User talk:Quadell/Archive 56

1774:

brings the article to a certain stage. For example, if you aspire to be a Picasso and are working on a painting. You are so much engrossed in your work that it's your life for the time being. Now I, by mistake, spill colours on that painting. You acknowledge that it was purely unintentional and the fact that I'm your very good friend. But you'll still be traumatized like hell. Any person willing to help you should first and foremost calm you down, show empathy and bring smile back to your face, because only then you can take rational decisions and those decisions would be then as good as any great judge that can be entrusted with the task of arbitration. What I mean is, lets try to be ordinary members of a community and acknowledge the fact that we are not bots but humans, and lets not try to be a judge always. These are the times when any author in any such situation needs our so called "wikilove". We are generous with this gesture when a person is already ok, but hesitate a lot when a person needs it the most. It's like serving the dinner when no one is hungry and leaving the table empty when everyone is starving. So this was the essence of what I meant. I don't claim to be right here. It's just an opinion. --

1431:

bound to be breached sooner or later. But yes, I don't endorse sarcasm and bitterness also, although in my real life I'm renowned to have done a PhD in these two fields. I love people who are rude to me, mainly because they hardly ruffle a feather in me. I'm terrified of people like you who are repositories of gentility and all virtues because I must retain them in my life and hence a need for extra caution. I also believe that you should ban civility from your real life, especially personal life involving your close friends, and strive to create an atmosphere conducive for honest discussions with utmost ease and spontaneity. You should rather be more assertive and be not afraid to speak your mind. The kind of person you are, even when you were extremely rude, your words must have been like soft flowers falling on a person with a rather increased speed

3328:! Articles of specific interest are always tricky, since I'm not 100% clear on the boundary between how much background information can be assumed and how much explanation is necessary in the article. Often, a specialist in a given topic will take for granted a familiarity with persons and events that a typical en.wiki reader will not share. Some of those assumptions are valid, and others are not. (I've also found that some specialists are happy to see the perspective of an outsider, or nonspecialist, such as myself, and improve the article greatly by briefly introducing concepts necessary to fully appreciate the article. Others are quite resistant.) 1639:. I was about to review it when I saw this. I want to help Dana. Although she is very experienced, but no one likes to be yelled at. I want to make sure that she does not feel an undue pressure because of this. Can you please advice? Give me details as to what should be my exact next step if I were to interfere at all. What do you think should be the best strategy in such situations in terms of outcomes? I mean Dana must feel that I'm trying to help her. I was thinking of posting something like "I also could not find any typos in this article". Just to form a consensus. Would she welcome my interference? -- 3332:"writer" and "writings" sections, and having an "importance" section (as if his life and writings were not part of his importance.) In addition, many of the questions you ask in your review are the sorts of questions most readers would have. The article does not, of course, have to explain the entire history of Poland and the Reformation; but if Skarga's importance can't be understood without knowing the power balance between king and szlachta, for instance, then that relationship has to be touched on enough to edify the casual reader. 1334: 1614:

appreciated while I'm active here. (By the way, I know it may not seem like it, but I really am trying to take my Wikibreak seriously. With few exceptions, I'm only responding to issues that are brought to my attention and where my assistance is requested. I feel bad that there are so many worthy FACs and GANs and AFCs that could use attention, but won't be able to jump in and help until my class ends and life settles down a bit.) Thank you again, o bestower of jewels.

1569: 3519:

status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content", so I suppose it's necessary for GA reviewers to know whether a copyright tag is correct or if a rationale is valid. This is a tricky balance. On the one hand, we don't want to put such a burden on GA reviewers that no one wants to do the work. On the other hand, we don't want to promote articles to GA status that clearly do not pass criterion 6a. Thanks for bringing this up.

1689:. It seems there is another user, not new, but hardly of any contributions, who appears to be giving her a hard time. This article may have stability issues. What do you say? Also refer talk page of Dana and my message there. What baffles me is that, how easily new users can derail the whole process and discourage a hard working and sincere author like Dana, and I can do nothing but watch. Am I judging it objectively? Feel free to correct me. -- 31: 2128: 2535: 2344: 3125: 2415: 1283: 324: 3496:

reviews later regarding a Fair use image. Since a good portion of new recruits would be like me and know nothing about licensing, don't you think giving them a crash course in it would be a good idea in the future? All I did was read the GACR and not understand most of the part related to images. While reviewing, I checked what I thought were legit-looking licenses.

2709:

not be deleted. It's possible that some would be better off merged into genus articles, especially if the information in each species article is nearly identical, but I suppose that would depend on the specific case. I don't remember any discussion on merges. I'm always pleased when I see additional information added to a species stub that Polbot made. All the best,

1749: 1482: 1435: 1392: 791: 1742: 1442: 1399: 2188: 3264:. Once OTRS reviews the e-mail, they will know whether the permission given is sufficient for Knowledge (XXG) or not. If the evidence of permission is not forwarded to OTRS, the photo should be deleted... but it would certainly be polite to let the uploader know first and give him a chance before tagging it for deletion. All the best, 2065: 3352:

Thanks for your thoughts on this—I appreciate the advice of someone who's got much more experience than I as a GA reviewer. Since you haven't posted on the review page, I assume that you'd rather not officially join the discussion. Would you object to my mentioning this conversation there, or would

3331:

In this specific case, I would not grant GA status on the article unless many changes are made. Many of the paragraphs are one or two sentences, including in the lead section. The lead section does not adequately summarize all sections of the article. The organization is questionable, having separate

3047:

graciously informed me about the PD thing, and now I'm here to try and improve my script be filtering out as many of those PD URLs as I can. As such, I'm wondering if you could tell me how Polbot decided which sources to make pages from. If all of the pages made by Polbot came from PD sources, then

2708:

Greetings. Polbot made those species (and genus) articles 6 or 7 years ago. Since then, a few have been fleshed out into GAs, but many others have remained stubs. Occasionally one will be nominated for deletion, although in every case that I can recall the community consensus was that the stub should

1430:

I took sometime in finding right words to convey my thoughts to you regarding this. In fact, I felt very happy to know that you were such. But at the same time felt sad at knowing that you "try not to, nowadays". I believe that civility should never be a dam on a flooded river of frustration which is

1672:

Then again, if you don't say anything, it'll probably work itself out. In the worst case scenario, the reviewer will fail the nomination for questionable reasons, and Dana will simply renominate it. Then she'll probably get a better reviewer next time. But if you want to say something, just say that

976:

I have blocked for 24 hours. (I think "broadly construed" indicates that talk pages are included, given the nature of the initial complaint.) AngusWOOF, I recommend you not interact with him in any way. Simply leave him alone, and report to an admin if he violates the topic ban again. All the best,

3234:

Please would you kindly give me your opinion on the current licence for this image? I have been reviewing an article containing this image for DYK, and I am unhappy about it - but I cannot understand how or why it has a move-to-commons template on it and how or why it hasn't been tagged FD. I have

3095:

The sources for those articles were first published by the United States Congress, and any creation of the United States goverment is in the public domain everywhere in the world. Unfortunately, determining what material is and isn't PD is a tremendously difficult exercise. I recommend "The Public

1738:

I saw your response on the talk page. It's perfect. I think it should resolve the issue now. I'm glad you took a calm and composed decision. I'd have surely done something rash. Congratulations for the accolade below. The user has done a great job in putting our feelings for you into words which I

3518:

I think that's very solid advice. Image licensing (along with correct fair use rationales) is such a tricky, complex, and exception-filled area of Knowledge (XXG) policy that it's no wonder so many users have trouble with it. The GA criteria do require that "images are tagged with their copyright

3335:

In the end, remember that passing or failing a GAN is not that big a deal. Piotrus has nominated many, many articles for GA and FA status; some have passed, and others have not. If your review aids in the improvement of the article, that is more important, in my opinion, than the outcome. All the

1721:

So what can you do? It can help to look over the different version and recent changes, and give your own views of what's best for the article (in a constructive way). This can be very valuable for achieving consensus. It's important not to take sides or assume that one editor is always right, but

786:

Thank you very much. The credit is all yours. I merely followed your guidance and advice. Thanks a lot for your meticulous mentoring. It's been really enlightening to work with you. Truely speaking, my heart is heavy. There is no happiness at all but a lot of reminiscence, nostalgia and wonderful

3495:

Hey there, old mentor. I see that sadly, the GA recruitment is not as active as it used to be but I came here to give you some constructive feedback. While I was part of the program, I think it would have been nice if you mentioned the basics of image licensing. I did make a blunder in one of my

2998:

When I logged in to check on the automated message posted to my account (like the one you got, above), I again noticed the msg that you left me last year saying hi, and so I'm back, saying hi again again--sometimes I really miss the community here on WP, but I've SOOOO gone on to other obsessive

2691:. Many of them are quite short, and some (not me) would argue it's be better to simply merge them into the genus articles. Did the community ever reach a consensus not to delete/merge Polbot's very short articles? Has anyone suggested they should be deleted or merged? Thanks a lot for the info.-- 2273:

Hey Q. Firstly, I want to add my congratulations & thanks to those above for your fantastic work reviewing articles last year. Secondly, I want to say how much I missed your insightful comments in GARs while you were away. And thirdly, I'd like to ask a favour … (Ain't that always the way?!)

1613:

You are too kind, Gerda! Well you have made my January! Though we've rarely interacted, I feel like you know me quite well. Too often we wait until Wikipedians retire to tell them how much we appreciate their efforts and contributions; thank you for taking the time to make me feel recognized and

1465:

You make some good points. Honestly, I'm much more careful with my words when I'm on Knowledge (XXG) (or any public, online forum) than I am in person. I remember my mother telling me, "Don't ever write anything down that you wouldn't want the whole world to see." And on Knowledge (XXG), I write

1375:

Thanks for your advice regarding having only one open review at any particular time. It's working wonders. I reached that point after a lot of hurdles and restraint. But finally I'm there. I had one curious doubt. I thought I'd ask you. For how may seconds were you rude to anyone in your entire

1773:

Why can't we be human? Because then the vocabulary of discourse would be compassion, empathy, sympathy, forgiveness, patience and love. Lets not be a judge. We can then ignore the parameters of being bias or taking sides. Lets understand the situation of an author who through an arduous journey

1709:

Oh, you mean Noodleki? Yes, it is a common source of conflict when users have different opinions on what material should be included in an article, and this can make it difficult for articles to achieve (and maintain) a high level of quality. All quality content providers have to deal with this

1426:

I have, I'm sad to say, been rude to people, certainly. There were times that I've been sarcastic and bitter, but it usually made my life worse. (I alienated people who could have been helpful to me.) If you look closely enough through my history here, you'll find times I insulted people or was

1158:, when I noticed someone else has posted the review. But GAN page shows "Snuffy's Parents Get a Divorce ... Christine (Figureskatingfan) ... being reviewed (additional comments are welcome). Seabuckthorn" Can you please advice me on this? I noticed it after completing the review on the article 2893:

Hi, My name is feeling fancy free (not really, but whatever) and I just started editing on wikipedia, and would like to be recruited to review articles for "Good Article" status. I looked over some of the articles that you've reviewed, and we may have some similar interests, such as Hebrew,

1582:, for good articles and reviews, help with articles for creation and for new users, and for doing more during your "break" than others do in a year, including: "I remember my mother telling me, 'Don't ever write anything down that you wouldn't want the whole world to see.'" and a fair 1874: 1870: 2946:

I haven't closed a BAG request in several years, and I'm not up-to-date with the latest procedures and customs. I wouldn't be a good choice to step in and decide on requests at this time, at least not until I get some time to look over the issues and latest consensus for things.

1970: 1952: 2281:. Early days yet, but I can't see that anyone's addressed requests on that page for 10 days or so – meaning, I don't hold much hope. As an admin, would you be able to intercede there? Completely understand if it's not your field and/or you'd rather not. I'd like to get 396: 864:. I mentioned one WTW issue. I wasn't sure about it but since the nominator is very good and friendly, I took the liberty. Can you please check this issue and also the image checkpoints there? We haven't had much discussion about GA 6 so I'm not sure. -- 660: 3412:

here at en.wikipedia because the file was already at Commons. Unfortunately, we never recorded the author of that file over at Commons! Could you please tell me which source and author were indicated on the file page here at en.wikipedia then? Thanks!

509:

Yes, it's "he joined the U.S. Army" as a named proper noun, but "he joined the army" is not capitalized. Similarly, "I saw Grandmother", but "I saw my grandmother". I really should have explained, instead of just reverting; I didn't mean to be rude.

3048:

I can look for that hidden comment in the html and tell my script to just ignore those pages (or note that the content was placed there by Polbot and is probably in the PD. Thanks for any help you can offer on this topic at all. Happy editing! —

2225: 2205: 2180: 263: 2561:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2370:

1809:

Please update your totals and continue to do so until February 1. If the status of a review is under review or on hold according to the backlog page, even though the article may have passed/failed, it will not count towards your final total.

2874:

I'm afraid I don't think I'm the best choice to peer review it. I don't know nearly as much about the album than many others, and wouldn't know if important facets are missing. I hope it gets an adequate peer review this time. All the best,

184:

I am still working on putting together a statement of principles in attempt to make the process smoother in general. But anything I put together will be voluntary. It would have no affect on NFCR outcomes, especially ones already open.

3302:, which I'm currently reviewing? The nominator/principal editor and I seem to have reached an impasse; and since he's got much more experience than I have at both writing and reviewing GAs, I'm hesitant to insist on my position. 3250:

Currently, this image is in violation of our copyright policy, but it should be easy to resolve. The uploader (who said "Evidence: Will be provided on request.") needs to forward the e-mail where he received permission to OTRS

2856: 1660:

In my opinion, it appears that Hawkturnal is new at reviewing and is not very good at communicating. Dana seems to be taking it well, though. If you choose to say something there, you could try saying something like this:

2607: 1519:

Finally, the kudos you got from TonyTheTiger are exceptional, and you should be proud. Not everyone gets that sort of praise from him; in fact, it's quite rare. It makes me proud to have been your mentor. All the best,

2235: 674:

For your unflinching commitment to etiquettes, civility and politeness amidst all the tensions and conflicts, I express my gratitude to you on behalf of entire Knowledge (XXG) community with this very small accolade.

2565:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2374:

1203:

Honestly, it's very hard to follow what reviews happened when for that page! I think something got moved or deleted somewhere, and I'm not sure how. Anyway, I'm glad you figured it out and provided a good review.

1532:

The credit is all yours. The mistakes are all mine. Thank you very much for being always there for me. As I've said it before, I'm saying it again and I'll always say it again and again, that you've been truely

816:

I'm very glad that it has been a productive mentorship, and I'll be happy to work with you on reviews and article improvement in the future. (Though it may have to wait until I have time again.) All the best,

573: 1961: 1947: 3078:

I came across her in a congressional biographical article, but am interested in all articles and as to whether or not it might be safe to note all of her pages as "safe, likely PD". Thanks! :D —

1587: 3062:

Greetings. Copyright violations are a serious problem on Knowledge (XXG), and I'm grateful for the creation of tools to help deal with the problem. As to your specific question, Polbot performed

1381: 1376:

life? Is sec an appropriate unit? Do we need microsecond or even nanosecond? Another update from my side is, for the first time I passed an article without keeping it on hold. Here is that

1516:

happen. Dana Boomer is a very experienced article writer, and I would expect that her nominations would require few, if any, improvements. I don't think you made any mistake when passed it.

277:

I award you this very special barnstar to honour your meticulous mentoring and guidance to others. Thank you very much for being a very special mentor, friend and a fellow Wikipedian to me

3522:

By the way, I have a great deal of experience with both copyright law and Knowledge (XXG) image policy, so if questions come up that you're unsure how to handle, feel free to contact me.

2511:

Thanks. I think that stub was up to 2004-standards when I made it, but it looks like no one has added any info or sources in the intervening decade, so I suppose it's not that important.

1806:

Hi everyone, I've noticed that a few of you haven't updated your totals as several reviews have passed but on the backlog page, it still says that the article is under review or on hold.

1466:

things down for the whole world to see nearly every day! But when I'm in a private space around friends, I'm much more likely to try out ideas, be spontaneous, go too far, and apologize.

373:

Wow, how unexpected! I just reviewed whatever articles seemed interesting, and it seems I guess I stumbled upon several military history topics that caught my fancy. Glad to help!

2558: 2434:

No assertion of notability; company existed, but there are no reliable sources which discuss the company in detail. There are ebay listings, and a blog, but little else. Fails

576:

the link to the reassessment page about the Eminem album. I think it should be closed since there have been nearly two months since it was opened. Thanks and happy Holidays.--

1877:

so I figured I would inform you of this. The previous attempts have failed due to lack of discussion, so if you have the time you input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,

1377: 1745:. Btw, devoting half an hour to WP doesn't mean you aren't taking your wikibreak seriously. I'm sure you deliberately and out of humility misinterpreted the accolade below. 1339:

Please accept this as a small token of my appreciation. Once again, thank you for your patience in the GA recruitment, and I'm proud to have graduated under your guidance.

581: 1862: 1855: 2367: 333: 2999:

things. Like Facebook. Which isn't nearly as useful to the world at large, but where I can complain about it and don't feel like I should do anything about it. ;-)

218: 2262: 2198: 758:

I've seen your tips. They are very good. This review will be a bit more challenging that I anticipated initially. Hence I'll take some time in working it out. --

2234:

has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the

577: 2547: 2356: 3096:

Domain: How to Find & Use Copyright-Free Writings, Music, Art & More" by Stephen Fishman for a good introduction to the difficulties involved.

1579: 3188: 2482: 1155: 2928: 2032:

Hey! How you doing lately? Connection is very slow, so I would really appreciate if you reply at my talk page. I miss a lot Knowledge (XXG) :( --

1445:

With your current approach of "try not to", I'm scared and worried you may enter, God forbid, into some kind of "depression" sooner or later. --

2750: 214: 3523: 1059:

Sorry to interrupt your wikibreak, he posted a few more edits. He originally posted on topic on my talk page but pulled it after I warned him

1667:: I'm a GA reviewer as well. I looked over the article, and I don't see obvious spelling or grammar errors. I hope this is helpful feedback. 1277: 342:

For reviewing seven MILHIST Good article nominations during the period October to December 2013, I am pleased to award you the Wikistripes.

2984: 2258: 1823: 1591: 829:

Sure, I'll wait. Take your time. In the mean time, concentrate hard on the tasks you are occupied with, so that you are done in no time. --

787:

memories. I strongly feel we should have a policy on WP to make it compulsory for every mentor like you, not to graduate your mentees ever

2972: 3228: 1726:. It's quite possible that the issue is now resolved, and there will be no stability problems for the GAN review. At least, I hope so. 3192: 2486: 2817: 2746: 718: 359: 2980: 2254: 1819: 1152: 542:

Thanks for the excellent review. I can honestly say that it was among the best I have ever received. Enjoy your break. Cheers!

2819:, which is over there languishing? I would muchly appreciate it. And let me know how I can assist you, of course. Thanks. 3180: 3136: 3114: 2474: 2426: 2404: 1841:

I don't think that's true. My reviews were all closed by the end of January. Is there one in particular you think I missed?

928:

Anyway, you asked to keep you informed if Dcelano broke the topic ban. I'll just refer you to his contributions for proof.

410:

For your selfless devotion and diligence in the pursuit of helping others and bringing in a positive change in their lives.

494:

Hi Quadell. Why did you revert my edit on the Jimi Hendrix article? Is there a reason why "Army" shouldn't be capitalized?

2862:

and I would appreciate any comments and/or suggestions you have for improving the article in preparation for FAC. Cheers!

2278: 950:

Well he probably doesn't know if the topic ban pertains to talk pages. He is posting more forum chat stuff on my page and

885:

I see that it's been resolved. I think your WTW concerns were insightful, and I'm glad to see they were quickly improved.

3503:

and observed sample articles. Now I even uploaded a few images from Flickr and a non-free game screenshot. Warm regards,

3184: 2478: 637:

Wow! I really like the way you handled this review! Very thorough. It looks like you took care of everything. Well done!

3409: 955: 613: 133: 128: 123: 113: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 2551: 2360: 2222:

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

1923: 1396:

And finally, I'm checking the list of recruiters everyday in the hope that I see "Available" again against your name.

2648:

I want to learn how to make good article nomination reviews. Can you teach me how? It would be greatly appreciated!

2899: 2824: 2246: 1423:

Thank you for your continuing GAN work! You are getting a reputation as a very thorough and knowledgeable reviewer.

1159: 940: 861: 38: 2140:

For reaching your goal to review at least 21 Good article nominations during the December 2013 GAN Backlog Drive!

1813:

For those that made pledges during the drive, the final donation amount will be determined sometime in February.

1027: 722: 2286: 1710:

situation eventually; it's a side-effect of Knowledge (XXG) being "the 💕 that anyone can edit". Policies like

1333: 1298: 1234: 301:

Wow, thank you very much for the recognition! It's always gratifying to help a new reviewer learn the ropes.

3063: 2658: 2461: 1886: 1385: 1223: 228: 1197: 1177: 3508: 2727: 2697: 2617: 1781: 1760: 1696: 1646: 1602: 1544: 1493: 1452: 1409: 1344: 1189: 1169: 904: 871: 836: 802: 765: 732: 682: 623: 527: 499: 417: 347: 284: 3196: 2490: 1715: 3281: 3258: 3240: 2895: 2820: 2242: 936: 3066:

over her lifespan. Are you referring to the Congressional biography articles, or the species articles?

2931:

that are awaiting BAG assistance. Would you be willing to look at some of these? Thanks in advance!

2603: 2894:

synagogues, and my favorite "anything." I hope you have the time to help me become a reviewer. Thanks.

234: 3478: 3418: 3384: 3358: 3314: 2936: 1636: 3149:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

2816:

Hi Quadell, hope all is well with you. Favor to ask: would you mind taking a look at my latest FAC

2443:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

2435: 476:

I'm very happy for you! Thanks for all the excellent article improvement you do on Knowledge (XXG).

168: 2043: 1583: 1578:

Thank you, lover of "reliable, neutral, and free" from the beginning, for quality articles such as

1292: 1287: 1228: 1182:

Ha ha! Sorry the link I accessed was of 2009. A silly mistake. Well, that's my habit. Apologies. --

1123: 1092: 1035: 963: 610: 153: 1971:

Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1

1953:

Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1

3450: 2654: 2575: 2542: 2526: 2502: 2422: 2408: 1879: 462: 223: 1568: 3504: 3163: 3081: 3051: 2722: 2692: 2611: 2457: 1919: 1776: 1755: 1691: 1641: 1598: 1539: 1488: 1447: 1404: 1340: 1184: 1164: 899: 866: 858: 831: 797: 760: 727: 677: 618: 523: 495: 412: 343: 279: 175: 47: 17: 3306: 2231: 1722:

instead, comment on the content to help resolve the conflict. I've attempted to do that with

925:...Because this truly is the most important thing that's going on in my life right now! ;) 164: 3456: 3277: 3236: 3167: 2149: 2088: 1686: 951: 210: 3500: 3150: 2444: 1866: 1711: 1384:. It's by Dana. I hope I've not committed any mistake. You may also want to check this one 213:

which has now been promoted to a featured article. I have nominated it as a candidate for

206: 3474: 3414: 3380: 3354: 3325: 3310: 3204: 2976: 2965:

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by

2932: 2785: 2758: 2380: 3036: 3032: 1262: 2321: 2294: 2127: 2079:

For reviewing 22 Good article nominations during the December 2013 GAN Backlog Drive!--

2034: 2015: 1986: 1273: 1266: 1119: 1088: 1031: 959: 932: 699:

That's certainly my goal. Glad to know I've been at least somewhat successful in this.

149: 1685:

I'll try to explain the situation to you. Take a look at the talk page of the article

395: 3004: 2568: 2495: 2351: 2335: 455: 3453:, who was in the Peruvian Navy, but who blanked his page back in 2006. He tagged it 1969:

Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at

929: 3533: 3529: 3512: 3482: 3468: 3464: 3432: 3422: 3388: 3374: 3370: 3362: 3343: 3339: 3318: 3299: 3285: 3271: 3267: 3244: 3221: 3217: 3208: 3103: 3099: 3086: 3073: 3069: 3056: 3020: 3016: 3007: 2988: 2954: 2950: 2940: 2916: 2912: 2903: 2882: 2878: 2868: 2841: 2837: 2828: 2801: 2797: 2789: 2775: 2771: 2762: 2732: 2716: 2712: 2702: 2676: 2672: 2662: 2634: 2630: 2621: 2591: 2587: 2578: 2518: 2514: 2505: 2397: 2393: 2384: 2325: 2311: 2307: 2298: 2250: 2173: 2169: 2157: 2112: 2108: 2096: 2050: 2019: 2003: 1999: 1990: 1936: 1927: 1907: 1903: 1894: 1848: 1844: 1827: 1789: 1768: 1733: 1729: 1704: 1680: 1676: 1654: 1621: 1617: 1606: 1552: 1527: 1523: 1501: 1473: 1469: 1460: 1417: 1364: 1360: 1348: 1318: 1314: 1305: 1282: 1254: 1250: 1241: 1211: 1207: 1140: 1136: 1127: 1109: 1105: 1096: 1053: 1049: 1039: 984: 980: 967: 944: 912: 892: 888: 879: 844: 824: 820: 810: 773: 753: 749: 740: 706: 702: 690: 644: 640: 631: 598: 594: 585: 561: 557: 548: 531: 517: 513: 503: 483: 479: 470: 441: 437: 425: 380: 376: 351: 308: 304: 292: 247: 243: 192: 188: 179: 171: 157: 3035:, and using the script (before I knew that things from us.gov websites are in the 2753:

too. (Is it not the norm to undelete the talk page when a page is undeleted?) --

2224:

There is a backlog of over 1500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the

1087:

I've reverted his changes for unsourced. I'll let you know when it gets severe. -

3309:. If you can spare the time, I'd greatly value your opinion on this. Thanks-- 3252: 3132: 3118: 3040: 2863: 2688: 2282: 2141: 2080: 1931: 1836: 1632: 659: 543: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3200: 3031:

Hello there! I'm working on creating a userscript to assist users in finding

2781: 2754: 2376: 262: 3473:

Thank you muchly for the prompt, extensive and precise answer. All the best,

3173:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2780::) So is it the norm to undelete the talk page when a page is undeleted? -- 2467:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1996:

I'm afraid I don't have the time right now, but I wish you the best of luck!

1900:

I'm afraid I don't have the time right now, but I wish you the best of luck!

2317: 2290: 2289:– but it's no great priority for me. See you at the next GAN, I hope. Best, 2010: 1981: 795:. But honestly, it's been a pleasure and privilege working with you here. -- 452:

Hi, the article has passed FAC. Thank you so much for the excellent review!

3305:

I won't describe our disagreement, lest I put myself on the wrong side of

323: 3044: 3000: 935:

to harass, too. Sigh. Thanks again for your assistance in this matter.

1439:. So don't worry and be rude, at least with me. Try me! I challenge you. 1311:

And thank you for being a part of this Million-Award-worthy GAN review!

3298:

As my quondam GA-review mentor, would you be willing to take a look at

3235:

never tagged for FD yet, and I don't want to make a mistake. Thanks. --

2967: 2687:

Hello. I've had a look at quite a few species articles created by your

2608:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Tadeusz Kościuszko/archive2

1046:

Okay, blocked for 48 hours this time. Next time it will be for 4 days.

958:

but when I bite back and mention how irrelevant it is, he deletes it. -

3027:

Ran into a friend of yours the other day, and I have some questions...

2181:

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive

2105:

Thanks! I'm very glad to have been a part of such a valuable project.

1741: 1441: 1398: 3440: 3214:

Thanks for letting me know. The issue seems to have resolved itself.

2187: 2064: 1026:

I had to revert some of his stuff, but he is hitting a related page

616:. To ensure I've not committed any mistake, can you please check? -- 167:. Modernist has made a point to edit war against the outcome citing 146: 1512:

It is rare that I pass a GAN without requiring any changes, but it

2316:

Thanks for your support. I'm sure it'll add weight to my request.

2909:

I would love to, but I'm afraid I don't have the time right now.

2606:

article has again been nominated for FA. Opinions are needed at

2277:

I recently submitted a request at the Spam-whitelist regarding a

1222:

Sorry to have kept you waiting. I've replied to your changes at

1739:

always tried to give a best shot at but always failed miserably

3526:

can sometimes be an excellent resource as well. All the best,

2238:. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. 2215:

the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from

25: 3499:

Don't worry about me, after that incident, I thoroughly read

1962:

Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties

1948:

Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties

3123: 2413: 2186: 1357:

You are very kind. Thanks for helping with the GAN backlog!

2546:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2355:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

52:

This archive page covers comments 2751-2800, from roughly

2559:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Maco (toy company)

3353:

you prefer not to be brought into it to that extent? —

3191:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2540:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2485:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2349:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1723: 1116: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1067: 1060: 1030:

where he is potentially annoying a third contributor. -

1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 717:

Please take a look at the review I'm going to post for

3461:

when he uploaded it in October of 2006. All the best,

3156:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2450:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2285:

up to scratch, because I think the article belongs on

931:

It took him all of one day! And he's moved onto poor

1802:

WikiProject Good Articles December 2013 Backlog Drive

1718:

make the problem better, but they don't eliminate it.

163:

Actually it is just me implementing the closure of a

2602:

This is a general notice to previous reviewers: The

2368:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Anti-war film

1062:

which is okay but then he's moved on and did these:

356:

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste

2794:Not sure, but I didn't see a problem in this case. 2669:I'm afraid I don't have the time right now. Sorry! 3229:File:Eduardo Garcia post-injury in the kitchen.jpg 145:can you please mediate - the craziness has begun: 1863:2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game 1856:2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game 2741:Undelete talk pages too, when undeleting, please 1673:it's an outside opinion, and it should be fine. 217:. If you wish, you can support that nomination 2279:Gary Wright interview on smashing interview.com 725:. Feel free to make any modifications there. -- 3379:Thanks—your opinion is greatly appreciated. — 3491:GA recruitment: Teaching about image licenses 8: 2584:I pretty much had my say above on this one. 1388:, especially by T3. Any clue what he means? 1290:for comments about the article. Well done! 3367:Oh, it's no problem. Mention all you want. 2390:It looks that that case sorted itself out. 2166:The self-goal was a good motivator for me. 1102:Yep, that's unambiguous. 4 days this time. 2073:The Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit 3524:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 2548:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 2357:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 2062: 1580:United States Declaration of Independence 651:For your steadfast adherence to civility! 522:Okay, I get it now. Thanks for replying! 393: 321: 260: 3013:I hear ya, Elf. Thanks for stopping by. 2975:is very much appreciated. Many thanks. 3162:notice, but please explain why in your 2456:notice, but please explain why in your 3435:AS332F1 Super Puma helicopter in BACH 2751:File_talk:Jerry_Rosenberg_1424049c.jpg 1133:Thanks. Blocked for 1 week this time. 657: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1146: 254:A barnstar for your mentoring skills! 7: 3428:Sure. The original description was: 3254:), and then the image can be tagged 1746: 1479: 1432: 1427:rude... but I try not to, nowadays. 1389: 788: 2927:Hi Quadell! There are quite a few 2598:Tadeusz Kościuszko nominated for FA 2008:Okay, no worries, and thank you! — 1918:There is a discussion taking place 387:A very small token of appreciation! 3410:File:Cougar chile unitas 47-06.JPG 3151:deleted for any of several reasons 3139:because of the following concern: 2445:deleted for any of several reasons 2429:because of the following concern: 1151:I was about to post my review for 1081:forum-like on topics my talk page 24: 2747:File:Jerry_Rosenberg_1424049c.jpg 2557:The article will be discussed at 2366:The article will be discussed at 2263:WikiProject Articles for creation 1861:Hello, I have recently nominated 334:Military history reviewers' award 2533: 2342: 2126: 2063: 1747: 1740: 1567: 1480: 1440: 1433: 1397: 1390: 1332: 1281: 789: 658: 394: 322: 261: 200: 29: 2217:March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014 2033: 1873:. You were a commenter on the 1153:Snuffy's Parents Get a Divorce 1147:Snuffy's Parents Get a Divorce 148:sorry to bother you, thanks... 1: 2251:02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 2211:The goal of this drive is to 2174:13:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 2113:13:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 3401:We lost the author of a file 2821:Christine (Figureskatingfan) 2158:14:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 2097:14:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 2051:23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 2020:05:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC) 2004:20:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 1991:01:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 1937:20:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 1908:20:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 1895:00:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 1849:21:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1828:21:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1790:06:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC) 1769:17:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 1734:13:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 1705:02:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 1681:18:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 1655:18:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 1631:Take a look at this article 1622:13:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 1607:12:34, 18 January 2014 (UTC) 1592:12 August 2007, what a poem! 1553:18:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 1528:14:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 1502:15:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 1474:13:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 1461:21:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 1418:22:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 1365:14:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 1349:15:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 1319:13:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 1306:19:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 1255:15:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 1247:Excellent. I replied there. 1242:01:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 1212:15:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 1141:23:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 1128:21:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 1118:and the same talk places. - 1110:18:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 1097:17:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 956:Talk:The Wiggles videography 937:Christine (Figureskatingfan) 240:Thanks for letting me know. 3408:Five years ago you deleted 3195:allows discussion to reach 3176:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3159:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2749:long ago. Please undelete 2645:Hi, this is Vinethemonkey, 2489:allows discussion to reach 2470:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2453:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1924:File:Jimihendrix1969mug.jpg 1922:regarding the inclusion of 1575:declaration of independence 1198:22:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 1178:22:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 1054:18:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 1040:18:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 985:19:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 968:19:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 945:19:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 913:18:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 893:14:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 880:18:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 845:18:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 825:14:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 811:19:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 774:18:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 754:14:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 741:03:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 707:14:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 691:19:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 645:17:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 632:17:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 599:14:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 586:14:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 562:14:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 554:Truly, it was my pleasure. 549:21:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 532:16:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 518:21:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 504:15:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 484:16:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 471:08:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 442:16:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 426:19:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 381:15:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 352:07:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 309:20:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 293:19:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 248:16:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC) 235:17:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 193:23:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 180:22:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 158:22:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 3550: 3534:17:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 3513:15:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 3449:The original uploader was 3187:exist. In particular, the 2981:MediaWiki message delivery 2904:11:04, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 2883:12:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC) 2869:21:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC) 2842:11:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC) 2834:Got it. A very good read. 2829:17:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC) 2802:11:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 2790:03:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 2776:18:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 2768:No problem. All the best, 2763:17:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 2733:13:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 2717:13:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 2703:12:51, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 2677:12:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC) 2635:17:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC) 2622:01:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC) 2592:17:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC) 2579:16:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC) 2519:18:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 2506:16:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 2481:exist. In particular, the 2398:18:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 2255:MediaWiki message delivery 1820:MediaWiki message delivery 1586:, - repeating: you are an 857:I've posted my review for 609:I've posted my review for 3483:14:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 3469:13:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 3443:47-06 - Mejillones, Chile 3423:12:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 3389:00:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 3375:23:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 3363:23:18, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 3181:proposed deletion process 3104:23:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 3087:22:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 3074:21:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 3057:19:22, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 2929:Requests for bot approval 2663:15:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 2475:proposed deletion process 2385:01:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 2326:01:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 2312:15:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 2299:15:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC) 2206:Backlog Elimination Drive 2125: 2069: 1976:Thank you for your time, 1028:Talk:Carols in the Domain 664: 404:The Barnstar of Diligence 400: 328: 267: 3344:17:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 3319:17:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC) 3286:13:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 3272:11:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 3245:11:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 3222:17:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 3209:01:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC) 3043:'s pages for deletion. 3021:17:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 3008:16:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 2989:06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) 2550:or whether it should be 2359:or whether it should be 2304:I have commented there. 2287:Template:George Harrison 1958:I've listed the article 1076:Wiggly Wiggly Christmas 997:Sorry, he's at it again: 746:I have commented there. 215:Today's featured article 201:Today's featured article 3168:the article's talk page 2955:17:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 2941:23:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC) 2917:17:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC) 2462:the article's talk page 2056:GAN Backlog Drive Award 1942:Fuck peer review, again 1021:Christine's talk page: 360:WPMILHIST Review alerts 3276:Thank you. Will do. -- 3128: 2855:Hi, Quadell. I've put 2745:Thanks for undeleting 2418: 2191: 434:You are far too kind. 3193:articles for deletion 3137:proposed for deletion 3127: 3064:a number of functions 2923:BAG assistance needed 2487:articles for deletion 2427:proposed for deletion 2417: 2230:A new version of our 2190: 1818:Sent by Dom497 using 668:The Civility Barnstar 315:Well done and thanks! 205:You took part in the 42:of past discussions. 3144:Not a notable person 2889:Will you recruit me? 2134:The Special Barnstar 1380:and the review page 1011:The Wiggly Big Show 271:The Special Barnstar 2961:Request for comment 2119:A barnstar for you! 1288:Talk:United Nations 1276:you nominated as a 1115:He's going nuts on 611:Ontario Highway 136 605:Ontario Highway 136 3185:deletion processes 3129: 3039:) I tagged one of 2604:Tadeusz Kościuszko 2543:Maco (toy company) 2527:Maco (toy company) 2479:deletion processes 2423:Maco (toy company) 2419: 2409:Maco (toy company) 2192: 1966:for peer review. 1588:awesome Wikipedian 1325:A cupcake for you! 364:to your user space 3115:Proposed deletion 2860:up at peer review 2405:Proposed deletion 2265: 2232:AfC helper script 2163: 2162: 2102: 2101: 2046: 2040: 1830: 1354: 1353: 1066:Yule Be Wiggling 1016:Talk:The Wiggles 859:Hanlon Expressway 853:Hanlon Expressway 696: 695: 431: 430: 370: 369: 365: 298: 297: 64: 63: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Quadell 3541: 3532: 3467: 3460: 3373: 3342: 3270: 3263: 3257: 3220: 3178: 3177: 3161: 3160: 3126: 3102: 3085: 3072: 3055: 3019: 2971:. Your comments 2970: 2953: 2915: 2896:Feelingfancyfree 2881: 2866: 2840: 2800: 2774: 2715: 2675: 2633: 2590: 2571: 2537: 2536: 2517: 2498: 2472: 2471: 2455: 2454: 2416: 2396: 2346: 2345: 2310: 2261:), on behalf of 2243:Northamerica1000 2239: 2194:Hello Quadell: 2172: 2154: 2146: 2130: 2123: 2122: 2111: 2093: 2085: 2067: 2060: 2059: 2049: 2047: 2045: 2041: 2036: 2002: 1934: 1906: 1890: 1883: 1867:featured article 1847: 1840: 1817: 1788: 1786: 1779: 1767: 1765: 1758: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1744: 1732: 1703: 1701: 1694: 1679: 1653: 1651: 1644: 1620: 1594:, 1 June 2009)! 1571: 1551: 1549: 1542: 1526: 1500: 1498: 1491: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1472: 1459: 1457: 1450: 1444: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1416: 1414: 1407: 1401: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1363: 1336: 1329: 1328: 1317: 1304: 1301: 1295: 1285: 1253: 1240: 1237: 1231: 1210: 1196: 1194: 1187: 1176: 1174: 1167: 1139: 1108: 1071:I'll Tell Me Ma 1052: 983: 952:Talk:The Wiggles 911: 909: 902: 891: 878: 876: 869: 843: 841: 834: 823: 809: 807: 800: 794: 793: 792: 772: 770: 763: 752: 739: 737: 730: 705: 689: 687: 680: 662: 655: 654: 643: 630: 628: 621: 597: 560: 546: 516: 482: 469: 460: 440: 424: 422: 415: 398: 391: 390: 379: 363: 355: 326: 319: 318: 307: 291: 289: 282: 265: 258: 257: 246: 231: 226: 211:Waveguide filter 191: 59: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3549: 3548: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3527: 3493: 3462: 3454: 3405:Hello Quadell, 3403: 3368: 3337: 3296: 3294:Second opinion? 3265: 3261: 3255: 3232: 3215: 3189:speedy deletion 3175: 3174: 3158: 3157: 3124: 3122: 3097: 3079: 3067: 3049: 3029: 3014: 2996: 2966: 2963: 2948: 2925: 2910: 2891: 2876: 2864: 2853: 2835: 2814: 2795: 2769: 2743: 2710: 2685: 2683:Polbot articles 2670: 2643: 2628: 2600: 2585: 2569: 2538: 2534: 2531: 2512: 2496: 2483:speedy deletion 2469: 2468: 2452: 2451: 2414: 2412: 2391: 2347: 2343: 2340: 2305: 2271: 2266: 2199:WikiProject AFC 2184: 2167: 2150: 2142: 2121: 2106: 2089: 2081: 2058: 2044: 2035: 2030: 1997: 1944: 1932: 1916: 1901: 1888: 1881: 1859: 1842: 1834: 1804: 1782: 1777: 1775: 1761: 1756: 1754: 1748: 1727: 1697: 1692: 1690: 1674: 1665:Outside opinion 1647: 1642: 1640: 1635:and its review 1629: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1572: 1563: 1545: 1540: 1538: 1535:a friend indeed 1521: 1494: 1489: 1487: 1481: 1467: 1453: 1448: 1446: 1434: 1410: 1405: 1403: 1391: 1373: 1358: 1327: 1312: 1299: 1293: 1291: 1270: 1248: 1235: 1229: 1227: 1224:the review page 1220: 1205: 1190: 1185: 1183: 1170: 1165: 1163: 1149: 1134: 1103: 1047: 978: 923: 905: 900: 898: 886: 872: 867: 865: 855: 837: 832: 830: 818: 803: 798: 796: 790: 784: 766: 761: 759: 747: 733: 728: 726: 719:Frank Underwood 715: 713:Frank Underwood 700: 683: 678: 676: 653: 638: 624: 619: 617: 607: 592: 570: 555: 544: 540: 511: 492: 477: 467: 456: 453: 450: 435: 418: 413: 411: 389: 374: 357: 317: 302: 285: 280: 278: 256: 241: 229: 224: 203: 186: 143: 138: 57: 54:January 2, 2014 53: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3547: 3545: 3537: 3536: 3520: 3492: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3439:flight deck - 3402: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3347: 3346: 3333: 3329: 3295: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3231: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3199:for deletion. 3179:will stop the 3147: 3146: 3121: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3090: 3089: 3028: 3025: 3024: 3023: 2995: 2992: 2968:Anna Frodesiak 2962: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2924: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2890: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2852: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2813: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2684: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2665:Vinethemonkey 2642: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2627:Best of luck! 2599: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2532: 2530: 2525:Nomination of 2523: 2522: 2521: 2493:for deletion. 2473:will stop the 2441: 2440: 2411: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2341: 2339: 2334:Nomination of 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2270: 2269:Spam-whitelist 2267: 2240: 2228:and help out! 2223: 2210: 2185: 2183: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2161: 2160: 2137: 2136: 2131: 2120: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2100: 2099: 2076: 2075: 2070: 2068: 2057: 2054: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 1956: 1955: 1950: 1943: 1940: 1915: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1803: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1771: 1719: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1628: 1625: 1577: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1517: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1478:That's great! 1424: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1352: 1351: 1337: 1326: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1294:Chris Troutman 1274:United Nations 1269: 1267:United Nations 1265:nomination of 1259: 1258: 1257: 1230:Chris Troutman 1219: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1113: 1112: 1085: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1057: 1056: 1043: 1042: 1024: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 990: 989: 988: 987: 971: 970: 933:User:AngusWOOF 922: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 854: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 783: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 714: 711: 710: 709: 694: 693: 671: 670: 665: 663: 652: 649: 648: 647: 606: 603: 602: 601: 569: 566: 565: 564: 539: 538:Hendrix review 536: 535: 534: 520: 491: 488: 487: 486: 463: 449: 446: 445: 444: 429: 428: 407: 406: 401: 399: 388: 385: 384: 383: 368: 367: 339: 338: 329: 327: 316: 313: 312: 311: 296: 295: 274: 273: 268: 266: 255: 252: 251: 250: 202: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 142: 139: 137: 136: 131: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 58:August 1, 2014 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3546: 3535: 3531: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3497: 3490: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3466: 3458: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3429: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3411: 3406: 3400: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3372: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3345: 3341: 3334: 3330: 3327: 3324:Hello again, 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3303: 3301: 3293: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3269: 3260: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3230: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3171: 3169: 3165: 3154: 3152: 3145: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3138: 3134: 3120: 3116: 3113: 3105: 3101: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3088: 3083: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3071: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3053: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3006: 3002: 2993: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2969: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2867: 2861: 2859: 2850: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2811: 2803: 2799: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2740: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2724: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2714: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2694: 2690: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2655:Vinethemonkey 2652: 2649: 2646: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2609: 2605: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2577: 2576: 2573: 2572: 2563: 2560: 2555: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2504: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2465: 2463: 2459: 2448: 2446: 2439: 2437: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2428: 2424: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2372: 2369: 2364: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2353: 2352:Anti-war film 2337: 2336:Anti-war film 2333: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2309: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2275: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2227: 2220: 2218: 2214: 2208: 2207: 2202:is holding a 2201: 2200: 2195: 2189: 2182: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2165: 2164: 2159: 2155: 2153: 2147: 2145: 2139: 2138: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2124: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2104: 2103: 2098: 2094: 2092: 2086: 2084: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2071: 2066: 2061: 2055: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2042: 2039: 2027: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1977: 1974: 1972: 1967: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1914:Input request 1913: 1909: 1905: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1885: 1884: 1876: 1875:first attempt 1872: 1868: 1864: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1838: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1814: 1811: 1807: 1801: 1791: 1787: 1785: 1780: 1772: 1770: 1766: 1764: 1759: 1743: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1725: 1720: 1717: 1713: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1702: 1700: 1695: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1671: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1650: 1645: 1638: 1634: 1626: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1595: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1576: 1570: 1560: 1554: 1550: 1548: 1543: 1536: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1503: 1499: 1497: 1492: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1456: 1451: 1443: 1429: 1428: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1413: 1408: 1400: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1356: 1355: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1302: 1296: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1232: 1225: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1193: 1188: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1173: 1168: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1142: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1107: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1061: 1055: 1051: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1004: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 986: 982: 975: 974: 973: 972: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 948: 947: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 920: 914: 910: 908: 903: 896: 895: 894: 890: 884: 883: 882: 881: 877: 875: 870: 863: 860: 852: 846: 842: 840: 835: 828: 827: 826: 822: 815: 814: 813: 812: 808: 806: 801: 781: 775: 771: 769: 764: 757: 756: 755: 751: 745: 744: 743: 742: 738: 736: 731: 724: 720: 712: 708: 704: 698: 697: 692: 688: 686: 681: 673: 672: 669: 666: 661: 656: 650: 646: 642: 636: 635: 634: 633: 629: 627: 622: 615: 612: 604: 600: 596: 590: 589: 588: 587: 583: 579: 575: 572:Hey Quadell, 567: 563: 559: 553: 552: 551: 550: 547: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 519: 515: 508: 507: 506: 505: 501: 497: 489: 485: 481: 475: 474: 473: 472: 468: 466: 461: 459: 447: 443: 439: 433: 432: 427: 423: 421: 416: 409: 408: 405: 402: 397: 392: 386: 382: 378: 372: 371: 366: 361: 353: 349: 345: 341: 340: 337: 336: 335: 330: 325: 320: 314: 310: 306: 300: 299: 294: 290: 288: 283: 276: 275: 272: 269: 264: 259: 253: 249: 245: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 232: 227: 220: 216: 212: 208: 194: 190: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 170: 166: 162: 161: 160: 159: 155: 151: 147: 140: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3505:Ugog Nizdast 3498: 3494: 3436: 3433:Chilean Navy 3431: 3407: 3404: 3304: 3300:Piotr Skarga 3297: 3259:OTRS pending 3233: 3183:, but other 3172: 3164:edit summary 3155: 3148: 3143: 3131:The article 3130: 3082:Technical 13 3052:Technical 13 3030: 2997: 2964: 2926: 2892: 2857: 2854: 2848: 2815: 2744: 2726: 2723:Leptictidium 2696: 2693:Leptictidium 2686: 2653: 2650: 2647: 2644: 2613:Gwillhickers 2612: 2601: 2574: 2567: 2564: 2556: 2541: 2539: 2529:for deletion 2501: 2494: 2477:, but other 2466: 2458:edit summary 2449: 2442: 2433: 2421:The article 2420: 2373: 2365: 2350: 2348: 2338:for deletion 2276: 2272: 2226:drive's page 2221: 2216: 2212: 2203: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2151: 2143: 2133: 2090: 2082: 2072: 2037: 2031: 2009: 1980: 1978: 1975: 1968: 1960: 1959: 1957: 1928:Jimi Hendrix 1917: 1887: 1880: 1878: 1860: 1815: 1812: 1808: 1805: 1783: 1778:Seabuckthorn 1762: 1757:Seabuckthorn 1716:WP:Consensus 1698: 1693:Seabuckthorn 1664: 1648: 1643:Seabuckthorn 1630: 1612: 1599:Gerda Arendt 1596: 1584:fair unblock 1574: 1573: 1546: 1541:Seabuckthorn 1534: 1513: 1495: 1490:Seabuckthorn 1454: 1449:Seabuckthorn 1411: 1406:Seabuckthorn 1374: 1341:Ugog Nizdast 1278:good article 1272:The article 1271: 1221: 1218:UN GA review 1191: 1186:Seabuckthorn 1181: 1171: 1166:Seabuckthorn 1150: 1114: 1086: 1058: 927: 924: 921:Wiggles woes 906: 901:Seabuckthorn 873: 868:Seabuckthorn 856: 838: 833:Seabuckthorn 804: 799:Seabuckthorn 785: 767: 762:Seabuckthorn 734: 729:Seabuckthorn 716: 684: 679:Seabuckthorn 667: 625: 620:Seabuckthorn 608: 571: 541: 524:TheOnlyOne12 496:TheOnlyOne12 493: 490:Jimi Hendrix 464: 457: 451: 419: 414:Seabuckthorn 403: 354: 348:send... over 344:Peacemaker67 332: 331: 286: 281:Seabuckthorn 270: 222: 221:. Regards, 204: 144: 118: 43: 37: 3278:Storye book 3237:Storye book 3133:Shadow Hare 3119:Shadow Hare 2994:Hello again 2858:Sgt. Pepper 2851:peer review 2849:Sgt. Pepper 2812:Angelou FAC 2283:Gary Wright 2204:month long 1633:Agriculture 1627:Agriculture 1280:has passed 578:Вик Ретлхед 36:This is an 3475:Ariadacapo 3415:Ariadacapo 3381:Ammodramus 3355:Ammodramus 3326:Ammodramus 3311:Ammodramus 2977:Jim Carter 2933:GoingBatty 2721:Thanks! -- 2641:Recruiting 2436:WP:COMPANY 2241:Posted by 1871:third time 1816:Thank-you. 1006:Toot Toot 897:Thanks! -- 169:WP:ILIKEIT 119:Archive 56 3197:consensus 3135:has been 2491:consensus 2425:has been 2236:changelog 2213:eliminate 2038:Miss Bono 1889:Nidhiki05 1724:this edit 1120:AngusWOOF 1089:AngusWOOF 1032:AngusWOOF 960:AngusWOOF 465:(Ping me) 150:Modernist 141:Mediation 3437:Williams 2979:through 2651:Thanks, 2570:SilkTork 2497:SilkTork 1561:Precious 568:Infinite 458:Vensatry 225:Spinning 3530:Quadell 3465:Quadell 3457:PD-self 3371:Quadell 3340:Quadell 3336:best, 3307:WP:MEAT 3268:Quadell 3218:Quadell 3100:Quadell 3070:Quadell 3017:Quadell 2951:Quadell 2913:Quadell 2879:Quadell 2838:Quadell 2798:Quadell 2772:Quadell 2713:Quadell 2673:Quadell 2631:Quadell 2588:Quadell 2552:deleted 2515:Quadell 2394:Quadell 2361:deleted 2308:Quadell 2170:Quadell 2109:Quadell 2000:Quadell 1904:Quadell 1845:Quadell 1730:Quadell 1677:Quadell 1618:Quadell 1524:Quadell 1470:Quadell 1378:article 1371:Thanks! 1361:Quadell 1315:Quadell 1251:Quadell 1208:Quadell 1160:sandbox 1137:Quadell 1106:Quadell 1050:Quadell 981:Quadell 889:Quadell 821:Quadell 782:Thanks! 750:Quadell 723:sandbox 703:Quadell 641:Quadell 595:Quadell 558:Quadell 514:Quadell 480:Quadell 438:Quadell 377:Quadell 305:Quadell 244:Quadell 189:Quadell 172:Werieth 165:WP:NFCR 39:archive 3501:WP:NFC 3451:Evogol 3441:UNITAS 3166:or on 3041:Polbot 2865:GabeMc 2689:Polbot 2460:or on 2253:using 2144:Dom497 2083:Dom497 2028:Howdy! 1933:GabeMc 1869:for a 1837:Dom497 1712:WP:3RR 1286:; see 721:in my 591:Done. 574:here's 545:GabeMc 448:Trichy 3201:JDDJS 2782:Elvey 2755:Elvey 2610:. -- 2377:JDDJS 2249:) on 1261:Your 230:Spark 16:< 3509:talk 3479:talk 3419:talk 3385:talk 3359:talk 3315:talk 3282:talk 3241:talk 3205:talk 3080:{{U| 3050:{{U| 3005:Talk 2985:talk 2973:here 2937:talk 2900:talk 2825:talk 2786:talk 2759:talk 2659:talk 2618:talk 2381:talk 2322:talk 2318:JG66 2295:talk 2291:JG66 2259:talk 2247:talk 2152:talk 2091:talk 2016:talk 2011:Cirt 1987:talk 1982:Cirt 1920:here 1865:for 1824:talk 1714:and 1687:here 1637:here 1603:talk 1537:. -- 1514:does 1386:here 1345:talk 1300:talk 1236:talk 1156:here 1124:talk 1093:talk 1036:talk 964:talk 954:and 941:talk 862:here 614:here 582:talk 528:talk 500:talk 219:here 176:talk 154:talk 3117:of 3084:}} 3054:}} 3045:DGG 3033:CVs 3001:Elf 2407:of 1973:. 1926:at 1882:Toa 1382:GAN 209:of 207:FAC 56:to 3528:– 3511:) 3481:) 3463:– 3459:}} 3455:{{ 3421:) 3387:) 3369:– 3361:) 3338:– 3317:) 3284:) 3266:– 3262:}} 3256:{{ 3243:) 3216:– 3207:) 3170:. 3153:. 3098:– 3068:– 3037:PD 3015:– 3003:| 2987:) 2949:– 2939:) 2911:– 2902:) 2877:– 2836:– 2827:) 2796:– 2788:) 2770:– 2761:) 2731:) 2728:mt 2711:– 2701:) 2698:mt 2671:– 2661:) 2629:– 2620:) 2586:– 2554:. 2513:– 2464:. 2447:. 2392:– 2383:) 2363:. 2324:) 2306:– 2297:) 2219:. 2168:– 2156:) 2107:– 2095:) 2018:) 1998:– 1989:) 1979:— 1930:. 1902:– 1843:– 1826:) 1753:-- 1728:– 1675:– 1616:– 1605:) 1597:-- 1522:– 1486:-- 1468:– 1402:-- 1359:– 1347:) 1313:– 1263:GA 1249:– 1226:. 1206:– 1162:-- 1135:– 1126:) 1104:– 1095:) 1048:– 1038:) 979:– 966:) 943:) 887:– 819:– 748:– 701:– 639:– 593:– 584:) 556:– 530:) 512:– 502:) 478:– 436:– 375:– 362:}} 358:{{ 350:) 303:– 242:– 187:– 178:) 156:) 134:59 129:58 124:57 114:55 109:54 104:53 99:52 94:51 89:50 84:40 79:30 74:20 69:10 3507:( 3477:( 3417:( 3383:( 3357:( 3313:( 3280:( 3251:( 3239:( 3203:( 2983:( 2935:( 2898:( 2823:( 2784:( 2757:( 2725:( 2695:( 2657:( 2616:( 2438:. 2379:( 2320:( 2293:( 2257:( 2245:( 2209:! 2148:( 2087:( 2014:( 1985:( 1839:: 1835:@ 1822:( 1784:♥ 1763:♥ 1699:♥ 1649:♥ 1601:( 1590:( 1547:♥ 1496:♥ 1455:♥ 1412:♥ 1343:( 1303:) 1297:( 1239:) 1233:( 1192:♥ 1172:♥ 1122:( 1091:( 1034:( 962:( 939:( 907:♥ 874:♥ 839:♥ 805:♥ 768:♥ 735:♥ 685:♥ 626:♥ 580:( 526:( 498:( 454:— 420:♥ 346:( 287:♥ 174:( 152:( 60:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index