User talk:SlamDiego/Archive 15

2252:

have disagreements with you and think that you are mistakened, but I have not slandered you as you have done with me. You say I talk too much, well sorry, I'll try to talk less, you've said this in an offensive manner, you have accused me of editing with bad faith, you are angry with me because I disagree with you and thus you see EVERYTHING I post now as something to be mistrusted, that is very bad behaviour. Besides I have agreed to a compromise with you concerns that fascism is an "authoritarian or totalitarian nationalist ideology" with a subsequent description of how fascists aspire to form an autocratic, single-party state led by a dictator. Your concern over authoritarian nationalist regimes not being included is justified by taking account of Franco's Spain and other states with affinities to fascist leaders like Mussolini. My concern with "authoritarianism" alone was that we would get people saying "George W. Bush is a fascist because of the Patriot Act", but as long as characteristics of the authoritarianism are shown, I don't have problems. Your concerns were legitimate, they have now been taken into account, I hope your grudge against me will not continue.--

1561: 768: 2297:

have a constant distrust about everything I do. You opened up a finished discussion on the Fascism page about whether Barrack Obama was a fascist, you posted in front of a follow-up remark by another user, and you did it to attack me. I will attempt to be more concise with what I say. Now stop this aggressive behaviour or I will report you for making personal attacks against me.--

44: 2347:?), whereas your personal attacks (in the form of theories about my motives) cannot be supported. Regardless of whether the discussion on Obama was opened or closed (and I've seen no evidence that you convinced any of your opponents that they were wrong), it was hardly ancient, and the statement to which I objected was an 2764:; I clearly state "provided there's no change in relative prices and supply". I'm not implying that there's no such a change actually; the proposition is there only for the sake of the argument. I think there are enough people out there assuming the long-run neutrality of money to make it worth to start with this. 2780:. Under certain circumstances, Paasche index could offer a higher result than Laspeyres index; in fact it will, provided that a greater proportion of the goods whose prices rose faster is now consumed. This is not "expressing the assumption that people behaved atypically", but only acknowledging that, from 2767:

But well, the main point is: given changes in the relative prices of the goods involved, and the subsequent changes in the consumer patterns of spending, that does not guarantee the Laspeyres index to be greater than the Paasche index. It will depend on the particular reaction of the consumer to such

1259:

I've removed your talk page from my watchlist and shall post here no more; unless it is to discuss a change to content or an administrative action carried out by me, I ask that you do the same for my talk page. Incivility and personal attacks I can handle; but life's too short to deal with hypocrisy.

1193:

Please do drop the illusion that you are merely responding to "things that call for reply". It was you who expressed your support for "an indefinite block of any editor who insisted that such explanations be provided" and effectively characterised my actions as "baying at the moon" well before I even

2787:

Well, I think I have exceeded myself writing... I only was surprised by the statement "systematically overstates inflation", and thought: "well, it would depend on the consumers' particular reaction..." Anyway, after reading a lot about it, I don't think this matters so much, as it really holds than

2296:

It is R-41 who said this, you are very angry at me and you should not "hate" anything anyone does. You have been very offensive to me, and I am considering reporting you for personal attacks. I am not the best at speaking, and I may speak to long, but you are harping on that to discredit me, and you

1671:

I don't want you to take this the wrong way, I'm not trying to be rude or anything, I just want to understand what you are saying. Please keep in mind that for many of us here on Knowledge (XXG), English is not our first language. I think that, if you want to be understood (by me at least), it would

1459:

has additional assumed or presumed features. Think of an American as no more than a person from America, and you're dealing with a concept; make him fat and give him a loud mouth, and you're dealing with a conception. If this conception is accepted for a concept, then it becomes impossible to talk

1149:

Since we both claimed at the TfD that the other has misrepresented our own arguments and positions, I would like to briefly address that point. If I have actually misrepresented your position, then I apologise, as that was not my intent (I recognise that it's certainly possible that I misunderstood

1145:

As I mentioned at the TfD, I would like to suggest that we discontinue our debate at the TfD. I think it is clear by now that we will not reach agreement on this issue, and although we obviously disagree on the reasons for this, I think we can both agree that little benefit will come from continued

2251:

You've got a serious grudge against me SlamDiego, you are mad at me for previous arguments and that is why you have returned to a solved problem over a pathetically partisan accusation by someone who declared Obama a fascist, the issue was solved, but you opened it up again to start a fight. I may

979:

without possibly conflicting edits, but I've pretty much carried out the basics of plan, so feel free to make any additions as you see fit. I was thinking of shifting the article form away from being a list and convert it to regular article with more discussion of each index (background, technical

1663:

For example, I thought I understood what historiography meant from the context, then I looked it up in the dictionary, and found out that it's something else all together. And what does 'operationalize as little more than ventilation' mean? Do you mean that this whole discussion is useless except

468:

My concern with the spelling of the word "role" as "rôle" has nothing to do with you or your beliefs about the english language. My concern is that spelling role as rôle is confusing to people who have never encountered it. "rôle" is the french spelling whereas "role" is the english spelling. The

2590:

In the March 15, 2007, Hook story by Courteny Stuart there was no statement that a gang rape had occurred or was believed to have been by the state or the prosecutor, nor was there a statement that Elizabeth Schimpf Sequrro had been raped more than once or was believed to have been by the the

1720:

communicating with third graders, then I wouldn't interact with them as people who ought to be determining the policy for an encyclopedia that was supposed to be authoritative and pitched at adults. And I sure wouldn't want to pretend that I was merely their equal when it came to such a task.

2614:

Instead what I found in the cited Washington Post story was that reporter Kristen Gelineau reported in one place that the prosecutor Claude Worrell stated that unnamed investigators believed something. An alleged belief by unnamed investigators does not constitute an allegation by the State of

2569:

There is no statement in the the March 15, 2007, Washington Post article by Courteney Stuart that the State of Virginia or the prosecutor or the investigators believed that Securro had been drugged. In fact there is no claim anywhere in this article that Securro was drugged by anyone. Reporter

2556:

There is no statement in the March 15, 2007, Washington Post article by Courteney Stuart that the State of Virginia or the prosecutor believed that William Beebe was a member of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity. Nor is there a statement anywhere else in this article that Beebe was a member of that

1758:

In response to your message, the link provided was not directed towards shopping promotions, but instead at the history of the pieces and also as an example of how chalkware is used in modern times. VFA is the only company that is using this Victorian technique and those who are interested in

2205:. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1198:

your comments toward me and my "marked propensit" as opposed to my arguments. I have no problem with you disagreeing with me or characterising my arguments as illogical or ridiculous (it's your opinion), but let's neither of us pretend to be more Catholic than the Pope.

2618:

In the March 15, 2007, Hook story reporter Courteny Stuart states that Deputy Commonwealth Attorney Claude Worrell "declines comment on those other assaults, except to say an investigation is ongoing." This does not constitute an allegation by the State of Virginia.

1659:

I don't want to distract from the conversation over at Econ Wikiproject. I'm not trying to be funny or anything, but you should understand that about half the time, I don't understand what you're trying to say. I may be wrong, but I don't think I'm alone in this.

1222:

the position in question. (By far the worst of the two possibilities.) As to my assertions about your marked propensities, these were exactly propensities to not merely to misinterpret and misrepresent what was thought by others. I wasn't not simply objecting to

2172:

I read the paper. In a former life I was an academic (In the UK) and therefore I am familiar with the standards expected in scholarly works. That paper was... eye-opening... or to put it another way, I'd fail an undergraduate who cited that much from wikipedia.

2625:

Although there was a lot of innuendo in the Washington Post article it appears to me that the Post was fairly careful about what they said about this incident. It is my understanding of Knowledge (XXG) that innuendo has no place in its encyclopedia articles.

2537:

The statement in the article for which I did not find adequate verification after carefully reviewing its cited article, and subsequently reviewing the article cited further down the paragrph, is the first sentence of the "University of Virginia" paragraph—

1537:

Thank you (genuinely) for the note of concern. My blood pressure was higher at an earlier point than now, but I'd be dishonest if I denied that that the discourse indeed gets my back up. And I probably have made whatever productive comments I might make.

1464:

Americans. It's not that we want to avoid conceptions; it's that we don't want them to be presented as the general idea. The assumption or presumption of non-essential features amounts to the deliberate or accidental assumption or presumption of a

1667:

And come on, 'serve as a stalking horse on the other side of which is carried a bell, book, and candle'? That's two metaphors mixed together, both of them I'm unfamiliar with. I googled them, but the sentence still doesn't make sense to me.

2582:

In the the March 15, 2007, Washington Post article by Courteney Stuart even the alleged belief by the unnamed investigators was not that Securro was gang raped by Beebe and members of the fraternity. It was that she was gang raped by

1403:

You use some sophisticated terms which leave be puzzled. I'm familiar (barely) with the difference between history and historiography, so I'll mull that. I'm not familiar wiWhen a layperson says “history”, he or she may mean

2279:

arguments that he uses. If he doesn't want me or anyone else to pick apart his arguments, then he should make sure that they are more genuinely logical, instead of trying to hide their inadequacies by using lots of words.

608:

Thanks for letting me know - for some reason, every time I edit the page trying to fix that, yet more sections are chopped off... Am trying to do it again in stages, using "cut and paste" from other open tabs. Any ideas?

980:

properties, usage). I was also thinking of adding the weighted version of some of the formulas. Aside from those ideas, I don't have anything else planned for the article. I was thinking of making some changes to the main

938:). IMO, a SSP report which does not actually identify any suspected socks is a cut-and-dry attack page, as it makes a serious negative accusation against the editor without any evidence whatsoever to back it up. -- 2841:. The remarks in the article, on the other hand, assume that these indices are measures, and the analysis is very much in the mainstream. So your reference to “Austrian-economics arguments” is grossly incompetent. 1153:

I also apologise if my comments came across as incivil, since (at least initially) they were not written with any sarcastic intent, and I hold no ill will based on the incivility that I perceived in your comments.

1146:

discussion of precisely why we disagree. For the most part, I think we have said all that we can say about the template; the rest, about our conduct or intentions, is ultimately immaterial to the TfD discussion.

2530:

I read your message on my Talk page and noticed your removal of the {{fact}} tag which I had inserted in the Phi Kappa Psi article. (Your subsequent changes to your message were a little hard to keep up with.)

2635:

You are probably aware that if you insist on publishing unsubstantiated, harmful, allegations you risk subjecting yourself and Knowledge (XXG) to possible legal action with potentially severe consequences.

2753:. Reading your huge list af Austrian-economics arguments against mine astonished me, being myself a strong supporter of that school of thought. So I think we have some common premises to start arguing with. 336:

I've commented out the categories on that page because those categories are meant to be for mainspace articles only - when you put the article back, you remove those comment lines out to recategorise them.

2920:. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an 2594:

What Courteny Stuart stated was that "...during the plea hearing, Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Claude Worrell : "Other sexual assaults occurred that night by other individuals in that fraternity,"-

2500:

Thanks for clarifying & fixing this! It wasn’t rendering at all correctly for me (off in mid air), but I’m not familiar with this notation: I knew the TeX, but not where to put it. Thanks again.

992:). I'll be making few edits for a couple weeks, so I thought I'd let you know my plans in case they impacted anything you had planned in this area. Thanks again for your help on these articles.-- 738:

Thanks for the note, anyway. In spite of often seeing threads go the other way (most recent comment at bottom, most indented), I like your format better, and I'll try sticking to that for a while.

2109:

Well, OUP is owned by Rupert Murdoch now, who's American! Anywayz, I'm only kidding around. I ain't gonna emphasize more problems with Americans, or yo might think I'm balmy and kick my ass. :)

1721:

Perhaps more importantly, I'd have to write at great length to say the same things that I've said so far, and there'd be every chance that the audience would simply get lost in the sea of words.

2570:

Kristen Gelineau only implied, but did not say, that based upon the way Securro recounted the events 21 years later she might have been drugged or she might just have had too much to drink.

2578:

there was no statement in the cited stories that Elizabeth Schimpf Sequrro had been gang raped by members of the fraternity or was believed to have been by the Deputy Commonwealth Attorney.

2552:

since there is no allegation in the cited stories that that William Beebe was a member of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, this fact which should be made obvious in the preceding statement.

1514:

I hope I'm wrong, but I think I can feel your blood pressure rising reading your most recent comments in that discussion. If so, I think you can afford to step out of it again for a bit.

389: 378: 1811:? VFA is the largest chalkware companies, and is one of the last three made-in america christmas manufacturers. certainly, that has merit on its own from a historical perspective, no? 2867:

much involved in the writing of the article knows that it will depend upon elasticities — even those who don't know the formal definition of “elasticity” know that it's a question of

2546:

chapter of Phi Kappa Psi drugged seventeen-year-old Elizabeth Schimpf, and that on the morning of 5 October 1984, William Beebe and members of the fraternity gang-raped Miss Schimpf."

975:

Thank you for your help with the math formula markup. I'm too familiar with it, so it took me awhile to get as far as I did. I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to edit the

622:

Fear not. In the end, closing the browser and restarting proved more effective than refreshing my cache or manual edits. I'll have to watch that script in future. Thanks again.

2018:

Hello SlamDiego. I was just curious why you think "British" English is in a worse state than American English? The word "orientate" seems to be okay when it's used properly - and

1011:

Hi. So I actually posted up that origins article (was signing was "ImpIn"), but then I completely forgot... I don't have access to that article -- would you mind sending me it at

588:

Me, too. Thanks for the note. I had hunted down the Krantz bit on my own and alternately grinned and cringed reading it. I'm not letting current arguments bother me, in any case.

2680:

It is likewise disingenuous to read the Worrell remarks as not confirming Schimpf-Seccuro's claim that she was gang-raped. If you want to claim that the state is claiming that

1358:, rather than anything remotely like scientists, when it comes to confronting Austrian School economics (real or alleged). One sees that, for example, in the displacement of 2632:

The allegation in this statement affect the lives of living people—the men who were brothers of that fraternity chapter at that time—and it affects the organization as well.

1489:

OK, gotcha. In principle, I'm all behind that. In practice, sounds very tricky even with the best of intentions. Anyway, I understand what you're getting at now. Thanks.

573:

I have seen your remark about Barzilai. I did not know the criticism by Krantz (not a newcomer...). Seems interesting, independently of the reasons that motivated it! --

1955: 1924: 785: 2622:

A fact not included in the article is that a year and a half later the state of Virginia has evidently not made any allegations against any of the chapter members.

1194:

typed a single word in reply to your "keep" recommendation (your comments were made on 5 September and my replies came on 8 September), and it was you who began to

660: 2974: 1575:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s 2639:

I believe that the wisest course of action is to find citations that verify the statement as written, which evidently is unlikely, or to correct the statement.

2931: 2921: 2662:

The assertion that you flagged doesn't claim that Beebe was a fraternity member (though the words of the State of Virginia actually imply that he was), and

2565:

there is no statement in the cited stories that Elizabeth Schimpf Sequrro had been drugged or was believed to have been by the Deputy Commonwealth Attorney.

641: 722:

As you were commenting here I was commenting to your talk page. (I'll check there for any replies, though I don't think that my comment demands a reply.) —

2749:

I'm the anonymous user (call me Antonio, I'm not enough committed to Knowledge (XXG) as to have my own account, I know this is a handicap here) who wrote

1637:

Thanks for the note. I've removed the tag, but left a note on the talk page which indicates considerable flexibility about disposition of the article. —

2944: 2788:

Laspeyres index usually draws as a result a higher figure than Paasche index. But well, it has nothing to do with calculation attempting to measure the

1150:

what you had written). I also believe that you misrepresented my position, but I believe that it was not deliberate and was caused by misunderstanding.

2912: 2202: 1606:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

1340: 2951: 1611: 2275:

as a substitute for decent argument. Second, I don't have a personal grudge against the person whom I guess you to be — I just hate the absolutely

547:

because it is a change that he or she has effected), or imposes an arbitrary æsthetic. It doesn't correct an article nor add to it substantively. —

2950:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our

1326: 48: 2642:

The statement should be removed or modified immediately, and left out or modified until an appropriate citation is found, if that is possible.

2069:; for example, one can find it being used thus and without irony by editors at the Oxford University Press. There is at least some utility in 2955: 2253: 1818: 1580: 1054: 843: 781: 2206: 2198: 2819: 2418: 704:

Yeah, sorry about that. Conversation rules still aren't entirely clear to me, possibly because there are no hard-and-fast rules? A well.

1576: 835: 2916:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by 2818:

sounds as pedantic in English as it does in Spanish. But, you know, one starts writing an Encyclopedia and just misses the point... --

2210: 1350:

Thanks. I'm not sure that the discussion can possibly be productive. On the one hand, there are a lot of nuts who embrace what they

839: 1615: 385: 2629:

Clearly the statement that you or someone else has put into this Knowledge (XXG) article is not fully supported by these citations.

804: 323:. I think the main question's been resolved, but you might want to decategorize your userspace draft to avoid confusion! Regards, 1759:

researching that matter should be permitted to see the links that were provided along with images of the stages of development.

1121: 578: 446:

did not blank the page. I simply used the undo function on two minor leg-lift edits; a bug in the software blanked the page. —

2693:

the office of the Commonwealth Attorney had allowed someone against whom there was a damning case to enter into a plea bargain

2560:

Similarly there is not statement that he was a member of the fraternity in the March 15, 2007, Hook story by Courteny Stuart.

1231:. (In other words, we have yet another of your misrepresentations here.) Now, please do not bay at the moon on my talk page. — 269: 257: 245: 221: 209: 197: 185: 173: 2463: 1568: 1053:

I just saw that AfD you mentioned for Edward P. Felt. Thanks for mentioning it. There’s an active one for Lauren Grandcolas

680: 2724:

the matter will be to draw more eyes to the article; and is likely to get you blocked much as would your overt vandalism. —

1527: 1502: 1433: 1336: 880: 161: 149: 137: 125: 113: 101: 89: 77: 65: 2917: 1775: 1370:

articles on Austrian School economists. Anyway, I have focussed my contributions on articles where the significance of

976: 348: 292:

This editor has too many irons in the fire, and may be suddenly inactive on Knowledge (XXG) for indeterminate intervals.

1965:

to say that I'd use the VFA reference if it were merely up to me, but to say that whatever gets used has to conform to

1584: 2237: 313: 2967: 2611:

That phrase indicates an official act made in the name of the state by a government official authorized to do so.

574: 2691:

The phrase “by the state of Virginia” is perfectly standard. The Deputy Commonwealth Attorney was explaining why

777: 2947:; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. 1693:

A statement of ostensible consensus should neither operationalize as little more than ventilation nor serve as a

1683: 2645:

If you are unwilling to make that correction immediately, please replace the {{fact}} tag that you removed.

2493: 2257: 1330: 1016: 520: 2884:

As to your use of the word “abstruse”, I have no problem with it. Rather, I have a problem with your getting

2201:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the 1822: 1218:

There's no illusion on my part. As to the support for a block that I expressed, that was before you actually

756: 495:

If you don't know what a leg-lift edit is, then don't claim in your summaries to be reverting a leg-lift edit.

2823: 2422: 1600: 2178: 2158: 1627: 1814: 1763: 1097:

Thanks, I agree :p I actually just recently changed my username to this and was shocked it wasn't taken. --

792: 2653: 2543: 2233: 2218: 1679: 1412:; the failure to make a distinction is a source of real grief. The term “histoth the distinction between 1061: 1619: 320: 2833:

First of all, the Austrian School tends to reject the use of price indices altogether, seeing prices as

800: 626: 613: 327: 2319:

of philosophical tests. By all means, go ahead and try reporting me for personal attacks; what I have

1287:

Since I've never commented to your talk page, it's a bit petty for you to ask me to not to do so. Not

2756:

You say I'm "making unrecognized “simplifying” assumptions that are here inappropriate". But my first

1107: 432: 1631: 2983: 2894: 2730: 2472: 2369: 2286: 2133: 2127:

No, I'm a hard-core American, and might yell at you but would never get violent over speech acts. —

2095: 2004: 1979: 1793: 1787:

I visited that site before removing the link. It was essentially just a promotion for that firm. —

1740: 1643: 1592: 1544: 1475: 1392: 1301: 1237: 1179: 1169:

I don't know why you persist in referring to sarcasm or to mockery, as if either were required for

1081: 989: 959: 919: 856: 822: 728: 669: 553: 504: 452: 410: 365: 17: 2721: 2715: 1599:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

2924:

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

2435: 2271:

who you are, since this message is signed with an IP number, though I can guess from your use of

2174: 2154: 1999:

Dispite our rocky introduction, I am glad that we are now working together to resolve this issue.

1623: 1572: 1038: 997: 943: 934:

FYI, I had Blackeagles' aborted and malformed attempts at SSP reports deleted as attack pages (

2649: 2587:. Beebe was not accused nor were Phi Kappa Psi fraternity members accused of gang raping her. 2542:"It is alleged by the state of Virginia that, on the night of 4 October 1984, a member of the 2214: 2035: 1675: 1523: 1498: 1429: 1262: 1201: 1159: 1057: 876: 743: 709: 687: 649: 593: 1970: 1873: 1865: 1861: 1607: 2963: 2750: 2509: 1771: 1383: 1173:. In any case, if you stop writing things that call for reply, then I will stop replying. — 796: 623: 610: 478: 345: 324: 2451: 935: 884: 1933: 1902: 1460:

about thin or quiet Americans; at best, one could talk about thin or quite people who are

1099: 428: 2315:; your assertion that I should not hate anything that anyone does couldn't withstand the 1966: 1958: 1879:

I think that the issue is this: You want Knowledge (XXG) to use what you think to be the

1711:

might operationalize as little more than ventilation, that really wouldn't be worrisome.)

1379: 393: 850:. It isn't particularly fair to send me to the wrong page for replying to the charge. — 2978: 2958:. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. 2889: 2725: 2467: 2364: 2302: 2281: 2128: 2090: 2000: 1974: 1788: 1735: 1638: 1539: 1470: 1387: 1296: 1232: 1174: 1076: 985: 954: 914: 851: 817: 723: 664: 548: 499: 447: 397: 360: 2988: 2899: 2827: 2735: 2700:

Your actions in deleting a relevant citation and spuriously tagging that section were

2513: 2477: 2437: 2426: 2374: 2306: 2291: 2261: 2241: 2222: 2182: 2162: 2138: 2122: 2100: 2070: 2019: 2008: 1984: 1826: 1798: 1779: 1745: 1648: 1549: 1531: 1506: 1480: 1437: 1397: 1354:

to be Austrian School economics. On the other hand, the mainstream begin acting like

1344: 1306: 1266: 1242: 1205: 1184: 1163: 1132: 1086: 1065: 1043: 1022: 1001: 964: 947: 924: 889: 861: 827: 747: 733: 713: 691: 674: 653: 630: 617: 597: 582: 558: 526: 509: 482: 457: 436: 417: 370: 353: 331: 2704:; you're just the latest in a series of guys who have tried to censor that article. 2432: 1033: 993: 939: 2534:

I also noticed that you repaired a broken link in my last edit. Thank you for that.

1846:. It's not as spammy as the VFA link, but I wouldn't restore it if it were deleted. 1560: 640:

There's an active (though likely to be speedy closed) Request for username comments

2673:

a drug, it is disingenuous to read the article at MSNBC and that of 12 Dec 2006 at

2573:

There is no mention of drugs in the March 15, 2007, Hook story by Courteny Stuart.

2116: 2111: 2029: 2024: 1515: 1490: 1421: 871: 870:

I've responded to the sock puppetry case you created in regards to Blackeagles. ---

739: 705: 683: 645: 589: 488:

As noted in the discussion that you claim to have read, “rôle” is English, and the

2875:

elasticities, and the article advisedly and explicitly referred and refers to the

2442:

I'd be more than happy to let this drop, if you (or some other admin) would tell

1703:

so plainly the reference is to “A statement of ostensible consensus”, not to the

2959: 2505: 1767: 1012: 981: 910: 903: 767: 474: 470: 339: 43: 2850:

of your assumptions. However, the fact that you presumed that relative prices

2446:

that he doesn't get a pass to insult other editors (even as he complains that

1195: 2329:

my remarks that you have been both illogical and needlessly verbose have been

1961:, the former might be unacceptable and the latter deemed suitable. Which is 816:

You have not properly filed. Let me know when you have followed procedure. —

2443: 2298: 1752: 1672:

be helpful if you tried pretending that you are writing for third graders.

2666:

earlier. Neither sloppy reading nor attacking straw men will work for you.

473:

is in english, not french. Also, I have no idea what a leg-lift edit is. --

2814:. Of course, English is not my native language, but I should have guessed 2077:, as “orient” long ago broadened in meaning so as not to plainly refer to 2906:

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg}

2194: 2188: 2937:

That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

392:. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to 543:

that is either purely horizontal (such that even the editor prefers it

2557:

fraternity. Rather he was identified as "a student she didn't know".

2934:

on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.

1325:

In case you missed it, there's a discussion about Austrian economics

2854:

be unchanged in a typical scenario entails assumptions that you did

2339:(notice how in the above message you give your theory of my motives 1734:

unhappy with the extent to which you need things explained to you. —

902:

Okay. Thank you. I'm very glad that someone else with a memory of

1420:. Can you point me towards something which can help me understand? 2450:

are engaged in personal attacks). The next time that he violates

2355:

it closed discussion, then it did so inappropriately. Don't just

1842: 1808: 319:

Someone was wondering about something in your userspace earlier -

1853:

whether VFA is important; if the reference itself is essentially

2943:

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an

2784:

point of view, one cannot discard certain rational behaviours.

2607:

the use of the phrase "by the state of Virginia" is misleading.

1697:

on the other side of which is carried a bell, book, and candle.

784:

for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with

2796:, and so on, one can find when start studying this matters... 984:

article, but I'm going to attack some related articles first (

1443:

I'm not sure whither I might point, so I'll just explain. A

1014:? By the way, apologies again for accusing you of vagueness. 304:

Click the “+” tab or this sentence to start a new discussion.

2768:

a change in relative prices and the purchasing power (i.e.,

2677:

as not reporting a claim that she was given a drugged drink.

2323:

is needless verbosity and transparent illogic. I'd be very

1864:, which is why an article on it was deleted. Please review 1610:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1559: 390:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive

379:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive

2973:

Persons interested in this matter might read my remarks at

2049:. We might argue over whether the word “orientate” can be 1707:

about stating the consensus. (As to the possibility that a

1378:

significance of the Austrian School is readily defended by

1366:(real or alleged), and in the claim that there are somehow 359:

Thanks! I just didn't have my brain in gear on that one! —

2311:

Your theories about my motives are childish and incorrect

1587:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 321:

Knowledge (XXG):Help desk#About this article - is it fake?

2806:

you make fun of, I'm sorry if it just makes my text even

2247:

Please stop your grudge and personal attacks against me.

2022:(that's a US dictionary, right?) seems to accept it. :) 1579:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 38: 2394: 2390: 1957:

was something that we wouldn't use at all. But, under

302: 1868:, as what one might ordinarily regard as establishing 2431:

You aren't helping matters. Please just let it drop.-

1936: 1926:

was the best reference, and one that we would use if

1905: 1410:

what is reported by historians and how it is reported

782:

Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/User:SlamDiego

2954:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 2688:

raped, I suggest that you find supportive citations.

2327:

if you reported me for personal attacks, given that

2053:

used (the concerns of the Merriam-Webster not being

1374:

Austrian School economists is not relevant, and the

679:

I thought as much, you may also want to have a look

1969:(which, in turn, is part of the infrastructure for 1329:. I haven't weighed in since I don't know much it. 2397:get you? Now, as the admin advised you, focus on 1949: 1918: 661:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Grazon 2846:Second, no one claimed that you didn't recognize 2041:British English is in worse shape because it has 2888:by your own invocation of a technical measure. — 1971:the “notability” requirements of Knowledge (XXG) 1862:the “notability” requirements of Knowledge (XXG) 840:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/SlamDiego 1895:. Indeed, we could probably find a case where 492:orthography in some authoritative dictionaries. 2714:here that doesn't entail your refraining from 2061:English), but in British English it is widely 1860:Nonetheless, I would note that VFA hasn't met 1655:Half the time, I don't understand what you say 1295:suggestion that I might engage in hypocrisy. — 2975:File talk:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg 2794:baskets with the same utility as the original 2523:Reply to "2008 December" on Talk:Led by truth 427:I assume you didn't mean to blank the page. 396:status and we would like your input. Thanks! 8: 2905: 388:, I would like to direct your attention to 2776:). But this reaction cannot be determined 1876:(hence my habit of using quotation marks). 659:Thank you. That's actually a response to 287: 25: 1995:Thank you for reorganizing Phi Kappa Psi! 1941: 1935: 1910: 1904: 2913:File:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg 2720:The principal result of any attempt to 2454:by claiming that I'm acting based on a 1654: 1571:template has been added to the article 844:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/ 1556:Proposed deletion of Don't! Buy! Thai! 1049:Edward P. Felt & Lauren Grandcolas 953:Okay, thank you for letting me know. — 836:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets 636:Because no one seems to have told you… 1664:that we get to vent our frustration? 7: 1032:Sorry. Forgive my mistake. Regards. 2772:, although I acknowledge it sounds 2664:this distinction has been discussed 2602:against Elizabeth Schimpf Sequrro. 1730:your pronouncements have been, I'm 2802:P.S: Concernig my use of the term 1930:were determining policy, and that 1028:Re:Mis-identification as vandalism 1007:Origins of neoclassical economics? 788:before editing the evidence page. 644:. Just thought you ought to know. 24: 1585:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 913:) has looked over the evidence. — 2918:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 1967:the policy on “reliable sources” 766: 42: 2591:Deputy Commonwealth Attorney. 1809:http://www.pinholeresource.com/ 314:User:SlamDiego/E. M. Washington 298: 2956:media copyright questions page 2009:22:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1985:23:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1872:doesn't necessarily establish 1827:22:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1799:20:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1780:18:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1746:01:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1684:23:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1649:08:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1632:07:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1550:17:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1532:17:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 1507:00:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1481:20:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1451:idea, and nothing that is not 1438:17:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1307:01:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1267:01:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1243:00:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1206:00:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 834:Also, the transcluded link on 464:Marginalism, role and leg-lift 1: 2989:17:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 2968:17:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 2900:21:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2828:19:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2736:00:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 2401:. In particular, let's have 2292:04:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 2262:22:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 2242:15:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 2223:05:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 2153:yes yes I did. good catch. -- 1840:I'm not defending the use of 1618:, where it may be deleted if 1398:23:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1345:22:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1321:Austrian economics discussion 1185:22:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1164:18:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1157:I hope you have a good day. – 762: 2952:criteria for speedy deletion 2514:22:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 2478:05:15, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 2438:03:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 2427:03:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 2413:, and that isn't needlessly 2375:04:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 2343:, and threaten to report me 2307:01:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2183:00:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 2163:08:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 2139:03:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 2123:17:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 2101:12:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 2065:with the general meaning of 2036:11:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 977:List of price index formulas 41: 2492:Re: Hamfisted notation at “ 1581:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1555: 1386:” is awash in footnotes.) — 56:Some messages may be found 3005: 2792:increase in prices, using 2760:you criticise are all but 2209:. Reviewers' concerns are 1883:references, but being the 1133:06:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 384:Since you are a member of 371:15:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 354:12:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 332:12:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2197:has been nominated for a 2081:; but “orientate” with a 1849:It really doesn't matter 1608:proposed deletion process 1087:10:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 1066:09:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 965:20:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 948:19:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 925:20:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 890:18:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 862:02:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 828:01:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 776:You have been accused of 748:21:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 734:21:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 714:21:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 700:Ruud Binnekamp format fix 692:20:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 675:20:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 654:20:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 631:00:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 618:00:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 598:06:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 583:06:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 559:06:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 518:What is a leg-lift edit? 377:Requesting your input at 2910:Thank you for uploading 2494:Quantity theory of money 2232:Jest dune watt eye can. 1899:agreed that a reference 1612:speedy deletion criteria 1455:to that general idea; a 1075:opinion on the matter. — 1071:Alright, I've expressed 1044:15:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 1023:08:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 1002:03:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 527:08:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 510:21:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 483:15:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 458:03:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 437:03:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 418:15:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 258:the seventeenth orc hive 2199:featured article review 2087:mindless back-formation 2085:definition arises as a 1327:over at the WikiProject 1138:Notable Wikipedians TfD 270:the eighteenth orc hive 222:the fourteenth orc hive 2932:non-free use rationale 2544:University of Virginia 2462:will post a notice to 1959:Knowledge (XXG) policy 1951: 1920: 1857:, it isn't acceptable. 1622:to delete is reached. 1577:criteria for inclusion 1564: 246:the sixteenth orc hive 234:the fifteenth orc hive 2869:how consumers respond 2405:that is supported by 2075:definition in the M-W 2014:Orienting one's words 2013: 1952: 1950:{\displaystyle R_{2}} 1921: 1919:{\displaystyle R_{1}} 1616:Articles for Deletion 1614:or it can be sent to 1563: 1291:petty, however, as a 786:notes for the suspect 575:Fioravante Patrone en 539:A leg-lift edit is a 386:WikiProject Economics 186:the eleventh orc hive 2810:, or makes it sound 1934: 1903: 642:with your name on it 210:the unlucky orc hive 198:the twelfth orc hive 138:the seventh orc hive 2945:image copyright tag 2863:Third, pretty much 1843:pinholeresource.com 1364:appeal to consensus 990:hedonic price index 150:the eighth orc hive 102:the fourth orc hive 78:the second orc hive 18:User talk:SlamDiego 2706:You have no actual 2669:Even were alcohol 1947: 1916: 1565: 1380:“reliable sources” 780:. Please refer to 267: 255: 243: 231: 219: 207: 195: 183: 174:the tenth orc hive 171: 162:the ninth orc hive 159: 147: 135: 126:the sixth orc hive 123: 114:the fifth orc hive 111: 99: 90:the third orc hive 87: 75: 66:the first orc hive 63: 2464:Wikiquette alerts 2234:Chris the speller 2045:more thoughtless 1817:comment added by 1783: 1766:comment added by 1689:The sentence was 1573:Don't! Buy! Thai! 1569:proposed deletion 1519: 1494: 1425: 1360:scientific method 1196:repeatedly orient 1042: 888: 842:, rather than to 809: 795:comment added by 774: 773: 310: 309: 297: 296: 276: 275: 265: 253: 241: 229: 217: 205: 193: 181: 169: 157: 145: 133: 121: 109: 97: 85: 73: 61: 37: 36: 2996: 2986: 2930:That there is a 2897: 2871:— but there are 2746:Dear SlamDiego: 2733: 2598:a gang rape and 2504:Nils von Barth ( 2475: 2372: 2289: 2203:featured quality 2136: 2119: 2114: 2098: 2032: 2027: 1982: 1956: 1954: 1953: 1948: 1946: 1945: 1925: 1923: 1922: 1917: 1915: 1914: 1891:reference isn't 1866:these guidelines 1845: 1829: 1796: 1782: 1760: 1743: 1646: 1598: 1597: 1591: 1547: 1517: 1492: 1478: 1423: 1395: 1384:Marginal utility 1333: 1304: 1240: 1182: 1129: 1128: 1117: 1115: 1106: 1103: 1084: 1036: 1021: 1019: 962: 922: 874: 859: 825: 808: 789: 770: 763: 731: 672: 556: 525: 523: 507: 455: 416: 413: 400: 394:Featured Article 368: 352: 351: 299: 288: 46: 39: 26: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2987: 2982: 2908: 2898: 2893: 2744: 2734: 2729: 2525: 2498: 2476: 2471: 2373: 2368: 2359:to be concise; 2290: 2285: 2267:First, I don't 2249: 2230: 2192: 2170: 2151: 2137: 2132: 2117: 2112: 2099: 2094: 2030: 2025: 2020:Mirriam Webster 2016: 1997: 1983: 1978: 1937: 1932: 1931: 1906: 1901: 1900: 1841: 1812: 1797: 1792: 1761: 1756: 1744: 1739: 1695:stalking horse 1657: 1647: 1642: 1595: 1589: 1588: 1558: 1548: 1543: 1479: 1474: 1396: 1391: 1331: 1323: 1305: 1300: 1241: 1236: 1183: 1178: 1140: 1131: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1111: 1108: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1085: 1080: 1051: 1030: 1017: 1015: 1009: 973: 963: 958: 923: 918: 860: 855: 826: 821: 790: 761: 732: 727: 702: 673: 668: 638: 606: 571: 557: 552: 521: 519: 508: 503: 466: 456: 451: 442:True. Indeed, 425: 411: 408: 398: 382: 369: 364: 344: 338: 317: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3002: 3000: 2992: 2991: 2981: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2935: 2907: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2892: 2881: 2880: 2860: 2859: 2843: 2842: 2799:Kind regards. 2743: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2728: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2689: 2678: 2667: 2548: 2547: 2524: 2521: 2519: 2517: 2516: 2497: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2470: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2367: 2284: 2254:129.100.249.17 2248: 2245: 2229: 2226: 2191: 2186: 2169: 2166: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2131: 2104: 2103: 2093: 2015: 2012: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1977: 1944: 1940: 1913: 1909: 1877: 1858: 1847: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1819:24.151.131.167 1802: 1801: 1791: 1755: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1738: 1723: 1722: 1713: 1712: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1641: 1557: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1542: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1484: 1483: 1473: 1401: 1400: 1390: 1382:. (Note that “ 1322: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1299: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1235: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1188: 1187: 1177: 1139: 1136: 1119: 1109: 1094: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1079: 1050: 1047: 1029: 1026: 1008: 1005: 986:cost of living 972: 969: 968: 967: 957: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 917: 895: 894: 893: 892: 865: 864: 854: 831: 830: 820: 812: 772: 771: 760: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 726: 701: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 684:Adam McCormick 667: 646:Adam McCormick 637: 634: 605: 602: 601: 600: 570: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 551: 532: 531: 530: 529: 513: 512: 502: 496: 493: 465: 462: 461: 460: 450: 424: 421: 381: 375: 374: 373: 363: 316: 311: 308: 307: 295: 294: 286: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 274: 273: 262: 261: 250: 249: 238: 237: 226: 225: 214: 213: 202: 201: 190: 189: 178: 177: 166: 165: 154: 153: 142: 141: 130: 129: 118: 117: 106: 105: 94: 93: 82: 81: 70: 69: 58: 57: 53: 52: 51: 47: 35: 34: 31: 30: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3001: 2990: 2985: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2948: 2946: 2936: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2901: 2896: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2837:but not true 2836: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2820:83.49.181.184 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2800: 2797: 2795: 2791: 2785: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2765: 2763: 2762:unreckognized 2759: 2754: 2752: 2747: 2742:Price indices 2741: 2737: 2732: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2718:that section. 2717: 2712: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2694: 2690: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2655: 2651: 2646: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2609: 2608: 2603: 2601: 2597: 2592: 2588: 2586: 2580: 2579: 2574: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2561: 2558: 2554: 2553: 2545: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2532: 2528: 2522: 2520: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2495: 2491: 2479: 2474: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2458:or somesuch, 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2419:24.255.35.102 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2376: 2371: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2288: 2283: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2246: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2227: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2175:Cameron Scott 2167: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2155:Cameron Scott 2148: 2140: 2135: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2115: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2079:pointing east 2076: 2074: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2034: 2033: 2028: 2021: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1994: 1986: 1981: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1942: 1938: 1929: 1911: 1907: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1810: 1807:more so than 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1754: 1751: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1691: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1650: 1645: 1640: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1624:benjicharlton 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1602: 1601:its talk page 1594: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1562: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1482: 1477: 1472: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1447:is truly the 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1406:what happened 1399: 1394: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1328: 1320: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1204: 1203: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1137: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1118: 1114: 1105: 1104: 1092: 1088: 1083: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1048: 1046: 1045: 1040: 1035: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1013: 1006: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 978: 970: 966: 961: 956: 952: 951: 950: 949: 945: 941: 937: 926: 921: 916: 912: 909: 906:'s behavior ( 905: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 891: 886: 882: 878: 873: 869: 868: 867: 866: 863: 858: 853: 849: 847: 841: 837: 833: 832: 829: 824: 819: 815: 814: 813: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 787: 783: 779: 769: 765: 764: 758: 755: 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 730: 725: 721: 718: 717: 716: 715: 711: 707: 699: 693: 689: 685: 682: 678: 677: 676: 671: 666: 662: 658: 657: 656: 655: 651: 647: 643: 635: 633: 632: 629: 628: 625: 620: 619: 616: 615: 612: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 586: 585: 584: 580: 576: 568: 560: 555: 550: 546: 542: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 528: 524: 517: 516: 515: 514: 511: 506: 501: 497: 494: 491: 487: 486: 485: 484: 480: 476: 472: 463: 459: 454: 449: 445: 441: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 422: 420: 419: 414: 407: 406: 404: 395: 391: 387: 380: 376: 372: 367: 362: 358: 357: 356: 355: 350: 347: 343: 342: 334: 333: 330: 329: 326: 322: 315: 312: 306: 305: 301: 300: 293: 290: 289: 285: 271: 264: 263: 259: 252: 251: 247: 240: 239: 235: 228: 227: 223: 216: 215: 211: 204: 203: 199: 192: 191: 187: 180: 179: 175: 168: 167: 163: 156: 155: 151: 144: 143: 139: 132: 131: 127: 120: 119: 115: 108: 107: 103: 96: 95: 91: 84: 83: 79: 72: 71: 67: 60: 59: 55: 54: 50: 45: 40: 33: 32: 28: 27: 19: 2949: 2942: 2911: 2909: 2885: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2838: 2834: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2801: 2798: 2793: 2789: 2786: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2770:elasticities 2769: 2766: 2761: 2757: 2755: 2748: 2745: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2705: 2701: 2692: 2685: 2684:people were 2681: 2674: 2670: 2663: 2650:Led by truth 2647: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2634: 2631: 2628: 2624: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2606: 2604: 2599: 2595: 2593: 2589: 2584: 2581: 2577: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2562: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2549: 2536: 2533: 2529: 2526: 2518: 2499: 2459: 2455: 2447: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2349:equivocation 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2333:demonstrably 2332: 2331: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2250: 2231: 2215:Andrew Kelly 2193: 2171: 2152: 2110: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2072: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2023: 2017: 1998: 1962: 1927: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887:or even the 1884: 1880: 1874:“notability” 1869: 1854: 1850: 1757: 1731: 1728:unrestrained 1727: 1717: 1708: 1704: 1696: 1692: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1605: 1566: 1513: 1466: 1461: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1408:or may mean 1405: 1402: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1324: 1292: 1288: 1263:Black Falcon 1261: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1202:Black Falcon 1200: 1170: 1160:Black Falcon 1158: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1123: 1112: 1100: 1096: 1093:RE: Username 1072: 1058:Steve8675309 1052: 1031: 1010: 974: 933: 907: 845: 811: 778:sockpuppetry 775: 757:Sockpuppetry 719: 703: 639: 627: 621: 614: 607: 572: 544: 540: 489: 467: 443: 426: 402: 401: 383: 340: 335: 328: 318: 303: 291: 277: 233: 2922:explanation 2774:mathletical 2758:assumptions 2716:vandalizing 2702:transparent 2648:Thank you. 2527:SlamDiego, 2415:long-winded 2341:three times 2313:speculation 2228:Corrections 2149:marxist.org 1855:advertising 1813:—Preceding 1762:—Preceding 1356:shaved apes 1102:Darth Mike 982:price index 971:Price index 797:Blackeagles 791:—Preceding 624:Bencherlite 611:Bencherlite 604:CfD closure 471:marginalism 469:article on 423:Marginalism 325:Bencherlite 2879:responses. 2858:recognize. 2722:wikilaywer 2615:Virginia. 1893:sufficient 1870:notability 1726:Given how 1709:discussion 1705:discussion 1593:dated prod 1457:conception 1418:conception 1376:historical 1293:preëmptive 1225:ad hominem 1171:incivility 936:WP:CSD#G10 429:NawlinWiki 2979:SlamDiego 2890:SlamDiego 2808:abstruser 2726:SlamDiego 2468:SlamDiego 2365:SlamDiego 2282:SlamDiego 2273:verbosity 2129:SlamDiego 2091:SlamDiego 2001:Tmpafford 1975:SlamDiego 1897:you and I 1789:SlamDiego 1753:Chalkware 1736:SlamDiego 1639:SlamDiego 1620:consensus 1540:SlamDiego 1471:SlamDiego 1453:intrinsic 1388:SlamDiego 1297:SlamDiego 1233:SlamDiego 1227:, but to 1175:SlamDiego 1077:SlamDiego 955:SlamDiego 915:SlamDiego 852:SlamDiego 848:SlamDiego 818:SlamDiego 724:SlamDiego 665:SlamDiego 549:SlamDiego 500:SlamDiego 490:preferred 448:SlamDiego 361:SlamDiego 49:Orc Hives 29:Contents 2886:confused 2865:everyone 2839:measures 2816:abstruse 2812:sardonic 2804:abstruse 2782:a priori 2778:a priori 2710:recovery 2675:the Hook 2605:FOURTH, 2563:SECOND, 2433:Andrew c 2407:evidence 2337:accurate 2321:attacked 2195:Ron Paul 2189:Ron Paul 2063:accepted 2055:confined 2051:properly 2043:accepted 1815:unsigned 1776:contribs 1764:unsigned 1368:too many 1124:Contribs 1034:Oda Mari 994:Bkwillwm 940:Jaysweet 805:contribs 793:unsigned 2877:typical 2873:typical 2585:someone 2576:THIRD, 2550:FIRST, 2411:logical 2403:content 2399:content 2317:mildest 1732:already 1449:general 1445:concept 1414:concept 1372:current 1142:Hello. 740:Cretog8 706:Cretog8 590:Cretog8 2960:STBotI 2506:nbarth 2456:grudge 2452:WP:AGF 2361:do it. 2325:amused 2073:narrow 2067:orient 2059:proper 1768:LukeMV 1583:" and 1467:theory 1462:almost 911:Grazon 904:Grazon 838:is to 569:Thanks 541:change 475:Klaser 341:x42bn6 2852:could 2835:ranks 2790:ideal 2682:other 2345:twice 2277:lousy 2168:Paper 2083:broad 2047:cruft 1716:If I 1518:RETOG 1493:RETOG 1424:RETOG 1362:with 1352:think 1229:libel 846:User: 720:Haha! 260:, or 16:< 2964:talk 2848:some 2824:talk 2751:this 2686:also 2654:talk 2510:talk 2448:they 2444:R-41 2423:talk 2409:and 2393:did 2391:what 2303:talk 2299:R-41 2269:know 2258:talk 2238:talk 2219:talk 2213:. -- 2211:here 2207:here 2179:talk 2159:talk 2118:idea 2071:the 2031:idea 2005:talk 1973:). — 1889:only 1885:best 1881:best 1851:here 1823:talk 1772:talk 1718:were 1680:talk 1628:talk 1416:and 1220:took 1113:Talk 1062:talk 1039:talk 998:talk 944:talk 801:talk 759:case 744:talk 710:talk 688:talk 681:here 650:talk 594:talk 579:talk 545:only 479:talk 433:talk 412:talk 399:Gary 349:Mess 346:Talk 2977:. — 2856:not 2671:not 2600:not 2596:not 2508:) ( 2466:. — 2417:. — 2389:So 2357:try 2113:Wik 2089:. — 2057:to 2026:Wik 1963:not 1469:. — 1335:| ( 908:qua 885:WRE 872:J.S 663:. — 405:ing 268:in 256:in 244:in 232:in 220:in 208:in 196:in 184:in 172:in 160:in 148:in 136:in 124:in 112:in 100:in 88:in 76:in 64:in 2984:←T 2966:) 2895:←T 2826:) 2731:←T 2656:) 2512:) 2473:←T 2425:) 2395:it 2370:←T 2353:if 2351:; 2305:) 2287:←T 2260:) 2240:) 2221:) 2181:) 2173:-- 2161:) 2134:←T 2096:←T 2007:) 1980:←T 1928:we 1825:) 1794:←T 1778:) 1774:• 1741:←T 1682:) 1676:lk 1644:←T 1630:) 1603:. 1596:}} 1590:{{ 1567:A 1545:←T 1530:) 1505:) 1476:←T 1436:) 1393:←T 1343:) 1339:- 1332:II 1302:←T 1289:as 1238:←T 1180:←T 1120:• 1082:←T 1073:my 1064:) 1056:. 1018:II 1000:) 988:, 960:←T 946:) 920:←T 857:←T 823:←T 807:) 803:• 746:) 729:←T 712:) 690:) 670:←T 652:) 596:) 581:) 554:←T 522:II 505:←T 481:) 453:←T 435:) 366:←T 272:. 248:, 236:, 224:, 212:, 200:, 188:, 176:, 164:, 152:, 140:, 128:, 116:, 104:, 92:, 80:, 68:, 2962:( 2822:( 2695:. 2652:( 2496:” 2460:I 2421:( 2363:— 2301:( 2280:— 2256:( 2236:( 2217:( 2177:( 2157:( 2003:( 1943:2 1939:R 1912:1 1908:R 1821:( 1770:( 1678:( 1626:( 1538:— 1528:c 1526:/ 1524:t 1522:( 1520:8 1516:C 1503:c 1501:/ 1499:t 1497:( 1495:8 1491:C 1434:c 1432:/ 1430:t 1428:( 1426:8 1422:C 1341:c 1337:t 1260:– 1199:– 1127:) 1110:( 1060:( 1041:) 1037:( 996:( 942:( 887:) 883:/ 881:C 879:/ 877:T 875:( 799:( 742:( 708:( 686:( 648:( 592:( 577:( 498:— 477:( 444:I 431:( 415:) 409:( 403:K 266:· 254:· 242:· 230:· 218:· 206:· 194:· 182:· 170:· 158:· 146:· 134:· 122:· 110:· 98:· 86:· 74:· 62:·

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index