306:, and neglecting the oddity that a one line quote appears across seven pages as cited, Lua Getsinger is not considered an authority on Bahá'à doctrine by anybody. She was a believer for less than two years when she met 'Abdul-Bahá, so her reaction probably amounts to not much more than the hyperbolic reaction of a new convert meeting the head of her faith for the first time. Her emotional intensity deserves respect, but that hardly makes it authoritative doctrine. Anyone with passing familiarity with
425:
78:
41:
266:
One does not simply remove material, that meets wikipedia guidelines on content and sourcing, from an article without discussion on the talk page at the very least. Removing the material, while suggesting that it be moved, but not moving it yourself is not showing good faith indeed. You might take
124:
Hi Jeff, I didn't mean any offense with the above comments, and I certainly didn't mean to accuse you of being the vandal. I apologise for refering to
Remeyite - I didn't realise you would consider it offensive. I only used the term because it was clear the vandal was a follower of Mason Remey but
113:
I don't suppose you've noiced the vandalism that was suffered on the Bf pages today? It seems from the earlier posts to have been done by a follower of Mason Remey. I realised that you are a follower too, and wondered if you could say something as I'm sure this kind of thing damages both wikipedia
67:
It might also help if you provide references to the facts you're adding, like the BUPC website. I'm not continuously reverting your edits out of spite or censorship or something like that, but if your edits continue to look like propaganda for the BUPC I will continue to revert them.
60:
Please try to keep your edits factual. Regardless of whether or not you like it, the fact is that Jensen and his followers are considered as covenant breakers by the majority of Baha'is. You might feel better by mentioning that Jensen considers all the others as covenant breakers.
95:
Re your comments on Cunado's home page, there is a caveat at the top of the page that explains the website deals with the mainstream Baha'i Faith - what you would call the Haifa Baha'is. As they consider
Lelland a CB surely that is enough to leave as is.
244:
I don't have a problem with properly documented, NPOV, articles on the BUPC. Knowledge isn't a soapbox or propoganda rag for any of us, so that's why I have stood, and will continue to stand, on proper sourcing and NPOV on
140:
Do not remove a {{nosource}} tag from an image unless you have provided a source. Even if you think an image is out of copyright, we still need to know the source so that we can judge whether it is out of copyright. --
319:
did you show that the geneology was published or authentic? It was pretty easy to declare the discussion closed since you hadn't demonstrated the document's authenticity — which is the foundation of the
415:
You're not supposed to delete your own talk page. I got in trouble for that once. You can archive it if you don't want to see it or if it's bothering you. If you don't know how I'll do it for you.
342:
The document cited, if granted as genuine and as accurate as possible, lacks any documentation that the lines from
Riunian to Bostanai and from Bostanai to Aqa Fakr – both of which skip
371:
reference to the "Throne of David" occurs in a passage that begins "At one time We address the people of the Torah" so he, himself, is refering to Christ's fulfilment of this prophecy
329:
Here are the arguments, again, that this thesis is false. As you did ask to be addressed point-by-point, would you please return the courtesy and answer point-by-point.
252:
Actually, the more objective information on the BUPC, the better. It'll shine a bright light and throw into high relief the differences between them and the Bahá'Ăs.
162:
Nice to see you adding some sources to your edits. Their absence, and over-reliance on online sources, has compromised your contributions to-date.
114:
and
Remeyites themselves. I appreciate Haifan Baha'is can be difficult at times but I'm sure there are better ways of dealing with them than this.
31:
Making a lot of accounts does not fool anyone. If you don't have at least 100 edits then you're not considered a legitimate account.
206:
339:
The document cited is by an unknown author, of unknown training, using unverifiable data — so its authenticy can not be determined.
223:
218:
271:
183:
315:
You asked for a point—by—point answer and you recieved one. You didn't seem obliged to return the consideration. Where
310:
would surmise that he'd have been embarrased, to say the least, to be referred to as "the King of the whole world".
64:
Try to state what his beliefs are, and not state his beliefs as facts. There's a subtle but important difference.
17:
238:
193:
297:
than I do. I usually think of sound logic based on examining as much data as possible from verifiable sources.
228:
213:
233:
178:
350:
male — so it can't be asserted as established fact that the line from David to Bahá'u'lláh is either.
198:
429:
401:
307:
268:
253:
142:
82:
45:
434:
404:
256:
152:
129:
118:
105:
87:
50:
169:
yet, so let me post for you several of the wikipedia links that may be helpful to you.
416:
188:
126:
115:
102:
69:
32:
267:
an hour and read the Five
Pillars — One, Two and Four seem particularly appropriate.
336:
The document cited is not published — so its authenticity has not been vouched for.
147:
99:
Alternatively do you think that the BF page should reflect non-Haifa Baha'is too?
390:
sense — so your dismissal of these is erroneous as they specifically address the
424:
77:
40:
289:? I thought that was just a tag-line. And exactly which argument have you "
302:
Addressing the
Getsinger quote as you assert that that's some kind of
386:
in the context of Christ's fulfilment of these prophesies in
125:
not clear he was BUPC - he could have been
Orthodox Baha'i.
165:
You don't seem to have had the "Welcome to
Knowledge"
285:You're using this passage citing Lua Getsinger as
360:The subject's eldest son, 'Abdul-Bahá, likewise
8:
293:"? Sorry. You must have a different idea of
261:
382:refers to the "Throne of David" as purely
353:The subject of this debate, Bahá'u'lláh,
378:'Abdul-Bahá, likewise Shoghi Effendi,
7:
262:Baha'i divisions: Role of the Hands
24:
423:
364:made any claim of this ancestry.
357:made any claim of this ancestry.
76:
39:
1:
435:19:31, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
405:05:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
394:point of view on the subject.
272:03:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
179:The Five Pillars of Knowledge
153:09:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
130:13:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
119:18:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
106:13:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
88:08:30, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
257:22:14, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
51:16:50, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
450:
18:User talk:General Disarray
158:Nice to see some sources
207:policies and guidelines
224:Neutral point of view
219:No original research
411:deleting talk page
214:Verifiable sources
184:How to edit a page
234:Cite your sources
151:
441:
432:
427:
421:
239:Reliable sources
145:
85:
80:
74:
48:
43:
37:
449:
448:
444:
443:
442:
440:
439:
438:
430:
417:
413:
279:
264:
229:Dubious sources
210:
194:Manual of Style
175:
160:
138:
83:
70:
58:
46:
33:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
447:
445:
412:
409:
408:
407:
398:
397:
396:
395:
376:
373:metaphorically
367:Bahá'u'lláh's
365:
358:
351:
340:
337:
331:
330:
326:
325:
312:
311:
299:
298:
278:
275:
263:
260:
242:
241:
236:
231:
226:
221:
216:
209:
203:
202:
201:
196:
191:
186:
181:
174:
171:
159:
156:
137:
134:
133:
132:
57:
54:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
446:
437:
436:
433:
426:
422:
420:
410:
406:
403:
402:MARussellPESE
400:
399:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
370:
366:
363:
359:
356:
352:
349:
345:
341:
338:
335:
334:
333:
332:
328:
327:
323:
318:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
280:
276:
274:
273:
270:
269:MARussellPESE
259:
258:
255:
254:MARussellPESE
250:
248:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
211:
208:
204:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
176:
172:
170:
168:
163:
157:
155:
154:
149:
144:
135:
131:
128:
123:
122:
121:
120:
117:
111:
108:
107:
104:
100:
97:
93:
90:
89:
86:
79:
75:
73:
65:
62:
55:
53:
52:
49:
42:
38:
36:
26:
19:
418:
414:
391:
387:
384:metaphorical
383:
379:
372:
368:
361:
354:
347:
343:
321:
316:
303:
294:
290:
286:
282:
277:Davidic Line
265:
251:
246:
243:
166:
164:
161:
139:
112:
109:
101:
98:
94:
91:
71:
66:
63:
59:
34:
30:
380:exclusively
348:exclusively
344:generations
308:'Abdul-Bahá
27:new account
205:Wikepedia
189:Help pages
136:image tags
291:subverted
249:article.
199:Help desk
148:fav state
110:HI Jeff,
92:Hi Jeff,
143:RHaworth
127:AndrewRT
116:AndrewRT
103:AndrewRT
324:thesis.
317:exactly
173:Editing
419:Cuñado
392:Bahá'Ă
346:– are
322:entire
72:Cuñado
35:Cuñado
362:never
355:never
304:proof
295:proof
287:proof
167:spiel
16:<
431:Talk
388:that
369:sole
84:Talk
56:BUPC
47:Talk
283:Oh.
247:any
428:-
81:-
44:-
375:.
150:)
146:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
