Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:EdBedden

Source 📝

396: 264: 115: 23: 225:
Why don't you say that the author of the book rejects the idea that the coat of arms had an influence on the flag, instead of making Knowledge (XXG) speak with the author's voice, to start with? There are also structural problems, when a large chunk of text (much of which only has a tangential
422:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
38:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
118:
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible
183:
Your edits to that article contain some interesting information, but it seems to be interlarded with dogmatic personal pontificating, and the overall result is not too useful to Knowledge (XXG) in that particular form. Please go to
207:. I even footnoted it. I'll change it a bit, but I'm not sure what you mean by "dogmatic personal pontificating" since no opinions are expressed. Everything is based on facts gleaned from solid historical research. 426:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
351:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 419: 169:. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See 243:
I cut back on some of the text and I believe that it flows from the previous paragraph, which also deals with the idea that the coat of arms somehow inspired the Stars and Stripes.
142:
articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to
408: 166: 185: 170: 376: 162: 147: 135: 83: 35: 177: 226:
relationship with the subject of the article) is introduced without any subsection header or other useful internal organization...
143: 102: 31: 403: 387: 372: 98: 58:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
412: 363:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
65: 368: 151: 127: 91: 87: 26:
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
288:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
158: 364: 97:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have conflict of interest, please see
321: 340: 331: 360: 344: 82:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
308:
Palgave Macmillan, 2014; ''Lafayette: Lessons in Leadership from the Idealist General'' (Palgrave
231: 193: 161:
under Knowledge (XXG) guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that
356: 348: 75: 359:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 352: 120: 432: 317: 313: 268: 101:. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see 74:
to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see
302:], and ]. His books include ''What So Proudly We Hailed: Francis Scott Key, A Life'' 244: 227: 208: 189: 277: 27: 312:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
428: 114: 22: 347:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
436: 380: 325: 252: 235: 216: 197: 138:. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not 420:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Mosby Heritage Area Association
281: 68:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
134:
discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on
203:
Every word in my edits was taken from the well-sourced book
407:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
401:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
289: 285: 273: 284:
by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
163:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a personal webspace provider
339:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 297:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 99:our frequently asked questions for organizations 188:, where the matter can be suitably discussed. 8: 409:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 171:Knowledge (XXG):Wikipedians with articles 186:Talk:Coat of arms of George Washington 271:. I have automatically detected that 148:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 34:. In keeping with Knowledge (XXG)'s 7: 144:Knowledge (XXG):No original research 103:our conflict of interest guidelines 14: 418:The article will be discussed at 365:review the candidates' statements 178:Coat of arms of George Washington 394: 262: 113: 21: 404:Mosby Heritage Area Association 388:Mosby Heritage Area Association 371:. For the Election committee, 341:Arbitration Committee election 332:ArbCom elections are now open! 1: 381:16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 152:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 17:Possible conflict of interest 437:12:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 88:verifiability of information 367:and submit your choices on 205:Flag: An American Biography 165:and would thus qualify for 452: 373:MediaWiki message delivery 314:these opt-out instructions 326:10:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC) 411:or whether it should be 253:15:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 248: 236:13:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 217:19:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 212: 198:02:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 290:my operator's talk page 128:article about yourself 45:exercise great caution 345:Arbitration Committee 136:articles for deletion 84:neutral point of view 36:neutral point of view 280:may have broken the 121:conflict of interest 76:Knowledge (XXG):Spam 66:deletion discussions 32:conflict of interest 349:arbitration process 361:arbitration policy 30:, you may have a 443: 398: 397: 307: 293: 266: 265: 117: 25: 451: 450: 446: 445: 444: 442: 441: 440: 399: 395: 392: 369:the voting page 335: 303: 272: 263: 260: 181: 173:.) Thank you. 167:speedy deletion 157:If you are not 111: 92:autobiographies 19: 12: 11: 5: 449: 447: 393: 391: 386:Nomination of 384: 338: 334: 329: 310: 309: 299: 298: 259: 256: 241: 240: 239: 238: 220: 219: 180: 175: 110: 107: 105:. Thank you. 80: 79: 69: 59: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 448: 439: 438: 434: 430: 424: 421: 416: 414: 410: 406: 405: 389: 385: 383: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 333: 330: 328: 327: 323: 319: 315: 306: 301: 300: 296: 295: 294: 291: 287: 286:edit the page 283: 279: 275: 270: 257: 255: 254: 250: 246: 237: 233: 229: 224: 223: 222: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 201: 200: 199: 195: 191: 187: 179: 176: 174: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 124: 122: 116: 108: 106: 104: 100: 95: 93: 89: 85: 77: 73: 70: 67: 63: 62:participating 60: 57: 53: 50: 49: 48: 46: 42: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 425: 417: 402: 400: 390:for deletion 336: 311: 304: 278:Marc Leepson 261: 242: 204: 182: 156: 139: 131: 126:Creating an 125: 112: 96: 81: 71: 61: 55: 51: 44: 40: 28:Marc Leepson 20: 267:Hello, I'm 357:topic bans 318:BracketBot 316:. Thanks, 269:BracketBot 353:site bans 274:your edit 258:June 2014 159:"notable" 245:EdBedden 228:AnonMoos 209:EdBedden 190:AnonMoos 132:strongly 56:creating 413:deleted 72:linking 52:editing 343:. The 282:syntax 150:, and 109:WP:COI 90:, and 47:when: 429:Daask 140:start 41:avoid 433:talk 377:talk 322:talk 249:talk 232:talk 213:talk 194:talk 337:Hi, 276:to 154:. 130:is 123:. 64:in 54:or 43:or 435:) 415:. 379:) 355:, 324:) 251:) 234:) 215:) 196:) 146:, 94:. 86:, 78:). 431:( 375:( 320:( 305:( 292:. 247:( 230:( 211:( 192:(

Index


Marc Leepson
conflict of interest
neutral point of view
deletion discussions
Knowledge (XXG):Spam
neutral point of view
verifiability of information
autobiographies
our frequently asked questions for organizations
our conflict of interest guidelines

conflict of interest
article about yourself
articles for deletion
Knowledge (XXG):No original research
Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
"notable"
Knowledge (XXG) is not a personal webspace provider
speedy deletion
Knowledge (XXG):Wikipedians with articles
Coat of arms of George Washington
Talk:Coat of arms of George Washington
AnonMoos
talk
02:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
EdBedden
talk
19:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.