Knowledge

User talk:HinduPundit

Source đź“ť

495:
why I didn't put it on the talk page first. But happy to see that someone else cares. The Shikharband vs Shikharbaddha issue is actually something that had originally caught my interest, etymologically. I am not sure of your own etymological background, so I won’t get into the linguistic details of the validity of the instrumental tatpurusha samas rather than the genitive variety in this case, but suffice it to say that shikharbaddha is the correct usage, and if you have any etymological arguments against that, I would be very interested to hear them. But, for the present Knowledge discussion, rather than the etymological route, perhaps I would point to a number of scholars who have used the “Shikharbaddha” terminology, rather than the “shikharbandh” variant in peer-reviewed journals and books in the English language. The references I have listed at the bottom of the article have mentioned some of these scholars (I could also add Rudert and Nassar, just to mention two others who have used shikharbaddha). Moreover, none of the scholars have used the “Shikharbandh” term in any peer-reviewed journal or book. I thought this point would be clear from my ample citations. So, basically, either “shikharbandh” is an error, or a local or regional colloquialism, like “ain’t” for “isn’t”, but proper term is shikharbaddha, and that is what should be used.
535:
reverts with no edit summaries - violating Knowledge policies despite being told by multiple editors. The user(s) themselves agree to edit warring. Such behavior, has made it difficult to work with them in a collaborative spirit. If you feel strong about such undue behavior, I encourage you to voice your opinions on his/her talk page. Your support can help reduce further attacks and help prevent such editing. Thanks!!
576:
Do you know anything about Priyadarshan "The bluebook" swami leaving baps controversially. He made copies of documents and stoles some items and then left to another sect. I have some information on this and am going to forward it to Times of India and the Indian Express but needed some more details.
554:
Since you have so much time to monitor articles, would you mind improving the following articles? It was requested by a user earlier. Could you assit in updating the Gopalanand Swami article. I suggest we have three sections on how each of three main sect's views him with an expanded biography. You
494:
Thank you, Around the Globe, for the interest. Actually, the reason for making the move without discussing it on the talk page first is quite simple – the article has been a stub for almost 2 years, with no edits and minimal page views, so I thought no one would really be interested in it, which is
534:
Additionally, in light of the dialogue that is taking place on the BAPS talk page, I observed lack of participation by these editors. They fail to engage and address the concerns raised by other editors in the talk page discussions and instead choose to ignore these discussions and engage in blind
555:
seem educated with BAPS so I look forward to your updates. I was curious, is there any textual basis in core writing that Gopalanand was a mukta? Additionally, to my amazement, a Chino Hills BAPS Mandir was recently built and there is no wiki page to establish that.
43:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place 478:
without mentioning it on the talk page? You cite this spelling being used in the article for the change - however its you who changed the spelling in the article as well!
65:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Knowledge, you might want to consider being "
168: 212: 74: 153: 190: 578: 62: 523:
I saw you as one of the editors being attacked on the BAPS Talk page. Would you kindly comment on User:141.217.233.69's talk page (here
447: 40: 61: 399: 208: 186: 263: 203: 363: 313: 376: 331: 317: 126: 120: 439: 300: 395: 291: 241: 237: 130: 528: 259: 220: 582: 524: 486: 421: 417: 246: 199: 339: 228: 195: 326: 295: 224: 112: 66: 34: 540: 434: 385: 381: 372: 368: 70: 52: 577:
I know baps members where told to keep this quiet so your response will let me know your intentions.
562: 512: 430: 267: 233: 56: 480: 322: 308: 254: 159: 471: 304: 163: 116: 391: 358: 78: 536: 496: 82: 77:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
558: 443: 531:) if you feel that this user has been engaging in any form of personal attacks to you? 425: 250: 73:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
335: 148: 586: 566: 544: 504: 488: 87: 278: 99: 27: 470:
Hi, just wanting to know why you made the move from
81:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 55:and ask your question there. Please remember to 527:) and User:141.217.203.131's talk page (here 8: 69:" by a more experienced editor or joining a 16:Hello, this is HinduPundit's talk page. 519:Personal Attacks and Disruptive Editing 7: 14: 60: 23: 169:Request administrator attention 1: 213:Biographies of living persons 113:The five pillars of Knowledge 95: 238:Policy for non-free content 154:New contributors' help page 88:13:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 602: 587:15:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 567:14:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC) 149:Frequently Asked Questions 59:on talk pages by clicking 545:03:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 529:User_talk:141.217.203.131 525:User_talk:141.217.233.69 505:23:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 500: 489:06:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 364:Help develop an article 178:Policies and Guidelines 209:What Knowledge is not 187:Neutral point of view 513:Shikharbaddha Mandir 511:Discussion moved to 476:Shikharbaddha Mandir 386:Translating articles 296:Adopt-a-user program 264:Conflict of interest 204:No original research 32:Hello, HinduPundit! 314:No personal attacks 572:Priyadarshan swami 485: 472:Shikharband Mandir 466:Shikharband Mandir 382:Join a WikiProject 377:Requested articles 359:Be bold in editing 318:Resolving disputes 121:Your first article 41:your contributions 479: 463: 462: 459: 458: 455: 454: 301:Assume good faith 275: 274: 225:Three-revert rule 94: 93: 593: 550:Gopalanand Swami 483: 482:Around The Globe 440:Useful templates 292:Community Portal 279: 242:Image use policy 191:Reliable sources 100: 96: 85: 64: 49: 48: 28: 24: 601: 600: 596: 595: 594: 592: 591: 590: 574: 552: 521: 481: 468: 410: 350: 323:Build consensus 284: 260:Deletion policy 221:Manual of Style 179: 141: 131:upload an image 105: 104:Getting Started 90: 83: 46: 45: 22: 12: 11: 5: 599: 597: 579:141.217.233.69 573: 570: 551: 548: 520: 517: 508: 507: 467: 464: 461: 460: 457: 456: 453: 452: 451: 450: 437: 428: 412: 411: 408: 405: 404: 403: 402: 388: 379: 366: 352: 351: 348: 345: 344: 343: 342: 329: 320: 311: 298: 286: 285: 282: 276: 273: 272: 271: 270: 257: 247:External links 244: 231: 217: 216: 215: 206: 200:Citing sources 193: 181: 180: 177: 174: 173: 172: 171: 166: 156: 151: 143: 142: 139: 136: 135: 134: 133: 123: 107: 106: 103: 92: 91: 57:sign your name 39:Thank you for 31: 21: 18: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 598: 589: 588: 584: 580: 571: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 549: 547: 546: 542: 538: 532: 530: 526: 518: 516: 515: 514: 506: 502: 498: 493: 492: 491: 490: 487: 484: 477: 473: 465: 449: 445: 441: 438: 436: 432: 429: 427: 423: 419: 416: 415: 414: 413: 409:Miscellaneous 407: 406: 401: 397: 393: 390:Cleaning up: 389: 387: 383: 380: 378: 374: 370: 367: 365: 361: 360: 356: 355: 354: 353: 347: 346: 341: 340:Mailing lists 337: 333: 330: 328: 324: 321: 319: 315: 312: 310: 306: 302: 299: 297: 293: 290: 289: 288: 287: 283:The Community 281: 280: 277: 269: 265: 261: 258: 256: 252: 248: 245: 243: 239: 235: 232: 230: 229:Sock puppetry 226: 222: 219: 218: 214: 210: 207: 205: 201: 197: 196:Verifiability 194: 192: 188: 185: 184: 183: 182: 176: 175: 170: 167: 165: 164:make requests 161: 160:ask questions 157: 155: 152: 150: 147: 146: 145: 144: 138: 137: 132: 128: 124: 122: 118: 114: 111: 110: 109: 108: 102: 101: 98: 97: 89: 86: 80: 76: 72: 68: 63: 58: 54: 50: 42: 38: 37:to Knowledge! 36: 30: 29: 26: 25: 19: 17: 575: 557: 553: 533: 522: 510: 509: 475: 469: 448:User scripts 422:Disambiguity 357: 349:Things to do 336:IRC channels 327:Village pump 140:Getting Help 79:edit summary 44: 33: 15: 537:Kapil.xerox 497:HinduPundit 373:Peer review 369:Maintenance 127:edit a page 84:Redtigerxyz 71:WikiProject 559:Swamifraud 435:Talk pages 431:User pages 418:Categories 268:Notability 234:Copyrights 158:Where to: 47:{{helpme}} 400:Vandalism 309:Etiquette 255:Vandalism 53:talk page 332:Signpost 305:Civility 125:How to: 117:Tutorial 51:on your 392:General 67:adopted 35:Welcome 20:Welcome 444:Tools 426:Stubs 583:talk 563:talk 541:talk 501:talk 396:Spam 251:Spam 75:here 474:to 585:) 565:) 543:) 503:) 446:• 442:• 433:• 424:• 420:• 398:• 394:• 384:• 375:• 371:• 362:• 338:• 334:• 325:• 316:• 307:• 303:• 294:• 266:• 262:• 253:• 249:• 240:• 236:• 227:• 223:• 211:• 202:• 198:• 189:• 162:• 129:• 119:• 115:• 581:( 561:( 539:( 499:(

Index

Welcome
your contributions
talk page
sign your name

adopted
WikiProject
here
edit summary
Redtigerxyz
13:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
The five pillars of Knowledge
Tutorial
Your first article
edit a page
upload an image
Frequently Asked Questions
New contributors' help page
ask questions
make requests
Request administrator attention
Neutral point of view
Reliable sources
Verifiability
Citing sources
No original research
What Knowledge is not
Biographies of living persons
Manual of Style
Three-revert rule

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑