1138:
1065:
992:
388:, so he couldn't respond you. For the issue your point to it (the bot), yhe unique solution is to found on which wiki the mistake exist : all languages on which we have fr:Correspondance (transports) en:Transit pass,de:Zeitkarte. Then to modify all wiki yourself to have a correct situation. After you hope that nobody do the error again. Sorry, it's the unique solution I know --
487:; I find telecom and certain other fields (business and management is a prolific offender) seem to want noun group that's vaguely technical, and more, to be upcased. It's like a cancer. However, I've been told that things ending in Protocol, Model, Framework, etc, might be left upcased, as they can be considered to be proper nouns ... hmmm.
592:
siblings. There's a professional and organisational motivation for upcasing everything in sight that most external styleguides don't like, and nor does WP's house style. However, I've downcased a lot of articles, especially in business, management, and accounting, with not a glimmer of objection from anyone. They
614:
The technology and telecom people take the hardest line on this. As well as ... bizarrely, the
British railways wikiproject people who want their Chief Engineering Officer. And NASA engineers and North American dog-breeders are another corner of caps infestation that meets resistance when intelligent
170:
still stands, and he has said to me on his talk page that he "will not view favorably any attempt to press your point other then by reaching consensus first". It seems to me that you and others reached the consensus last year, and he is the one who needs to demonstrate consensus for his latest edit.
202:
I regret that currently I'm too busy in RL to get involved in a long policy discussion, sorry. I don't see any arguments in this new discussion so far that haven't been made in the archived one. Without new arguments the discussion will just go round in circles. I very much appreciate your effort to
175:
which until last night said "accessdate: Full date when item was accessed, if it was found on line. This is not needed when the article is itself clearly dated. In such a case, accessdate, if used at all, should be commented out so as not to be visible to the ordinary reader." (which is the essence
591:
Yeah, it's becoming more of an issue. We've had Halley's C/comet and there's a fuss going on at Chief
Mechanical Engineer, which the UK railways people are insisting remain upcased against all logic and, indeed, WP:TITLE, which says article titles should as far as possible be consistent with their
506:
Hi Tony, thanks for your support. :-) Interesting rule of thumb. I followed it in so far as I did not downcase any of the protocols. For the OSI model I used the spelling of its WP article. The layers should be fine in lower case as they are not proper names by any definition I know. Thanks again,
427:
I think it's easier that you and me learn japanese that try to add a "shield" on an interwiki bot. The bot couldn't understood that he is making a mistake. One solution could be checlking the history (of each article) if this link have been remove earlier but interwiki bot would overload the cache
883:
says "Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus. Should that edit later be revised by another editor without dispute, it can be assumed that a new consensus has been reached." If my edit had changed something visible, then there might be need for
859:
Hi S. Rich, thanks for bringing this up here. The revert was about the source formatting, i.e., only relevant to the editor but invisible to the user. Some editors, including myself, prefer a blank line after each section title to make the article structure visible. Therefore, please don't remove
232:
I strongly feel this one should stay. It is the police. They do have a lot of first hand experience and they certainly (should) have access to a lot of collaborating statistics, such as the number of immigrants deported. And the size of the discrepancy is so large (7-15% of the total population),
884:
discussion. But we do not involve ourselves with discussion on trivial, non-consequential matters as to whether some editors like a space after each section heading or not. I don't mind at all that you reverted, but asking for consensus before such edits it not part of the program. Thanks. –
1077:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
288:
Thanks Sumsum for the anecdote. :-) It is beyond me why anyone would use a drawing tool that is not vector-oriented to draw flowcharts. That approach appears to have only downsides, no advantages. Anyway, I guess this point is not worth any more energy. Thanks again for your comment.
1150:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
129:. I for one am a opponent of the hidden accessdate parameter, as I stated there. Somebody else is a clear proponent. Although it would seem you are an proponent also, in deference to your knowledge of this subject, I would like to invite you and state your opinion there.
1004:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
906:
I find this approach too confrontational. Look, if you find this matter trivial then simply leave the formatting alone rather than risk irritating other editors. If the source is consistently formatted then there is really no reason to touch it.
711:). I bring it up only because there appears to be a four-hour difference between UTC and the time zone you've selected; it's an extremely minor point, so I'm just offering this comment as something to keep in the back of one's mind. Cheers, --
878:
Come on. "Some editors" want a blank line, therefore other editors should seek consensus? They should mention it on the talk page, or post an RfC, or what? Rather, keep in mind that WP is a project that anyone can edit and
1178:
1105:
1032:
947:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
428:
server with this type of frequent request also with a very few gain. A lot of false positive could be found. The earlier removing could be a vandalism or a renaming... so it's very hard to developp a shield. --
576:
As for the MoS, I see capitalization as a more general question that is not particular to computing, even if abuse is rife in this field. Either way, I'll certainly be happy to offer my opinion if that helps.
615:
formatting is raised. Other areas tend to be fine with WP's long-standing and stylish (= easy to read) house rules. Fear not, reform usually takes a few waves of pushing on a wiki before success comes.
1162:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1089:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1016:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
665:
It is different with future years, the link to the article on 2030 is very relevant in the context and is obstructing people who may wish to visit that article. I believe it should be linked.♦
364:
contradicts them in any way. The quotation marks make it perfectly clear that "sugar hat" is only a literal translation and the text explains that it is really a loaf of sugar. Greetings, --
248:
Hi Nic, IMHO giving three references for a single point is more than enough. The current references name their sources while the new link doesn't which makes it unverifiable. Please see
699:
Hi! I was editing the article 'Some Kind of
Wonderful' and noticed a minor issue I wanted to bring to your attention. When signing and dating others' unsigned comments, as
801:
Thanks for your support. Yes, I also have my doubts about that other edit and just didn't want to open a parallel discussion, yet. But it needs to be addressed. Thanks, --
573:
Fair enough, thanks for chiming in! I have to say, I admire how you dealt with the ensuing ad-hominem attacks. I'll have to think about my next post there for a while.
252:. Numbers that are not based on proper statistics are not encyclopedic, even if they come from the police. I believe the current three links make the stronger case. --
177:
126:
539:
OK, I'll take a look there, but will have to reveal that I was pointed there by you (canvassing policy, etc). But I think it's safe for me to to point
275:
I have made flow charts with
Microsoft Paint, not fancy but they are flow charts. Just thought I should enlighten you. I have NOT undone your edit.
80:
1192:
1119:
1046:
972:
351:
180:)? If you, as a more senior Wikipedian than I, were to feel able make that change back yourself, it would carry more weight. Thanks,
89:
48:
1188:
1115:
1042:
968:
1171:
1098:
1025:
786:
that might be related. Please keep the faith and hope you can continue to contribute despite the unwarranted personal attack.
43:
547:. Perhaps you can offer advice when changes are proposed there (I presume you have some sort of expertise in the field!).
26:
959:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
53:
1183:
1110:
1037:
964:
880:
249:
308:
276:
227:
I see you removed my link to the South
African Police Service Annual Report on the basis that it is unqualified.
33:
22:
1159:
1086:
1013:
125:
I started a discussion about the hidden accessdate parameter. At that time I was unaware of the discussion at
60:
752:
178:
Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources/Archive_25#Retrieval_dates_for_online_versions_of_old_printed_sources.2C_again
163:
127:
Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources/Archive_25#Retrieval_dates_for_online_versions_of_old_printed_sources.2C_again
122:
339:
331:. Whilst the components of the word can be broken down and translated literally as "sugar hat" the correct
64:
822:
347:
172:
960:
76:
68:
677:
666:
456:
409:
38:
889:
849:
704:
1146:
1073:
1000:
982:
936:
927:
791:
203:
remind people of what's been discussed without entering into an edit war. Keep up the good work! --
134:
1155:
1082:
1009:
956:
940:
844:
Maybe I'm missing something. Did my edit (with AutoEd) change the visible layout of anything? –
830:
748:
437:
397:
167:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
75:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
744:
713:
343:
185:
1167:
1094:
1021:
952:
944:
782:
Thanks for the notice, hope we can keep the damage under control. Noticed also this somewhat
385:
361:
238:
1170:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1163:
1097:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1090:
1024:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1017:
955:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
948:
885:
845:
624:
604:
555:
544:
495:
311:
279:
787:
522:
130:
335:
is sugarloaf. mit freundlichen Grüßen, Der
Nikolaus 08:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
826:
429:
389:
181:
1137:
1064:
991:
908:
861:
825:
that refers to a change you made some time ago. Would appreciate your insight.
802:
763:
724:
681:
636:
578:
526:
508:
460:
413:
365:
290:
253:
234:
204:
145:
102:
617:
597:
548:
488:
328:
269:
1174:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1101:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1028:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
943:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1196:
1123:
1050:
976:
916:
893:
869:
853:
834:
810:
795:
771:
756:
732:
717:
689:
671:
644:
630:
609:
586:
560:
534:
516:
500:
468:
442:
421:
402:
373:
314:
298:
282:
261:
242:
212:
189:
153:
138:
110:
95:
327:
Just to late you know that Zuckerhut is the usual German word for
166:. Meanwhile, however, Debresser's removal of the relevant text at
72:
1177:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1104:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1031:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
360:
Hi Eugenes, your points are certainly valid. I don't think the
596:
they shouldn't be indulging themselves in this oneupmanship!
723:
Thanks for pointing that out and fixing it there! Cheers, --
144:
Thanks much for the pointer. I'll have a look. Cheers, --
1158:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1085:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1012:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
783:
708:
700:
484:
228:
162:
Hi, I am glad you have come back to this discussion at
233:
that you don't need to employ statistical methods. --
860:
these lines without consensus. Thanks and regards, --
83:, or ask your question on this page and then place
935:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
545:the sorry state of the MoS/Computing guidelines
101:Err, I've been here for a year. But thanks. --
743:For whatever it's worth, you may wish to see
543:to an issue I've raised more generally about
384:Hello, for your information Ptbotgourou is a
8:
307:I did just because I only had one option.=)
59:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
171:Would you support restoring the text at
87:before the question. Again, welcome! --
250:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability#Sources
7:
1147:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1074:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1001:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1160:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1087:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1014:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1131:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1058:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
164:Template_talk:Cite_news#Accessdate
123:Template_talk:Cite_news#Accessdate
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
961:review the candidates' statements
762:Many thanks! I answered there. --
523:Talk:OSI_model#Capitalized_layers
1136:
1063:
990:
1181:and submit your choices on the
1108:and submit your choices on the
521:Oh, and I could use some help:
967:. For the Election committee,
937:Arbitration Committee election
928:ArbCom elections are now open!
610:10:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
587:09:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
561:02:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
535:19:59, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
517:19:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
501:16:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
469:12:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
443:08:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
422:14:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
403:11:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
213:21:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
190:18:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
154:08:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
139:00:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
1197:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1144:Hello, EnOreg. Voting in the
1071:Hello, EnOreg. Voting in the
1051:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
998:Hello, EnOreg. Voting in the
977:17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
811:19:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
796:17:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
772:14:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
757:13:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
690:19:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
672:18:39, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
485:Multiprotocol_Label_Switching
374:14:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
262:11:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
243:21:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
176:of the compromise reached at
1124:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
733:08:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
718:07:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
645:13:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
631:11:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
91:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
49:How to write a great article
1035:and submit your choices on
963:and submit your choices on
835:17:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
745:my comment on the talk page
483:Hi, saw your downcasing in
1217:
1189:MediaWiki message delivery
1116:MediaWiki message delivery
1043:MediaWiki message delivery
1033:the candidates' statements
969:MediaWiki message delivery
917:09:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
894:15:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
870:06:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
854:22:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
739:Hyphenating "rent seeking"
315:22:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
299:11:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
283:23:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
223:Immigrants in South Africa
117:Access dates in references
821:Hi, I made a comment in
703:, it is often helpful to
77:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
912:
865:
840:Constrained optimization
806:
767:
728:
705:indicate the time in UTC
685:
640:
582:
530:
512:
464:
417:
369:
294:
257:
208:
149:
111:03:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
106:
96:03:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
695:Dating undated comments
268:Regarding Your Edit On
823:Template talk:OSIstack
680:and answered there) --
459:of this discussion. --
412:of this discussion. --
173:Template:Cite_news/doc
1156:Arbitration Committee
1083:Arbitration Committee
1010:Arbitration Committee
983:ArbCom Elections 2016
941:Arbitration Committee
661:Sorry, linking years
945:arbitration process
778:Fixing "OSI" damage
21:Hello, EnOreg, and
1172:arbitration policy
1099:arbitration policy
1026:arbitration policy
985:: Voting now open!
957:arbitration policy
479:Curing capitalitis
309:Sign My Guestbook!
277:Sign My Guestbook!
168:Template:Cite_news
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
817:Template OSIstack
784:questionable edit
457:original location
455:(Answered at the
440:
410:original location
408:(Answered at the
400:
356:
342:comment added by
67:your messages on
1208:
1140:
1067:
994:
881:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
669:
629:
627:
622:
607:
602:
558:
553:
498:
493:
438:
398:
355:
336:
323:Feuerzangenbowle
94:
92:
86:
69:discussion pages
1216:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1141:
1133:
1128:
1127:
1068:
1060:
1055:
1054:
1038:the voting page
995:
987:
965:the voting page
931:
842:
819:
780:
741:
697:
678:original thread
667:
663:
625:
618:
616:
605:
598:
556:
549:
496:
489:
481:
382:
337:
325:
312:User:Sumsum2010
280:User:Sumsum2010
273:
225:
119:
90:
88:
84:
54:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
1214:
1212:
1179:the candidates
1142:
1135:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1106:the candidates
1069:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1056:
996:
989:
988:
986:
980:
934:
930:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
899:
898:
897:
896:
873:
872:
841:
838:
818:
815:
814:
813:
779:
776:
775:
774:
740:
737:
736:
735:
696:
693:
662:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
635:Thanks. ;-) --
574:
566:
565:
564:
563:
519:
480:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
448:
447:
446:
445:
381:
378:
377:
376:
324:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
302:
301:
272:
266:
265:
264:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
195:
194:
193:
192:
157:
156:
118:
115:
114:
113:
57:
56:
51:
46:
41:
36:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1213:
1204:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1139:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1066:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1003:
1002:
993:
984:
981:
979:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
929:
926:
918:
914:
910:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
895:
891:
887:
882:
877:
876:
875:
874:
871:
867:
863:
858:
857:
856:
855:
851:
847:
839:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
799:
798:
797:
793:
789:
785:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
760:
759:
758:
754:
750:
749:PaulTanenbaum
746:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
721:
720:
719:
716:
715:
710:
706:
702:
694:
692:
691:
687:
683:
679:
674:
673:
670:
660:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
628:
623:
621:
613:
612:
611:
608:
603:
601:
595:
590:
589:
588:
584:
580:
575:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
562:
559:
554:
552:
546:
542:
538:
537:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
518:
514:
510:
505:
504:
503:
502:
499:
494:
492:
486:
478:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
444:
441:
435:
431:
426:
425:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
395:
391:
387:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
334:
330:
322:
316:
313:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
300:
296:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
278:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
230:
229:
222:
214:
210:
206:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
191:
187:
183:
179:
174:
169:
165:
161:
160:
159:
158:
155:
151:
147:
143:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
98:
97:
93:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
16:
1202:
1182:
1176:
1153:
1145:
1143:
1109:
1103:
1080:
1072:
1070:
1036:
1030:
1007:
999:
997:
932:
843:
820:
781:
742:
714:Black Falcon
712:
698:
675:
664:
619:
599:
593:
550:
540:
490:
482:
433:
393:
383:
344:Eugenes Lair
338:— Preceding
332:
326:
274:
231:
226:
120:
81:my talk page
79:, ask me on
58:
20:
1184:voting page
1111:voting page
676:(copied to
668:Dr. Blofeld
380:Ptbotgourou
333:translation
71:using four
1168:topic bans
1095:topic bans
1022:topic bans
953:topic bans
439:Talk to me
399:Talk to me
85:{{helpme}}
61:Wikipedian
1164:site bans
1091:site bans
1018:site bans
949:site bans
788:W Nowicki
329:sugarloaf
270:Flowchart
235:Nic Roets
131:Debresser
63:! Please
827:Nicholsr
430:GdGourou
390:GdGourou
352:contribs
340:unsigned
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
1203:delete
886:S. Rich
846:S. Rich
362:article
182:Alarics
23:welcome
939:. The
909:EnOreg
862:EnOreg
803:EnOreg
764:EnOreg
725:EnOreg
682:EnOreg
637:EnOreg
626:(talk)
606:(talk)
579:EnOreg
557:(talk)
527:EnOreg
509:EnOreg
497:(talk)
461:EnOreg
414:EnOreg
366:EnOreg
291:EnOreg
254:EnOreg
205:EnOreg
146:EnOreg
103:EnOreg
73:tildes
1193:talk
1154:The
1120:talk
1081:The
1047:talk
1008:The
973:talk
913:talk
890:talk
866:talk
850:talk
831:talk
807:talk
792:talk
768:talk
753:talk
729:talk
709:here
707:(as
701:here
686:talk
641:talk
620:Tony
600:Tony
594:know
583:talk
551:Tony
531:talk
513:talk
491:Tony
465:talk
418:talk
370:talk
348:talk
295:talk
258:talk
239:talk
209:talk
186:talk
150:talk
135:talk
107:talk
65:sign
933:Hi,
541:you
434:°o°
394:°o°
386:BOT
121:On
1195:)
1187:.
1166:,
1122:)
1114:.
1093:,
1049:)
1041:.
1020:,
975:)
951:,
915:)
907:--
892:)
868:)
852:)
833:)
809:)
794:)
770:)
755:)
747:.—
731:)
688:)
643:)
585:)
577:--
533:)
525:--
515:)
507:--
467:)
436:-
432:-
424:)
420:)
396:-
392:-
372:)
354:)
350:•
297:)
289:--
260:)
241:)
211:)
188:)
152:)
137:)
109:)
1191:(
1118:(
1045:(
971:(
911:(
888:(
864:(
848:(
829:(
805:(
790:(
766:(
751:(
727:(
684:(
639:(
581:(
529:(
511:(
463:(
416:(
368:(
346:(
293:(
256:(
237:(
207:(
184:(
148:(
133:(
105:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.