User talk:Quadell/Archive 55

957:(scroll down until you see the title: ZNAMEROVSKIS ČESLOVAS). Unfortunately, little information at the moment can be found on such artists online, especially in English, largely because the generation that knows of them is not well versed with computers, internet or English language. However there is a substantial amount of historic documents that can be found but only in person and in hard copies at local museums, libraries and galleries. I did just that. I completed an extensive research into Czeslaw Znamierowski and was able to located many historic documents about him. Now, myself and several other people are bringing this info online so that everyone can find it more easily. I gave permission to the creators of his official site ( 2871:

means editing the article themselves. One could argue that you are still dealing with and addressing issues by convincing someone else to make the edits. I see that point, but one could also argue that you are not prepared to do what is necessary for a FAC. Imzadi is correct when he says that policy does not prevent you from editing the article to make non-controversial changes in line with consensus. If you choose not to, there will be many reviewers who are not interesting in doing the hard work or reviewing this article, given the suspicion that their concerns may be dealt with only indirectly, slowly, or with communication difficulties. Imzadi's opposition is not due to the

915:, even when I search on the various name variants. Sources don't have to be online; if offline reliable sources establish the artist's notability, that's good enough for us to create the article. But to be honest, I'm not able to understand the sources listed in the references at all. What is "Вечерние новости Nr. 121 ( 2255 ), вторник 25 мая, 1965г. Вильнюс, "Певец Вильнюсского Пейзажа", Р. Алекна"? A book? A magazine? What is "Vakarinės naujienos, Nr. 118 šeštadienis 23 gegužės , 1970, "Gėles kūryboje ir širdyje ", R. Jakutyte"? This line of text in a non-English language is not useful to me for checking to see if the subject is notable or not. 1806: 1932:

too, of course). The irony is that the Spanish common names are probably more often used than English common names for these South American frogs. English common names tend to be direct translations from the scientific name, or derived from the place where the specimens were collected. I don't see anybody saying "Ooh, that's a Kopstein's callulops frog! What a beaut!" At least not on everyday basis... Spanish names might actually be used somewhere. But in any case, there's another similar size bunch of frogs with Spanish names, but I bundled it in a

3302:

IP accounts before registering, and an unblock granted. I'm concerned that might happen. My request is: could you please keep an eye on that User Talk page and keep any patrolling admins up to date on the deeper underlying concerns regarding the usefulness of that editor, so that decisions aren't made just on the account question alone. I'd do this myself but I am involved in content disputes with that editor and they have asked me to stay off their User Talk. Thanks...

1015:

have (most of it is also on the official page) and putting together a chronological summary with chapters about the artist. I have much more to add but hopefully will finish by tomorrow. It would be incredible when other wiki users join as I'm sure there is much more info about Znamierowski out there. Question, how do I combine references, does not seem fair to have you clean up after me, especially that there is more info with these references on the way. With best!

2161:, I don't consider it as 'my' page so there are no personal issues. However I don't want to get involved in any discussion with this user due to time constraints. Also if I keep on reverting the deletions it would lead to so called 'edit war'. Should I leave the page to the good judgement of Knowledge (XXG) administrators and other users. I would very much appreciate if you could advise me the best approach in such a situation given the time constraints. -- 961:), that you found, to use some of that research. In fact if you kindly visit their research page you will see the images of original documents, locations where why were found and translations. I also did what you asked and added an English clarification to the each source and three more books that mention this artist (note: two Soviet books did not have ISBN). Hope that this is satisfactory and again I thank you for all the help that you are providing. 4297: 31: 3899: 1653: 1210: 3046:"Developed by Grand Master Min Q Pai, Nabi Su evolved out of Yun Mu Kwan (a Korean style related to Taekwondo), which Master Pai learned in Korea and taught after emigrating to the United States in the 1950s. In the 1950s through the 1970s, most striking-based Asian martial arts in America were generically referred to as "Karate." Therefore, Master Pai's New York school was originally known as the Yun Mu Kwan Karate Institute." 2528: 588: 953:

that were no longer living after the collapse and were unable to continue exhibiting themselves) were simply lost in the chaos of those events - or at best archived in the libraries. This was the case with Czeslaw Znamierowski. That said in the art institutions, universities and organizations of former USSR, this artist is very well known. For example many of his artworks are located in the National Art Museum of Lithuania:

3955: 4258: 4270: 4252: 4084: 3684: 3326:

probably not going to be watching the situation all that closely. I'm certainly willing to tell other admins my findings and assessments... but I think getting any more closely involved could easily become more of a time-suck than I really want to deal with. Sorry to be less helpful that might have been hoped for, but these situations really aren't my forte. All the best,

4264: 1541: 143: 363:

much.) In the case of this Harrison bio, aside from the most obvious similarities (no straight pasting-in, I hasten to add), I can tell the author's tried to cover his tracks to some degree, here and there – another giveaway, because it's done far from convincingly. It's seeing all those same references from Rock's Backpages that did it for me. I have

886:

newspaper articles, review or information from published book of that time period. All sources where written during Soviet era by well establishes newspapers, magazines and books. I located these sources in the National Library of Lithuania. Due to this, please let me know why these references do not fit the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines. Thank you

561:

particular biographical period were so similar that he clearly had. But the rest of the book had no such issues, and in fact he had done a lot of original reporting and analysis, so I decided not to make a federal case out of it. But it's good to know about the Backwardscopy template, I've added it to that talk page ...

4019:, who stated "This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired. This applies to the United States, Canada, the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years." After being nominated for deletion, the same user expanded that to: 2601:

working with the Grant atlas, uploading the images that are high enough quality that they can be used (unfortunately there is quite a lot of noise in many of them). I understand if these weren't the tasks you had in mind, but I'm totally swamped with material so I don't have any more copyright questions now.

371:

certainly find a heads-up like that pretty helpful.) Could well raise the issue at Copyright Cleanup, as you suggest. I'm thinking that a letter to the publisher is definitely in order. Knowing book publishers, they'll worry – they're just as wary of authors doing this sort of thing as you or I would be.

4178:

I might do that, although to be honest, I'm a little concerned about the nomination. Last time, the only issue most people had was with the quality of the prose. Although I supported the article and feel it fulfills our FA criteria, I have to admit, the prose is not its strong suit. But it looks like

4045:

Thanks, brilliant lookup. "crypto-fan:" that's funny. All the best. So the source I found predates the upload here and being exactly the same resolution I have to presume it is the same one that Suckindiesel used even though he says he scanned it, or maybe it was his original scan before uploading it

3292:

Hi Quadell, thanks very much for reviewing/declining the unblock request at Talk:1zeroate. I 100% agree that—regardless of the merits of the current indef block as stated—due to their editing behavior in general, Knowledge (XXG) would be worse off with an unblock of that account. I think your review

2906:

Thanks, those are really interesting thoughts. I completely see what you're saying about it, and it's about as big a quandary as I've run into in all my years on Knowledge (XXG). Of course, I also recognize I'm about as much of an edge case as they come. I don't quite know the best answer to this—and

2889:

apply to references, for instance, and when I've brought that issue up with the nominators of other articles, they have typically been quick to fix the issue. (Then again, they were willing to make these changes themselves, which made it easier.) Reviewing an article for formatting issues really is a

2600:

Well, I would always appreciate a helping hand in uploading and cropping images (and white-balancing some that are uploaded), or adding captions from the books. The Braus images are all uploaded, but seeing as I don't understand the captions (in German) I haven't started on them. Right now I'm mostly

2156:

is making substantial deletion of content which appears to me vandalism. On checking the contribution page of this user, it appears that s/he has been deleting content quite substantially to other pages also and has been involved in conflicts. This user doesn't have a user page, the contribution list

1270:

instead of complaining that something needs to be done. Thank you so much for taking the time to learn the intricacies of articlehistory, and for helping with cleanup! I hope you won't mind if I let you know when I have more batches that need work; no worries if you are busy elsewhere. In any case it

1039:

It's great that you're adding information. Please be very careful to reword material in your own words. So far as I can tell, you've always been good about that, but a lot of new Wikipedians cut-and-paste information directly from the sources, and of course we can't allow that. So I like to make sure

757:

will be made by non-partisans without topic-banning the vast majority of contributors. It would also involve looking through all the edits of each contributor, to see if each addition of a pro-vaccine sourced statement is balanced by a corresponding anti-vaccine statement, more or less. I truly don't

674:

and cutting out the section on global warming. I'm fine with editors who only want to write about alternative theories instead of evolution, but if they start going into articles solely to remove the word evolution or cut out sourced criticism of their favoured alternative theories, that's different.

475:

Oh, and ChrisG: I know what you mean, but it's not an issue in this case. What I'd been concerned about was a good source for quoted text from a particular Harrison interview – his actual words. The existence of the interview and the gist of his statement, they were well supported; this author's used

2870:

In the first case, I've never seen another case where the nominator was not prepared to personally edit the article, and I'm not sure how it should best be handled. The instructions do say that nominators must "deal with objections" and "make efforts to address objections promptly", and usually that

2181:

This is unfortunate. It appears that this user has some political motive for trying to remove content from pages on topics he doesn't like. This happens on Knowledge (XXG) from time to time, and I'm sorry it has happened in an article you have worked hard in and are trying to get to GA status. I see

1950:

Hello! Yes, I created Polbot and ran the task that created these pages. Honestly, I don't really know the standard for naming species articles... but I'm supportive of any attempt to get them at the right location, and I'm willing to help with that, if I can. (As an admin, I can move over redirects,

1498:

But again, seriously, thanks for joining that conversation! Usually that's the kind of intervention I do for others on that board, so it was a strange experience to be on the other side of it. After a week or two I'll have to revisit those pages, assess my behavior, and see what I can do to avoid it

952:

12:48, 20 November 2013 (EST) Hi there, Thank you for the detailed reply. It is much appreciated. The artist was very well known during the Soviet period. Unfortunately after the collapse of the USSR, vast amounts of information and even public records on majority of Soviet artists (especially those

843:

Regardless, I admire your commitment to NPOV, and I thank you for your many contributions to the sorts of articles most editors aren't willing to get involved in. I do want to ask that further discussion of my comments at WP:A/E be taken there, rather than on my talkpage. (There's an old saw that if

801:

I am deeply convinced by my practice that the only solution to write an article that complies with WP:NPoV is that each contributor alone complies with WP:NPoV and not that each contributors adds his pov's to get a melting pot of all differents pov's on the topic that will not be structured and that

728:

We are not here to edit in a topic in which we have strong feelings. We have to checks what all sources say on a matter, check the reliable and notoriaty of each, and make a fair synthesis of all these. It's clear that the synthesis could be discussed but not the fact that everybody must try to make

441:

Having reviewed a few of your articles for GA, I know how much work you put into them, so I'm sorry it's happened. I'm not sure what, if anything, could be done about something like this. Maybe you can get the publisher to cite Knowledge (XXG) in any future editions, but I don't know. Interestingly,

3301:

I had started a section asking for an indef block for general bad behavior, but that got closed off as moot due to the indef block regarding the account age question. To me it would seem that the basis for the current block could very well be addressed with an explanation that the editor was using

2453:

Thanks very much for your offer. I'll almost certainly take advantage of it; I'm not as confident as Khazar2 that I really understand the fine points of GAR, and I'd be very hesitant to embark on another review (only the second of my career) without an experienced reviewer to call upon for advice.

839:

contributors to controversial articles won't live up to that. It's just being realistic. So long as we require all editors to live up to the same standard, Knowledge (XXG) marches on. I honestly can't think of a case where an editor has been topic-banned, solely for only contributing to one side. I

1931:

Well, frogs are supposed to hop around, right? They were part of a systematic stub creation based on Red List, so the bot created pages for every species assessed by IUCN. Occasionally it got confused with common names, and placed articles under Spanish, French or whatever common name (and English

1536:

Anyway, thanks for improving the article so much! If you feel you owe me one, simply pay it back by saying honestly whether you think I'm out of line, when conflict finds itself my way. If I'm in the right, then it's great to have support, and if I'm in the wrong, I'd rather have gentle correction

3538:

to FAC as well, but I won't hold my breath as I see you're getting really pestered all over the place to review FACs and you're working very hard on the GAN backlog drive. As a future foreword, though, I happen to be a firm believer in reciprocity and giving back to those who help me, and I also

2893:

At this point you have a few choices. You can withdraw the nomination and allow someone else to nominate it, someone who can make any required changes. Or you can revise your plan and state plainly that you are willing to make such changes, unimpeded by either your narrow interpretation of COI or

2646:

where you can see which are the most read articles, and then to improve them in that order from most to least read. As you say it is quite overwhelming to take an image and place it in each article that can benefit from it, so this is my plan. If you'd like to start with the captions, I think the

1881:

and I'd better say so on Commons. Many thanks for the kind remarks. I don't know what LittleJerry and Cwmhiraeth have in mind, but I don't imagine they've considered it. Looking at Crocodile, it's already quite a good and long article - I think it'd be a substantial task to upgrade, and it'd need

1014:

Hello Quadell, thank you for the kind words you left of my talk page. I'm still new to the wiki talk pages so not sure if I need to leave the reply to your comments here or on my talk page. Can you let me know. As for the article, again thanks, yes I'm working through all the historic data that I

2111:

and yes, I have very recently entered the GA process with my first nomination on 22 Nov. I have bookmarked the page created by you and will use the same during my training for GA process. However, please allow me 3-4 days to carefully study the guidelines, instructions and links suggested by you

560:

I just ran across this discussion. Same thing happened to me a couple of years ago with the Tony Bennett article and a mainstream biography that was later published. I contacted the author, who couldn't quite remember if he had read the WP article, but passages on a couple of pages regarding a

395:

No. You cannot use that source to legitimize another. That is circular referencing and that is not allowed. If this person took your work, didn't attribute and did other shady things why would you use anything they write? Though to be fair, Knowledge (XXG)'s articles can be sold for profit, but

362:

I've worked with a good few non-fiction authors who, it must be said, have not been shy about pasting entire paragraphs from an online source (particularly Knowledge (XXG)) into their manuscript, and one tends to develop a nose for it, so to speak. (i.e., the "borrowed" text often stands out so

3325:

I gotta tell you, it always exhausts me to plow through emotional unstructured essays, like the ones that user tends to specialize in. I saw the unblock request, and in order to figure out what was going on, I was willing to examine the user's history and contributions. But I'll be honest: I'm

3030:

Nabi Su is a Modern Hybrid Chinese Martial Art. The reason for your decline was that it did not "provide evidence of notability from reliable sources." You then state that "Popular Science is a reliable source, but that article does not mention Nabi Su." The Poplular Science article was from

2457:

I haven't picked a new article to review yet. Since I'm probably going to ask for your input, are there any topics that you're allergic to? For example, I don't think I could do a good review of an article concerning sports, or TV shows, or manga, among others; similarly, there might well be

2185:

The best way to deal with this kind of situation is to use the article talk page to say why you think the content should stay, then wait for other users to comment, and then restore the content if it looks like notabede is the only one who objects. I'm also watching this page, so hopefully the

885:

Hello. You rejected the article I written about the Soviet artist - Czeslaw Znamierowski. May you please elaborate on the reasoning and what specific corrections are needed. As far as I can see I did provide multiple independent sources that establish this artist's notability. Each source is a

690:

Greetings. You're very right that if a Wikipedian does not want to "play by the rules" -- if he or she frequently removes sourced criticism, for instance, or rewrites sections to favor one POV over another despite consensus on a compromise wording -- then I'd call that "bad behavior" deserving

634:

Hi, I read your comments in the Gilabrand thread and I mostly agree with you. I know of editors who only contribute on one side, for example, user:Jalapenos do exist only writes about Palestinian attacks on Israelis, never the other way around. Yet I have no plans to interfere with his editing

1494:

Anyway, I've withdrawn from the article, so hopefully, that'll be that. There is another qualified editor at the article who's probably willing to guide it through GA--the editor Mark insisted should be the new nominator anyway--so there's no reason for me to stick around and fuel any further

471:

My thanks to all for your input and ideas. It seems only Paul MacD can get even a partial preview (from an earlier version of your message, Paul?) – maybe you also, Yeepsi, in the UK? If everyone could vote on the Amazon page, I think that might be very helpful (either that or I'm grasping at

2430:

Thanks for the offer. At this point I have no plans to expand JHD beyond GA class, through one day I might - would need to get a second source (a book biography for that first). I think the current source I used as primary ref (another encyclopedia) should be good for GA requirement of being

370:

I will look into those options you've listed. Right now, I want to get the word 'round to a few other editors – if nothing else, I'd like to ensure that the review I wrote appears automatically with the book listing, by having more people vote it as "helpful". (As an Amazon customer, I would

2043:

Thank you very much and wow, I never expected it to be so personalised. Currently I'm away and when finally I get time to edit, I shall reply there when I thorough myself with those three links, hope there's no time issue here. Thanks again and it's an honour to be taught by you. Sincerely,

834:

she does the same, and thinks the first editor is clearly biased. I do believe we should all strive to represent all sides fairly, carefully investigating our own biases and adding material that makes our own POV look bad when it's appropriate. I honor those who do. And I recognize that

3375: 3368: 976:

It sounds like you are going about this the right way, and we at Knowledge (XXG) appreciate the research you are doing. I can now confirm that the artist is notable and verifiable, mentioned in several independent, reliable sources. I have accepted the article, which now resides at

2092: 2028: 3996:

was originally uploaded here before being moved to the commons? I found a 2005 external source as there was none give to the commons move so I wondered if the source I found predates the en upload or was copied from here. It is the olny same resolution image I can find. Thanks.

2462: 795:

to provide a fair summary of what is there, it means he doesn't know the topic that he edits given he didn't read the different thesis on this. Therefore he cannot even properly describe the thesis he shares with the nuances that will afford the reader to understand the

3795:

In your edit summary you stated "Leads do not need to cite sources except for direct quotes or particularly controversial statements. See WP:LEAD." which is actually completely wrong. I had a brief look at WP:LEAD and here are a few lines I found especially important:

2890:

lot of work, and no one wants to do this if they feel like their work will be in vain. It is probably your responses here that convinced Imzadi that issues raised in the FAC would not be dealt with quickly, due in part to your resistance to personally edit the article.

1286:

You're very welcome. (I've even helped teach another editor how to make these fixes, so with any luck, we might actually win this War on Badly Formed Article Histories!) If you know of another easy-to-peruse batch of bad histories to look through, please let me know.

296:

I can't check the claim myself: at least for me, sitting in the U.S., Amazon isn't allowing "search inside", and the book doesn't seem to be in Google Books. I would ask my library to buy it so I can check more carefully, but I don't really want to reward the author

2190:

parties are reverting without consensus. That said, you don't have to write a long essay or try to convince the other person. Just say something short and simple, like "This is a large amount of sourced content, not original research, and I don't think it should be

3083:

You are correct: the Popular Science article does discuss Nabi Su, under a previous name. Thank you for your clarification: this is one reliable source that covers the topic to help establish notability. But in order for us to create new articles, it will require

217:

I just want to say thank you for all of your assistance thus far, reviewing the article and images, responding quickly to my questions, etc. I will try to address all of your concerns as soon as possible, though some of them are proving to be a bit tricky to fix!

1974:

Hello Quadell. First of all thank you for your reviewing of this article. Unfortunately (and fortunately), I just discovered the most substantial published work on Fuller, having failed to identify it on several previous literature searches. It has led to

1490:

Hey Q, just wanted to say thanks for productively intervening in that mess. Frankly, I'd hoped a few other editors might comment to move that toward a mutually agreeable solution, but that makes me all the more appreciate your being willing to tackle it.

787:

If we cannot trust a contributor not to fairly contribute with that philosophy, then we will have to WP:STALK him/her to check his contributions and that will harm the climate of collaboration and is again the 4st pillar. That's also demotivating and time

2804:

You're not the only one to have suddenly discovered there's an ocean of copyright complexity you don't fully understand! I think if traffic laws were this complicated, no one would drive. But I'm always available if you have any questions. All the best,

258:. If you get a chance to compare the relevant pages with the wiki articles (that is, if the Amazon search parameters allow for it), I'd be interested to hear your thoughts. I suppose it's odd, sitting where I am – having purchased a book only to figure, 2484:

I'll be glad to help you with performing your second review. (I don't really have any topics I'd want to avoid, though it's polite of you to ask.) I put your mentorship page on my watchlist, and we can discuss your next GAN choice there. All the best,

1840:

Thank you so much! I see that you created this shield from the pages of ancient manuscripts, imbuing it with power. Someday, when I am worthy, I shall figure out just what kind of bird that is, and on that day perhaps I can reach Level Two of Knowledge

3533:

isn't really that much a game, haha. They're not the same as they used to be, thanks to a few critical mistakes, but I've always found passion in the history of the industry and especially of Sega. Speaking of which, if you have time, I just brought

2217:

Yes, you're right s/he appears to be politically motivated. Although it's difficult not to get attached emotionally to your contributions, I should also appreciate the positives coming out of this 'learning curve'. Yes, I agree we'll have to patiently

3581:

Thank you for the thorough review. I hope you found the article interesting. If you happen to have any thoughts on the tip of your tongue on taking the article to FAC, I'd appreciate your feedback. (If not, no bother.) Happy holidays and thanks again

3382:, so I thought I would inform you that the article is back up for featured article for a second attempt. You are welcome to review it and comment on it (or not) if you want, but I figured I would inform that it is back up to spark discussion. Thanks, 1398:

Brand-new users are not "confirmed", so they can't create new pages, and they're not "checked", so their edits show up as needing review in Recent Changes. Once a user account has been around for four days and has made ten edits, the account becomes

1349:

Hey, actually, that's the first I'd heard of massmessage as well! I've looked over the links rather quickly, and it sounds like a good improvement, but I can't figure out how the massmessage right works. When I look at your user rights list, I see

635:

because he is expanding wikipedia with somewhat neutral articles (improving wikipedia). Gilabrand however is quite different; she's not adding information about Palestinian attacks or Israel donating aid. She cuts out criticism of pro-Israel groups

2468:

Thanks again for your offer of help; I hope that once I acquire a little better understanding of the process, I can start reviewing solo, and can make up for some of the time and effort that you and Khazar2 put into making me a better reviewer. -

2221:

In compliance with your advice, I have updated my comments on the talk page. Yes, I do understand now that my actions were more emotionally motivated than objective and I would in future keep the 'consensus' aspect in mind while dealing with such

3603:

interesting. I don't really have any further comments in preparation for FAC, since in the GAN I tried to mention opportunities for improvement even when not technically required for GA status. Best of luck, and happy holidays to you as well.

1517:

Yeah, sorry that situation didn't turn out very well. When I edit in a contentious situation, I try to remember that priority one is to protect my own mental health and enjoyment of life, and priority two is to improve the wiki. Trying to fix

1530:

should be way down at priority ten or so, just behind getting enough potassium in my diet or something. Still, conflict can be so seductive, for totally awful and nonsensical reasons! It's hard to just walk away, but sometimes it's the right

292:

fail nominees for such problems. But although I haven't personally had to deal with plagiarism the other way 'round – professional authors plagiarizing from Knowledge (XXG) – I know that it does happen. I'm sorry to hear that it happened to

327: 2778:

Thank you very much for your input at that dispute about the publication of art works I was embroiled in. I think that would have gone very badly for me without your help. Thanks so much (and that book is excellent - I should say this

724:

I don't understand what kind of problems you have in mind ? At the contrary, I think that this is the key point that would solve all the problems. People should be aware that they have to write all the pov's on an issue by themselves.

2952:

It was fascinating, and not a slog at all. (I've yet to see you write about a boring character.) Thanks for making all those changes and reviewing those sources, and congratulations on crafting such an informative, unbiased account!

844:

you comment on anything I/P-related, vaccine-related, or date-formatting-related, no matter how tangentially, your talk page will consist of nothing but comments about comments for months, and I'd like to avoid that.) All the best, –

3428: 423:

use an example of this. I've clicked "helpful", but the amount of people doesn't seem to change for me unless it's a problem with the amazon servers updating. (I hope Quadell doesn't mind us using their talk page like this). Best,

1049:

For combining references, I have made sure each reference in the article has a name. For instance, one of the references is named "Jakutyte". The first time this reference is used, I write out all the details between the <ref:

3056:

The entire article is about the reporter's experience in 1968 with the Yun Mu Kwan Karate Institute and its founder Master Min Q. Pai, before Master Min Q. Pai changed the name from "Yun Mu Kwan Karate Institute" to "Nabi Su."

1844:

Seriously, your work on the article was invaluable, and I look forward to seeing where it goes next. Do you know if anyone is considering using the information here to improve the more specific crocodilian pages? Crocodilia gets

2186:

consensus decisions will be enforced. We don't really have the luxury of being able to protect an article without getting into discussions with problematic users—if you don't discuss it on the talk page, then it just looks like

1561:

Can do--and I feel your pain on vegetarian Thanksgiving. Luckily, with us having Little Miss Khazar this year, we're hosting for the first time; there'll still be turkey, but much greater emphasis on meatless alternatives... --

988:

are exactly what we need! I would like to help improve the source formatting so that these can be linked. Please look at what the article looks like now, and make sure I haven't inadvertently added any errors. All the best, –

3728:

Thanks! I think he is pretty interesting, and it would be a shame to fail FAC for lack of interest. I thought about reviewing that other one, too and never got to it. It has some potential, I think, it just needs some work.

999:

Wonderful, thank you so much for all your help. I reviewed the modifications you made and they look great. I learned a lot as well and will continue to apply your principles in this and other future articles. All the best!

4179:

no edits have been made to the article since midway through its last review. I think it would go better if you sent it through GOCE again, or had some more informal sort of prose review, to at least show due diligence.

3693: 2409: 3700:

quite interesting, and I see that it's been waiting patiently for over a month, garnering only two reviews. At the very end of November, in preparation for the GAN drive, I finished up as many FACs as I could, and I

2866:

Yes, I've been watching that situation. There are really two different issues: one involves your own editing of the article, and the other involves your responses to Imzadi's substantive criticism of the reference

3049:

The third paragraph of the Popular Science Article reads: "So I find myself climbing a long narrow stairway to Yun Mu Kwan ("where warriors gather to study") Karate Institute in Manhattan's Greenwich Village."

1749:

Greetings. I saw that this article was renominated, but I inferred (perhaps wrongly) that you would prefer that I not comment. I am willing to comment, if you wish. (If not, that's fine too, no hard feelings.)

1731: 600:

For giving me a very kind GA review a few years back at a time when I was very down on Knowledge (XXG). Thanks for encouraging me when I needed it, and for all you do to spread good will around this place! --

289: 1915:

in 2007 from a document called the IUCN Redlist. Is there any way to track down a human who would have asked for these articles to be created? Whoever that person is might have an opinion on the move. Thanks,

1407:

status if they want, even if the account hasn't been around long enough to be autoconfirmed, but for existing autoconfirmed accounts, the confirmed status doesn't do anything. Also, I can give an account the

2381: 2210:. I think now it's His will that I should learn the art of effective communication and also at the same time start shifting my time, attention and focus to my most coveted goal which is to see a 'star' on 699:

establishing consensus. It's very possible that a topic ban might be warranted; I just don't know. But I do know that a pattern of adding pro-Israel (or pro-Palestine) material is a bad reason for a topic

2294:

That's fine. After all, you waited nearly 4 months for the review. I like having deadlines, though, so I'll just arbitrarily choose December 21 as the day it stays on hold until. Does that work for you?

669:

If Gilabrand was editing from an anti-global warming perspective, she would not be expanding articles on critics of global warming and adding criticism to global warming proponents, she would be going to

538:

Hope it's ok to do this. I've just been sent a screen capture of the copyright declaration at the front of the book, and thought it might be useful for anyone who can't get to it. The image can be viewed

4159: 3623: 2801:

You're very welcome. Honestly, I don't think Cullen was hoping to get the images deleted. He had some important questions, and I'm glad to have helped resolved what is honestly quite a complicated issue.

2894:

your hesitancy due to other motives. Or you can continue the FAC as it is, and hope that enough people will support to counteract the opposition that the nomination has already gained. All the best,

691:

sanction. I don't know a lot about Gilabrand (I didn't even know she was a she, embarrassingly), and I'm sure there are lots of people who can better analyze her edits to see if she's indeed working

3706: 2844: 1951:

for instance.) This seems like a bot task though, I would assume, and I'm no longer in a place where I can create and run Knowledge (XXG) bots. If there's anything I can do to help, let me know.

1612: 1608: 239:

As of today, the nomination has only been open for 6 days, so it's fine if the fixes take a couple weeks. I'm willing to help in any way I can. It's a fun little article, and I hope it passes. –

905: 778:

because even if we can easily disagree with some analysis made by historians, we cannot disagree that this point of view exist and is notorious. And therefore, we know that we should report it.

3539:

happen to enjoy reviewing FACs and GANs when I have time, so feel free to let me know if you ever have an article or two you'd like to seek comment on, and I'll be glad to share my thoughts.

912:. The article calls the subject "renowned", and that he made "some of the most notable paintings in the Soviet Union", but I can't find anything about him online outside of his official site 2194:

Regardless, this is unrelated to the fact that it's a GA nominee. It happens to a lot of articles. Be patient, be persistent, keep calm, and I think it will turn out okay. All the best,

255: 2840: 2207: 2158: 2145: 2108: 2088: 2012:

Greetings, I've been interested in quite some time in GA recruitment. Recently I saw you add your name as nominator, would you be interested in taking me as your second recruitee? -

721:

On WP:A/E, you rencently wrote that if the community would try to impose as a standard that people write, each alone, a neutral way, we would create more problems than we resolve.

703:

Thanks for your reasoned comments, and I hope Knowledge (XXG) becomes more and more adept at handling controversial topics as the encyclopedia continues to mature. All the best, –

984:

The "Katalogas „Lietuvos tapyba (1940–1990)“" link you sent me was quite useful, and I added it as a source, and added information I found at that source. Also, the articles at

3993: 3060:

I believe this meets the standard of notability. If I should add something to the article to make the history of the Nabi Su name clearer to the reader, please let me know.

254:

Hey, I felt the need to run this by someone and thought you might be interested. I'm sure the lawyers'll be moving in there soon, but I just posted this on an Amazon page:

3379: 2648: 1063:

Each subsequent time I use this reference, I only have to give the name, and it knows all the rest. But I also have to include the / character at the end, like this:

367:

many of those articles referenced in any book before – Harrison, Beatles, 1960s/70s rock music or otherwise. This author has simply ripped off a free encyclopaedia.

1152: 374:

The only upside is, this author has actually legitimised a source I'd had this nagging doubt about in one song article. So: he repeats what I wrote, now I can use

334: 2882:

The the second case, you don't do yourself any favors by resisting making requested changes, or arguing about whether each and every point is strictly necessary.

1857:

gets well over a million; and neither is a GA. Do you think it would be relatively easy to bring the quality of those up, just based on the work you folks did at

1030:

It's fine to leave a note on my talk page. Alternately, you can leave a note on your talk page, and if you do I'll see it. (This is because I have your talk page

4310: 2431:

comprehensive, but probably not for anything beyond it. I'd be happy to ping you when or if I ever expand it further and list it for milhist A-class. Cheers, --

3669:

at FAC? I don't normally solicit reviews, but I've had a hard time attracting reviewers and the article would certainly benefit from your attention. Thanks,

1936:. I didn't really feel like ramming 300 pages into technical requests... Beyond that, there could be few stragglers with Spanish names, but probably not many. 3198:

I'd be glad to! If you find any articles that you review, that others have nominated, that you think might qualify, feel free to let me know about that too.

2149: 3517:

when the Genesis first came out, but never played it myself.) Regardless, it's always rewarding to review an article that the nominator is passionate about.

2245:

Your response on that talk page was just right. Getting the Ghandi article featured is quite an ambitious goal! I certainly wish you all the best in that.

1768:

Hi Quadell. I'd like to let you know that I will not be able to work on our GA reviews until next week, due to the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday in the US.

3096:

such source, but several will be needed to establish notability. (Note that information from Nabi Su teachers or students of Min Q Pai are not considered

2623:), and so many image resources, that it's difficult to know how to be effective at organizing materials so as to make the content-creators' jobs easier. 2588:

I see you're doing the Braus illustrations now. I'm delighted to see all these quality anatomy images being added. Is there anything I can do to help?

2182:

that another administrator has blocked notabede for a few days, but he may continue this behaviour when he returns. If so, we'll just have to endure it.

1730:

Hi. An article you previously commented at its first FAC has been renominated, and it has been recommended that previous reviewers be alerted about its

1549:

I'm going to totally enjoy my Thanksgiving in Ohio to the highest degree a vegetarian can, and I hope you enjoy the coming week as well. All the best,

1472:

I've no idea. Sometimes the developers move glacially slow, sometimes they rush inadequately-tested changes in, and often they're somewhere inbetween.

1323: 1119: 1111: 1096: 2662:. These images are of very high quality, and could be used for very many articles down the road. The entire text is also public domain and there is a 662:, she makes "villagers...in a field 300 metres inside Jordan" (what the source calls them) into " infiltrators in a field near the armistice line" at 3437: 1979:. Given the changes (which do only affect two sections, if that helps), I wonder if you would take another look and comment if necessary? Apologies. 781:

I add that we are not here to report what we think about a topic but we are here to report what "reliable and notorious" sources think about a topic.

303: 3831:

Hello. This should really be discussed at the article talk page, since it's a question about the article itself. There's already a discussion at

2336:! That's great news. Thanks also for removing the non-free image—I can't believe I missed that! I hope I have the chance to work with you again. 4092:

Message added 20:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2574:, though it takes a lot of time. I'll be back when I'm through the material I have (might take a while with 1800+ images including text to go). 4169: 1142: 1354:. As you can see, it's not even in the list of rights I can't change. I'll look into it more when I've got a little more time. All the best, 1248:

contribution by including so much quality material on a part of North American history that's too often forgotten. My hat's off to you, sir.

4024:|Source=Scan of original in my possesion |Date=1906 |Author=British Government |Permission=This image is in the ] due to its age.<br/: --> 2934: 2691:. There are articles out there for seemingly every singly structure, but their content isn't holding up, and many wouldn't hold up against 1937: 1783:

Oh, I understand. I'm doing the family Thanksgiving thing myself. I'll leave it open another week, so long as you're not giving up on it.

2087:

I'd be delighted. I see that you have just started working with the "Good article" process, which is great, and I hope your nomination of

2619:

help with captions, categories, and inclusion in articles. It's a bit overwhelming! There are so many low-quality anatomy articles (e.g.

1226:- and for sorting out all those damned commas! The articles was recently promoted - thanks for the review and the support. Best regards, 1933: 2571: 2095:, and this page will be the central location where we'll work together to go over instruction, practice, quizzes, etc. See you there! 1994:

Well first off, congratulations on finding such a great source! Yes, I'll look it over when I can and finish my review. All the best,

1495:

conflict. Ideally those other editors there can still bring this to GA while I can finish up work elsewhere, so that'll be a win-win.

3260: 3228: 3175: 3143: 2847:

you started, but I'm a little bewildered (and more than a little frustrated) by the turn it's taken. Curious for your thoughts. Best,

2737: 2651:

are all the uploaded images missing captions. Finding the captions can be done by searching for the image number at: Volume 1 & 3

2031:, and this page will be the central location where we'll work together to go over instruction, practice, quizzes, etc. See you there! 3547: 3494: 3470: 3043:

At that time, Nabi Su was called "Yun Mu Kwan Karate Institute." The first two sentences of my article under "History" state that:

2066:

Hi. The Recruitment Center page says 'available' against your name. Would you please mentor me through the process of GA reviews? -

918:

If the sources are books with ISBNs, perhaps you can list the ISBNs so the books can be referenced. It might also be useful to use

826:

I certainly understand your perspective, and you presented it well. I think it's a tad idealistic; after all, for every editor who

3696:(where I'm currently winning!) and trying to stay off FACs, even though there are several tempting ones available... but this one 2640: 758:

believe such a policy can realistically be fairly enforced, and I wouldn't want to see it selectively enforced. All the best, –

306:

is the guide for people who want to do it the right way. That could be informative, especially regarding the legal requirements.

1316: 1129: 468:

Sorry Quadell, Yeepsi's right – I've routed everybody through here to the Amazon link and our discussion. I'm hope that's okay?

4158:

is back at FAC for the third time. Since you supported it last time, I was wondering if you were willing to look at it again (

3162: 3155: 1805: 919: 282: 3922: 3832: 2822: 2791: 1074: 1057:

Newspaper: Vakarinės naujienos, Nr. 118 šeštadienis 23 gegužės , 1970, "Gėles kūryboje ir širdyje ", R. Jakutyte</ref: -->

3113:

OK. I'll find another reliable source. Thanks for answering so quickly and approving Popular Science as a Reliable Source.

1409: 359:

Many thanks – so helpful, once again. You've got it in a nutshell: we're not used to seeing plagiarism the other way around.

315: 1882:

more than just the info we've provided as it quite rightly goes into more detail on the species it includes. All the best,

784:

Your suggest that we can work in admitting that people only report the point of view that they like... That is a problem :

2540:

Thank you for helping me sort out the copyright issues with two Anatomy atlases that we found to be in the public domain.

2987:

Thanks again for the thorough review. I enjoyed working with you, and the article is much improved by your comments. --

540: 3712:

So seeing as its you, and given the circumstances, I just can't help myself; I'll go ahead and review it. All the best,

1223: 490:

Yah, just to confirm, I can get the prologue and first chapter as a preview, but it may be this is exclusive to the UK.

133: 128: 123: 118: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 2615:

Since the only imaging tool I currently own is MS-Paint, I wouldn't be all that effective at image manipulation. But I

286: 753:

becomes problematic. Realistically, there is no way that the majority of contributions to a contentious article like

300:

I'm not sure what your best move is, since I've never dealt with this before, but I thought I'd list some resources.

2408:

It looks like a strong nominee, but I'm not likely to have time before the end of the year. (I'm trying to focus on

321: 4303: 4296: 226: 38: 2780: 942:, so that the title and author of the source can be clearly understood. I hope this response is helpful to you. – 4102: 2970: 2942: 2818: 2787: 1412:" status so their edits don't show up as needing review; but anyone who's already a reviewer or an admin will be 548: 495: 459: 309: 4236: 4223: 3127:

I did a lot of rewrites, and I think this is a much better article. I am resubmitting it to you now. Thanks.

2558:

If you're willing to crop and upload all those anatomy image files, I'm certainly willing to do the research!

2314: 1941: 1231: 401: 3864:

Your suggestions were most helpful, and I tried my best to directly implement changes to address all of them.

2883: 1103: 771:

I contribute nearly only in the contentious area of the I/P conflict from 1920 to 1948 in Mandatory Palestine.

504:

I too can see the prologue and first chapter only, but cannot search. (And it's fine to discuss this here.) –

3559:

I saw Sega CD was a FAC! Very exciting! It's definitely on my list to look at in January. Good luck with it!

2501:

Thanks for taking on yet another mentee. I'll hit the GAN list and try to find a good article to evaluate.

2157:

has a lot of red marks and also the account is about two months old. Although I contributed significantly to

4211: 3391: 1984: 1887: 1827: 856:

I didn't intend to talk about the current WP:A/E. You made a comment and should not modify this, in no case.

566: 3131: 1041: 3666: 3256: 3224: 3171: 3139: 3118: 3073: 3036: 2733: 2232: 2168: 2119: 2073: 2049: 2017: 749:

It's a terrific goal to have, and I strive for it myself. But if it becomes a reason for a topic ban, the

416: 345:) Knowledge (XXG), they are knowledgeable and careful folks who know close paraphrasing when they see it. 3545: 3492: 3468: 1597: 1020: 1005: 966: 891: 754: 219: 4016: 3800:

the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources.

1911:? These are frogs that are supposed to move to scientific names, but the articles were all created by 1187:

I'd seen that project in the peripheral, but I hadn't actually gotten involved. I'll give it a look.

1016: 1001: 962: 887: 4126: 4046:

here. The author appears to be correct. Anyway, I'm going to modify the commons image. Thanks again.

3825: 2966: 2938: 2506: 2474: 2343: 1921: 1077:, although it can get quite complicated. I'm always available if you need assistance. All the best, 978: 544: 491: 455: 3665:

Quadell, if you're not too busy (and not sick of Gilded Age politicians,) would you mind reviewing

3268: 3236: 3210:

I do a fair amount of reviews. Usually not too highly-viewed. However, I am pretty sure the current

3183: 2745: 2643: 2093:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Seabuckthorn

2029:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Ugog Nizdast

1404: 4324: 4230: 4051: 4002: 3760: 3734: 3674: 3513:

Thank you! Would you believe, I've never actually played a Sega game? (I watched some friends play

2992: 2663: 2282: 1416:

autochecked, so adding the right doesn't actually do anything for those users (such as yourself).

1227: 1031: 864: 809: 739: 680: 397: 156: 3272: 3240: 3187: 2749: 2570:

Haha, I'm happy for any help I can get. Currently working on another book before I get to them at

443: 3916: 3384: 3250:

Thanks for taking a look at these. I left a question about what you have done on the talk page.--

3053:

In the fourth paragraph, he makes his first mention of "Min Q. Pai, 32, Master of the school..."

2394: 1980: 1883: 1823: 1312: 936: 926: 659:, cuts out the reason a village was depopulated was because the Israeli military had attacked it. 562: 312:

is a place to list of books and sites that reuse Knowledge (XXG) content, including improper use.

4317:

I think I've addressed everything. Let me know on the page numbers, if I need to change that.

4219: 4210:

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article

4130: 2275:

I'll get on it, but I've got some big RL commitments over the next 2 weeks, so it may be slow.

1901: 1735: 1400: 3215: 3743:

I hope you're still glad you asked... I know my reviews can be annoyingly demanding at times.

3339: 3251: 3219: 3166: 3135: 3114: 3069: 3032: 2912: 2907:

I suspect nobody does—but I really appreciate you laying it out for me as you see it. Cheers,

2852: 2728: 2684: 2659: 2620: 2437: 2227: 2163: 2114: 2068: 2045: 2013: 1567: 1507: 1276: 1167: 1159: 1107: 791:

If a contributor is not able by himself to take enough distance with its own beliefs to check

606: 420: 47: 17: 3911:

Damn need a few of these after a frenetic year and Xmas. Hope yours is a good one....Cheers,

3459: 3446:

Just wanted to extend to you my greatest thanks for your awesome feedback and support at the

3264: 3232: 3179: 2741: 1452: 1367: 4012:

Perhaps vegetarians get crypto-fan from eating too much tofurkey? Not sure about that one...

3858: 3540: 3487: 3463: 3063:

Thank you again for you time. I appreciate any further comments/corrections that you have.

2783:

needs updating, but of course I wouldn't presume). Bookmarked your copyright page as well.

2107:

Thank you so much for accepting me as your mentee. Thanks also for your wishes for my first

1593: 653:, Israeli settlement (international community view) to Israeli neighbourhood (Israeli view) 519: 430: 190: 3898: 3211: 2727:

FYI, I tinkered a bit further with the plot just while you were finishing up your review.--

2636: 2225:

Thank you so much for guiding me through this and helping me realise my mistakes. Thanks --

1652: 1209: 729:

this fair synthesis and not just to report what scholars who share one's own mind write...

4122: 3839:

I see you started using a previous username. Let's discuss the issue there. All the best,

3821: 3405:

Thanks for notifying me. I'm focusing on GANs this month, but I'll look at it in January.

3351: 3311: 2502: 2470: 2363: 2322: 1967: 1917: 1773: 1739: 671: 4215: 4201: 3626:, I've trimmed the text size at those selections, perhaps you could have another look? — 3298: 1672: 732:

Where is the issue with such a policy (which I thought was the right and accepted one) ?

513:

Same as above – up to the "Be Here Now Liverpool, July 1958" header in Chapter 1. Best,

2527: 587: 4319: 4164: 4155: 4047: 3998: 3962: 3880: 3756: 3730: 3683: 3670: 3633: 2988: 2879:, which he sees as problematic; that's a valid reason to oppose and suggest withdrawal. 2700: 2671: 2606: 2579: 2545: 2277: 2211: 2206:

May be it's fortunate. It was God's will that I should devote my time and attention to

1684: 1462: 1435: 1389: 1339: 1177: 860: 805: 735: 676: 650:, she changes Israeli occupied(international community view) to disputed(Israeli view) 481: 386: 271: 179: 151: 2692: 954: 3912: 3709:, unfortunately, where the issues I brought up were promptly and thoroughly ignored.) 3514: 2465:. Will you be watching that, or should I reach you directly through your talk page? 2387: 2153: 3954: 4343: 4339: 4330: 4285: 4281: 4269: 4251: 4243: 4186: 4182: 4172: 4143: 4139: 4112: 4067: 4063: 4055: 4036: 4032: 4006: 3978: 3974: 3966: 3942: 3938: 3926: 3884: 3846: 3842: 3776: 3772: 3764: 3750: 3746: 3738: 3719: 3715: 3678: 3654: 3650: 3637: 3611: 3607: 3593: 3566: 3562: 3554: 3524: 3520: 3502: 3477: 3451: 3447: 3412: 3408: 3399: 3359: 3333: 3329: 3319: 3277: 3245: 3205: 3201: 3192: 3147: 3122: 3107: 3103: 3077: 3040: 3013: 3009: 2996: 2974: 2960: 2956: 2946: 2920: 2916: 2908: 2901: 2897: 2860: 2856: 2848: 2826: 2812: 2808: 2795: 2767: 2763: 2754: 2704: 2675: 2630: 2626: 2610: 2595: 2591: 2583: 2565: 2561: 2549: 2510: 2492: 2488: 2478: 2443: 2433: 2419: 2415: 2402: 2367: 2353: 2349: 2326: 2302: 2298: 2288: 2252: 2248: 2240: 2201: 2197: 2176: 2139: 2135: 2127: 2102: 2098: 2081: 2053: 2038: 2034: 2021: 2001: 1997: 1988: 1958: 1954: 1945: 1925: 1891: 1868: 1864: 1831: 1790: 1786: 1777: 1757: 1753: 1743: 1717: 1713: 1705: 1701: 1688: 1635: 1631: 1623: 1620: 1601: 1571: 1563: 1556: 1552: 1511: 1503: 1479: 1475: 1466: 1439: 1423: 1419: 1393: 1377: 1373: 1361: 1357: 1343: 1294: 1290: 1280: 1272: 1271:

is an immense relief to know someone else knows how to do this work. Thanks again.

1255: 1251: 1235: 1194: 1190: 1181: 1084: 1080: 1024: 1009: 993: 990: 985: 970: 946: 943: 895: 868: 848: 845: 813: 762: 759: 743: 707: 704: 684: 623: 620: 610: 602: 570: 552: 524: 508: 505: 499: 485: 463: 435: 405: 390: 354: 351: 275: 243: 240: 233: 204: 201: 194: 172: 169: 162: 4257: 3454:. Thank you for helping to increase the quality of Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 3342:

isn't being fooled by the logorrhea they have been posting, so we might be good.

4023:{{Information |Description=Viceregal Commission on Irish Railways map<br/: --> 2839:

I don't know if you've checked back in with the discussion on my FAC, either the

2652: 1311:

I'd never heard of this before, but it seems quite useful, I saw it used over at

1118:

List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here:

3092:

reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This proposed article has

2337: 1912: 1667: 514: 425: 318:

is the suggested process (though it seems to assume the offenders are websites).

186: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4015:

Anyway, this image was first uploaded to Knowledge (XXG) November 19, 2006, by

3806:

there is not, however, an exception to citation requirements specific to leads.

2937:! I know that it was a bit of a slog, but I hope that you enjoyed reading it ! 2760:

I saw that. Those were all positive improvements. Congrats on your latest GA.

2144:

Hi. I need advice based on your experience on Knowledge (XXG). It's about this

3992:

to edit. When you get a chance to check it out, can you possibly tell me when

3989: 3817: 3344: 3304: 2359: 2358:........ Looks like you enjoyed much more than turkey during Thanksgiving! ;) 2318: 1858: 1819: 1769: 1616: 1589: 328:

User:PrimeHunter/Alphascript Publishing sells free articles as expensive books

3958: 3875: 3628: 3587: 2696: 2667: 2602: 2575: 2541: 1854: 1850: 1698:

Thank you, CIRT. I'm glad it was promoted, and I hope you enjoy your trip.

1679: 1457: 1430: 1384: 1334: 1172: 830:

he fairly and appropriately considers all sizes, there's another editor who

663: 477: 382: 267: 3427: 2340: 1878: 185:

Thanks for the review! I have hopefully addressed all of the issues now.

4263: 476:

the same quote, sourced it to the same radio interview, so all is okay.

281:

Wow, that's terrible! As a Knowledge (XXG) reviewer, I always check for

3535: 2688: 1607:

Wow, that's an impressively-thorough article! I'm currently working on

1266:

It is a very rare day indeed when someone shows up on my talk page and

695:

consensus, or if she is merely advocating one POV as part of a process

913: 4029:

But it had no life here before 2006. All the best to you and yours,

2654:(volume 2 is not searchable, - the other are searchable by selecting 2027:

I'd be glad to. I created a page for your GA Reviewer Mentorship at

1499:

in the future. (Certainly I could have been more patient, at least.)

958: 774:

If often said myself that I didn't understand why it was contentious

3692:

Well... ordinarily I'd say no, since this month I'm focusing on the

451: 3705:

reviewed this one then. (Instead, I spent too much time working on

3624:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured portal candidates/Portal:Freedom of speech

3618:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured portal candidates/Portal:Freedom of speech

2317:. Thank you for your hard work on both of the GANs that we traded! 2091:

goes smoothly. I created a page for your GA Reviewer Mentorship at

1138:

Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using

396:

attribution is required by CC by SA. Congrats - you are published.

4336:

It's been a pleasure. I hope we can work together again sometime.

3682: 1455:, I wonder how long it will be until/when/if that takes effect? — 447: 419:}} template on the talk pages of the suspected content. I've seen 4226:

with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1135:

to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.

908:. Before we can keep an article, we have to verify the subject's 4025:|other_versions= }} == License information == {{PD-BritishGov}} 3809:

The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a

3455: 1613:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Fuck (film)/archive1

1382:

Okay. Also, what is "autochecked user" and "confirmed user" ? —

3755:

I am! FAC needs thorough reviews to keep our standards high. --

906:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Czeslaw Znamierowski

3769:

Resolved. Glad to help, and I suspect it'll sail through now.

1114:. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do: 337:. Although these folks usually deal with copyright violations 25: 3816:

Please do not remove the maintenance template again, thanks!

2461:

As with my first GAR, I'll probably do my scratchwork at the

656:, cuts out information about a massacre commited by Israelis 454:

as its main source, so in theory the same should apply here.

4313:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4295: 4082: 3161:

It sound like you review nominees. Could you please look at

2313:

Hi Quadell. Just letting you know that I passed the GAN for

324:

is the (rather vague) guidance from the Wikimedia Foundation

1351: 4089:

Hello, Quadell. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2647:

Sobotta ones are the easiest to add. The commons category

1537:

from a friend than encouragement to continue being wrong.

1120:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants

52:

This archive page covers comments 2701-2750, from roughly

3338:

OK, thanks for considering anyway. As it's turning out,

2649:

commons:Category:Sobotta's Anatomy plates missing caption

1710:

Also, I have no idea why I typed your name in all caps.

2132:

There's no time limit, so take whatever time you need.

316:

Knowledge (XXG):Mirrors and forks#Non-compliance process

4094: 3369:

2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game FAC 2

3294: 1976: 1908: 901:

Greetings. Sure, I'll be willing to help you with this.

660: 657: 654: 651: 648: 645: 642: 639: 636: 3971:

And a delightful Boxing Day to you as well, kind sir.

2089:

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

3994:

w:File:Map Rail Ireland Viceregal Commission 1906.jpg

2412:

this month.) Still, I hope it passes! All the best,

1322:

I'd like to use it to deliver messages to members of

1244:

Oh, I just added and removed some commas. You made a

3988:

Happy turkey day to you. Hope you are not loaded on

4309:Message added 21:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC). You can 4222:. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to 2658:). A gallery of all these images is available here 955:

http://www.ldm.lt/dailininkai/Tapyba_19401990_Z.htm

200:Yep, I've gone ahead and promoted it. Well done! – 3833:Talk:We Don't Need to Whisper#Lead needs citations 2786:I'm astonished how little I know about copyright! 1222:Hi Quadell, many thanks for casting your eye over 1153:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech 335:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Copyright Cleanup 3380:2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game 2635:Well, my hope is to get a list like this one for 2933:Thank you very much for undertaking the GAR for 1091:Invitation to join WikiProject Freedom of speech 986:http://www.czeslawznamierowski.com/research.html 168:I look forward to seeing what you'll do next. – 3647:you'd fix that promptly! Yes, I'll go comment. 1453:WP:VPPR#Create new user group for m:MassMessage 1428:Ah, I see, thanks, that makes sense. Cheers, — 1158:Notify others you think might be interested in 304:Knowledge (XXG):Reusing Knowledge (XXG) content 4136:Oooh, a new toy to play with! Thank you much. 3867:I think the article looks much better for it. 3027:Thank you for reviewing my article "Nabi Su." 2687:is most definitely a candidate for a merge to 2214:before the end of 2014. So "Thy will be done". 8: 1308:Could I please get the "massmessage" right? 1305:Hi there Quadell, I hope you're doing well. 256:review for Graeme Thomson's new Harrison bio 1611:, as you know, and I may need to plow into 4302:Hello, Quadell. You have new messages at 3811:case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. 3293:of the editor's contribs was spot on, and 1977:these significant revisions of the article 1849:a quarter-million pageviews per year, but 4209: 2572:commons:Category:Sobotta's Anatomy plates 1818:For Reviewing Beyond the Call of Duty on 260:Hang on a darn minute … I think I helped 149:thank you for you guidance and patience - 4196: 3803:and be carefully sourced as appropriate. 1588:. After you're done could you GA review 840:think it's a dangerous precedent to set. 3486:this WikiAward was given to Quadell by 619:Aw, wow, that made my whole weekend. – 4278:Ah, thank you! Looking forward to it. 3857:Thanks for taking on the GA Review of 3622:Thanks very much for your comments at 3425: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3163:Wikipedia_talk:Million_Award#Nominees 3156:Wikipedia_talk:Million_Award#Nominees 2666:for when text is sourced from there. 2434:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1665:Thank you for your help copy editing 1502:So I owe you one! Enjoy the week, -- 415:It could be a good idea to use the {{ 7: 4093: 2935:Fidel Castro in the Cuban Revolution 2534:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 2112:under the first step. Thanks again - 1538: 594:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 3935:You keep being awesome, Cas Liber. 1403:. Admins can give new accounts the 330:is an essay about a clear violator. 2458:subjects that you'd rather avoid. 1366:Follow-up: I just found out about 959:http://www.czeslawznamierowski.com 333:Finally, you might want to ask at 283:Knowledge (XXG):Close paraphrasing 24: 3214:I am reviewing is highly-viewed ( 3002:Truly, it was my pleasure. Thank 1619:next on my list. All the best, – 1073:There's lots more information at 641:, she cuts out the word Palestine 4268: 4262: 4256: 4250: 4214:that you recently nominated for 3953: 3897: 3450:FAC, and then your GA review of 3426: 2817:Thanks. I love Knowledge (XXG). 2526: 1804: 1651: 1539: 1324:WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech 1208: 1112:WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech 1097:WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech 586: 141: 29: 3905:Cheers, pina coladas all round! 3790: 3462:I extend to you my gratitude. 1317:User:MediaWiki message delivery 1301:Request for "massmessage" right 1166:Thank you for your interest in 322:m:GFDL and CC-BY-SA enforcement 3020:Nabi Su Article for Submission 2152:of this page, all of a sudden 1075:Help:Referencing for beginners 1067:<ref name="Jakutyte" /: --> 1: 4286:13:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC) 4244:01:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC) 4187:12:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC) 4173:22:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 4144:12:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC) 4131:20:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 4068:21:51, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 4056:16:43, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 4037:12:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 4007:22:13, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 3984:Can you look up an old image? 3979:20:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 3967:20:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 3949:Glad Tidings and all that ... 3943:12:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 3927:09:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 3885:20:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC) 3847:17:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 3826:16:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 3777:20:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 3765:14:53, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 3751:14:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 3739:16:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 3720:14:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 3679:13:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 3655:20:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 3638:20:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 3612:15:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 3594:14:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 3567:12:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 3555:03:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 3525:13:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 3503:23:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3478:23:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3413:16:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 3400:16:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 3360:13:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 3334:13:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 3320:02:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 3278:16:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 3246:04:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 3206:23:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 3193:22:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 3148:01:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 3014:18:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 2997:14:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 2975:18:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 2961:16:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 2947:16:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 2584:15:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 2566:15:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 2550:15:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 2519:A barnstar for you! (anatomy) 2140:13:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 2128:01:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 2103:14:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2082:05:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC) 2054:13:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 2039:13:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 2022:13:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 2002:13:29, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1989:11:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1959:13:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1946:09:01, 28 November 2013 (UTC) 1926:23:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC) 1892:12:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC) 1869:12:12, 27 November 2013 (UTC) 1832:09:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC) 1791:00:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC) 1778:23:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1758:03:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1744:03:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1718:03:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1706:13:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC) 1689:22:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 1636:02:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC) 1624:12:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 1602:04:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 1572:14:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 1557:13:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 1512:23:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1480:14:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 1467:04:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 1440:18:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1424:18:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1394:18:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1378:14:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1362:12:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1344:04:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1295:14:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 1281:04:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 1256:14:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1236:11:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1195:14:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1182:04:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC) 1143:WikiProject Freedom of speech 1085:19:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 1025:18:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 1010:19:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 994:19:11, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 971:18:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 947:12:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 896:00:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 869:18:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 849:12:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 814:04:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 763:22:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 744:22:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 708:01:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 685:00:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 624:15:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC) 611:20:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 571:03:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC) 244:21:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 234:21:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 205:14:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 195:01:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 173:16:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 163:08:15, 13 November 2013 (UTC) 4098:at any time by removing the 3837:you're welcome to join in on 3123:18:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 3108:17:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 3078:16:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 3041:18:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 2921:04:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 2902:17:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 2861:16:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 2827:21:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 2813:21:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 2796:21:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 2768:20:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 2755:20:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC) 2705:18:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 2676:17:36, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 2631:16:36, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 2611:15:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 2596:03:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 2511:21:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2493:18:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2479:17:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2444:02:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2420:13:39, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2403:03:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2368:00:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2354:13:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2327:03:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2303:13:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2289:01:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 2253:22:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2241:22:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2202:13:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 2177:06:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1056:<ref name="Jakutyte": --> 553:21:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 525:21:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 509:21:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 500:21:17, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 486:20:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 464:19:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 436:18:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 406:18:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 391:16:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 355:13:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 310:Knowledge (XXG):Republishers 276:10:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 4344:13:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 4331:21:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 2309:J.D.B. v. North Carolina GA 904:The proposed article is at 4360: 4304:Talk:People v. Aguilar/GA1 4077: 1812:The Natural History Shield 4249: 4218:-status according to the 4199: 3896: 3432: 3374:Hello; you gave input on 3006:for your thorough work. 2525: 1803: 1659:The Copyeditor's Barnstar 1650: 1368:this pertinent discussion 1224:Spanish conquest of Petén 1216:The Copyeditor's Barnstar 1207: 585: 3890:Happy holiday season.... 3791:We Don't Need to Whisper 2315:J.D.B. v. North Carolina 1934:much bigger move request 1853:gets 700K pageviews and 1162:to join the WikiProject. 647:, and State of Palestine 4170:Project Fillmore County 3853:Fucking Machines thanks 3687:Decisions, decisions... 3661:William Hayden English 3458:, and on behalf of the 2062:Would you be my mentor? 1040:new users are aware of 802:nobody will understand. 378:as my source … Bizarre. 4300: 4087: 3688: 3667:William Hayden English 2929:Thank you for the GAR! 2380:Hi can you comment on 1268:offers to do something 1151:Join in discussion at 1130:User Freedom of speech 4299: 4086: 3686: 2410:the GAN Backlog Drive 1584:Thanks for reviewing 1042:our plagiarism policy 755:Vaccine controversies 42:of past discussions. 4154:Hello, Quadell. The 3707:this other candidate 3599:I found the article 3550:remember the past... 3497:remember the past... 3473:remember the past... 3376:the first nomination 2819:Coat of Many Colours 2788:Coat of Many Colours 1677:Much appreciated! — 979:Czeslaw Znamierowski 859:Thx for reading me. 3419:A barnstar for you! 2148:. If you check the 1909:these move requests 1644:A barnstar for you! 1609:the Nigersaurus FAC 1315:, and explained at 1201:A barnstar for you! 579:A barnstar for you! 4311:remove this notice 4301: 4095:remove this notice 4088: 3689: 2664:Template:Sobotta's 1900:Crowd of frogs at 1797:Crocodilian review 1726:Renomination alert 1628:Almost done now! 1313:User talk:Ian Rose 920:Citation templates 381:Big thanks again. 4276: 4275: 3932: 3931: 3694:GAN backlog drive 3510: 3509: 3276: 3244: 3191: 3151: 3134:comment added by 2753: 2685:Subscapular fossa 2660:User:CFCF/Sobotta 2621:Subscapular fossa 2555: 2554: 2008:Still recruiting? 1837: 1836: 1695: 1694: 1241: 1240: 1168:Freedom of speech 1160:Freedom of speech 1108:Freedom of speech 1052:tags, like this: 1051:and </ref: --> 616: 615: 523: 434: 421:Talk:Jimi Hendrix 64: 63: 54:November 13, 2013 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Quadell 4351: 4342: 4329: 4327: 4322: 4314: 4284: 4272: 4266: 4260: 4254: 4242: 4239: 4233: 4197: 4185: 4168:. Help out with 4142: 4119: 4117: 4111: 4107: 4101: 4097: 4085: 4078:You've got mail! 4066: 4035: 3977: 3957: 3941: 3901: 3894: 3893: 3859:Fucking Machines 3845: 3775: 3749: 3718: 3653: 3610: 3592: 3590: 3586: 3565: 3551: 3543: 3523: 3498: 3490: 3474: 3466: 3430: 3423: 3422: 3411: 3395: 3388: 3358: 3356: 3349: 3332: 3318: 3316: 3309: 3254: 3222: 3216:Schindler's List 3204: 3169: 3150: 3128: 3106: 3012: 2959: 2900: 2811: 2766: 2731: 2629: 2594: 2564: 2530: 2523: 2522: 2491: 2440: 2418: 2401: 2392: 2352: 2301: 2287: 2285: 2280: 2251: 2239: 2237: 2230: 2200: 2175: 2173: 2166: 2138: 2126: 2124: 2117: 2101: 2080: 2078: 2071: 2037: 2000: 1970:, with apologies 1957: 1867: 1822:and elsewhere. 1808: 1801: 1800: 1789: 1756: 1716: 1704: 1655: 1648: 1647: 1634: 1555: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1478: 1422: 1376: 1360: 1293: 1254: 1212: 1205: 1204: 1193: 1147: 1141: 1134: 1128: 1083: 1068: 1058: 941: 935: 931: 925: 793:all side sources 590: 583: 582: 517: 428: 350:All the best, – 229: 222: 221:Another Believer 161: 159: 154: 145: 144: 59: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4359: 4358: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4337: 4325: 4320: 4318: 4315: 4308: 4293: 4279: 4237: 4231: 4229: 4205: 4195: 4180: 4152: 4137: 4120: 4115: 4109: 4105: 4103:You've got mail 4099: 4091: 4083: 4080: 4061: 4030: 4026: 3986: 3972: 3951: 3936: 3892: 3855: 3840: 3793: 3770: 3744: 3713: 3663: 3648: 3620: 3605: 3588: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3560: 3552: 3549: 3541: 3518: 3506: 3499: 3496: 3488: 3475: 3472: 3464: 3460:Sega Task Force 3438:Sega Task Force 3421: 3406: 3393: 3386: 3372: 3352: 3345: 3343: 3327: 3312: 3305: 3303: 3290: 3199: 3159: 3129: 3101: 3022: 3007: 2985: 2967:Midnightblueowl 2954: 2939:Midnightblueowl 2931: 2895: 2841:main nomination 2837: 2806: 2776: 2761: 2725: 2624: 2589: 2559: 2521: 2486: 2463:mentorship page 2451: 2442: 2438: 2428: 2413: 2399: 2388: 2385: 2382:this nomination 2378: 2347: 2311: 2296: 2283: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2246: 2233: 2228: 2226: 2195: 2169: 2164: 2162: 2133: 2120: 2115: 2113: 2096: 2074: 2069: 2067: 2064: 2032: 2010: 1995: 1972: 1968:Florence Fuller 1952: 1905: 1862: 1799: 1784: 1766: 1751: 1728: 1711: 1699: 1646: 1629: 1615:, but I'll put 1582: 1550: 1540: 1488: 1473: 1451:I commented at 1417: 1371: 1355: 1303: 1288: 1264: 1249: 1203: 1188: 1145: 1139: 1132: 1126: 1093: 1078: 1066: 1055: 1044:, just in case. 1032:on my watchlist 939: 933: 929: 923: 883: 716: 672:Hurricane Sandy 632: 581: 545:Paul MacDermott 492:Paul MacDermott 456:Paul MacDermott 450:that cites the 252: 232: 227: 220: 215: 212:Weather Machine 183: 157: 152: 150: 147: 142: 138: 58:January 1, 2014 57: 53: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4357: 4355: 4347: 4346: 4307: 4294: 4292: 4289: 4274: 4273: 4247: 4246: 4232:Chris Troutman 4228: 4227: 4212:United Nations 4207: 4206: 4200: 4194: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4156:1924 Rose Bowl 4151: 4150:1924 Rose Bowl 4148: 4147: 4146: 4090: 4081: 4079: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4040: 4039: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4013: 3985: 3982: 3950: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3930: 3929: 3908: 3907: 3902: 3891: 3888: 3870:Thanks again, 3854: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3814: 3813: 3807: 3804: 3801: 3792: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3723: 3722: 3710: 3662: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3619: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3578: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3548: 3529:Really, now? 3508: 3507: 3495: 3484: 3481: 3480: 3471: 3443: 3442: 3433: 3431: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3371: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3289: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3158: 3153: 3111: 3110: 3024:Dear Quadell, 3021: 3018: 3017: 3016: 2984: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2930: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2891: 2884:WP:OVERLINKING 2880: 2868: 2836: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2802: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2724: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2553: 2552: 2537: 2536: 2531: 2520: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2496: 2495: 2450: 2447: 2432: 2427: 2426:re: JHD review 2424: 2423: 2422: 2395: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2310: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2272: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2192: 2183: 2063: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1971: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1938:88.148.249.186 1904: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1872: 1871: 1842: 1835: 1834: 1815: 1814: 1809: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1693: 1692: 1671:on its way to 1662: 1661: 1656: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1546: 1545: 1533: 1532: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1364: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1239: 1238: 1228:Simon Burchell 1219: 1218: 1213: 1202: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1164: 1163: 1156: 1149: 1136: 1123: 1100: 1099: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1046: 1045: 1036: 1035: 997: 996: 982: 950: 949: 916: 902: 882: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 857: 854: 841: 819: 818: 817: 816: 803: 799: 798: 797: 796:controversies. 789: 782: 779: 772: 766: 765: 715: 712: 711: 710: 701: 631: 628: 627: 626: 614: 613: 597: 596: 591: 580: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 473: 469: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 398:ChrisGualtieri 379: 372: 368: 360: 348: 347: 346: 331: 325: 319: 313: 307: 298: 294: 251: 248: 247: 246: 224: 214: 209: 208: 207: 182: 180:History of KFC 177: 176: 175: 146: 139: 137: 136: 131: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4356: 4345: 4341: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4328: 4323: 4312: 4305: 4298: 4290: 4288: 4287: 4283: 4271: 4265: 4259: 4253: 4248: 4245: 4240: 4234: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4208: 4203: 4198: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4171: 4167: 4166: 4162:). Thanks, - 4161: 4157: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4114: 4104: 4096: 4069: 4065: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4038: 4034: 4028: 4027: 4018: 4014: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3995: 3991: 3983: 3981: 3980: 3976: 3969: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3934: 3933: 3928: 3924: 3921: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3909: 3906: 3903: 3900: 3895: 3889: 3887: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3877: 3871: 3868: 3865: 3862: 3860: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3812: 3808: 3805: 3802: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3778: 3774: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3748: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3721: 3717: 3711: 3708: 3704: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3685: 3681: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3646: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3630: 3625: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3602: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3591: 3576: 3568: 3564: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3553: 3546: 3544: 3537: 3532: 3531:Altered Beast 3528: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3516: 3515:Altered Beast 3512: 3511: 3505: 3504: 3500: 3493: 3491: 3483: 3482: 3479: 3476: 3469: 3467: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3444: 3441: 3439: 3434: 3429: 3424: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3390: 3389: 3381: 3377: 3370: 3367: 3361: 3357: 3355: 3350: 3348: 3341: 3340:‎JamesBWatson 3337: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3317: 3315: 3310: 3308: 3300: 3296: 3287: 3279: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3168: 3164: 3157: 3154: 3152: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3125: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3109: 3105: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3064: 3061: 3058: 3054: 3051: 3047: 3044: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3028: 3025: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3005: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2982: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2958: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2928: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2899: 2892: 2888: 2885: 2881: 2878: 2875:, but to the 2874: 2869: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2834: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2784: 2782: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2730: 2722: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2683:that article 2682: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2650: 2645: 2641: 2638: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2563: 2557: 2556: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2538: 2535: 2532: 2529: 2524: 2518: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2494: 2490: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2466: 2464: 2459: 2455: 2448: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2435: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2398: 2393: 2391: 2383: 2375: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2345: 2342: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2281: 2270: 2254: 2250: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2238: 2236: 2231: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2199: 2193: 2189: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2172: 2167: 2160: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2125: 2123: 2118: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2079: 2077: 2072: 2061: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1981:hamiltonstone 1978: 1969: 1966: 1960: 1956: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1903: 1899: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1884:Chiswick Chap 1880: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1870: 1866: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824:Chiswick Chap 1821: 1817: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1802: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1725: 1719: 1715: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1697: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1654: 1649: 1643: 1637: 1633: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1579: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1548: 1547: 1535: 1534: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1454: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1415: 1411: 1406: 1402: 1401:autoconfirmed 1397: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1369: 1365: 1363: 1359: 1353: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1320: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1306: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1269: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1206: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1169: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1150: 1144: 1137: 1131: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1064: 1062: 1054: 1053: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1003: 995: 992: 987: 983: 980: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 948: 945: 938: 928: 921: 917: 914: 911: 907: 903: 900: 899: 898: 897: 893: 889: 880: 870: 866: 862: 858: 855: 852: 851: 850: 847: 842: 838: 833: 829: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 815: 811: 807: 804: 800: 794: 790: 786: 785: 783: 780: 777: 776:for wikipedia 773: 770: 769: 768: 767: 764: 761: 756: 752: 748: 747: 746: 745: 741: 737: 733: 730: 726: 722: 719: 713: 709: 706: 702: 698: 694: 689: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 673: 667: 665: 661: 658: 655: 652: 649: 646: 644:, Palestinian 643: 640: 637: 629: 625: 622: 618: 617: 612: 608: 604: 599: 598: 595: 592: 589: 584: 578: 572: 568: 564: 563:Wasted Time R 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 550: 546: 542: 526: 521: 516: 512: 511: 510: 507: 503: 502: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 487: 483: 479: 474: 470: 467: 466: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 440: 439: 438: 437: 432: 427: 422: 418: 417:Backwardscopy 407: 403: 399: 394: 393: 392: 388: 384: 380: 377: 373: 369: 366: 361: 358: 357: 356: 353: 349: 344: 341:(rather than 340: 336: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 317: 314: 311: 308: 305: 302: 301: 299: 295: 291: 288: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264:that book ... 261: 257: 250:mirror images 249: 245: 242: 238: 237: 236: 235: 230: 223: 213: 210: 206: 203: 199: 198: 197: 196: 192: 188: 181: 178: 174: 171: 167: 166: 165: 164: 160: 155: 140: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4316: 4277: 4163: 4153: 4121: 4017:Suckindiesel 3987: 3970: 3952: 3919: 3904: 3874: 3872: 3869: 3866: 3863: 3856: 3836: 3815: 3810: 3794: 3702: 3697: 3664: 3644: 3627: 3621: 3600: 3580: 3530: 3485: 3452:Sega Meganet 3448:Sega Genesis 3435: 3392: 3385: 3383: 3373: 3353: 3346: 3313: 3306: 3291: 3288:Keep an eye? 3252:TonyTheTiger 3220:TonyTheTiger 3167:TonyTheTiger 3160: 3136:Mary Vaccaro 3130:— Preceding 3126: 3115:Mary Vaccaro 3112: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3088:coverage in 3085: 3070:Mary Vaccaro 3068: 3065: 3062: 3059: 3055: 3052: 3048: 3045: 3033:Mary Vaccaro 3029: 3026: 3023: 3003: 2986: 2932: 2886: 2876: 2872: 2838: 2785: 2777: 2729:TonyTheTiger 2726: 2680: 2655: 2616: 2533: 2467: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2429: 2396: 2389: 2379: 2333: 2312: 2274: 2234: 2229:Seabuckthorn 2212:this article 2208:this article 2187: 2170: 2165:Seabuckthorn 2150:edit history 2121: 2116:Seabuckthorn 2075: 2070:Seabuckthorn 2065: 2046:Ugog Nizdast 2014:Ugog Nizdast 2011: 1973: 1906: 1846: 1811: 1767: 1729: 1678: 1676: 1666: 1658: 1585: 1583: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1456: 1450: 1429: 1413: 1383: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1321: 1310: 1307: 1304: 1267: 1265: 1245: 1215: 1171: 1165: 1125:Add userbox 1101: 1013: 998: 951: 909: 884: 836: 831: 827: 792: 775: 750: 734: 731: 727: 723: 720: 718:Hi Quadell, 717: 696: 692: 668: 633: 593: 537: 520:Talk tonight 431:Talk tonight 414: 375: 364: 342: 338: 297:financially. 290:infrequently 263: 259: 253: 216: 211: 184: 148: 113: 43: 37: 3542:Red Phoenix 3489:Red Phoenix 3465:Red Phoenix 3098:independent 3086:significant 3066:Sincerely, 2965:Thank you! 2867:formatting. 2222:situations. 1913:User:Polbot 1877::-) It's a 1668:Fuck (film) 1594:LittleJerry 1586:Nigersaurus 1410:autochecked 1329:Thank you, 1104:WikiProject 1102:There is a 1017:Earthsphere 1002:Earthsphere 963:Earthsphere 888:Earthsphere 881:Earthshpere 853:Hi Quadell, 788:consumming. 751:enforcement 36:This is an 4224:contact me 4123:Nikkimaria 4060:Any time. 3990:tryptophan 3959:FWiW Bzuk 3577:Ex College 3269:WP:CHICAGO 3237:WP:CHICAGO 3184:WP:CHICAGO 2983:U.S. Grant 2877:nomination 2746:WP:CHICAGO 2656:plain text 2644:WP:Anatomy 2642:, but for 2503:Ammodramus 2471:Ammodramus 2449:Mentorship 2439:reply here 2218:persevere. 2146:GA nominee 2109:GA nominee 1918:EdJohnston 1859:crocodilia 1820:Crocodilia 1732:second FAC 1617:Crocodilia 1590:Crocodilia 1414:implicitly 1246:tremendous 922:, such as 910:notability 638:and people 452:Adele wiki 442:there's a 365:never seen 114:Archive 55 4321:GregJackP 4193:GA Notice 4165:Awardgive 4118:template. 4048:ww2censor 3999:ww2censor 3913:Cas Liber 3757:Coemgenus 3731:Coemgenus 3671:Coemgenus 3645:suspected 3394:Nidhiki05 3273:WP:WAWARD 3241:WP:WAWARD 3188:WP:WAWARD 2989:Coemgenus 2845:Talk page 2781:Help page 2750:WP:WAWARD 2723:Disgraced 2397:(Ping me) 2279:GregJackP 2271:GA review 2191:removed". 2159:this page 2154:this user 1855:crocodile 1851:alligator 1531:decision. 1405:confirmed 1262:Thank you 1110:, called 937:cite news 927:cite book 861:Pluto2012 806:Pluto2012 736:Pluto2012 677:Sepsis II 664:al-Walaja 543:. Cheers 444:biography 4291:Talkback 4220:criteria 4160:nom here 3923:contribs 3835:, which 3440:Barnstar 3144:contribs 3132:unsigned 3090:multiple 2390:Vensatry 1902:WP:RM/TR 1879:Lyrebird 1528:internet 472:straws). 285:, and I 4340:Quadell 4326:Boomer! 4282:Quadell 4183:Quadell 4140:Quadell 4064:Quadell 4033:Quadell 3975:Quadell 3939:Quadell 3843:Quadell 3773:Quadell 3747:Quadell 3716:Quadell 3651:Quadell 3608:Quadell 3563:Quadell 3536:Sega CD 3521:Quadell 3409:Quadell 3330:Quadell 3265:WP:FOUR 3233:WP:FOUR 3202:Quadell 3180:WP:FOUR 3104:Quadell 3010:Quadell 2957:Quadell 2909:WWB Too 2898:Quadell 2873:article 2849:WWB Too 2843:or the 2809:Quadell 2764:Quadell 2742:WP:FOUR 2689:Scapula 2627:Quadell 2592:Quadell 2562:Quadell 2489:Quadell 2416:Quadell 2350:Quadell 2299:Quadell 2284:Boomer! 2249:Quadell 2198:Quadell 2136:Quadell 2099:Quadell 2035:Quadell 1998:Quadell 1955:Quadell 1865:Quadell 1787:Quadell 1754:Quadell 1714:Quadell 1702:Quadell 1632:Quadell 1621:Quadell 1564:Khazar2 1553:Quadell 1526:on the 1520:someone 1504:Khazar2 1476:Quadell 1420:Quadell 1374:Quadell 1358:Quadell 1291:Quadell 1273:Maralia 1252:Quadell 1191:Quadell 1081:Quadell 991:Quadell 944:Quadell 846:Quadell 760:Quadell 705:Quadell 693:against 621:Quadell 603:Khazar2 506:Quadell 352:Quadell 241:Quadell 202:Quadell 170:Quadell 39:archive 4204:Notice 3703:nearly 3212:WP:GAN 2835:C-SPAN 2774:Thanks 2637:WP:MED 2332:Thank 1847:almost 1841:(XXG). 1522:being 1486:Thanks 1106:about 832:thinks 828:thinks 697:toward 630:WP:ARE 515:yeepsi 426:yeepsi 266:Best, 262:create 187:Farrtj 3818:Skarz 3601:quite 3299:WP:AN 3031:1968. 2360:Edge3 2319:Edge3 1770:Edge3 1736:Dan56 1673:WP:FA 1524:wrong 448:Adele 153:Elias 16:< 4238:talk 4127:talk 4052:talk 4003:talk 3963:talk 3917:talk 3881:talk 3876:Cirt 3822:talk 3761:talk 3735:talk 3675:talk 3634:talk 3629:Cirt 3585:czar 3456:Sega 3436:The 3295:here 3218:).-- 3140:talk 3119:talk 3100:.) 3074:talk 3037:talk 2993:talk 2971:talk 2943:talk 2913:Talk 2887:does 2853:Talk 2823:talk 2792:talk 2701:talk 2697:CFCF 2693:WP:N 2681:P.S. 2672:talk 2668:CFCF 2607:talk 2603:CFCF 2580:talk 2576:CFCF 2546:talk 2542:CFCF 2507:talk 2475:talk 2364:talk 2344:best 2323:talk 2188:both 2050:talk 2018:talk 1985:talk 1942:talk 1922:talk 1907:See 1888:talk 1828:talk 1774:talk 1764:GANs 1740:talk 1685:talk 1680:Cirt 1598:talk 1568:talk 1508:talk 1463:talk 1458:Cirt 1436:talk 1431:Cirt 1390:talk 1385:Cirt 1352:this 1340:talk 1335:Cirt 1277:talk 1232:talk 1178:talk 1173:Cirt 1170:, — 1021:talk 1006:talk 967:talk 892:talk 865:talk 837:most 810:talk 740:talk 714:NPoV 700:ban. 681:talk 607:talk 567:talk 549:talk 541:here 496:talk 482:talk 478:JG66 460:talk 402:talk 387:talk 383:JG66 293:you. 272:talk 268:JG66 228:Talk 191:talk 4113:ygm 4108:or 3861:. 3501:on 3387:Toa 3378:of 3347:Zad 3307:Zad 3297:at 3165:.-- 3094:one 3004:you 2917:COI 2857:COI 2617:can 2376:FAC 2341:the 2338:All 2334:you 1861:? 1370:. 1319:. 1050:--> 932:or 446:of 376:him 287:not 56:to 4338:– 4280:– 4267:· 4261:· 4255:· 4216:GA 4202:GA 4181:– 4138:– 4129:) 4116:}} 4110:{{ 4106:}} 4100:{{ 4062:– 4054:) 4031:– 4005:) 3973:– 3965:) 3937:– 3925:) 3883:) 3873:— 3841:– 3824:) 3771:– 3763:) 3745:– 3737:) 3729:-- 3714:– 3698:is 3677:) 3649:– 3643:I 3636:) 3606:– 3561:– 3519:– 3407:– 3354:68 3328:– 3314:68 3271:/ 3267:/ 3263:/ 3259:/ 3239:/ 3235:/ 3231:/ 3227:/ 3200:– 3186:/ 3182:/ 3178:/ 3174:/ 3146:) 3142:• 3121:) 3102:– 3076:) 3039:) 3008:– 2995:) 2973:) 2955:– 2945:) 2919:) 2915:· 2896:– 2859:) 2855:· 2825:) 2807:– 2794:) 2762:– 2748:/ 2744:/ 2740:/ 2736:/ 2703:) 2695:. 2674:) 2639:: 2625:– 2609:) 2590:– 2582:) 2560:– 2548:) 2509:) 2487:– 2477:) 2414:– 2384:. 2366:) 2348:– 2346:, 2325:) 2297:– 2247:– 2196:– 2134:– 2097:– 2052:) 2033:– 2020:) 1996:– 1987:) 1953:– 1944:) 1924:) 1890:) 1863:– 1830:) 1785:– 1776:) 1752:– 1742:) 1734:. 1712:– 1700:– 1687:) 1675:. 1630:– 1600:) 1592:? 1580:GA 1570:) 1551:– 1510:) 1474:– 1465:) 1438:) 1418:– 1392:) 1372:– 1356:– 1342:) 1332:— 1326:. 1289:– 1279:) 1250:– 1234:) 1189:– 1180:) 1146:}} 1140:{{ 1133:}} 1127:{{ 1079:– 1034:.) 1023:) 1008:) 969:) 940:}} 934:{{ 930:}} 924:{{ 894:) 867:) 812:) 742:) 683:) 666:. 609:) 569:) 551:) 498:) 484:) 462:) 404:) 389:) 343:of 339:on 274:) 218:-- 193:) 134:59 129:58 124:57 119:56 109:54 104:53 99:52 94:51 89:50 84:40 79:30 74:20 69:10 4306:. 4241:) 4235:( 4125:( 4050:( 4001:( 3961:( 3920:· 3915:( 3879:( 3820:( 3759:( 3733:( 3673:( 3632:( 3589:♔ 3275:) 3261:C 3257:T 3255:( 3243:) 3229:C 3225:T 3223:( 3190:) 3176:C 3172:T 3170:( 3138:( 3117:( 3072:( 3035:( 2991:( 2969:( 2941:( 2911:( 2851:( 2821:( 2790:( 2752:) 2738:C 2734:T 2732:( 2699:( 2670:( 2605:( 2578:( 2544:( 2505:( 2473:( 2436:| 2386:— 2362:( 2321:( 2235:♥ 2171:♥ 2122:♥ 2076:♥ 2048:( 2016:( 1983:( 1940:( 1920:( 1886:( 1826:( 1772:( 1738:( 1683:( 1596:( 1566:( 1506:( 1461:( 1434:( 1408:" 1388:( 1338:( 1275:( 1230:( 1176:( 1155:. 1148:. 1122:. 1019:( 1004:( 981:. 965:( 890:( 863:( 808:( 738:( 679:( 605:( 565:( 547:( 522:) 518:( 494:( 480:( 458:( 433:) 429:( 400:( 385:( 270:( 231:) 225:( 189:( 158:Z 60:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index