User talk:Lexicon/Archive eta

180:. Perhaps it is enough for the article in English wikipedia, but actually it is not mentioned in the article. Legends can not be the reason for qualifying what article has right to be in wikipedia. Tsar Oak was bigger and higher, and more majestic, but it was never described by writers, because it was located 15 km from Białowieża, and not easy accessible (swamps). In any case it is not area of my interest. I know this area ver well, I was born there, but it is enough for now. 645: 1503: 1400: 1179: 1017: 914: 747: 274: 213: 539:. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Knowledge (XXG), but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Knowledge (XXG), in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- 1339: 1280: 1118: 823: 583:

I looked at the article in google cache and it seemed to be either genuine, or a very well developed hoax. Can you restore the article in my userspace (along with its edit history) so that I can verify if any of its current of past content are verifiable, and hence worth retaining ? I should be able

617:

It didn't take that long. The article is certainly a hoax. I searched for spelling variations, but didn't find a single news or web item about the subject, which is very surprising for a person supposed to be the vice-president of Bihar state BJP. Also all the citations in the article are unrelated

152:

almost two years ago. Further, the comment by someone about the name was that an article on the tree you added shouldn't be named "Dąb Car" because since it's in Belarus (and presumably not in the forest that straddles the border with Poland), it's not called "Dąb Car", only "Царь-дуб" (and should

171:

was did not merged, though it was never the highest oak in Białowieża Forest, and it has not historical meanning as was said before of merging of this oak. There is only one difference, the article about Jagiełło Oak has a legend (not historical true, it is too joung). The other oaks also have

1149:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1370:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1311:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 849: 128:

Did I make a mistake? It is also popular name for every higher oak, used also in belarussian literature. The same name has the highest oak of Belarus. Of course the article is not finished and should be expanded. I will think about it.

1366:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1307:

1145:

148:

is because it was decided that the Tsar Oak which is the main tree described (to which you have added a bit about a different "Tsar Oak") isn't notable enough for an article. That decision was made

167:

Yes it is no problem, It is Polish oak - Ghirlandajo made a mistake - I saw it many times, and photographed too, but in Belarus is the other oak with the same name. It is only surprised for me that

81: 837:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1541:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 785:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 245:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 306:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 848:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

241:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1537:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

781:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

302:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

176:(only 1.5 km) and was well known for the tourists and writers. Some of these writers described this oak (one these writers received Nobel Prise, not for oak, but for 1530: