User talk:Quadell/Archive 26

1645:

living persons that I have seen on wikipedia (with or without rationale), what I still don't understand is that a promotional (non-free, low-res) image is better than having none. It illustrates the subject of the article and (if low-res) could hardly be used for commercial purposes and thus create copyright infringements... It does say that cover art and promotional material is allowed... What I guess I am saying is that it sounds a bit too "paranoid" to me to keep deleting such photos... –

833:" talk-page messages in half. Know that you'll get talk-page questions anyway. Be polite, even when you feel like a broken record. You'll probably get e-mails too. Same deal. Every so often, I'll look through my deletion log to see which images have been reuploaded, and I check them to see if they're the same image with no new licensing info. If they're just unauthorized reuploads I delete them under CFD#4 and leave a warning on the uploader's talk page -- something like 31: 2853:

ones, so as the policy states, since free ones are not available, the fair use ones may be used. Do you see the point here? Furthermore, I see many many examples of fair use photos on wiki from press kits with none being contested. These are the most important photos I could find to convey knowlege that words alone could not. Deleting them will be a dis-service to the reader of wiki. They are not just fluf for the articles. --

887:? These are what I use. Also, I sometimes will find a good photo of a celebrity by an amateur on Flickr or something that's not free, and write to the photographer asking for permission. I've had really good luck with this. Even people who write things like "ABSOLUTELY NO UNAUTHORIZED USE ALLOWED!!!1!" will give full permission once I tell them how much Knowledge (XXG) would like to use their image. Thanks! – 1458:. I believe that images add value to the entries that shows what these bands look like. I am using lo-res pictures that are often found on CD inlay, and are thus promotional photos. I cannot imagine that is hurts these bands to have their picture on wikipedia. Many of these acts rarely appear in public, if at all, and I have not been able to find replaceable free photos. Your help would be appreciated. 549:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2673:. I haven't read what you exactly said, but I do know that SanchiTachi is under an indefinete block, so won't be responding (if that's what required). And please don't contact me about them - I tried to upload images, but really don't understand the fair use stuff etc. (it's not written in clear English). Cheers, 822:, so I avoid those. I mean, if the image is truly sourceless, that's fine, but many of them are album covers or publicity-type shots of fictional characters where the copyright-holder is obvious. I personally don't think we should delete non-sourced album covers, but it's not a fight I want to take on. 2621:

This image was incorrectly tagged with non-commercial use only. Please undelete it to allow me to write a proper fair use rationale for it. It is the mugshot of an executed man, irreplaceable as he will never be arrested again and is now dead. It is perfectly reasonable fair use to use in the article

1975:

I was randomly looking at what else Polbot does, and noticed that it nicks public domain text/data and repackages it as Knowledge (XXG) articles. For US politicians and endangered species so far, by the looks of it. Recycling the content of other websites wasn't really why I got involved in Knowledge

1683:

got replaced. Why bother? But as soon as we began deleting replaceable non-free images, people started finding and creating free ones left and right. The lack of an image is an obvious gap, and people want to fill that gap. There are now hundreds of free images of musicians that never would have been

1678:

Greetings. You said that it seems to you that having a non-free image is better than having no image at all. This may be true in the short run, but think of it this way: if an article already has a perfectly good non-free image that we're allowed to use, why would anyone bother to produce a free one?

1344:

Hi Quadell, I'm glad that you like the new template I created. Following through on your suggestions, I have changed the parameter "screenshot" to "image", and have added an extra paraemter: "other" which will appear as "other information:" and which will allow you to add any extra notes you may wish

1112:

If these are public domain image, we'd certainly like to use them -- thanks for uploading them. I have restored the images for you, but they still have no copyright tags. If you tag them, they won't be deleted, but if you don't, then they'll be deleted after another 7 days. To learn more about how to

696:

Which obviously, if that's still the case, would make it tough to ever get a photo of her with the band. As previously noted, this is totally from the realm of "I Don't Care" - I'm not a big enough fan to know the current status of Ms. Case and her tours; I simply think this is one of the many cases

2880:

that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. . . As examples, pictures of people who are still alive and buildings are almost always replaceable because anybody could just take a camera to them and take a picture." (emphasis added). It may be shocking, but it's true. It's against policy to keep a

2173:

Thanks for your comments. Yes, the underlying art is copyrighted, and any new photograph would be a derivative work. However, in the case of a new photograph, we would only have to provide a rationale for the underlying work, and not for the photograph itself. For these photographs, we would have to

2121:

You tagged images for Tanith Ghosts and Leonatos. All images of both of those two fall under Games Workshop copyright, as the names themselves are even registered. Your tagging of the image, without providing an example of a free image, voids your ability to place a tag on the image. That means that

1429:

Dear "Quadell" recently some of the images I have uploaded have been deleted, while others have not. I am confused as to the rationale why some are deleted and others not... I do not want to engage in an upload/delete "war". I would very much appreciate if you could explain this situation. I can add

751:

Greetings. The Wayne Bourque image is a part of an advertisement, but it is being used to depict Mr. Bourque. Since the person is still alive, someone could take a photograph of him and release that photo under a free license. Because of this, we cannot use a non-free image to depict him. That's our

656:

any more, having established her solo career. Hence, the deleted photo is of a defunct lineup of the band. Hence, you can't go shoot a new one. (And, having a major solo artist in the band certainly makes that old lineup noteable, etc.) However, as previously stated, this is from the realm of "I

2852:

Even the policy listed under this states: in the section, detailed "fair use" rationale states that if there is no free photo a fair use photo may be used. So I say, find a free photo of these units and I will agree with you the ones I uploaded may be deleted. But you will not be able to find free

1644:

Thanks again for your reply and sorry to be a pain... I do understand that as a rule "an image of a living person that merely shows what s/he looks like," and "is is potentially replaceable with a freshly produced free photograph," is unacceptable. I don't want to point out the many other images of

1473:

does not allow us to accept non-free images of active bands, even if they are legal to use under fair use law. It's that first criterion, that requires a non-free image to be non-replaceable, that's the problem. Even if the bands are not very well known, if they are still together then it should be

1402:

Well, some Wikipedians just ignore problems on Commons, thinking of it as an unrelated and separate project. Do you have an account on Commons? I do (I'm an admin there), so I tagged the image {{subst:nsd}} and notified the uploader. Unfortunately, it often takes months for images to get deleted on

2834:

Quadell, I am shocked by your statement. You are pointing me to a guidline not a policy. Please point me to the policy that states this. This guidline does not state what you say it does and I can see nothing wrong with the photos I uploaded. They qualify under fair use policy statements that I

1225:

You can block users (as well as perform other special functions) if you're an administrator. You can become an administrator if the community consensus is that you understand Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and can be trusted to use administrative abilities fairly and in accordance with policy. You can

461:

That's very thoughtful of you to protect the page displaying botched up claims. Whoever is behind this campaign of attempted laundering of "suicide-turned-passed-away" death mode is doing nothing but disservice. If Chris Reynolds has something to do with it, then shame on him and on his Red Flag.

2154:

However... I would argue that SanchiTachi is at least vaguely on the right lines here: any photos of GW minis are covered by GW's copyright as they are derivative works of the miniature itself, so I do not believe it is possible to produce a free image for the topics in question; I have placed a

2360:

Can you not somehow (yeah, that's the difficult bit) detect when the "new text" has introduced "ss" or rather "s]]s"? Or are you going off the idea of a bot changing piped dablinks altogether? I did a bit of work on dab pages, and I was often piping links. Maybe there are turning out to be more

1506:

Thank you for your reply. IT still does not make sense to me. If an image is widely available on the internet, and the artist(s) himself/themselves make it available for promotional purposes, how can it hurt a band to put that image up on wikipedia? Or, let me put it differently, how come

1095:. I seem to have missed the one week grace period, for discussion, defense, etc. Were these the images I remember uploading? If so, am I mis-remembering putting valid tags on them? If I remember correctly that I put tags on them, is there something wrong with my choice of tags? 1184:. Importantly, nobody has said that they prefer the wording currently on the page and several editors, myself included, have expressed strong reservations about this new wording. Unfortunately, not all the editors who participated in the recent edit-warring, including the editor 1155:

discussions. However, when this version was added to the policy, it was immediately replaced with a different wording. I am unsure if the efforts to reach consensus will be more successful this time, but I have started a talk-page survey of opinion on the various formulations

2730:

It's on a time-limited 2 week protection. It's silly to think you have consensus after 2 days. Be patient. These things work themselves out eventually. It's just best not to give the fire more fuel when the editing is hot. Let's let it cool down a bit before unprotecting. –

1083:

I uploaded several images of Chicago's Navy Pier that were found were the work of employees of US Federal agencies. Work of of US Federal agency employees, in performace of their duties are in the public domain. I recall putting valid tags on those images, reflecting this.

2106:, for instance, says "to the Fifty-ninth and to the three succeeding Congresses". I guess this would have to be changed to "to the ], ], ], and ]." This would be challenging. I'll think on it. I'm glad these auto-generated articles are inspiring a little extra learning! – 1345:

to add. I will work on your other suggestions in the near future, but I am currently on a holiday and have only a limited time using an internet connection. I should tell you now however, that because of the change in parameter from screenshot to image, none of the images

524:), or one that is not copyrighted at all. The image you uploaded is a popular one, used on many websites. . . but it's not a free image. Since someone could take Jason Roberts' picture and release that photo under a free license, we can't use a non-free photo of him. See 198:

entries? Because not all piped links on dab pages are incorrect. When a particular item is not directly linked but is instead linked to an article that mentions the disambiguated term, piping is often used--for instance, to direct the link to a relevant anchor within the

597:

Yep, I'm here about about the image I uploaded and you deleted. I wasn't sure about the licesing, so I waited for revision before using it on the article about the manticore. Now, thanks to you, I have a better idea about this licesing thing regarding images, so thanks!

2370:

Well, the trouble is, Polbot can reliably find dab pages with bad pipelinking. But she can't reliably fix them. About half the time, she just changes it from a non-standard format to another non-standard format. I'm not sure whether I'll run this function or not. –

2049: 2541:

which are based also on IUCN data. As for the double-redirects, well it's a tough work for human Wikipedian :), I think there are some bots who check them and fix them. Anyway, thanks for your work. Would it be possible to also categorize those species articles? -

2519:

I changed the quote marks to italics, but now I see that songs use quote marks. Looks like I need to re-read the MoS... Regardless, this is a case where I, personally, prefer to have the description call the item a song, and drop the "(song)" bit by using piping.

1108:

When you uploaded those images, you didn't put any tags on them. Because of this, the software automatically tagged them with a deletion notice, asking them to be deleted in seven days if no tag is added. After seven days there was still no tag, so the images were

896:

Yeah, I actually used one of the examples from the permission requests. Do you know about how long OTRS is taking to process the permissions? Someone already dropped a note on my talk page warning me about uploading a GFDL-licensed image without proof of GFDL.

417: 1750:

You deleted the image under the "invalid fair use" claim... as I read the policy I was supposed to be given 48 hours notice, but got none, so I don't know exactly why they said the fair use claim was invalid... what's the issue and how can I remediate? --

2122:

you have tag spammed. Since you have done this repeatedly without providing of a free image example, you have broken a Wiki rule. Please stop further spamming and follow the rules by providing actual verifiable evidence that there are free image versions.

337:

Greetings. Yes, I deleted the image because it didn't have a copyright tag. Looking over it, I see that the license was described in text -- I should have been more careful. I have now restored the image and placed it back in the article. I also added the

2047:

Yeah, this is a particularly annoying bug. In maybe 1 out of every 500 bios she makes, they end up looking like gobbledy-gook. I don't know why. If you see any more like that (and don't feel like fixing them yourself), just leave them at the bottom of

1130:

Ah. Thanks. Navy Pier images, but not ones I uploaded. I'll look for the ones I uploaded when I get home, and put them on the page... Again, thanks for the restoration. Now that I know I didn't make a mistake in tagging, I don't need them.

2477:

would be a nice start, and then there should be categories based upon where they can be found, I would imagine. As I say, I'm not great on categories myself, otherwise I would add the categories instead of tagging the articles as uncategorised!

2217:

I see Polbot3 has been approved for a trial run of 50 edits. I'll restart discussion over there so we can work out how to do this. If you don't mind, I'd like to review the edits from the trial period and discuss those before going any further.

1769:

for details. According to the logs, the Knowledge (XXG) software automatically tagged the image as "replaceable" when you uploaded it, and stated that the image would be deleted if no reason was given why the image was not replaceable. –

1366:

Hey. I just made another update. There is yet another parameter: "Excl. comp.", which brings "Exclusion compliant?". If = yes, then the bot is added to the category you specified, if no, then it is not added to the category. Thanks, --

519:

Greetings. I'm afraid we can't accept this picture on Knowledge (XXG). The reason is, Knowledge (XXG) is a totally 💕, and we try to use only "free images" whenever possible. A free image is one released under a free license (like the

1684:

created or freely licensed if it weren't for our restrictive policy forbidding all replaceable non-free images. You may still not agree with this policy, I don't know, but I hope you understand it a little better now. All the best, –

693:

Though a regular contributing vocalist for the New Pornographers, Case will not join the band for its own spring tour. "They always make sure they cover territory twice," Case says of the Pornographers. "But I have to work on my own

1349:

are now not appearing, but I have gone ahead and fixed that up for you, if thats okay with you. Thanks for your suggestions, and I hope to make further improvemnts (and perhaps more, specific infoboxes, or sub-infoboxes) soon! --

1198:

Consensus on the talk page now appears pretty solid on draft 1. I've placed requests for opinions on the talk pages of everybody who regularly contributes to the page/talk page, asking for additional comments and opinions.

505:

I have noticed that you have deleted a photo that i uploaded. I am having trouble uploading this picture. Can you please assist me in uploading this picture, as i don't want to waste anymore of your time with my mistakes

2416:

Also, your species articles are not under the species category, but under the genus category. That part I really do not like. That means that genuses have duplicated entries: species articles AND species category (See

2596:. So this would be placing an article in both a more specific and less specific category, which our guideline recommends against. Instead, whenever someone expands one of the articles to non-stub status, they can add 2923:

I notice you are adding NOGALLERY to the fair use for deletion categories. Please note these are specifically exempted from the policy for the very plain reason that people need to see which images are being deleted

2876:, is a guideline, yes. But if you scroll down to the very first section, "Policy", it is an official policy. The very first criterion there says "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available 817:

looking for potentially useful images, and I'll add rationales to those. I would personally only delete NR images that aren't really important to have anyway, but that's just me. I don't understand the idea behind

1847:

Hi i was wondering how to run a bot i have got the instuctions but i dont understand them.I got the user name for it and i got all this stuff but i still dont inderstand if you can help i would REALLY appreciate

1558:

No doubt you are more familiar with the rules and regulations of Knowledge (XXG). Still, either one of us must be confused. I have seen other photos of living people that are not tagged for deletion or disputed,

1214:

Oh yes, thank you for enlightening me on wikipedia's policies by blocking my account, now how can i get the power to block your account for edit warring, deleting information and compulsive obsessive behaviour ?

276:

a second time, and I'm far from confident that my version is superior to yours. But you did ask for a suggestion, and I didn't want to be a nitpicker who wouldn't step up and at least offer an alternative. Best

789:

are backlogged, and wanted to pitch in. But before I jumped into things, I wanted to see if there were any tips or advice you could offer. If you get a chance, drop me a reply. Thanks for your consideration.-

183:

I have a comment and a question about the note that Polbot is leaving on the dab pages it edits. First, it is not true that "All dab entries should begin with a link." Although it would be fair to say that

771:

Two hundred Johns down, maybe 100 more to go? Can't say that I'll be able to finish them as quickly from here on out, I am trying to repair the pages that incorrectly link to the dab pages as well.

272:

Perhaps "(Each entry should contain exactly one blue link, which should usually appear at the beginning of the line. For exceptions and other guidelines, consult ].)" I know it's redundant to mention

1904:

Yeah, I left her a warning. I just left her another message. I'm not comfortable blocking her unless it's clear that she's intentionally violating policy. (It's getting closer.) Who else ya got? –

2717:

is clear, but SlimVirgin appears to me to be determined to block this addition in any way possible. Perhaps that is an uncharitable interpretation, but adding indefinite protection seems extreme.

2641:

I struggled with NFCC#8 and I ended up making a very grandiose and poetic rationale. While it is probably true, can you look at it and suggest anything that needs fixing? Thank you so very much. -

2065:! :-) I've managed to link to several of the things and places he was involved with, though sadly we don't have an article on the steamer tragedy where he lost his life. Have a look at the story 2088:

I don't know how far you are along the run, but would you be able to tweak Polbot to link to the US Congresses? The two I've tidied up didn't link, and the naming convention is easy enough. See

487:

I see you're the one who has been continuing to add unsourced allegations to the article. On Knowledge (XXG), we only add statements that can be backed up with reliable sources. All the best, –

837:, although I'm frequently nicer than that. Lots of times, the uploader doesn't know why the image was deleted, and reuploads it innocently, and just needs to be made aware of what's going on. 1325: 1528:

It doesn't hurt the band. Our non-free content policy isn't just there to make sure we're not hurting the copyright-holders (although that's part of it). It's also to encourage

2748:. Unfortunately the protection isn't time-limited any more, as SlimVirgin has added indefinite-protection to the page. As this is a pretty important page, I've raised this at 2749: 2797:

I totally disagree with you. Fair use says: if a photo might reasonably be found. These photos you are disputing are not resonably findable or I would have used them. --

160:

I'm afraid that if the photographer has granted permission for Knowledge (XXG) to use the image, but hasn't released the image under a free license, we can't use it. See

2294: 2290: 2250: 2246: 257: 1287: 252:

Greetings, and thanks for the feedback. Yes, Polbot's dab task keeps links like ], and she also keeps links like ]. Further, she has a list of all articles that use

1679:

Knowledge (XXG) used to be fairly lax about this, simply tagging such non-free images with "Replace this with a free one as soon as possible", but those images

2428:? Because the species article taxonavigation provides a link to the species category that sometimes (at least when created by your bot) has no taxonavigation. 1151:

Hi there, this is the second time this policy has been protected recently. Last time what appeared to be a consensus wording was produced on the talk page in

2183:

Out of interest, are there precedents for the deletion of non-free photographs of non-free objects for replacement by free photographs of the same? Cheers --

2695:

The admin involved was Jossi, who was not involved in the dispute in any way. I contacted them on their talk page and asked their advice on how to proceed.

1483: 884: 1540:. The rule about not using replaceable non-free images came straight from the top -- Jimbo Wales, founder of Knowledge (XXG). It isn't likely to change. – 657:

Don't Care"... it's just another example of how exubernt deletion is eliminating material that people think can be replaced, but probably, really, can't.

2174:

justify the use of both the figurine's copyright and the photographer's copyright. That's why the photographs themselves are replaceable. All the best, –

2162:, as this is a complicated area of copyright law which has caught many people (including myself) out in the past and bid you well in the future. Cheers -- 1321: 1859:

Hm. What kind of bot are you hoping to run? What would you like it to do? Have you ever written a computer program before? You might want to try using

263:

You're right -- Polbot's html-comment note is a simplification that isn't technically accurate. I'm open to suggestions for rewording. All the best, –

1328:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

741:

Dear Quadell, I'm wondering why you deleted the Wayne Bourque image without an explanation. It fit all the criteria, that you cite on your webpage.

1615:

Both those examples you mentioned are not allowed on Knowledge (XXG). I have tagged them as such. They must have just fallen through the cracks. –

1160:, to try to get a better sense of people's thoughts on the matter. As you are the protecting admin, I'll keep you posted on progress. All the best 2192:

Yes, it's rather common (although I can't think of any off the top of my head). If you want a second/third opinion, you could list the images at

855:

Spent the last couple of days trying to obtain free images from notable people. No luck, except I got an e-mail reply from the B-movie actress

572: 348:

copyright tag, to follow policy. If you add copyright tags to your image uploads, you can prevent them from being unnecessarily deleted. See

2566: 859:. She e-mailed me a photo to use in her article, but forgot to include the GFDL permission and hasn't replied to my follow-up. <sigh: --> 813:, but I tend to leave the controversial ones, mostly because I'm a big sissy. :) Feel free to take those on. Sometimes I'll browse through 2500:

guidelines. I do not know the bot programming, but perhaps it can be modified to recognize such pipelinks and not "fix" them. Cheers! --

2458:

I am no longer running this bot. It is clear that there is no consensus for its functionality, so I stopped this function. All the best, –

478: 1583:

fair Use Rationale, yet has been up since December 2006). Let me repeat that the individuals of whom I have uploaded images belong to the

227:

Forget the question: I can see from the edit histories that Polbot is only changing front-end piped links. I should have looked first. --

2699:. I do not understand this reversion and re-protection by SlimVirgin as Jossi was not part of the edit conflict that led to protection. 1009:

Sorry, Quadell - I know I'll get the hang of this yet. How do you contact a Flickr user? For example, I want to request GFDL license of

1511:

has been up for several weeks with no problem? At any rate, I did contact N.Imperial and he has given me permission to use his photos!

1243:

Where can I go to have someone who is already an administrator stripped of their powers ? Guess who won't be getting support from me.

1227: 1976:(XXG) (writing from sources is much more rewarding), but the incomplete and "notes" state of one of the articles annoyed me, so I did 1786: 1537: 1059: 1478:

to photograph them and release that photo under a free license. Because that's possible, we can't use a non-free image in its place.

1188:

who wrote this controversial formulation, have participated in the discussion. This appearance of agreement is probably an illusion!

2137: 1114: 561: 349: 1892:? He's still uploading problematic images. I'm asking that because I've run into a second issue I would like your help with... -- 2089: 1037: 984:

Oudadell, OK, I will take a pix of Wayne next time I see him, and a general release. From what you say, that would do the trick.

1493:. Or, if the band has broken up, the image may no longer be considered replaceable, so that could be a reason. All the best, – 2745: 2714: 2710: 1181: 1157: 1152: 1092: 2615: 1375: 1358: 906:

I don't really know how long it takes. I assume the note-leaver didn't see the OTRS info on the image description page. –

2925: 2873: 2835:

have found. But I am listening if you want to make your point. So far, I do not see anything wrong with these photos. --

2810: 2744:

We have been discussing this change for about two weeks, and there is strong consensus on the talk page for this wording

2433: 556: 525: 161: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 2193: 1860: 545: 377: 1766: 2908: 384:. Since you participated in the original discussion, I thought you might want to participate in the deletion review. 1482:, above has had good luck writing to the artists asking for free (GFDL) images. If you'd like to try that strategy, 689: 253: 916: 165: 38: 1144: 1088: 2102:

Well, I'm pretty far along, but there are a couple hundred left to do I'd imagine. It's an interesting problem.

1489:

As to why some of your images have been deleted and not others, it could be that some just haven't been deleted

2938:

I only do it for my convenience as I delete them. Feel free to take NOGALLERY out whenever you feel like it. –

2538: 1536:, it wouldn't have hurt the actress -- but then no one would have bothered to create a free image of her, like 1369: 1352: 1230:

if you wish, but I have to be honest with you: I wouldn't be likely to support your candidacy. All the best, –

943: 2414:

In the mean while, your bot the duplicating information. And you risk a fight with those that do the contrary.

1451: 474: 1389: 2817:

created". It may be impossible for you, sitting at your computer, to create a new image of a celebrity. But

1828: 1798: 1533: 1014: 2125: 834: 466: 1317: 381: 2537:

Hello and thank you for nice work in operating Polbot :). I moved these articles based on lists such as:

470: 2670: 2133: 1962: 1479: 1431: 1413: 1393: 1264: 1063: 1041: 1028: 1018: 920: 898: 875: 861: 624: 342: 290: 240: 214: 2066: 1036:

You're too awesome with the great advice - it took less than 20 minutes to get a good free photo of an

613: 1282:

Hi. Another user and I are having a heated debate about the use of Image:Dulé Hill.jpg in the article

2782:, who was not involved in the dispute. I'll wait to see people's advice at ANI before I do anything. 2418: 2092:. Maybe you could even get the clever bot to go back and relink them in the ones she's already done? 959: 362: 328: 2351:

Thanks. Yeah, this is troubling. I'm not sure if this function will improve articles, all in all. –

1933: 688:

You should know better than to believe everything you read in Knowledge (XXG)! :) I was looking at

2069:. Maybe we have an article on the "palace steamers", but I haven't been able to find anything yet. 669: 2497: 1761:

We cannot use portraits of living people on Knowledge (XXG), due to the first criterion listed at

1722: 1646: 1591: 1512: 1460: 273: 2948: 2929: 2642: 2623: 2589: 2437: 1874: 1849: 1822: 1792: 1455: 793: 2552:

Sure! How do you think they should be categorized? I'm not an expert at categorizing species. –

2283: 2239: 1924: 2678: 2582: 2050:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/American_politicians/Representatives

1587: 703: 663: 653: 388: 47: 17: 1762: 753: 150:

I've granted the permission to upload the image on the page. pls do not remove it thank you.

2779: 2449: 2148: 2129: 2103: 1752: 1469:

Greetings. I know, it can be very difficult to find free images of bands. Unfortunately our

1435: 829:

Some advice: add a notice to the top of your talk page like the one on mine. That cuts the "

802: 633:

Some people are exasperating. If you can't fix the uploader, fix the image, I always say. –

278: 228: 202: 2159: 1958: 1470: 1260: 2783: 2753: 2718: 2700: 2696: 2521: 2362: 2219: 2093: 2070: 2039: 2025: 2004: 1981: 1980:. The history of Danville was vaguely interesting. Do you think Polbot would approve? :-) 1894: 1330: 1200: 1189: 1185: 1161: 985: 955: 947: 742: 2479: 2306: 2262: 1291: 1244: 1216: 568: 192:

includes several examples of various kinds of dab entries that don't start with links.

2688: 2496:. Piping to add quotation marks or italics to a title is quite common and within the 883:

That's terrific! See, this is why rejecting rfu images is worth it. Do you know about

697:

where baby and bathwater are being tossed aside for non-existant copyright concerns.

302:

I like it. I've changed my code to use a slightly modified version of this. Thanks! –

2910: 2900: 2597: 2593: 2570: 2562: 2543: 2501: 2474: 1920: 1568: 1132: 1099: 1010: 856: 790: 772: 324: 2951: 2942: 2939: 2932: 2913: 2889: 2886: 2859: 2855: 2841: 2837: 2825: 2822: 2803: 2799: 2786: 2769: 2766: 2756: 2735: 2732: 2721: 2703: 2682: 2674: 2654: 2651: 2645: 2636: 2633: 2626: 2604: 2601: 2573: 2556: 2553: 2546: 2524: 2514: 2511: 2504: 2482: 2462: 2459: 2452: 2375: 2372: 2365: 2355: 2352: 2345: 2342: 2320: 2317: 2310: 2276: 2273: 2266: 2232: 2229: 2222: 2200: 2197: 2187: 2178: 2175: 2166: 2110: 2107: 2096: 2073: 2056: 2053: 2042: 2028: 2021: 2007: 1994: 1991: 1984: 1965: 1947: 1944: 1937: 1908: 1905: 1898: 1877: 1867: 1864: 1852: 1814: 1811: 1774: 1771: 1755: 1725: 1688: 1685: 1649: 1619: 1616: 1594: 1541: 1529: 1515: 1497: 1494: 1463: 1430:

that I have been creating or updating entries for underground metal bands, such as

1416: 1407: 1404: 1396: 1377: 1360: 1334: 1305: 1302: 1294: 1267: 1247: 1234: 1231: 1219: 1203: 1192: 1174: 1171: 1164: 1135: 1121: 1118: 1102: 1066: 1053: 1050: 1044: 1031: 1021: 998: 995: 988: 973: 970: 963: 951: 923: 910: 907: 901: 891: 888: 878: 864: 844: 841: 795: 775: 760: 757: 745: 726: 723: 709: 698: 679: 676: 658: 637: 634: 627: 606: 603: 586: 583: 576: 532: 529: 513: 491: 488: 451: 448: 439: 416: 401: 398: 391: 385: 365: 356: 353: 331: 306: 303: 297: 267: 264: 247: 221: 172: 169: 154: 2445: 1286:. I would appreciate any comments that you have. The argument has already gone to 1283: 2881:

non-free image around in the hopes that a free one will be found; if a free one

1584: 1346: 436: 151: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

623:. Keeps removing the 'no rationale' tags, I really don't want to war with him. 2184: 2163: 871: 801:

Hey, sure. Thanks for being willing to help with the backlog! I take care of

2578:

After thinking it through, I'm going to have to disagree with you here. The

2302: 2258: 649: 1572: 1180:

Hi again, a consensus seems to be developing around draft 1 or 3 as shown

2473:

I'm not great with categories myself- try looking to other bat articles.

1443: 823: 810: 1888:

Hi, Quadell. Did you had the time to deal with the uploader I mentioned

2813:

forbids us from using a non-free image if a free image could be "found

1990:

I don't think I should tell Polbot about it. She'll get jealous. :-) –

1564: 1508: 786: 189: 2392:

I really don't like the fight that is going on on wikicommons arround

620: 435:

comment, which nearly caused the destruction of my keyboard ... :-) --

819: 814: 806: 168:, you will see that it states that it should be speedily deleted. – 2404:

What a strange idea. We should all take a big decision if we want

2038:. It seemed to leave HTML text in there from the original source. 1576: 1439: 194:

And my question is this: Is Polbot removing only piped links that

2669:

You posted some questions or statements about fair use images on

2147:

For information, 4.139.87.53 is almost certainly a sockpuppet of

2821:

could. I'm afraid it's pretty well established in our policy. –

2158:

However however... I also recognise you were placing these tags

809:

daily, so you don't need to worry about those. I also deal with

722:

Your first sentence there made me laugh out loud. Thanks. :-) –

521: 2003:

Looks like she heard anyway, and threw a hissy fit. See below.

1919:

I don't have an image tagging tool. I think you meant to thank

1013:. (Having problems with repeated uploads of fair use images to 552:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2412:. Once the decision made, launch the bot to kill one of those. 2155:

slightly more detailed form of this on the images' talk pages.

1789:, and it was exactly 45,000. I thought that was pretty crazy. 1388:

What should I do when I see no-source images on the Commons? (

25: 164:

for our policy. And if you look at the image you reuploaded,

2709:

What do you want to do here? The consensus on the talk page

2402:

You bot is making theses categories and articles symetric.

915:

I think you're right. Oh, and I just got another one from

52:

This archive page covers comments 1251-1300, from roughly

2885:

be found, we can't use the non-free one. All the best, –

2650:

Looks good. I made an additional #8, more prosaic. :-) –

2297:

for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in

2253:

for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in

2493: 2331: 2298: 2254: 2035: 1977: 1889: 675:

The article says that she is still a current member. –

582:

I wish I had better source information, but I don't. –

432: 1316:

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

323:

You recently took out the link to a deleted image on

539:

Image tagging for Image:Abdulaziz_al-omari_alive.jpg

619:Take a look at the rationale the uploader inserted 258:

Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Polbot 5

2151:, who has been indefinitely banned for disruption. 1590:scene, and rarely, if at all, appear in public. – 256:and ignores those as well. All the details are at 1721:Thanks again. Let's leave it at that then. :-) – 2510:Yeah, Polbot shouldn't have done that. Sorry. – 648:but somebody else probably will: I don't think 498:Deleted picture Jason Roberts Press Pic 2006.JPG 1484:Knowledge (XXG):Requesting copyright permission 1446:, as well as entries on members of such bands, 885:Knowledge (XXG):Example requests for permission 2052:, with the others she can't handle. Thanks! – 1810:Oops, now with this edit it's too high. :-) – 571:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 1322:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion 969:That's great. No objections. All the best, – 785:Hey, I see that a number of subcategories at 8: 2561:When creating articles about bats, just add 2361:exceptions to this 'rule' than you thought? 1532:. If we could have used a non-free image of 942:Regarding your replaceable fairuse claim on 327:; did you also delete the image? If so why? 2926:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free_content#Exemptions 2565:. In future, you can always ask experts at 2426:could you also duplicate the taxonavigation 1509:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Mardukpic.jpg 1412:I'll look into a Commons account - thanks! 1312:Image:ZuleykaRivera.jpg listed for deletion 2034:I fixed it. For what happened, please see 1959:Removing PUI notices and reports at WP:PUI 946:, I moved the image to the album itself, 573:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 414: 2567:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Tree of life 2061:Why are these obscure US politicians so 1093:Image:Navy Pier Dock Street Entrance.JPG 870:Hey, she wrote back! And I got one from 2622:describing his crimes and execution. - 1943:Oops! Oh well. Sorry to bother you. – 1228:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 352:for more information. All the best, – 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2778:The page has now been unprotected by 1425:Another question about deleted images 7: 1115:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 562:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 350:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 2434:commons:Category:Taxodium_distichum 2293:has been approved. Please see the 2249:has been approved. Please see the 644:From the realm of "I Don't Care"... 840:Anything else you want to know? – 546:Image:Abdulaziz_al-omari_alive.jpg 528:for further info. All the best, – 188:entries should begin with a link, 24: 179:Polbot & disambiguation pages 2919:fair use for deletion categories 2874:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2811:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2424:I have a personal favor to ask: 2090:List of United States Congresses 1767:User talk:Quadell/image deletion 1486:has a lot of tips and templates. 557:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 526:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 415: 408:For starting my day with a laugh 29: 2765:That's probably a good move. – 2194:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use review 1861:Knowledge (XXG):AutoWikiBrowser 860:A bunch of work for nothing... 781:Helping with CSD/images backlog 567:This is an automated notice by 2616:Image:Ernestmartinmurderer.png 2488:Piped links on disambiguations 1301:I've now commented, thanks. – 254:Category:Wrong title templates 1: 2592:, which is a sub-category of 1027:Ah, never mind - FlickrMail! 643: 2436:has no taxonavigation, when 1746:Image deletion - jcb-abcnews 1089:Image:Navy Pier Entrance.JPG 994:Absolutely. All the best, – 954:, and removed the claim. -- 691:- which contains the quote: 2333:- there should be only one 1833:• 04:18, July 8, 2007 (UTC) 1803:• 04:13, July 8, 2007 (UTC) 980:Wayne Bourque photo (again) 166:Image:KCH Control Tower.jpg 2970: 2289:Your recent bot approvals 2245:Your recent bot approvals 944:Image:JaniceVidalCover.jpg 938:Image:JaniceVidalCover.jpg 754:non-free content criterion 425:The Barnstar of Good Humor 376:An editor has asked for a 2952:00:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 2890:14:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 2860:14:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 2842:14:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 2809:I'm afraid our policy at 2525:09:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 2419:commons:Category:Taxodium 2117:Tagging Images Improperly 1819:Awwww, you ruined it :-( 1726:02:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1689:01:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 1650:00:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 421: 2943:23:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2933:23:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2914:22:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2903:22:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2826:23:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2804:23:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2787:22:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2770:22:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2757:22:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2736:22:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2722:21:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2704:21:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2683:21:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2655:22:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2646:22:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2637:21:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2627:21:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2605:22:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2574:21:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2557:21:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2547:20:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2539:List of mammals in Sudan 2515:19:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2505:19:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2483:18:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2463:17:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2453:16:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2376:15:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2366:15:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2356:15:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2346:15:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2321:15:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2311:14:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2277:15:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2267:14:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2233:14:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2223:14:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2201:15:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2188:15:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2179:14:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2167:14:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2111:11:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2097:11:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2084:Polbot and US Congresses 2074:11:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2057:10:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2043:10:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2029:05:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 2008:10:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 1995:23:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1985:22:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1966:20:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1948:20:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1938:20:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1909:14:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1899:14:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1878:05:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1873:k thanks i will try it.( 1868:05:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1853:05:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1815:04:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1775:01:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1756:00:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1620:20:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1595:17:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1516:02:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1498:23:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1464:20:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1452:Andrew Harris (musician) 1417:16:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1408:16:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1397:16:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1378:08:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1361:07:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1335:00:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1306:16:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1295:23:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1268:22:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1248:22:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1235:20:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1220:20:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1204:20:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1193:15:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1175:01:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1165:18:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1136:21:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1122:16:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1103:16:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1087:You deleted two images: 1067:01:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1054:01:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 1045:16:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1032:15:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1022:14:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1005:Sorry, one more question 999:14:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 989:14:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 974:11:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 964:05:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 924:14:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 911:12:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 902:12:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 892:11:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 879:09:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 865:03:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 845:12:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 831:why you delete my image! 826:could use the most help. 796:03:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 776:01:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 761:03:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 746:01:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 727:12:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 710:07:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 680:00:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 670:00:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 638:22:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 628:20:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 607:07:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 587:07:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 577:06:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 533:02:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 492:23:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 452:20:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 440:19:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 402:20:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 392:14:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 366:05:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 357:20:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 332:07:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 307:20:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 298:19:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 268:05:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 248:05:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 222:05:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 173:03:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 155:03:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 2432:Sample of the problem: 1534:Mary Elizabeth Winstead 1471:non-free content policy 1318:Image:ZuleykaRivera.jpg 1015:Mary Elizabeth Winstead 397:Thanks, I commented. – 2632:It is now restored. – 950:, and off the person, 2671:User talk:SanchiTachi 2665:User talk:SanchiTachi 2492:I undid this Polbot 2128:comment was added by 2016:Polbot malfunctioning 1432:Judas Iscariot (band) 1320:, has been listed at 835:User:Quadell/reupload 756:. Hope this helps, – 543:Thanks for uploading 509:I hope you can help. 457:red flag abominations 382:Image:Brunokirby2.jpg 42:of past discussions. 1261:Requests for comment 319:Image of Belhus wood 2878:or could be created 2386:Category on Commons 1884:Problem uploader... 1371:Anonymous Dissident 1354:Anonymous Dissident 737:Wayne Bourque image 2679:(Yabba Dabba Doo!) 2590:Category:Bat stubs 2450:commons:User:Liné1 2438:Taxodium_distichum 2410:species categories 2398:species categories 2327:Bad edit by Polbot 1971:Boring politicians 1480:User:Videmus Omnia 1374: 1357: 1117:. All the best, – 614:Image:Ecover12.gif 602:You're welcome! – 200: 2872:The page itself, 2681: 2309: 2265: 2141: 1936: 1834: 1804: 1785:I just looked at 1588:underground music 1368: 1351: 1324:. Please see the 1049:Niiiiiice. :-) – 919:. I'm on a roll! 654:New Pornographers 483: 469:comment added by 445: 444: 294: 244: 218: 193: 64: 63: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Quadell 2961: 2858: 2840: 2802: 2780:User:John Reaves 2677: 2587: 2581: 2406:species articles 2394:species articles 2305: 2261: 2213:Polbot 3 (again) 2123: 2104:J. Edwin Ellerbe 2036:this old version 1932: 1929: 1831: 1825: 1820: 1801: 1795: 1790: 1372: 1355: 1145:WP:Verifiability 1113:tag images, see 707: 701: 667: 661: 482: 463: 419: 412: 411: 347: 341: 295: 292: 288: 283: 245: 242: 238: 233: 219: 216: 212: 207: 59: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2921: 2905: 2854: 2836: 2798: 2795: 2693: 2667: 2619: 2585: 2579: 2535: 2490: 2471: 2388: 2329: 2287: 2243: 2215: 2124:—The preceding 2119: 2086: 2018: 1973: 1956: 1925: 1917: 1886: 1845: 1829: 1823: 1799: 1793: 1787:your edit count 1783: 1781:Your edit count 1748: 1427: 1386: 1370: 1353: 1342: 1314: 1280: 1212: 1186:User:SlimVirgin 1149: 1081: 1007: 982: 948:My Love (album) 940: 853: 783: 769: 739: 704: 699: 664: 659: 652:tours with the 646: 617: 595: 541: 500: 464: 459: 447:Yay! Thanks! – 410: 378:deletion review 374: 372:Deletion review 363:Rjm at sleepers 345: 339: 329:Rjm at sleepers 321: 291: 284: 279: 241: 234: 229: 215: 208: 203: 181: 148: 146:KCH Tower Image 143: 57: 53: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2967: 2965: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2920: 2917: 2904: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2829: 2828: 2794: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2760: 2759: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2725: 2724: 2692: 2686: 2666: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2618: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2588:template adds 2534: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2489: 2486: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2441: 2429: 2423: 2422: 2415: 2413: 2403: 2401: 2391: 2387: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2286: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2242: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2170: 2169: 2156: 2152: 2118: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 1998: 1997: 1972: 1969: 1955: 1954:Check this out 1952: 1951: 1950: 1916: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1885: 1882: 1871: 1870: 1844: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1782: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1501: 1500: 1487: 1459: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1390:Like this one. 1385: 1384:Commons images 1382: 1381: 1380: 1341: 1338: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1238: 1237: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1178: 1177: 1148: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1125: 1124: 1110: 1080: 1079:deleted images 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1038:A-list actress 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 981: 978: 977: 976: 939: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 852: 851:Frustrating... 849: 848: 847: 838: 827: 782: 779: 768: 765: 764: 763: 738: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 715: 714: 713: 712: 683: 682: 645: 642: 641: 640: 616: 611: 610: 609: 594: 593:Thanks Quadell 591: 590: 589: 565: 564: 559: 540: 537: 536: 535: 499: 496: 495: 494: 471:76.217.127.237 458: 455: 443: 442: 428: 427: 422: 420: 409: 406: 405: 404: 373: 370: 369: 368: 359: 320: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 261: 180: 177: 176: 175: 147: 144: 142: 141: 136: 131: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2966: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2941: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2927: 2918: 2916: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2902: 2899: 2891: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2861: 2857: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2843: 2839: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2827: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2792: 2788: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2771: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2758: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2737: 2734: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2723: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2698: 2690: 2687: 2685: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2664: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2625: 2617: 2614: 2606: 2603: 2599: 2598:Category:Bats 2595: 2594:Category:Bats 2591: 2584: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2555: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2545: 2540: 2532: 2526: 2523: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2487: 2485: 2484: 2481: 2476: 2475:Category:Bats 2469:Species stubs 2468: 2464: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2451: 2447: 2446:fr:User:Liné1 2442: 2439: 2435: 2430: 2427: 2420: 2411: 2407: 2399: 2395: 2385: 2377: 2374: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2364: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2354: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2316:Cowabunga! – 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2285: 2282: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2241: 2238: 2234: 2231: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2212: 2202: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2177: 2172: 2171: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2160:in good faith 2157: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2116: 2112: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2095: 2091: 2083: 2075: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2055: 2051: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2015: 2009: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1983: 1979: 1970: 1968: 1967: 1964: 1963:Videmus Omnia 1960: 1953: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1928: 1922: 1921:User:Howcheng 1915:Re: Your tool 1914: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1891: 1883: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1875:Sparrowman980 1869: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1850:Sparrowman980 1843:Help with Bot 1842: 1832: 1826: 1824:thesublime514 1818: 1817: 1816: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1802: 1796: 1794:thesublime514 1788: 1780: 1776: 1773: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1745: 1727: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1690: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1651: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1569:Marduk (band) 1566: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1517: 1514: 1510: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1474:possible for 1472: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1424: 1418: 1415: 1414:Videmus Omnia 1411: 1410: 1409: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1394:Videmus Omnia 1391: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1348: 1339: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1278:Image problem 1277: 1269: 1266: 1265:Videmus Omnia 1263:. Good luck. 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1209: 1205: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1176: 1173: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1154: 1146: 1143: 1137: 1134: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1085: 1078: 1068: 1065: 1064:Videmus Omnia 1062:even better. 1061: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1042:Videmus Omnia 1039: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1029:Videmus Omnia 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1019:Videmus Omnia 1016: 1012: 1004: 1000: 997: 993: 992: 991: 990: 987: 979: 975: 972: 968: 967: 966: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 937: 925: 922: 921:Videmus Omnia 918: 914: 913: 912: 909: 905: 904: 903: 900: 899:Videmus Omnia 895: 894: 893: 890: 886: 882: 881: 880: 877: 876:Videmus Omnia 873: 869: 868: 867: 866: 863: 862:Videmus Omnia 858: 857:Kelli Maroney 850: 846: 843: 839: 836: 832: 828: 825: 821: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 799: 798: 797: 794: 792: 788: 780: 778: 777: 774: 766: 762: 759: 755: 750: 749: 748: 747: 744: 736: 728: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 711: 708: 706: 702: 695: 690: 687: 686: 685: 684: 681: 678: 674: 673: 672: 671: 668: 666: 662: 655: 651: 639: 636: 632: 631: 630: 629: 626: 625:Videmus Omnia 622: 615: 612: 608: 605: 601: 600: 599: 592: 588: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 574: 570: 563: 560: 558: 555: 554: 553: 550: 548: 547: 538: 534: 531: 527: 523: 518: 517: 516: 515: 510: 507: 503: 497: 493: 490: 486: 485: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 456: 454: 453: 450: 441: 438: 434: 430: 429: 426: 423: 418: 413: 407: 403: 400: 396: 395: 394: 393: 390: 387: 383: 379: 371: 367: 364: 360: 358: 355: 351: 344: 336: 335: 334: 333: 330: 326: 325:Belhus, Essex 318: 308: 305: 301: 300: 299: 296: 289: 287: 282: 275: 271: 270: 269: 266: 262: 259: 255: 251: 250: 249: 246: 239: 237: 232: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 213: 211: 206: 197: 191: 187: 178: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 158: 157: 156: 153: 145: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 58:July 10, 2007 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2928:). Cheers. - 2922: 2906: 2882: 2877: 2818: 2814: 2796: 2694: 2691:unprotection 2668: 2620: 2536: 2491: 2472: 2443: 2431: 2425: 2409: 2405: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2295:request page 2288: 2251:request page 2244: 2216: 2120: 2087: 2062: 2022:John B. Macy 2019: 1974: 1957: 1926: 1918: 1893: 1887: 1872: 1846: 1784: 1749: 1680: 1580: 1560: 1530:free content 1490: 1475: 1447: 1428: 1387: 1343: 1329: 1315: 1281: 1213: 1179: 1150: 1097: 1086: 1082: 1008: 983: 952:Janice Vidal 941: 854: 830: 784: 770: 740: 705: 692: 665: 647: 618: 596: 566: 551: 544: 542: 511: 508: 504: 502:Hi Quadell, 501: 460: 446: 424: 375: 343:cc-by-sa-2.0 322: 285: 280: 235: 230: 209: 204: 195: 185: 182: 149: 103: 54:July 4, 2007 43: 37: 2784:Tim Vickers 2754:Tim Vickers 2719:Tim Vickers 2701:Tim Vickers 2390:Hi Quadell, 2272:Yee-haw! – 2149:SanchiTachi 2130:4.139.87.53 2063:interesting 1753:Archibald16 1585:black metal 1579:(which has 1456:N. Imperial 1403:Commons. – 1340:Infobox Bot 1201:Tim Vickers 1190:Tim Vickers 1162:Tim Vickers 1040:on Flickr. 917:Helen Smith 465:—Preceding 36:This is an 2522:Carcharoth 2363:Carcharoth 2220:Carcharoth 2094:Carcharoth 2071:Carcharoth 2040:Carcharoth 2026:Stemonitis 2005:Carcharoth 1982:Carcharoth 1895:Abu badali 1331:Abu badali 1326:discussion 1170:Thanks! – 1147:protection 1060:This one's 1058:Oh, yeah. 1011:this photo 986:Bellagio99 956:Ricky81682 872:John Ringo 767:Re:Upgrade 743:Bellagio99 104:Archive 26 2911:Cary Bass 2901:Cary Bass 2793:Fair Use? 2498:WP:MOSDAB 2480:J Milburn 2228:Great! – 1292:Quentin X 1288:mediation 1284:Dulé Hill 1245:PianoKeys 1226:apply at 1217:PianoKeys 650:Neko Case 569:OrphanBot 274:WP:MOSDAB 2583:bat-stub 2571:Darwinek 2563:Cat:Bats 2544:Darwinek 2502:JHunterJ 2444:Cheers, 2339:theorems 2299:this log 2284:WP:RFBOT 2255:this log 2240:WP:RFBOT 2138:contribs 2126:unsigned 1573:this one 1565:this one 1538:this one 1444:Striborg 1133:Geo Swan 1109:deleted. 1100:Geo Swan 1098:Thanks 824:CAT:DFUI 811:CAT:REFU 791:Andrew c 773:Burzmali 479:contribs 467:unsigned 361:Thanks. 199:article. 2940:Quadell 2887:Quadell 2856:akc9000 2838:akc9000 2823:Quadell 2819:someone 2800:akc9000 2767:Quadell 2733:Quadell 2675:Darkson 2652:Quadell 2634:Quadell 2602:Quadell 2554:Quadell 2533:Species 2512:Quadell 2460:Quadell 2373:Quadell 2353:Quadell 2343:Zundark 2318:Quadell 2291:request 2274:Quadell 2247:request 2230:Quadell 2198:Quadell 2176:Quadell 2108:Quadell 2054:Quadell 1992:Quadell 1945:Quadell 1906:Quadell 1865:Quadell 1812:Quadell 1772:Quadell 1763:WP:NFCC 1686:Quadell 1617:Quadell 1542:Quadell 1495:Quadell 1476:someone 1405:Quadell 1303:Quadell 1232:Quadell 1172:Quadell 1119:Quadell 1051:Quadell 996:Quadell 971:Quadell 908:Quadell 889:Quadell 842:Quadell 787:CAT:CSD 758:Quadell 724:Quadell 700:Jenolen 694:stuff." 677:Quadell 660:Jenolen 635:Quadell 604:Quadell 584:Quadell 530:Quadell 514:sunjay7 512:Thanks 489:Quadell 449:Quadell 399:Quadell 386:Nv8200p 354:Quadell 304:Quadell 265:Quadell 190:MOS:DAB 170:Quadell 39:archive 1765:. See 1723:Branko 1647:Branko 1592:Branko 1513:Branko 1461:Branko 1442:, and 1436:N.I.L. 820:CAT:NS 815:CAT:NR 807:CAT:NL 803:CAT:NT 752:first 437:Pekaje 286:Skewed 236:Skewed 210:Skewed 152:Mike86 2947:Ta. - 2883:could 2185:Pak21 2164:Pak21 1681:never 1577:MADtv 1571:, or 1440:Nortt 1210:Block 1153:these 874:too! 281:Shelf 231:Shelf 205:Shelf 196:begin 16:< 2907:see 2746:Link 2715:here 2713:and 2711:here 2697:Link 2689:WP:V 2600:. – 2569:. - 2494:edit 2440:has. 2341:. -- 2307:Talk 2303:ST47 2301:. -- 2263:Talk 2259:ST47 2257:. -- 2196:. – 2134:talk 2067:here 2024:. -- 2020:See 1978:this 1934:talk 1927:MECU 1890:here 1863:. – 1848:it!( 1830:talk 1800:talk 1561:e.g. 1454:and 1448:e.g. 1347:here 1182:here 1158:here 960:talk 805:and 621:here 522:GFDL 475:talk 433:this 431:For 389:talk 293:Talk 243:Talk 217:Talk 186:most 162:here 2750:ANI 2448:or 2408:or 2396:vs 2337:in 1575:of 1567:of 1491:yet 1392:). 1017:). 380:of 56:to 2815:or 2752:. 2586:}} 2580:{{ 2140:). 2136:• 1961:. 1923:. 1880:) 1855:) 1827:• 1821:— 1797:• 1791:— 1581:no 1563:, 1450:, 1438:, 1434:, 1297:) 1091:; 962:) 575:. 481:) 477:• 346:}} 340:{{ 277:-- 201:-- 139:50 134:40 129:31 124:30 119:29 114:28 109:27 99:25 94:24 89:23 84:22 79:21 74:20 69:10 2949:N 2930:N 2924:( 2643:N 2624:N 2421:) 2400:. 2335:s 2132:( 1931:≈ 1290:( 958:( 473:( 260:. 60:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index