238:
136:
454:
356:
coverage from trusted secondary sources (Academic articles, Reviewed journals, "trusted" news sources, etc) So some references are better than no references. but odds are if there isn't second parties covering the topic. it won't meet the notability threshold. There's a great article that covers this better then I explain it here
444:, I readed "Nomination withdrawn Boleyn (talk) 06:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)" but in the page of ArpON appears again "This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy.". Is there a new problem with policies of WP? Thank you. Spikeyrock, 15:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
379:
So like I said I can't make the judgment on the article, you'd want to discuss that in the AFD (articles for deletion) page. I was just offering some guidelines for you. I'll check out the article and see if I should change my vote though. no one editor decides if articles get deleted or not, we work
323:
that covers how notable things should be to be considered to be in
Knowledge (XXG). Also another problem is the article doesn't have any references. I hope that regardless of the outcome in the deletion process you consider being active on Knowledge (XXG) there is something here for everyone. If you
355:
Hey Spikey, so the main problem with references to the manual in Ubuntu is that we would consider that a primary source (just like information from the website itself would be considered primary) when what we ideally want to see to show notability is a secondary source, for example if there was News
295:
I'm sorry but I don't understand what is the problem of ArpON page with WP policies. This page describes correctly the principal keys of the ArpON Open source project as all others Free
Software projects describe in the WP. The all informations about ArpON has been take from the original web site of
399:
no problem, Knowledge (XXG) is a community everyone's article was their first at one time. I was really impressed with the break down on the references getting exact pages on multiple books and really flushed it out. looks a lot better. as a guideline the way an article looks doesn't mean something
339:
Hi Bryce, I just modified the page of ArpON where I added the references from ubuntu.com e books.google.com. Now the page of ArpON is the same of the page of
Arpwatch (I used this page as model because this page has not problems with WP policies):
264:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
483:
489:
314:
Hey Spikey, first off let me say welcome to
Knowledge (XXG)! I'm glad that you're here. about your question on your article that is currently up for deletion. the best place to discuss the deletion is going to be
268:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
496:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
458:
316:
250:
78:
202:
400:
is notable, but when you can get lots of references from secondary sources its a good sign of notability, If you have time you can always check out
73:
261:
64:
on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
375:
With the new references from books, research articles and web site, is the page of ArpON ok? Thank you. Spikeyrock, 19:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
319:
but let me give you some help. the problem with the article looks like a notability problem the guideline has an article you can read here
426:
488:
482:
206:
112:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out
304:
This page is not to commercial scope because ArpON is born as Open source project for the Open source community with BSD license.
26:
83:
68:
42:
194:
147:
198:
34:
254:
88:
22:
105:
430:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as
409:
385:
365:
329:
466:
422:
156:
109:
465:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
462:
210:
113:
98:
48:
401:
163:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be
405:
381:
361:
325:
441:
395:
Of course, thank you so much for you time and patience. Spikeyrock, 19:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
505:
177:
274:
218:
121:
57:
357:
164:
419:
Hi, I would tell thank you so much for your work! Spikeyrock, 10:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
360:
it's a great read and really outlines the sort of references needed to form an article.
52:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
480:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
320:
93:
501:
270:
214:
117:
181:
187:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
509:
453:
434:
413:
389:
369:
333:
278:
222:
125:
404:
your talent as an editor and knowledge in the area could help a lot.
380:
with discussion to try and reach a general agreement among everyone.
40:
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called
474:
285:
245:
229:
143:
30:
324:
have any questions feel free to ask I'm happy to help you out.
299:
442:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ArpON
46:. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
134:
249:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) according to
343:
243:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
205:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
170:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
351:Thank you. Spikeyrock, 16:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
310:Thank you. Spikeyrock, 14:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
33:, may not conform to some of Knowledge (XXG)'s
307:Please, can you describe which is the wrong?
8:
262:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/ArpON
116:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
420:
104:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
469:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
251:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
477:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
176:notice, but please explain why in your
155:I couldn't establish that this meets
7:
89:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
165:deleted for any of several reasons
150:because of the following concern:
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
344:https://en.wikipedia.org/Arpwatch
260:The article will be discussed at
492:) located above the edit window.
487:
481:
452:
348:What other fix can I do for WP?
236:
74:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
1:
79:Biographies of living persons
300:http://arpon.sourceforge.net
84:How to write a great article
37:, and may not be retained.
209:allows discussion to reach
190:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
173:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
525:
461:. When you add content to
459:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
414:18:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
390:18:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
370:15:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
334:14:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
279:12:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
223:11:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
201:exist. In particular, the
131:Proposed deletion of ArpON
126:11:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
510:14:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
435:09:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
195:proposed deletion process
114:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
253:or whether it should be
288:for deletion (my reply)
182:the article's talk page
21:Hello, Spikeyrock, and
139:
207:articles for deletion
148:proposed for deletion
138:
402:Portal:Free software
440:Hi, in this page:
199:deletion processes
140:
69:Your first article
43:Your first article
27:your contributions
448:Your recent edits
437:
425:comment added by
516:
491:
485:
456:
240:
239:
192:
191:
175:
174:
137:
62:
56:
524:
523:
519:
518:
517:
515:
514:
513:
467:sign your posts
450:
290:
241:
237:
234:
203:speedy deletion
189:
188:
172:
171:
135:
133:
60:
54:
19:
12:
11:
5:
522:
520:
494:
493:
478:
449:
446:
417:
416:
393:
392:
373:
372:
337:
336:
289:
284:Nomination of
282:
235:
233:
228:Nomination of
226:
213:for deletion.
193:will stop the
161:
160:
132:
129:
110:sign your name
102:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
76:
71:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
521:
512:
511:
507:
503:
500:Thank you. --
498:
490:
484:
479:
476:
472:
471:
470:
468:
464:
460:
455:
447:
445:
443:
438:
436:
432:
428:
427:93.33.107.242
424:
415:
411:
407:
406:Bryce Carmony
403:
398:
397:
396:
391:
387:
383:
382:Bryce Carmony
378:
377:
376:
371:
367:
363:
362:Bryce Carmony
359:
354:
353:
352:
349:
346:
345:
341:
335:
331:
327:
326:Bryce Carmony
322:
318:
313:
312:
311:
308:
305:
302:
301:
297:
296:the project:
293:
287:
283:
281:
280:
276:
272:
266:
263:
258:
256:
252:
248:
247:
231:
227:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
185:
183:
179:
168:
166:
159:
158:
157:WP:NOTABILITY
153:
152:
151:
149:
145:
130:
128:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
70:
67:
66:
65:
63:
59:
51:
50:
45:
44:
38:
36:
32:
28:
24:
16:
499:
495:
451:
439:
421:— Preceding
418:
394:
374:
350:
347:
342:
338:
309:
306:
303:
298:
294:
291:
267:
259:
244:
242:
232:for deletion
197:, but other
186:
178:edit summary
169:
162:
154:
142:The article
141:
103:
53:
47:
41:
39:
20:
463:talk pages
457:Hello and
106:Wikipedian
94:Help pages
35:guidelines
473:Add four
211:consensus
146:has been
108:! Please
423:unsigned
99:Tutorial
49:Teahouse
17:Welcome!
502:SineBot
292:Hello,
255:deleted
58:help me
23:welcome
475:tildes
358:WP:NOR
271:Boleyn
215:Boleyn
180:or on
118:Boleyn
286:ArpON
246:ArpON
230:ArpON
144:ArpON
31:ArpON
506:talk
431:talk
410:talk
386:talk
366:talk
330:talk
321:WP:N
317:here
275:talk
219:talk
122:talk
486:or
508:)
433:)
412:)
388:)
368:)
332:)
277:)
257:.
221:)
184:.
167:.
124:)
61:}}
55:{{
504:(
429:(
408:(
384:(
364:(
328:(
273:(
217:(
120:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.