156:
I said, I'm new at this, and all I attempted to do was edit the page I created. Somehow this resulted in the 2 messages I received (apparently, for each time I tried to edit the page). I will not do this again as long as I know what I did incorrectly; I thought I was just editing the page and by no means did I wilfully attempt to remove the speedy deletion notice. Thank you in advance for explaining what I did incorrectly. Additionally, my article is a work in progress and by no means a finished product. I did not have adequate time to complete it, however I plan to do so shortly. I would greatly appreciate it if my article is not deleted. Thank you.--
404:
vandalism. You do have other options than putting those warnings back, though. For instance, post new warnings. Use different wording, indicate with diffs the new problems, and for goodness sake don't use a stupid template—that's inflammatory in itself. Please talk to him like a human being, in your own words. (And, this is up to you, but can I ask you to please cut him some slack, at least in your wording and tone, because he feels bad? See
557:
439:
and won't request a block—I'm more interested in making
Knowledge informative than in engaging in time-consuming arguments that don't concern me or the encyclopedia itself much. Watching a single user's talk page isn't the type of thing I would usually have done either, if I hadn't felt offended and
434:
Of course I'll relax, now that things have been clarified (thanks to you). There have definitely been a couple of misconceptions on my side, the major one being that warnings must either stay or be archived. So when I noticed that my warnings were being silently removed without any explanation on my
398:
No, that won't wash. The nearest thing it says at those links to what you claim is "by removing he's acknowledging that he's read them". See? If he removes them, it shows he's read them. That means you shouldn't put them back. He only needs to read them once, and they're in the
History, in case you
155:
Hello, I'm not sure why exactly my behaviour "has not been too impressive." I'm new at this and if I did anything inaproppriate, then I apologize. I've received 2 messages to stop removing speedy deletion notices (I think you're referring to this); however, I don't know exactly how that happened. As
188:
and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks
295:
Leave
Bonafide.hustla's page alone, please, and stop putting those warnings back. It's a common misconception that it's appropriate to try to force users to keep some kind of brand of shame on their pages, or to force them to archive. (The History is an archive in itself.) Please see "User space
374:
Note also that the cited incidents on WP:ANI indicate that it is OK for a user to remove a warning once it is read and acknowledged. However, the edit summaries (and contributions) of
Certified.Gangsta show clearly that he/she has not acknowledged the legitimacy of the warnings, considers them
403:
before he's allowed to remove them. That said, I can understood how annoying it is that he keeps up the behaviour you warned him against, because of course you're quite right that deleting other users' comments on talkpages is inappropriate and against policy. He might be blocked for it, as
958:). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely
327:
OK. Sorry, didn't know about that, but, just to clarify, I wasn't trying to "shame" him/her either. It appears as though
Certified.Gangsta hasn't gotten the intended message, however, because he/she has followed the initial removal of my legitimate comment(s) at
473:
Hi Dto, thanks for the translation, i added a category, the only thing i could think of, perfect job, you can also translate directly on the page, (sometimes easyer if you use the interwikilinks) just ad {{Template:Intranslation}} until it is finished , Cheers
962:
edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on
November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I
312:. The templates about not removing warnings, and the block threats, are for anonymous vandals, not for cases like this. Note that I don't mean to criticize you—the misconception is common, as I say—but please stop now.
1016:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
408:. And, while I understand that you have reasons for "outing" his new username, and aren't doing it out of malice, is it absolutely necessary?) Or, if you want to up the stakes, I suppose you can post on
975:, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers!
570:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
972:
111:. The software that runs Knowledge will automatically convert this into a signature which contains your username and the date and time you posted the message, so other users don't get confused.
435:
talk page (for example), I decided I wouldn't let him get away with what I thought was inappropriate and perhaps even somewhat disrespectful behavior. Anyways, I have reworded my comments at
250:, and it is unlikely that there will eventually be two different articles at the two locations), I guess it wasn't necessary to actually make an edit with few other changes. Regarding the
724:
687:
951:
757:
823:
634:
266:
uses it in one of its wikitext examples.) If there is already a consensus on
Knowledge to use the "correct" markup, though, I'd happily comply. Thanks. —
954:, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $ 20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (
185:
797:
Thanks for your comment—not sure why I didn't see it right away. The reason I think the previous version was misleading is because the normalizer in
114:
I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to
Knowledge, and don't forget to
93:
914:
There is something very odd about this proof and I will have to think about it some more. I miss not having my group theory book on hand. :)
208:
1041:
243:
1037:
516:
Why do you think she has only served five terms? Please be careful before changing people's edits when you're in the wrong!!!
971:
page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the
242:
Thanks for pointing me to that paragraph about redirects—although I technically did not break any of the rules on that page (
399:
want evidence that you posted them (and that he read them). He's by no means required to acknowledge that the warnings are
66:
36:
1028:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1033:
263:
484:
2, if you want to see what changes can be made you can put the template {{copyedit}} on top, to request a check. reg.
47:. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:
247:
56:
837:
538:
452:
387:
364:
278:
692:
639:
104:
130:
436:
329:
51:
107:. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with two hyphens followed by four tildes
968:
729:
608:
297:
230:
81:
184:
This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject
Disambiguation participants. I recently left a
103:
If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an
1029:
923:
885:
778:
115:
86:
567:
417:
317:
171:
157:
76:
126:
1005:
996:
580:
563:
726:), but working off of the reasoning which followed, we would obtain an even smaller subgroup
1025:
1009:
985:
190:
71:
1024:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
517:
225:
1021:
1013:
919:
881:
774:
573:
96:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
808:
805:
of H/Z is itself, so we are no longer working over G (and, in terms of your notation,
619:
1017:
413:
409:
313:
301:
142:
61:
258:
upon rendering by MediaWiki. So it's really an aesthetic difference, and I believe
207:
you made and wanted to point out a couple of things. First, you might want to read
44:
976:
499:
Hi, I'm not sure you know how congressional terms work but I'll try to explain:
211:— it came as a shock to me when I first saw it. Secondly, why are you replacing
100:
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
485:
475:
40:
955:
853:
Actually, you were completely correct to begin with. It should have been
826:
789:
527:
441:
376:
353:
267:
119:
934:
896:
590:
526:
Sorry about that. You're right. Easy on the tone, though. Thanks. —
556:
220:
209:
Knowledge:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken
1012:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
931:
893:
786:
186:
proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page
1045:
990:
843:
583:
544:
520:
488:
478:
458:
420:
393:
320:
284:
236:
223:, the former is valid XHTML and provides better compatibility.
193:
174:
160:
145:
21:: I will usually reply on this page unless otherwise requested.
254:
tag, I understand it is invalid XHTML, but it is converted to
738:
555:
338:), for which he/she was warned, with three more such edits (
825:
was defined in terms of G). Does that make sense? Thanks. —
603:
I think that what existed was correct, but it was unclear.
92:
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
375:"vandalism," and will continue to act inappropriately. —
597:
405:
348:
344:
340:
334:
309:
305:
204:
811:
732:
695:
642:
622:
950:I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the
956:see the project page for details on scoring points
817:
751:
718:
681:
628:
264:m:Help:Editing#Most frequent wiki markup explained
170:... and dont forget to link it on your page... ;p
1004:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
689:, at least one has smallest order (orders are in
576:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
72:How to revert to a previous version of a page
8:
952:November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest
946:Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
876:Sorry. I don't know what I was thinking.
810:
737:
731:
711:
702:
697:
694:
664:
650:
641:
621:
719:{\displaystyle \mathbf {Z} ^{+}\cup {0}}
682:{\displaystyle H=\mathrm {Norm} _{G}(H)}
180:WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request
7:
764:Your wording is also fine, though.
300:, and several threads currently on
660:
657:
654:
651:
566:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
291:Bonafide.hustla--Certified.Gangsta
262:looks much cleaner. (For example,
14:
1030:review the candidates' statements
244:Link (The Legend of Zelda series)
967:credit links fixed by turning a
752:{\displaystyle H^{\prime }\in S}
698:
495:Zoe Lofgren and Gunn High School
1036:. For the Election committee,
1006:Arbitration Committee election
997:ArbCom elections are now open!
676:
670:
175:17:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
141:Yes, I'm a Sophomore at Gunn.
1:
1046:13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
991:02:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
636:of all counterexamples where
545:07:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
521:03:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
161:04:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
581:♥Fighting for charming Love♥
572:Smile at others by adding {{
564:♥Fighting for charming Love♥
489:22:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
479:21:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
459:04:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
421:02:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
394:01:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
321:18:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
285:03:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
237:15:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
166:Welcome to Polish Knowledge!
1032:and submit your choices on
412:to request he be blocked.
194:21:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
146:05:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
94:New contributors' help page
1061:
1038:MediaWiki message delivery
513:2006 ELECTED SEVENTH TIME
248:Link (The Legend of Zelda)
246:is obviously an alias for
62:Frequently Asked Questions
43:, a free and open-content
844:19:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
584:19:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
507:2000 ELECTED FOURTH TIME
503:1996 ELECTED SECOND TIME
52:Five Pillars of Knowledge
616:If you consider the set
511:2004 ELECTED SIXTH TIME
509:2002 ELECTED FIFTH TIME
505:1998 ELECTED THIRD TIME
501:1994 ELECTED FIRST TIME
915:
877:
770:
819:
753:
720:
683:
630:
560:
437:Talk:Culture of Taiwan
330:Talk:Culture of Taiwan
116:tell us about yourself
1010:Arbitration Committee
820:
754:
721:
684:
631:
607:there meant of least
559:
131:User:PEAR/FriendlyDay
28:Welcome to Knowledge!
809:
730:
693:
640:
620:
406:this post on my page
298:Knowledge:Harassment
1014:arbitration process
759:- a contradiction.
596:(This is regarding
221:XHTML#Common errors
199:Redirects and XHTML
1026:arbitration policy
815:
749:
716:
679:
626:
561:
219:? As mentioned in
215:with the improper
203:Hi Dto, I noticed
67:How to edit a page
818:{\displaystyle S}
629:{\displaystyle S}
1052:
983:
926:
917:
888:
879:
842:
841:
835:
824:
822:
821:
816:
781:
772:
758:
756:
755:
750:
742:
741:
725:
723:
722:
717:
715:
707:
706:
701:
688:
686:
685:
680:
669:
668:
663:
635:
633:
632:
627:
543:
542:
536:
457:
456:
450:
392:
391:
385:
369:
368:
362:
351:
337:
283:
282:
276:
261:
257:
253:
233:
228:
218:
214:
110:
99:
57:Community Portal
1060:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1034:the voting page
1000:
977:
948:
924:
886:
836:
830:
829:
807:
806:
779:
733:
728:
727:
696:
691:
690:
649:
638:
637:
618:
617:
594:
578:
553:
537:
531:
530:
497:
471:
451:
445:
444:
440:disrespected. —
386:
380:
379:
363:
357:
356:
339:
333:
296:harassment" in
293:
277:
271:
270:
259:
255:
251:
231:
226:
216:
212:
201:
189:for your time.
182:
168:
153:
139:
108:
97:
31:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1058:
1056:
1003:
999:
994:
973:Daily Disambig
947:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
912:
904:
903:
902:
901:
871:
847:
846:
814:
748:
745:
740:
736:
714:
710:
705:
700:
678:
675:
672:
667:
662:
659:
656:
653:
648:
645:
625:
593:
587:
571:
554:
552:
549:
548:
547:
512:
510:
508:
506:
504:
502:
500:
496:
493:
492:
491:
470:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
427:
426:
425:
424:
371:
370:
292:
289:
288:
287:
200:
197:
181:
178:
167:
164:
152:
149:
138:
135:
129:19:02, August
90:
89:
84:
79:
74:
69:
64:
59:
54:
30:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1057:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
998:
995:
993:
992:
989:
988:
984:
982:
981:
974:
970:
969:WP:DABCONCEPT
966:
961:
957:
953:
945:
936:
933:
929:
927:
921:
913:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
900:
898:
895:
891:
889:
883:
874:
873:
870:
868:
864:
860:
856:
851:
850:
849:
848:
845:
839:
834:
828:
812:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
793:
791:
788:
784:
782:
776:
766:
765:
761:
760:
746:
743:
734:
712:
708:
703:
673:
665:
646:
643:
623:
613:
612:
610:
606:
600:
598:
592:
588:
586:
585:
582:
577:
575:
569:
565:
558:
550:
546:
540:
535:
529:
525:
524:
523:
522:
519:
514:
494:
490:
487:
483:
482:
481:
480:
477:
468:
460:
454:
449:
443:
438:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
422:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
397:
396:
395:
389:
384:
378:
373:
372:
366:
361:
355:
350:
346:
342:
336:
331:
326:
325:
324:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
290:
286:
280:
275:
269:
265:
256:<br /: -->
249:
245:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:
234:
229:
222:
213:<br /: -->
210:
206:
198:
196:
195:
192:
187:
179:
177:
176:
173:
172:MonteChristof
165:
163:
162:
159:
150:
148:
147:
144:
137:Re: Gunn High
136:
134:
132:
128:
123:
121:
120:your userpage
117:
112:
106:
105:administrator
101:
95:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
53:
50:
49:
48:
46:
42:
38:
34:
29:
26:
23:
22:
20:
1001:
986:
979:
978:
964:
959:
949:
918:
880:
875:
872:
866:
862:
858:
854:
852:
832:
802:
798:
773:
768:
767:
763:
762:
615:
614:
604:
602:
601:
595:
579:
562:
533:
515:
498:
472:
447:
400:
382:
359:
335:link to edit
294:
273:
224:
202:
183:
169:
154:
151:Re: Warnings
140:
124:
113:
102:
91:
45:encyclopedia
35:
32:
27:
18:
17:
16:
920:D. Trebbien
882:D. Trebbien
775:D. Trebbien
589:An edit to
574:subst:Smile
260:<br: -->
252:<br: -->
217:<br: -->
191:Nehrams2020
133:2006 (UTC)
1022:topic bans
869:different.
518:Alamar2000
401:legitimate
98:{{helpme}}
82:Copyrights
33:Dear Dto,
1018:site bans
205:this edit
87:Shortcuts
41:Knowledge
865:, which
838:contribs
790:March 24
769:Cheers.
605:Smallest
568:WikiLove
539:contribs
453:contribs
414:Bishonen
388:contribs
365:contribs
314:Bishonen
304:, e. g.
279:contribs
143:Kazuhite
77:Tutorial
935:April 9
911:Hi Dto,
897:April 8
591:p group
37:Welcome
1008:. The
980:bd2412
930:01:23
892:01:40
857:, not
785:02:26
410:WP:ANI
349:edit 3
345:edit 2
341:edit 1
302:WP:ANI
158:Alconi
109:--~~~~
937:(UTC)
899:(UTC)
792:(UTC)
609:order
232:shtak
227:Pagra
1042:talk
965:will
960:nine
932:2008
925:talk
894:2008
887:talk
833:talk
787:2008
780:talk
534:talk
486:Mion
476:Mion
469:CUTE
448:talk
418:talk
383:talk
360:talk
352:). —
318:talk
310:this
308:and
306:this
274:talk
127:PEAR
19:Note
1002:Hi,
827:dto
599:.)
551:^_^
528:dto
442:dto
377:dto
354:dto
268:dto
118:on
39:to
1044:)
1020:,
867:is
744:∈
739:′
709:∪
611:.
416:|
347:,
343:,
323:.
316:|
125:--
122:.
1040:(
987:T
928:)
922:(
916:«
890:)
884:(
878:«
863:Z
861:/
859:G
855:G
840:)
831:(
813:S
803:Z
801:/
799:G
783:)
777:(
771:«
747:S
735:H
713:0
704:+
699:Z
677:)
674:H
671:(
666:G
661:m
658:r
655:o
652:N
647:=
644:H
624:S
541:)
532:(
455:)
446:(
423:.
390:)
381:(
367:)
358:(
332:(
281:)
272:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.