User talk:Nick19thind - Knowledge (XXG)

1717:"License to Listings. By submitting listings or advertising to this Site or the Linked Sites, you grant to us and our Affiliates the right and worldwide, perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish, display, distribute, reproduce, copy and make derivative works of the Listings and other Posting or Content you provide us, in any and all media, including under all copyright, publicity, and database rights in and to the Listing, Posting or other Content you post to the Site, in order to allow us to (i) list the Items on the Site, (ii) update or improve the Site and any relevant Services, and/or (iii) make use of such Listings, Postings or Content for uses related to the Site, including electronic or print publications, reference materials, reports or other services or products provided to third parties regarding sales and pertaining to categories of products featured on the Site, provided that any such services or information described in (iv) above shall not include any User’s User Information." 200: 95: 1819: 3420: 2631: 2568: 2497: 2426: 2355: 2190: 2087: 1984: 1916: 1459: 3571: 3320: 3067: 2882: 2827: 2772: 521: 314: 1799:. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Knowledge (XXG), but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Knowledge (XXG), in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- 3175: 2292: 1155: 1385:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Knowledge (XXG) can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 1310:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Knowledge (XXG) can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 3526: 3374: 1658:, for deletion. You claim the cannon in the picture is a falconet, yet it isn't, it's some kind of breach loading device with a muzzle break. The copyright isn't owned by gunbroker.com, it's owned by whoever uploaded the image and wanted to sell the cannon. It could also be replaced by a free equilivant fairly easily.-- 1584:, and the characters aren't even mentioned in that article. Use of images is not a free-for-all and each use must be carefully defended to avoid involving the Wikimedia Foundation in legal liability for breach of copyright. So far, such defence is inadequate, legally. Please address this as a matter of urgency. -- 3601:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of

2717:

policy notes, "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." This article currently has two non-free images. If you think that one of the other images is better, you might want to use it instead of the one I retained, but I do not believe

1213:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note

1028:

Please don't use "ibid" when giving references on Knowledge (XXG). Since Knowledge (XXG) articles frequently change, things get moved around, sentences get added and deleted, etc., it's easy for an "ibid" reference to get separated from the reference it refers to. Instead, if you want to use a ref

217:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

112:

875:

Again, when you add references (for reliable sources), please give all the possible bibliographical information about the source, not just the URL. URLs break commonly, and if you haven't given author/title/date/publisher information, there is no way to find that source again once the URL is no

756:

Not encyclopedic at all, it's only a picture. First of all, the picture is obviously recent, so it doesn't prove anything about the Victorian era (which is what you were citing it to prove stuff about). Secondly, as it's only a picture, it doesn't prove anything about whether or not civilians

678:

Also, when you add references (for reliable sources), please give all the possible bibliographical information about the source, not just the URL. URLs break commonly, and if you haven't given author/title/date/publisher information, there is no way to find that source again once the URL is no

1063:

I had to remove two references that were nothing but pictures of guns. First of all, a picture alone may never be used to verify a fact; secondly, the pictures in the Google Books reference didn't even have anything to do with the claim they were supposed to be verifying (the fact that some

876:

longer being maintained. Furthermore, bare URLs in the references section just look bad, and are discouraged. One solution for you is to use wiki markup to make the article title link to the url (by writing ""); a more robust way to do it is to use the citation templates available at

679:

845: 3343: 3597: 1526:

J. Mazurkewicz (1784-1896) was not an assistant surgeon in Napoleon's army but only in 1831 during the Russo-Polish war (as Jozef Kluczycki) and later in the Crimean War (as Josephe Rostkowska).You can see Knowledge (XXG) fr (Joséphine Rostkowska) with my

542:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

2908:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

2853:

2798:

3346:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3093:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

843:

if it could be expanded a little (they're supposed to have 1500 characters of prose, not counting references etc, I make it about 350 short at the moment). One question though. You say in the intro that he became a Norwegian national hero; but

1215: 1169:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1067:

For now I've commented out the Frost book sourced that you added; since it's a paper source, you need to give a page number each time you use it as a reference. Once you've added page numbers to the references, you may restore them.

708:

It's one thing to use Flayderman for an image; you just can't use it to verify factual information (ie, you can't say "X gun was first made in 1850 because Flayderman says so"—I don't remember the specifics, that sentence is just an

2741:. WikiProject Essex is a collaboration of users who are interested in improving the quality of all of the articles on Knowledge (XXG) about Essex. If you are interested, please feel free to add you name to our list of contributors. 852:

Norwegians, and that they regarded killing him as a "great and heroic act", which sounds like it makes him the opposite of a national hero. Does the other book you cited say something different, of is there a mistake here? Best,

749:

is a commercial website, and the information about the sword was written there by some random guy. There is no review process, nothing scholarly about it, and it is not reliable; you have no idea where that person got his

3244:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 1886:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our 1879:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

3237:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

3090: 644:

That was me. I actually left a message, but it was a reply to an old message around the middle of the talk page, so you probably didn't see it. I made a new one at the bottom of the page so this time it can be seen :)

3350:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --

2912:

2857:

2802:

615:

Someone keeps deleting the images from the page. I've noticed you've added a new image gallery. Looks good. I was thinking about adding an image of a haute couture design of the 2000s. What do you think about that

3097:

3135:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1840:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

883:

If you are intimidated by cite templates, let me know and I can show you how to use them. Or if you don't want to use cite templates at all, you can still include citation information within <ref: -->

3199:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 1246: 1104: 960: 630:

Another editor has removed the Scene setion. Go take a look, Nick. I have requested on the talk page that there needs to be discussion before text or images are just arbitrarily deleted.--

2945: 1497:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2669:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2606:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2535:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2464:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2393:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1954:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 716:

if you're unfamiliar with wiki markup. The refs you added in your last edits still have bare URLs, and still do not provide author, title, publisher, date, or accessdate information. —

23: 3389: 3546:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

1493:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2665:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2602:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2531:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2460:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2389:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1950:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3581: 3292: 539:. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. 2710:.) If you have a source to verify that these lyrics were published before January 1923 or that their copyright has otherwise expired, please be sure to make note of that. 258:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

153:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2850: 1411:- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 1336:- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 221:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

116:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

3007: 2905: 2795: 2658: