995:
653:
434:
934:
588:
unblock|How are my edits vandalism? I'll concede I violated 3RR, but so did
Sceptre. However, I take umbrage to this allegation that my edits were trolling or vandalism. In fact, I made only one edit to the Discrimination against the homeless, only asking for citations, just as Mr. Jimmy Wales has
382:
Hi JustGettingItRight, the edited version does appears tobe work of the vandal. That is why I'm reverting the article. The sources are questionable, it appears tobe work of
Japanese/Chinese nationalists trying to link their languages to ancient Korean language.--Korsentry 06:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
761:
The reason for blocking, according to the block log, is "trolling, edit-warring, and vandalism". You can dispute the trolling and vandalism charges, and it's a subjective enough area that many people would probably agree with you - some would see certain contributions as more like attempts to cause
738:
That wasn't my edit and I did that unintentionally. I reverted the AfD closure by a non-admin. If I reverted vandalism unintentionally by the revert war (which I admit and wish to discuss separately if you have time), I apologize, but it was unintentional and it got caught up in what I admit to be
635:
That wasn't my edit and I did that unintentionally. I reverted the AfD closure by a non-admin. If I reverted vandalism unintentionally by the revert war (which I admit and wish to discuss separately if you have time), I apologize, but it was unintentional and it got caught up in what I admit to be
292:
You can't cite a discussion from a year ago which had a equivalent number of commentators for your proposal (the initial question was about the category being too strict, not about your proposal) and call that the real consensus opposed to the discussion from last month. You had over a month and a
72:
Please consider reverting your second attempt to modify the definition and please continue the talk page discussion. We may generate a new consensus that says a person should only be categorized as an
American Criminal if they are solely notable for their crime(s). But the burden of persuasion is
589:
asked for. It is clear that admins block for political reasons and because of this, it is no wonder people ridicule
Knowledge (XXG) and view it dimly as a source. I am done with this project. The intentions are noble, but for the reason given for the block, this is clearly an ideological block.
222:
because of the person's prior notability). Your current version, with the or operator, would ensnare a lot of people adjudged innocent in a court of law. I posted a RfC under the biography category as I wish we can get some collaboration on this timely. Feel free to ask me any other questions or
213:
I posted a discusion topic back in
February, it was assented to by David, and over a month and a half went by without any further comment. In actuality, my main intent was to add a critia of notability to the offense, and I corrected the solely notable criterion, which was an archaic remnant when
62:
If you review the prior discussions on this topic, you'll see I've argued for a strict interpretation of the "solely notable" criterion. But consensus did not go my way. I hope you see from my examples on the talk page that there really are a lot of articles in the category that fit under the
256:
I'm not edit warring, you are. I posted this discussion item and it did receive assent from another editor (David) and was open for discussion for a month and a half. You had ample opportunity to comment then. Why is it so hard for you to make your case on the talk page?
856:
To be clear: at this point, I am not changing my decision. The edit war is enough to earn the block. However, I also will not deny the additional unblock request; The original blocking admin or another admin can examine it to see if she/he thinks it appropriate to unblock.
965:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
273:
I am making my case - but I just can't find any discussion of consensus to remove a logical criteria that already had been discussed and achieved consensus among more than just two editors. You still haven't explained your objection to it in a way that makes sense.
52:
Hello JGIR. I join SI in welcoming you. An invitation to discuss a contested matter on the
Category's talk page is just about the opposite of an invitation to re-revert. You've unwittingly stumbled into a thicket. I regret that. One of our big rules is
884:
Fair enough, but why hasn't the other party been blocked as well? I sincerely feel there is an ideological bias here, for the reasons given for the block rather than the block itself. Secondly, why is a 3RR block, which this wasn't, as long as it is?
327:
Feel free to contact me if need be, but I won't edit, talk, or check my messages for at least 48 hours. I am going to sign off and only use
Knowledge (XXG) for reference (i.e. learning stuff a lot quicker than reading the textbook) during this time.
237:
I don't see any discussion of the deletion, you just post it and say you'll delete it if no one objects. That's not really a consensus. Last year we had an actual discusion with a real consensus - look in the archives. Please don't edit war.
786:
for the specific "bright line" that you crossed (and that the other editor did not). I note that this isn't the first time you've been involved in repeatedly reverting other users' edits. In future, please use our
293:
half to comment on the definition, which you did not do. I expect the definition to be reworked drastically (it will not be the current version), but let the talk page process play out. Your version has adverse
961:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
104:
100:
607:, you added, "In most cases body parts go EVERY WHERE. This is also rude to those who are around you as they might faint at the sight of blood and gore." You seriously deny that is vandalism?
519:
How are my edits at
Discrimination against the homeless and Suicide methods trolling? These were good faith edits and it appears I am being blocked for some rouge reason without any warning.
63:
consensus formulation, but don't under your new one. But if I start pruning Otto Kerner, Billy Cannon and the others, based on your edit, a big kerfuffle will ensue. Another big rule is
96:
89:
347:
Hi JustGettingItRight, just wanted to give you a heads up that I've written a note on the talk page of this article asking you to clarify your recent changes. Thanks. --
1022:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on
Knowledge (XXG) (see
693:
474:
1018:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
955:
189:
Revert to consensus that was developed after over month of discussion. Prior version violates WP:BLP and must be reverted. Please participate in ongoing talk.
830:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
581:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
26:
67:. Arguably, that's what I'd be doing if I started trying to rescue Leadbelly from the American Criminal categorization. (Although I'm sorely tempted.)
966:
962:
688:
469:
970:
815:
566:
139:
865:
615:
542:
424:
950:
but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in
Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to
399:
707:
488:
30:
421:
1010:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
783:
194:
But I don't see any discussion about deleting that criteria. Can you please point me to the month-long discussion of it?
103:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page,
1023:
131:
771:
666:
447:
42:
34:
22:
660:
441:
665:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
446:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1006:
951:
942:
135:
126:
886:
872:
740:
671:
637:
622:
590:
549:
452:
363:
329:
298:
258:
224:
412:
You have been blocked for 48hrs for disruptive editing, vandalism, edit-warring and trolling, for instance
387:
395:
145:
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
38:
767:
281:
245:
201:
173:
78:
947:
779:
29:. If you still believe the category should change, I'd invite you to participate in a new discussion
352:
910:
838:
792:
1015:
858:
608:
535:
111:
64:
1081:
1068:
978:
391:
99:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page,
1019:
138:
and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at
54:
994:
824:
575:
276:
240:
196:
168:
150:
74:
1036:
906:
294:
1064:
604:
531:
348:
1011:
788:
763:
739:
an edit war. However, I was not "trolling" or intentionally vandalising either article.
636:
an edit war. However, I was not "trolling" or intentionally vandalising either article.
165:
25:; there was a lengthy discussion on the subject before you got here, which can be found
21:
Hello, JustGettingItRight, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). I've reverted your edits to
1042:
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
1085:
1077:
982:
974:
922:
894:
879:
850:
804:
748:
645:
629:
598:
556:
427:
371:
356:
337:
306:
287:
266:
251:
232:
207:
179:
154:
114:
82:
46:
933:
146:
218:
criterion was used (the intent being that a person's crime is notable and not
33:. Again, welcome to Knowledge (XXG), and please don't hesitate to contact me
134:, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to
95:
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located
57:
and I sure don't want to scare off someone who could be a great new editor.
973:. Thank you. here are also several other problems listed at the talk page.
837:
One unblock request at a time, please. I've disabled the second request.
73:
on those seeking to change consensus. Thanks for hearing me out. Cheers,
946:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under
105:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Obama articles/Workshop
101:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Obama articles/Evidence
1049:
the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click
1063:
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off
993:
932:
651:
432:
130:. You've indicated that the image meets Knowledge (XXG)'s
1039:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
812:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
563:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
832:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
583:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1050:
721:
717:
711:
702:
698:
684:
680:
676:
502:
498:
492:
483:
479:
465:
461:
457:
417:
413:
90:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Obama articles
659:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
440:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
343:
Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration
988:
Orphaned non-free image File:FreeRepublicTeaBag.jpg
969:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
929:Fair use rationale for File:FreeRepublicTeaBag.jpg
120:Fair use rationale for File:FreeRepublicTeaBag.jpg
37:if you ever have any questions about anything.
8:
65:don't edit other pages just to prove a point
530:{{subst:I have only examined the edits at
140:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
940:Thanks for uploading or contributing to
778:Edit warring is a different matter. See
768:to harm the integrity of Knowledge (XXG)
110:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
909:before using unblock again. Regards,
297:implications that are not acceptable.
1056:To opt out of these bot messages, add
7:
534:, but they are clearly vandalism.}}
1014:. However, the image is currently
14:
164:There's a question for you here:
323:Taking a WikiBreak for 48 hours
971:Media copyright questions page
772:misguided but well-intentioned
362:Sure, thanks for the message.
1:
1053:to file an un-delete request.
1024:our policy for non-free media
789:dispute resolution guidelines
378:Goguryeo language recent edit
132:criteria for non-free content
83:15:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
47:02:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
967:criteria for speedy deletion
770:; others might view them as
603:In the Explosion section of
1045:If you receive this notice
1007:File:FreeRepublicTeaBag.jpg
943:File:FreeRepublicTeaBag.jpg
782:for the general policy and
663:, who declined the request.
444:, who declined the request.
127:File:FreeRepublicTeaBag.jpg
23:Category:American criminals
1101:
923:20:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
895:19:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
880:19:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
851:19:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
805:20:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
749:19:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
646:19:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
630:19:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
599:19:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
557:18:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
428:17:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
372:20:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
357:20:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
180:22:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
155:19:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
136:the image description page
115:18:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
954:and edit it to include a
952:the file description page
816:guide to appealing blocks
567:guide to appealing blocks
338:11:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
307:09:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
288:09:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
267:08:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
252:07:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
233:07:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
208:07:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
1086:06:01, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
905:recommend that you read
890:
744:
641:
594:
367:
333:
302:
262:
228:
1067:and leave a message on
983:10:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
999:
937:
656:
437:
55:don't bite the newbies
1058:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
1004:Thanks for uploading
997:
936:
708:change block settings
655:
489:change block settings
436:
124:Thanks for uploading
1069:my owner's talk page
784:WP:Three revert rule
223:give any comments.
17:Welcome, and comment
1020:You may add it back
1060:to your talk page.
1000:
956:fair use rationale
938:
887:JustGettingItRight
741:JustGettingItRight
672:JustGettingItRight
657:
638:JustGettingItRight
591:JustGettingItRight
453:JustGettingItRight
438:
364:JustGettingItRight
330:JustGettingItRight
299:JustGettingItRight
259:JustGettingItRight
225:JustGettingItRight
1012:claim of fair use
919:
915:
847:
843:
801:
797:
404:
390:comment added by
39:Sarcasticidealist
1092:
1059:
1002:
963:my contributions
920:
917:
913:
877:
870:
863:
848:
845:
841:
829:
823:
802:
799:
795:
727:
725:
714:
696:
694:deleted contribs
654:
627:
620:
613:
580:
574:
554:
547:
540:
508:
506:
495:
477:
475:deleted contribs
435:
403:
384:
284:
279:
248:
243:
204:
199:
176:
171:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1057:
991:
990:
931:
911:
873:
866:
859:
839:
835:
827:
821:
820:, then use the
809:
793:
752:
715:
705:
691:
674:
667:blocking policy
652:
623:
616:
609:
605:Suicide methods
586:
578:
572:
571:, then use the
560:
550:
543:
536:
532:Suicide methods
521:
496:
486:
472:
455:
448:blocking policy
433:
410:
385:
380:
345:
325:
282:
277:
246:
241:
202:
197:
184:You commented:
174:
169:
162:
122:
93:
35:on my talk page
19:
12:
11:
5:
1098:
1096:
1075:
1073:
1072:
1061:
1054:
1043:
1040:
989:
986:
930:
927:
926:
925:
899:
898:
897:
810:
808:
807:
759:
755:Decline reason
736:
732:Request reason
729:
650:
649:
648:
561:
528:
524:Decline reason
517:
513:Request reason
510:
431:
409:
406:
379:
376:
375:
374:
344:
341:
324:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
192:
191:
161:
158:
121:
118:
92:
87:
86:
85:
69:
68:
59:
58:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1097:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1055:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1001:
996:
987:
985:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
959:
957:
953:
949:
945:
944:
935:
928:
924:
921:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
883:
882:
881:
878:
876:
871:
869:
864:
862:
855:
854:
853:
852:
849:
834:
833:
826:
819:
817:
806:
803:
790:
785:
781:
777:
776:
775:
773:
769:
765:
758:
756:
751:
750:
746:
742:
735:
733:
728:
723:
719:
713:
709:
704:
700:
695:
690:
686:
685:global blocks
682:
681:active blocks
678:
673:
668:
664:
662:
661:administrator
647:
643:
639:
634:
633:
632:
631:
628:
626:
621:
619:
614:
612:
606:
601:
600:
596:
592:
585:
584:
577:
570:
568:
559:
558:
555:
553:
548:
546:
541:
539:
533:
527:
525:
520:
516:
514:
509:
504:
500:
494:
490:
485:
481:
476:
471:
467:
466:global blocks
463:
462:active blocks
459:
454:
449:
445:
443:
442:administrator
430:
429:
426:
423:
419:
415:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
342:
340:
339:
335:
331:
322:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
286:
285:
280:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
250:
249:
244:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
221:
217:
212:
211:
210:
209:
206:
205:
200:
190:
187:
186:
185:
182:
181:
178:
177:
172:
166:
159:
157:
156:
152:
148:
143:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:
119:
117:
116:
113:
112:Mailer Diablo
108:
106:
102:
98:
91:
88:
84:
80:
76:
71:
70:
66:
61:
60:
56:
51:
50:
49:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
16:
1076:Thank you.
1074:
1046:
1030:PLEASE NOTE:
1029:
1028:
1005:
1003:
992:
960:
941:
939:
902:
874:
867:
860:
836:
831:
813:
811:
760:
754:
753:
737:
731:
730:
703:creation log
670:
658:
624:
617:
610:
602:
587:
582:
564:
562:
551:
544:
537:
529:
523:
522:
518:
512:
511:
484:creation log
451:
439:
411:
392:KoreanSentry
381:
346:
326:
275:
239:
219:
215:
195:
193:
188:
183:
167:
163:
144:
125:
123:
109:
94:
20:
780:WP:Edit war
386:—Preceding
278:Will Beback
242:Will Beback
198:Will Beback
170:Will Beback
75:David in DC
791:instead.
764:disruption
699:filter log
480:filter log
349:Beerfinger
814:read the
718:checkuser
677:block log
565:read the
499:checkuser
458:block log
422:Fut.Perf.
1016:orphaned
948:fair use
914:HEFFIELD
903:strongly
842:HEFFIELD
796:HEFFIELD
689:contribs
470:contribs
400:contribs
388:unsigned
160:Question
1078:DASHBot
1035:I am a
975:Cptnono
875:Shalott
825:unblock
712:unblock
625:Shalott
576:unblock
552:Shalott
493:unblock
408:Blocked
295:WP:BLP
147:STBotI
1047:after
818:first
766:than
569:first
1082:talk
1065:here
1051:here
979:talk
918:TEEL
907:this
891:talk
861:Lady
846:TEEL
800:TEEL
745:talk
642:talk
611:Lady
595:talk
538:Lady
418:here
416:and
414:here
396:talk
368:talk
353:talk
334:talk
303:talk
283:talk
263:talk
247:talk
229:talk
220:just
214:the
203:talk
175:talk
151:talk
97:here
79:talk
43:talk
31:here
27:here
1037:bot
1026:).
722:log
669:).
503:log
450:).
216:and
1084:)
981:)
958:.
901:I
893:)
868:of
828:}}
822:{{
774:.
757::
747:)
734::
716:•
710:•
706:•
701:•
697:•
692:•
687:•
683:•
679:•
644:)
618:of
597:)
579:}}
573:{{
545:of
526::
515::
497:•
491:•
487:•
482:•
478:•
473:•
468:•
464:•
460:•
420:.
402:)
398:•
370:)
355:)
336:)
305:)
265:)
231:)
153:)
142:.
107:.
81:)
45:)
1080:(
1071:.
998:⚠
977:(
916:S
912:S
889:(
844:S
840:S
798:S
794:S
743:(
726:)
724:)
720:(
675:(
640:(
593:(
507:)
505:)
501:(
456:(
425:☼
394:(
366:(
351:(
332:(
301:(
261:(
227:(
149:(
77:(
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.