511:
houses, commercial premises) then it is easy to deal with every building in individual sentences or paragraphs under appropriate section headings. But if you have no intention of describing every single building by a prolific architect, then a list toward the bottom of the article is the most practical solution. It is also something that other contributors will be pleased to add to, if they have info to hand. A list of less than ten works is probably not worth doing as you can alway include them by writing a sentence:
594:. Few individual architects and only a small minority of buildings are in the "High" priority category. I am saying this because some (undoubtedly well-intentioned) person inserted every single modern American architect into the "Top" priority listing. I removed most of them.....anyway, I'm getting ahead of myself, because you need to write the articles first...
483:. You can create any number of userspace pages using that format, and drafting it helps to keep it from being deleted if you haven't made notability clear from the beginning. I can help you with reference formatting as well, since it's rather difficult, and WP's user interface is somewhat less than easy to learn.
528:
You will find that there are Wiki-purists who are dedicated law-enforcers. This can sometimes make life very difficult. Read the
Manuscript of style, which you can access from the left hand column help file. But someone politer than me will probably drop round and leave you details of the pages and
569:
Pictures: It is generally preferred (and sometime rigorously enforced) to have most pics as "thumbnail" size. i.e. you don't state a size in pix. Vertical picture often have the word "upright" which means they are quite small. On the other hand, your introductory pic can be big, so save it for a
510:
I take a pragmatic approach. In practice, I am in favour of lists within articles, if a list really is the best way of conveying information. For example, if an architect designed only six buildings in two decades, or 10 buildings in three cities, or eight buildings in several categories (churches,
554:
Don't ever bother using the words "beautiful" or any such. They are regarded as "Peacock terms" and not encyclopaedic. You can get away with adjectives such as "precise", "detailed", "decorative", "robust", and even "brutal" but not "magnificent"........ although I put up a good case for it over
577:
Articles are generally quality assessed sooner or later. A decision is also made by somebody (it can be the author of the article) as to the relative importance of the particular article to the subject as a whole. If you are the person who does this, be aware that individual architects and
478:
I've replied to your question at my talkpage. Go ahead and dive in. If you're working on something that will require some time to get into shape, you can draft the article in userspace and copy it into article space when it's ready, for example at
40:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
62:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about
Knowledge, you might want to consider being "
521:. Then it is possible to introduce a picture for every work, if one is available, and you'll find other contributors who really enjoy contributing missing pics. See
566:
and link to other Wiki articles. Also, go round the traps and form links within existent articles to the one that you have written, so that it isn't an "orphan".
176:
570:
building rather than the portrait of the architect. There is a neat way of inserting several pics in a row, but you have to fiddle with the sizes. See
513:"Other bridges by Bloggs include the those over the Bogong River at Bong Bong, over Jerry's Creek at Piddledee, and over the Tarry Inlet at Tillydale."
220:
71:
161:
198:
540:
cite it as an architect's "most famous" work, then back it up with a reference, even if what you are saying is as ridiculously obvious as
59:
37:
522:
455:
58:
518:
407:
216:
194:
271:
211:
371:
321:
384:
339:
325:
128:
447:
308:
403:
299:
249:
245:
138:
267:
228:
551:
If you say something is "unique", then the sentence must indicate that it is indeed "one of a kind" in some way.
480:
583:
429:
425:
254:
207:
571:
347:
236:
203:
578:
individual buildings don't normally rate "Top" priority. That is reserved mainly for generic articles like
646:
334:
303:
232:
120:
63:
31:
442:
393:
389:
380:
376:
67:
49:
556:
541:
492:
438:
275:
241:
87:
53:
634:
330:
316:
262:
167:
619:
605:
579:
312:
171:
124:
642:
399:
366:
75:
74:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
486:
451:
81:
433:
258:
70:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
638:
615:
601:
343:
156:
545:
517:
If an architect is very prolific, then it is worth creating a separate page called
134:
650:
623:
609:
591:
500:
95:
614:
Oh I notice a proper welcom has been added while I've been writing this!
587:
525:. Not architecture, but it gives an idea of what can be done.
286:
107:
24:
529:
info you most need. (I have to look them up all the time).
536:
Don't ever bother saying something is "famous", and if you
641:before you edit any related articles. Thank you.
78:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
598:Have fun! Drop me a message if you need help.
562:Form links in the text, create a section called
52:and ask your question there. Please remember to
8:
66:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
519:List of architectural works by John Bloggs
637:or an affiliated company, please follow
586:, for the odd few who are up there with
633:If you are affliated with or represent
7:
590:and buildings as significant as the
523:List of works by Leonardo da Vinci
14:
57:
20:
177:Request administrator attention
1:
651:03:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
221:Biographies of living persons
121:The five pillars of Knowledge
103:
246:Policy for non-free content
162:New contributors' help page
666:
481:User:DavidSycamore/sandbox
157:Frequently Asked Questions
56:on talk pages by clicking
624:17:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
610:17:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
584:Renaissance architecture
501:16:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
96:16:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
572:Romanesque architecture
372:Help develop an article
186:Policies and Guidelines
29:Hello, DavidSycamore!
217:What Knowledge is not
195:Neutral point of view
394:Translating articles
304:Adopt-a-user program
272:Conflict of interest
212:No original research
557:St Peter's Basilica
542:St Paul's Cathedral
532:What I can say is:
322:No personal attacks
580:Roman architecture
390:Join a WikiProject
385:Requested articles
367:Be bold in editing
326:Resolving disputes
129:Your first article
38:your contributions
497:
471:
470:
467:
466:
463:
462:
309:Assume good faith
283:
282:
233:Three-revert rule
102:
101:
92:
657:
498:
495:
491:
489:
448:Useful templates
300:Community Portal
287:
250:Image use policy
199:Reliable sources
108:
104:
93:
90:
86:
84:
61:
46:
45:
25:
21:
665:
664:
660:
659:
658:
656:
655:
654:
631:
508:
493:
487:
485:
476:
418:
358:
331:Build consensus
292:
268:Deletion policy
229:Manual of Style
187:
149:
139:upload an image
113:
112:Getting Started
98:
88:
82:
80:
43:
42:
19:
12:
11:
5:
663:
661:
630:
627:
596:
595:
575:
567:
560:
552:
549:
507:
504:
475:
472:
469:
468:
465:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
445:
436:
420:
419:
416:
413:
412:
411:
410:
396:
387:
374:
360:
359:
356:
353:
352:
351:
350:
337:
328:
319:
306:
294:
293:
290:
284:
281:
280:
279:
278:
265:
255:External links
252:
239:
225:
224:
223:
214:
208:Citing sources
201:
189:
188:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
174:
164:
159:
151:
150:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
131:
115:
114:
111:
100:
99:
54:sign your name
36:Thank you for
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
662:
653:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
635:Pradeep Dadha
629:Pradeep Dadha
628:
626:
625:
621:
617:
612:
611:
607:
603:
599:
593:
589:
585:
581:
576:
573:
568:
565:
561:
558:
553:
550:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:
533:
530:
526:
524:
520:
515:
514:
505:
503:
502:
499:
496:
490:
482:
473:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
437:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:Miscellaneous
415:
414:
409:
405:
401:
398:Cleaning up:
397:
395:
391:
388:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
368:
364:
363:
362:
361:
355:
354:
349:
348:Mailing lists
345:
341:
338:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:The Community
289:
288:
285:
277:
273:
269:
266:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
237:Sock puppetry
234:
230:
227:
226:
222:
218:
215:
213:
209:
205:
204:Verifiability
202:
200:
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
184:
183:
178:
175:
173:
172:make requests
169:
168:ask questions
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
154:
153:
152:
146:
145:
140:
136:
132:
130:
126:
122:
119:
118:
117:
116:
110:
109:
106:
105:
97:
94:
91:
85:
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
39:
35:
34:to Knowledge!
33:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
643:Novaseminary
632:
613:
600:
597:
563:
546:Eiffel Tower
537:
531:
527:
516:
512:
509:
484:
477:
456:User scripts
430:Disambiguity
365:
357:Things to do
344:IRC channels
335:Village pump
148:Getting Help
79:
76:edit summary
41:
30:
564:Other pages
381:Peer review
377:Maintenance
135:edit a page
68:WikiProject
488:Acroterion
474:Architects
443:Talk pages
439:User pages
426:Categories
276:Notability
242:Copyrights
166:Where to:
83:Acroterion
44:{{helpme}}
592:Taj Mahal
408:Vandalism
317:Etiquette
263:Vandalism
50:talk page
616:Amandajm
602:Amandajm
588:Palladio
340:Signpost
313:Civility
133:How to:
125:Tutorial
48:on your
544:or the
400:General
64:adopted
32:Welcome
17:Welcome
639:WP:COI
494:(talk)
89:(talk)
506:Lists
452:Tools
434:Stubs
647:talk
620:talk
606:talk
538:must
404:Spam
259:Spam
72:here
649:)
622:)
608:)
582:,
454:•
450:•
441:•
432:•
428:•
406:•
402:•
392:•
383:•
379:•
370:•
346:•
342:•
333:•
324:•
315:•
311:•
302:•
274:•
270:•
261:•
257:•
248:•
244:•
235:•
231:•
219:•
210:•
206:•
197:•
170:•
137:•
127:•
123:•
645:(
618:(
604:(
574:.
559:.
548:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
