637:
the platoon was attending some training lecture or film, the instructor would take the platoon's worst shot to the rifle range and show him how to zero his rifle. He found most combat troops were issued rifles when they reported to
Vietnam rather than traveling with the rifles they had used in training. Few of them had zeroed the newly issued rifles they used in combat. When the remainder of the platoon finished their alternative training session, they rejoined Gomer at the rifle range where they were to empty one magazine at a man sized silhouette. I'm uncertain of the distance, but my recollection is 100 yards. Gomer was required to shoot with the semi-automatic setting from a prone position, while each of the other soldiers was instructed to use whatever position and setting they felt was most effective. Most chose to fire fully automatic from a standing position. The instructor reported the result was almost always the same: Gomer had more hits on target than the
621:. While I share your concern about misunderstandings created by selective use of half-truths, my opinions will be perceived as synthesis or original research in the absence of source citations which will be time consuming to locate; and answering here may avoid a flurry of objections on that basis. I assume you are already aware of the following comments, so I don't mean to be pedantic. I offer them only in the hope my thoughts may inspire your creation of alternative language to convey the information to an audience with differing preconceptions.
756:
701:
286:
633:
I understand the increased random probability of hits with multiple bullets, I have found individually aimed shots more effective for hand-held weapons. Unfortunately, hitting the target isn't part of our definition of effective rate of fire; and differing target scenarios have prevented development of widely accepted means of comparing how many bullets can be put on target per unit of time.
452:
218:
636:
An Army marksmanship instructor had a revealing experience in
Vietnam where he provided refresher training to platoons with combat experience. He would begin by asking the platoon to identify their worst shot; and they would typically identify someone reminiscent of Gomer Pyle. While the remainder of
651:
is discouraging because the criminals obtained a much higher number of casualties per shot fired than the police did. The most dismaying part of that comparison is the probability of collateral damage from bullets missing their intended target. Since the police and criminals are often using the same
632:
Few people have first hand experience shooting, so most of them rely upon
Hollywood's portrayal of gunfights. Hollywood finds the sound of multiple gunshots more threatening than the single aimed sniper shot, so most audiences perceive that sound as more threatening than the single aimed shot. While
628:
Effective rate of fire is the only means of comparing fully automatic and semi-automatic firearms. The initial basis for variation is the ability of the shooter to rapidly reactivate the trigger; but the the most dramatic difference will be based on magazine capacity because changing magazines takes
646:
Although less than an hour of time taken for everyone to zero their rifles could theoretically have provided the same result, it took the shock value of being beaten by Gomer Pyle to shake off the underlying belief (of combat-experienced soldiers!!!) that full automatic fire was more effective than
418:
article is about controversial stuff, and I can understand passions run high around it; but nevertheless we need to keep discourse respectful on the talkpage — especially on controversial pages. There is no respect in suggesting another user is "worrying solely about protecting the image of HRC" as
672:
Thank you for the information on the cyclical rate of fire. It certainly makes sense that only an automatic could have a cyclical firing rate. Thank you also for the
Vietnam example, I have found it nearly impossible to explain to people terrified about automatics that accurate shooters are far
624:
Cyclic rate of fire applies only to fully automatic weapons; because semi-automatic weapons require non-mechanized trigger activation. The old
Gatling gun is a good basis of illustration. The hand cranked version was not originally defined as an automatic weapon, but the motorized versions are,
513:
though not exactly what I wished you to learn. Could you tell me what post/s by NorthBySouthBaranof and Sławomir Biały you're complaining about, please? If you have trouble producing diffs, you can just tell me the pages and the times and dates and I'll find them. (See however
346:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
487:
Thanks for the information! Either way, it is still incorrect. The style guide says that the ellipses should be used as following "The dog was walking...to the house." I believe there should not be space after the ellipses, or am I reading the style guide wrong?
772:
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
583:, which we actually have an article for. Also, you told them both their edits were "in bad faith", which would be a serious accusation, if you meant it. But probably you didn't, since you referred to the AGF guideline, which says we need to
652:
caliber weapons, there is some ambiguity about whose bullet caused the damage; but official police reports usually conclude they were fired by the criminals, and those reports of debatable neutrality are usually the only sources available.
260:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a
673:
more deadly. The larger point of my discussion on that page was to eliminate the nonsense about bump stocks making that tragedy possible. I look forward to writing with you in the future and hope you have a good holliday season!
801:
558:"I suggest that before jumping into controversial articles about political figures you hold strong personal opinions about, you take some time to review our policies and guidelines on content and sourcing, particularly."
564:
08:44, 3 October 2016 Perhaps I misread the policies but these seemed like valid instances. Thanks in advance for the help. I have not yet learned how to add diffs, but will be making an effort to do so.
312:
to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The
Committee's decision is
579:
Yes, I think you did misread the guideline, or at least overapply it. Those seem to me reasonable remarks in the context in which they were spoken, especially with SB's reference to the term
197:. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!
793:
786:
778:
774:
745:
737:
730:
722:
718:
313:
309:
717:
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
108:
464:
427:. You are not able to inspect the inside of their head, and remarks like that have a strong tendency to make the atmosphere on talkpages toxic. You may find the guideline
22:
533:"Please learn a little American political history. See Conservative Democrat. This is already an established concept, and there is no need to invent a new term for it"
455:
Welcome to
Knowledge, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
629:
significantly more time than trigger activation. The effective rate of fire will be similar for automatic and semi-automatic weapons using similarly sized magazines.
30:
241:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
104:
100:
162:, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered
112:
804:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
748:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
515:
256:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the
72:
327:
42:
419:
opposed to worrying about providing accurate information about her life. Don't talk about other users' opinions, let alone their
797:
741:
318:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
305:
174:
159:
93:
647:
individually aimed shots. We can hope our all-volunteer military training program takes advantage of that experience, but the
591:
are in good faith — that they're trying to help the encyclopedia and not mess it up. Saying 'your edit was in bad faith, see
335:
143:
62:
618:
428:
625:
because they have a uniformly measurable cyclic rate of fire for multiple shots activated by a single motor switch.
463:, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
459:
that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
782:
726:
648:
331:
57:
456:
343:
261:
253:
167:
534:
366:
Hi
NationalInterest16. Here are some guides you should read to help you when you post comments on a talk page.
617:
I have been caught up in holiday festivities and must apologize for my delay in responding to your question at
561:
339:
319:
238:
233:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge this is known as "
67:
33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Knowledge:
674:
566:
543:
489:
123:
655:
I sincerely hope both of us can put these frustrations aside for long enough to enjoy this holiday season.
825:
323:
257:
234:
222:
190:
119:
37:
580:
660:
292:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on
Knowledge. It does
86:
477:
242:
163:
600:
523:
436:
351:
269:
202:
194:
182:
52:
664:
809:
322:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
130:
762:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
707:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
380:
375:
246:
656:
415:
151:
468:
370:
226:
155:
755:
700:
285:
185:
is a good place to start learning about
Knowledge. If you have any questions, see the
596:
592:
519:
432:
424:
397:
347:
265:
198:
186:
828:
682:
603:
574:
551:
526:
497:
481:
460:
439:
400:
354:
273:
206:
47:
252:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose
230:
431:
helpful: "assuming good faith (AGF) is a fundamental principle on Knowledge."
508:
I see you learned something from my comment above about assuming good faith,
147:
26:
518:— if you're here for the long haul, you'll need to learn to create diffs.)
394:
451:
217:
389:
after your comments so that the footnotes don't float to the bottom.
89:– do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
173:
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Knowledge is
467:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
768:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
713:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
107:. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be
99:
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a
296:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
542:
was on the Bull Connor talk page. 12:09, 2 October 2016
79:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Knowledge
559:
539:
511:
509:
411:
135:
385:
If you add citations to a talk page, be sure to add a
595:' is kind of paradoxical. I hope this makes sense.
166:; doing so will result in your account or IP being
691:Discretionary Sanction Notification (re-upped)
334:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
105:Knowledge's Biography of Living Persons policy
8:
792:For additional information, please see the
777:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
736:For additional information, please see the
721:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
96:– this is one of Knowledge's core policies.
789:, when making edits related to the topic.
733:, when making edits related to the topic.
425:comment on content, not on the contributor
237:" and is usually seen as obstructing the
300:Please carefully read this information:
781:on editors who do not strictly follow
725:on editors who do not strictly follow
142:Do not add troublesome content to any
7:
516:Knowledge:Simple diff and link guide
794:guidance on discretionary sanctions
738:guidance on discretionary sanctions
129:If you are testing, please use the
695:Please be aware of the following:
14:
643:of the remainder of the platoon.
103:to any Knowledge page and follow
754:
699:
450:
284:
229:other editors' contributions at
216:
440:22:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
401:13:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
355:00:08, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
274:03:11, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
225:. You appear to be repeatedly
207:03:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
683:17:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
665:19:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
279:Discretionary sanctions alert
38:The five pillars of Knowledge
829:05:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
619:Talk:2017 Las Vegas shooting
63:How to write a great article
604:15:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
575:02:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
552:02:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
527:11:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
498:04:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
482:03:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
844:
787:page-specific restrictions
731:page-specific restrictions
649:2015 San Bernardino attack
262:loss of editing privileges
124:abuse of multiple accounts
73:Simplified Manual of Style
612:
43:Contributing to Knowledge
678:
570:
547:
493:
406:Please assume good faith
189:, add a question to the
798:Arbitration Committee's
775:discretionary sanctions
742:Arbitration Committee's
719:discretionary sanctions
414:isn't appropriate. The
310:discretionary sanctions
239:normal editing process
581:Conservative Democrat
410:Your first paragraph
328:standards of behavior
306:Arbitration Committee
94:neutral point of view
783:Knowledge's policies
727:Knowledge's policies
429:WP:Assume good faith
336:editing restrictions
324:purpose of Knowledge
227:reverting or undoing
223:welcome to Knowledge
168:blocked from editing
160:promotional messages
562:NorthBySouthBaranof
675:NationalInterest16
613:Season's Greetings
567:NationalInterest16
544:NationalInterest16
490:NationalInterest16
362:Talk page comments
254:editing privileges
183:Knowledge tutorial
87:Respect copyrights
68:Naming conventions
48:How to edit a page
31:your contributions
258:three-revert rule
835:
822:
819:
816:
813:
758:
703:
537:
474:
471:
454:
393:Happy editing!-
387:{{reflist talk}}
288:
220:
138:
113:reliable sources
58:Picture tutorial
53:Editing tutorial
29:. Thank you for
843:
842:
838:
837:
836:
834:
833:
832:
820:
817:
814:
811:
807:
806:
759:
751:
750:
704:
693:
615:
535:
506:
472:
469:
457:Manual of Style
448:
416:Hillary Clinton
408:
364:
359:
358:
308:has authorised
289:
281:
214:
134:
19:
12:
11:
5:
841:
839:
760:
753:
752:
705:
698:
697:
692:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
640:combined total
614:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
555:
554:
536:Sławomir Biały
505:
502:
501:
500:
447:
444:
407:
404:
391:
390:
383:
378:
373:
363:
360:
330:, or relevant
290:
283:
282:
280:
277:
213:
212:September 2016
210:
179:
178:
171:
140:
127:
116:
111:with multiple
97:
90:
83:
82:
80:
76:
75:
70:
65:
60:
55:
50:
45:
40:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
840:
831:
830:
827:
824:
823:
805:
803:
799:
795:
790:
788:
784:
780:
776:
770:
769:
767:
757:
749:
747:
743:
739:
734:
732:
728:
724:
720:
715:
714:
712:
702:
696:
690:
684:
680:
676:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
653:
650:
644:
642:
641:
634:
630:
626:
622:
620:
605:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
577:
576:
572:
568:
563:
560:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
532:
531:
530:
528:
525:
521:
517:
512:
510:
503:
499:
495:
491:
486:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
466:
462:
458:
453:
445:
443:
441:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
417:
413:
405:
403:
402:
399:
396:
388:
384:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
368:
367:
361:
356:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
315:
311:
307:
302:
301:
297:
295:
287:
278:
276:
275:
271:
267:
264:. Thank you.
263:
259:
255:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
211:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:or ask me on
192:
188:
184:
176:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
132:
128:
125:
121:
117:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:living person
98:
95:
91:
88:
85:
84:
81:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
35:
34:
32:
28:
24:
16:
810:
808:
791:
771:
765:
763:
761:
735:
716:
710:
708:
706:
694:
654:
645:
639:
638:
635:
631:
627:
623:
616:
588:
584:
507:
465:welcome page
461:Donald Trump
449:
446:October 2016
423:(worrying);
420:
409:
392:
386:
365:
303:
299:
298:
293:
291:
251:
235:edit warring
215:
195:my talk page
191:village pump
180:
120:edit warring
20:
231:Bull Connor
221:Hello, and
175:not a forum
156:advertising
148:copyrighted
146:, such as:
92:Maintain a
657:Thewellman
320:uninvolved
187:help pages
109:referenced
21:Hello and
800:decision
785:, or the
779:sanctions
744:decision
729:, or the
723:sanctions
381:WP:INDENT
376:WP:THREAD
247:talk page
243:consensus
164:vandalism
27:Knowledge
796:and the
764:It does
740:and the
709:It does
597:Bishonen
520:Bishonen
504:Hi again
433:Bishonen
421:feelings
348:Bishonen
332:policies
266:Grayfell
199:Grayfell
17:Welcome!
371:WP:TALK
245:on the
144:article
131:Sandbox
23:welcome
826:(talk)
593:WP:AGF
589:others
585:assume
344:blocks
326:, our
150:text,
587:that
470:Murph
342:, or
152:libel
136:do so
802:here
746:here
679:talk
661:talk
601:talk
571:talk
548:talk
540:This
524:talk
494:talk
478:talk
473:9000
437:talk
412:here
352:talk
340:bans
314:here
304:The
270:talk
203:talk
181:The
821:Fir
818:een
815:rgr
812:Eve
766:not
711:not
294:not
158:or
133:to
122:or
118:No
25:to
681:)
663:)
599:|
573:)
550:)
529:.
522:|
496:)
480:)
442:.
435:|
395:Mr
350:|
338:,
316:.
272:)
249:.
205:)
154:,
677:(
659:(
606:.
569:(
546:(
492:(
476:(
398:X
357:.
268:(
201:(
177:.
170:.
139:.
126:.
115:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.