345:. Assuming your memory isn't faulty, I wonder why you would opt to post this on my talk page? It goes without saying that this must have been done in good faith, of course, and that this isn't in fact a none-too-cleverly veiled threat intended to intimidate me and discourage my participation. Surely no admin who values his position would do such an irresponsible thing. Indeed, you
654:
place the events of that episode between June and
September, and make no mention of the "president-elect" issue, so it could be interesting to throw that into the mix. But it probably won't pass muster as a reference source for the SoD article, since it's all speculation, and using other WP articles as references is frowned upon anyway, but it could be interesting. Later. --
805:
rather, troublesome users will start being blocked, leaving those who aren't forcing page protection to be able to edit articles in peace. If you continue making the sort of edits you've made tonight, which are frankly hostile, combative and disruptive, you're going to end up blocked or topic banned from anything to do with Doctor Who. Please just stop.
1255:
Block lifted, but if you do end up blocked again in future (which I sincerely hope you won't be), do not try to circumvent the block by logging out of your account and trying to edit with your IP address, this is how you managed to trigger the autoblock on your IP address (and which in turn prevented
743:
I take matters like that very seriously. If you'd care to check my edit history, you may see that I'm no stranger to articles that attract debate. It seemed necessary to inform you of policy in order to prevent you from making a very serious misstep. As to your other request, I will try to avoid
653:
Mael-Num - It seems that we're outnumbered on this issue, and can't make edits on the article... but it might be more productive and/or appropriate to discuss that at the "Chronology of the Doctor Who universe" page's talk page - a page which I didn't know existed until earlier today. They actually
1048:
Fair enough, I'm not the guy to hold a grudge. You should however be careful when reopening matters on that page -- when an admin closes a matter and you're reopening it (especially when it's a matter you yourself have opened) you really have to double-check your reasons, or you might end up being
354:
Howevever, Jossi, now that I have made you aware of this possible alternate interpretation of such actions, I will encourage you to refrain from posting such ambiguous (yet helpful!) reminders on my talk page ever again. After all, with so many eyes on this article in general, and your actions in
1312:
Hi. My admin powers don't grant me any extra weight in content disputes, but I am fairly sure that the articles as many unmerged entities will not survive articles for deletion. I think your plan of having several lists is a good one, so be bold and go ahead with it. I'll give you any help if you
851:
I didn't edit war, no one has even accused me of such. That cited argument uses strong language, but did you read what I was responding to? "Everything" I've done isn't disruptive. I'll own up to making a mistake in reopening a case, but even the
Mediation Cabal rep eventually agreed that some
804:
Consensus appears to be firmly against you on
President-Elect issue, and the endless threads at WP:AN are becoming disruptive. You've got a few days to decide how you're going to behave once the page protection lapses on The Sound of Drums, but I can assure you, the page will not be re-protected,
1009:
Actually, you're right, no one had responded yet; I misread, and thought Steve's comment below yours was a response. I'm not sure now what the complaint is about for that particular diff; it seems to me a wise de-escalation in wording. In any case, I've not got the time to get involved in the
258:
I can't say I blame
Momento for making that assumption, I'd have probably done the same thing given our similar styles. Of course, I probably wouldn't have made an issue of it at an RfA with no proof and no concurrent edits being made from our two accounts...but I can't really speak as to his
493:
I left a comment on your page. Basically, you're tag-teaming with another editor to delete whatever you don't want in the article. We got through the first two stages (Bold/Revert) and now we're up to "discuss". I'm well aware of policy...you're either willfully ignoring it, or just aren't
887:
To clarify, I discussed this on IRC with a few admins, one thought the post had some issues that may need addressing, the other one thought otherwise. My opinion stayed the same, I thought it should have been closed, and retracted my withdraw when i saw it had been closed before I posted it.
713:
I've replied to your crap on my talkpage and on the article talkpage. Read statements before you reply to them, and then kindly desist from scoring minor debating points. Stick to the issue at hand, which is original research, not good faith, bad faith, bananas on toast or anything else.
211:. Under the sub-heading "Sock puppeteer?". Presumably because we share the same first 4 letters, and I bet he doesn't know what the word means. Anyways, is there even a point in your opinion, to pointing out over there that you have no idea who the heck I am, or vice versa? (: --
965:
sort of considered poor form to alter your own writing significantly after someone else has responded to it; it makes it look like they are responding to something different than what they were really responding to. The best thing to do in that case is use
55:
994:
I don't think someone had yet responded to me. Otherwise, I wouldn't have "gentled down" my language. What would be the point? But thanks for taking the time to reply to me here. I'll make sure I'm more attentive (and "gentle") in the future.
1357:
Yes I am, but unfortunately this morning I woke up with a fever and a pretty nasty headache. I've been in and out to check email and make a couple of minor edits, but I've been very much about the bed rest today. I'll try to catch up asap.
1049:
accused of abuse. Just to be clear on that, I'm not accusing you of anything, it's obvious it was just a misunderstanding -- but some people are more sensitive than others, and you might end up stepping on the wrong person's toes. :-) --
978:
or something to add new text, or at least add a note to the end of the paragraph indicating you changed the text after someone responded. Obviously it's OK to change your own prose, you just want to make clear to others that you did so.
94:
775:
Okay, I see. I asked that the AN thread be closed, this isn't an issue an administrator really needs to intervene, it's a content dispute that needs a neutral party to look over. I'll see what I can do, of course, being neutral.
441:
I undid my addition already (as I mentioned), just in case. I wouldn't want to rely on its obscure location as protection against copyright violation, and I especially wouldn't want you getting any static for my screwup.
866:
I don't appreciate being treatened, being told that I should stop editing articles "or else". I don't appreciate false accusations. I welcome advise from my peers, but this isn't helpful. You're not being fair.
355:
particular, I'd hate to see your adminship jeopardized due to the perception, misguided though it may be, that you are a bully. After all, no one likes a bully, and I'd rather we all got along and worked together.
744:
using your talk page in the future, per your preference, but I am entitled to edit wherever it is necessary. You are welcome to archive or remove my comments in their entirety, if you'd like, after I make them.
1167:
I find they can be rather humiliating for the user in question, and I would rather you discussed proposed changes in your behaviour that will see you unblocked, rather than discussing a block template.
297:
1339:
313:. Any editor may be banned from any or all of the articles, or other reasonably related pages, by an uninvolved administrator for disruptive edits, including, but not limited to,
1138:
and countless other diffs, all of which are designed to inflame the situation. They are excessively combatitive and do nothing to help solve the problems with the article.
188:, describes your block and unblock, the Memento sockpuppetry accusation and cites a Talk page comment directed to you and someone else as an example of a threat by Jossi.
360:
I'm going to take the liberty of copy-pasting this over to your talk page. I hope you'll find my insights helpful, and I wouldn't want you to overlook them.
669:
Hey...thanks for stopping by to point that out. I'll mention it over on that page. You're a good fellow, and I'm pleased to have met you. Keep in touch.
1313:
need it with deleting, protecting, and so on. You also might want to take advantage of a number of pictures I uploaded which were deleted as orphans -- see
820:
How have I been "disruptive"? I'm not even sure I've made edits to any articles tonight, only talk and special pages. What's up with this coercive talk?
555:
Can I point out that being incivil, dismissive of others' arguments, using phrases such as "yadda, yadda, yadda" and accusing people of being megalomaniacs
509:
I've replied to your rather rude message on the article talk-page. Let's keep all further discussion to there, not on either my or this talkpage. Thanks.
1213:
Okay, so I don't know what's up with that template. Please lift my block anyway? I already have it lifted from my name, I just need the IP's undone.
694:
269:
1231:
It looks like Nick removed the autoblock. If you're still unable to edit, please be sure to post the entire block of text from the page you see.
349:
have meant this post as a helpful reminder, and completely overlooked the possible chilling effects that such a post may have on future discussion.
422:
Don't worry about it too much. An academic paper copied into a subpage of a user isn't likely to cause a strong reaction from a copyright holder.
462:
Hi; I left a message at the talkpage. Note that simple reversion is not considered edit-warring, and I won't be reverting my edit. The policy is
683:
I'm getting a bit ganged up on over at the Sound of Drums talk page... could use some help if you have time and still agree with me :) Thanks
402:
Sorry Steve, but I'm not sure where you'd like me to comment. Anywhere? Everywhere? I don't want to hold things up any more than I have...
392:
185:
that your experiences on the Prem Rawat page are being discussed in an
Arbitration Committee proceeding. I know that my evidence section at
600:
Being incivil, dismissive of others' arguments, using phrases such as "yadda, yadda, yadda" and accusing people of being megalomaniacs
384:
regarding this case, and please either accept or rejcet the idea. You're also the last one who needs to comment, then we can move on.
1342:
1099:
728:
573:
523:
480:
423:
306:
1235:
941:
900:
788:
1010:
actual conflict, so hopefully Steve
Crossin can sort things out for you folks; I was just handing out free drive-by advice. --
233:
you're not me?", I'm starting to wonder, made me laugh, and you're almost too intelligent/common sensical in your viewpoint,
318:
691:
659:
170:
34:
310:
208:
186:
144:
Just a quick 'heads-up' to let you know that the 'Wiki-bias' you battled with last year has led to a new development:
69:
Awarded to a user who learns and improves from criticism and never lets mistakes or blunders impede their growth as
837:
are disruptive, re-opening threads at WP:AN is disruptive, edit warring and forcing page protection is disruptive.
753:
I also wouldn't waste administrative energies on this if I were you. You'd likely find it counterproductive.
1314:
1082:
936:
895:
783:
686:
655:
389:
155:
Perhaps there's hope for
Knowledge's credibility yet? (there will be if enough whistle-blowers pucker up!)
1348:
1203:
1093:
722:
567:
517:
474:
429:
70:
633:
246:
220:
158:
610:
And next time, sign your name. If you're going to try to be funny, at least take credit for it.
1324:
931:
890:
778:
386:
322:
314:
147:
1015:
984:
852:
more attention might need to be paid to this case, and retracted his request to see it closed.
438:
Worry's too ingrained in my nature, but thanks for the reassurance and for the quick response.
1345:
1089:
718:
563:
513:
470:
426:
166:
1377:
1232:
625:
332:
238:
212:
193:
117:
77:
207:
Momento, in his evidence regarding the Prem Rawat affair, has suggested we are "related"
342:
Yes, of course. You know that I know this is the policy. We discussed it earlier today
1261:
1173:
1143:
842:
810:
1387:
1359:
1319:
1289:
1271:
1214:
1183:
1154:
1113:
1062:
1025:
996:
914:
868:
821:
754:
670:
611:
587:
539:
495:
463:
443:
403:
361:
278:
113:
863:
when you're drunk). It's not an excuse, but I think it helps to explain my actions.
1011:
980:
54:
298:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Prem_Rawat/Proposed_decision#Article_probation
162:
1373:
1050:
328:
302:
189:
73:
1257:
1169:
1139:
838:
806:
121:
109:
93:
464:
Bold (a change to the page, what you did), Revert (what I did), Discuss
1395:
1381:
1367:
1351:
1328:
1297:
1279:
1265:
1242:
1222:
1191:
1177:
1162:
1147:
1121:
1106:
1070:
1055:
1033:
1019:
1004:
988:
947:
922:
906:
876:
846:
829:
814:
794:
762:
735:
700:
678:
663:
636:
619:
595:
580:
547:
530:
503:
487:
451:
432:
411:
396:
369:
336:
286:
249:
223:
197:
174:
124:
81:
1024:
Much obliged all the same. Come again anytime, I'll make coffee. =)
1284:(I don't even remember my own password unless I check my email...I
604:
isn't constructive, and isn't likely to lead to useful discussion.
559:
isn't constructive, and isn't likely to lead to useful discussion.
538:
Yes. "Rude". Seems to be a bit of that going around these days...
381:
1338:
Are you still planning to work on that? A question's come up at
913:
Thanks, Steve. By the way...I'm me over at IRC. Who are you?
148:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/06/the_cult_of_wikipedia/
15:
1270:
I did no such thing. I never logged out, to my knowledge.
859:
closed despite the retraction, he retracted...try saying
1153:
Aren't you supposed to put some sort of template here?
1136:
1133:
853:
835:
343:
1340:
User talk:Steve
Crossin/Mediation/Prem Rawat/Proposal2
385:
834:
Everything you're doing is disruptive, comments like
1256:
you from using your account once it was unblocked).
120:
in the face of
Knowledge chaos. Thank you. Yours,
624:Quit making me snort coffee out my nose! :) --
309:, including their talk pages, are subject to
8:
1372:Take it easy, and drink plenty of fluids.
1112:I have added a new section there as well.
1103:
1096:
1086:
732:
725:
715:
684:
649:Doctor Who & Timelines: Sound of Drums
577:
570:
560:
527:
520:
510:
484:
477:
467:
137:Enough was enough - but that was then ...
91:
52:
970:to "take back" something you said, and
929:(stares). SteveCrossin . I'm on now.
7:
1132:This has gone on quite long enough.
116:for your most admirable attempts at
380:Could you please have a look at my
1386:Thanks. Doing much better today.
14:
237:to be me! lol! Happy editing! --
954:Your most recent question at ANI
92:
53:
1061:Understood, and thanks again.
1:
607:I hope that helped...someone.
175:14:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
466:. Not Bold Discuss. Thanks.
296:Just to inform you that per
203:Is it even worth mentioning?
1414:
198:05:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
125:03:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
1396:17:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
1382:03:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
1368:02:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
1352:01:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
1329:22:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1182:What would you propose?
224:07:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
112:, award this barnstar to
98:
82:18:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
59:
1391:
1363:
1298:18:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1293:
1280:18:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1275:
1266:17:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1243:17:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1223:17:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1218:
1192:17:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1187:
1178:17:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1163:17:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1158:
1148:16:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1122:16:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1117:
1107:16:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1071:22:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1066:
1056:22:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1034:22:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1029:
1020:22:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1005:22:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1000:
989:22:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
948:23:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
923:23:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
918:
907:22:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
877:22:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
872:
847:22:40, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
830:22:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
825:
815:22:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
795:20:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
763:19:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
758:
736:19:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
701:06:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
679:02:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
674:
664:02:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
637:00:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
620:20:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
615:
596:20:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
591:
581:20:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
548:19:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
543:
531:19:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
504:19:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
499:
488:18:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
452:18:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
447:
433:18:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
412:04:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
407:
397:15:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
370:07:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
365:
337:05:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
292:Article probation notice
287:17:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
282:
259:thought process on that.
250:15:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
1315:User:Andrevan/Archive42
1083:Talk:The Sound of Drums
1081:I've replied to you at
118:civility and politeness
152:gives the gist of it.
63:The Resilient Barnstar
771:Reply to my talk page
181:You Ought To Know ...
1044:Re:admin noticeboard
494:terribly observant.
656:Shubopshadangalang
1380:
1054:
977:
855:(which, after it
635:
335:
311:article probation
248:
222:
177:
161:comment added by
131:
130:
87:
86:
80:
45:
44:
1405:
1376:
1240:
1207:
1105:
1098:
1088:
1053:
975:
946:
944:
939:
934:
905:
903:
898:
893:
793:
791:
786:
781:
734:
727:
717:
699:
632:
629:
579:
572:
562:
529:
522:
512:
486:
479:
469:
395:
331:
319:personal attacks
307:related articles
245:
242:
219:
216:
156:
102:The Purple Heart
96:
89:
88:
76:
57:
50:
49:
16:
1413:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1336:
1310:
1236:
1201:
1130:
1079:
1046:
956:
942:
937:
932:
930:
901:
896:
891:
889:
802:
789:
784:
779:
777:
773:
711:
651:
627:
586:Yes, you can.
460:
420:
378:
294:
240:
214:
205:
183:
139:
23:
12:
11:
5:
1411:
1409:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1370:
1335:
1334:More DuPertuis
1332:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1282:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1226:
1225:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
955:
952:
951:
950:
926:
925:
910:
909:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
864:
801:
798:
772:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
748:
747:
746:
745:
710:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
608:
553:
552:
551:
550:
507:
506:
459:
458:"Edit-warring"
456:
455:
454:
439:
419:
416:
415:
414:
377:
374:
373:
372:
357:
356:
351:
350:
293:
290:
276:
275:
274:
273:
263:
262:
261:
260:
253:
252:
204:
201:
182:
179:
138:
135:
133:
129:
128:
105:
104:
99:
97:
85:
84:
66:
65:
60:
58:
47:
43:
42:
41:
40:
29:
28:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1410:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1344:
1341:
1333:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1316:
1307:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1244:
1241:
1239:
1234:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1205:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1101:
1095:
1091:
1084:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1052:
1043:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1002:
998:
993:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
973:
969:
964:
961:Actually, it
959:
958:Hi Mael-Num,
953:
949:
945:
940:
935:
933:Steve Crossin
928:
927:
924:
920:
916:
912:
911:
908:
904:
899:
894:
892:Steve Crossin
886:
885:
878:
874:
870:
865:
862:
858:
854:
850:
849:
848:
844:
840:
836:
833:
832:
831:
827:
823:
819:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
799:
797:
796:
792:
787:
782:
780:Steve Crossin
770:
764:
760:
756:
752:
751:
750:
749:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
730:
724:
720:
708:
702:
698:
697:
693:
690:
689:
682:
681:
680:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
665:
661:
657:
648:
638:
634:
631:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
605:
603:
599:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:
583:
582:
575:
569:
565:
558:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
525:
519:
515:
505:
501:
497:
492:
491:
490:
489:
482:
476:
472:
465:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
437:
436:
435:
434:
431:
428:
425:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
391:
388:
387:Steve Crossin
383:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
353:
352:
348:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
291:
289:
288:
284:
280:
271:
267:
266:
265:
264:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
244:
236:
232:
229:re: "are you
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
218:
210:
202:
200:
199:
195:
191:
187:
180:
178:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
153:
150:
149:
145:
142:
136:
134:
126:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
106:
103:
100:
95:
90:
83:
79:
75:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
56:
51:
48:
39:
36:
33:
32:
31:
30:
27:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1337:
1318:
1311:
1285:
1237:
1204:unblock-auto
1200:
1131:
1080:
1047:
971:
967:
962:
960:
957:
860:
856:
803:
774:
712:
695:
687:
652:
601:
556:
554:
508:
461:
421:
379:
346:
327:
315:edit warring
301:
295:
277:
234:
230:
206:
184:
154:
151:
146:
143:
140:
132:
101:
62:
46:
37:
20:
1346:Will Beback
1090:TreasuryTag
976:small print
719:TreasuryTag
564:TreasuryTag
514:TreasuryTag
471:TreasuryTag
427:Will Beback
157:—Preceding
1288:log out.)
968:strikethru
692:"Shadang"
376:Prem Rawat
323:incivility
303:Prem Rawat
71:Wikpedians
38:Thru 12/07
1374:≈ jossi ≈
1308:SC2 pages
418:DuPertuis
329:≈ jossi ≈
74:≈ jossi ≈
35:Archive 1
1388:Mael-Num
1360:Mael-Num
1290:Mael-Num
1272:Mael-Num
1215:Mael-Num
1184:Mael-Num
1155:Mael-Num
1114:Mael-Num
1100:contribs
1063:Mael-Num
1026:Mael-Num
997:Mael-Num
915:Mael-Num
869:Mael-Num
822:Mael-Num
755:Mael-Num
729:contribs
671:Mael-Num
612:Mael-Num
588:Mael-Num
574:contribs
540:Mael-Num
524:contribs
496:Mael-Num
481:contribs
444:Mael-Num
404:Mael-Num
393:(review)
362:Mael-Num
279:Mael-Num
171:contribs
159:unsigned
114:Mael-Num
21:Archives
1128:Blocked
1012:barneca
981:barneca
972:italics
943:(email)
902:(email)
800:Request
790:(email)
382:request
1378:(talk)
938:(talk)
897:(talk)
785:(talk)
688:Shübop
602:really
557:really
390:(talk)
333:(talk)
270:I lied
268:Okay,
163:Revera
78:(talk)
1320:Andre
1286:never
1238:juice
1233:Mango
1077:Reply
1051:Gutza
696:Âlang
630:fique
243:fique
217:fique
190:Msalt
1392:talk
1364:talk
1343:·:·
1325:talk
1294:talk
1276:talk
1262:talk
1258:Nick
1219:talk
1188:talk
1174:talk
1170:Nick
1159:talk
1144:talk
1140:Nick
1118:talk
1094:talk
1067:talk
1030:talk
1016:talk
1001:talk
985:talk
919:talk
873:talk
861:that
843:talk
839:Nick
826:talk
811:talk
807:Nick
759:talk
723:talk
675:talk
660:talk
626:Mael
616:talk
592:talk
568:talk
544:talk
518:talk
500:talk
475:talk
448:talk
424:·:·
408:talk
366:talk
347:must
321:and
305:and
283:talk
272:. ;)
239:Mael
231:sure
213:Mael
209:here
194:talk
167:talk
141:Hi!
122:Smee
110:Smee
1349:·:·
974:or
857:was
709:You
430:·:·
325:.
235:not
108:I,
1394:)
1366:)
1327:)
1317:.
1296:)
1278:)
1264:)
1221:)
1206:}}
1202:{{
1190:)
1176:)
1161:)
1146:)
1135:,
1120:)
1104:─╢
1087:╟─
1085:.
1069:)
1032:)
1018:)
1003:)
987:)
979:--
963:is
921:)
875:)
845:)
828:)
813:)
761:)
733:─╢
716:╟─
677:)
662:)
618:)
594:)
578:─╢
561:╟─
546:)
528:─╢
511:╟─
502:)
485:─╢
468:╟─
450:)
410:)
368:)
317:,
285:)
196:)
173:)
169:•
127:.
1390:(
1362:(
1323:(
1292:(
1274:(
1260:(
1217:(
1186:(
1172:(
1157:(
1142:(
1116:(
1102:)
1097:╬
1092:(
1065:(
1028:(
1014:(
999:(
983:(
917:(
871:(
841:(
824:(
809:(
757:(
731:)
726:╬
721:(
685:—
673:(
658:(
628:e
614:(
590:(
576:)
571:╬
566:(
542:(
526:)
521:╬
516:(
498:(
483:)
478:╬
473:(
446:(
406:(
364:(
281:(
241:e
215:e
192:(
165:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
