1139:, and I'd want to apologize for being unclear in the message you quoted. In case you felt I somehow changed my mind in the message you quoted, it was truly a matter of miscommunication. In many ways, I agree that Knowledge (XXG) is a joke too with its wolf-packs and unqualified administrators and mediators. I have been subjected to ridiculous treatments by WP authorities as well, but then you should keep in mind that this is just an online website and not life/work. As a result, you should take a step back and not try to pretend this is some serious place that is run with perfect professionalism. However, in your case, you were pretty much caught red-handed for breaking policies (which are in fact subjected to change by anyone, including Mr. Smith's 12 year old crack-smoking grand-nephew). If you want to rumble in Knowledge (XXG), you'd have to know how to wiki-lawyer or you'd be hounded relentlessly by wiki-lawyers.
680:, which is the noticeboard for biographies of living people. I'd be happy to help you set up a discussion there. I know this may sound odd or self-serving, but, really, I just want to do what is best for the encyclopedia, and I know that when you first start editing Knowledge (XXG), we have all of these policies and guidelines that don't match how anything else works on the internet (or really, in general), and so it's tough to learn how we decide what does and doesn't go into articles. I'm happy to help; you're also welcome to ignore that and ask others or work your way through the process on your own in case you prefer that.
743:
1163:
496:
1095:
922:. On the other hand, I don't think it is very professional for Qwyrxian to go after Diligent007 personally. He should've informed a 3rd party and let the 3rd party deal with it. Even if he is poised to win this administrator nomination regardless of any circumstances, I consider his action to be damaging to his image as a candidate. --
1277:
So, we can refer to the warnings posted there, if (when) future problems are raised. However, as you might know, it has been extremely difficult to "undo" an admin approval, where many people are trying to "be polite" and only mention problems in such vague ways, where most people cannot be dissuaded
1253:
Wow, I regret that you were blocked so quickly, because I wanted to know more about the key disputes which had occurred, without reading all the prior diff-link pages. First, thank you for taking the time to alert so many users, who also came and warned the rest of us, so more people were able to see
1048:
I meant to delete that part before posting on
Knowledge (XXG). I was just playing around on Google translation to see how it would look, and did not remove that last part when copying and pasting--it's my first time using that system (and had I known to read the Japanese lettering afterwards, I would
671:
Now that Master of
Puppets has chosen not to block you (which is fine--all that matters is that you don't keep edit warring), let's continue the discussion on the article talk page. So far, three different editors have said that the fact doesn't belong, so you've got a hard road to convince us that
1282:
changed to 1-year renewable terms (requiring a 75%-support re-vote to re-instate an admin), because it was so difficult to remove troublesome admins. Prior conflicts had led to ongoing resentments. Now, Swedish WP still has emergency removal of extreme admins, but 4 times per year (4 quarters), they
710:
You might want to consider editing some non-controversial articles for a time, as an easier way of learning about how
Knowledge (XXG) works. It can be quite daunting learning all of the policies here, and learning how to work with others ("consensus"). That process is much easier with articles where
702:
indicates that you don't fully understand the edit-warring policy. Please read the links above - even if you didn't use the 'undo' button, you still reverted five times in a short period. You normally would have been blocked for that. Even if you had slightly changed the wording to reinsert the same
1026:
as well. You were attempting to influence the outcome of the RFA discussion by notifying specific people who you thought would oppose the RFA, and this type of behaviour is considered disruptive, and is not permitted under the canvassing rule. A copy of this message appears on
Qwyrxian's talk page.
890:
Forbidden is probably too strong language, but I want to say that when it comes to the general principle
Qwyrxian is correct. I opposed his adminship, but it's a bad idea to canvass for support for a particular point of view in a discussion. If you think a certain course of action is the right one,
1285:
Many of us fear people from formerly "fascist" cultures who gain power and think they no longer need little-people consensus to do what they always wanted but were afraid to say honestly. The most dangerous seem to be the people who are most charming and most polite, like the old
Japanese adage,
955:
And because you were not invited, the process of nominating him would have been incomplete (and, in a way, tainted), and so my having informed you was a good thing, regardless of your prior dealings with him--I want to see what your impression of him was as to his nomination.
1072:
If you carry on with this highly disruptive behaviour, you'll be blocked from editing. In the meantime, owing to the disruption you've stirred up, I'm banning you from making further edits to Q's RfA discussion space. If you wish to appeal this, you may do so at ANI.
1283:
re-elect from among their roughly 98 admins, while allowing new admins each week. Because the re-elections occur each quarter, then "every Swede" knows when to vote, to avoid someone sneaking through because people did not know about the re-RfA election.
1116:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
864:, you may not go to the talk pages of people who you believe share an opinion about you to solicit comments on a process like RfA. If other editors want to give their opinion, they may do so, but specficially recruiting others is forbidden.
579:
I was just coming here to leave the same message. Since you were adequately warned, you're last revert was after that warning, and you're actually up to 5 reverts in the past 24 hours, I'm going to report you to
1254:
the wide extent of fears in the WP community. I wish the RfA could have been extended, so then perhaps, more people could have changed their !votes based on the new concerns being raised. I always worry,
1290:. Anyway, please know that your cautions have been heard, and many people have echoed your concerns, so you will return to an environment with eyes wide open. Thanks again for alerting the rest of us. -
1262:
without, at least, 2 sides in the war, where perhaps one side is merely "under siege" from the other. Above all, please do not feel frustrated, your views and others' concerns have been noted in:
818:
Just a minor note; I don't mind if you think I was out of line on the article, but I didn't call the admin a bad name; if you look back in at the archives for the 3RR report, which you can see at
30:
819:
1022:
Writing "Go fuck yourself" in
Japanese on Qwyrxian's talk page is unacceptable behaviour, Diligent007. You could be blocked for that type of behavior. Please read the material at
584:. You will likely be blocked. After your block, please come back to the article's talk page and discuss it there--you cannot just attempt to get your way by constant reverts.
936:
By the way, I feel offended that he (Diligent007) didn't invite me. I am a pretty harsh critic of
Qwyrxian as well. In fact, I've just admonished Qwyrxian in some recent posts
1230:
168:
826:. That is, the user's actual username is "Master of Puppets", just as yours is Diligent007. Also, note that you are welcome to continue discussing the issue on
796:
Actually, you can't add comments yet--the RfA hasn't been transcluded (opened). Until such time as I or my nominator transcludes it (it will then show up on
1268:
222:
132:
1068:
because you posted to a skewed sample of editors, which is to say, editors you thought likely to be against that RfA. The policy is straightforward,
209:
387:
756:
1203:
218:
1070:...canvassing which is done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way is considered inappropriate.
707:
to 3 reverts every 24 hours. You could be blocked the next time you add that information back against consensus, simply for edit-warring.
643:. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~
1112:
781:
822:, and look at the very last comment there, it's signed by "m.o.p.", which, if you click on the link, will see that it was written by
450:
196:
348:
34:
838:, but we could be wrong. I'd also be happy to point you to the relevant noticeboards if you want to get more uninvolved opinions.
538:
277:
200:
1113:
64:
383:
378:
327:
609:
550:
511:
309:
268:
127:
1187:
554:
464:
314:
527:
Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
446:
409:
339:
331:
251:
247:
230:
820:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive163#User:Diligent007 reported by User:Qwyrxian (Result: Mediating)
1170:
560:
273:
67:
if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
400:
396:
256:
213:
136:
918:
Diligent007 does appear to be canvassing, given the nature of the posts he left on other people's talk pages, i.e.
356:
238:
205:
1183:
627:
546:
519:
503:
472:
343:
234:
113:
109:
999:
459:
455:
405:
1207:
1179:
1103:
777:
427:
281:
243:
58:
823:
785:
1099:
542:
507:
322:
305:
264:
173:
163:
1147:
944:
927:
716:
569:
431:
1218:
For creating a new account to evade this block, the block is now one month, reset from this timestamp.
318:
105:
1006:
749:
742:
76:
42:
1279:
1065:
1023:
991:
769:
699:
Hi
Diligent007, This comment by you, "I just edited the article, I never clicked on the undo button"
442:
374:
1238:
1078:
892:
1259:
861:
436:
123:
71:
field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
1314:
869:
843:
805:
685:
589:
835:
640:
634:
601:
468:
1295:
1122:
1032:
827:
649:
68:
920:"your OPPORTUNITY to either oppose or support Qwyrxian in his big to become an administrator"
677:
639:
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the
581:
392:
260:
158:
1309:
Thanks for the warning. I opposed that Q guy's nomination for adminship. He is such a loser.
1193:
1143:
1050:
957:
940:
923:
712:
672:
we're wrong. If you would like to get the input of other editors, we have a process called
565:
995:
831:
797:
352:
154:
1219:
1002:
72:
50:
673:
623:
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for
1234:
1074:
703:
material, it still would qualify as a "revert". Also, "3RR" does not mean that you are
178:
1182:
Qwyrxian and disrupt the RfA process. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
689:
1310:
865:
839:
801:
681:
585:
1291:
1118:
1028:
659:
644:
119:
1110:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
63:
1318:
1299:
1242:
1222:
1212:
1151:
1126:
1082:
1058:
1036:
1010:
965:
948:
931:
897:
873:
847:
809:
789:
720:
654:
593:
573:
80:
830:; several other editors have pointed out why including this doesn't meet
711:
one doesn't have a strong emotional attachment to the outcome. regards,
541:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
1107:
919:
57:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
770:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Qwyrxian
1102:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
537:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
891:
state your case in the appropriate forum and let that be it.
800:), please do not add anything to that page (same to the IP).
292:
179:
Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
92:
24:
1161:
759:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
741:
607:
494:
553:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
1286:
where a person confiscates another's land and apologizes,
61:
on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking
1098:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
37:
to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out
1137:
937:
700:
998:
for further discussion. You can find that thread here
768:
Please feel free to add your constructive comments at
1231:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Diligent007
545:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
437:
Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award
939:. Way to slight your potential fellow opposers. --
532:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
174:Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on
1269:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_adminship/Qwyrxian
748:Hello, Diligent007. You have new messages at
1186:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
774:He is nominated for Administrator position.
8:
676:; probably the easiest step right now is
502:You currently appear to be engaged in an
164:Where to ask questions or make comments
1278:by such mild statements. In 2006, the
7:
563:from editing without further notice.
1049:have noticed that, but I didn't.)
557:. If you continue to edit war, you
133:Intuitive guide to Knowledge (XXG)
33:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
1258:and there is no such thing as a
1111:
1093:
62:
20:
169:Request administrator attention
1319:12:24, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
1288:"So sorry, this my garden now"
1064:Your edits have been taken as
510:with others and avoid editing
1:
1174:from editing for a period of
223:Biographies of living persons
88:
1132:"Knowledge (XXG) is a joke"
994:, I've taken the matter to
635:Administrators' noticeboard
248:Policy for non-free content
219:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1334:
1249:Thank you for RfA warnings
1202:, but you should read the
1142:Just a friendly advice. --
388:Simplified manual of style
155:Frequently asked questions
1300:20:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
1243:22:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1223:22:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1213:21:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1204:guide to appealing blocks
1184:make useful contributions
1152:20:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1127:18:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1083:19:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1059:18:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1037:18:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
1011:18:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
966:18:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
949:18:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
932:18:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
898:09:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
874:04:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
848:04:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
810:10:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
790:10:38, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
721:15:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
690:10:04, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
666:
655:06:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
594:06:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
574:05:09, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
128:Create your first article
1054:
996:the administrators board
990:As you are ignoring the
961:
506:. Users are expected to
81:03:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
1280:Swedish Knowledge (XXG)
547:appropriate noticeboard
188:Policies and guidelines
137:Article Creation Wizard
29:Hello, Diligent007 and
1305:Thanks for the warning
1271:- closed 26 July 2011.
1166:
824:User:Master of Puppets
764:Adminship for Qwyrxian
750:Cloveapple's talk page
746:
667:Okay, that's done with
612:
499:
1256:"It takes 2 to tango"
1198:Your reason here ~~~~
1165:
745:
611:
498:
197:Neutral point of view
124:Upload and use images
1209:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
278:Conflict of interest
201:No original research
1190:by adding the text
695:Edit warring policy
518:In particular, the
384:The perfect article
328:No personal attacks
1178:for attempting to
1167:
757:remove this notice
747:
674:dispute resolution
613:
551:dispute resolution
500:
456:Join a WikiProject
379:Develop an article
375:Be bold in editing
269:List of guidelines
35:your contributions
1188:appeal this block
1089:Your recent edits
992:canvassing policy
860:Please note--per
828:Talk:Cheney Mason
780:comment added by
663:
658:(False positive?
653:
626:Violation of the
520:three-revert rule
488:
487:
484:
483:
480:
479:
315:Assume good faith
289:
288:
235:Three-revert rule
87:
86:
41:below, ask me on
1325:
1210:
1201:
1164:
1115:
1097:
1096:
895:
792:
760:
738:
737:
733:
657:
647:
610:
600:Notification of
497:
465:Useful templates
410:Featured content
366:Writing articles
340:Community portal
332:No legal threats
310:Resolve disputes
293:
252:Image use policy
231:List of policies
210:Reliable sources
114:Getting mentored
110:Our five pillars
93:
89:
66:
55:
49:
25:
21:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1307:
1251:
1215:
1208:
1191:
1162:
1159:
1134:
1106:by typing four
1104:sign your posts
1094:
1091:
988:
893:
775:
766:
761:
754:
739:
735:
731:
729:
728:
697:
669:
608:
606:
555:page protection
495:
493:
420:
367:
306:Build consensus
298:
274:Deletion policy
189:
147:
98:
97:Getting started
83:
53:
47:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1331:
1329:
1306:
1303:
1284:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1250:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1226:
1225:
1168:You have been
1160:
1158:
1155:
1133:
1130:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
987:
986:ANI Discussion
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
894:Steven Walling
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
853:
852:
851:
850:
813:
812:
765:
762:
753:
740:
727:
724:
696:
693:
668:
665:
638:
620:
605:
598:
597:
596:
535:
534:
529:
522:states that:
515:
492:
489:
486:
485:
482:
481:
478:
477:
476:
475:
462:
453:
439:
434:
422:
421:
418:
415:
414:
413:
412:
403:
401:Disambiguation
390:
381:
369:
368:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
346:
336:
335:
334:
325:
312:
300:
299:
296:
290:
287:
286:
285:
284:
271:
257:External links
254:
241:
227:
226:
225:
216:
214:Citing sources
203:
191:
190:
187:
184:
183:
182:
181:
176:
171:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
130:
116:
100:
99:
96:
85:
84:
59:sign your name
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1330:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1304:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1281:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1261:
1257:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1224:
1221:
1217:
1216:
1214:
1211:
1205:
1199:
1195:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1140:
1138:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1114:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
997:
993:
985:
967:
963:
959:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
938:
935:
934:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
899:
896:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
817:
816:
815:
814:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:
793:
791:
787:
783:
779:
772:
771:
763:
758:
751:
744:
734:
725:
723:
722:
718:
714:
708:
706:
701:
694:
692:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
664:
661:
656:
651:
646:
642:
636:
632:
631:
629:
621:
618:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
578:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
564:
562:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
533:
530:
528:
525:
524:
523:
521:
516:
513:
509:
505:
490:
474:
470:
466:
463:
461:
457:
454:
452:
448:
444:
440:
438:
435:
433:
429:
426:
425:
424:
423:
419:Miscellaneous
417:
416:
411:
407:
404:
402:
398:
394:
391:
389:
385:
382:
380:
376:
373:
372:
371:
370:
364:
363:
358:
357:Mailing lists
354:
350:
347:
345:
341:
338:
337:
333:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
313:
311:
307:
304:
303:
302:
301:
297:The community
295:
294:
291:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
253:
249:
245:
242:
240:
239:Sock puppetry
236:
232:
229:
228:
224:
220:
217:
215:
211:
207:
206:Verifiability
204:
202:
198:
195:
194:
193:
192:
186:
185:
180:
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
160:
156:
153:
152:
151:
150:
144:
143:
138:
134:
131:
129:
125:
121:
117:
115:
111:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
95:
94:
91:
90:
82:
78:
74:
70:
65:
60:
56:
52:
44:
40:
36:
32:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
1308:
1287:
1276:
1255:
1252:
1197:
1175:
1169:
1141:
1135:
1092:
1069:
1047:
989:
782:80.84.55.209
776:— Preceding
773:
767:
709:
704:
698:
670:
628:Edit warring
625:
624:
622:
616:
614:
558:
536:
531:
526:
517:
512:disruptively
501:
491:Edit warring
473:User scripts
353:IRC channels
344:Village pump
146:Getting help
69:edit summary
46:
43:my talk page
39:Getting Help
38:
1144:Bobthefish2
1136:I saw this
1051:Diligent007
958:Diligent007
941:Bobthefish2
924:Bobthefish2
713:First Light
641:noticeboard
617:Diligent007
566:First Light
508:collaborate
460:Translation
406:Peer review
120:Edit a page
45:, or place
1220:Courcelles
1100:talk pages
1066:canvassing
1024:WP:CANVASS
1003:Dayewalker
660:Report it!
441:Clean up:
432:Talk pages
428:User pages
397:Categories
282:Notability
244:Copyrights
106:A tutorial
73:Cloveapple
1260:WP:BATTLE
1235:Gwen Gale
1157:July 2011
1075:Gwen Gale
862:WP:CANVAS
543:consensus
539:talk page
451:Vandalism
323:Etiquette
265:Vandalism
1311:Phead128
1196:|reason=
866:Qwyrxian
840:Qwyrxian
836:WP:UNDUE
802:Qwyrxian
778:unsigned
755:You can
705:entitled
682:Qwyrxian
650:MeowTalk
602:WP:AN/EW
586:Qwyrxian
549:or seek
504:edit war
349:Signpost
319:Civility
118:How to:
17:Welcome!
1292:Wikid77
1206:first.
1194:unblock
1171:blocked
1119:SineBot
1029:Diannaa
678:WP:BLPN
645:NekoBot
633:at the
582:WP:3RRN
561:blocked
559:may be
443:General
31:Welcome
1180:harass
1176:1 week
1108:tildes
832:WP:BLP
798:WP:RFA
730:": -->
630:policy
615:Hello
604:report
51:helpme
469:Tools
393:Stubs
1315:talk
1296:talk
1239:talk
1229:See
1148:talk
1123:talk
1079:talk
1055:talk
1033:talk
1007:talk
962:talk
945:talk
928:talk
870:talk
844:talk
834:and
806:talk
786:talk
732:edit
726:Re:
717:talk
686:talk
590:talk
570:talk
447:Spam
261:Spam
159:Tips
77:talk
408:•
1317:)
1298:)
1241:)
1233:.
1200:}}
1192:{{
1150:)
1125:)
1117:--
1081:)
1057:)
1035:)
1027:--
1009:)
1001:.
964:)
947:)
930:)
872:)
846:)
808:)
788:)
719:)
688:)
592:)
572:)
471:•
467:•
458:•
449:•
445:•
430:•
399:•
395:•
386:•
377:•
355:•
351:•
342:•
330:•
321:•
317:•
308:•
280:•
276:•
267:•
263:•
259:•
250:•
246:•
237:•
233:•
221:•
212:•
208:•
199:•
157:•
135:•
126:•
122:•
112:•
108:•
79:)
54:}}
48:{{
1313:(
1294:(
1237:(
1146:(
1121:(
1077:(
1053:(
1031:(
1005:(
960:(
943:(
926:(
868:(
842:(
804:(
784:(
752:.
736:]
715:(
684:(
662:)
652:)
648:(
637:.
619:,
588:(
568:(
514:.
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
