379:
90:", and edited it to begin addressing the concerns in the deletion flag. I tried to fix it with major edits and additional citations and examples illustrating the broad-concept and links to instances of it and... you guessed it. Deleted anyway! (The flag was disambiguation/broad concept - the two votes subsequent were TNT -, neither addressed my four new paragraphs to fix the three sentence stub, as usual in AfDs).
180:
520:
435:
475:
rewriting--See my comments at the talk page of the article. I could rewrite it myself, but it's your responsibility, especially since it needs so much rewriting and additional factual information. If it seems he's notable , I will delete the sandbox page--we don't keep drat versions when we have an article.
225:
I went and read up on the naming policy after your comment. Also, I had never heard of deletionpedia.com, so thanks for introducing me to that. I certainly support what their general philosophy. I'm not an inclusionist per se, but I am very anti-deletionist (not speedys and such, but the stuff I see
474:
You seem to have moved it yourself, which is not a good idea. . I cannot tell from the current state of the article whether he is notable: Distinguished
Professor usually is, but it is not clear whether he received thet itle only upon his retirement. Since WP does not publish CVs, it needs complete
327:
is probably the best argument. If I was a disruptive troll that wanted to troll myself, I'd use this one. You could say I was an advertisement for some delete-archiving website like the one you told me about, or any inclusionsist organizations named delete and/or pedia. There is a New York Times
303:
is the on you mention, but flat out my name does nothing to imply another human is using this account, like the example "jackandjill" does, orthe one reprted today to WP:UAA, Sharedaccounts123. Obviously my name doesn't imply an office or a position held within an organization, like
337:
I'm curious if you are persuaded or not, or have any other concerns. Does that sound like a correct application of the policy to my username? I like my name and I don't want to change it, so I'd be psyched if I was able to convince you that I was no in violation. Or at least wasn't
163:
Although this is a new account, I see that you have some previous experience under a different username. Having two accounts is allowed, but if you're going to actively edit with both accounts, you'll want to be sure that you don't stray into forbidden sock-puppet territory.
315:". Only one even has -pedia in it, they al have wiki, but it clearly doesn't even ban all wiki names. It's wrried about stuff like "WikimediaCopyrightStaff", "WikipediaPolicyEnforecmentAdmin", "WikimediaFoundationFundraisingInitiative" or other such nonsense. Cleary not me.
159:
It's close enough that searching for "Deleteopedia" on Google brings up that website. The form of the name can also imply shared use, since the -pedia suffix is now commonly associated with wiki- (and some non-wiki-) based websites.
78:, just looked at the page and voted (ex., no reliable sources, an editor posts a bunch in the discussion, then right below it a bunch of people vote delete - "I couldn't find any sources anywhere).
87:
328:
article called "Deletopedia" so maybe I'm advertising the NYT... Obviously, I'm not violating this; never done any promotion behaviors, zero COI, but there could be an accusation.
226:
in AfDs is outrageous). I'm glad to see a website devoted to doing their part to combat
Knowledge (XXG) eating itself due to the constant stream of WP guideline ignoring,
42:
hypothesize that the cause (or one of the causes) is simply that the people who visit and vote on AfD pages most regularly are people who have an interest in deletion
478:
Rescuing deleted articles is a good thing to do--I became an admin, in fact, in order to do just tthat. But they usually need considerable work done to them.
45:
532:
543:
66:, the ultimate "I don't want to defend any rationale for this vote" vote, purely subjective and most often an end-run around the real issue; e.g.,
396:
321:
lol vague, subjective, doesn't even articulate any clear standard. Sounds
Familiar! This is literally the WP:TNT of the naming policy haha! Next.
313:
including phrases such as "wikipedia", "wikimedia", "wiktionary"...give the incorrect impression that the account may be officially affiliated...
252:
Regarding your concern about my old account: I think you may have skimmed over my personal info and missed where I said why I changed. It was
63:
441:
426:
20:
71:
58:(ex. editors that just ignore subject specific notability guidelines because they don't personally like them), or that
297:". That being said, here are my thoughts why its actually pretty clearly not a violation, as I read the policies:
527:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
360:
It seems like you're heavily invested in this name and I'm not going to dissuade you from continuing to use it.
242:
524:
512:
308:
67:
324:
211:
Thanks for being the first person to comment on my talk! Also, thanks for bringing this to my attention.
269:
253:
554:
283:
105:
536:
318:
456:
38:
once an article is flagged for deletion, it is far to easy for a worthwhile page to be deleted.
346:
99:
385:
378:
184:
528:
422:
300:
227:
550:
153:
While yours is not exactly the same name, it's very similar to the name of a website:
501:
485:
447:
440:
I've left a comment on your
Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
494:
At the very least, please mark the draft for deletion, use {{db-self}} at the top.
18:============================ PERSONAL INFO =======================================
405:
362:
205:
192:
166:
558:
523:
Hello, Deleteopedia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
505:
489:
461:
411:
392:
368:
354:
198:
172:
496:
480:
519:
311:
is obviously ot applicable, but one standard i worth mentioning: Names "
230:
bomb throwing deletionists that make AfDs look like legal vandalism.
434:
32:
I formed while learning
Knowledge (XXG) on my 1st account, which is
403:
I failed to notice this was on my own talk page rather than yours.
83:
On this account I have ventured into editing my first actual page
56:
votes that specify a rationale in conflict with the guidelines
154:
29:
I chose the name "deleteopedia" is in reference to an opinion
433:
399:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
377:
19:
531:, so if you wish to retain the page, please
256:so I won't be using that account anymore.
263:
236:
213:
133:
96:PLEASE DON"T EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE. THANKS!
279:The most important take away for me was:
470:I see this is also in WP as an article
7:
539:that it be moved to your userspace.
546:so you can continue working on it.
345:Please let me know what you think.
442:User:Deleteopedia/SandboxHoneycutt
427:User:Deleteopedia/SandboxHoneycutt
106:Find Userspace Pages (PrefixIndex)
14:
518:
178:
150:Username may be against policy
445:
52:formed this hypothesis based on
1:
559:01:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
412:22:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
393:22:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
369:18:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
355:17:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
199:18:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
173:15:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
574:
506:20:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
176:
155:https://deletionpedia.org/
490:05:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
462:08:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
340:unambiguously problematic
295:unambiguously problematic
525:Draft:James M. Honeycutt
513:Draft:James M. Honeycutt
374:New message from Jmcgnh
544:request it be undeleted
438:
382:
437:
381:
94:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
103:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
138:Username Discussion
511:Concern regarding
439:
397:remove this notice
386:Jmcgnh's talk page
383:
74:, etc.)., or that
429:has a new comment
418:
417:
334:
333:
261:
260:
235:
234:
565:
522:
460:
453:
450:
408:
400:
365:
264:
241:A quick note on
237:
214:
201:
195:
185:User talk:jmcgnh
182:
181:
169:
134:
88:Threshold Effect
17:
573:
572:
568:
567:
566:
564:
563:
562:
516:
472:
464:
451:
448:
431:
419:
406:
401:
390:
363:
335:
273:
257:
246:
243:WP:SOCKPUPPETRY
231:
219:
202:
193:
189:
187:
179:
167:
151:
139:
126:
124:New Section Two
116:
114:New Section One
12:
11:
5:
571:
569:
529:may be deleted
515:
509:
471:
468:
466:
432:
430:
425:notification:
420:
416:
415:
391:Message added
389:
376:
372:
371:
332:
331:
330:
329:
322:
316:
309:WP:MISLEADNAME
305:
298:
275:
274:
268:After reading
267:
262:
259:
258:
251:
248:
247:
240:
233:
232:
224:
221:
220:
217:
177:
149:
146:
145:
141:
140:
137:
132:
130:
129:
128:
125:
122:
120:
119:
118:
115:
112:
110:
16:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
570:
561:
560:
556:
552:
547:
545:
540:
538:
534:
530:
526:
521:
514:
510:
508:
507:
503:
499:
498:
492:
491:
487:
483:
482:
476:
469:
467:
463:
459:
458:
455:
454:
443:
436:
428:
424:
421:
414:
413:
410:
409:
398:
394:
387:
380:
375:
370:
367:
366:
359:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
343:
341:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
296:
292:
290:
285:
282:
281:
280:
277:
276:
271:
266:
265:
255:
250:
249:
244:
239:
238:
229:
223:
222:
216:
215:
212:
209:
207:
200:
197:
196:
186:
175:
174:
171:
170:
161:
157:
156:
148:
147:
143:
142:
136:
135:
131:
123:
121:
113:
111:
108:
107:
104:
101:
98:
97:
91:
89:
85:
84:
79:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
47:
41:
39:
36:
31:
30:
25:
24:
22:
548:
541:
517:
495:
493:
479:
477:
473:
465:
457:
446:
404:
402:
373:
361:
350:
347:Deleteopedia
344:
339:
336:
325:WP:PROMONAME
312:
294:
288:
286:
278:
210:
203:
191:
165:
162:
158:
152:
127:
117:
109:
102:
100:Deleteopedia
95:
93:
92:
82:
81:
80:
75:
59:
55:
51:
46:deletionists
43:
37:
34:
33:
28:
27:
26:
270:WP:USERNAME
254:WP:REALNAME
206:user:jmcgnh
183:Moved from
551:FireflyBot
444:. Thanks!
395:. You can
284:WP:BADNAME
68:notability
535:again or
319:WP:UNCONF
407:— jmcgnh
364:— jmcgnh
307:most of
194:— jmcgnh
168:— jmcgnh
537:request
533:edit it
301:WP:ISU
228:WP:TNT
23:pages.
502:talk
486:talk
62:(ex.
50:). I
555:talk
452:Tony
351:talk
35:that
497:DGG
481:DGG
449:Ken
423:AfC
342:".
204:Hi
72:COI
64:TNT
21:AfD
557:)
504:)
488:)
353:)
208:,
188:–
144:2
70:.
44:("
553:(
500:(
484:(
388:.
349:(
338:"
291:"
287:"
245::
48:"
40:I
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
