1192:
page themselves, does it normally happen that gradually over time that they are linked to it? For example, one of the
Trustees mentioned on the NBFA page has an article on Knowledge, and the NBFA is mentioned on his page, but it is not a clickable link (because it was written a long time before the NBFA article was). Is it likely that the author of that page will change it, and if so, how would they know that the NBFA page was created? Just curious, if there is a Knowledge page that explains this I would appreciate being directed to it. (
548:
465:
1105:
917:
1335:
really can't see where to input them. For example, if you look at the edit page for
Winston Churchill (previous NBFA chairman) the reference list doesn't appear, just a code which says something like 'ref list'. I presume this means it is being imported from somewhere else, but am unsure how to get to the list! Oh well, am learning a lot! I appreciate your help as always(
850:
1213:. Type in the name of your article, and this should find all articles where the name is referenced in the body. It will also show several false alarms, articles that use the same words for other reasons. Go through and fix them to link in your new one. I did a couple for you, and also did the disambiguation page for the acronym at
1208:
Generally never assume someone else will do something. We are all just volunteers with lives. I consider linking up a new article part of the process (along with the DYK nomination, and fixing any issues that come up in the review, as did in this case). Articles with no links are called "orphans" and
1191:
Thank you
Casliber, that's really interesting to know. It's excellent to see other people running with the article, I think Knowledge is very special in that way. I have a query which it would be great if someone could answer (no rush). When people are mentioned in a Knowledge article and they have a
645:
It would be a real shame to have to remove this article after the work that has been put into it, but if those are the rules of
Knowledge of course I respect them. If you confirm to me that is the case, are there any alternatives that you can suggest? Should I ask someone else on here to write it for
633:
After reading what you wrote I am now unsure how to proceed. I would be happy to change my username as I am the only person using the account. However, I am connected to the organisation. I had believed that the most important two criteria on here when assessing if an article could stand were firstly
1318:
style was the more "modern" so I prefer that, but many older articles have older styles. I also work on both USA and
European/global articles and generally try to use USA style dates in USA articles, etc. Also remember to log in with your new user name before editing to record who is doing what. The
1236:
Thanks W Nowicki, that's really helpful. I assure you that I never expected others to do things for me. I appreciate all the help I have received so far and marvel at the work that
Knowledge contributors do. It's the reason I use the site. It was more just that I don't want to edit too much, because
1020:
I have unblocked you to let you respond to the request for clarification concerning your request for a change of username. I suggest responding as soon as you can to avoid being blocked again. However, you should also be aware that, no matter what username you use, you should generally avoid editing
1290:
Dear W Nowicki- thanks about the explanation concerning the dating. Completely understand about 'currently'. Have removed that word for a start and will bear your comments in mind. I will try to look into the references when I have more time but some of the edit pages for the articles are set up so
784:
to track. You might want to add your new user name to it, for example. The article still could be expanded of course. For example, the "research" needs to be cited, and the count of people, etc. Also the registry page only says
England and Wales, while the text claims Scotland etc. so that needs to
735:
Ah I see, thanks. The reason I mentioned the notability was just because my prior research by talking to other contributors had suggested that the most important factor was the notability and that this factor overrode all others. I am going to read more about the rules, make some changes and have a
1334:
Thanks for explaining about the numeric signature attached to my last post. I saw it myself and tried going back into edit to work out why. I think that I must have logged into the wrong account. The problem I have with the references is not just that they are confusing but that in certain cases I
1042:
Firstly, W Nowicki, thank you for your kind help. Sorry to take a while to respond. JamesBWatson, thank you for unblocking me. As advised, from now on I will refrain from providing edits to the NBFA page, hopefully other
Knowledge users will make any changes that need to be made. I appreciate your
1079:
W Nowicki, thanks again for your kindness. I appreciate that there is a point to rules on
Knowledge and it must take a lot of effort to enforce them. Both before posting and in response to comments I have tried to understand the rules and will continue to learn. If I post anything I will be very
997:
Hi, sorry I am quite confused. I was told I needed to change my username, which I was more than happy to do. I submitted a username request and didn't log in for several days as advised. Now I have found that my account has been blocked. So for example I don't know how I can respond regarding my
1252:
I have now linked a few of the
Trustees and other officials. I was unsure whether references were needed in each case on the edited page itself or whether the link and the reference on the National Benevolent Fund for the Aged page was enough. I tried to provide references where I could anyway.
1351:
Not sure what you are asking. Citations go after the sentence (or paragraph) with the infomation in it that comes from that source. Also after any puctuation (the "full stop"). This is normal for academic writing; I did a Ph.D. dissertation so got used to it long ago. Here is the sentence in
1307:
Oh yes the various conventions for references are confusing. But at least my thinking is that adding a source in a slightly different format is better than not adding it, since it can always be reformatted later. I only started Knowledge editing two years ago, and it looked to me like the
637:
When writing the article, I was conscious of the fact that I was connected so I tried to present a neutral view. For example, I didn't make any claims about the impact that the work of the charity has, and stuck to facts such as when the charity was founded, what services it offers etc.
683:
Dear Alexf, thanks for your quick response and thanks for the clarification, that's really good to hear. The reason I thought that your message was refering to more than the username was because of the bit which reads 'Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account,
724:
as the rules require but it is hard to be neutral when writing about your organization. That's why I don't write about my employer (yes they have an article). Be careful. Correcting obvious mistakes, grammar, and falsehoods is OK. Extending the article may not be in your case. --
1274:
with dated words like "currently". Just say what the source says, e.g. in 2011 she was... or "since 1974" or whatever. It might be "current" now, but ten years from now it might not be. Legally we need to be even more careful about living people since there are liability issues.
629:
Dear Alexf, Thanks very much for your comments. I am new to this and was originally going to post on your talk page until I read on there you would prefer people continue the conversation on their own pages. I hope I am posting this in the right place.
497:
Thanks for the kind welcome Doug. I have been told that I need to format the reference and links properly on the page but despite reading through the guidance I don't really understand how to do it. I would appreciate any advice that you could give me.
1237:
of issues already discussed, and also because I am new on here (and not that technically gifted!). I will try out your tips when I have time and try to do a bit of work on it. Thanks for taking the trouble, again, to explain things to me. (
1390:
Thanks- it wasn't the code in the body that I was confused about but the way it was set up below. However I now think I see what you mean. Will have another look at it when I have time. Thanks for using an example to show me- that helps.
641:
Before writing this article I took guidance from a number of people who have created Knowledge articles for their charities. The advice everyone gave that what matters was notability and neutrality, both of which I tried to achieve.
1362:{{cite web |title= Winston Churchill |work= Newsletter |date= Summer 2010 |publisher= National Benevolent Fund for the Aged |url= http://www.nbfa.org.uk/newsletter/nbfa-news-summer-10.pdf |accessdate= 5 August 2011 }}</ref: -->
1080:
careful. I very much hope that other Knowledge users will be able to add approvements and amendments to the page. Now that it has been approved I will of course just use my new username from now on. I appreciate your help. (
1209:
from time to time people will add one of those obnoxious complaint tags noting this instead of doing the work to link them in. Here is a good process: hit the "search" button without typing any text, which gets you to the
875:
1221:. The other point I would add is that if you have a cited source that links two subjects, after adding it to one you can often add the same source to the other and link back the other direction, if it does not already.
1269:
It is best to add the citation after any information that can be verified by it, so yes, should be all places it is used. You can use a named ref to reduce duplication within the same article. Also avoid saying, as in
1063:
remove anything critical of the organization that has been properly sourced. Adding new information with verifiable sources that is not promotion can be fine. You can always as for feedback on the talk pages too.
1143:
781:
634:'notability' and secondly being able to back up claims. I worked hard on both counts. Many people connected to the organisation also have Knowledge pages, as do other organisations in our field.
665:
This notice was not about the article or its notability but the username which is in violation of the rules. As stated in #2 above, if you want to keep the edit history, you can visit
615:
from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
1376:
already at the end puts the source details there. I just did a cut-n-paste of the citation from the other article. You can always hit "show preview" to see what it looks like.
40:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
690:
from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest' . I will change the username and make the reference changes which have already been suggested. (
62:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Knowledge, you might want to consider being "
518:, but I happened to see your help request. I've changed the formatting of the first reference and the first external link so that you can see how it can be done.
163:
774:
1059:
To clarify, you can still edit the NBFA page, although best would be under your new user name, and being extra careful to use neutral language. Especially
952:
712:. I said the issue here was not questioning the notability of the article's subject. That's a separate issue. The username problem also carries a
207:
71:
777:
even changed its title to match our conventions. I added a photo of a notable person who I think was involved. Hope did not do too much damage.
148:
185:
1392:
1292:
1132:
1123:
767:
59:
1218:
947:
812:
808:
442:
484:
58:
394:
203:
181:
1182:
1162:
if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
825:
523:
258:
198:
358:
308:
1353:
1271:
1137:
371:
326:
312:
115:
891:
666:
616:
434:
295:
1163:
1149:
1111:
966:
390:
286:
236:
232:
125:
37:
860:
531:
254:
215:
859:
against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have
1396:
1296:
924:
866:
594:
416:
412:
241:
194:
334:
223:
190:
882:
for their own Knowledge article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an
1104:
1030:
753:
321:
290:
219:
107:
63:
31:
1406:
Apologies, I don't know what happened there, I believed I was logged in. The previous post was from me (
1116:
429:
380:
376:
367:
363:
67:
49:
1407:
1336:
1254:
1238:
1193:
1153:
1081:
930:
646:
example? By looking at other articles, I think that the organisation is notable enough for an entry.
527:
425:
262:
228:
53:
1381:
1324:
1280:
1226:
1069:
790:
317:
303:
249:
154:
1176:
1159:
831:
488:
299:
158:
111:
1361:
He was also involved with the ], as trustee from 1974 and chair from 1995 to 2010.<ref: -->
1044:
999:
737:
691:
650:
499:
1312:
1026:
856:
775:
Knowledge:Requests for feedback/2011 August 1#The National Benevolent Fund for the Aged (NBFA)
670:
588:
555:
386:
353:
75:
1370:
897:
583:
policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
471:
74:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
438:
1377:
1320:
1276:
1222:
1065:
1048:
1003:
801:
786:
741:
721:
717:
695:
654:
602:
580:
503:
420:
245:
70:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
1172:
1022:
887:
883:
818:
713:
598:
574:
330:
143:
878:
that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently
835:
554:
Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the
121:
464:
1146:.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page
879:
874:
Additionally, it appears your account is intended to be used for the purpose of
890:. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may
907:
757:
726:
674:
620:
562:
seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.
601:
to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for
515:
79:
1415:
1400:
1385:
1344:
1328:
1300:
1284:
1262:
1246:
1230:
1201:
1186:
1089:
1073:
1052:
1034:
1007:
910:
843:
794:
760:
745:
729:
699:
677:
658:
623:
535:
507:
82:
597:
with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider
780:
I took the liberty of nominating it for the Did You Know section. See
811:, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up
522:
will show you the changes I made. You can find an example of this at
609:
Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account,
1319:
numeric signature above indicates a login that expired probably.
1214:
1144:
Template talk:Did you know/National Benevolent Fund for the Aged
782:
Template talk:Did you know/National Benevolent Fund for the Aged
1099:
459:
273:
94:
24:
1128:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was
915:
848:
1210:
980:
976:
970:
961:
957:
943:
939:
935:
519:
476:
1142:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
923:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
720:to understand. I appreciate your willingness to be
483:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
1025:, and exercise considerable caution if you do so.
474:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
78:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
876:telling the world about an organization or cause
752:Not so. many factors are equally important. See
617:our frequently asked questions for organizations
52:and ask your question there. Please remember to
886:, though you may wish to consider one of these
1291:differently that it isn't always clear to me.(
807:Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to
1096:DYK for National Benevolent Fund for the Aged
8:
66:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
475:
1120:was updated with a fact from the article
998:username request. How should I proceed?
869:with a username that represents only you
855:Welcome to Knowledge. Because we have a
1133:National Benevolent Fund for the Aged
1124:National Benevolent Fund for the Aged
813:at your username change request entry
768:National Benevolent Fund for the Aged
7:
1219:Knowledge:Manual of Style (linking)
589:cannot represent a group of people
14:
1253:Thanks again for your guidance. (
815:as soon as possible. Thank you.
1103:
546:
463:
57:
20:
573:It is possible that you have a
164:Request administrator attention
1021:on topics in which you have a
906:below this notice. Thank you.
773:I did some work on it, as per
566:There are two issues with this
524:Help:Citations quick reference
1:
884:inherent conflict of interest
208:Biographies of living persons
108:The five pillars of Knowledge
90:
1354:Winston Churchill (grandson)
1272:Mary Soames, Baroness Soames
809:your username change request
579:In keeping with Knowledge's
1416:09:07, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
1401:09:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
1386:19:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
1345:08:11, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
1329:17:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
1301:10:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
1285:18:56, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
1263:10:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
1247:08:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
1231:17:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
1202:09:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
1187:00:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
927:, who accepted the request.
667:Knowledge:Changing username
487:, or consider visiting the
233:Policy for non-free content
149:New contributors' help page
1432:
1090:08:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
1074:18:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
1053:13:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
1035:12:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
1008:11:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
911:20:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
892:appeal this username block
844:05:58, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
795:22:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
761:13:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
746:13:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
730:11:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
700:10:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
678:10:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
659:09:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
624:16:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
536:16:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
508:12:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
144:Frequently Asked Questions
83:10:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
56:on talk pages by clicking
1217:. The guideline would be
800:Your attention needed at
526:. See how you get on! --
1411:
1340:
1258:
1242:
1197:
1085:
1164:Did you know? talk page
649:Thanks for your help, (
359:Help develop an article
173:Policies and Guidelines
920:
853:
837:Join WikiProject Japan
785:be cited or corrected.
754:Knowledge:Five pillars
599:changing your username
967:change block settings
919:
902:Your reason here ~~~~
852:
709:you are not exempted!
581:neutral point of view
552:Welcome to Knowledge.
204:What Knowledge is not
182:Neutral point of view
1023:conflict of interest
867:create a new account
714:conflict of interest
687:you are not exempted
671:create a new account
612:you are not exempted
603:promotional purposes
595:create a new account
575:conflict of interest
478:ask another question
381:Translating articles
291:Adopt-a-user program
259:Conflict of interest
199:No original research
894:by adding the text
888:alternative outlets
865:you are welcome to
309:No personal attacks
921:
854:
716:. Please read the
377:Join a WikiProject
372:Requested articles
354:Be bold in editing
313:Resolving disputes
116:Your first article
38:your contributions
1170:
1169:
1157:
841:
495:
494:
480:on your talk page
458:
457:
454:
453:
450:
449:
296:Assume good faith
270:
269:
220:Three-revert rule
89:
88:
1423:
1375:
1369:
1317:
1311:
1147:
1107:
1100:
986:
984:
973:
955:
953:deleted contribs
918:
905:
851:
842:
838:
832:Talk to Nihonjoe
828:
824:
821:
593:You may wish to
558:you have chosen
550:
549:
482:
467:
460:
435:Useful templates
287:Community Portal
274:
237:Image use policy
186:Reliable sources
95:
91:
61:
46:
45:
25:
21:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1393:195.206.164.157
1373:
1367:
1315:
1309:
1293:195.206.164.157
1098:
1039:
1038:
1011:
974:
964:
950:
933:
916:
913:
895:
849:
836:
826:
819:
816:
805:
771:
547:
544:
528:John of Reading
405:
345:
318:Build consensus
279:
255:Deletion policy
216:Manual of Style
174:
136:
126:upload an image
100:
99:Getting Started
85:
43:
42:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1429:
1427:
1364:
1363:
1358:
1357:
1332:
1331:
1288:
1287:
1234:
1233:
1168:
1167:
1158:and add it to
1112:10 August 2011
1108:
1097:
1094:
1077:
1076:
1041:
1018:
995:
991:Request reason
988:
914:
873:
872:
863:this account;
847:
804:
798:
770:
765:
764:
763:
733:
732:
681:
680:
628:
619:. Thank you.
607:
606:
584:
543:
540:
539:
538:
493:
492:
485:user talk page
468:
456:
455:
452:
451:
448:
447:
446:
445:
432:
423:
407:
406:
403:
400:
399:
398:
397:
383:
374:
361:
347:
346:
343:
340:
339:
338:
337:
324:
315:
306:
293:
281:
280:
277:
271:
268:
267:
266:
265:
252:
242:External links
239:
226:
212:
211:
210:
201:
195:Citing sources
188:
176:
175:
172:
169:
168:
167:
166:
161:
151:
146:
138:
137:
134:
131:
130:
129:
128:
118:
102:
101:
98:
87:
86:
54:sign your name
36:Thank you for
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1428:
1419:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1404:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1372:
1366:And then the
1360:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1314:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1250:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1165:
1161:
1155:
1151:
1145:
1141:
1140:fund-raisers?
1139:
1135:
1134:
1130:... that the
1127:
1126:
1125:
1119:
1118:
1117:Did you know?
1113:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1095:
1093:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1017:
1015:
1014:Accept reason
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
994:
992:
987:
982:
978:
972:
968:
963:
959:
954:
949:
945:
944:global blocks
941:
940:active blocks
937:
932:
928:
926:
925:administrator
912:
909:
903:
899:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
870:
868:
862:
858:
846:
845:
839:
833:
829:
822:
814:
810:
803:
799:
797:
796:
792:
788:
783:
778:
776:
769:
766:
762:
759:
755:
751:
750:
749:
747:
743:
739:
736:good think. (
731:
728:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
705:
704:
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
688:
679:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
660:
656:
652:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
626:
625:
622:
618:
614:
613:
604:
600:
596:
592:
590:
587:Your account
585:
582:
578:
576:
571:
570:
569:
567:
563:
561:
557:
553:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
511:
509:
505:
501:
490:
486:
481:
479:
473:
469:
466:
462:
461:
444:
440:
436:
433:
431:
427:
424:
422:
418:
414:
411:
410:
409:
408:
404:Miscellaneous
402:
401:
396:
392:
388:
385:Cleaning up:
384:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
362:
360:
356:
355:
351:
350:
349:
348:
342:
341:
336:
335:Mailing lists
332:
328:
325:
323:
319:
316:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
294:
292:
288:
285:
284:
283:
282:
278:The Community
276:
275:
272:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
227:
225:
224:Sock puppetry
221:
217:
214:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
192:
191:Verifiability
189:
187:
183:
180:
179:
178:
177:
171:
170:
165:
162:
160:
159:make requests
156:
155:ask questions
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
133:
132:
127:
123:
119:
117:
113:
109:
106:
105:
104:
103:
97:
96:
93:
92:
84:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
39:
35:
34:to Knowledge!
33:
29:Hello, Nbfa!
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
1408:Galatidanube
1405:
1389:
1365:
1337:Galatidanube
1333:
1289:
1255:Galatidanube
1251:
1239:Galatidanube
1235:
1194:Galatidanube
1190:
1179:
1171:
1131:
1129:
1122:
1121:
1115:
1082:Galatidanube
1078:
1060:
1040:
1027:JamesBWatson
1019:
1013:
1012:
996:
990:
989:
962:creation log
931:Galatidanube
929:
922:
901:
864:
806:
779:
772:
734:
718:Business FAQ
708:
707:
686:
685:
682:
669:, else just
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
627:
611:
610:
608:
586:
572:
565:
564:
559:
551:
545:
496:
477:
472:help request
443:User scripts
417:Disambiguity
352:
344:Things to do
331:IRC channels
322:Village pump
135:Getting Help
76:edit summary
41:
30:
1211:search page
1154:quick check
542:August 2011
368:Peer review
364:Maintenance
122:edit a page
68:WikiProject
1150:here's how
958:filter log
430:Talk pages
426:User pages
413:Categories
263:Notability
229:Copyrights
153:Where to:
44:{{helpme}}
1378:W Nowicki
1321:W Nowicki
1277:W Nowicki
1223:W Nowicki
1138:tea party
1066:W Nowicki
977:checkuser
936:block log
787:W Nowicki
520:This link
516:User:Doug
395:Vandalism
304:Etiquette
250:Vandalism
50:talk page
1313:cite web
1183:contribs
1173:Casliber
1160:DYKSTATS
948:contribs
900:|reason=
556:username
514:I'm not
489:Teahouse
327:Signpost
300:Civility
120:How to:
112:Tutorial
48:on your
1371:reflist
1043:help. (
971:unblock
898:unblock
880:notable
861:blocked
802:WP:CHUS
722:neutral
706:Ah but
387:General
64:adopted
32:Welcome
17:Welcome
857:policy
560:(Nbfa)
1136:held
1061:never
908:Panyd
758:Alexf
756:. --
727:Alexf
675:Alexf
673:. --
621:Alexf
470:This
439:Tools
421:Stubs
80:Doug.
1412:talk
1397:talk
1382:talk
1341:talk
1325:talk
1297:talk
1281:talk
1259:talk
1243:talk
1227:talk
1215:NBFA
1198:talk
1177:talk
1086:talk
1070:talk
1049:talk
1045:Nbfa
1031:talk
1004:talk
1000:Nbfa
791:talk
742:talk
738:Nbfa
696:talk
692:Nbfa
655:talk
651:Nbfa
532:talk
504:talk
500:Nbfa
391:Spam
246:Spam
72:here
1110:On
981:log
820:日本穣
817:···
1418:)
1414:)
1403:)
1399:)
1384:)
1374:}}
1368:{{
1347:)
1343:)
1327:)
1316:}}
1310:{{
1303:)
1299:)
1283:)
1265:)
1261:)
1249:)
1245:)
1229:)
1204:)
1200:)
1185:)
1152:,
1114:,
1092:)
1088:)
1072:)
1055:)
1051:)
1033:)
1016::
1006:)
993::
975:•
969:•
965:•
960:•
956:•
951:•
946:•
942:•
938:•
904:}}
896:{{
834:·
830:·
827:投稿
823:·
793:)
748:)
744:)
702:)
698:)
661:)
657:)
568::
534:)
510:)
506:)
441:•
437:•
428:•
419:•
415:•
393:•
389:•
379:•
370:•
366:•
357:•
333:•
329:•
320:•
311:•
302:•
298:•
289:•
261:•
257:•
248:•
244:•
235:•
231:•
222:•
218:•
206:•
197:•
193:•
184:•
157:•
124:•
114:•
110:•
1410:(
1395:(
1391:(
1380:(
1356::
1339:(
1323:(
1295:(
1279:(
1257:(
1241:(
1225:(
1196:(
1180:·
1175:(
1166:.
1156:)
1148:(
1084:(
1068:(
1047:(
1029:(
1002:(
985:)
983:)
979:(
934:(
871:.
840:!
789:(
740:(
694:(
653:(
605:.
591:.
577:.
530:(
502:(
498:(
491:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
