620:
including the OED, disagree that Farsi should be considered a deprecated term in the
English language. It seems to bethe case that you personally find the word Farsi to be distasteful in an english context - althpugh there is nothing inherently wrong with using the word. In my view this is a case similar to changing date formatting from BC to CE because of personal preferences - when according to the MOS, one should follow the dating system used by the mai contributor to an article. Establishing an account only to change the term Farsi to Persian because of a personal preference is disruptive to the establishment of consensus which is the basic wikipedia operating principle. When the editors who deal with farsi/persian language have established a consensus to disallow the use of the word Farsi - then blanket changes, like the nes you are undertaking can be made - not before.
545:. You may disagree with it but it is official. We can of course put it into discussion, but after all we should accept the fact that the word "Farsi" should NOT be used in English text, as it is officially decided. You may not be aware of the history, but the whole thing started less than 30 years ago. That means until late 70's the word "Farsi" was not part of English vocabulary. The fact that some people started using that and made it popular does not make it right. It should be actively corrected. Even if some people search for the word "Farsi," we should redirect them to the correct source, instead of trying to facilitate their search. I hope the issue is clearer now.
734:
or most common name – any names of languages, that are also more or less widely used and that are likely to be heard, regardless of its political correctness. Your counterexample of "Suomi" doesn't work, because "Suomi" isn't used in
English (or German, French, etc.), but "Farsi" is (though, not as commonly as "Persian"). A better comparison would be "Sakha" vs. "Yakut". People searching the list for Farsi should be able to find it. Furthermore, this is not an English text, but a list of languages, along with their alternative names, if they should be used ot not. So your claims are clearly invalid for this very article. Please accept that. —
541:. I understand your points. My effort in editing the texts does not meant to disrupt wikipedia. For your information, I did not use any automated tool! I did it manually. It is a hard thing to do but I considered it important enough to do so. In addition, automated tools are prone to mistakes. While I tried to evaluate every text to find out in which context the word should be replaced and in which one not. Clearly my judgment is different from yours, but it does not make me wrong, and does not make you right as well. In fact, it is not about me being justified or not, it is an official decision from
1060:, which just means that we use the language that actually exists, rather than trying to set standards. The fact is that, as multiple people are telling you here, the terms "Persian" and "Farsi" are both used in English to refer to the same modern language. Hence, both are acceptable on English Knowledge (XXG). Further, to repeat what Geo Swan has said, changing direct quotations is wrong, and changing the terms used in particular referenced material is bad. Neither should be done.
641:, I don't speak (and cannot read) the language in question; most English speakers cannot. That particular article has a history of low-quality edits, which is one reason I jumped on it so quickly and reverted the entire thing. I realize that most of the foreign language terms in the article don't have referencing, but I'd appreciate it if you provided referencing for your version of the text. If you do so, I have no problem whatsoever with that part of your edit.
753:. I did all the changes manually in order to have a good judgment for every article separately. Clearly my point of view is different from some other users. I still think that my example of "Suomi" versus "Finnish" is valid. The fact that something is common does not make it right. What if some people start using Suomi now and make it popular? After 20 or 30 years, should we accept that name to enter official texts? I do not think so.
775:(a Turkic language from Siberia), which used to be called "Yakut" (German: Jakutisch) for quite a while, but as the speaker prefer to have their own name used, "Sakha" in this case, this has gained wider use now and has even become official. Linguistic works call the language "Sakha" almost exclusively now. If something like this happens to "Finnish/Suomi", then okay, then "Suomi" should also be included in that particular list. —
589:. The phrase "جنگ داخلی امریک" is not correct. The correct phrase is "جنگ داخلی آمریکا." I hope that you see the extra character at the end, and the change in the other character. I kindly asked you not change the Persian phrase in case you decide to undo my edits. I understand that you may not agree with me, but please accept the fact that my knowledge of Persian language is better than yours. Thank you for your understanding.
678:. I would like to add that I did not established my account solely to change this particular term. It is evident from the date that the account is made and the dates of the edits. It just happened that I am interested to this topic (besides many other topics). If you see few contribution of mine in Knowledge (XXG) English is just because I contribute more in Knowledge (XXG) Persian (whenever I have time).
690:, and point of view of OED and other references, enough to perform the changes. Apparently it is not the case for Knowledge (XXG), although it is for me. I hope the editor establishes a consensus soon. Let me also add this, as my personal point of view, that the consensus should not be based on what the majority of Knowledge (XXG) users prefer, but rather what scientifically is evaluated and published.
685:
I made systematic changes simply because there were systematic inconsistencies, and you appreciate that more than 95% of my edits were justified. The discussion is just about some disagreements on less than 5% of those. I do, however, agree with you that the editor should have established a consensus
733:
article. I agree with you (and that
Persian Academy) that "Farsi" is to be avoided in English (and German, French, etc.) texts. And I also switched to saying "Persian" quite some time ago, as do my colleagues in Linguistics. But this is a different case here. The article lists – next to the official
636:
With regard to the communication you had with dbachmann (dab) above, I probably should have said "informed" rather than "warned"; there was no need to say more than that. My point is that you did have information about this issue on
Knowledge (XXG) before you made your mass edits. With regard to the
797:
I think we just have different point of views. I think the decisions is not always based on what the majority of people prefer, but rather what scientifically is evaluated and published. We do also see it is social behaviors in a society. If a certain pattern is common, it is not always considered
681:
In fact, it is not a matter of personal preference, but a matter of consistency in individual articles and throughout the encyclopedia. One may use Farsi in place of
Persian throughout a particular text or in a systematic fashion throughout the encyclopedia, but from an editorial point of view one
592:
Last, but not least, I see no justification to use the word "Farsi" in this particular article. The article is not about the names of the languages, and other languages are stated by their
English names. The word "Farsi" is used as stand alone, without the name "Persian" beside it. I appreciate if
577:
put a comment here in
November last year and I answered to that in December. By that time I have not done any edits in Knowledge (XXG) yet in that regard. One can simply check that in the history of my contributions. I sincerely hope that it is not a norm in Knowledge (XXG) community to consider a
1188:
Hello and thank you for your suggestion of WikiTimeLine for en.wikipedia.org and fa.wikipedia.org. Yes, I am the author and I have already replied at bugzilla. I will give you and the people and wikimedia my full support and hope I can be of enough help to get WikiTimeLine (or better said: an
1112:
In the late 70s and early 80s, the word "Farsi" was introduced into the
English vocabulary by some non-native English-speakers, who, themselves, were unaware of the name of their mother tongue in a foreign language. If you deny the authority of an authorized party to introduce the name of the
1015:". I mean that if a pattern is happening in systematic way (not randomly), there is always a scientific reason behind that. In general, you are right arguing that the "scientific reason" may or may not be justified, but in this particular case the scientific reason is the announcement of the
619:
When I talk about disrupting wikipedia to make a point I talk about the fact that almost all of your edits are devoted to change the term farsi to persian in any article where you find the term. This you do without prior discussion or establishment of consensus - even though several editors,
409:
Yes, if you do a 1-second Google-Scholar Search, you will find number of papers using "Farsi," and you will find even more of them if you repeat your search over time. The fact is that at the time of the pronouncement, the word "Farsi" had never been used in any research papaer or university
507:
Using an automated tool to change the text of many articles without prior discussion, and then using an automated tool to revert edits by people who disagreed with your changes, is disruptive regardless of what the change is. However, the fact is that "Farsi" versus "Persian" is a long-term
1109:). Having said that, one may argue why Knowledge (XXG) does not follow prescriptivism. Although there are controversies, you surely know that prescriptivism is generally acceptable in education and in publishing. Knowledge (XXG), like any other encyclopedia, falls into this category.
356:
1) "Persian" has been used in a variety of publications including cultural, scientific and diplomatic documents for centuries and, therefore, it carries a very significant historical and cultural meaning. Hence, changing "Persian" to "Farsi" would negate this established important
147:
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. –
897:. You mentioned a very important point. The fact that every couple of months someone changes Farsi to Persian means that there is an official/scientific reason behind it. It is not just personal point of views. Although many users may disagree, the official decision remains valid.
682:
may not use
Persian in most of the occasions and suddenly use Farsi in the next sentence. This will confuse the reader more than giving him more information. It is at least wise to use Persian as the official name and use Farsi in brackets beside it only if necessary.
1105:" (implying that no party is authoritative with respect to the English language) is not justified. No doubt authorized parties do exist for many languages, including English (you will find some references about that in the section "Authorities" in the article
344:
The
Academy of the Persian Language and Literature has delivered a pronouncement on the English name of Persian language and rejected any usage of the word "Farsi" instead of Persian/Persa/Persane/Persisch in the Western languages. The announcement
223:
1984 Bull. British Soc. Middle Eastern Studies XI. 123 It may still not be too late to put an end to the grotesque affectation of applying the name ‘Farsi’ to the language which for more than five hundred years has been known to English-speakers as
390:
4) The word "Farsi" has never been used in any research paper or university document in any Western language, and the proposal to begin using it would create doubt and ambiguity about the name of the official language of Iran
945:
In general, we should have our usage reflect the usage in our source documents. Our sources are supposed to be verifiable and authoritiative. If they use Farsi what possible justification would we have to over-ride their
454:
considered disruptive, and can result in a block to stop the disruption. I see above that you have warned about this even some months ago, so you cannot be unaware that others consider this editing disruptive. Please stop.
317:, I must say that the word is currently in use in English language (no doubt!), and, therefore, appears in the dictionaries. However, the official organization that can make a decision if this usage is justified or not is
410:
document. Over time, due to unawareness of the scholars, the word is started to be used, and will be used more and more as far as the ignorance exists. My aim is to spread the knowledge and speed this process down.
902:
I tried to judge every change based on the context, and therefore I did not use any automated tool. I do not know which quoted material you are talking about. If you please let me know I may correct it. Thank you.
1224:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1055:
might be the highest authority with regard to Farsi/Persian, it is not authoritative with respect to the English language (nor is anyone else). Knowledge (XXG) follows major reference works in practicing
306:
to distinguish it from other forms of Greek languages. This distinction, if necessary, can be directly pointed out in the text or in the speech, and we don't need to start using a different name for that.
508:
contentious issue, so unilateral attempts to change the whole wiki without prior discussion are particularly bad. The fact that the user (or you) believes he is justified does not make it justified.
701:. Dictionaries normally provide no translations for phrases, but for words. However, if you will be so kind to undo your undid on my edits, I will definitely provide more information for that part.
875:
I am not aware of any wiki policy to back up this wholescale change. But, even if there were a policy to back it up, it would remain a mistake to make this change in quoted material.
403:
936:
I am going to consider wikipedia policy decisions "official". I am going to need a lot of convincing that policy decisions of other bodies should be considered "official" here.
1113:
language into English, how do you approve the authority of those ignorant non-native speakers to do so? Please remember that I am talking from a prescriptive point of view.
379:
3) Changing the usage may also give the impression that Farsi is a dialect used in some parts of Iran rather than the predominant (and official) language of the country.
368:
2) Changing the usage from "Persian" to "Farsi" may give the impression that Farsi is a new language, although this may well be the intention of some users of Farsi.
119:
771:
In fact I do think so, yes. If suddenly for any reason, "Suomi" is widely used, then it should indeed be listed as an alternative. Something similar happened with
1052:
1016:
687:
542:
399:
320:
25:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
402:. Their last point is ludicrous, and quickly dispelled by a 1-second Google-Scholar Search, that shows thousands of scholarly papers using "Farsi".
844:; Most probably you "always have done" that simply because you consider Persia and Iran two different entities, while, in fact, they are not.
75:
985:
It's clearly not Orignal Research, as Fakhredinblog referred to that Persian Academy Citation, of which the content is even included in the
1249:
477:" as this is indeed to be preferred. However, not in all cases should it remain the only name (see my comment below). Changing "Farsi" to "
959:"Persian" is correct, and "Farsi" is incorrect, how would you answer the challenge that this is a violation of the policy proscribing "
178:
as an English word. The problem is that "Persian" is ambiguous because of its associations with ancient Persia, i.e. it may refer to
49:
1245:
107:
34:
68:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
698:
638:
582:
1236:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
54:
1241:
473:
Is this about the Farsi issue? I have to say I agree with Fakhredinblog in changing most instances of "Farsi" into "
450:
I agree with the user above. In particular, blanket, high-speed reverting of people who disagree with your changes
434:). If you do not stop disrupting the work of wikipedia to make your point you may face administrative consequences.
405:
Is anyone surprised that an institution with the word "Persian" in its title would privilege this usage? *sheesh*
730:
486:
314:
153:
92:
29:
22:
1116:
In regard to the issue of direct quotations, I will shortly start a new section to explain it in more details.
61:
1106:
1098:
1094:
1057:
230:
171:
921:
No. I do not accept that since someone comes along and tries to change every instance of Farsi to Persian
65:
118:
1237:
69:
1067:
648:
515:
462:
125:
927:
I could as easily suggest that since they end up getting changed back makes the other usage "official".
44:
830:
218:", and any number of other languages. To be fair, however, the OED also cites opposition to "Farsi",
149:
88:
1213:
1204:
242:
137:
1233:
1217:
1194:
1161:
1157:
1117:
1026:
968:
904:
883:
845:
799:
754:
702:
594:
546:
411:
330:
431:
190:
etc. is a bit disingenious, since these are not in actual use. "Farsi" has a status similar to "
697:. It is still not clear to me what kind of references you would like to have in the article of
430:
Your recent edits seem to be a clear cut example of disrupting wikipedia to make a point (see
129:
111:
1229:
1221:
573:. Firstly, the statement "you have warned about this even some months ago" is not true! User
1153:
1063:
994:
986:
780:
739:
694:
644:
624:
586:
570:
538:
511:
494:
478:
474:
458:
438:
295:
267:
259:
141:
1232:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1225:
1025:" in every matter related to Persian language, and there is no official party above that.
841:
826:
960:
686:
beforehand. I am sorry for my ignorance in that regard. I considered the announcement of
84:
772:
574:
283:
255:
238:
183:
1190:
1149:
964:
894:
879:
864:
Every couple of months someone comes along and decides to change every reference to
275:
39:
303:
287:
990:
776:
750:
735:
675:
621:
534:
490:
435:
279:
263:
179:
878:
You have been making this change in quoted material. Please be more careful.
989:
article itself, basically. A Knowledge (XXG) suggestion is also "Be Bold!". —
1253:
1198:
1169:
1125:
1072:
1034:
998:
972:
912:
887:
853:
834:
825:
to mean the people/culture of Persia. Always have done, and won't change. —
807:
784:
762:
743:
710:
653:
631:
602:
554:
520:
498:
467:
445:
419:
338:
246:
157:
133:
96:
1220:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
869:
329:
in Western languages. I attach the document here for more information.
234:
215:
203:
481:" can only be called disruptive if there are clear reasons to include
207:
199:
325:
In a pronouncement, the Academy has clearly rejected using the word
174:
that does see use in English language sources, and is listed in the
865:
271:
270:. In this sense, the name of the language is very much similar to
211:
191:
167:
237:
otoh is a little ambiguous, but alright if the context is clear.
195:
175:
72:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
924:"means there is an official/scientific reason behind it."
80:
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
186:
just as much as Modern Persian. Your comparison with
1212:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
258:for your message. I understand why you feel that
114:" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
1189:improved version of it) to run on wikipedia.
798:right, and efforts are made to correct that.
229:and I do not insist on using "Farsi" at all,
8:
1156:, I added a section to my user page called "
140:of users who are watching that article. See
1158:Direct quotations and Translated quotations
1053:Academy of Persian Language and Literature
1017:Academy of Persian Language and Literature
729:This is about the changes you made to the
321:Academy of Persian Language and Literature
60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
262:is a bit "ambiguous," as it may refer to
124:The text written here will appear on the
1003:My emphasis in that sentence was not on
821:to describe the language of Iran, and
693:I also appreciate your clarification
569:I need to mention two extra point to
144:for full information on this feature.
108:editing an article on Knowledge (XXG)
7:
593:you can clarify your justification.
30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
14:
1238:review the candidates' statements
674:Thank you for your clarification
117:
110:there is a small field labeled "
1097:is undeniable. However, from a
398:Thank you for quoting from the
1244:. For the Election committee,
1214:Arbitration Committee election
1205:ArbCom elections are now open!
578:simple discussion a "warning."
1:
1254:17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1093:Importance and usefulness of
699:Naming the American Civil War
639:Naming the American Civil War
583:Naming the American Civil War
247:16:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
581:Secondly, about the article
420:14:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
339:15:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
50:How to write a great article
1240:and submit your choices on
233:is perfectly correct; just
1269:
1246:MediaWiki message delivery
1099:prescriptive point of view
585:, I guess you do not know
21:Hello, Fakhredinblog, and
1199:09:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
1126:16:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
1073:15:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1035:22:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
999:13:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
973:07:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
913:23:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
888:21:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
808:06:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
785:09:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
763:23:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
744:18:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
731:List of languages by name
711:06:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
654:16:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
632:01:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
603:23:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
555:22:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
521:18:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
499:18:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
487:List of languages by name
468:16:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
446:16:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
315:Oxford English Dictionary
158:14:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
97:15:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
70:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
1170:09:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
1165:
1121:
1030:
908:
854:22:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
849:
835:16:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
803:
758:
706:
598:
550:
415:
170:is a useful synonym for
102:Request for edit summary
1107:Linguistic prescription
1095:descriptive linguistics
1012:"every couple of months
298:is like using the name
231:Modern Persian language
172:Modern Persian language
637:Persian/Farsi text in
83:And don't forget, the
1218:Arbitration Committee
1019:. The Academy is the
860:questionable edits...
432:Knowledge (XXG):POINT
130:page revision history
87:is your friend. :) –
1222:arbitration process
489:), for instance. —
142:m:Help:Edit summary
1234:arbitration policy
1160:" in that matter.
1103:nor is anyone else
1101:, your statement "
1022:"highest authority
274:. It may refer to
35:How to edit a page
961:original research
955:If you think you
725:Persian vs. Farsi
290:. Using the word
245:
163:Farsi vs. Persian
1260:
1071:
1009:" but rather on
987:Persian language
652:
628:
587:Persian language
519:
466:
442:
313:being listed in
241:
121:
79:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1242:the voting page
1208:
1186:
1061:
862:
727:
642:
626:
509:
456:
440:
428:
284:Medieval Greek
165:
150:Oleg Alexandrov
104:
89:Oleg Alexandrov
73:
55:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
1266:
1264:
1211:
1207:
1202:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1114:
1110:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1001:
978:
977:
976:
975:
950:
949:
948:
947:
940:
939:
938:
937:
931:
930:
929:
928:
916:
915:
899:
898:
861:
858:
857:
856:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
790:
789:
788:
787:
766:
765:
726:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
691:
683:
679:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
634:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
590:
579:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
526:
525:
524:
523:
502:
501:
427:
424:
423:
422:
396:
395:
394:
393:
384:
383:
382:
381:
373:
372:
371:
370:
362:
361:
360:
359:
350:
349:
348:
347:
341:
307:
296:Modern Persian
268:Modern Persian
227:
226:
184:Middle Persian
164:
161:
126:Recent changes
103:
100:
66:sign your name
58:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
32:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1265:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1183:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:FakhredinBlog
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:FakhredinBlog
1115:
1111:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1059:
1058:descriptivism
1054:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:FakhredinBlog
1024:
1023:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1008:
1007:
1002:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
952:
951:
944:
943:
942:
941:
935:
934:
933:
932:
926:
925:
920:
919:
918:
917:
914:
910:
906:
905:FakhredinBlog
901:
900:
896:
892:
891:
890:
889:
885:
881:
876:
873:
871:
867:
859:
855:
851:
847:
846:FakhredinBlog
843:
839:
838:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
809:
805:
801:
800:FakhredinBlog
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
768:
767:
764:
760:
756:
755:FakhredinBlog
752:
748:
747:
746:
745:
741:
737:
732:
724:
712:
708:
704:
703:FakhredinBlog
700:
696:
692:
689:
684:
680:
677:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
655:
650:
646:
640:
635:
633:
630:
623:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
604:
600:
596:
595:FakhredinBlog
591:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
556:
552:
548:
547:FakhredinBlog
544:
540:
536:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
522:
517:
513:
506:
505:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
485:names (as in
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
464:
460:
453:
448:
447:
444:
437:
433:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:FakhredinBlog
408:
407:
406:
404:
401:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
380:
377:
376:
375:
374:
369:
366:
365:
364:
363:
358:
354:
353:
352:
351:
346:
342:
340:
336:
332:
331:FakhredinBlog
328:
324:
322:
316:
312:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:Ancient Greek
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
225:
221:
220:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
162:
160:
159:
155:
151:
145:
143:
139:
136:, and in the
135:
131:
128:page, in the
127:
122:
120:
115:
113:
109:
101:
99:
98:
94:
90:
86:
81:
77:
71:
67:
63:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
19:
18:
1209:
1187:
1184:WikiTimeLine
1102:
1021:
1020:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1004:
956:
923:
922:
877:
874:
863:
822:
818:
816:
728:
482:
451:
449:
429:
397:
389:
378:
367:
355:
343:
334:
326:
318:
310:
304:Modern Greek
299:
294:in place of
291:
288:Modern Greek
228:
222:
187:
166:
146:
123:
116:
112:Edit summary
105:
85:edit summary
82:
59:
20:
16:
15:
1154:Gavia immer
1064:Gavia immer
817:FWIW I use
695:Gavia immer
688:the Academy
645:Gavia immer
571:Gavia immer
543:the Academy
539:Gavia immer
512:Gavia immer
459:Gavia immer
302:instead of
280:Koine Greek
266:as well as
264:Old Persian
180:Old Persian
1230:topic bans
1051:While the
749:Thank you
357:precedent.
254:Thank you
138:watchlists
62:Wikipedian
40:Help pages
1226:site bans
134:diff page
132:, on the
64:! Please
1191:ColdCase
1150:Geo Swan
1006:"someone
965:Geo Swan
895:Geo Swan
880:Geo Swan
842:Nicholas
827:Nicholas
676:·Maunus·
622:·Maunus·
535:·Maunus·
436:·Maunus·
224:Persian.
188:français
45:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
870:Persian
823:Persian
479:Persian
475:Persian
426:Warning
300:Helenic
260:Persian
235:Persian
216:Tagalog
204:Bengali
23:welcome
1216:. The
991:N-true
957:"know"
946:usage?
777:N-true
751:N-true
736:N-true
491:N-true
345:reads:
309:About
256:Dieter
208:Telugu
200:Kazakh
76:helpme
1148:Dear
893:Dear
866:Farsi
840:Dear
831:reply
819:Farsi
773:Yakut
533:Dear
327:Farsi
311:Farsi
292:Farsi
286:, or
272:Greek
212:Hausa
192:Hindi
168:Farsi
106:When
1250:talk
1195:talk
1166:talk
1152:and
1122:talk
1068:talk
1031:talk
995:talk
969:talk
963:"?
909:talk
884:talk
850:talk
833:) @
804:talk
781:talk
759:talk
740:talk
707:talk
649:talk
599:talk
551:talk
537:and
516:talk
495:talk
483:both
463:talk
416:talk
400:APLL
335:talk
319:The
243:(𒁳)
214:", "
210:", "
206:", "
202:", "
198:", "
196:Urdu
194:", "
154:talk
93:talk
1210:Hi,
868:to
575:dab
239:dab
182:or
176:OED
1252:)
1228:,
1197:)
1168:)
1124:)
1062:—
1033:)
997:)
971:)
911:)
886:)
872:.
852:)
806:)
783:)
761:)
742:)
709:)
643:—
601:)
553:)
510:—
497:)
457:—
452:is
418:)
337:)
282:,
278:,
156:)
95:)
78:}}
74:{{
1248:(
1193:(
1164:(
1120:(
1070:)
1066:(
1029:(
993:(
967:(
907:(
882:(
848:(
829:(
802:(
779:(
757:(
738:(
705:(
651:)
647:(
629:·
627:ƛ
625:·
597:(
549:(
518:)
514:(
493:(
465:)
461:(
443:·
441:ƛ
439:·
414:(
391:.
333:(
323:.
152:(
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
