Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Noddemix

Source 📝

114: 22: 41: 136:. A search for sources yielded mostly press releases and drive-by mentions of the magazine or its equally non-notable awards ceremony. Lacks in-depth coverage from 49: 183: 187: 89: 76:
is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note.
175: 125: 103: 179: 93: 73: 162: 57: 121: 107: 191: 36:, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several 53: 48:
walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found
85: 69: 45: 200: 29: 158: 133: 145: 137: 77: 33: 144:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
195: 72:
about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The
168:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
21: 205: 97: 65: 61: 28:
Remember that when adding content about health, please only use
112: 20: 186:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
151:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
44:
is how the community classifies them and uses them).
8: 60:to easily format references based on the 157:notice, but please explain why in your 7: 146:deleted for any of several reasons 128:because of the following concern: 14: 40:of sources that discuss health: 32:as references. We typically use 1: 30:high-quality reliable sources 190:allows discussion to reach 171:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 154:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 221: 182:exist. In particular, the 206:04:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 176:proposed deletion process 98:15:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC) 140:to establish notability. 163:the article's talk page 142: 117: 25: 188:articles for deletion 130: 126:proposed for deletion 116: 24: 122:Reactions (magazine) 108:Reactions (magazine) 180:deletion processes 118: 68:. We also provide 26: 104:Proposed deletion 212: 203: 173: 172: 156: 155: 138:reliable sources 115: 82: 220: 219: 215: 214: 213: 211: 210: 209: 201: 184:speedy deletion 170: 169: 153: 152: 113: 111: 78: 56:has a built-in 34:review articles 19: 12: 11: 5: 218: 216: 194:for deletion. 174:will stop the 110: 101: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 217: 208: 207: 204: 199: 198: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 166: 164: 160: 149: 147: 141: 139: 135: 129: 127: 123: 109: 105: 102: 100: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 81: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 58:citation tool 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 23: 16: 196: 178:, but other 167: 159:edit summary 150: 143: 131: 120:The article 119: 79: 74:welcome page 70:style advice 37: 27: 17:References 192:consensus 124:has been 80:Doc James 46:WP:MEDHOW 90:contribs 54:edit box 202:xplicit 134:WP:NMAG 161:or on 132:Fails 52:. The 94:email 38:kinds 86:talk 66:ISBN 62:PMID 50:here 42:here 106:of 64:or 165:. 148:. 96:) 92:· 88:· 197:ℯ 84:(

Index


high-quality reliable sources
review articles
here
WP:MEDHOW
here
edit box
citation tool
PMID
ISBN
style advice
welcome page
Doc James
talk
contribs
email
15:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
Reactions (magazine)
Reactions (magazine)
proposed for deletion
WP:NMAG
reliable sources
deleted for any of several reasons
edit summary
the article's talk page
proposed deletion process
deletion processes
speedy deletion
articles for deletion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.