User talk:Feudonym - Knowledge (XXG)

399:

to do!... Our mistake, I guess. That's why they passed by me!... How could I know? If there is no rule to determine if titles of episodes are to be added, and if they're so rarelly added because of the rubbished job of many editors, how can one know there was a rule for it? Since I've never seen anyone else correcting this kind of stuff, either the tiles or the listing of episodes, if I've almost allways seen them the way I put them and only one or two people complainting without even saying why, if everybody else I've seen do it that way too, it was to be assumed it to be a personal chriteria or a preference rather than an absolute rule, specially since most of people don't even invoke the Manual of Style, and when someone actually does it we barely notice. They should've got another title, rules instead of guidelines. And because it looks awful and there is no distinction between shows and episodes nor any reason to distinguish them. Unless they've changed it at some point, like they (who?, who rules this?) did with dates!... It's harder to read, specially for people who have a hard time to do it. When one starts reading will probably prefer to read the latest works first and then go to the past, I never thought up you had so many uptight rules, how could I even think I couldn't pass without reading them? I knew there were some rules, I generally write as I see it being done, but the absence of information concerning things like titles of episodes make me assume a wrong way of displaying them, and I never thought they had rules for such petty and infime details!... It's not like I don't like rules, I just don't assume there are rules for everything, and that they're more abstract than they actually are, since other kind of rules, such as the rules about notability and sourcing are much more abstract than these, the reason why I supposed they were abstract too, and above that, mere indications. That's why I didn't even get the trouble of reading, since I was previously assuming that you were interpreting an abstract guideline rather than imposing an actual absolute rule. I know now that I was mistaken.

542:. Firstly, piping should usually be avoided on dab pages, and should only be used to format titles, while keeping any disambiguating phrases like (film) or (song) visible. Secondly, entries should generally only be added if there is an existing article with an ambiguous title (e.g., if the Killers song you added had its own article). Red links (articles which don't yet exist) may sometimes be included, but only if they are likely to be created in the future (typically, this means that multiple articles link to the nonexistent article. You can check this by clicking on the redlink and then clicking the "what links here" link.) — 1509:, but short version: it is--understandably--hyper-sensitive about even the hint of plagiarism, let alone anything as blatant as what you've been doing, and thus the directive on encountering same is instant removal. (Doesn't help that blurbs of this type by their nature take a highly promotional, informal tone that's inappropriate for any encyclopedia entry.) Simply leaving the material in place on the assumption that "Ehhh, somebody'll come along and rewrite it" just isn't going to cut it, I'm afraid. If you're that anxious to fill in the gap, you're going to have to put it in your own words--not, 1431: 460:

often correspond to minor edits or to self-explanatory ones. Since I didn't knew they were referred to actual rules - per MOS is Chinese to me and I didn't even read what the hell was it - I never justified my unedits, and for that very reason I never "learned" before to accept what I thought to be a personal preference as the actual rule, but I do now!... I just ask, please, not to alter rules so frequently as they're doing here!...

2809: 1078: 2950: 2721: 2599: 2336: 2248: 2116: 1949: 1831: 339:. There's alot of Queens of the Stone Age-related articles on Knowledge (XXG) that could use a little attention, and I hope this taskforce can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this taskforce off the ground and a few Queens of the Stone Age pages into the front ranks of Knowledge (XXG) articles. Thanks! -- 679: 2488: 2421: 1785: 2575: 1563: 1253: 617: 1326:"In March 2012, during a series of UK press interviews, a number of former staff members, including some of its presenters announced that they had retained a high profile firm of media lawyers and were joining forces to issue a number of both high court and county court proceedings against the owner of Vintage TV." 438:

Hi, just thought I'd add that I admire your level-headedness and politeness when dealing with GM-Cupertino. I seem to have had the same issues as you with him, and it's all the more frustrating as he(?) doesn't seem to leave any edit summaries, nor explain why he undoes any of my edits, especially as

418:

I've looked upon other articles in order to make mine because since so many people are so quick in altering the smallest mistakes I assumed that, despite knowing that Administrators and Editors don't allways have the time to correct everything everywhere, someone would have corrected it at some point

260:

Hello! I'm curious why you arbitrarily changed some but not all of the awards and nominations listed to bold face print. If you intended the bold faced names to represent winners and the remainder to represent nominees, there was no explanation alerting readers to this fact. I have reverted it to the

180:

In a recent edit, you called Betacommand a 'piece of shit'. Just because you used an acronym doesn't change the fact that it's a personal attack, incivil, and has no place on this project. I understand that you're frustrated, but that's an unacceptable way to respond. Please use better judgment in

2836:

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee.

2454:

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Knowledge (XXG) articles

893:

that makes it clear that no particular generation needs to be illustrated in the top infobox. Note that that infobox lists production as 2000-2006 and 2010-present -- that means that anything in that time span is appropriate for that infobox. In other words, the Knowledge (XXG) article is about the

507:

About the linking of common English words: when it comes to a film or television character without a name it is most likely that a page about that character won't ever be created for lack of notability. However, the linking of common English words that define that character will allow to illustrate

398:

I ignore them because guidelines are just that, mere guidelines, they're not absolute rules. At least is how I understand the meaning of the word guidelines. And beside, who would ever read all that, such a long list of mere recomendations? Certainly neither of us, and others, who have other things

459:

I did read the summaries, I just didn't read the indications like per MOS. When I saw them, and since I don't have the time to check it out, I assumed it was something else rather than the mention to the Manual of Style or anything else. As I said once before, I don't write summaries because they

2499:. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 585:

allows for linking to sections within articles: "If a topic does not have an article of its own, but is mentioned within another article, then a link can be included to that article...It is often useful to link to the relevant section of that page (using the #anchor notation) and conceal that by

286:

job cleaning up the Daytime Serials section, I didn't want to delete it, but do you agree it's a little confusing? I can't tell who won and who was a nominee. And I don't think it makes sense to include just two years, in two different formats, one detailed, the other just a list of titles. As I

482:

Hey, you were the first to use capital letters, I used them to answer that in an ironic way!... By the way, my English is better on longer texts because I'm not good on smaller talk, thank you very much!... Beside, your justifications to edits were so far behind the dozens of other edits that I

310:

for all articles I have created or extensively edited, and nobody has commented about the format, so I suspect it's not a major issue with most people who contribute to film articles. I've seen all the formats you've mentioned and found some confusing, others OK. I think if a first-time user of

1961:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2128:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

378:

Thanks! Believe me, the lack of edit summaries, ignoring my summaries, etc has been aggravating me too. But to be fair, you've only seen the polite posts to talk pages and such. You haven't seen the cursing and teeth grinding that has been going on in front of my computer. :)

358:

The italicized dates aren't dates per se, but indications of the name of a given episode of the show. Since these kind of shows' episodes have no name, they have a specific date that works as a title. The rest, titles of shows are perfectly italicizable!...

1843:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

314:

As far as the Writers Guild Awards, since you agree the separate section for Daytime Serials isn't necessary, I'm going to remove it. I didn't want to do so without getting your feedback since you worked so hard on it. Thanks again for writing!

287:

commented on the talk page, there was too much emphasis on soap operas in the original article; what's there now even seems to be more than necessary. Do you think the section should be removed entirely? I did delete the section devoted to

1474:

i am sorry for my reversions in this player's article, now i'll "defend" myself: 1 - i thought that after mentioning "goal" a few inches to the left, we wouldn't need the word again; 2 - i try not to overuse in the comma department.

508:

the page and the information over the film or show. It's not like I've ever linked most of those words outside that context. Except, of course, for such words as professions which apparently are absurdly seen as non relevant!...

620:

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a

1329:

What does it mean? what presenters? this is a great channel and i love it. I've checked with some friends in the press and they don't know anything about it. why don't you identify yourself if this is true? SO verify it!

920:. It would be helpful when you entered a summary of your edits: especially when the diff does not clearly highlight them because they are only added/removed spaces, and the topic is debated as this one. Again, thanks. 2995: 2766: 2642: 2379: 2291: 2156: 1989: 1871: 1541:

which represents a difficult consensus achieved after a long debate about which set of manuals of style to follow in capitalizing the Beatles. Lower case 'the' in running prose is now Knowledge (XXG)'s house style.

1697:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2444: 997:

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

2837:

When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge (XXG)’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Knowledge (XXG) administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

2979:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2750:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2626:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2363:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2275:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2140:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1973:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1855:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 226:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

155:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

113:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

2877: 2964: 2735: 2612: 2349: 2261: 1803: 644:

from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at

419:

in some given article, and if almost no article is altered in a given way, and sometimes is corrected by Administrators who leave the rest as it is, I assume that things are all right.

1438: 2868:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics

962:, a collaboratively edited social news site, which mixes elements of Wikis, social networking, and social news sites. You can get some more information about what we are doing at: 1792: 1778: 306:

Hello, and thanks for your response. Re: awards and nominations, the Knowledge (XXG) Film Project surprisingly has no guidelines re: their format. I adopted the one I used for

1434:

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you havn't listed yourself on the

2447:, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the 1017:

in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

693: 649: 569:

The common standard to determine whether a non-existent article is likely to be created is whether other articles, besides the disambiguation page, link to it. There are

2428:, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Knowledge (XXG) has readers from all over the world, our policy is to 1478:

Obviously, i don't have the idea i speak better than a native speaker of English, so i won't reinstate my version. Sorry for any inconvenience, keep up the good work --

1442: 1302: 1022: 696:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 1105:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

607:. Sorry if you feel that way. I only started the article yesterday evening so that people could add information on events. 03md (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 648:

to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at

442:

Anyway, thankfully I think an admin has gotten through and the article concerned has finally been returned to the correct wikipedia format. Keep up the good work!

1101:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1297:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

2213: 2046: 1916: 1751: 1651: 1183: 552:

Please note that disambiguation pages should only have one navigable link per entry, unlike articles. This is established consensus - you can read more at

1435: 2085: 2072: 1089: 955:

Hey, I noticed that you had recently edited the Park 51 article, and I hoped that you could help out on another collaborative community edited project.

218:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 147:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 105:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 726:

Just so you know, AfD's typically last 7 days; the reason why no one's said anything is probably because the page was not transcluded on the daily log.

291:

nominations, because it seemed to have been added by a rabid fan of the show. It certainly wasn't pertinent to the article. Thanks for your feedback.

230: 223: 159: 152: 117: 110: 25:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

629:

which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Knowledge (XXG) has a feature that allows pages to be

1587: 586:

making it a piped link." These links are helpful, because the target has actual content on the ambiguous term, unlike an album track listing. —

214: 234: 163: 121: 2209: 2042: 1912: 1747: 1647: 3018: 2789: 2665: 2401: 2313: 2170: 2003: 1885: 1722: 789: 222:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

151:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

109:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

968:

Basically, we want to get good coverage on news stories, collaboratively edited, like Knowledge (XXG). We are trying to take the ideas of

1807: 336: 2199: 604: 2032: 1294: 889:

This was a topic of extended discussion at WikiProject Autos, and we ended up formally adding text to the infobox image standards at

667: 751: 1001:

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (

2187: 311:

Knowledge (XXG) looks at the way I've listed them, there will be no question as to which were nominations and which were winners.

229:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

158:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

116:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

49: 3014: 2785: 2661: 2397: 2309: 2166: 2020: 1999: 1881: 1718: 1231: 1211: 1196: 823: 2988: 2759: 2635: 2372: 2284: 2149: 1982: 1864: 636:

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the

34: 1909:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1744:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1644:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1383: 276: 1093:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

1346: 1261: 203:

Images were deleted even though I added two sets of lengthy fair use rationales for each. (also pos could mean anything :)

1106: 826:

article. As an editor who was recently involved in these issues you are invited to contribute your thoughts on that page

578: 219: 148: 106: 1362:

Please note, I have undone your change of "backup dancer" to "back-up dancer". This was done for a few reasons: first,

1274: 2456: 2429: 1709:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

689: 645: 54: 3000: 2914: 2771: 2647: 2522: 2384: 2296: 2195: 2161: 1994: 1876: 1714: 917: 344: 2028: 1901:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1736:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1636:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1227: 1207: 1192: 816: 692:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 513: 488: 465: 424: 404: 364: 439:

they're mostly against Knowledge (XXG) policy anyway, and I've even kindly but specifically asked him to do so.

29: 22: 1483: 657: 242: 2976: 2747: 2623: 2360: 2272: 2137: 1970: 1852: 61: 1298: 1290: 1811: 1579: 1412: 1269: 835: 711: 2203: 2036: 1334: 143: 65: 2884: 2518: 1622: 1479: 764: 340: 320: 296: 266: 2873: 2464: 1710: 574: 69: 2542: 2096: 1547: 1053: 641: 44: 854:

edit as the reference definitely quotes Will Butler. Please don't introduce factual errors. Thanks, --

2186:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2019:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1002: 509: 484: 461: 420: 400: 360: 101: 2958: 2729: 2606: 2435:

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use

2343: 2255: 2124: 1957: 1839: 1821: 1798: 1686: 1677: 1538: 1189:

I would be interested to know what it is, that you don't like about my naming "the lead", Prologue?

570: 2472: 2460: 1038: 975:

I hope you check us out -- and feel free to contact me with any questions, comments, or concerns.

803: 653: 238: 167: 125: 2972: 2743: 2619: 2356: 2268: 2133: 1966: 1848: 1706: 1690: 1363: 1338: 1098: 1009:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 890: 795:

What do you thank about this? The intro to the article will be place under 2009 to his main page!

553: 2899: 1902: 1737: 1522: 1408: 1371: 1265: 1264:

with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going

1061: 830: 731: 705: 637: 193: 84: 2821: 1006: 640:

at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a

1400: 897:

Also, it's almost never helpful to have the same photo appear twice at the expense of another.

2933: 2704: 2557: 2492: 2229: 2062: 2024: 1932: 1767: 1667: 1618: 1567: 1430: 1342: 1172: 1159: 827: 759: 758:

for the article? This could be a great opportunity to improve his article's quality. Cheers.--

626: 316: 292: 262: 2984: 2755: 2631: 2368: 2280: 2145: 1978: 1860: 1702: 1694: 1506: 1102: 3007: 2778: 2654: 2538: 2440: 2391: 2303: 2089: 1543: 1451: 1077: 983: 940: 925: 386: 2987:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2980: 2758:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2751: 2634:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2627: 2371:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2364: 2283:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2276: 2148:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2141: 1981:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1974: 1863:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1856: 1705:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1698: 1574:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

1224:

Not at all. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! All the best from the UK for 2012 from,

1122:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a 1119: 483:

didn't even notice who the hell did them, if it was the same person, and much less why!...

182: 2436: 1592: 1155: 1125: 902: 874: 859: 685: 671: 253: 1094: 2206:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2039:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2468: 1610: 1495: 1034: 1030: 798: 755: 2808: 2895: 2580: 2503: 2220:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2053:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1923:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1758:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1741: 1658:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1514: 1378: 1367: 1257: 1245: 1057: 727: 622: 443: 186: 77: 39: 1133:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

1026:

involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

2929: 2925: 2880:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the 2700: 2696: 2685: 2553: 2549: 2225: 2221: 2080: 2058: 2054: 1928: 1924: 1906: 1763: 1759: 1663: 1659: 1513:, a slightly rejiggered version of a press release's words--to begin with. Thanks, 1168: 2949: 2720: 2598: 2335: 2247: 2115: 1948: 1830: 2825:. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and 2425: 1447: 979: 936: 921: 381: 678: 1637: 1609:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

1465: 1306: 898: 870: 855: 581:, because the redirect has no other links to it. As far as the other entries, 2918: 1013:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to 972:-- to make news less biased and speedier (unlike something like Wikinews). 780: 587: 557: 543: 2861:

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

1029:

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

1784: 2689: 969: 869:

Heh no problem. It doesn't help that they have such similar names too! --

535: 528: 2991:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2762:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2638:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2420: 2375:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2287:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2152:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1985:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1867:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1252: 616: 2968:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2817:

gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them

2739:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2616:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2353:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2265:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1693:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1399:

I think at present either way is fine. If over time there are a lot of

993:

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

743: 539: 282:

Hello again! I just added data to this article. Because you did such a

208:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Kinks-Ultimate collection.jpg

3022: 2937: 2903: 2793: 2708: 2669: 2584: 2561: 2526: 2511: 2476: 2405: 2317: 2233: 2174: 2103: 2066: 2007: 1936: 1889: 1815: 1783: 1771: 1726: 1671: 1626: 1551: 1527: 1487: 1455: 1416: 1389: 1350: 1313: 1279: 1235: 1215: 1200: 1176: 1065: 1042: 987: 944: 929: 906: 878: 863: 840: 810: 783: 769: 735: 720: 661: 590: 560: 546: 517: 492: 469: 451: 428: 408: 388: 368: 348: 324: 300: 270: 261:

way it was, since there was no confusion with that format. Thank you.

246: 197: 170: 128: 86: 1641: 700: 534:

I have reverted several changes you made to the disambiguation page

1802:

with another article. If you are interested, please participate in

699:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

2439:. For something related to the United States in the same way, use 2191: 1071:

Orphaned non-free image File:Elvis Perkins Ash Wednesday Cover.jpg

582: 3004:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2913:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2775:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2684:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2651:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2571:

Thanks for correcting my edit – I completely misread your diff.

2537:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2388:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2300:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 963: 2994:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

2962:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

2765:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

2733:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2641:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2378:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2290:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2155:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1988:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1870:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1140:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

2610:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2347:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

1441:

page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the

1268:, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 72:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 1154:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

1323:

I've seen this paragraph being added to Vintage TV's entry:

1076: 2502:

Agreed - thanks for pointing out and will do so in future.

2491:

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an

1305:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1206:

Thank you for your prompt reply. I understand perfectly.

2459:. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on 335:

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed taskforce

1130:

template, along with your question, beneath this message.

76:

after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --

2259:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1502:...Basically, can you please stop doing it already? :) 2975: