380:
something by mistake while I was editing the talk page with my reply to your remark? As far as I can tell, your remark to which I replied is still there. Believe me that if this was some kind of mistake on my part, I never meant to insult anyone. It seems likely to me that perhaps there has been some technical problem, perhaps with a bot -- I'm not sure. Again, **I have no memory** of removing any remarks and I would never do that in the first place :) I looked at the talk page history and couldn't find any evidence of anything being removed. Perhaps you can tell me what exactly was removed?
145:. Furthermore, I have no opinion on the matter and therefore will not be accused of advancing it. I simply determined it to be more appropriate to show that nobody is actually sure whether Egypt, India, and China truly did develop their own writing systems by use of the word "perhaps" than to retain a dubious template and a (potentially) outright fallacious claim: that Mesoamerica is "among the five known places in the world where writing has developed independently", when, in fact, there may have been only two, as Knowledge itself relates elsewhere.
404:
editor on the entire talk page and kept it open for 12 hours or so, then used it to add your Thanks remark. That would wipe out any changes made to the rest of the page by other editors during that period. (I initially thought that the editor would give you an "edit conflict" warning in this case, but after some research and experimentation, it seems that the editor is not really that smart. It only seems to report edit conflicts if they occur within a line.)
221:
169:
897:
809:
277:
1288:
1177:
992:
238:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
186:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
403:
Hi, if you look at a list of your contributions, there is a button to the left of each edit, which you can click to see the exact change you made with that edit. It's clear from that button that you removed my remark as part of your "Thanks..." edit. The most plausible scenario is that you opened an
379:
I think there has been some misunderstanding. I have no memory of removing any remarks in the talk page, and I would **never** do that because it's very rude. The only thing I did yesterday was reply to your remark with a thank you :) Perhaps there's been some technical glitch or perhaps I removed
712:
derived from the text that was there before the plotting algorithms page was broken out and the text was moved to that page. Right now, the plotting algorithms section of the main
Mandelbrot set article only contains a brief summary and a link to the main article, which is the plotting algorithms
468:
Well, looking more closely, I can see that when I replied with a thank you to your remark on the bottom of the talk page, the
Mandelbrot set history page has a "-18" associated with my edit, and, it does appear that your remark was removed, but not by me, at least not intentionally. Feel free to
140:
I removed the dubious template because the way in which I rewrote the sentence made it no longer dubious. I used the "weasel word" "perhaps" owing to the uncertainty among modern academia as to the authenticity to the claim that India, China, and Egypt independently developed writing systems, as
539:, it looks like I removed the remark, even though I didn't -- strange. I might have left the edit window open accidentally as you said -- I tend to have dozens of tabs open in my browser and I might have accidentally left the source editor open. Sorry for any inconvenience. Regards,
438:
Hello :) I replied to your question on my talk page about why a remark in the
Mandelbrot set article's talk page was removed. I assure you that I have no memory of removing any remarks, and I wouldn't do that in the first place as it would be rude :) See my talk page reply here :
148:
I suppose a better fix would be to remove the dubious template, which is intended to be placed after sourced claims that nonetheless remain dubious, and replace it with a citation needed template at the end of the sentence, which in fact I shall now do.
418:
PS, I've removed the comments you added to my talk page, on the principle that discussions should be continued on the page where they were initiated. Please add the comments back here in chronological sequence if you think they're needed.
940:
852:
320:
364:. You removed my remark about 10 hours later, without explanation, in an edit with the summary (Thanks...). Okay, you may have it, it's not worth arguing about. I'm just a little curious about your reason.
924:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
836:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
304:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
910:
822:
584:
Thanks for the tip, but you should have told me first on my talk page and I would have made the edits myself. I've since reverted your edits and then re-applied them with my account.
290:
1128:
178:
93:
Hello :) This is my talk page. If you wish to discuss an edit and/or revert that I've performed, then please post here first. If you're polite, it makes it a lot easier on me :)
1126:! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
1365:
of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in
Knowledge, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
1339:
1043:
1375:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
1214:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
1048:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
1116:
1397:
1236:
1070:
694:
690:
608:
73:
137:"The dubious template is valid and should not be removed. Please do not insert unsourced weasel words and perform edits to advanced you own opinion."
230:
1390:
1229:
1063:
250:
198:
494:
One can see from the
Mandelbrot set talk page history that your remark was indeed removed, but why, how and by whom, I don't know. See here :
102:( Please do not edit my own replies and/or comments or this section unless you've contacted me and have a really good reason -- Thank you :) )
498:-- ":Note added in retrospect. Nobody responded to this proposal at the time, however the split was eventually performed, a few weeks later.
79:
1357:, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Knowledge's
963:
874:
342:
38:
733:
Cut-out unwieldy "Computer drawings" section of main
Mandelbrot set article, and modified it with cleanup and merging certain sections.
537:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Mandelbrot_set&type=revision&diff=940463147&oldid=940389460&diffmode=source
496:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Mandelbrot_set&type=revision&diff=940463147&oldid=940389460&diffmode=source
686:
754:
713:
article. I'm not sure how to go about changing the initial edit summary on the plotting algorithms page, if that's what you mean.
96:
Please also feel free to post any general suggestions and/or ideas that pertain to any page I've edited, but be polite please :)
1350:
1294:
1275:
1183:
1164:
998:
979:
959:
870:
338:
1322:
1201:
1026:
24:
777:
page on WP, so its kind of a loop, I'll need to have a look in the morning, fresh eyes. Forget it, I think loop. Wrong gig.
1417:
1329:
1256:
1090:
1033:
68:
1142:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
933:
845:
646:
313:
945:
857:
574:
325:
234:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
182:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
59:
1186:
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by
MicrobiologyMarcus was:
164:
Orphaned non-free image File:CCC compressed image of Lena ( standard test image ) w- colors quantized to 15 bits.png
1354:
1315:
1019:
239:
187:
1205:
773:
I did an earwig test on it, and came up with a heavy report, but checked the source page, top url, cc'd from
1358:
1262:
1197:
739:
570:
559:
1342:
when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for
Knowledge.
1297:
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:
1046:
when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for
Knowledge.
1370:
921:
833:
750:
680:
301:
1001:
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:
1362:
1308:
1300:
1012:
1004:
768:
361:
49:
1138:
503:
424:
409:
369:
142:
64:
904:
816:
284:
154:
45:
952:
917:
864:
829:
780:
746:
676:
670:
655:
614:
566:
469:
revert the edit and/or put your remark back. I'm not sure exactly what happened :/ Regards,
332:
297:
179:
File:CCC compressed image of Lena ( standard test image ) w- colors quantized to 15 bits.png
932:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
844:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
312:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1427:
1149:
1102:
258:
206:
1389:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
1228:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
1062:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
745:
banner to the Talk pages of both articles, which will hopefully make the history clear.
1346:
1338:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
1042:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
929:
841:
774:
705:
626:
309:
735:
I am not sure what beyond that has to be said. To be on the safe side, I've added the
925:
837:
618:
499:
420:
405:
365:
305:
216:
Orphaned non-free image File:CCC compressed image of Lena ( standard test image ).png
1189:
235:
183:
150:
1349:
than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
1115:
896:
808:
276:
760:
714:
585:
540:
518:
507:
481:
470:
455:
444:
386:
108:
20:
1287:
1176:
991:
1423:
1383:
1279:
1222:
1168:
1144:
1097:
1056:
983:
254:
202:
936:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
848:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
316:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
914:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
826:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
294:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1136:
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
1431:
1303:. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
1268:
1153:
1106:
1007:. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
967:
878:
787:
722:
662:
593:
578:
548:
440:
428:
413:
394:
373:
346:
262:
210:
158:
116:
693:
page and I added all the initial content. Most of the text in the
949:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
861:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
329:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1382:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
1221:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
1055:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
939:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
851:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
319:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
908:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
820:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
15:
1400:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
1239:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
1073:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
231:
File:CCC compressed image of Lena ( standard test image ).png
1286:
1175:
990:
219:
167:
441:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jdbtwo#Removal_of_remark
629:. In edit summary, I would add the attribution per policy.
1418:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
1257:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
1091:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
569:, drafts should not be added to any article categories.
288:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1410:
1402:
1249:
1241:
1083:
1075:
920:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
832:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
728:
536:
495:
300:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1386:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
1299:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
1225:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
1059:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
1003:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
1396:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
1235:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
1069:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
360:
Hi, I added a brief remark yesterday to the section
638:
634:
633:To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with
249:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
197:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1200:. If you need help with referencing, please see
1196:sources are required so that information can be
1188:This submission is not adequately supported by
623:
600:I have sent you a note about a page you started
27:, where you can send him messages and comments.
1369:Also, Github is not a reliable source and see
535:Well, looking at the diff in question, here :
251:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
245:Note that any non-free images not used in any
199:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
193:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1312:(not just passing mentions about the subject)
1016:(not just passing mentions about the subject)
617:, while examining this page as a part of our
492:
466:
436:
8:
637:. And, don't forget to sign your reply with
891:
803:
695:Plotting algorithms for the Mandelbrot set
691:Plotting algorithms for the Mandelbrot set
609:Plotting algorithms for the Mandelbrot set
506:) 07:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)" Regards,
271:
362:Talk:Mandelbrot set#Splitting the Article
1355:independent, reliable, published sources
675:I'm not quite sure what you're asking.
1212:still some largely unsourced sections.
732:
133:Regarding Mesoamerican writing systems
123:Please post comments below this line
7:
905:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
817:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
285:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
1367:The comment the reviewer left was:
1210:The comment the reviewer left was:
888:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
800:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
433:I'll add back the comments here --
1293:Your recent article submission to
1182:Your recent article submission to
997:Your recent article submission to
268:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
14:
1353:, and should refer to a range of
1301:qualifies for a Knowledge article
1005:qualifies for a Knowledge article
649:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
567:Knowledge:Drafts#Preparing drafts
1114:
895:
807:
275:
141:reflected, e.g., in the article
39:Click here to start a new topic.
1404:Articles for creation help desk
1347:read more like an advertisement
1243:Articles for creation help desk
1129:Articles for creation help desk
1077:Articles for creation help desk
943:and submit your choices on the
855:and submit your choices on the
323:and submit your choices on the
621:, had the following comments:
117:16:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
1377:after they have been resolved
1216:after they have been resolved
1050:after they have been resolved
968:00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
922:Knowledge arbitration process
879:02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
834:Knowledge arbitration process
625:Most of the text is from the
549:19:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
523:17:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
486:17:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
460:17:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
429:11:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
414:11:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
395:17:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
374:01:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
347:00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
302:Knowledge arbitration process
263:17:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
240:our policy for non-free media
211:17:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
188:our policy for non-free media
36:Put new text under old text.
1345:This submission appears to
1154:18:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
1107:18:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
645:(Message delivered via the
44:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1447:
960:MediaWiki message delivery
871:MediaWiki message delivery
339:MediaWiki message delivery
1432:15:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
1269:12:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
1202:Referencing for beginners
220:
168:
159:19:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
74:Be welcoming to newcomers
957:to your user talk page.
869:to your user talk page.
788:22:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
769:21:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
764:
755:20:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
723:19:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
718:
663:10:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
594:19:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
589:
579:19:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
544:
390:
337:to your user talk page.
112:
607:Thank you for creating
1291:
1180:
995:
631:
560:Special:Diff/956149296
526:
489:
463:
225:
173:
69:avoid personal attacks
1351:neutral point of view
1295:Articles for Creation
1290:
1276:Articles for creation
1184:Articles for Creation
1179:
1165:Articles for creation
999:Articles for Creation
994:
980:Articles for creation
918:Arbitration Committee
902:Hello! Voting in the
830:Arbitration Committee
814:Hello! Voting in the
729:original edit summary
708:article. However, it
619:page curation process
298:Arbitration Committee
282:Hello! Voting in the
228:Thanks for uploading
223:
176:Thanks for uploading
171:
1412:reviewer's talk page
1359:verifiability policy
1251:reviewer's talk page
1085:reviewer's talk page
1274:Your submission at
1163:Your submission at
978:Your submission at
1292:
1181:
1132:. If you have any
996:
934:arbitration policy
846:arbitration policy
635:{{Re|Scope creep}}
314:arbitration policy
226:
174:
143:History of writing
80:dispute resolution
41:
1398:untoward behavior
1340:mistakes to avoid
1237:untoward behavior
1160:
1159:
1071:untoward behavior
1044:mistakes to avoid
975:
974:
970:
885:
884:
650:
571:1234qwer1234qwer4
524:
487:
461:
356:Removal of remark
353:
352:
236:claim of fair use
184:claim of fair use
90:
89:
60:Assume good faith
37:
1438:
1415:
1407:
1265:
1254:
1246:
1190:reliable sources
1152:
1147:
1118:
1111:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1088:
1080:
958:
956:
899:
892:
868:
811:
804:
785:
783:
744:
738:
674:
660:
658:
644:
640:
636:
615:User:Scope creep
522:
521:
485:
484:
459:
458:
336:
279:
272:
222:
170:
125:
124:
104:
103:
16:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1409:
1401:
1374:
1366:
1343:
1334:of the subject
1284:
1271:
1263:
1248:
1240:
1213:
1209:
1173:
1156:
1148:
1143:
1109:
1101:
1096:
1082:
1074:
1047:
1038:of the subject
988:
950:
890:
862:
802:
781:
779:
742:
736:
668:
656:
654:
602:
563:
516:
479:
453:
358:
330:
270:
253:. Thank you. --
218:
201:. Thank you. --
166:
135:
130:
122:
121:
101:
100:
86:
85:
55:
12:
11:
5:
1444:
1442:
1422:
1421:
1394:
1391:may be deleted
1387:
1371:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
1368:
1344:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1327:
1320:
1313:
1304:
1298:
1285:
1283:
1272:
1261:
1260:
1233:
1230:may be deleted
1226:
1211:
1206:Citing sources
1187:
1174:
1172:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1121:
1119:
1095:
1094:
1067:
1064:may be deleted
1060:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1031:
1024:
1017:
1008:
1002:
989:
987:
976:
973:
972:
941:the candidates
911:eligible users
900:
889:
886:
883:
882:
853:the candidates
823:eligible users
812:
801:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
775:Mandelbrot set
706:Mandelbrot set
689:) created the
627:Mandelbrot set
604:Hello, Jdbtwo
601:
598:
597:
596:
562:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
515:
478:
452:
416:
398:
397:
382:
381:
357:
354:
351:
350:
321:the candidates
291:eligible users
280:
269:
266:
217:
214:
165:
162:
134:
131:
129:
127:
107:
99:
92:
88:
87:
84:
83:
76:
71:
62:
56:
54:
53:
42:
33:
32:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1443:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1419:
1414:
1413:
1406:
1405:
1399:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1378:
1372:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1341:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1302:
1296:
1289:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1270:
1267:
1258:
1253:
1252:
1245:
1244:
1238:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1217:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1185:
1178:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1140:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1117:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1099:
1092:
1087:
1086:
1079:
1078:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1051:
1045:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1000:
993:
985:
981:
977:
971:
969:
965:
961:
954:
948:
947:
942:
937:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
913:
912:
907:
906:
901:
898:
894:
893:
887:
881:
880:
876:
872:
866:
860:
859:
854:
849:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
825:
824:
819:
818:
813:
810:
806:
805:
799:
789:
786:
784:
776:
772:
771:
770:
766:
762:
759:Thank you :)
758:
757:
756:
752:
748:
741:
740:split article
734:
730:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
711:
707:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
685:
682:
678:
672:
667:
666:
665:
664:
661:
659:
651:
648:
647:Page Curation
642:
630:
628:
622:
620:
616:
612:
610:
605:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
582:
581:
580:
576:
572:
568:
561:
558:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
525:
520:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
491:
490:
488:
483:
476:
472:
465:
464:
462:
457:
450:
446:
442:
435:
434:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
417:
415:
411:
407:
402:
401:
400:
399:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
355:
349:
348:
344:
340:
334:
328:
327:
322:
317:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
293:
292:
287:
286:
281:
278:
274:
273:
267:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
241:
237:
233:
232:
215:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
191:
189:
185:
181:
180:
163:
161:
160:
156:
152:
146:
144:
138:
132:
128:
126:
119:
118:
114:
110:
105:
97:
94:
81:
77:
75:
72:
70:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
51:
47:
46:Learn to edit
43:
40:
35:
34:
31:
30:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1411:
1403:
1376:
1330:
1323:
1316:
1307:
1264:microbiology
1250:
1242:
1215:
1193:
1137:
1133:
1127:
1123:
1084:
1076:
1049:
1034:
1027:
1020:
1011:
944:
938:
915:
909:
903:
856:
850:
827:
821:
815:
778:
709:
702:
698:
683:
653:
652:
643:
632:
624:
613:
606:
603:
564:
511:
493:
474:
467:
448:
437:
359:
324:
318:
295:
289:
283:
246:
244:
229:
227:
194:
192:
177:
175:
147:
139:
136:
120:
106:
98:
95:
91:
1331:independent
1150:Talk to me!
1103:Talk to me!
1035:independent
986:(January 8)
946:voting page
858:voting page
782:scope_creep
671:Scope creep
657:scope_creep
519:User:Jdbtwo
482:User:Jdbtwo
456:User:Jdbtwo
443:. Regards,
326:voting page
1384:Draft:WKdm
1363:notability
1223:Draft:WKdm
1057:Draft:WKdm
930:topic bans
842:topic bans
747:XOR'easter
677:XOR'easter
310:topic bans
1408:, on the
1324:secondary
1282:(June 25)
1247:, on the
1171:(March 2)
1081:, on the
1028:secondary
926:site bans
838:site bans
701:from the
385:Regards,
306:site bans
82:if needed
65:Be polite
25:talk page
1361:and the
1317:reliable
1309:in-depth
1198:verified
1194:Reliable
1139:Teahouse
1021:reliable
1013:in-depth
731:states,
697:article
687:contribs
500:Eleuther
421:Eleuther
406:Eleuther
366:Eleuther
247:articles
195:articles
50:get help
19:This is
1416:or use
1255:or use
1122:Hello,
1089:or use
953:NoACEMM
865:NoACEMM
703:current
333:NoACEMM
151:Dylanvt
1266:Marcus
1124:Jdbtwo
761:Jdbtwo
715:Jdbtwo
699:is not
586:Jdbtwo
541:Jdbtwo
508:Jdbtwo
471:Jdbtwo
445:Jdbtwo
387:Jdbtwo
109:Jdbtwo
21:Jdbtwo
1424:S0091
1145:Lewcm
1134:other
1098:Lewcm
255:B-bot
203:B-bot
78:Seek
1428:talk
1280:WKdm
1204:and
1169:WKdm
984:WKdm
964:talk
916:The
875:talk
828:The
765:talk
751:talk
727:The
719:talk
681:talk
639:~~~~
590:talk
575:talk
565:Per
545:talk
512:talk
504:talk
475:talk
449:talk
425:talk
410:talk
391:talk
370:talk
343:talk
296:The
259:talk
207:talk
155:talk
113:talk
67:and
242:).
190:).
23:'s
1430:)
1379:.
1278::
1218:.
1192:.
1167::
1052:.
982::
966:)
955:}}
951:{{
928:,
877:)
867:}}
863:{{
840:,
767:)
753:)
743:}}
737:{{
721:)
710:is
641:.
611:.
592:)
577:)
547:)
517:—
480:—
454:—
427:)
412:)
393:)
372:)
345:)
335:}}
331:{{
308:,
261:)
209:)
157:)
115:)
48:;
1426:(
1420:.
1393:.
1373:.
1259:.
1232:.
1208:.
1093:.
1066:.
962:(
873:(
763:(
749:(
717:(
684:·
679:(
673::
669:@
588:(
573:(
543:(
514:)
510:(
502:(
477:)
473:(
451:)
447:(
423:(
408:(
389:(
368:(
341:(
257:(
224:⚠
205:(
172:⚠
153:(
111:(
52:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.