375:
the suggested word count limit. To take the argument to the extreme, the WP article is not meant to be a substitute for watching the film. I agree with you on the final sentence, though: it helps to know that
Martins is risking missing his flight. Perhaps this is the one motivational detail that deserves to make it into this summary, due to the length and intensity of the final scene. I will try to re-insert this fact in the most objective possible way. If I were you I wouldn't worry too much about the disagreements between editors, since everybody in this case is behaving constructively and the differences in opinion are minor. This is a picnic compared to some articles I have worked on! --
306:]. This was reverted without explanation; when I asked for one on the talk page, pointing out that "Holly has made some sacrifice to stay behind after the funeral, which makes snubbing of him the more cutting", I was told "It's a summary, not a blow by blow account of what has happened in each scene". I thought it over for over a day, then came and reread the "Plot" and attempted to at least clarify those points of the plot which seemed unnecessarily befogged by the cutting process, thus
32:
293:. At the moment there's something of an aching disagreement between a number of editors (of whom I would now include myself) and an apparently well-esconced though relatively new arrival over the article - specifically its "Plot". I have been impressed by what I have seen of your sensitive editing of the "Plot" of
374:
I've looked more closely at the recent edits and the present summary is quite good. I understand your desire to communicate the atmosphere as well as the action, but many editors will consider this to be subjective and I understand why they have reverted your additions even though you are well within
327:
Would you mind having a look at what is happening with this article, and the "Plot" section in particular, and letting me know if there's some sensible way of improving this situation; or if you think I am going about things the wrong way, do let me know. Sorry for having gone on at some length about
174:
Hi, Heron, we've not 'met' before but I see you were on Aesop and Aesop's Fables today performing some very canny edits which deserve complimenting. WP needs more like you with an eye for detail and the gift of succinct redrafting. I see you've already been given a barnstar; consider this as a quick
48:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if
343:
Hi Alfie. Films like this deserve our best effort. I shall certainly have a look at the article and see if I can help, although I am a bit busy right now. My first thought, without having looked at the article recently, is that perhaps we need a mechanical plot summary followed by a section on
238:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
313:
Several past editors, who have similarly attempted to make the plot reflect the character of the film rather than an unhelpful and jejune summary of no use to either newcomer or aficionado, have evidently been driven away by an obdurate policy to make
389:
Well, thanks for having a look - and I approve of your amendment at the end. It did need something more there; I wonder if perhaps I might return and reinstate Harry's "disappearance" following the doorway scene. Anyway, thanks again.
234:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
318:
appear a mere action film: sadly this includes
HarringtonSmith, who I've never had the pleasure to work with but whose work I have discovered through looking at
135:
358:
Thank you for getting back so quickly about this. I think your expert input would be very welcome, though I understand you are very busy at present. All best,
226:
52:
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created
239:
140:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
85:
81:
65:
61:
304:
article, which has become, IMHO, starved to the point of losing some of its essential features. First, I tried to amend the final sentence thus:
247:
89:
190:
Shucks, thanks
Mzilikazi1939. On a big, messy project like Knowledge (XXG), a perfectionist's work is never done! I hope we 'meet' again. --
243:
221:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) is acceptable. Please go to
131:
287:
Hello. Sorry to appear "out of the blue" but I'm trying to find a neutral outsider to take a view on what's happening with
73:
49:
the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
235:
180:
69:
40:
395:
363:
333:
44:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
257:
127:
308:]. This was almost totally reverted, save for some trifling points of punctuation and a word or two
222:
213:
176:
344:
interpretations. The latter must of course be referenced and not just the editor's opinion. --
218:
391:
359:
329:
246:
and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
380:
349:
294:
272:
253:
195:
159:
111:
17:
320:
289:
154:
Can't remember where this image came from so I'm not going to oppose its deletion. --
328:
this. I would be most grateful if you are able to offer any advice or assistance.
324:- evidently he had considerable responsibility in giving it what quality it has.
300:
I am, I guess, the latest arrival in the editing process of the "Plot" section of
58:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
88:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the
31:
376:
345:
268:
191:
155:
141:
107:
93:
45:
267:
I've added a rationale statement. Please LMK if I need to do any more. --
399:
384:
367:
353:
337:
276:
261:
199:
184:
163:
148:
115:
100:
217:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under
78:
the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
106:
I undeleted that image and added a GFDL-self tag to that image. --
30:
53:
242:. If the file is already gone, you can still make a
283:
A second opinion, or some advice if you can, please
8:
27:File source problem with File:Clovehitch.png
206:Non-free rationale for File:OED2-CD-1.png
211:Thanks for uploading or contributing to
297:and thought you might be able to help.
126:A file that you uploaded or altered,
7:
122:File:Iec or.png listed for deletion
132:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion
24:
175:sleeve-brush to keep it shining!
248:Media copyright questions page
90:Media copyright questions page
1:
277:12:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
262:11:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
400:22:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
385:21:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
368:11:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
354:09:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
338:00:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
240:criteria for speedy deletion
164:08:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
116:08:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
62:criteria for speedy deletion
225:, and edit it to include a
149:21:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
101:19:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
418:
223:the file description page
219:non-free content criteria
200:16:50, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
185:15:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
38:Thank you for uploading
244:request for undeletion
60:per Knowledge (XXG)'s
35:
130:, has been listed at
34:
41:File:Clovehitch.png
227:non-free rationale
214:File:OED2-CD-1.png
68:. If the image is
54:in your upload log
36:
134:. Please see the
409:
236:my contributions
146:
98:
417:
416:
412:
411:
410:
408:
407:
406:
295:Brief Encounter
285:
208:
172:
142:
128:File:Iec or.png
124:
94:
82:speedy deletion
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:User talk:Heron
12:
11:
5:
415:
413:
405:
404:
403:
402:
372:
371:
370:
284:
281:
280:
279:
207:
204:
203:
202:
171:
170:Wise old Aesop
168:
167:
166:
123:
120:
119:
118:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
414:
401:
397:
393:
388:
387:
386:
382:
378:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
342:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
325:
323:
322:
321:The Third Man
317:
316:The Third Man
311:
309:
307:
305:
303:
302:The Third Man
298:
296:
292:
291:
290:The Third Man
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
231:
230:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
188:
187:
186:
182:
178:
177:Mzilikazi1939
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
147:
145:
139:
138:
133:
129:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
104:
103:
102:
99:
97:
92:. Thank you.
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
50:
47:
43:
42:
33:
26:
19:
326:
319:
315:
312:
301:
299:
288:
286:
233:
232:
212:
210:
209:
173:
143:
136:
125:
95:
77:
57:
51:
39:
37:
392:Alfietucker
360:Alfietucker
330:Alfietucker
252:Thank you.
70:copyrighted
254:Sfan00 IMG
137:discussion
84:criterion
46:copyright
74:non-free
377:Heron
346:Heron
269:Heron
192:Heron
156:Heron
144:Kelly
108:Heron
96:Kelly
16:<
396:talk
381:talk
364:talk
350:talk
334:talk
273:talk
258:talk
196:talk
181:talk
160:talk
112:talk
80:per
72:and
310:].
398:)
383:)
366:)
352:)
336:)
275:)
260:)
229:.
198:)
183:)
162:)
114:)
86:F7
76:,
66:F4
64:,
56:.
394:(
379:(
362:(
348:(
332:(
271:(
256:(
250:.
194:(
179:(
158:(
110:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
