1374:
of your replies and comments make it a chore to read, which is why so few participate in the discussions. The possible benefit is outweighed by the effort required. The content itself is petty when compared to the disruption you both, equally, have caused. Is it going to kill the article if the information is there or not there? No? Either way, does it fundamentally change enhance or diminish the understanding of the subject matter? No? Exactly. It is a trivial detail that doesn't hurt anyone or anything, whether or not it stays. Solve the dispute like men. Flip a coin, play
1088:
945:
1031:
to the editors involved, I wasn't exactly sure of who should or should not be notified so rather than make the mistake of not notifying the people involved I instead notfied them all - as far as I'm aware there were none left out. So really it wasn't a case of selective picking and choosing, it's just that of the editors previously involved all seemed to have their own ideas on the subject which they came to independentally.
1550:
discussion - you were merely notified as per policy. Any editor who reaches the limit of their attention or tolerance can freely absent themselves from any debate. Similarly, whether I 'bother to reply' is, again, my decision, and no one editor should be attempting to dissuade another from exercising free speech - especially on their own 'talk' page. In fact, that kind of dissuasion is, ironically, dissuaded. This:
2980:
2928:
2746:
2690:
2052:
1996:
125:
2568:
1934:
2323:
editors views of any new material - for example, some of the new referenced material was removed en mass by another editor on the assumption, it seems, that this new material was simply a repost of previous information. But actually it wasn't. I messaged that editor with this information too and I presume they took another look at it and then differentiated between the new material and the older stuff.
1775:
just do not get along with each other well. That's fine, we all have someone we just can't clique with. But in this case, as a personal favor, I would ask you both just try to avoid each other when possible, and keep any discussions on article talk pages when necessary. Let time heal old wounds. You both have a lot to contribute, but only if you aren't spending your time in disputes. Thanks.
2800:
2881:
283:
22:
1271:'I wasn't scolding you, just informing you and pointing to the guideline on it. You said you weren't sure who to notify, and it is common for people to not know the policy on it. If you had only selected certain editors (even if random) it would have come back and caused problems, so as a general rule, it is just better to tell anyone that participated, as a preventative measure.
2178:
974:
618:
224:
2997:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
2945:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
2765:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
2709:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
2071:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
2015:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1683:.) So, there's a long way to go yet before the material can be uncontrovertably reverted back to the page without there being a perfectly justifiable Knowledge reason for further reversion. But then Jimmy Wales obviously wants all these relevant routes and options available on Knowledge for a very good reason, so who are we to argue.
2317:
intention at all to 'continue the long running slow edit war' as I'm not part of that and I didn't even know the page existed then. I did see the banner on the page about the semi-lock, etc, and read that, but I didn't check exact details of the edit history - I just started to add info and refs that I thought improved the page.
853:(1) "All I have to add to this interminable debate is WP:SNOW. ...this is absolutely silly." (2) "drawing out interminable arguments that have no chance of success is disruptive." (3) "Statements like '...' are bizarre, even laughable." (4) "...drawing out interminable arguments that have no chance of success is disruptive.")
2322:
I like to think that a referenced discography is a perfectly acceptable addition for any music producer or songwriter's page - and would actually be an expected part of such a page as it speaks to their notability for inclusion. Though I can see now that what has gone on in the past might colour some
1549:
to be included in the ANI for context. Also, there has been no hostility on my part and you yourself said the worst that I (and, to be fair, also Dennis) could be accused of was being 'snippy'. Noted: I can live with 'snippy'. Importantly, no one (including yourself) has been 'dragged along' into any
1373:
to each other and dragging all of us along in multiple ANIs and DRs, and honestly, most outsiders see you both as equally culpable in the disruptions, more or less. You both have droned on and on about each other so much that no one CARES about the actual content dispute itself, and the sheer length
1647:
times on my own 'talk' page and on no occasion did I demand to know why you were there or what you wanted. The reversion of the deleted material will only itself be reverted if there are grounds to do so - that's how
Knowledge works; there are no special exemptions for anyone. We have also yet to go
297:. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as
2316:
Thanks for the message. Could I just answer with a bit of background and clear up a couple of assumptions: I came to this page via Michel Gondry's video for Bjork's 'Bacholorette', which in turn led to Gondry's video for 'Lucas With The Lid Off', which is by this producer Lucas Secon. It was not my
1774:
appears to want to move on, and asked me, to ask you, if you could refrain from contributing to his talk page. Obviously, there may be times you need to via templates and such, but I would ask this as a personal favor. I really do think that both of you are good editors in your own right, but you
1598:
Unfortunately, the DRN was closed by
TransporterMan 11 hours earlier than the time stated for closure by Hasteur, which must have been very frustrating for you as it stymied your chance to reply. So, re: your requests for proof from other editors, I thought this might help you and provide some much
1456:
Now convince me this won't set a precedent, and we're done. One big problem is that I know (maybe you don't) that 842U will be back, deleting more "trivia". This misinterpretation of policy must have a stake driven through its heart lest it spreads, and I don't see how you have the power to prevent
1327:
Please could you stop hounding me with false allegations, especially when they appear to be an attempt to divert attention away from the fact that you know full well you have been arguing in bad faith for so long. Don't you think it's bad enough that I've spent so much time gathering evidence that
1166:. Don't you think I've made a few friends in that time? Don't you think I could have invited a few of them to stack the vote too? But I refrained, and look at this mess. The discussion is so tainted with biased editors that I don't see any hope of a good resolution. The moral is: stop canvassing. --
1030:
Dennis, hi, I genuinely wasn't aware that that was classed as canvassing because in the discussions concerning this before I was advised to notify the editors that had contributed to relevant discussions - and also that notifications via 'talk' pages were okay. As I said in the 'talk' page messages
506:
Neil Peart, who is the drummer and lyricist for the
Canadian rock band Rush, used an R1100GS for a 14 month, 55,000-mile (89,000 km) self-healing trip, which he made in the late 1990s following the deaths of his wife and only daughter. The trip was documented in the book Ghost Rider: Travels on the
380:
Mr
Highfield said the BBC would not be hunting down all BBC-copyrighted clips already uploaded by YouTube members - although it would reserve the right for example to swap poor quality clips with the real thing, or to have content removed that infringed other people's copyright, like sport, or that
2906:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
1823:
date: 21:12, 14 April 2012 - archived) that gives the impression that there may be some truth to his assertion, 'But I can't get the guy off my talk page'. Again, please examine our relevent 'talk' page posts and see that that is no truth to it at all. It is just another false accusation. (I would
1110:
Quick note, usually better to keep a conversation in one place, which is why I use the {{Whisperback}} templates, just to redirect you to that page. If we start a conversation here, I will keep it here, if we start it there, I usually try to keep it there. Note the template on the top of my talk
1805:
were communicating at all was because of the discussion - messages never strayed outside of that. So there's no need for this or further messages unless another/further discussions materialise that necessitate it. And, please note, the 'talk' page messages were perfectly polite. And, please note,
655:
Hi, Dennis. Thanks for the note. Always nice to hear from you. However, if you are referring to the use of the word 'aggressive' in the lighthearted aside I made about riding suits on thr BMW R1100GS noticeboard, could I refer you back to your own quote on the BMW R1100GS page in which you said:
397:
The BBC wishes to protect its own material particularly if it is likely to be commercially exploited by others online. This extends to web site content and to domain names (urls or web site addresses) whether or not they are connected to a site. However, at the same time the BBC does not want to
1131:
Oh I see. I wasn't sure what that 'whisperback' was, sorry. Let's keep it here then. In fact, for future reference, if I miss something it's always because I'm not as familiar with code and procedure as some editors (although, to be honest, I don't think that undermines the basis for particular
2328:
Re: the photo: I saw it being used on the official website, along with a photographer credit, so I emailed the author to ask for permission from the photographer to use the image. I received a reply with a copy of the image and a message saying that the photographer was okay with sending image
264:
That's fair enough if you don't want to take The
Corrado Net as a reliable source (even though its factual database is compiled by Corrado enthusiasts) - I understand that. But you also erroneously deleted additional information that was referenced to the BBC and to BBC film sources, which are
1390:. You both need to start acting like adults and work with each other to compromise or one of you simply walk away. And I don't care who, because as far as I can tell, you are both equally in the wrong here. And don't bother replying, I'm officially beyond "discussion" on these points.
564:
There seems to be something of a tag-team going on between Biker Biker and Dennis
Bratland regarding this BMW R1100GS edit and I think the mistaken fixation on the 'prove a point' issue is skewing objectivity on the inclusion of the 'Ghost Riders: Travels on the Healing Road' material.
1432:
Well, I've been suggesting that R1100GS be forgotten about for over 3 weeks, so if you now agree, then we'll agree to leave it as it is. How easy was that. (Though 'well-sourced'? Does that really apply when 2 of the 4 primary sources did not even mention the bike by name? I only
1238:
Out of the editors previously involved, two were genuinely mistakenly missed off the list of notification - one was a user who was involved right at the very beginning nearly a month ago (hence the easy and genuine mistake of neglecting their involvement) - and one editor called
2329:
permission to
Knowledge. I presume that is where the OTRS comes from. I'd like to think that it would be taken as a positive thing that I went through the correct channels, in line with WP regulations on requesting copyright holder permission for image use. Hope this helps.
1897:? I'm going to suppose that you only left the message for me here out of courtesy, not because you believed in the request's legitimacy. (A better response would have been for you to ask him why he was asking you to intercede based on false information - because that puts
1642:
Manners, dear boy. They don't cost anything. I was 'dropping' off the relevant codes you needed to clarify a point on which you seemed uncertain during the
Noticeboard and ANI discussions. I don't expect thanks for that, but neither do I expect hostility. You have posted
1323:
Now if you expended as much time explaining WHY you spent over 3 weeks arguing for a case which you have ADMITTED you did NOT believe in and that you knew to be FALSE - then I would perhaps give greater weight to your arguments and find it easier to take advice on moral
764:
and delete the personal attacks contained in your comments. The warning, in large bold letters at the top, when you edit that page, says "This page is not the place to flame other users". Discuss the topic, not other editors. When you're done with that, please go to
496:. The connection is this: as a fan of bike's myself I was interested to see what an editor with the name 'Biker Biker' might have contributed, so I clicked through. There I found Biker Biker's entries, which I thought were perfectly fine and interesting.
1161:
The problem with canvassing is that it taints the consensus process. Why on Earth would I accept a DRN decision against me? Knowing that the decision was based on at least two editors who were there due to a grudge against me. I've been on
Knowledge for
2580:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
519:
IMPORTANT NOTE 1: my knowledge of what Knowledge constitutes non-relevant was advanced by Biker Biker's reference to the material added to the Corrado page, which caused me to double-check Wikipedias relevence and trivia criteria. So Biker Biker's
2291:
to include the long discography in this article. Similarly, I can't find the precise image you uploaded anywhere else on the internet and from the OTRS you are evidently in contact with the subject. Please read the notice above carefully. Thanks
1558:. Quite. Finally, the point about not caring one way or the other about so-called 'petty' content is one you may personally hold but I think that having a high standard for the inclusion of material is actually beneficial, not detrimental.
1058:, but this was an editor who seemed heavily in favour of the case I was putting so I think that shows that I wasn't trying to be selective. Also, I found the quote on the original Noticeboard discussion where I was fisrt accused that says,
720:
716:
2653:
Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Could you please look it over and see if you can address the issues raised in the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes,
1879:'But you knew that because I just told you, in excruciating detail, and I directed you to the history page so that you could see for yourself. Please don't come around spouting nonsense. I don't have time for this kind of thing.'
499:
But - in the middle of the entry on the BMW R1100GS - there was/is a section on the drummer in a rock band on a 'self-healing trip' after deaths is his family. Now, this is clearly not relevant to an entry on the BMW R1100GS.
1626:, which I expect to be closed almost immediately in my favor, not counting the novella-length brief you will no doubt write and nobody will read. But I haven't done anything yet. So why are you here? What do you want? --
1544:
was a content dispute - it wasn't - and it was a mistake to close it for that reason. It was a justifiable, provable complaint about a bad faith argument. That is not inconsequential. A background of the content dispute
409:
and - as there is no longer any other official Volkswagen issued material on the car (because it is so long out of production) - why is reference to this officially issued tech/spec information not deemed appropriate?
779:
It would be much better for you to edit your own comments to remove the off-topic personal attacks, rather than for someone else to have to edit your comments for you as the result of a AI/N complaint against you.
2608:
1150:
You didn't notify Transporterman, or Biker Biker, to name two. There are several others you left out of the loop. Must I make a complete list? If you weren't picking and choosing editors, it certainly
488:
You haven't stated explicitly what you mean but from what has been said I'll presume you mean that you think my edit of Biker Biker's BMW R1100GS entry is a response to his edit of my contribution to
2592:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2816:. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from
878:
of either being breached. This comes across as an attempt to foreclose, shut down or inhibit debate, which you may or may not know is also contrary to Knowledge policy guidelines on these matters.
708:
1734:
I certainly don't mind you deleting the communication we had on this 'talk' page regarding the BMW R1100GS, but I do object to the incivilty of your deletion message, which said, 'Now go away'
1036:(I'm sure that in the original Noticeboard discussion someone pointed out that notifications via 'talk' pages wasn't classed as canvassing, but I'll make sure I the double-check that.) Thanks,
1578:
Archive for self-reference of deleted 'Talk' page messages and incivility in the deletion message on the Dennis Bratland 'Talk' page. See below for deleted material and deletion message:
454:. Really, please stop and spend time on productive contributions. If you wish to discuss the quality of sources or article content, please do so at the relevant article's talk page. --
2827:
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with
1581:
Latest revision as of 18:35, 14 April 2012 (edit) (undo)Dennis Bratland (talk | contribs) (Reverted to revision 486982741 by DPL bot: tl;dr. you got the last word. now go away. (TW))
163:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any
1966:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any
301:, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators
1622:
I'm going to do what I said I was going to do. Finish my research, then restore and expand the section with a mountain of citations. If you then delete it, I will open a formal
1962:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
1748:“You take full responsibility for any action you perform using Twinkle. You must understand Knowledge policies and use this tool within these policies, or risk being blocked.”
159:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
1495:
I don't have to convince you of anything; and, in fact, it is another one of your impossible requests: other Wikipedians, for some reason, have to convince you of the future
860:
So are you saying that your own use of these terms toward me such as 'silly', 'bizarre' and 'laughable' fall into the above description of criticsm or the one of uncivility?
561:
of Knowledge that you seem to have a problem with and which you are misidentifying as 'prove a point'. But that interconnectedness is all part of the nature of Knowledge.
2182:
766:
329:
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article
1155:
like that's what you were doing. Especially given the history of canvassing for the DRN, first with 842U and then the highly suspect involvement of Iglooflame. It seems
901:
897:
773:
2266:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see
1509:
I've got an idea - why don't we open it up to as many biker Wikipedians as possible to suggest an alternative or comparable bike to the R1100GS? Would you like that?
665:
So, as you can see, I was only taking you at your own word and at your own description of your editing style. I hope this helps clear things up in your mind somewhat.
398:
discourage genuine "fan sites", provided these do not confuse the public into thinking they are official BBC sites or encourage large scale copying of BBC material.'
2895:, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Knowledge having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
1132:
argument being advanced). There's a couple of important points regarding your recent message on the complaint board I opened, so I'll go there to leave that now.
57:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
537:
Biker Biker's deletion of the material I added: "Addendum: If the removal was in line with the Knowledge criteria for deletion of trivia, then I see the point."
95:
because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
670:
Also, I think it is very important to note a crucial distinction: even over guidelines on things such as good faith, Knowledge policy clearly states that this
152:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1955:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
194:
1951:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
148:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
769:
and delete the personal attack and accusations of malfeasance from there. Once again, that is not the place to discuss other editors; the topic is the RfC.
336:
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article
2817:
100:
481:. And the fact that material from those websites are then regurgitated by other published sources such as The Telegraph (your example), does not change
1810:. Remember, we're talking about only 6 messages each over two weeks. The only difference is that I was always polite but Dennis Bratland was not - see
800:
In reference to this misuse of a Knowledge advisory and also the misidentification of 'personal attack', please note your own comment on this subject:
2458:
2409:
2360:
2116:
1159:
to me that the reason you kept on canvassing was that you got away with it before and assumed administrators would let you go on getting away with it.
730:
2007:
882:
And, finally, if you think my editing behavior violates policy, go to Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and make your complaint there.
371:'The BBC's director of Future Media and Technology, Ashley Highfield, said the deal was "not about distributing content like full-length programmes;
199:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
2820:
is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Knowledge policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an
761:
626:
585:
581:
473:. The deletion of personal website material as a source of reference is a well established primary point of Knowledge contributiuons, see - WP:OR -
802:'Calling a bad argument a bad argument is not a personal attack, and pretending that it is a personal attack is also disruptive.'- Dennis Bratland
2821:
2808:
633:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.
3009:
2957:
2870:
2828:
2777:
2757:
2721:
2489:
2267:
2083:
2027:
1971:
168:
2454:
2405:
2356:
2112:
1837:, i.e. the hope that making the first/earliest accusation is enough to make the accusation look legitimate. It isn't enough. In fact, editor
726:
1499:
of something? But to not enact a reasoned solution because of an uprovable supposition about unknown behaviour is simply self-defeating. As
1220:'the reason you kept on canvassing was that you got away with it before and assumed administrators would let you go on getting away with it'
2622:
1885:'I'm not the only one who's been reverting your ill-conceived actions. I call bullshit. I don't think you're as dense as you appear to be.'
1281:
Well, Dennis Brown and I can live in hope that I won't be accused of it, but you always seem to be at hand with further false allegations.
475:'The term "original research" (OR) is used on Knowledge to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable,
919:
Hello back. The relevant discussion has attracted the contributions of other editors, and who clearly do not agree with your case - see:
2832:
2540:
621:
Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
65:
1461:
is probably going to be necessary. It's too bad: WP:WPACT did a lot of good until you came along seeking revenge against Biker Biker. (
348:
Links such as the Top Gear video on Metacafe are clear copyright infringements. You must not link to these in any way on Knowledge.
405:
Also, the earlier deleted Corrado Net database information on the technical specification of the VW Corrado is drawn directly from
2812:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Knowledge may not meet the criteria required by
2105:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to
1939:
2502:, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to
1893:
Are those really the kind of messages from an editor on whose behalf you want to intercede by leaving your previous message for
1414:
altogether if I was convinced that this would not become a precedent used to delete well-sourced sections from more articles. --
1226:
as the first allegation, because, if you again read the comments on your original ANI, you'll find that no one agrees with you.
2618:
2274:
2259:
2186:
1963:
1948:
228:
92:
2506:. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.
723:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
2451:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
2402:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
2353:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
2239:
2199:
2109:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
236:
207:
46:
2824:; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
2701:
1848:
1507:
Indeed. And no doubt PACT could continue to do good if you do not insist on trying to sacrifice it on the alter of vanity.
1206:
2675:
1369:
of you. I have no idea if the info should be included or not, that is what WP:DR and WP:RFC are for. You both have been
1211:'His "canvasing" wasn't canvasing, it was on the talk page of someone who had already participated in the DR 4 days ago.'
622:
366:
Well interestingly, the BBC's own attitude is somewhat more prudent and understanding; this, from the BBC's own news site:
2539:
If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the
346:
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead.
2601:
1742:. And also to your misuse of the TW tag, because by no stretch of the imagination was my message vandalism - please see
190:
2937:
2063:
2993:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2941:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2842:
2761:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2705:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2613:
2204:
2067:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2011:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
140:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2903:
2888:
2874:
1063:"canvasing" wasn't canvasing, it was on the talk page of someone who had already participated in the DR 4 days ago.'
96:
88:
2998:
2994:
2946:
2942:
2908:
2813:
2766:
2710:
2527:
If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to
2072:
2016:
1956:
244:
153:
1680:
1410:
I offered two compromises, and both were rejected. As a third compromise, I would even be willing to forget about
1631:
1470:
1419:
1171:
1020:
909:
785:
643:
459:
385:"We don't want to be overzealous, a lot of the material on YouTube is good promotional content for us," he said.'
304:
983:—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While
813:
So it does not advance any discussion to misuse Knowledge advisory. Or to mistake criticism (which is allowed -
2106:
1943:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1541:
920:
597:
2989:
2439:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
2390:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
2345:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
1011:
only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Knowledge's principle of
402:
But if you want to err on the side of a caution that the even BBC don't take, then that may also be prudent.
2282:
2278:
1806:
that I did not question the other editor's freedom to post on my own 'talk' page, and which he did with the
337:
330:
323:
160:
1122:
1080:
1024:
967:
913:
891:
186:
1781:
1396:
1117:
1094:
1087:
962:
951:
944:
850:(But in further reference to this, please see your own comments toward me on the BMW R1100GS 'Talk' page -
630:
437:
Addendum: If the removal was in line with the Knowledge criteria for deletion of trivia, then I see point.
136:
29:
1209:, and other editors decided it was an unfounded allegation (as they also found your other allegations) -
2589:
2496:
2225:
354:
252:
1983:
2860:
2194:
1979:
1910:
aware of the more accurate nature of the situation, so please by all means let him know. Many thanks.
1866:
1838:
1830:
1802:
1771:
1627:
1466:
1415:
1375:
1167:
1054:
Hi, I've just had a check through and the only one I can see that wasn't notified was someone called
1016:
1008:
1004:
1000:
984:
979:
905:
781:
639:
455:
294:
73:
33:
1857:
1819:
Also, Dennis, there is something about the tenor of your reply to his request on your 'talk' page (
1623:
1012:
589:
108:
2273:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
2214:
articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
1824:
have appreciated a full reading being given to the 'talk' page comments - feel free to read them.)
1304:(2) Users genuinely missed off the notification list that favoured BOTH sides of the case? - Yes.
513:
the inclusion of which is not obviated by the trivia being referenced or integrated into the entry
322:
If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article
1015:-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large.
489:
290:
232:
205:
531:
IMPORTANT POINT 2 - you may have noticed from my talk page response on this subject that I have
2795:
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Confessions Of An Air Ambulance Doctor (paperback).jpg
2185:
your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
1262:
You appear to have mistaken Dennis Brown's message here on this 'talk' page as an accusation -
413:
Finally, what was the reason for deleting the Corrado related 'Trivia' section that referenced
2850:
2576:
2558:
2474:
2425:
2376:
2298:
2162:
2091:
2035:
1776:
1391:
1112:
957:
746:
2197:(COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
1297:
These points are not complicated and should really not present any problem being understood:
1273:
I really didn't think you were trying to canvas, I just didn't want you to get accused of it.
2667:
2659:
2585:
2448:
2145:
2130:
350:
248:
145:
2600:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1676:
687:
As I say, I think it is a very important (if subtle) distinction. With particular regards,
316:
violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
2965:
2856:
2785:
2729:
2548:
1975:
1500:
1462:
1458:
1065:
I genuinely took that to mean that 'talk' page notifications were within bounds. Regards,
451:
265:
reputable and reliable sources, and also an image that has Knowledge citation. Thank you.
172:
69:
51:
896:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
580:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
241:
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say
32:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge takes
2597:
2334:
2249:
1989:
Orphaned non-free image File:No One Left to Lie to - The Values of the Worst Family.jpg
1952:
1913:
1751:
1685:
1608:
1559:
1510:
1438:
1370:
1337:
1156:
1133:
1072:
1037:
927:
883:
688:
423:
266:
149:
104:
1505:'Well, so you claim, at any rate. However, I expect you are no more psychic than I am.
2892:
2639:
2593:
2465:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
2416:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
2367:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
2153:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1672:
828:
737:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
603:
240:
200:
3013:
2912:
2762:
2706:
2470:
2466:
2421:
2417:
2372:
2368:
2309:
2294:
2158:
2154:
2087:
2068:
2031:
2012:
1944:
1668:
1664:
742:
738:
141:
2567:
2514:
submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to
1302:(1) Accusations by you of 'canvassing' investigated and found to be false? - Yes.
2739:
Orphaned non-free image File:Screaming Blue Messiahs - Good and Gone extended.jpg
1906:
I think he should know that you and I have had this conversation and that we are
817:) with uncivility. The two are not the same. Please keep the distinction in mind.
2907:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
2891:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
2655:
2646:
2440:
2391:
2346:
2248:
to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
2190:
2139:
2124:
1411:
1328:
proved your assertion that the R1100Gs was unique was false? - when you already
870:
is your misuse of Wikiepdia policy guidelines such as WP:OWN and WP:SNOW (see -
511:
This is obviously a breach of Knowledge criteria for non-relevance and trivia -
21:
2961:
2781:
2725:
2544:
629:. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the
1657:
1653:
1503:
said to you on the ANI regarding your similar supposition about my motives,
1379:
1240:
1055:
1860:- the accusing editor's own motives/history being examined and questioned.
584:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
2849:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
2604:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2177:
381:
had been edited or altered in a way that would damage the BBC's brand.
3018:
2969:
2917:
2864:
2789:
2733:
2626:
2552:
2478:
2429:
2399:
2380:
2302:
2166:
2095:
2039:
1921:
1856:
that D. Bratland's apparent belief in this method can actually lead to
1786:
1759:
1707:
and can't find anything relevant yet. Hope you're having better luck.)"
1693:
1635:
1616:
1567:
1518:
1474:
1446:
1423:
1401:
1345:
1306:(3) Continuing accusations of canvasing despite all of the above - Yes.
1175:
1141:
1045:
935:
789:
750:
712:
696:
647:
606:
572:
the editor. It is not useful for you to attempt to personalise things.
463:
431:
358:
298:
274:
256:
212:
175:
112:
77:
2898:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
1739:
1552:'because as far as I can tell, you are both equally in the wrong here'
767:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions#Threaded discussion
1928:
Orphaned non-free media (File:YOU CAN'T PARK THERE! - Back Cover.JPG)
1717:
Archive for self-reference deletion of further follow up 'talk' page
36:
very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the
1662:‘Mediation cannot take place if all parties are not willing to take
1600:
871:
805:
762:
Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard#BMW R1100GS .28Reopened.29
2444:
2395:
923:- so I hope this will enable you to draw a line under this matter.
2287:
It strikes me as strange when you've turned up and continued the
772:
Finally, if you think my editing behavior violates policy, go to
483:
the nature of the source or it's elegibility for use on Knowledge
2350:
1675:. (And there's also the request for further information via the
446:
You could maybe have claimed innocence at an earlier stage, but
2607:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
2008:
File:No One Left to Lie to - The Values of the Worst Family.jpg
1649:
289:
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to
64:
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
1743:
1111:
page. Its a pretty good way to do it, but not the only way.
795:
Counter request to remove 'Request to remove personal attacks'
395:
Intellectual property: protecting BBC copyright and trademarks
44:
of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a
2683:
Orphaned non-free image File:SBMESSIAHS - Good & Gone.jpg
103:
if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --
2978:
2926:
2879:
2798:
2744:
2688:
2050:
1994:
1604:
900:
regarding personal attacks by User:Rivercard. The thread is
709:
Prepared for the Worst: Selected Essays and Minority Reports
281:
123:
20:
2809:
File:Confessions Of An Air Ambulance Doctor (paperback).jpg
2484:
Deletion pending for File:Lucas Secon - Knowledge image.jpg
407:
Volkswagen's own network dealership issued Corrado handbook
2923:
Orphaned non-free image File:Gringos - Charles Portis.jpg
2758:
File:Screaming Blue Messiahs - Good and Gone extended.jpg
2045:
Orphaned non-free image File:Hitch-22 paperback cover.jpg
1193:
Dennis, you've missed 3 very important and crucial points
831:, Knowledge policy on that page clearly states that this
2488:
Hello, Rivercard. Some time ago, a file you uploaded —
1205:
The only user who has accused me of cavnvassing is you,
658:"I aggressively deleted mention of the movie as trivia,"
2588:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2532:
2519:
2443:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
2394:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
2349:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
2288:
1870:
1735:
1718:
1580:
711:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
636:
447:
58:
2776:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
2720:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
2649:
just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
2082:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
2026:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
1556:'I have no idea if the info should be included or not'
167:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
2634:
A page you started (Good and Gone) has been reviewed!
2831:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
999:
point of view. Please do not post notices which are
839:And so it is already established that criticism is
3008:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
2956:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1970:will be deleted after seven days, as described on
99:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
921:Request to delete personal attacks else topic ban
902:Request to delete personal attacks else topic ban
794:
568:The paramount thing is the relevance of the edit
2975:Orphaned non-free image File:Escape Velocity.jpg
2221:on the talk pages of affected articles (see the
227:Welcome to Knowledge. We welcome and appreciate
17:File copyright problem with File:Daveulliott.jpg
898:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
774:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
3010:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
3004:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2958:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2952:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2893:section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2829:section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2772:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2716:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2078:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2022:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1799:An very important clarification is needed here
293:, please ensure that the external site is not
83:Possibly unfree File:DEVILFISH paperback 1.jpg
2386:Disambiguation link notification for March 24
2341:Disambiguation link notification for March 17
2207:for more information. In particular, please:
2101:Disambiguation link notification for March 10
1927:
1275:' - Dennis Brown 11:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC) -
492:- but it isn't. Though the two edits are not
8:
1865:For example: in recent deletion messages by
703:Disambiguation link notification for April 5
504:==Ghost Rider: Travels on the Healing Road==
118:Orphaned non-free image File:Daveulliott.jpg
1940:File:YOU CAN'T PARK THERE! - Back Cover.JPG
1833:appears to believe in what we might call a
1540:. It is flatly incorrect to state that the
555:whether or not any improvements can be made
333:with a link to where we can find that note;
2818:Knowledge:Non-free use rationale guideline
2435:Disambiguation link notification for May 4
1365:are pushing me to request a topic ban for
827:, even over guidelines such as good faith
247:for all of your contributions. Thank you.
1660:(although, according to Knowledge policy
181:File:Daveulliott1.JPG listed for deletion
627:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
582:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
373:YouTube is a promotional vehicle for us"
2666:To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's
2258:so that you do not violate Knowledge's
2490:File:Lucas Secon - Knowledge image.jpg
2702:File:SBMESSIAHS - Good & Gone.jpg
1103:Okay, thanks. Glad that's cleared up!
995:in distribution and should reflect a
977:Hello. It appears that you have been
547:the reason why one look's at an entry
239:. Original research also encompasses
185:A file that you uploaded or altered,
87:A file that you uploaded or altered,
68:. Thanks again for your cooperation.
7:
2853:of each individual file for details.
2577:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1869:to other editors, he has said this,
1249:I was not favouring one over another
2909:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
2234:when discussing affected articles,
874:) without their being any evidence
551:what one find's when one gets there
526:the reason I already had it in mind
1007:or side of a debate, or which are
833:"does not prohibit discussion and
756:Request to remove personal attacks
672:'does not prohibit discussion and
312:If you believe the linked site is
144:. However, the image is currently
14:
2938:File:Gringos - Charles Portis.jpg
2064:File:Hitch-22 paperback cover.jpg
524:to what consitutes relevance was
295:violating the creator's copyright
2843:File:You Can't Park There! 1.JPG
2574:Hello, Rivercard. Voting in the
2566:
2176:
1932:
1299:But, just in case: one more time
1086:
972:
943:
616:
222:
2662:) 21:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
2172:Managing a conflict of interest
1750:Let's keep it civil, shall we?
471:I'm sorry but that is incorrect
243:. Please be prepared to cite a
93:Knowledge:Possibly unfree files
2889:File:VW Corrado - standard.jpg
2875:File:VW Corrado - standard.jpg
2833:media copyright questions page
2541:Media copyright questions page
2200:conflict of interest guideline
1243:, who was actually the editor
776:and make your complaint there.
89:File:DEVILFISH paperback 1.jpg
66:media copyright questions page
1:
3019:07:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
2999:our policy for non-free media
2970:03:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
2947:our policy for non-free media
2865:01:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
2790:18:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
2767:our policy for non-free media
2734:18:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
2711:our policy for non-free media
2627:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
2590:Knowledge arbitration process
2073:our policy for non-free media
2040:16:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
2017:our policy for non-free media
1957:our policy for non-free media
1801:: the only reason myself and
1384:I don't care HOW you solve it
1228:This is not complicated stuff
1001:indiscriminately cross-posted
707:Hi. When you recently edited
625:other editors, as you did on
154:our policy for non-free media
2778:criteria for speedy deletion
2722:criteria for speedy deletion
2529:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
2516:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
2504:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
2084:criteria for speedy deletion
2028:criteria for speedy deletion
1972:criteria for speedy deletion
1098:at Dennis Brown's talk page.
987:are allowed, they should be
955:at Dennis Brown's talk page.
213:22:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
191:Knowledge:Files for deletion
169:criteria for speedy deletion
2611:and submit your choices on
2096:17:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
1947:. However, it is currently
1740:Civility: 1.Direct rudeness
1650:Request For Comments WP:RFC
450:is an obvious violation of
3034:
2918:12:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
2814:Knowledge:Non-free content
2619:MediaWiki message delivery
2609:the candidates' statements
2430:10:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
2381:11:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
2303:00:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
2289:long running slow edit war
2167:09:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
1922:13:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
1787:21:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
1760:20:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
1694:18:12, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
1636:15:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
1617:15:27, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
1568:21:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
1519:22:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
1475:21:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
1447:21:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
1424:16:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
1402:13:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
1378:, fight to the death with
1346:12:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
1176:16:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
1142:11:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
1123:11:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
1081:11:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
1046:10:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
1025:18:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
1003:, which espouse a certain
968:15:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
607:17:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
464:23:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
432:14:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
359:08:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
275:23:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
257:22:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
231:, including your edits to
2979:
2927:
2887:A tag has been placed on
2745:
2689:
2212:avoid editing or creating
2144:added a link pointing to
2129:added a link pointing to
2051:
1995:
1266:- as he has said himself:
1245:who most favoured my case
936:12:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
914:18:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
892:17:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
790:15:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
751:10:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
697:14:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
648:04:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
390:And (also from the BBC):
124:
2990:File:Escape Velocity.jpg
2806:Thank you for uploading
2553:14:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
1984:04:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
1917:
1847:has already pointed out
1812:'Archived for Reference'
1728:Incivility and TW misuse
1563:
1514:
1442:
1341:
1137:
1076:
1041:
931:
887:
692:
427:
415:The Independent, the NME
270:
176:03:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
78:13:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
28:Thank you for uploading
2479:10:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
1901:in an unfair position.)
1821:"I will drop a note..."
1656:and, in the event of a
843:the same as uncivility.
682:the same as uncivility.
235:, but we cannot accept
113:15:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
2984:
2932:
2900:contest the nomination
2884:
2803:
2750:
2694:
2664:
2535:that you have done so.
2522:that you have done so.
2256:exercise great caution
2187:you have written about
2056:
2000:
1808:exactly same frequency
1599:needed clarification:
1574:Archived for Reference
1255:complicated reasoning.
1214:Which means that your
509:
400:
388:
286:
129:
52:image description page
25:
2987:Thanks for uploading
2982:
2935:Thanks for uploading
2930:
2883:
2802:
2755:Thanks for uploading
2748:
2699:Thanks for uploading
2692:
2651:
2586:Arbitration Committee
2559:ArbCom Elections 2016
2275:neutral point of view
2205:FAQ for organizations
2181:Hello, Rivercard. We
2061:Thanks for uploading
2054:
2005:Thanks for uploading
1998:
1937:Thanks for uploading
1854:(18:54, 5 April 2012)
1835:'first strike policy'
1795:Dear, Dennis (Brown).
604:DR goes to Wikimania!
543:So, the crucial thing
502:
392:
369:
285:
189:, has been listed at
187:File:Daveulliott1.JPG
134:Thanks for uploading
127:
97:file description page
91:, has been listed at
24:
2638:Thanks for creating
2533:the OTRS noticeboard
2520:the OTRS noticeboard
2467:opt-out instructions
2418:opt-out instructions
2369:opt-out instructions
2195:conflict of interest
2155:opt-out instructions
2107:disambiguation pages
1772:User:Dennis Bratland
1703:I'm reading through
1376:Rock, paper, sissors
739:opt-out instructions
137:File:Daveulliott.jpg
30:File:Daveulliott.jpg
2822:image copyright tag
2531:and let us know at
2518:and let us know at
1953:You may add it back
1654:Third Opinion WP:3O
1554:is contradicted by
867:Also worthy of note
721:fix with Dab solver
660:- Dennis Bratland'.
150:You may add it back
2985:
2933:
2885:
2804:
2751:
2695:
2602:arbitration policy
2561:: Voting now open!
2492:— was tagged with
2457:• Join us at the
2408:• Join us at the
2359:• Join us at the
2115:• Join us at the
2057:
2001:
1679:, as you yourself
1677:Motorcycle Project
729:• Join us at the
559:interconnectedness
490:Volkswagen Corrado
291:Volkswagen Corrado
287:
233:Volkswagen Corrado
229:your contributions
130:
26:
2995:claim of fair use
2943:claim of fair use
2904:visiting the page
2763:claim of fair use
2707:claim of fair use
2679:
2674:Learn more about
2645:Knowledge editor
2462:
2413:
2364:
2193:, you may have a
2120:
2069:claim of fair use
2013:claim of fair use
1945:claim of fair use
1784:
1669:Final Arbitration
1399:
1251:. Again, this is
1120:
965:
824:Important to note
734:
678:And criticism is
588:". Thank you. --
557:. It is the very
237:original research
193:. Please see the
142:claim of fair use
3025:
3016:
2981:
2929:
2915:
2882:
2854:
2801:
2753:
2747:
2697:
2691:
2673:
2570:
2501:
2495:
2452:
2449:High Maintenance
2403:
2354:
2260:content policies
2230:
2224:
2180:
2146:Big Beat Records
2131:Big Beat Records
2110:
2059:
2053:
2003:
1997:
1964:my contributions
1936:
1935:
1844:
1782:
1779:
1397:
1394:
1118:
1115:
1099:
1097:
1090:
1009:selectively sent
985:friendly notices
976:
975:
963:
960:
956:
954:
947:
904:. Thank you. —
724:
717:check to confirm
620:
619:
600:
594:
284:
226:
225:
203:
161:my contributions
132:
126:
3033:
3032:
3028:
3027:
3026:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3014:
3012:. Thank you. --
2977:
2960:. Thank you. --
2925:
2913:
2880:
2878:
2871:Speedy deletion
2848:
2799:
2797:
2780:. Thank you. --
2742:
2741:
2724:. Thank you. --
2686:
2685:
2636:
2631:
2630:
2614:the voting page
2571:
2563:
2543:. Thank you. --
2499:
2493:
2486:
2459:DPL WikiProject
2437:
2410:DPL WikiProject
2388:
2361:DPL WikiProject
2343:
2283:autobiographies
2228:
2222:
2219:propose changes
2189:in the article
2174:
2117:DPL WikiProject
2103:
2048:
2047:
1992:
1991:
1933:
1930:
1867:Dennis Bratland
1840:
1831:Dennis Bratland
1814:material above.
1803:Dennis Bratland
1777:
1769:
1628:Dennis Bratland
1576:
1467:Dennis Bratland
1457:that. Deleting
1416:Dennis Bratland
1392:
1386:, but solve it
1358:
1168:Dennis Bratland
1113:
1092:
1085:
1017:Dennis Bratland
973:
958:
949:
942:
906:Dennis Bratland
797:
782:Dennis Bratland
758:
731:DPL WikiProject
705:
640:Dennis Bratland
617:
614:
598:
590:
578:
456:Dennis Bratland
444:
282:
245:reliable source
223:
220:
210:
201:
183:
121:
120:
85:
59:your upload log
19:
12:
11:
5:
3031:
3029:
2976:
2973:
2924:
2921:
2877:
2873:nomination of
2868:
2846:
2845:
2796:
2793:
2740:
2737:
2684:
2681:
2635:
2632:
2572:
2565:
2564:
2562:
2556:
2537:
2536:
2524:
2523:
2485:
2482:
2436:
2433:
2387:
2384:
2342:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2331:
2330:
2325:
2324:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2313:
2264:
2263:
2253:
2243:
2238:your COI (see
2232:
2215:
2173:
2170:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2102:
2099:
2046:
2043:
1990:
1987:
1929:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1911:
1903:
1902:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1882:
1881:
1875:
1862:
1861:
1826:
1825:
1816:
1815:
1796:
1791:
1768:
1767:A favor to ask
1765:
1764:
1763:
1732:
1731:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1684:
1596:
1579:
1575:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1522:
1521:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1427:
1426:
1405:
1404:
1357:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1325:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1305:
1303:
1301:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1257:
1256:
1233:
1231:
1218:allegation of
1200:
1197:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1179:
1178:
1145:
1144:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1105:
1104:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1049:
1048:
1033:
1032:
941:
939:
938:
925:
924:
880:
879:
862:
861:
857:
856:
855:
854:
851:
845:
844:
819:
818:
810:
809:
796:
793:
757:
754:
704:
701:
700:
699:
684:
683:
667:
666:
662:
661:
651:
650:
613:
610:
592:TransporterMan
577:
574:
539:
538:
516:
505:
479:sources exist'
469:
466:
443:
440:
439:
438:
422:
377:
376:
368:
367:
362:
361:
344:
343:
342:
341:
334:
327:
309:
280:
279:
278:
277:
219:
216:
208:
182:
179:
171:. Thank you.
119:
116:
101:the discussion
84:
81:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3030:
3021:
3020:
3017:
3011:
3007:
3002:
3000:
2996:
2992:
2991:
2974:
2972:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2955:
2950:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2939:
2922:
2920:
2919:
2916:
2910:
2905:
2901:
2896:
2894:
2890:
2876:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2852:
2844:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2836:
2835:. Thank you.
2834:
2830:
2825:
2823:
2819:
2815:
2811:
2810:
2794:
2792:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2770:
2768:
2764:
2760:
2759:
2752:
2738:
2736:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2714:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2703:
2696:
2682:
2680:
2677:
2676:page curation
2671:
2669:
2663:
2661:
2657:
2650:
2648:
2643:
2642:, Rivercard!
2641:
2640:Good and Gone
2633:
2629:
2628:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2582:
2579:
2578:
2569:
2560:
2557:
2555:
2554:
2550:
2546:
2542:
2534:
2530:
2526:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2505:
2498:
2491:
2483:
2481:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2463:
2460:
2456:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2434:
2432:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2414:
2411:
2407:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2385:
2383:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2365:
2362:
2358:
2352:
2348:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2327:
2326:
2321:
2320:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2293:
2290:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2271:
2269:
2261:
2257:
2254:
2251:
2247:
2246:avoid linking
2244:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2227:
2220:
2216:
2213:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2206:
2202:
2201:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2179:
2171:
2169:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2147:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2138:
2137:
2132:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2118:
2114:
2108:
2100:
2098:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2086:. Thank you.
2085:
2081:
2076:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2065:
2058:
2044:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2030:. Thank you.
2029:
2025:
2020:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2009:
2002:
1988:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1974:. Thank you.
1973:
1969:
1965:
1960:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1941:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1912:
1909:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1877:
1876:
1874:
1873:
1868:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1846:
1845:
1843:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1827:
1822:
1818:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1804:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1789:
1788:
1785:
1780:
1773:
1766:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1746:, which says
1745:
1741:
1738:- please see
1737:
1733:
1730:
1729:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1720:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1697:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1620:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1597:
1595:
1593:
1592:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1583:
1582:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1534:
1523:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1395:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1332:it was false?
1331:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1282:
1279:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1247:, so clearly
1246:
1242:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1158:
1154:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1129:
1124:
1121:
1116:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1095:a new message
1089:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1064:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1005:point of view
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
981:
970:
969:
966:
961:
953:
952:a new message
946:
937:
933:
929:
926:
922:
918:
917:
916:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
894:
893:
889:
885:
877:
873:
869:
868:
864:
863:
859:
858:
852:
849:
848:
847:
846:
842:
838:
836:
830:
826:
825:
821:
820:
816:
812:
811:
807:
803:
799:
798:
792:
791:
787:
783:
777:
775:
770:
768:
763:
760:Please go to
755:
753:
752:
748:
744:
740:
735:
732:
728:
722:
718:
714:
710:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
685:
681:
677:
675:
669:
668:
664:
663:
659:
654:
653:
652:
649:
645:
641:
638:
637:
632:
628:
624:
611:
609:
608:
605:
601:
595:
593:
587:
583:
575:
573:
571:
566:
562:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
529:
527:
523:
522:own reference
517:
514:
508:
507:Healing Road.
501:
497:
495:
491:
486:
484:
480:
478:
472:
467:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
441:
436:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
420:
419:MSN editorial
416:
411:
408:
403:
399:
396:
391:
387:
386:
382:
378:
374:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
349:
339:
335:
332:
328:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
315:
310:
308:
307:from editing.
306:
300:
296:
292:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
217:
215:
214:
211:
206:
204:
198:
197:
192:
188:
180:
178:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
131:
117:
115:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
82:
80:
79:
75:
71:
67:
62:
60:
55:
53:
49:
48:
47:copyright tag
43:
39:
35:
31:
23:
16:
3005:
3003:
2988:
2986:
2953:
2951:
2936:
2934:
2899:
2897:
2886:
2851:page history
2847:
2837:
2826:
2807:
2805:
2773:
2771:
2756:
2754:
2743:
2717:
2715:
2700:
2698:
2687:
2672:
2665:
2652:
2644:
2637:
2612:
2606:
2583:
2575:
2573:
2538:
2528:
2515:
2511:
2510:If you have
2503:
2497:OTRS pending
2487:
2464:
2438:
2415:
2389:
2366:
2344:
2286:
2272:
2265:
2255:
2245:
2235:
2226:request edit
2218:
2211:
2198:
2175:
2152:
2104:
2079:
2077:
2062:
2060:
2049:
2023:
2021:
2006:
2004:
1993:
1967:
1961:
1938:
1931:
1907:
1898:
1894:
1884:
1878:
1871:
1858:WP:BOOMERANG
1853:
1849:
1841:
1839:
1834:
1820:
1811:
1807:
1798:
1790:
1778:Dennis Brown
1770:
1755:
1747:
1727:
1726:
1716:
1704:
1700:
1689:
1667:’), finally
1661:
1644:
1638:
1612:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1584:
1577:
1555:
1551:
1546:
1538:Dennis Brown
1537:
1508:
1504:
1496:
1434:
1393:Dennis Brown
1387:
1383:
1366:
1362:
1329:
1298:
1280:
1272:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1235:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1202:
1198:
1192:
1191:
1163:
1160:
1152:
1114:Dennis Brown
1084:
1071:
1062:
1059:
996:
992:
988:
978:
971:
959:Dennis Brown
940:
895:
881:
875:
866:
865:
840:
834:
832:
823:
822:
814:
801:
778:
771:
759:
736:
706:
679:
673:
671:
657:
634:
631:welcome page
615:
591:
579:
569:
567:
563:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
541:
533:
532:
530:
525:
521:
518:
512:
510:
503:
498:
493:
487:
482:
476:
474:
470:
468:
445:
418:
414:
412:
406:
404:
401:
394:
393:
389:
384:
383:
379:
372:
370:
347:
345:
313:
311:
302:
288:
221:
202:Sir Armbrust
195:
184:
164:
158:
135:
133:
122:
86:
63:
56:
45:
41:
37:
27:
2441:Lucas Secon
2392:Lucas Secon
2347:Lucas Secon
2240:WP:DISCLOSE
2191:Lucas Secon
2140:Lucas Secon
2125:Lucacentric
1842:Ravenswing
1705:Ghost Rider
1591:BMW R1100GS
1412:BMW R1100GS
993:nonpartisan
586:BMW R1100GS
494:unconnected
351:Biker Biker
249:Biker Biker
2857:FastilyBot
2598:topic bans
2469:. Thanks,
2420:. Thanks,
2371:. Thanks,
2231:template);
2157:. Thanks,
1976:Hazard-Bot
1501:Ravenswing
1388:yourselves
1356:Final word
980:canvassing
876:whatsoever
741:. Thanks,
612:April 2012
218:March 2012
196:discussion
173:Courcelles
70:Sfan00 IMG
2668:talk page
2594:site bans
2453:Read the
2404:Read the
2355:Read the
2335:Rivercard
2111:Read the
1914:Rivercard
1829:The user
1752:Rivercard
1686:Rivercard
1681:suggested
1658:mediation
1624:mediation
1609:Rivercard
1560:Rivercard
1511:Rivercard
1439:Rivercard
1380:Bat'leths
1338:Rivercard
1134:Rivercard
1093:You have
1073:Rivercard
1038:Rivercard
1013:consensus
950:You have
928:Rivercard
884:Rivercard
835:criticism
815:see below
725:Read the
689:Rivercard
674:criticism
553:and then
477:published
448:this edit
424:Rivercard
338:Talk page
331:Talk page
324:Talk page
267:Rivercard
105:ww2censor
34:copyright
3006:articles
2954:articles
2855:Thanks,
2774:articles
2718:articles
2333:Thanks,
2279:sourcing
2236:disclose
2217:instead
2080:articles
2024:articles
1968:articles
1949:orphaned
1648:through
1463:WP:POINT
1459:WP:WPACT
1324:lessons.
1264:it isn't
1222:, is as
534:accepted
452:WP:POINT
442:WP:POINT
303:will be
209:Contribs
165:articles
146:orphaned
40:and the
3015:Minorax
2914:Minorax
2471:DPL bot
2422:DPL bot
2400:Cassidy
2373:DPL bot
2310:SmartSE
2295:SmartSE
2268:WP:PAID
2250:WP:SPAM
2183:welcome
2159:DPL bot
2088:Stefan2
2032:Stefan2
1719:message
1497:absence
1371:hostile
1164:7 years
1157:obvious
1091:Hello.
997:neutral
989:limited
948:Hello.
804:(see -
743:DPL bot
713:Harpers
545:is not
305:blocked
299:YouTube
50:to the
38:license
2911:. --
2838:Also:
2656:Boleyn
2647:Boleyn
1783:(talk)
1673:WP:A/R
1601:BURDEN
1398:(talk)
1119:(talk)
964:(talk)
829:WP:AGF
623:attack
42:source
2962:B-bot
2782:B-bot
2726:B-bot
2545:B-bot
2445:Lotus
2396:Lucas
1744:Abuse
1437:...)
1224:false
1153:looks
2966:talk
2861:talk
2786:talk
2730:talk
2660:talk
2623:talk
2584:The
2549:talk
2475:talk
2447:and
2426:talk
2398:and
2377:talk
2351:Cool
2299:talk
2281:and
2203:and
2163:talk
2092:talk
2036:talk
1980:talk
1918:talk
1908:both
1872:here
1850:here
1756:talk
1736:here
1690:talk
1665:part
1652:and
1632:talk
1613:talk
1605:WP:V
1603:and
1564:talk
1536:Re:
1515:talk
1471:talk
1465:) --
1443:talk
1420:talk
1367:both
1363:both
1361:You
1342:talk
1330:knew
1241:842U
1207:here
1172:talk
1138:talk
1077:talk
1060:'His
1056:842U
1042:talk
1021:talk
991:and
932:talk
910:talk
888:talk
872:Talk
806:Talk
786:talk
747:talk
693:talk
644:talk
635:see
602:) |
599:TALK
549:but
460:talk
428:talk
417:and
355:talk
271:talk
253:talk
109:talk
74:talk
3001:).
2949:).
2902:by
2769:).
2713:).
2512:not
2455:FAQ
2406:FAQ
2357:FAQ
2308:Hi
2285:.
2270:).
2113:FAQ
2075:).
2019:).
1959:).
1899:you
1645:six
1547:had
1542:ANI
1435:ask
1260:(3)
1253:not
1236:(2)
1216:new
1203:(1)
841:not
727:FAQ
680:not
576:DRN
570:not
528:.
314:not
156:).
2968:)
2863:)
2788:)
2732:)
2670:.
2625:)
2617:.
2596:,
2551:)
2500:}}
2494:{{
2477:)
2428:)
2379:)
2301:)
2277:,
2252:);
2242:);
2229:}}
2223:{{
2165:)
2094:)
2038:)
1982:)
1920:)
1895:me
1758:)
1721::
1701:ps
1696:−
1692:)
1671:]
1634:)
1619:−
1615:)
1607:.
1566:)
1517:)
1473:)
1445:)
1422:)
1382:,
1344:)
1174:)
1140:)
1079:)
1044:)
1023:)
934:)
912:)
890:)
837:."
788:)
780:--
749:)
719:|
695:)
676:.'
646:)
485:.
462:)
430:)
421:?
357:)
273:)
255:)
111:)
76:)
61:.
54:.
2983:⚠
2964:(
2931:⚠
2859:(
2784:(
2749:⚠
2728:(
2693:⚠
2678:.
2658:(
2621:(
2547:(
2473:(
2461:.
2424:(
2412:.
2375:(
2363:.
2312:,
2297:(
2262:.
2161:(
2119:.
2090:(
2055:⚠
2034:(
1999:⚠
1978:(
1916:(
1762:"
1754:(
1725:"
1699:(
1688:(
1630:(
1611:(
1588:"
1562:(
1513:(
1469:(
1441:(
1418:(
1340:(
1230:.
1196::
1170:(
1136:(
1075:(
1040:(
1019:(
930:(
908:(
886:(
808:)
784:(
745:(
733:.
715:(
691:(
642:(
596:(
515:.
458:(
426:(
375:.
353:(
340:;
326:;
269:(
251:(
128:⚠
107:(
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.