User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 14

698:] (which has links showing the decline of editor participation after a couple of years and the need to encourage editors to stay on). Then the fact that I had reached my personal goals of 6,000 edits, 175 created pages, contributed satisfactorily (IMHO) to the four projects of which I am a member, corrected a lot of translated material, involvement with the German-language Knowledge (XXG) of which I am a Sichter (a kind of reviewer) and providing and checking references, because I can make use of the national archives and library which are close to where I live. So I hope you'll understand that some things had to be placed on the back-burner, and it hasn't been possible to keep up with every recommendation coming from various parts of Knowledge (XXG). Now I'd like to get involved in new areas, and this is one that I am interested in and that I think I can handle (maybe the fact that I have a post-grad in Computer Science and worked for a long time in development of image-handling SW for IBM might help?). Regards, 1258:" That is not a genuine reason for a move; it is an attempt to make a partisan point. If you do not now see that, and make honourable amends by reversing your action, you are implicated. You are then responsible for diverting the efforts of editors to repair things by more complex means, since the damage is set to spread well beyond the first article to many, many articles and categories under Category:Mexican–American War and beyond. I urge you, once again, to respond to our reasoned and cogently argued proposal: undo the damage. With my best wishes.– 504:

feel needs rewording? I know the article has been tagged for advertising, and at first galnce I can understand the point; however, when the reader analyses the language, I don't feel it is any more implicitly promotional than most business articles on wikipedia. If you could keep me posted I would really appreciate it. Thank you for not speedily deleting the article becuase, as I'm sure you realise, it has taken a lot of time and effort and I am keen to get it to wikipedia standards rather than just giving up and letting it be deleted. Thanks again,

235:

better!). The problem with having typos redirected for topics like scientific names is that they then propagate around the replicates of Knowledge (XXG) and become established when they would not otherwise exist. Anyone who understands Latin nomenclature for plant families well enough to use this term knows that such names always end in "-aceae" and will quickly correct their error when searching doesn't find what they want. I'm very uneasy about the effects of so many redirects of typos in Knowledge (XXG).

31: 1769:

not exactly a title which a town should be proud of, or really a piece of information that is appropriate on Knowledge (XXG), as it most likely could have led to more vandalism on the page, it was also added by a user who first ever edit was that comment, further highlighting the fact it was added as intentional vandalism, hence why I'm slightly bewildered to why you threatened me with a ban. If anything, i'd be putting a warning onto User:27.32.101.44.

2007: 1478: 652: 625: 356:. While I don't speak more than a smidgeon of Tagalog, I think it is enough to determine that the google translate of the article is close to reasonable (tweek a word or two). It is definitely a stub (the tl article is as well), but I think it is a reasonable start and doesn't appear to be a copyvio. Could you please do a quick check and either comment here or on the talk page for the article. Thank you. 1533: 1768:

I apologize if i somehow have offended you with removing that comment. I removed it simply because it appeared to be a blatant piece of vandalism, something one comes across every now and then. Secondly it had no source to suggest that it was the "number one bogan capital of Australia". Thirdly, it's

1417:

I am aware of the guidelines, sorry if I came out rough. I'll remove the wikibreak templates, sorry about my laggy userpage, I've been meaning to fix that for some time. I'm very familiar with image use policy and copyright. I'll take on board your suggestion and come back when I'm ready. Thanks very

1143:

The way punctuation with dashes and hyphens fits with spelling and with other parameters of style is complex and technical. The most relevant policy page does not address this matter. I am disappointed that you ignore the points I make about this. Have you surveyed the issues in depth, as I and other

994:

The consensus was pretty clear to move the article, no one provided any evidence that dash was used in reliable sources. The MOS is primarily for content of articles and is a guide, whereas WP:article names is a policy. Policies take precedence, so arguments using policy are more heavily weighted.

712:

About file mover permission, I have demonstrated to you that I know the procedures on how to move files accordingly to Commons file renaming policy, and to an extent, wikipedia's file renaming policy, since both are virtually the same. Had you've been following my contribs, you would've seen them, I

411:

Thanks for your speedy correction to the page 3 (number). You see, I did this as a test for my 2 sons (ages 10 and 12) who both expressed a distrust of Knowledge (XXG) because "anyone can put anything out there". I encouraged them to test their ideas, so together we added a small Monty Python joke

1249:

Graeme, with respect: I for one have been talking about your closing of the discussion. So has Tony. We are still waiting for your answers on that focused matter. At the head of your talkpage you say you might look at reversing deletions you have made. Why is the same openness to review not applied

962:, just well-followed guidelines). It would not be approved of by the community if their attention were drawn to it and its insidious consequences. You will understand, therefore, that I reserve the option of raising the matter for wider scrutiny. Meanwhile, it is reasonable that I provide a link at 816:

There is no true consensus for the change you have made. At best, there is a merely local consensus, among editors whose focus is on the war in question. If the matter were addressed in a larger forum, the story would be quite different. Are we to think that there is project-wide consensus to allow

522:

Thank you Graeme, I am not able to work on gathering sources again until Friday. However, on Friday I will be dedicating time to researching additional reliable sources from magazines, books and newspapers, though the chances of finding sources from over 5 year ago are not great. Also, while I will

152:

Thank you so much for adding the artist's portrait and yes "the future of reproduction" painting on flickr was intended to be added per your license recommendation. Unfortunately the admin DragonFlySixtyseven has deleted the article. I hope to recreate the article with expansions to show why he is

1784:

Not wanting to get into a massive argument, making mountains over molehills etc, however I still maintain that I was attempting to do the correct thing by labeling the edit as vandalism. The comment offers nothing at all constructive towards the page, and i maintain, It was the user's first actual

1164:

guidelines. Once more, I am disappointed that you ignore that. Not only is your doing so a threat to established consistency in Knowledge (XXG), it discounts what a cohort of editors have done at the Manual of Style to enable that consistency. Yes: some people disagree with the details laid out at

1093:

Grahame Bartlet, you have damaged WP; you need to move the article back again and avoid making precipitous actions such as this in the future. You say " The MOS is primarily for content of articles and is a guide, whereas WP:article names is a policy."; could you explain where, exactly, the naming

1048:

1028:

As I suggest, consensus was not established widely enough. Whether any "custodians" of the article like it or not, Knowledge (XXG) does have a way of managing titles of articles: partly given in policy, but amplified in guidelines where policy is silent. The way punctuation with dashes and hyphens

1172:

Your action has introduced a specific and striking failure of uniformity in articles covered by Category:Mexican–American War. Plainly this is undesirable. Categories (like the MOS pages) exist to support consistency, and haphazard naming works directly against them. What is your plan, or what is

1056:

503:

Thanks for the message. while I have provided a lot of relevant sources, many pieces of past evidence have been short-sightedly thrown away. Also, a different administrator told me that I couldnt cite book references or magazines as he/she was unable to verify them. Is there any language that you

234:

I take your point about "Zosterophyllacea" being a plausible typo for "Zosterophyllaceae", but here's the counter-argument. If you search for "Zosterophyllacea" in Google, all but one of 16 responses are actually sourced from Knowledge (XXG) (the odd one is the Paleos.com page; they should know

1024:

they cite guidance that is external to the domain of the article but conflicting with established practice at Knowledge (XXG). The MOS line on en dashes and hyphens is well considered (as are some possible alternative lines), and widely implemented as I clearly show above. But it is surely not

812:

As I have pointed out at the talkpage for the article you moved, this is a matter of central style for the look-and-feel of titles throughout the project. It is not at all clear that we must "follow the sources" in every particular of punctuation and related styling. Every serious, substantial

766:

Could you provide evidence support your assertion that "published sources exclusively use hyphen not dash". Please explain whether you read the discussion at the talk page, whether some argument was successfully put that that particular article should be made inconsistent with the style guide,

725:

the relevant policies." IMO, you seem to be balking at granting me this user right, for reasons I'm not sure of. Can we wrap this up now? It's not a RFA or RFB; for a file mover request more than 10 people before me got their permissions before I requested it. And almost no one got questioned.

412:

to the 3 page and made friendly bets on how long it would stay there. They were thinking it would take months and here you cleaned it up in under 2 hours. Well, sorry for putting you through this, but I thought it would be worth it in the grand scheme of things. I hope you feel the same.

1366:

The two of them are harmful to Knowledge (XXG), not least in wasting your time and mine in their ceaseless effort to enforce a rule they've made up, which is not supported by English usage, not supported by the text of MOS, and which makes Knowledge (XXG) look like it was written by the

1169:, in the present case. But once more, it is patently obvious that the community defers to MOS for the larger good, in naming articles. The community demands the kind of consistency we find in any serious encyclopedia, or any publication that claims the respect of readers. 1053:, in the present case. But once more, it is patently obvious that the community defers to MOS for the larger good, in naming articles. The community demands the kind of consistency we find in any serious encyclopedia, or any publication that claims the respect of readers. 1182:

None of this is settled in the discussion at the talkpage for the moved article; and you did not join that discussion anyway, or signal your intention to act there – ignoring my argument that it was the wrong forum for the matter to be settled. Please explain

957:

I urge you in the strongest terms to reconsider and revoke your move. It is against the best interests of the project as a whole, and it is (with respect) made on the shakiest theoretical and policy foundations (there is no policy concerning the style of such

1888: 215:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - 813:

publication has its own style for hyphens, dashes, italics, and so on: and every one of them will adapt some of these features according to its own need for visible consistency. Doing otherwise, they would do a disservice to their readers.

330:

Because I want to see what it would be like to go one week without Knowledge (XXG). I edit Knowledge (XXG) EVERY DAY, and I feel like it's unhealthy to go on Knowledge (XXG) this often. I wonder what I would do for fun while I'm blocked.

713:

provided a link to you. One thing I still do not understand is why you pull me over and question me about how to do file renaming. As my reasons for requesting file mover said, "I am an active user on both Commons and WIkipedia, am

375:

Since my article on Soma Snakeoil was deleted could I get some guidance or assistance to avoid this snafu in the future and since you all do edit down the redundant links (very helpful by the way) so this doesn't happen again.

211: 767:

whether you intend to change the en dash used in all of the other articles in the war category to hyphens, and whether you posted a message at the talk page warning of your intended action in moving the article name.

1112:

Tony, all the arguments are on the talk page, you can read them there, What I have done is close the debate and move the article. I am not adding to the debate, but explaining the reason for the close decision.

1812:, is up and nobody tags it for deletion but it's got NO NOTABLILITY, NOTHING. I made Richard's wiki notable. Can you please assist me in telling me how it does not meet the requirements, but Steve Edge does? -- 1507:

Please see my latest post at the talk page where you damaged the article, the reputation of admins, and your own standing, on why your flagrant abuse of the role makes your continued role untenable at WP.

1176:

Please note the evident disparity between the depth and detail with which you and I have considered each other's points – along with the wider effects on the Project. Again I request that you reconsider.

1060:

1672:

Hey there.Thank you for replying me back for request of file mover.It took about one day to process and about an hour,you rejected it.What do you mean I didn't use the file mover?Can you tell me?--

1458:

option on the file pages. It will be very helpful, if you'll explain me the procedure, so that i'd able to do this my new job, i asked same from another administrator but he didn't reply at all.

1250:

for this ill-considered move of a page? It is hard to escape the conclusion that you have been manipulated by PMAnderson's ploy aimed at pointed disruption. He now has the temerity to admit it: "

817:

editors at each article to decide such things? If so, should we be happy that the following should all drift their own way? Just a few of the many Mexico articles and categories, for a start:

1831:

Since my last software update the filter on my laptop (and similar laptops from the program) has been blocking harmless programs, firefox, usb modem software etc. so I'll have to refer to

1140:

Are we to think that there is project-wide consensus to allow editors at each article to decide such things ? If so, should we be happy that the following should all drift their own way?

1212:

I will answer Noetica's points later, unless you are tired of having this discussion on your talk-page. I proposed the move to see what the opinion was among those not regulars of

2024: 1495: 1394:. Not that I wish to sound rude, but not much experience is needed, all I want to do is move files from incorrect spelling or hard to read names to better names. Thanks Graeme, — 669: 638: 209:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

946:

Editors dedicated to maintaining and extending the rational standards of consistency that are already in place throughout Knowledge (XXG) (Tony and myself, as it happens); and

1903:

Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.

953:, who favours a minimal manual of style that will be little more than an essay, and who has a documented history of manipulating local sentiment for such political ends. 1284:

I also believe the shocking heresy that what MOS says is determined by its words, as interpreted by consensus. It is for Tony and Noetica to say what they believe.

1235:, if it is actually about the name of the article. Then others can join in too. But if you want to talk about my closing of the discussion, then here is fine. 1033:

address this matter. I am disappointed that you ignore the points I make about this. Have you surveyed the issues in depth, as I and other MOS specialists have?

1325: 1137:. Please: answer my questions, or explain why they do not warrant your attention as a responsible administrator. Some of those questions, quoted from above: 346: 1133:

Graeme, I too would like answers to my direct questions, above. They have a serious bearing on procedural correctness and on the role of guidelines such as

66:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than 1789:

P.S. - Cheers for the Brett/Shane Lee reference, i was actually in the middle of hunting for one when i spotted you had found one first, so Thanks.

730: 917: 824: 696:

Many thanks for getting back to me on my Talk page. I have a few thoughts that I'd like to share. The initial impetus for requesting was the memo

138:

If I deleted your article, it may be possible for me to restore it. Please post a message for reconsideration of the deletion. and you can read

353: 1351:, to reflect the consensus of discussions of Knowledge (XXG) style in practice; if it did, it might well actually reduce disputes. But instead, 486:

Dear both, can you give me some advice on amending the article to comply to your concerns. I would really appreciate feedback from both of you.

1311:

That's not how English works; otherwise we would be discussing this now in simplified spelling and Shaw's improved apostrophe-free punctuation.

139: 1993: 1808:

I cannot see why all my other articles and posts are ok but I've tried to get this guy up and running and it always gets deleted. This page,

1541:

Message added 07:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1980: 450: 132: 129: 126: 123: 547:

I have would like to be able to move files to help other users on Knowledge (XXG) who do not have this ability. Please accept my request.

838:

Currently these and the items included under them accord closely with project-wide practice, as we see it manifest in this quick sample:

1012:

First, a modification of what I say above. Of course there were other participants than those I name above. But the arguments raised by

120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 105: 102: 99: 96: 829: 175:

It was soooo nice after your sprotection. Now that it's unprotected, the IP's are at it again. Could you please sprotect it once more?

431: 933: 1958: 602: 577: 555: 392: 523:

be searching for sources on Friday, it may be next week when they go online so please bear with me. Thankyou for your co-operation

46: 52:

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than

1484: 1477: 862: 63: 1324:

Their conduct is another matter, to be dealt with in other venues. I had hoped that Noetica would not join Tony's cries of

1282:

whether a policy or guideline is an accurate description of best practice is determined by the community through consensus.

541: 1817: 1094:

policy suggests that the typography of such an article name should be changed from dash to hyphen? I await your response.

2044: 733: 336: 316: 296: 259: 912: 852: 1976: 1653:, not at all, I do not see any such declaration in any of the historic comments, do you still have doubts about that? 880: 1599: 1029:

fits with spelling and with other parameters of style is complex and technical. The most relevant policy page does

443: 2040: 2033: 1733: 842: 2062: 2048: 2013: 2006: 1991: 1753: 1706: 1634: 1551: 1459: 1240: 1232: 1118: 1000: 995:

I do not want to consider all the other articles, otherwise there may have to be a move discussion on those too.

17: 1154:

I do not want to consider all the other articles, otherwise there may have to be a move discussion on those too.

1038:

I do not want to consider all the other articles, otherwise there may have to be a move discussion on those too.

847: 153:

considered a notable NW artist and re-upload. Thanks again and I hope your wiki-break is a nice one. Sincerely,

1813: 684: 658: 651: 590:

I would like for you to review my request now and please turn your attention to this discussion between me and

531: 512: 494: 454: 857: 1900:: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable. 1677: 1306:

It has consensus of Knowledge (XXG) editors (in general, not just some half-dozen at a guideline talk page).

727: 332: 312: 292: 255: 240: 885: 419: 380: 1588: 950: 949:

One editor who is bent on disabling MOS in its role to head off countless disputes at countless articles:

427: 875: 870: 527: 508: 490: 471:

Thank you for rightly declining the speedy. Hmm. Lets hope the article gets up to speed as little stub.--

1954: 1929: 1911: 606: 581: 559: 388: 158: 1356: 1253: 1213: 963: 423: 384: 2047:. Some concerned user asked me to do so, but as I'm not an admin so this is out of expertise. Thanks 1984: 1749: 1702: 1658: 1630: 1372: 1360: 1333: 1236: 1221: 1114: 996: 802: 465: 1896: 677: 631: 624: 591: 1348: 1281: 1794: 1774: 1673: 236: 220: 1454:; i was thinking it would be same as moving the article but its clearly not as i don't find any 1391: 1387: 1303:

It is recommended by a substantial number of reliable sources (that is, outside Knowledge (XXG))

2069: 2055: 2020: 1995: 1965: 1933: 1915: 1875: 1852: 1821: 1798: 1778: 1757: 1710: 1687: 1681: 1662: 1650: 1638: 1619: 1521: 1491: 1466: 1435: 1411: 1376: 1337: 1275: 1262: 1244: 1225: 1204: 1191: 1122: 1107: 1082: 1069: 1004: 986: 973: 780: 753: 736: 706: 686: 665: 610: 585: 563: 535: 516: 498: 480: 476: 458: 435: 396: 365: 340: 320: 300: 286: 263: 244: 224: 192: 162: 77: 1832: 943:"Local" editors, typically doing good but narrowly focused work on that and similar articles; 30: 1951: 1925: 1907: 595: 570: 548: 361: 282: 154: 1924:

levels. Congratulations, and thank you for your many contributions to the Knowledge (XXG)!

1716:

No problem... I respect your decision. The objetive of the user(s) its promote their small

1166: 1134: 1050: 1654: 1516: 1368: 1329: 1217: 1102: 939:

There were three kinds of participant in the recent discussion for the article you moved:

775: 966:

to the request we are making, since the general issue has been discussed there recently.

806: 1359:

and induced two of the dozen MOS regulars to open a new dispute over the spelling of

923:

Or this, where a space is involved in the element to the left or right of the en dash:

168: 1149:

In particular, I request once more your response to these points (quoted from above):

891:

On and on the list could go. Have a look at the many articles under these categories:

1867: 1844: 1790: 1770: 1611: 1580: 1427: 1403: 746: 699: 216: 189: 186: 181: 176: 1156:" But avoiding repeated wrangling and churning at myriad pages is a core reason for 1040:" But avoiding repeated wrangling and churning at myriad pages is a core reason for 1785:

edit - pointing to the fact his/her initial efforts appear to be blatant vandalism.

1561: 1025:

appropriate that competing guides, external to the Project, should take precedence.

1013: 472: 1887: 569:] was put there by accident because it was the file name that was on my computer. 205:

WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for Creation for a

1741: 1861: 1838: 1605: 1574: 1421: 1397: 357: 278: 1509: 1252:

I proposed the move to see what the opinion was among those not regulars of

1095: 768: 1804:

I own the copyright to that text. I wrote it. Please stop deleting that page.

1701:"? Just autoreferences... If en.wiki admits trash and spam, i will respect. 1626: 785:

I'll join in here also, if that's all right. Graeme, yes: most sources have

1835:

for proper templates that will satisfy the bot, very fussy bot at that. —

1745: 1602:? Tim seems to have missed my message and is currently offline. Cheers, — 1809: 747: 700: 1538:

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email; you've got mail!

927:

Items included under Category:Treaties of the United States, like

277:

edits without thinking. (Actually, I find that encouraging ... )

1985: 311:

me! I only forgot that I requested to be blocked. So block me.

25: 745:

I would also like to have some feedback on the above, thanks.

449:

How 'bout blocking the account as a username violation then?

2027:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2005: 1886: 1531: 1498:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1476: 672:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

650: 641:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

623: 719:

a file mover at Commons, have experience with files, and

1943: 1698: 1649:

Hi, I am not seeing that PD is the correct license for

1600:

Template_talk:Did_you_know#Digital_Education_Revolution

1543: 1297:

I do not accept any "rational" rule of English, unless

908:

They are overwhelmingly in this well-entrenched style:

274: 1725: 1721: 1446:Hi, could you please elaborate me the procedure of 2012:Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at 1483:Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at 657:Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at 630:Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at 144:please add your talk at the bottom of the page: 354:tl:Philippine School of Business Administration 1367:half-educated. If you want more, let me know. 834:Category:Treaties of the Mexican–American War 8: 352:I recreated the article for the school from 347:Philippine School of Business Administration 254:Can you block me until February 27? Thanks. 1894:There has been a major revision of the the 1810:http://en.wikipedia.org/Steve_Edge_(lawyer) 291:Why are you planning on having me blocked? 797:. The following sources mix their styles, 1645:File talk:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG 1280:Yes, I have "the temerity to admit" that 2061:Thanks Graeme for your prompt response. 1347:The role of MOS should be, according to 930:Category:Mexico – United States treaties 212:here are the questions for the interview 1975:Could you please provide a copy of the 1858:I've replied to your message. Cheers, — 898:Category:Bilateral relations of Austria 85:ki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett/archive_14 75:. The original talk page is located at 1300:It is actually found in English usage. 1945:Thanks for the quick switch-flicking 542:Knowledge (XXG):Request for filemover 7: 1981:User talk:SunCountryGuy01/Editnotice 1542: 1231:It would be best if this was on the 1173:your advice, to remedy that problem? 1057:your advice, to remedy that problem? 619:speedy delete tagging a page as spam 918:1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement 825:Battles of the Mexican–American War 2039:Hi Graeme, will you please delete 1442:Procedure for file moving/renaming 24: 1764:Albion Park Rail, New South Wales 1977:User talk:Gabriele449/Editnotice 1485:Bill william compton's talk page 1363:, within days of your closure. 901:Category:Canada–Mexico relations 198:WP Articles for Creation in the 29: 2064: 2050: 1949: 1461: 1152:Most tellingly, you say this: " 1036:Most tellingly, you say this: " 904:Category:Mexico–Spain relations 2043:article as it is duplicate of 1693:Hi Graeme. Did you really had 1503:You need to resign as an admin 830:Mexican–American War campaigns 1: 1594:Hi, quick request for DYK nom 1390:and could you see my req. at 1386:I replied to your message at 1216:, and I think I am answered. 934:Mexico – United States border 821:Category:Mexican–American War 397:23:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC) 366:16:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 341:01:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 321:18:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC) 301:01:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC) 287:14:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC) 264:05:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 245:13:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC) 2045:Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College 2041:Deen Dayal Upadhayay College 2034:Deen Dayal Upadhayay College 1868: 1845: 1612: 1581: 1547:at any time by removing the 1428: 1404: 1259: 1256:, and I think I am answered. 1188: 1066: 970: 895:Category:Bilateral relations 762:Move of Mexican–American War 607: 603: 582: 578: 560: 556: 225:02:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC) 193:23:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 163:16:48, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 2014:SunCountryGuy01's talk page 1862: 1839: 1606: 1575: 1422: 1398: 1020:appeal to general matters, 596: 571: 549: 148:Mattthew Skenandore article 2086: 2070:02:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC) 2056:17:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC) 2021:23:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1996:22:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1966:06:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 1934:06:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC) 1916:06:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC) 1876:07:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC) 1853:22:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 1822:13:59, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 1799:20:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 1779:12:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 1758:11:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 1718:community/discussion board 1711:10:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 1682:21:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 1663:12:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 1639:10:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 1620:10:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 1589:07:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 1522:08:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC) 1492:04:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC) 1467:15:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 1436:11:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC) 1412:10:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC) 1377:03:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 1338:23:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1276:22:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1245:20:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1226:16:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 1205:23:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1123:11:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1108:11:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 1083:22:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC) 1005:20:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC) 987:16:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC) 867:Category:Texas–Indian Wars 793:, and some do indeed have 781:13:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC) 754:23:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC) 737:00:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 707:00:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 687:01:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC) 666:21:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC) 659:Alpha Quadrant's talk page 444:User talk:Orionsocialmedia 1736:. Now its doing a bit of 1526: 863:Meusebach–Comanche Treaty 611:21:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC) 586:22:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 564:22:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 536:16:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 517:14:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 499:10:21, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 481:16:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 459:13:06, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 436:20:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC) 18:User talk:Graeme Bartlett 1598:Could you please review 807:"Mexican American War" 2 803:"Mexican American War" 1 305:Actually, (laughs) that 140:Why was my page deleted? 1920:Actually, you advanced 1697:the references of the " 1382:Replied to your message 913:Austria–Italy relations 853:Philippine–American War 2010: 1891: 1536: 1481: 1450:. I got this right of 881:Finnish–Russian border 655: 628: 2009: 1890: 1535: 1480: 1355:Noetica has gone to 1144:MOS specialists have? 843:Polish–Lithuanian War 654: 632:Banaticus's talk page 627: 2065:Bill william compton 2051:Bill william compton 1738:cross-wiki promotion 1625:Getting closer, but 1462:Bill william compton 1448:file moving/renaming 1361:Mexican-American War 1187:Best wishes to you.– 1065:Best wishes to you.– 969:Best wishes to you.– 848:Spanish–American War 795:Mexican–American War 791:Mexican American War 787:Mexican-American War 230:Redirection of typos 1882:Service award level 1814:Yourjourneyrealised 1668:What?No file Mover? 1627:missed by that much 858:Comanche–Mexico War 171:bio vandalism again 2025:remove this notice 2011: 1892: 1863:Ancient Apparition 1840:Ancient Apparition 1607:Ancient Apparition 1576:Ancient Apparition 1544:remove this notice 1537: 1496:remove this notice 1482: 1423:Ancient Apparition 1399:Ancient Apparition 886:Iran–Contra affair 670:remove this notice 656: 639:remove this notice 629: 415:Sincerely, -Paul 333:MickWithoutGlasses 313:MickWithoutGlasses 293:MickWithoutGlasses 256:MickWithoutGlasses 62:you are viewing a 1375: 1336: 1272: 1233:article talk page 1224: 1201: 1079: 983: 876:Colombia–Peru War 871:Texas–Indian Wars 692:File move request 439: 422:comment added by 400: 383:comment added by 371:Needing some help 250:Pleeeeeeeeeeease? 95:Older talk is in 93: 92: 2077: 2067: 2066: 2053: 2052: 2028: 1989: 1964: 1961: 1948: 1874: 1870: 1864: 1851: 1847: 1841: 1618: 1614: 1608: 1587: 1583: 1577: 1568: 1566: 1560: 1556: 1550: 1546: 1534: 1519: 1514: 1499: 1464: 1463: 1434: 1430: 1424: 1418:much Graeme :) — 1410: 1406: 1400: 1371: 1332: 1273: 1270: 1220: 1202: 1199: 1105: 1100: 1080: 1077: 984: 981: 799:as we should not 778: 773: 751: 704: 682: 673: 642: 608: 604: 600: 583: 579: 575: 561: 557: 553: 438: 416: 399: 377: 184: 179: 89: 86: 83: 80: 74: 73: 70: 61: 59: 56: 45: 44: 41: 33: 26: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2063: 2049: 2037: 2032:Please delete 2029: 2018: 2003: 1973: 1959: 1946: 1941: 1905: 1884: 1859: 1836: 1829: 1806: 1766: 1750:Leandromartinez 1742:simple:Tugatech 1703:Leandromartinez 1691: 1670: 1647: 1631:Graeme Bartlett 1603: 1596: 1572: 1569: 1564: 1558: 1554: 1552:You've got mail 1548: 1540: 1532: 1529: 1527:You've got mail 1517: 1510: 1505: 1500: 1489: 1474: 1460: 1444: 1419: 1395: 1384: 1369:Septentrionalis 1330:Septentrionalis 1269: 1266: 1237:Graeme Bartlett 1218:Septentrionalis 1198: 1195: 1115:Graeme Bartlett 1103: 1096: 1076: 1073: 997:Graeme Bartlett 980: 977: 776: 769: 764: 694: 678: 674: 663: 648: 643: 636: 621: 545: 469: 466:SomersTotalKare 447: 417: 406: 378: 373: 350: 328: 271: 252: 232: 203: 182: 177: 173: 150: 84: 81: 79:https://en.wiki 78: 76: 71: 68: 67: 57: 54: 53: 42: 39: 38: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2083: 2081: 2073: 2072: 2036: 2030: 2019:Message added 2017: 2004: 2002: 1999: 1972: 1969: 1940: 1937: 1902: 1901: 1897:Service Awards 1885: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1828: 1825: 1805: 1802: 1787: 1786: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1732:and many many 1720:. Some links: 1690: 1685: 1674:Damirgraffiti 1669: 1666: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1595: 1592: 1539: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1504: 1501: 1490:Message added 1488: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1383: 1380: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1267: 1260: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1196: 1189: 1185: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1160:and uniformly 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1074: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1044:and uniformly 1034: 1026: 978: 971: 955: 954: 947: 944: 937: 936: 931: 928: 921: 920: 915: 906: 905: 902: 899: 896: 889: 888: 883: 878: 873: 868: 865: 860: 855: 850: 845: 836: 835: 832: 827: 822: 763: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 740: 739: 693: 690: 680:Alpha Quadrant 664:Message added 662: 649: 647: 644: 635: 622: 620: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 544: 539: 528:Kingswinford92 521: 509:Kingswinford92 491:Kingswinford92 485: 468: 462: 451:69.181.249.189 446: 441: 405: 402: 372: 369: 349: 344: 327: 324: 273:It seems that 270: 267: 251: 248: 231: 228: 202: 196: 172: 169:John Steinbeck 166: 149: 146: 91: 90: 51: 47:user talk page 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2082: 2071: 2068: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2054: 2046: 2042: 2035: 2031: 2026: 2022: 2015: 2008: 2000: 1998: 1997: 1994: 1992: 1990: 1988: 1982: 1978: 1970: 1968: 1967: 1962: 1956: 1953: 1944: 1938: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1918: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1904: 1899: 1898: 1889: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1871: 1865: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1848: 1842: 1834: 1826: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1803: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1748:)... :-) s. 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1729: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1667: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1615: 1609: 1601: 1593: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1584: 1578: 1563: 1553: 1545: 1524: 1523: 1520: 1515: 1513: 1502: 1497: 1493: 1486: 1479: 1471: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1431: 1425: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1407: 1401: 1393: 1389: 1381: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1364: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1310: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1265: 1264: 1257: 1255: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1206: 1194: 1193: 1186: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1171: 1168: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1148: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1101: 1099: 1092: 1091: 1084: 1072: 1071: 1064: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1002: 998: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 976: 975: 967: 965: 961: 952: 948: 945: 942: 941: 940: 935: 932: 929: 926: 925: 924: 919: 916: 914: 911: 910: 909: 903: 900: 897: 894: 893: 892: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 874: 872: 869: 866: 864: 861: 859: 856: 854: 851: 849: 846: 844: 841: 840: 839: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 820: 819: 818: 814: 810: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 783: 782: 779: 774: 772: 761: 755: 752: 750: 744: 743: 742: 741: 738: 735: 732: 729: 724: 723: 718: 717: 711: 710: 709: 708: 705: 703: 697: 691: 689: 688: 685: 683: 681: 671: 667: 660: 653: 645: 640: 633: 626: 618: 612: 609: 605: 601: 599: 593: 589: 588: 587: 584: 580: 576: 574: 568: 567: 566: 565: 562: 558: 554: 552: 543: 540: 538: 537: 533: 529: 524: 519: 518: 514: 510: 505: 501: 500: 496: 492: 487: 483: 482: 478: 474: 467: 463: 461: 460: 456: 452: 445: 442: 440: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 413: 409: 403: 401: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 370: 368: 367: 363: 359: 355: 348: 345: 343: 342: 338: 334: 325: 323: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 303: 302: 298: 294: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275:not everybody 268: 266: 265: 261: 257: 249: 247: 246: 242: 238: 237:Peter coxhead 229: 227: 226: 222: 218: 214: 213: 208: 201: 197: 195: 194: 191: 188: 185: 180: 170: 167: 165: 164: 160: 156: 147: 145: 142: 141: 136: 134: 131: 128: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 98: 87: 65: 50: 48: 35: 32: 28: 27: 19: 2038: 1986: 1974: 1942: 1921: 1919: 1906: 1895: 1893: 1860: 1837: 1830: 1807: 1788: 1767: 1737: 1727: 1717: 1694: 1692: 1671: 1651:this picture 1648: 1604: 1597: 1573: 1570: 1511: 1506: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1445: 1420: 1396: 1385: 1365: 1352: 1346: 1261: 1251: 1211: 1190: 1181: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1097: 1068: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1030: 1021: 1017: 1014:User:Xession 972: 968: 959: 956: 938: 922: 907: 890: 837: 815: 811: 798: 794: 790: 789:, some have 786: 784: 770: 765: 748: 721: 720: 715: 714: 701: 695: 679: 675: 597: 572: 550: 546: 525: 520: 506: 502: 488: 484: 470: 448: 424:Pauljackson1 418:— Preceding 414: 410: 407: 379:— Preceding 374: 351: 329: 307: 306: 304: 290: 272: 253: 233: 210: 206: 204: 199: 174: 151: 143: 137: 94: 82:pedia.org/wi 36: 1971:Edit notice 1960:most serene 1926:Herostratus 1908:Herostratus 1746:es:Tugatech 1432:• 10:56pm • 1016:and others 960:punctuation 722:understands 408:Hi Graeme, 385:Big D Shire 155:Curlyharpy1 64:mirror site 2023:. You can 1983:. Thanks. 1872:• 6:39pm • 1869:Champagne? 1849:• 9:55am • 1846:Champagne? 1655:Off2riorob 1616:• 9:46pm • 1613:Champagne? 1585:• 6:47pm • 1582:Champagne? 1494:. You can 1452:file mover 1429:Champagne? 1408:• 9:23pm • 1405:Champagne? 1373:PMAnderson 1334:PMAnderson 1222:PMAnderson 951:PMAnderson 668:. You can 598:Gabesta449 573:Gabesta449 551:Gabesta449 326:Because... 135:archives. 37:This is a 1827:Hi Graeme 1567:template. 1349:WP:POLICY 592:Acalamari 2001:Talkback 1979:page on 1952:Treasury 1791:Nath1991 1771:Nath1991 1722:Tugatech 1688:Tugatech 1472:Talkback 1392:WP:RFP/A 1388:WP:RFP/F 1326:sabotage 1162:applying 1046:applying 1009:Graeme: 749:Hohenloh 728:Terrence 702:Hohenloh 646:Talkback 637:You can 432:contribs 420:unsigned 393:contribs 381:unsigned 217:Mabeenot 207:Signpost 200:Signpost 1833:WP:FURG 1734:attemps 1699:article 1271:oetica! 1200:oetica! 1078:oetica! 982:oetica! 734:Phillip 716:already 676:Reply. 473:Shirt58 1695:opened 1518:(talk) 1357:WT:MOS 1254:WT:MOS 1214:WT:MOS 1167:WP:MOS 1158:having 1135:WP:MOS 1104:(talk) 1051:WP:MOS 1042:having 964:WT:MOS 777:(talk) 464:About 358:Naraht 279:Pdfpdf 269:Smile? 1987:Jessy 190:arris 72:pedia 58:pedia 43:pedia 16:< 1930:talk 1912:talk 1818:talk 1795:talk 1775:talk 1754:talk 1726:Tuga 1707:talk 1678:talk 1659:talk 1635:talk 1512:Tony 1456:Move 1353:Tony 1241:talk 1183:now. 1119:talk 1098:Tony 1001:talk 771:Tony 532:talk 513:talk 495:talk 477:talk 455:talk 428:talk 389:talk 362:talk 337:talk 317:talk 297:talk 283:talk 260:talk 241:talk 221:talk 159:talk 69:Wiki 55:Wiki 40:Wiki 1955:Tag 1922:two 1730:ech 1562:ygm 1557:or 1031:not 731:and 308:was 1963:─╢ 1950:╟─ 1947::) 1939:Ta 1932:) 1914:) 1866:• 1843:• 1820:) 1797:) 1777:) 1756:) 1744:, 1724:, 1709:) 1680:) 1661:) 1637:) 1629:! 1610:• 1579:• 1565:}} 1559:{{ 1555:}} 1549:{{ 1426:• 1402:• 1328:. 1274:– 1243:) 1203:– 1121:) 1081:– 1022:or 1018:do 1003:) 985:– 809:. 805:; 801:: 594:. 534:) 526:-- 515:) 507:-- 497:) 489:-- 479:) 457:) 434:) 430:• 395:) 391:• 364:) 339:) 319:) 299:) 285:) 262:) 243:) 223:) 161:) 133:13 130:12 127:11 124:10 2016:. 1957:► 1928:( 1910:( 1816:( 1793:( 1773:( 1752:( 1740:( 1728:T 1705:( 1676:( 1657:( 1633:( 1571:— 1487:. 1268:N 1263:⊥ 1239:( 1197:N 1192:⊥ 1117:( 1075:N 1070:⊥ 999:( 979:N 974:⊥ 726:— 661:. 634:. 530:( 511:( 493:( 475:( 453:( 426:( 404:3 387:( 360:( 335:( 315:( 295:( 281:( 258:( 239:( 219:( 187:H 183:B 178:S 157:( 121:9 118:8 115:7 112:6 109:5 106:4 103:3 100:2 97:1 88:. 60:, 49:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index