talk 1399:talk 1380:talk 1368:here 1337:talk 1265:talk 1255:and 1242:talk 1223:talk 1191:talk 1169:talk 1151:talk 1135:talk 1115:talk 1096:talk 1074:talk 1047:and 1010:talk 946:talk 931:talk 894:talk 867:talk 836:talk 822:talk 807:talk 768:talk 753:talk 733:talk 713:talk 697:talk 682:talk 659:talk 645:RHEL 624:talk 542:talk 524:talk 472:talk 432:talk 426:. -- 414:talk 397:talk 382:talk 359:talk 343:talk 316:talk 301:talk 279:talk 259:talk 227:talk 201:talk 179:talk 156:talk 141:talk 113:talk 76:only 6342:'s 6324:)) 6322:log 6199:Fir 6196:een 6193:rgr 6190:Eve 6141:Fir 6138:een 6135:rgr 6132:Eve 6094:Fir 6091:een 6088:rgr 6085:Eve 5554:You 5246:log 5193:). 4972:Jzg 4954:log 4901:). 4822:Guy 4694:Liz 4402:it. 4004:are 3985:log 3932:). 3589:all 3477:PS. 2916:. 2902:BRD 2781:Hi 2740:Yoe 2738:Hi 2725:Yoe 1879:-- 1719:P64 1689:P64 1680:? 920:tm 641:wl 92:AfD 6316:• 6312:• 6308:• 6304:• 6300:• 6296:• 6292:• 6288:• 6284:• 6280:• 6245:) 6211:}} 6209:re 6176:) 6153:}} 6151:re 6122:) 6106:}} 6104:re 6042:) 6025:my 5973:) 5965:-- 5835:) 5715:) 5610:) 5519:) 5449:) 5392:) 5351:) 5343:-- 5325:}} 5319:{{ 5301:) 5284:: 5274:) 5258:: 5240:• 5234:• 5230:• 5225:• 5221:• 5216:• 5211:• 5207:• 5203:• 5168:) 5148:) 5140:-- 5118:}} 5112:{{ 5094:) 5059:or 5048:: 5038:) 4966:: 4948:• 4942:• 4938:• 4933:• 4929:• 4924:• 4919:• 4915:• 4911:• 4876:) 4850:) 4842:-- 4801:) 4787:) 4761:) 4733:) 4706:) 4683:iz 4669:) 4640:) 4610:) 4589:) 4571:) 4557:) 4534:) 4473:) 4419:) 4362:) 4354:-- 4310:) 4238:) 4180:) 4129:) 4121:-- 4062:}} 4056:{{ 4024:: 4014:) 3997:: 3979:• 3973:• 3969:• 3964:• 3960:• 3955:• 3950:• 3946:• 3942:• 3888:}} 3880:{{ 3780:) 3731:) 3697:) 3647:– 3625:) 3595:– 3580:) 3529:) 3470:) 3408:) 3393:) 3379:) 3318:) 3282:) 3263:) 3230:) 3196:) 3149:) 3141:-- 3077:) 3045:) 3008:) 2989:) 2967:) 2940:) 2924:) 2869:. 2843:) 2822:) 2807:) 2774:) 2750:) 2731:) 2706:) 2692:) 2676:) 2629:) 2581:– 2550:) 2520:) 2506:) 2489:) 2415:) 2393:) 2375:) 2337:) 2282:) 2266:) 2236:) 2213:) 2199:) 2182:) 2172:}} 2166:{{ 2157:) 2130:) 2099:) 2085:) 2071:) 2053:) 2038:) 2005:) 1993:. 1954:) 1940:) 1926:) 1901:) 1838:) 1818:) 1790:) 1782:-- 1774:) 1751:) 1725:) 1711:) 1703:-- 1695:) 1619:) 1593:. 1573:) 1530:}} 1524:{{ 1511:) 1481:) 1438:) 1420:) 1401:) 1382:) 1339:) 1277:, 1267:) 1244:) 1225:) 1193:) 1171:) 1153:) 1145:-- 1137:) 1117:) 1098:) 1076:) 1012:) 991:. 948:) 933:) 896:) 869:) 861:-- 838:) 824:) 816:-- 809:) 770:) 755:) 735:) 715:) 699:) 684:) 661:) 653:-- 626:) 544:) 526:) 518:-- 478:) 474:• 434:) 416:) 399:) 384:) 361:) 353:-- 345:) 318:) 303:) 281:) 273:-- 261:) 229:) 203:) 181:) 173:-- 158:) 143:) 135:-- 115:) 107:-- 86:, 6348:. 6320:( 6276:( 6241:( 6172:( 6118:( 6038:( 5969:( 5831:( 5711:( 5606:( 5515:( 5445:( 5388:( 5347:( 5340:: 5336:@ 5297:( 5270:( 5250:) 5248:) 5244:( 5199:( 5164:( 5144:( 5133:: 5129:@ 5090:( 5034:( 5019:) 5014:· 5007:· 5000:· 4994:· 4987:· 4980:· 4975:( 4958:) 4956:) 4952:( 4907:( 4872:( 4846:( 4830:) 4826:( 4797:( 4783:( 4773:: 4769:@ 4757:( 4729:( 4723:: 4719:@ 4702:( 4696:: 4692:@ 4680:L 4665:( 4652:: 4648:@ 4636:( 4606:( 4600:: 4596:@ 4585:( 4567:( 4553:( 4530:( 4513:: 4509:@ 4492:S 4469:( 4459:: 4455:@ 4439:S 4415:( 4399:: 4395:@ 4379:S 4358:( 4321:: 4317:@ 4306:( 4293:: 4289:@ 4273:S 4234:( 4228:: 4224:@ 4208:S 4176:( 4161:: 4157:@ 4141:S 4125:( 4113:: 4109:@ 4093:S 4010:( 3989:) 3987:) 3983:( 3938:( 3899:S 3776:( 3756:) 3750:( 3727:( 3693:( 3621:( 3614:: 3610:@ 3576:( 3566:: 3562:@ 3525:( 3518:I 3505:: 3501:@ 3466:( 3439:W 3435:Y 3404:( 3389:( 3375:( 3314:( 3278:( 3259:( 3226:( 3213:: 3209:@ 3192:( 3145:( 3122:, 3117:@ 3073:( 3060:: 3056:@ 3041:( 3004:( 2985:( 2963:( 2936:( 2920:( 2839:( 2833:: 2829:@ 2818:( 2803:( 2788:, 2783:@ 2770:( 2746:( 2727:( 2702:( 2688:( 2672:( 2625:( 2546:( 2516:( 2502:( 2485:( 2411:( 2389:( 2371:( 2333:( 2306:" 2278:( 2232:( 2209:( 2195:( 2178:( 2153:( 2126:( 2095:( 2081:( 2067:( 2049:( 2034:( 2001:( 1950:( 1936:( 1922:( 1897:( 1834:( 1814:( 1786:( 1770:( 1747:( 1721:( 1707:( 1691:( 1628:L 1615:( 1596:L 1569:( 1554:S 1549:M 1544:S 1507:( 1477:( 1434:( 1416:( 1397:( 1378:( 1335:( 1263:( 1240:( 1221:( 1189:( 1167:( 1149:( 1133:( 1113:( 1094:( 1072:( 1008:( 944:( 929:( 892:( 865:( 834:( 820:( 805:( 766:( 751:( 731:( 711:( 695:( 680:( 657:( 622:( 540:( 522:( 470:( 430:( 412:( 395:( 380:( 357:( 341:( 314:( 299:( 277:( 257:( 225:( 199:( 177:( 154:( 139:( 111:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index