User talk:Chip.berlet

1923:(see above comments added by this account), whom I've blocked as a sock. @Chip.berlet, honestly, I don't know what to make of this. Note's comments are almost incoherent and full of signatures despite being only one post. The possiblities of what's going on are not great: (1) these are friends of yours, (2) they are your socks and you're screwing around making them look very different behavior-wise from you, or (3) they have nothing to do with you despite the technical evidence and the obvious interest in the same person. Normally, with another apparent sock introduced in the mix, I would increase your block length, probably to indefinite. Yet, I'm not doing that for the moment as this whole thing feels so damned odd.-- 1783:

to be posting on Knowledge. The only evidence presented consists of sequential posts, with my posts ending when I took the train to Philadelphia from Boston. I request a reconsideration of this block as it is in error based on insufficient evidence. In addition, I am a professional working journalist with bylines in the New York Times, Boston Globe, Chicago Sun-Times, Des Moines Register, and other publications both popular and scholarly including peer review articles. This block undermines my credibility and integrity in a public manner. I would never risk my reputation by creating a sock puppet when the editing of the page for

622:. I have not yet reviewed the details of who was edit-warring about what aspect of Chip Berlet's career. If you read the details of the discretionary sanctions template, it is not "gratuitous", and it states that it does not imply blame, but is a reminder to use caution because failure to use caution may result in quick sanctions by uninvolved administrators. The template is a reminder to cut out the edit wars and dial down the rhetoric, and, in my experience, discretionary sanctions templates do work for that purpose. 1318: 4692: 2388: 2264: 1423: 1702: 4258: 3187: 2863: 2312: 1062: 989: 39: 93:

permanently blocked because they turned out to be sock puppets for the LaRouchite organization. Other editors have been suspended. This is not the first time this has happened. I know the system here but I also know the history here. Please do not dismiss my concerns with such a glib response. Administrator attention and comments on the talk page has calmed the discussion down quickly in the past.

4408: 3896: 3470: 2481: 4552: 4154: 3804: 3093: 2780: 2630: 2046: 3357: 2953: 2693: 2170: 4610: 4099: 4043: 1615: 181:. All except for the last are generally moderated by editors. So please, do not mistake my assessment that a "sysop" was not needed here as being ill-informed, but rather substantive in that the help you are looking for can be offered by anyone. I closed the sysop help request since no specific technical use of the tools we possess was requested, and where 857: 1284: 3775:

Thanks, Sorry. I misunderstood. . One of the criticisms was that "Source Catalogs" could not be found on a Google search. Since they were print publications published before the Internet spawned the World Wide Web, that is hardly surprising. Verifiable by a "Google Search?" Sigh.... I am over 70 and

1782:

In ten years I have never used a Sockpuppet. During the period I am accused of using a sockpuppet I was attending the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in Philadelphia. I was either in the convention hall or at the Aloft hotel. While I had internet access I had no time or energy

700:

Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give disproportionate space to particular viewpoints; the views of tiny minorities should not be included

160:

willing editor. An editor with the sysop tool is granted no more authority over moderating a content dispute as any other editor. We may benefit from having the tools to immediately block disruptive vandals or editors who are edit warring, but if you happen to see any of that activity, you can simply

4722:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

1502:) 17:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Keep It seems we are confused by the order of names here. In most citations, Kapya Kaoma as opposed to Kapya John Kaoma is used; suggesting two different individuals, which not the case. Both are referring to the same individual. Kapya Kaoma is a well known figure. -- 458:

It would be a waste to lose any viable material that was there before. I noticed you copied that over there. While you can't edit directly this is not directly. But as I said my ability to verify is limited to the internet. Also I think would be a good idea to take any proposed changes to the talk

361:

I rather think the issue is that it is a cheap shot from Wilcox who has gone out of his way to say nasty things about me. I do not think your edits overall have helped contribute to an NPOV article. Just my opinion. Probably that is what got a note on your page. It is not hard to find more credible

3412:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3008:

2744:

2234:

2139:

704:

The idea expressed in WP:Eventualism – that every Knowledge article is a work in progress, and that it is therefore okay for an article to be temporarily unbalanced because it will eventually be brought into shape – does not apply to biographies. Given their potential impact on biography subjects'

1973:

I on a Verizon FIOS broadband as is much of the Boston area. We live in a house with a single dongle connection to a pole in the street. Our neighborhood alone has scores of connections to Verizon. Beyond that I do not know enough about how the Verizon network operates. I did post on my Facebook

1945:

An alternative explanation is that some of my many political detractors are creating fake sock puppets to mess with me. It took Arbcom months to figure out that there was a concerted attack on my credibility on Knowledge by LaRouchites and right-wing cranks. I finally got involved with a closed

819:

were CSA Confederates that emigrated to Brazil after the Civil war was lost. Slavery didn't end there until 1888 if I recall. Brazil is the 7th largest economy. The largest economy in Latin America. Large population. It's somewhat comparable to the US. How the Confederados differ just could be

110:

Chip, if I may, I would like to clarify for you what it is sysops do here on Knowledge. Perhaps this will clarify why a sysop is not required to balance and resolve your content dispute, but rather any editor willing to volunteer their time and effort. Let's first look at your initial request,

92:

An administrator in the past has steped in and helped reframe the discussion for fairness and accuracy because there have been repeated attempts over 5 years to attack my reputation through Knowledge editing that is biased, incomplete, and often just factually false. Several editors have been

1074:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

155:

Based upon your initial request, which of these functions in particular will resolve your problem? The answer is they won't. What you need, as you stated, is someone to get the discussion back on track and to moderate the discussion. Fortunately for you, that task can be undertaken by

1862:. I haven't a clue. I got up in the morning and went to the conference and then went to dinner, and then back to the hotel and fell asleep. I did answer a few e-mails, but otherwise was not paying attention to Knowledge. I am almost 70 years old and no longer have the bandwidth. :-). 2324:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

362:

criticisms of my work if you have access to a print library or online scholarly database. Some of the critics are friends or colleagues. I don't mind criticism, but much of the criticism on my entry was by right-wing ideologues with a bone to pick. Hardly NPOV. Thanks for asking

1946:

discussion on this type of harassment with other targeted editors and Jimmy Wales. This is not a new tactic if that is what is happening. Sigh. For the record, I have edited a page on a neonazi group with a neonazi--and we both behaved apprpriately within Knowledge guidelines.

2414:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2290:

1449:

1001:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2086:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of 74:

You've involved in an editorial dispute. Several editors have responded to you on the article talk page and you've already opened up an RFC to discuss your concerns. An administrator (an editor with additional technical tools) is not required here.

3064:

Articles on living people must be fully sourced to reliable references from the outset. You might consider working on articles in your own userspace sandbox and publishing them only when completed -- I find it it saves a lot of hassle. Cheers,

3052:

and was entering text when you tagged it for speedy deletion. Adding Black women well known in the US Civil Rights community is so unimpressive to you that you cannot wait for the full text of a page being created in real time to be finished?

1555:

before making comments about other editors. Your comment about bias is not only unfounded, it is not appreciated and is contrary to the Knowledge community guidelines. If you feel I am bias, feel free to report me to the Admin board.

701:

at all. Care must be taken with article structure to ensure the overall presentation and section headings are broadly neutral. Beware of claims that rely on guilt by association, and biased, malicious or overly promotional content.

2500:

This page was an abandoned draft that has now been declined or rejected as duplicating an existing article. Any details in this draft that are not in the article may be added to the article. This draft should be allowed to be

2725:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 113:

Biased Editing is Unbalancing My Entry with Criticism...Again. Meanwhile, cited material about my work in reputable publications is being deleted and being replaced with syntheses of critical comments from a handful of my

240:. But I poked around and see there are several articles on "XXXX and Violence" so I think keep it. I currently am on a deadline for a writing assignment, but I can add more material and more cites to other sources soon. 486:. I've templated the recent edit warriors. You can template any further edit warriors by putting {{subst:Ds/alert|blp}} on the talk page. If the introduction of bias resumes by notified editors, you can then go to 2411: 2418:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2294:

1453:

4718: 944:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4301: 3709:? I am not entirely sure what it is and cannot seem to find anything about it on Google. It might very well be not notable, but if you have source, whether it be online or offline, please do so. Thanks. ~ 3230: 2906: 2352: 1102: 1029: 2449:. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Knowledge should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — 4622: 563:

I was at least trying to focus on the content, by reminding all contributors that the content is subject to special scrutiny. Are you, Collect, also focusing on the content, or on the contributors?

4285:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3214:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2890:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2336:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1086:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1013:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 767:

is a bound report. ISBN numbers are issued for bound books and reports. ISSN numbers are issued for serials, even if sporadic. The distinction is important if confusing. I have two books in print:

165:

and a sysop will investigate the violation. There are four steps, per the guidelines, in regards to content disputes where things like bias and use of unsuitable references are addressed. They are

749:

So I'm wondering which of these you don't think you are either the writer or that isn't a book. The 1995 book lists you as an editor. The 1987 has an article. It suggest that it is a report.

45: 424:

I think the entry is much improved, and I sincerely appreciate the efforts to make it better and more NPOV. I am awaiting interlibrary loan for some books with scholars with criticisms.

721:

You did if I recall claim to have written only 2 books. Your Biblio and article have 3 listed. Your biblio lists *(1987) Clouds Blur the Rainbow: The Other Side of New Alliance Party,

4271: 3200: 2876: 2594: 2108:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you

1541: 1292: 1834:

I think what triggered suspicions was that a new user appeared out of nowhere to support a point you made on an obscure Knowledge talk page. Do you know who this other person (

4445: 3933: 3507: 320:

and that there was a specific consensus against inclusion -- although, as I read it, as a journalist you recognize that opinions cited as opinions are of value to readers.

2592:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 2287: 25:

Meanwhile, cited material about my work in reputable publications is being deleted and being replaced with syntheses of critical comments from a handful of my critics.

1446: 4458: 3942: 3856:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

3516: 3145:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

2832:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

1637: 513:

is not in any way a BLP violation, and your gratuitous templating is not only unwelcome, it is far afield from the ArbCom decisions about BLPs. I suggest you read

4463:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

3947:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

3521:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2507:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2582: 1817:

I've unblocked you per the discussion below. The backdrop of events is a bit Byzantine, but I believe you deserve the benefit of the doubt. Good luck to you.

198:

OK, thanks for clarifying this. Alas, another rime consuming interaction with the one thing Wilipedia can't seem to deal with: Wikistalking and Wikifanatics.

4502: 3986: 3560: 1998:...but this is hardly creating sock puppets. I have done it before for Knowledge pages that needed work and have never been accused of creating sockpuppets. 4726:

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit

1880:, not sock puppetry. Beyond that, I'm not really sure what to say. Maybe you might ask Bbb23 if he'd unblock you if you agreed to stay away from the AfD? 323:

shows him apparently trying to make a cause celebre out of what is, to me, a farily routine edit. He also posted some strong language on my user talk page

4106:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for 4050:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for 3829:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 3118:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 2805:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 4706: 2400: 2276: 2117: 1435: 3390: 2986: 2113: 1737: 4702: 2083: 521:

a "contentious claim about a person" to note that a notable person criticized them. Also note that calling me an "edit warrior" is an abuse of

3393:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

2989:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

4495: 4432: 3979: 3920: 3553: 3494: 3394: 3386: 3346: 2990: 2982: 2942: 2722: 2682: 2159: 2035: 1787:

was moving forward. I have no motive, and would not risk my credentials by doing something so nonsensical.Thanks for considering this request.

1379: 4212: 675:

I have been admonished for rhetorical excess and have been trying to take a calmer stance. I think the point I take away from the comments by

4633: 4477:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

3961:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

3535:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

2521:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

2442: 735:, Political Research Associates (1995) editor of Eyes Right! Challenging the Right Wing Backlash, South End Press, Boston; paperback edition 732: 2024:

I think this explains pretty clearly what happened here. It's not a Knowledge crime to ask for this sort of help. I am inclined to unblock.

4324: 3252: 2928: 2366: 1116: 1043: 969: 4698: 4683: 1667: 316:

I rather thought the Wilcox claims properly stated as opinion would be no problem. One editor,alas, feels that the material violates

3417:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 3013:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 2749:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 2645: 2623: 1220: 1212: 3682:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 3309:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 1918: 1732: 1255:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 1171:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 746: 739: 725: 4614: 4602: 4573:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4478: 4471: 4399: 4350:

for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

4175:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

3825:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

3114:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2801:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2651:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

742:(2000) with Matthew N. Lyons, Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort, Guilford Press, New York; paperback edition 218: 4414: 4395: 4320: 3902: 3883: 3476: 3457: 3248: 2924: 2487: 2468: 2362: 1912: 1383: 1112: 1039: 965: 237: 2492:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Knowledge. You can find it and improve it at

2116:. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see 1985:===The entry for the heroic human rights activist Kapya John Kaoma has been listed for deletion because he lacks "notability." 4454: 4438: 3938: 3926: 3716: 3693: 3512: 3500: 3025: 2079: 178: 149: 4211:, did you mean a different page number or source? Yes, the author helped edit that book, but the cited content comes from 4522: 4450: 4006: 3765: 3580: 2655:, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at 2558: 3819: 3797: 260:

with sections on Left Wing and Right Wing, and references to the existing pages on religious violence and also terrorism.

4373: 4294: 3366: 3223: 2962: 2899: 2702: 2671: 2604:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 2345: 2231: 2177: 2163: 2055: 1095: 1022: 956:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4727: 4306: 3686:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~

3235: 2911: 2730: 2357: 1663: 1371: 1329: 1307: 1107: 1034: 961: 3313:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

1259:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

3872: 3414: 3010: 2746: 2236: 2149: 2141: 1885: 1859: 1845: 1375: 275: 543:

Cheers, perhaps you could compare your response posted here above in terms of tone to the comment posted above by

4710: 3071: 2609: 2568: 2490:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

2404: 2280: 2101: 1751: 1655: 1623: 1439: 825: 798: 754: 627: 568: 495: 464: 414: 4617:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months 2084:

http://www.academia.edu/26640115/Heroes_Know_Which_Villains_to_Kill_How_Coded_Rhetoric_Incites_Scripted_Violence

1988:

So a world-famous Black Christian minister born in Zambia who fights against bigotry and murder of LGBTQ+ people

3962: 3955: 3887: 3742: 3536: 3529: 3461: 3373: 2969: 2709: 2199: 2062: 1709: 440:

Just saw the comments on the Sandbox page. Sorry for being clueless, I will remember to check it for specifics.

3108: 3086: 3061: 4567: 4545: 4047: 4035: 3738: 3479:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

3274: 3266: 592:

do I care what the exact material is as long as it complies with Knowledge policies and guidelines. Cheers.

3734: 3442: 3332: 2795: 2773: 2522: 2515: 2472: 1646: 1641: 1633: 1198: 1136: 1128: 881:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

4169: 4147: 4103: 4091: 3937:

of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see

3647: 3639: 3511:

of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see

529:. Further that your acts here are, IMHO, not indicative of collegial editing of an encyclopedia. Cheers. 4461:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge.

4417:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

4384: 4365: 3945:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge.

3905:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

3519:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge.

2443:

https://ahmadsamantho.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/culture-religion-apocalypse-and-middle-east-foreign-policy/

2198:

disambiguates only one extant Knowledge page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a

1659: 1223:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 1139:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 4347: 1906: 1531: 1523: 1515: 1507: 1499: 1491: 1483: 1475: 4577:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can 4282: 4179:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can 3776:

remember the days of the telephone-based BBS systems. Mine was called AMNET. :-) See "BBS The Movie"

3616:

My use of the name "Chip Berlet" is not designed in any way to be an attempt at disguising my identity.

3590: 3211: 3049: 3005: 2978: 2946: 2887: 2435: 2333: 2145: 1881: 1855: 1841: 1358: 1083: 1010: 257: 4494:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

3978:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

3552:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

3409: 3382: 3350: 2271: 2255: 2136: 2071: 2039: 4124:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

4068:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

4644: 4420: 4180: 4136: 4125: 4080: 4069: 3908: 3857: 3706: 3675: 3482: 3398: 3302: 3146: 3066: 2994: 2833: 2659:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — 2656: 2605: 2564: 2424: 2395: 2379: 2121: 1264: 1248: 1164: 914: 821: 794: 750: 676: 623: 564: 544: 491: 460: 410: 344:

might make him understand that no journalist wishes to have a totally bowdlerized article. Cheers.

4737: 4672: 4574: 4238: 4220: 4176: 4107: 4051: 3826: 3115: 2802: 2652: 2446: 2125: 1572: 1467: 1403: 1387: 957: 283: 226: 4581:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4183:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 3860:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 3149:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 2836:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4533: 4023: 3427: 3317: 3030: 2600: 2296: 1183: 895:(2000). ''The ideology of the extreme right.'' Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 12-13 870: 116:". Now let's look at the tasks in which a sysop can perform. They are as follows as outlined at 4578: 1559:

I suggest you focus on the AfD and proving the adequacy of the article references and support.

4453:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 4380: 4265: 3761: 3194: 2870: 2598:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 2457: 2320: 1552: 1354: 1070: 997: 979: 933: 924: 743: 736: 729: 722: 661: 597: 534: 390: 349: 4491:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 3975:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 3549:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 2535:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 4659: 4626: 4563: 4353:

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can

4313: 4278: 4165: 4118: 4062: 3815: 3782: 3746: 3586: 3242: 3207: 3164: 3104: 2918: 2883: 2844: 2791: 2665: 2641: 2529: 2329: 2220: 2185: 1999: 1947: 1863: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1715: 1673: 1662:. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 1599: 1585: 1582: 1430: 1414: 1325: 1311: 1079: 1006: 953: 937: 836: 776: 708: 680: 548: 441: 425: 363: 293: 261: 241: 199: 94: 60: 4293:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3222:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2898:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2344:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1094:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1021:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 952:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 385:

criticism of Wilcox! That is what is sourced to the "Washington Times" AFAICT. Cheers.

4640: 4132: 4076: 3153: 2420: 1928: 1822: 1683: 1296: 1288: 1275: 1260: 910: 906: 861: 479: 117: 48:

has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the

4117:. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request 4061:. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request 2985:, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not 4732: 4668: 4485: 4290: 4234: 4216: 3969: 3868: 3543: 3219: 2895: 2726: 2341: 2244: 1901: 1877: 1560: 1527: 1519: 1511: 1503: 1495: 1487: 1479: 1471: 1455: 1391: 1091: 1018: 949: 941: 619: 337: 279: 222: 191: 81: 4618: 4559: 4528: 4286: 4161: 4114: 4058: 4014: 3811: 3750: 3710: 3687: 3683: 3310: 3215: 3100: 3045: 3020: 2891: 2787: 2762: 2741: 2718: 2686: 2637: 2502: 2337: 2216: 2181: 2075: 2025: 1966: 1548: 1341: 1256: 1176: 1172: 1087: 1014: 945: 611: 581: 526: 522: 514: 483: 333: 317: 174: 170: 162: 656:

to note some examples of material I find to be real problems on Knowledge. Cheers.

3754: 3661: 3655: 3651: 3288: 3282: 3278: 2450: 1234: 1228: 1224: 1150: 1144: 1140: 816: 657: 593: 530: 487: 386: 345: 166: 136:

to move a page to any desired title (this is in part a consequence of the last two)

4257: 3389:, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not 3186: 2862: 2721:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 2581: 2311: 1061: 988: 3619:

I believe the blocking editor acted in haste and failed to do any due diligence.

54:

template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

4113:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

4057:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

3671: 3667: 3413:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3385:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

3298: 3294: 3009:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2981:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

2840: 2745:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2660: 2493: 2235:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2180:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

2140:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2074:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

1340:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

1244: 1240: 1160: 1156: 615: 381:. The interesting bit is that your defenders seem to think the problem is with 221:. Do you think you can help expand it? Or should it be merged somewhere else? 29: 4407: 3895: 3650:, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 3469: 3277:, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 2480: 2098:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 905:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

1924: 1818: 1679: 3060:

Hello Chip.berlet -- I've moved it to draftspace for you to work on further:

3864: 2240: 186: 76: 3749:

on Knowledge - you can continue to edit them there and then submit them to

4741: 4676: 4666:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Z_Communications&action=history

4648: 4613:

Hello, Chip.berlet. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that

4595: 4558: