1259:
that I'll loosely call
Northern European mythology, I respect your knowledge and contributions - and undoubted wish to keep exact the pages you monitor. However I do feel that you are being a little harsh on my edit. Neither of the other 2 'Modern Culture' references have citations at all, yet are allowed to stand. I have attempted to place a citation on my addition, but it has been reverted. This feels like multiple standards on the page. As it is, it was very difficult to find a more in-depth citation for the book reference. The author was a medium figure in fantasy literature - referenced in Knowledge itself, but the genre typically does not get covered by extensive literary study and comment from major sources, peer review etc. I'm well aware of the story, having read it several times in my youth, and then making the connections having visited the 'Wayland Smithy' long Barrow near the Uffington Horse and looking into the history. The story is very clearly the source material for the trilogy, with the specifics I mentioned used as the primary plot in the third book. I think it is a reasonable entry.
841:
either have some kind of conflict of interest or they're trolling, not sure which one is worse. Either way they're aggressive and evidently clueless about basic policy such as sourcing, which I've given several notices to them about to no avail. Do you know anything about this family? What's the best approach here? I'm thinking of just wiping the article back to how it was before they came in, when it was at least sourced more properly, but I'm not sure so since you're the only other person I've seen edit it I'd like to ask you about it as you might know more about it than me.
1371:. Yep it's always just about the trickiness of referencing them and also it's quite easy for the list of references in the popular culture section to start dominating the page - in times like this, folks can sometimes start trimming it down based on notability but I'm not clued up enough on wikipedia guidelines to typically do that myself. In terms of referencing, the sfn system may help you - this is how I typically reference and you can just put in the citation the pages of relevance:
1007:(2021, Oxford University Press). On page 18, Lindow discusses how the term is "misleading" and how the jötnar are rarely distinguished by their size. Nonetheless, he continues to use the term for the rest of the book. I can provide more direct quotes if you like and I'll keep an eye out for where else I've seen such discussion. I believe there was a very relevant article I encountered sometime within the past few years that I'm now trying to find again.
1406:
54:
588:
1303:
accurate description of the modern influences of
Northern European lore so I do really appreciate your efforts in this. A potential way to reference it well is to use the books themselves, referencing page numbers and the like. I can't promise it'll get past other wikipedlings with finer toothed combs regarding guidelines on reliable sources and significant modern influences but the approach would make sense to me.
1307:
marker was placed. I won't be wholly consistent on this but I can assure you they are being treated in the same way as your work, I just likely wasn't there to revert them. I revert a lot of unreferenced or insufficiently referenced material - definitely annoying for the writers but essential to keep wikipedia tidy and useful for readers. I hope this helps and makes sense and I'm keen to help where I can!
1451:
917:
1082:). Also we need to be careful with extrapolating this source out into other cultures observing Yule. It seems to be the case that the celebration of Yule gets moved to align with Christmas in England, Norway and so on but these all occured at different times. We also know that Hákon's attempt to Christianise Norway wasn't without bumps so it may have returned to the traditional time afterwards.
1852:). It's a debated and imperfect term but is typically used in this way and it's probably the best we have, especially if we're trying to be succinct :) I think it's also good to use that term as it is very possible (and some will know this for sure) that paganism was suppressed in Roman Britain in areas that became English later on. I hope this makes sense and I'm always happy to help!
1071:"He made a law that the festival of Yule should begin at the same time as Christian people held it, and that every man, under penalty, should brew a meal of malt into ale, and therewith keep the Yule holy as long as it lasted. Before him, the beginning of Yule, or the slaughter night, was the night of mid-winter, and Yule was kept for three days thereafter."
1599:
1545:
502:
1289:! Thanks for dropping me a message. Thanks too for your compliments - it's really appreciated. So in regards to the revert- I completely get the frustration. The core of the problem is that we need reliable sources to accurately back everything up so that we can make this as good quality as possible. With the
793:; just wanted to leave a comment that some of the sources (Foster 1977a, Speake 1980, Stiegemann, Kroker & Walter 2013b, and Hatto 1957) are not associated with a source. This may just be the result of entering years/letters incorrectly in some of the cases but wanted to let you know. Very nice work!
1885:
My point about
Britain and suppression is not that I'd ever seen anything saying there was suppression but that my reference and claim that this is the first time in England that suppression happened is not trying to claim anything about other bits of Britain or the region that became England before
1866:
Well, you've been a stickler for using Iberia etc. so I was surprised to see 'England' before there was one. What evidence is there that paganism was suppressed in Roman
Britain? Britain was abandoned about 400 and in that same period, paganism was still alive and well in the empire. The only things
1704:
Second, this is a broad overview article and details - even when they can be seen as evidence for what's being said - are not broad. Determining what details are important enough to include requires some larger impact on some major issue during the overall 2000 year history. The detail on
Britain is
875:
Right on, thanks for the response. I'll go ahead and reset it to before they started messing it up. Their reaction should be interesting given that they have been throwing tantrums at even slight interferences with their ″work″, but I'm willing to deal with that in order to get the article back into
1784:
I went and condensed and removed, and the *##!! thing is still over 12,000 words. (I kept some of your stuff on
Britain, since it was so good.) However, I still don't think I can nominate at that length. I am extremely frustrated. I also sympathize with and understand your frustration. Defining key
1712:
I am trying to finish up adding
Eastern Christianity, which was specifically requested in the peer review, and every time I add something, I look for something to delete. Out of respect for your work, I am asking you to cut most of what you added in order to do the same. It's not that it isn't good
1332:
It's going to be tricky getting a citation that works. I will go dig out my copy of the book to find some relevant passages. I suspect it is going to be difficult. I did have a look online, but there are no readable PDF's from what I would consider a reputable source (not stealing from authors...).
1258:
Hi
Ingwina. You've recently reversed my 'Modern Culture' reference in the Weyland the Smith entry on two occasions, the first due to no citation, the second questioning the veracity of the citation. Looking at your editing history I can see that you appear to be a source of expertise in these areas
1881:
But my point that I tried to explain above (likely poorly) is that in the 7th century there was an
England it just wasn't a single kingdom. I don't think it's anachronistic to talk about it in this way. You could specify "Anglo-Saxon England" but that is more words and is just more specific rather
1306:
As for the other unreferenced sections, they do frustrate me and I was likely the one who put the markers down. In the case when a mention slips past me or has dwelt there since before I was here, I tend to put markers and then may also delete them depending on number, relevance and time since the
1302:
and then it could be used to back up a claim along these lines. I feel your frustration and know how difficult it can be to find sources on modern influence like this and I did take a look earlier to see what I could find through academic journals without any luck. I am a massive supporter of the
840:
Hello
Ingwina, I saw that you also came across this article. I don't even know where to begin on it, seems to be the result of one or more anonymous editors inserting their own original research without pushback since the beginning of this year. On top of that judging by their edit summaries they
1708:
Third, my goal is to take this article to FA. It's already long enough that it is unlikely to succeed based purely on that length, so adding more at this point torpedoes those goals. This is a "premiere" article that should be FA imo, and anything that makes that more difficult is problematic.
860:
which was also pretty dodgy and still has some issues. The editor is clearly a bit odd and is being openly rude. I think reverting all their edits would make sense. There is so little reliable sourcing like you said and I don't have any trust in their work given their clear motivations to not be
1769:
That's okay! Don't worry - I know how this goes. My biggest problem with it was it being misleading. Selective briefness that misses the key points and suggests that it's telling the whole story is the issue. Just briefly mentioning it and saying where to go to find more is all that matters! If
1750:
It isn't, I'm sorry. I don't mean to be unappreciative of your work. It's good work with good intent, I can see that. In the Origins section, it lists pretty thoroughly all the various locations, but if you note, they are not all followed up on thereafter. One of the first things the first peer
1336:
For someone who doesn't get around to making contributions often, It's fascinating looking at the history of pages. I've been taking a look and can see I similar problem with what was then termed the 'Popular Culture' section. I had restored the section - that had been lost from this page for 2
1847:
Are you worried about anachronism? So England as a kingdom became an entity roughly between 927 and 1016 but as a geographical region, it is common for scholars to use England to refer to the region of Britain settled by Germanic folks from the 5th century and their later kingdoms (see
1238:. This gives the guidelines. Really what you're aiming for is work from reputable scholars - ideally the work should be in a peer reviewed journal :) If you want my opinion on if something looks good you can always give me a shout! Google scholar is often a good place to start!
1751:
review did was cut all specific mentions of countries - then in the second review, others asked why they weren't mentioned. Par for the course for peer review, but now it's on those of us working on it to decide what to do. I am thinking I am going to have to -
1696:
Hello! I really appreciate your additions to the article, but I would like to ask that you go back and remove the detail you added. First, there is now a bunch of detail on Britain, and if it's in one place, it should be in all, and it isn't. That gives Britain
1341:
I appreciate the attempts to keep pages clean, but looking down that older list, I can see what we are losing in terms of collective knowledge; which saddens me. I'm sure those with a passion for Knowledge editing have discussed this sort of thing many times.
1886:
it before the Anglo-Saxon settlement. It also seems plausible to me that there was suppression recorded that I'm not aware of in Western or Northern Britain or Ireland before the 7th century but I don't know enough about these regions to know if there was.
1068:"Hann setti Ăľat Ă lögum at hefja jĂłlahald Ăľann tĂma sem kristnir menn, ok skyldi þá hverr maĂ°r eiga mælis öl, en gjalda fĂ© ella, en halda heilagt meĂ°an jĂłlin ynnist. En áðr var jĂłlahald hafit hökunĂłtt, Ăľat var miĂ°svetrar nĂłtt, ok haldin Ăľriggja nátta jĂłl."
1329:. Thank you for getting back to me and providing a detailed explanation around all the inconsistences. I can understand your frustration in regard to the other unreferenced sections. I'm presuming you cannot 'revert' them after a certain period of time?
1002:
I recall that at some point in the recent past you were looking for discussion of the use of the term "giant" in place of jötun. I've encountered this come up several times. Most recently, discussion about this topic occurs in John Lindow's
1732:
and thanks for getting in touch. I understand your point and think we can find a good middle ground for a lot of this. From where I stand, we need to not be misleading with it and link the main article on the topic that I've just sorted
1126:, it is always the same day :) I've been meaning to tidy up these pages but haven't had the time. If you want to - I'm here to help with sources and so on and checking over your work - if not I understand and I will get there in the end!
1146:
Would you be able to write a section discussing the date in the article? It seems that people are still re-adding solstice as the date without noticing article edit history; a section devoted to dating in the article itself might be
746:
Then the consensus is wrong. If you look at the talk page, the debate has ended and no one has brought up a good reason as to why it should stay in that section. The “reasons” given have been nothing but thinly veiled partisanship.
1293:
source, we had a two-fold problem of the source not mentioning all the content in the text and also that the Goodreads reviews can be written by anyone without any checking - in concept one could write a review about how good
1065::) Not a problem at all - it's a confusing topic and there is lots of questionable information out there! It's good to get discussions going so we can sort it out collectively. So this is the bit I think you're referencing:
1882:
than necessary. England is commonly used to refer to the areas in which Old English was spoken in Britain before the unification in the 10th century and onwards. England does not in this case mean the kingdom of England.
1755:- cut all the countries into a simple list of one paragraph - maybe describe one thing in the way origins/geographic spread does. I will probably end up doing that for the sake of brevity. I'm sorry. It's just too much.
641:
Hi Vesperius :) If you're referring to the satelite map, it does include the Channel Islands by my reckoning. As for the other two, they are unfortunately omitted from the image I derived the Northern Europe image from
1496:
962:
1333:
If I do find a quote from a physical book, I'm presuming that copying it into the page would not be acceptable. I may love the books, but that creates way too long a reference for such a minor section!
1480:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
946:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1022:
That's brilliant - thank you. It's on my list of bits I really want to get done and I'm hoping to sort it out in the next few weeks. Anything you find would be very useful and I'll be looking too.
1799:
Okay perfect - that sounds like a plan. Thank you for your understanding and dedication to making great articles. I wish you all the best with the nomination and that all your hard work pays off!
674:
No fret! I just checked and the software I used for it annoyingly misses off the Channel Islands and the others. It also doesn't go too far north and only leaves a tiny bit of Svalbard.--
1564:
1465:
931:
626:
You should zoom that out to include the Channel Islands, Jan Mayen and Svalbard, that way it covers the general maximum definition of Northern Europe according to the United Nations.
1713:
and interesting. It's just too much for this particular article. Please support my effort to get this article up to FA standards, and go back and cut all of the detail you can cut.
876:
somewhat decent shape. I've got it on my watchlist so if you've already got quite a full one I think I can deal with it, but of course your help is welcome. Thanks either way!
37:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
1618:
1166:
Sorry - that's probably my fault for not tagging properly or something like that! Okay yep no problem I'll put in on my list. I may be able to get it out this weekend :)
57:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Knowledge, you might want to consider being "
716:
I'm not sure the color for the Celtic languages and Sami languages in the index of the Northern Europe First Language Map 2 is correct. Can you fix it if it's not?
176:
417:
1337:
years; only to have it entirely removed again immediately. The Hammer of the Sun reference was in there too, I suspect I put it in the original list :)
1736:
There wasn't even a section for Britain after 600. I've chopped a load out and I think it covers everything briefly now. Hopefully it's okay now :)
1122:
We also need to keep in mind that it may sound like the date of Yule is variable but it only moves in calendars like the Gregorian calendar. In the
861:
objective. Good spot on this one though - thanks for dealing with it. I'll put irt on my watchlist to keep an eye on it - I'm sure they'll be back.
224:
66:
1183:
I've uploaded it now. The scope of the page is blurry and it'd benefit from input from sensible people so do take a look and see what you think!
1046:
didn't take place during the solstice and the Saga attributed Hákon with moving Yule from Midwinter to solstice/Christmas; is that correct?
1519:
985:
236:
113:
1609:
1591:
1555:
1537:
515:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
1215:
it seems sincere. So I am curious what to look out for in the future so I'm not fooled again by an unreliable source. Thank you!
53:
1515:
981:
544:
523:
489:
421:
220:
194:
1357:
1274:
279:
202:
171:
804:
331:
34:
1489:
955:
540:
519:
398:
358:
335:
215:
126:
1501:
967:
318:
1086:
1785:
points is definitely an issue. If you find anything that seems misleading, please do tell me! We do not want that!
1235:
308:
253:
249:
207:
136:
275:
232:
752:
461:
443:
439:
258:
211:
856:
Hi TylerBurden - I also winced slightly when I saw it but really don't know much about it. I found it through
1690:
1123:
609:
539:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
353:
198:
117:
1220:
834:
469:
344:
313:
270:
240:
122:
58:
748:
1477:
1353:
1270:
943:
881:
846:
407:
403:
394:
390:
380:
62:
1872:
1838:
1790:
1760:
1718:
1577:
1427:
1345:
1262:
790:
452:
283:
245:
48:
717:
689:
661:
627:
1849:
1660:
1633:
1368:
1349:
1299:
1286:
1266:
1012:
721:
693:
665:
631:
340:
326:
266:
166:
1674:! I'd definitely be interested. I have a long list of planned works but if I can I'll help out :)
1180:
1153:
1062:
1047:
1648:
1613:
1559:
1075:
605:
322:
155:
78:
1211:. I was looking into the source and it does seem amateur but looking into the citations and the
1143:
Thank you for response and apologies for not responding myself (I didn't get the notification).
1459:
1405:
1231:
1216:
1157:
1051:
925:
857:
799:
646:) so I can't zoom out, unfortunately. If you find a better once, feel free to replace mine. --
413:
385:
108:
70:
1508:
1473:
974:
939:
877:
842:
69:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
1488:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
954:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1868:
1834:
1786:
1756:
1729:
1714:
1698:
1569:
1421:
818:
Thanks for the nice feedback and thanks for the catch there. It should all be sorted now.
465:
456:
44:
643:
587:
1671:
1656:
1652:
1623:
1485:
1008:
951:
447:
262:
1418:
You show a lot of effort and sincerity in northern topics oft-neglected. Allt ágætt~!
1209:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Numbers_in_Norse_mythology&oldid=1152772189
1207:
Hello, recently you removed a fair bit of one of my edits due to an unreliable source
65:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
1833:
Thank you! Your last edit added England - which began when? Should that be included?
1481:
1104:
about a month after the winter solstice. In actual fact this does not present a major
947:
349:
161:
74:
1887:
1853:
1800:
1771:
1737:
1675:
1378:
1326:
1308:
1239:
1184:
1167:
1130:
1116:
the winter solstice. Its full moon could thereby occur on 5 January at the earliest
1023:
891:
862:
819:
794:
767:
703:
675:
647:
567:
132:
1450:
1042:
Hi, I apologize for confused edits. Regarding the recent revert: as I understand,
916:
601:
508:
493:
1087:
https://www.academia.edu/1366945/Jul_disting_och_f%C3%B6rkyrklig_tider%C3%A4kning
702:
Yep it is a pain! Again feel free to update it if you find something better :) --
552:
1587:
1533:
1339:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wayland_the_Smith&oldid=281046515
1290:
1113:
lunar month’s full moon. This moon month started at the first new moon after
1110:
Midwinter Night. Yule was probably celebrated at the time of the second Yule
1098:
Snorri, who says that the feast was celebrated on Midwinter Night. This has,
1043:
518:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
1095:"The exact information about the time of the pre-Christian Yule is given by
660:
Whoops, I meant the original First Language Map. Sorry for not clarifying.
1598:
1544:
1492:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1107:
problem, because Yule seems to be linked to both the winter solstice and
958:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
522:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
1469:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1295:
1101:
however, been much debated, because Midwinter Night did not occur until
935:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
564:
1770:
you're being consistent between regions, how could I ask for more? :)
1119:
and on 2 February at the latest—expressed in the Gregorian calendar."
763:
1895:
1876:
1861:
1842:
1808:
1794:
1779:
1764:
1745:
1722:
1683:
1664:
1637:
1580:
1565:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 16 § Cult house
1523:
1435:
1386:
1361:
1316:
1278:
1247:
1224:
1192:
1175:
1161:
1138:
1055:
1031:
1016:
989:
899:
885:
870:
850:
827:
809:
775:
756:
725:
711:
697:
683:
669:
655:
644:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Europe_satellite_orthographic.jpg
635:
613:
573:
501:
82:
1616:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
1562:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
1074:
A key difficulty here is what we mean by "the night of midwinter" (
551:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
1212:
511:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
1619:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 19 § Fax (hair)
1505:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1234:! Thanks for getting in touch. The first place I'd check out is
971:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1495:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1463:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
961:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
929:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
890:
Brilliant. It looks much better now. Thanks for the good work!
1372:
500:
529:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
1604:
1550:
1476:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1338:
1208:
942:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
553:
532:
1651:, would you be interested in joining a wikiproject on
1377:
If you need any help with it again just give a shout!
1612:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
1558:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
1092:
Here we see in the English summary at page 155-156.
762:Hi FactCheckTruth. Please see my response on the
73:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
47:and ask your question there. Please remember to
1867:being suppressed were sacrifice and divination.
782:Missing Bibliographies on Germanic boar helmet
622:About the first Northern Europe map you made.
8:
1254:Recently reverted edit for Weyland the Smith
61:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
1343:
1260:
1373:https://en.wikipedia.org/Template:Sfn
7:
1460:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
926:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
1444:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
910:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
14:
1655:(which folklore is a subset of)?
560:Thanks again, and happy editing!
1597:
1543:
1449:
1404:
915:
766:page. Hopefully this will help.
600:Congratulations on your work at
586:
52:
1622:until a consensus is reached.
1568:until a consensus is reached.
1499:and submit your choices on the
965:and submit your choices on the
177:Request administrator attention
1:
1647:Hi, I see you're a member of
1581:07:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
1524:00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1478:Knowledge arbitration process
1436:04:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
990:01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
944:Knowledge arbitration process
614:09:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
574:21:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
543:without posting a request to
225:Biographies of living persons
123:The five pillars of Knowledge
90:
83:03:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
1032:07:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
1017:21:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
1896:06:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
1877:02:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
1862:09:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
1843:22:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
1809:20:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
1795:20:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
1780:20:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
1765:20:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
1746:20:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
1723:16:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
900:18:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
886:17:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
871:07:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
851:02:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
726:08:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
1928:
1516:MediaWiki message delivery
1236:Knowledge:Reliable sources
1193:15:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
1176:09:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
1162:20:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
1139:21:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
1056:11:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
982:MediaWiki message delivery
162:Frequently Asked Questions
51:on talk pages by clicking
1684:19:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1665:18:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1638:22:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
1412:The Barnstar of Diligence
1403:
1387:07:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
1362:06:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
1317:20:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
1279:08:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
828:18:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
810:07:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
742:Othala page reverted edit
712:06:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
698:20:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
684:12:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
670:11:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
656:07:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
636:20:38, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
585:
114:Contributing to Knowledge
1891:
1857:
1804:
1775:
1741:
1679:
1610:redirects for discussion
1592:Redirects for discussion
1556:redirects for discussion
1538:Redirects for discussion
1513:to your user talk page.
1382:
1312:
1243:
1188:
1171:
1134:
1085:A good discussion is in
1027:
979:to your user talk page.
895:
866:
823:
776:19:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
771:
757:12:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
707:
679:
651:
604:, an excellent article.
554:leaving us some feedback
541:create articles yourself
520:create articles yourself
156:Get help at the Teahouse
1691:History of Christianity
1248:19:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
1225:16:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
1124:Early Germanic calendar
1079:
362:(Knowledge's newspaper)
186:Policies and Guidelines
1203:Recently reverted edit
835:Galtung (noble family)
505:
167:Where to ask questions
1474:Arbitration Committee
1457:Hello! Voting in the
940:Arbitration Committee
923:Hello! Voting in the
594:The Original Barnstar
545:Articles for creation
524:Articles for creation
504:
490:Articles for creation
221:What Knowledge is not
195:Neutral point of view
31:Welcome to Knowledge!
791:Germanic boar helmet
408:Translating articles
314:Adopt-a-user program
280:Conflict of interest
203:No original research
172:Department directory
1850:Anglo-Saxon England
1614:redirect guidelines
1608:has been listed at
1560:redirect guidelines
1554:has been listed at
1397:A barnstar for you!
1300:Pride and Prejudice
1129:I hope this helps!
1005:Old Norse Mythology
579:A barnstar for you!
488:Your submission at
332:No personal attacks
1490:arbitration policy
956:arbitration policy
506:
404:Join a WikiProject
399:Requested articles
386:Be bold in editing
336:Resolving disputes
216:Content guidelines
127:Simplified ruleset
118:Your first article
35:your contributions
1526:
1441:
1440:
1433:
1364:
1348:comment added by
1281:
1265:comment added by
1080:"miĂ°svetrar nĂłtt"
998:Jötun vs. "giant"
992:
858:Boars in heraldry
619:
618:
496:has been accepted
485:
484:
481:
480:
477:
476:
319:Assume good faith
291:
290:
241:Three-revert rule
89:
88:
1919:
1630:
1607:
1601:
1575:
1572:
1553:
1547:
1514:
1512:
1453:
1434:
1420:
1408:
1401:
1400:
1298:is described in
1213:About Me section
980:
978:
919:
807:
802:
797:
789:Nice article at
590:
583:
582:
572:
570:
556:
548:
535:
462:Useful templates
309:Community Portal
295:
294:
254:Image use policy
250:Non-free content
208:Reliable sources
95:
94:
91:
56:
41:
29:Hello, Ingwina!
25:
24:
21:
20:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1694:
1645:
1624:
1603:
1595:
1573:
1570:
1549:
1541:
1529:
1528:
1506:
1454:
1446:
1432:
1419:
1399:
1256:
1205:
1040:
1000:
995:
994:
972:
920:
912:
838:
805:
800:
795:
784:
744:
624:
581:
576:
568:
562:
538:
531:
527:
498:
432:
372:
341:Build consensus
300:
276:Deletion policy
233:Manual of Style
187:
147:
137:upload an image
100:
99:Getting Started
85:
39:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1925:
1923:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1883:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1734:
1693:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1653:oral tradition
1644:
1641:
1594:
1584:
1540:
1530:
1497:the candidates
1466:eligible users
1455:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1426:
1415:
1414:
1409:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1375:
1334:
1330:
1320:
1319:
1304:
1255:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1178:
1151:
1148:
1144:
1127:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1090:
1083:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
999:
996:
963:the candidates
932:eligible users
921:
914:
913:
911:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
837:
832:
831:
830:
816:
783:
780:
779:
778:
749:FactCheckTruth
743:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
623:
620:
617:
616:
597:
596:
591:
580:
577:
526:if you prefer.
517:
513:
499:
497:
486:
483:
482:
479:
478:
475:
474:
473:
472:
459:
450:
444:Disambiguation
434:
433:
430:
427:
426:
425:
424:
410:
401:
388:
374:
373:
370:
367:
366:
365:
364:
356:
347:
338:
329:
316:
302:
301:
298:
292:
289:
288:
287:
286:
273:
259:External links
256:
243:
229:
228:
227:
218:
212:Citing sources
205:
189:
188:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
174:
169:
164:
159:
149:
148:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
129:
120:
102:
101:
98:
87:
86:
49:sign your name
33:Thank you for
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1924:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1884:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1700:
1692:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1642:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1629:
1628:
1621:
1620:
1615:
1611:
1606:
1602:The redirect
1600:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1576:
1567:
1566:
1561:
1557:
1552:
1548:The redirect
1546:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1510:
1504:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1470:
1468:
1467:
1462:
1461:
1452:
1443:
1437:
1431:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1410:
1407:
1402:
1396:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1202:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1121:
1118:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1038:Hákon and Jól
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
997:
993:
991:
987:
983:
976:
970:
969:
964:
959:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
936:
934:
933:
928:
927:
918:
909:
901:
897:
893:
889:
888:
887:
883:
879:
874:
873:
872:
868:
864:
859:
855:
854:
853:
852:
848:
844:
836:
833:
829:
825:
821:
817:
814:
813:
812:
811:
808:
803:
798:
792:
787:
786:Hey Ingwina,
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
760:
759:
758:
754:
750:
741:
727:
723:
719:
715:
714:
713:
709:
705:
701:
700:
699:
695:
691:
688:Aw, oh well.
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
645:
640:
639:
638:
637:
633:
629:
621:
615:
611:
607:
606:Chiswick Chap
603:
599:
598:
595:
592:
589:
584:
578:
575:
571:
566:
561:
558:
555:
549:
546:
542:
536:
534:
525:
521:
516:
512:
510:
503:
495:
491:
487:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
454:
451:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
436:
435:
431:Miscellaneous
429:
428:
423:
419:
415:
412:Cleaning up:
411:
409:
405:
402:
400:
396:
392:
389:
387:
383:
382:
378:
377:
376:
375:
369:
368:
363:
361:
357:
355:
354:Mailing lists
351:
348:
346:
342:
339:
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
317:
315:
311:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
299:The Community
297:
296:
293:
285:
281:
277:
274:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
226:
222:
219:
217:
213:
209:
206:
204:
200:
199:Verifiability
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
184:
183:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
144:
143:
138:
134:
130:
128:
124:
121:
119:
115:
111:
110:
106:
105:
104:
103:
97:
96:
93:
92:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
55:
50:
46:
42:
36:
32:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
1752:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1695:
1646:
1626:
1625:
1617:
1596:
1590:" listed at
1563:
1542:
1536:" listed at
1500:
1494:
1471:
1464:
1458:
1456:
1428:
1423:~Sıgehelmus♗
1422:
1411:
1344:— Preceding
1261:— Preceding
1257:
1232:Chacabangaso
1217:Chacabangaso
1206:
1041:
1004:
1001:
966:
960:
937:
930:
924:
922:
839:
788:
785:
745:
625:
593:
559:
550:
530:
528:
514:
507:
470:User scripts
418:Copy editing
379:
371:Things to do
360:The Signpost
359:
350:IRC channels
345:Village pump
307:
271:Sockpuppetry
154:
146:Getting Help
109:Introduction
107:
71:edit summary
38:
30:
1705:not that.
1649:WP:Folklore
1643:Wikiproject
1502:voting page
1009::bloodofox:
968:voting page
878:TylerBurden
843:TylerBurden
815:Hi Iazyges,
801:Consermonor
395:Peer review
391:Maintenance
381:Task Center
133:edit a page
63:WikiProject
1869:Jenhawk777
1835:Jenhawk777
1787:Jenhawk777
1757:Jenhawk777
1730:Jenhawk777
1715:Jenhawk777
1605:Fax (hair)
1588:Fax (hair)
1571:Clovermoss
1551:Cult house
1534:Cult house
1486:topic bans
1147:helpful :)
952:topic bans
457:Talk pages
453:User pages
440:Categories
284:Notability
246:Copyrights
237:Simplified
40:{{helpme}}
1701:weight.
1672:Kowal2701
1657:Kowal2701
1627:Steel1943
1482:site bans
1291:Goodreads
1076:Old Norse
1044:Midwinter
948:site bans
806:Opus meum
718:Vesperius
690:Vesperius
662:Vesperius
628:Vesperius
602:Elk-FroĂ°i
533:help desk
509:Elk-FroĂ°i
494:Elk-FroĂ°i
422:Vandalism
327:Etiquette
267:Vandalism
45:talk page
1699:WP:Undue
1369:Quagswag
1358:contribs
1350:Quagswag
1346:unsigned
1287:Quagswag
1275:contribs
1267:Quagswag
1263:unsigned
323:Civility
131:How to:
75:Peaceray
43:on your
17:Welcome!
1888:Ingwina
1854:Ingwina
1801:Ingwina
1772:Ingwina
1753:have to
1738:Ingwina
1676:Ingwina
1509:NoACEMM
1379:Ingwina
1327:Ingwina
1309:Ingwina
1296:Gandalf
1240:Ingwina
1185:Ingwina
1181:SMiki55
1168:Ingwina
1154:SMiki55
1150:Cheers!
1131:Ingwina
1063:SMiki55
1048:SMiki55
1024:Ingwina
975:NoACEMM
892:Ingwina
863:Ingwina
820:Ingwina
796:Iazyges
768:Ingwina
704:Ingwina
676:Ingwina
648:Ingwina
414:General
59:adopted
1578:(talk)
764:Othala
1429:(Tøk)
466:Tools
448:Stubs
1892:talk
1873:talk
1858:talk
1839:talk
1805:talk
1791:talk
1776:talk
1761:talk
1742:talk
1733:out.
1728:Hi @
1719:talk
1680:talk
1670:Hi @
1661:talk
1634:talk
1520:talk
1472:The
1383:talk
1367:Hi @
1354:talk
1325:Hi @
1313:talk
1285:Hi @
1271:talk
1244:talk
1221:talk
1189:talk
1172:talk
1158:talk
1135:talk
1052:talk
1028:talk
1013:talk
986:talk
938:The
896:talk
882:talk
867:talk
847:talk
824:talk
772:talk
753:talk
722:talk
708:talk
694:talk
680:talk
666:talk
652:talk
632:talk
610:talk
263:Spam
239:) •
79:talk
67:here
1230:Hi
1061:Hi
1894:)
1875:)
1860:)
1841:)
1807:)
1793:)
1778:)
1763:)
1744:)
1721:)
1682:)
1663:)
1636:)
1574:🍀
1522:)
1511:}}
1507:{{
1484:,
1385:)
1360:)
1356:•
1315:)
1277:)
1273:•
1246:)
1223:)
1191:)
1174:)
1160:)
1137:)
1078::
1054:)
1030:)
1015:)
988:)
977:}}
973:{{
950:,
898:)
884:)
869:)
849:)
826:)
774:)
755:)
724:)
710:)
696:)
682:)
668:)
654:)
634:)
612:)
565:SJ
563:–
557:.
492::
468:•
464:•
455:•
446:•
442:•
420:•
416:•
406:•
397:•
393:•
384:•
352:•
343:•
334:•
325:•
321:•
312:•
282:•
278:•
269:•
265:•
261:•
252:•
248:•
223:•
214:•
210:•
201:•
197:•
135:•
125:•
116:•
112:•
81:)
1890:(
1871:(
1856:(
1837:(
1803:(
1789:(
1774:(
1759:(
1740:(
1717:(
1678:(
1659:(
1632:(
1586:"
1532:"
1518:(
1381:(
1352:(
1311:(
1269:(
1242:(
1219:(
1187:(
1170:(
1156:(
1133:(
1089:.
1050:(
1026:(
1011:(
984:(
894:(
880:(
865:(
845:(
822:(
770:(
751:(
720:(
706:(
692:(
678:(
664:(
650:(
642:(
630:(
608:(
569:+
547:.
537:.
235:(
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
