User talk:Josh.Pritchard.DBA

1846:

his stupid little edit count, which he boasts so fondly of. You can debate the difference between the definitions of accuse and advise all you want, but there is little doubt of his malice. He deleted my research from the site based solely on my surname! That sir is not good judgment and I also question your judgment for defending such a hack. I did not threaten WLU. I guarantee if he ever removes research from edits based on some ones last name, I WILL report him. Editor’s qualifications are the MOST important inquiries we should be making on Knowledge (XXG). Who are you to say otherwise? I am not a part of WLU’s community and unlike you I don’t wish to build anything with someone so quick to judge and forego an apology when he is wrong. His qualifications on the bench press are nil, his edits are a fraud, and his bench press contribution spoke danger for Knowledge (XXG). His advice? What advice? He is wrong. His advice was that I might have a close connection to the entry. He was wrong. And so are you for being his crony. Why don't you take a stand. Next time tell your cowardly buddy to write me himself and to stop deleting edits based on his almighty whim. --

490:. Notice how I left a comment for SG below, and tagged my own contribution in the actual text - normally I wouldn't edit at all but I thought this would be clearer. We may look like we're kidding, but editing other comments is taken VERY seriously, and it is the extremely rare exception to do so - protecting privacy, to make them easier to read, removing personal attacks, and little else. This is indeed a blockable offence, so don't take my cavalier treatment as the norm. I'm just a huge rebel... 1817:- it had a quick introduction and one research article that it spoke of. I will be adding multiple sources, etc. But, while I was posting section by section- someone posted a sign at the top the page saying it is a candidate for speedy removal due to lack of citations, etc. I am just about to add my section on the research conducted on it, and would like to put some sort of message at the top that it is in the middle of a large reworking...can you tell me how to do this???-- 2536: 878: 2307: 21: 812: 990:. I'm not sure if it should be all caps, but I don't see much reason for it to be so - much as it's a proper name, it's still a descriptive one, and I don't think it's patented. It's the kind of judgement call that someone very familiar with the subject should make. You may also want to create redirects for 1006:

to the appropriate page. Makes it easier to find. For all wikilinks and search terms, the capitalization of the very first letter doesn't matter, but for subsequent letters it usually does (though the software seems to have gotten smarter recently, so this may have changed). Still, redirects means

1845:

is listed. Henderson is one of the most common surnames in the in the English speaking World! I understand that WLU possibly didn’t know this, but it is much more probable that he didn’t care. Why else would he delete the entry? It is much more possible that he just wanted to reach a higher score on

357:

FYI, you may have run into one of the more frustrating things about wikipedia - the edit conflict (I just did on this talk page). If someone changes the page while you're editing, you get a big nasty message and a long, messy process to sort it out. The only way around it is to make numerous small

2283:

There are problems, but these mostly arise due to incompatibilities between autist and non-autist sensibilities (sounds or smells that bother autists, but are pleasing to non-autists, for instance are very prevalent in the world, but not in nature. The problem, in this case, is man-made and thus is

1836:

You said, “Jeffrey, Note: WLU was just giving you advice that you MAY have a COI -- most likely because the edit you added had the same last name as your username...he's nto accusing, just advising. Threatening other editors and questioning their qualifications is not good practice on wikipedia, as

1597:

The warning you saw was NPOV lv 1. That means it's a level 1 warning for violating the Neutral Point of View policy. Level 1 warnings assume good faith on the part of the editor; that was for someone brand new. I don't think that editor meant to break the rules, they just probably didn't understand

1385:

De nada. I've left you a joke you should probably remove, but I couldn't resist. If you can manage to discuss calmly with the editors (I couldn't but I was younger and more snappish), it'll be a good page. I again think that lowering the bar on WP:RS to include statements from notable proponents

1280:

might apply if we can get the statements for a couple notable people with autism or acting as advocates. But it's a very slippy topics - the BC case about ABA I once saw used to justify the unethical status of ABA, when it's an attempt to force the government to pay for treatment. Same thing Josh

1177:

the statement says 'many' -- that article is talking about only one -- and nowhere do I find in that article a statement about faulty logic. That is why I think that sentence is OR -- an editor is making that statement, rather than reporting on it being made somewhere. I really don't know why this

1035:

A move is a simple adjustment within the wikimedia servers (or something), moving to a pre-existing page is not more complicated, but is more involved. Basically you cut and paste the entire page onto the new one (usually in its own section), trim out any duplication or self-referential links, and

752:

The anon at the Judge Rotenberg center is being very civil and reasonable. Quite unusual in an anon on an article like this one. I'll be making his suggested changes on the page and dropping him a note to thank him for his reasonableness. Again, quite unusual and to be treasured - POV-cranks who

2018:

this article should not be added into wiki rage. i post multiple edits of it as i found someone from unknown IP address has made some changes to it. i again insist that this is purely not an advertisement of some product or company. it is a concept that will start be implementing in near future by

572:

Ah -- I get it. I've had someone suggest we create the following topics: Teaching Family Homes and Reducing Recividism, and Community Reinforcement Approach for Addiction. I don't think they're 'big' enough to qualify, but am trying to find the policy on that...how do I find a page with all the

1601:

I put a note about the warning in the edit summary because it helps others see at a glance whether there have been previous warnings, even if they've been deleted from the talk page. Some users delete the warnings (although obviously they're still there in the history), but putting it in the edit

650:

Before creating those pages, try to figure out if there's an existing page that already covers it, if it should be a separate page or a section in a pre-existing page, if reliable sources exist, and if it's notable. Scholarly topics, pop psychology and branches of stuff are all kinda tenuous for

1840:

My response is: No. That is not correct Mr. Pritchard. WLU did not “just give advice.” WLU deleted my entry. He took action based on his assumption that I am in some way related to the person in the edit. He based this assumption on the fact that we have the same last name. How many surnames are

756:

Another anon is going at the ABA article. It looks like a mess of acceptable edits with the wrong tone and tenuous sourcing. Would you mind having a look at integrating the edits as part of your overall re-working of the article? I hate trying to fix edits like that and it's good practice for

366:

and draft the text there - it's a page that's never linked to mainspace, and basically lets you use all the features without having to worry about edit conflicts. I'll put one on your talk page in just a second. Incidentally, you create italics by either surrounding the text in two apostrophes

375:

uses '''three'''. Easier than the formatting you're using, there's a button on the blue bar above the edit pane that does it for you (the first three are bold, italics, and wikilink respectively). If you're not going to work on the page right now, I suggest pasting the lot into a sub-page and

1915:

Indeed, I'm very impressed with how well you managed a polite and useful response to a rather hostile editor. I appreciate your efforts on my behalf and I would say you are an excellent model for how all editors should interact with others. Though regards actual editing, you really should

1787:

Hi, Josh. I just wanted to apologize for not responding to your posts during most of January. I was involved in an unpleasant ArbCom case, and needed a break to regain my good faith in Knowledge (XXG). I have returned, refreshed and restored, but with less interest in keeping up with the

1920:

Your ability to calmly discuss with others will stand you in good stead in case you do make a mistake. Anyone can add text, but getting along with others is a skill often lacking. Let me know if you're ever up for adminship 'cause based on our interactions you definitely have my vote.

2014:

this approach at the moment is just taught to students in schools and colleges where an extension is required to expand it to higher level where bigger communities should be involved in it to learn cooperation in their activities and missions. this is the whole objective of the article.

2171:(Randy Finder; Kappa chapter alumnus). I think as a general rule, consensus has provided that "notable" be defined as brothers that are well known in the political, business, scientific, sports, or non-profit sectors (citations in the popular press being provided for most notability). 940:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. —

557:

Number of characters added or deleted in each edit. It's gross number, so if you replace 10 000 characters with FUCK 2500 times (seen it happen), it is a net of 0. If you add 2500 FUCK's, it shows up as +10000, if you removed that edit, you'd see -10 000. Nice use of undent.

1549:

Tricky, sneaky and sly, but within policy. Welcome to the dark side of wikilawyering, though your argument would be more convincing if a) there weren't a page history, and b) there wasn't an obviously broken cascade of colons extending from the previous section to this one

1066:

And so the student eclipses the master... Good stuff. I still think that creating the above redirects would be a good thing for people who use different capitals and whatnot - it's good practice because it prevents the page from being created under a different name.

419:

Josh, I left a couple of inline notes to get you started. Do you know how to step through the diffs from the history tab and see comments? You can view my comments that way, and edit them out when you're done. The inline comment is everything between the <!-- --:

1369:

I am venturing there -- but I'm trying to demonstrate that I'm not on some bent or slant...thanks for the heads-up on the Who/Fact stuff...who knew? I just saw that they both made the same effect on the product and have always been using fact :) Thanks again!!

2560:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1647:

At least you gave me credit. It goes both ways - if you find any obscure policies, essays, templates or tools you think are really handy, please let me know. I still very frequently get posts from many different users on neat stuff I didn't know about.

128:

Hi, generally you don't remove anything from any talk page, particularly another editor's talk page. I've reverted your removal, if you feel that there is no more need to communicate, just leave a quick note, or don't bother adding anything to the page.

2010:

i am the creator of this article in wikipedia. i do not believe that it is something which is a marketing of some product. it is a generic theme which is initiated for organizations, associations, communities who are working for cooperative learning.

1553:

Incidentally, I don't really agree with elmindreda that you need to slow down your editing for others, so long as your changes aren't contested, but I do think given the objections to how you're doing so, on a controversial page, a sub-page is a good

2564:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

1457:<--should have an article, they're incredibly weird -- they are hermaphroditic and mate by penis fencing...the winner impales the loser with his penis and injects the sperm--the loser then literally becomes his bitch. Crazy as hell, I think 1837:

it is not community-building behavior. As to WLU's qualification and edit numbers -- his contributions speak for themselves. His advice is very useful, I recommend following it. Josh.Pritchard.DBA (talk) 16:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)”

2416:

that you started in 2007 (I think?). Was wondering if you would have a look at it, since this is in your area of expertise, and maybe make some improvements? I'm not at all involved in your project, just happened across the article.

725:

Incidentally, that's a horrific page that looks like it was created by an academic or undergrad student with no idea of what wikipedia is or how it works. Remember that you're writing for a popular audience, not specialists.

225:- don't put capital letters on ABA unless it's the start of a sentence. Applied Behavior Analysis works in journal articles perhaps, but on wiki it's wikipedia's rules. Also the hallmark of a noob - overcapitalization :) 1602:

summary saves other people from having to hunt through the history. It's mostly relevant for repeat vandals, but sometimes it comes up for other issues too. Besides, it's a good habit to do the edit summary. Check out the

361:

If you leave the template up for more than a couple hours and don't edit, someone should take it down. Usually I only leave it there while I'm actively typing. It's not a 3 days thing. One thing you could do is start a

831:

and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Please don't say 'X started it'. I don't care who started it. Use talk pages to discuss the main page, not to paint your own personal beliefs on the page itself.

1950:

I tried to streamline the section on prompting that I modeled after what was there previously- a real world exmaple, etc. It didn't seem to fit with the new professional language that you added-thank you, it looks much

176:

to the page in a more subtle fashion. I know this was not your intention, but that is how other experienced editors may see it. Try adding the text to the main page, but be sure to have a source, otherwise it's OR.

2490:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2276:

You asked me whether I believe that Autism has no negative effects on me? (Technically you asked me whether I believe it has no negative effect on those diagnosed with it, but misdiagnosis is always an issue).

165:. Basically, they say don't add original analysis, follow our guidelines for comments on talk pages, sign your posts, and only capitalize proper nouns and the first letter in a sentence. You may want to read 1598:

them. NPOV can be hard to write, especially when we're passionate about a subject. I wanted to include an example to help explain the edits too, so hopefully that editor can be more careful in the future.

1021:

Thanks -- I was trying to figure out how to correct the name...I'll move it to the new lowercase name...also, we're thinking about possibly merging with single subject research...how does one do that?

1036:

put a redirect on the old page. I like to use a section redirect - #REDIRECT ] because it's a little more specific. A move is pretty quick, a merge is a lot of gruntwork and proofreading.

268:). It should keep other editors away until you remove it, so you won't run into edit conflicts. Just remember, try to source everything, and avoid 'bragging' or proclaiming about ABA as 315:

If you're done at ABA, make sure you take off the template. If you're not, you're going to run into an edit conflict when you try to save, as SandyGeorgia has already added some text.

1488:

They are a nudibranch which is a type of flatworm that lives undersea -- they're very beautiful, imho. I'm off to 'real' work -- hopefully will have a break there to do some wiki-work

2239:

page? Specifically behaviourism? I know alot of it got removed a while back but I find whats currently written pretty incomprehensible so it may also have that effect on other readers.

1321:

article. I'm guessing you will get a lot of disagreement, but the current version is a discredit to both wikipedia and the movement. Note the variety of templates for fact tagging -

264:

on the top of the page for a while if you're doing a major re-write (i.e. including sections on all four of the major domains of ABA, nudge nudge, unless that's better off at

172:

Another comment - please don't add commentary in footnotes. Footnotes should be used for citations only, adding commentary in them looks like an attempt to add commentary or

1603: 1861:

One does not need to have "qualifications on the bench press" to edit articles about bench press. And having "qualifications on the bench press" as you say constitute

1737:

Thanks a lot for responding. It was my first time with... that kind of NPOV violation, my first reaction was putting an NPOV tag on it - and then asking somebody else.

2556: 748:

Yes, it's addictive here. You'll either end up with thousands of edits, or you'll leave in disgust in a month or so... I hope it's the former :) a couple notes:

615: 376:

working there, then asking me and other editors to look at it before pasting it back to the ABA page proper. No edit conflicts and you can take your time.

2545: 1300: 1273: 2382: 2577: 349: 45: 2123:

Take a look at the first two graphs in that section. Some of the jargon is out of the ken of lay folks. What can be done to help in that respect?

1193: 651:

articles, and hard to write. I've never heard of the things you mention above, but I'd never heard of a neutron cross section before coming here.

1007:

someone knows about other possible names, and has created the appropriate page - saves someone from creating a same page with a different name.

1219: 1201: 677:

good articles on Wiki in the psychology-related realm, although there are numerous featured articles in medicine. You might browse the page,

208:

I'm composing a reply on Talk:ABA, it should be there shortly. I think I may have made an error, more to follow on T:ABA. Sign your posts.

583:

page -- they use 'we need'...I think that's not right -- I put a comment under the history -- they don't have a talk page yet. Am I correct?

2515: 2197: 2164: 449:

SG - sorry, I tweaked it 'cause I think it might be a bit clearer this way. I could also be wrong, feel free revert if I got it wrong.

1178:

page has its own page rather than a subheading under the Autism Rights Movement page...it isn't notable or sourced to support this, imo.

390: 2167:, since I am just one editor out of several that have edited the page. I think the vast majority of research for that list was done by 1884: 1851: 1414:

I think getting wikipedia jokes, or worse, making them on wikipedia, puts people (i.e. you and I) into a whole new realm of geekdom.

2386: 504:

Don't worry -- I've read about editing comments for content...I'll definitely respect the policy. Thank you guys for all your help!!

2034: 300:

might be useful - the most basic summaries of the big policies. If you're not sure about something, try referring to those pages.

67: 2511: 254:

Your contributions seem to be fine, so I'm going to leave the article with you for a while. You may want to add the template

62: 2451: 2432: 528:

What is the number (its green or red) that I see when I'm looking at my 'watch page' for instance, the (+259) and the (-27):

2374: 2318: 1991: 1200:

in mainspace. Not sure what you mean by the article becoming a subheading of itself, though. Were you perhaps thinking of

2216:

Let me know what you have in mind. I'm the one who did most of the research on the Notable Alpha Phi Omega wikipedia page.

1847: 2378: 901: 531:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:Josh.Pritchard.DBA‎; 19:50 . . (+259) . . Josh.Pritchard.DBA (Talk | contribs) (→Keep going) 194:

could you point me to a) the footnote, and b) the original analysis...I'm not sure what I'm doing incorrectly. Thanks!!

2574: 1674:

reflex, i.e. the unsourced "some call her" thing you added a sourced counterpoint to still had to go. Happy editing. --

2549: 2502:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

72: 2507: 820: 828: 533:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:SandyGeorgia‎; 19:48 . . (+9,144) . . Fowler&fowler (Talk | contribs) (→Louis Slotin) 2019:

communities who are working in cooperation learning to adopt an institutionalize approach to cooperative learning.

681:, to see if you can find something you can compare to, although you should realize that some older FAs aren't up to 2128: 2097: 2054: 1691:

Works for me -- I just wanted it to be clear she didn't consider herself an activisit, nothing taken personally :)

932: 541:(diff) (hist) . . Talk:Applied behavior analysis‎; 16:52 . . (+560) . . WLU (Talk | contribs) (→Sources - favour?) 258: 905: 2445: 2422: 1454: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 719: 580: 52: 41: 2201: 1771: 1753: 1728: 1614: 1276:- no real sources, all OR, etc. I still say it's valuable info/opinions to have and document, but not as is. 166: 2163:

If you have questions or concerns regarding who is notable and who isn't, it might be better to raise them at

79: 2571: 2252: 2176: 2138: 2110: 2071: 1969: 1902: 1692: 1625: 1535: 1489: 1458: 1401: 1371: 1259: 1227: 1179: 1053: 1022: 961: 850: 791: 584: 543: 505: 394: 341: 195: 2193: 2022: 1866: 1575:

Who would have thought that penis fencing was a blue link? Knowledge (XXG) editors are a bunch of pervs.

897: 337: 329:

So this template is not a thing to do for the next 3 days while i'm re-working...it is something to put up

83: 2280:

And my answer is: Correct. I do not think Autism has any inherent negative effects on those who have it.

1796: 1318: 1109: 1102: 780: 709: 471: 436: 2503: 2390: 1162:

However, I'm leaving it as it is as the section below it already deals with this part of the argument. --

95: 87: 2441: 2289: 2124: 2093: 2050: 2030: 1534:

I'm not chatting -- obviously we're talking about whether or not to include a new article in wikipedia.

987: 926: 885: 871: 2452:

Talk:Applied behavior analysis#Merging_the_articles_Applied_behavior_analysis_and_Behavior_modification

776: 57: 535:(diff) (hist) . . Applied behavior analysis‎; 19:29 . . (-27) . . WLU (Talk | contribs) (dangling ABA) 2418: 1874: 1870: 1679: 1308: 1249: 1226:. Do you see a reason it should not? I don't see that much extra information in the 'main article' 1209: 1167: 815:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a

2479: 2470: 896:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

539:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:WLU‎; 18:51 . . (+303) . . WLU (Talk | contribs) (→Nraden and I - reply) 2413: 2398: 2366: 2343: 2285: 1995: 1767: 1760: 1749: 1724: 1610: 1240:

I'm not sure. I'll have to get back to you on that. Too much toothache today (yes, really, and I

463:

Thanks! (Although we should remind Josh never to edit someone else's talk page comment, LOL !!!)

2499: 2483: 358:

edits rather than big ones, but then you get bashed for cluttering up the servers. You can't win.

297: 2172: 48:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 1865:. I do not know if he deleted your edit based on last name. It might have been based on lack of 1197: 1126: 682: 537:(diff) (hist) . . User:Josh.Pritchard.DBA‎; 19:23 . . (+32) . . WLU (Talk | contribs) (sub-page) 480:

Josh - never edit another user's talk page comments. It is VERY BAD! There's even a warning -

20: 911:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

94:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 2355: 2351: 2236: 2067: 1956: 1822: 1789: 1713:

Hi - you left a request on my page regarding the, now deleted, "Armenian Forgeries" article -

1418:

look down on us. The only organisism who envy our sex lives are those that reproduce through

1141: 942: 892:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 702: 698: 690: 654:

If there's no talk page, create it by clicking on the red discussion tab and edit as normal.

464: 429: 2495: 2487: 1917: 1788:

autism-related articles. I know you're in good hands with WLU and Eubulides. Best regards,

983: 979: 975: 893: 816: 623: 273: 158: 154: 2221: 2026: 484: 2498:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2491: 2332: 1862: 1716:

Have I fulfilled your expectations on your request? Please note whether I have or haven't.

1671: 1503: 1342: 1277: 889: 824: 673:

Hi, Josh; no, I haven't found a good article for you to compare to. The problem is, there

632: 1675: 1664: 1304: 1245: 1205: 1163: 1154: 916: 678: 363: 293: 173: 150: 2070:, specifically the behavior analysis area...check it out and let me know your thoughts! 1281:

noticed. I think the page can be gutted, and probably just redirected to the section.

827:

about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting

2394: 2331:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1842: 1814: 1419: 686: 576:

I don't think I should indent further when I'm adding to my last comment -- am I right?

888:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

877: 628: 276:

applies and we can't say 'X is the best/only/truest whatever ever', unless there is a

2240: 1926: 1892: 1653: 1580: 1566: 1558: 1511: 1479: 1427: 1391: 1350: 1335: 1286: 1223: 1072: 1041: 1012: 930:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 837: 766: 731: 659: 563: 495: 454: 402: 381: 320: 305: 272:

anything. It's hard for a noob to grasp (particularly a noob who is an expert), but

230: 213: 182: 134: 118: 2306: 2581: 2541: 2526: 2519: 2464: 2426: 2402: 2314: 2293: 2260: 2243: 2225: 2205: 2180: 2146: 2132: 2118: 2101: 2079: 2058: 2038: 2000: 1977: 1960: 1952: 1930: 1910: 1896: 1878: 1855: 1826: 1818: 1800: 1774: 1731: 1700: 1683: 1657: 1633: 1618: 1606:

for a full explanation of all the different levels and how the templates are used.

1584: 1570: 1543: 1515: 1497: 1483: 1471:

Aren't they a type of flatworm or slug? That I know this means I should not breed.

1466: 1431: 1409: 1395: 1379: 1354: 1325: 1312: 1290: 1267: 1253: 1235: 1213: 1204:? I'll watch this talk page in case you prefer to continue the discussion here. -- 1187: 1171: 1076: 1061: 1045: 1030: 1016: 969: 952: 858: 841: 799: 784: 770: 753:

don't bother adhering to policy are one of the main reasons people leave wikipedia.

735: 713: 663: 592: 567: 551: 513: 499: 475: 458: 440: 406: 385: 324: 309: 234: 217: 203: 186: 138: 122: 2440:

I wanted to know if you could reply to my comment on the talk page to merge the

2217: 2168: 1118: 285: 265: 110:

To e-mail me -- josh (AT) joshpritchard.com...otherwise, leave me notes here :)

689:, and I'm not sure how much comparative value that will have. You can look at 2361:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1112:

is in fact supported by the references in the article, for example this one:

281: 1386:

is a good idea, but you'll have to bring that up on the talk page itself.

98:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place 113:

Note that generally I don't do e-mail for on-wiki questions or comments.

2457: 1990:

Looks like you've got it in the right spot. Working now? You may need to

1922: 1888: 1649: 1576: 1562: 1507: 1475: 1423: 1387: 1346: 1282: 1196:

for the "many" bit. I can verify it from experience, but that (rightly)

1068: 1037: 1008: 833: 762: 727: 655: 559: 491: 450: 424: 398: 377: 316: 301: 226: 222: 209: 178: 162: 130: 114: 2190:

I just want to know what they eat, and what the yearly activities are!

811: 2486:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1415: 790:

glad you're no longer an anon :) Here's to lots of fun coroborediting.

1670:

Sorry for clobbering your edit right away. Nothing personal, just my

1763:

redirects to "behaviorism" within wikipedia. Are they the same thing?

1400:

Hehe -- funny joke -- its bad that you left it and that I got it ;-)

694: 2273:

This is a very late reply to question you asked me on my talk page.

1887:), and congratulations to Igorberger and JP in keeping their cool. 2092:

That *is* a task. I'll do what I can as I am able. That OK by you?

1883:

There is a detailed discussion of my rationale on JPH's talk page (

1272:

Note that that section has basically the same problems I cited on

91: 1122: 289: 960:

I've tried to update it and put a hangon tag...is it good now?

26: 1609:

I hope this answers your question. Let me know if it doesn't.

2305: 1813:

I am currently working on improving a VERY short article on

936:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

876: 288:

is bullshit; try to wrap your head around that, and you may

2544:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2251:

I'm interested in the behaviorism aspect, yes. Are you?

2109:

Yes -- I would appreciate your help VERY much. Thanks!

2540:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1644: 1098: 2338:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

1743:

I took a look at your user page - What exactly is DBA?

1192:

Hmm, true, the faulty logic bit is OR. I'm gathering

1740:

Do you regularly take a look at NPOV tagged articles?

1258:

Yikes -- toothaches are NO good :( Feel better soon!

823:

are for discussion related to improving the article,

2137:

Ok -- I'll take a look as soon as possible, thanks!

1224:

Autism_rights#Ethical_challenges_to_autism_treatment

421:

tags; also doesn't appear on the page when you save.

2284:not inherent to autism, but instead to 'society'.) 635:- discusses what should, and should not be on wiki. 2557:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Los Horcones 2412:Hey, just made a few cosmetic improvements to the 1052:I just moved it--that way the talk goes with it :) 757:editing. So I'm technically doing you a favour... 2478:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1506:You can get banned for just chatting. Ingrate. 1442:Should Pseudobiceros hancockanus be a new article 393:- here you go. You can also access it from your 2448:article, as ABA is the new term of Behavior mod. 2385:can result in deletion without discussion, and 1127:"Living with autism in a world made for others" 1453:Well -- I think our sex lives are better than 890:section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion 1502:Beautiful? You're an interesting guy Josh. 1474:Penis fencing. Tee hee. Get back to work! 8: 1504:WIKPEDIA IS NOT A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE!!!! 1274:Talk:Ethical challenges to autism treatment 2235:Hi. Are you still wanting to clean up the 1108:Hi there. The statement you removed from 982:to see if the page might better be called/ 900:subjects and should provide references to 597:Are you perhaps looking for the following? 78:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 15: 2546:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 2350:notice, but please explain why in your 1317:Venture bravely but carefully into the 616:Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines 428:I'll check in periodically. Welcome ! 25: 2049:I'll try. What do you have in mind? -- 1220:ethical challenges to autism treatment 1202:ethical challenges to autism treatment 1150: 1139: 280:authoritative source. The article on 102:before the question. Again, welcome! 169:for a quick overview of wikipedia. 7: 2165:Talk:List of Alpha Phi Omega members 685:. The only recent psychology FA is 974:Hi Josh, you may want to check out 391:User:Josh.Pritchard.DBA/ABA_sandbox 53:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 2333:deleted for any of several reasons 2321:because of the following concern: 371:after the software has it's way. 44:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 2554:The article will be discussed at 2504:review the candidates' statements 2302:Proposed deletion of Los Horcones 333:I'm working, and then take down? 27:Click here to leave a new message 2534: 1218:Yes -- I think that the article 821:Judge Rotenberg Education Center 810: 19: 2006:cooperative learning institute: 40:Hello, Josh.Pritchard.DBA, and 2510:. For the Election committee, 2480:Arbitration Committee election 2471:ArbCom elections are now open! 2433:Talk:Applied Behavior Analysis 1: 2520:13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 2465:21:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2001:02:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1978:01:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1961:01:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1879:09:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1856:08:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1827:17:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 1299:Sorry about the delay. I've 1268:20:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 1254:20:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 1236:19:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 1214:19:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 1188:19:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 1172:09:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 1062:18:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1046:18:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1031:17:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1017:15:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 970:17:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 953:16:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 859:19:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 842:18:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 800:10:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 785:17:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 771:21:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 736:21:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 714:13:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC) 664:21:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 593:20:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 568:20:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 552:20:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 514:19:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 500:19:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 476:19:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 459:19:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 441:19:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 407:19:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 386:19:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 325:19:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 310:16:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 235:16:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 218:16:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 204:16:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 187:15:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 139:14:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 123:14:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 1901:Yay me for keeping my cool! 1801:22:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 1775:02:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 1732:04:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 68:How to write a great article 18: 2582:14:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 2506:and submit your choices on 2427:22:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 2408:Behavior management article 2403:06:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2389:allows discussion to reach 1841:listed in Knowledge (XXG)? 1719:Thank you for reading this, 1701:01:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 1684:00:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 1658:22:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 1634:02:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 1619:02:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 1585:16:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 1571:16:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 1544:21:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1516:21:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1498:21:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1484:21:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1467:21:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1432:21:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1410:21:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1396:21:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1380:21:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1355:21:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 1313:22:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 1291:22:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 1077:22:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 1004:Single Case Research Design 1000:single case research design 996:single-case research design 992:Single-Case Research Design 849:Thanks -- Sorry 'bout that! 775:Thank you for welcoming me 2597: 2512:MediaWiki message delivery 2326:no assertion of notability 2226:04:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 2206:13:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 1561:, or that hancock thing? 284:isn't even allowed to say 2446:Applied behavior analysis 2375:Proposed Deletion process 2294:08:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 2186:Pseudobiceros hancockanus 2181:16:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 2147:05:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 2133:03:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 2119:03:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 2102:03:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 2080:03:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 2066:Cleanup of this article: 2059:03:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 2039:14:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC) 1994:to make the script load. 1931:14:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1911:00:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1897:00:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1455:Pseudobiceros hancockanus 884:A tag has been placed on 720:Positive behavior support 581:Positive_behavior_support 96:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 2548:or whether it should be 2256: 2142: 2114: 2075: 1973: 1906: 1848:Jeffrey Pierce Henderson 1696: 1629: 1539: 1493: 1462: 1405: 1375: 1263: 1231: 1183: 1057: 1026: 965: 854: 795: 588: 547: 509: 199: 2383:Speedy Deletion process 2356:the article's talk page 2261:00:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC) 2244:13:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 933:the article's talk page 2438:Hi Josh.Pritchard.DBA, 2310: 1319:Autism rights movement 1222:should be merged into 1149:Check date values in: 1110:autism rights movement 1103:Autism rights movement 881: 825:not general discussion 2484:Arbitration Committee 2442:Behavior modification 2387:Articles for Deletion 2319:proposed for deletion 2309: 1604:template warning page 988:single subject design 886:Single Subject Design 880: 872:Single Subject Design 819:, talk pages such as 1992:WP:Bypass your cache 1244:get back to you). -- 894:Knowledge (XXG):Stub 167:this essay for noobs 2488:arbitration process 2414:Behavior management 1761:Behavioral analysis 1301:replied tentatively 1117:Gajilan, A. Chris ( 870:Speedy deletion of 2500:arbitration policy 2379:deletion processes 2311: 2253:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 2139:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 2111:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 2072:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1970:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1903:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1693:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1626:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1593:What warnings mean 1536:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1490:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1459:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1402:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1372:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1260:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1228:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1180:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1054:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 1023:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 962:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 882: 851:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 829:our reference desk 792:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 701:if they'll help. 585:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 544:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 506:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 367:''thus'' becoming 342:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 196:Josh.Pritchard.DBA 63:How to edit a page 46:your contributions 2444:article into the 2237:child development 2231:Child development 2208: 2196:comment added by 2068:child development 2041: 2025:comment added by 1968:Thanks Svernon! 1624:it does, thanks! 1557:So, do we create 699:Asperger syndrome 691:Tourette syndrome 579:Anyways --on the 427: 354: 340:comment added by 259:underconstruction 86:your messages on 33: 32: 2588: 2538: 2537: 2462: 2372: 2371: 2365: 2349: 2348: 2342: 2191: 2159:Re: APO Notables 2125:A little mollusk 2094:A little mollusk 2051:A little mollusk 2020: 1793: 1340: 1334: 1330: 1324: 1158: 1152: 1147: 1145: 1137: 1135: 1134: 1097:Concerning your 949: 946: 922: 921: 915: 908:their content. 902:reliable sources 814: 706: 620: 614: 489: 483: 468: 433: 422: 353: 334: 292:WP:NPOV. Also, 263: 257: 101: 88:discussion pages 23: 16: 2596: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2567: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2508:the voting page 2474: 2458: 2436: 2419:Hires an editor 2410: 2369: 2363: 2362: 2346: 2340: 2339: 2304: 2271: 2233: 2214: 2212:Notable for APO 2188: 2161: 2090: 2047: 2008: 1988: 1945: 1834: 1808: 1791: 1785: 1711: 1668: 1665:Michelle Dawson 1642: 1595: 1533:<undent: --> 1444: 1368:<undent: --> 1338: 1332: 1328: 1322: 1148: 1138: 1132: 1130: 1116: 1106: 947: 944: 919: 913: 912: 875: 808: 743: 723: 704: 618: 612: 527:<UnDent: --> 487: 481: 466: 431: 335: 261: 255: 249: 147: 108: 99: 73:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 2594: 2592: 2533: 2532: 2530: 2525:Nomination of 2523: 2477: 2473: 2468: 2456: 2454: 2449: 2439: 2435: 2430: 2409: 2406: 2393:for deletion. 2373:will stop the 2329: 2328: 2303: 2300: 2298: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2232: 2229: 2213: 2210: 2198:204.185.139.31 2187: 2184: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2046: 2043: 2007: 2004: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1843:Clan Henderson 1833: 1830: 1815:social stories 1807: 1804: 1784: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1764: 1756: 1747: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1722: 1720: 1710: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1667: 1661: 1641: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1611:WeisheitSuchen 1594: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1555: 1551: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1472: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1420:binary fission 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1160: 1159: 1105: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 874: 868: 866: 864: 863: 862: 861: 807: 804: 803: 802: 759: 758: 754: 742: 739: 722: 717: 687:parapsychology 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 652: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 626: 621: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 577: 574: 573:policy topics? 542: 540: 538: 536: 534: 532: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 444: 443: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 359: 332: 331:at the moment 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 149:Please review 146: 143: 142: 141: 107: 104: 76: 75: 70: 65: 60: 55: 31: 30: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2593: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2566: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2528: 2524: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2472: 2469: 2467: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2453: 2447: 2443: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2415: 2407: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2368: 2359: 2357: 2353: 2345: 2336: 2334: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2320: 2316: 2308: 2301: 2299: 2296: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2281: 2278: 2274: 2269:Reply: Autism 2268: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2238: 2230: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2211: 2209: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2185: 2183: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2158: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2087: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2044: 2042: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2016: 2012: 2005: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1998: 1993: 1985: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1948: 1942: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1919: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867:WP:notability 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1838: 1831: 1829: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1811: 1805: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1782: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1726: 1717: 1714: 1708: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1666: 1663:Your edit on 1662: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1646: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1605: 1599: 1592: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559:penis fencing 1556: 1552: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1341:, as well as 1337: 1327: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198:doesn't count 1195: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1156: 1143: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1111: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 972: 971: 967: 963: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 951: 950: 939: 935: 934: 929: 928: 918: 909: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 879: 873: 869: 867: 860: 856: 852: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 839: 835: 830: 826: 822: 818: 813: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 788: 787: 786: 782: 778: 773: 772: 768: 764: 755: 751: 750: 749: 746: 741:Various anons 740: 738: 737: 733: 729: 721: 718: 716: 715: 711: 707: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 634: 630: 627: 625: 622: 617: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 596: 595: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 575: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 556: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 529: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 501: 497: 493: 486: 479: 478: 477: 473: 469: 462: 461: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 446: 445: 442: 438: 434: 426: 418: 417: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 389: 388: 387: 383: 379: 374: 370: 365: 360: 356: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 330: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 260: 252: 246: 236: 232: 228: 224: 221: 220: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 175: 170: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 144: 140: 136: 132: 127: 126: 125: 124: 120: 116: 111: 106:Notes to Josh 105: 103: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 74: 71: 69: 66: 64: 61: 59: 56: 54: 51: 50: 49: 47: 43: 38: 37: 28: 22: 17: 2569: 2568: 2563: 2555: 2553: 2542:Los Horcones 2529:for deletion 2527:Los Horcones 2475: 2459: 2437: 2411: 2381:exist. The 2377:, but other 2360: 2352:edit summary 2337: 2330: 2325: 2315:Los Horcones 2313:The article 2312: 2297: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2272: 2234: 2215: 2189: 2162: 2091: 2048: 2017: 2013: 2009: 1996: 1989: 1949: 1946: 1839: 1835: 1812: 1809: 1786: 1718: 1715: 1712: 1669: 1643: 1608: 1600: 1596: 1532: 1367: 1241: 1161: 1131:. Retrieved 1107: 943: 937: 931: 924: 910: 883: 865: 817:general rule 809: 777:Truthapedian 774: 760: 747: 744: 724: 674: 672: 530: 526: 423:modified by 372: 368: 345: 336:— Preceding 277: 269: 253: 250: 171: 148: 145:Some reading 112: 109: 77: 39: 35: 34: 2192:—Preceding 2027:Azamishaque 2021:—Preceding 1871:Igor Berger 1783:Catching up 1119:February 22 925:the top of 286:creationism 266:behaviorism 90:using four 2496:topic bans 2450:See here: 2367:dated prod 2344:dated prod 2045:Challenge? 1746:Sincerely, 1721:Sincerely, 1676:elmindreda 1305:elmindreda 1246:elmindreda 1206:elmindreda 1164:elmindreda 1133:2007-11-07 247:Keep going 100:{{helpme}} 80:Wikipedian 2492:site bans 2395:Ironholds 2391:consensus 2317:has been 1997:Gimmetrow 1951:better!-- 1918:BE BOLD!! 1806:RE: Help! 761:Thanks! 745:Hi Josh, 395:user page 298:WP:SIMPLE 282:evolution 251:Hi Josh, 82:! Please 2286:Robrecht 2241:Fainites 2194:unsigned 2173:Dr. Cash 2035:contribs 2023:unsigned 1986:Monobook 1709:Kirlston 1416:Trekkies 1142:cite web 927:the page 683:standard 364:sub page 350:contribs 338:unsigned 223:MOS:CAPS 163:MOS:CAPS 58:Tutorial 36:Welcome! 2550:deleted 2455:Thanks! 1953:Svernon 1947:Hello, 1943:RE: ABA 1819:Svernon 1810:Hello, 1792:Georgia 1331:versus 1303:now. -- 1194:sources 980:WP:CAPS 976:WP:NAME 948:Annyong 898:notable 806:Warning 705:Georgia 624:WP:TONE 485:uw-tpv3 467:Georgia 432:Georgia 274:WP:NPOV 159:WP:SIGN 155:WP:TALK 42:welcome 2482:. The 2354:or on 2218:Naraht 2169:Naraht 1863:WP:COI 1768:Kiyarr 1750:Kiyarr 1725:Kiyarr 1672:WP:BLP 1645:Thief! 1640:Thief! 1343:others 1278:WP:IAR 1151:|date= 938:speedy 917:hangon 906:verify 695:autism 675:are no 633:WP:NOT 92:tildes 1790:Sandy 1554:idea. 1129:. CNN 984:moved 945:Hello 904:that 703:Sandy 679:WP:FA 465:Sandy 430:Sandy 294:WP:5P 174:WP:OR 151:WP:OR 2516:talk 2423:talk 2399:talk 2290:talk 2257:talk 2222:talk 2202:talk 2177:talk 2143:talk 2129:talk 2115:talk 2098:talk 2088:Wow! 2076:talk 2055:talk 2031:talk 1974:talk 1957:talk 1927:talk 1907:talk 1893:talk 1885:here 1875:talk 1852:talk 1823:talk 1797:Talk 1697:talk 1680:talk 1654:talk 1630:talk 1615:talk 1581:talk 1567:talk 1540:talk 1512:talk 1494:talk 1480:talk 1463:talk 1428:talk 1406:talk 1392:talk 1376:talk 1351:talk 1336:fact 1309:talk 1287:talk 1264:talk 1250:talk 1242:will 1232:talk 1210:talk 1184:talk 1168:talk 1155:help 1123:2007 1099:edit 1073:talk 1058:talk 1042:talk 1027:talk 1013:talk 1002:and 978:and 966:talk 855:talk 838:talk 796:talk 781:talk 767:talk 732:talk 710:Talk 697:and 660:talk 631:and 629:WP:N 589:talk 564:talk 548:talk 510:talk 496:talk 472:Talk 455:talk 437:Talk 403:talk 382:talk 373:Bold 369:thus 346:talk 321:talk 306:talk 296:and 290:grok 278:very 231:talk 214:talk 200:talk 183:talk 161:and 135:talk 119:talk 84:sign 2476:Hi, 2460:ATC 1923:WLU 1889:WLU 1832:WLU 1772:ton 1770:lls 1754:ton 1752:lls 1729:ton 1727:lls 1650:WLU 1577:WLU 1563:WLU 1508:WLU 1476:WLU 1424:WLU 1422:. 1388:WLU 1347:WLU 1326:who 1283:WLU 1125:). 1101:of 1069:WLU 1038:WLU 1009:WLU 986:to 923:to 834:WLU 763:WLU 728:WLU 656:WLU 560:WLU 492:WLU 451:WLU 425:WLU 420:--> 399:WLU 378:WLU 317:WLU 302:WLU 270:the 227:WLU 210:WLU 179:WLU 131:WLU 115:WLU 2552:. 2518:) 2494:, 2425:) 2401:) 2370:}} 2364:{{ 2358:. 2347:}} 2341:{{ 2335:. 2292:) 2259:) 2224:) 2204:) 2179:) 2145:) 2131:) 2117:) 2100:) 2078:) 2057:) 2037:) 2033:• 1976:) 1959:) 1929:) 1909:) 1895:) 1877:) 1869:. 1854:) 1825:) 1799:) 1766:-- 1723:-- 1699:) 1682:) 1656:) 1632:) 1617:) 1583:) 1569:) 1550::P 1542:) 1514:) 1496:) 1482:) 1465:) 1430:) 1408:) 1394:) 1378:) 1353:) 1345:. 1339:}} 1333:{{ 1329:}} 1323:{{ 1311:) 1289:) 1266:) 1252:) 1234:) 1212:) 1186:) 1170:) 1146:: 1144:}} 1140:{{ 1121:, 1075:) 1060:) 1044:) 1029:) 1015:) 998:, 994:, 968:) 920:}} 914:{{ 857:) 840:) 798:) 783:) 769:) 734:) 712:) 693:, 662:) 619:}} 613:{{ 591:) 566:) 550:) 512:) 498:) 488:}} 482:{{ 474:) 457:) 439:) 405:) 397:. 384:) 352:) 348:• 323:) 308:) 262:}} 256:{{ 233:) 216:) 202:) 185:) 157:, 153:, 137:) 121:) 29:. 2578:W 2575:P 2572:T 2570:~ 2514:( 2421:( 2397:( 2288:( 2255:( 2220:( 2200:( 2175:( 2141:( 2127:( 2113:( 2096:( 2074:( 2053:( 2029:( 1972:( 1955:( 1925:( 1905:( 1891:( 1873:( 1850:( 1821:( 1795:( 1695:( 1678:( 1652:( 1628:( 1613:( 1579:( 1565:( 1538:( 1510:( 1492:( 1478:( 1461:( 1426:( 1404:( 1390:( 1374:( 1349:( 1307:( 1285:( 1262:( 1248:( 1230:( 1208:( 1182:( 1166:( 1157:) 1153:( 1136:. 1071:( 1056:( 1040:( 1025:( 1011:( 964:( 853:( 836:( 794:( 779:( 765:( 730:( 708:( 658:( 587:( 562:( 546:( 508:( 494:( 470:( 453:( 435:( 401:( 380:( 344:( 319:( 304:( 229:( 212:( 198:( 181:( 133:( 117:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index