258:
ko divert krta raha. Mea bola tha na tery ko, ki teri maa ko nanga kr k chodunga, ab dekh na wada pura kiya na mea nay ? Ab zra soch k tu jitna tang hua us say zyada Hum
Kashmiri 69 years say tum india say tng haen. Sharm kro na khud poverty mitatay ho na apnay 600 million without wash room people ki or na Pak afghan central asia china k progress krnay detay ho. zid bna kr bethay ho or trillions gora hrami say weapons pr zaya kr rhay ho. Khud ko genious smjtay ho or ek number k bewqoof ho. DHANEVAD
23:
54:
185:
257:
2 saal say tery ko kuta bna diya mea nay, tu hr wqt hr jga kutay ki tra mujy dhudta hay. Itna time zaya kr k Sp I file krta hay. Itni mehnat mza aa gya. tu mera paltu kuta hay or mera time pass hay, Mery peechay BSO page pr aya or ab Kargil aya pta nhi kidr kidr ghumaya tujy mea nay . teri attention
227:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a
119:
You have not been threatened. You have been warned. That is not the same thing. You can't continue to use
Knowledge as your own personal soapbox. Adding references to bad content does not make it good.
89:
208:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
223:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the
88:
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at
Knowledge's
35:
140:
You are very welcome to call an admin to look into this if you really want to. I don't recommend it. There is such thing as a
27:
144:
which might come back on you but if you are sure that you have done nothing wrong then please feel free to give it a try. --
82:
78:
58:
228:
220:
97:
73:
with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek
205:
200:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge this is known as "
70:
224:
201:
189:
115:
What
Disruption. I have added what ten sources are saying. I will go to admin if you threatened me again.
149:
125:
105:
43:
209:
172:
141:
74:
175:. Then I will contest my edit with any other neutral admin who will play a judge between us.
236:
145:
121:
101:
39:
166:
153:
252:
193:
163:
62:
22:
219:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose
232:
213:
184:
240:
129:
109:
47:
38:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
197:
136:
Re: your threat to call an admin if you don't get your own way
31:
158:
And, FYI, at least one of the people removing the material
77:with them. Alternatively you can read Knowledge's
96:If you continue to disrupt Knowledge, you may be
81:page, and ask for independent help at one of the
8:
204:" and is usually seen as obstructing the
26:Please do not add commentary or your own
90:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
30:to Knowledge articles, as you did to
7:
171:Then I will be calm and wait as per
14:
69:If you are engaged in an article
196:other editors' contributions at
183:
135:
52:
34:. Doing so violates Knowledge's
21:
192:. You appear to be repeatedly
1:
36:neutral point of view policy
241:12:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
167:12:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
154:12:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
130:12:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
110:12:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
48:11:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
272:
229:loss of editing privileges
59:making disruptive edits
206:normal editing process
83:relevant notice boards
194:reverting or undoing
190:welcome to Knowledge
98:blocked from editing
221:editing privileges
79:dispute resolution
225:three-revert rule
28:personal analysis
263:
256:
187:
61:, as you did at
56:
55:
25:
271:
270:
266:
265:
264:
262:
261:
260:
250:
248:
181:
138:
71:content dispute
53:
19:
12:
11:
5:
269:
267:
247:
244:
180:
177:
137:
134:
133:
132:
114:
94:
93:
86:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
268:
259:
254:
245:
243:
242:
238:
234:
231:. Thank you.
230:
226:
222:
217:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
186:
178:
176:
174:
169:
168:
165:
164:Dirk Beetstra
162:an admin. --
161:
156:
155:
151:
147:
143:
131:
127:
123:
118:
117:
116:
112:
111:
107:
103:
99:
91:
87:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
66:
64:
60:
50:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
24:
16:
249:
218:
202:edit warring
182:
173:WP:Boomerang
170:
159:
157:
142:WP:Boomerang
139:
113:
95:
63:Leh district
57:Please stop
51:
20:
188:Hello, and
179:August 2016
146:DanielRigal
122:DanielRigal
102:DanielRigal
40:DanielRigal
17:August 2016
253:Kautilya3
246:Kautilya3
214:talk page
210:consensus
75:consensus
212:on the
233:331dot
198:Kargil
237:talk
150:talk
126:talk
106:talk
44:talk
100:.
32:Leh
239:)
216:.
160:is
152:)
128:)
120:--
108:)
65:.
46:)
255::
251:@
235:(
148:(
124:(
104:(
92:.
85:.
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
