471:
Rajput idenity didnt exist If he quote from
Prithviraj Vijay Tablot or Jackson cant be Finall authority on Prithviraj. Also Romila Thapar call Prithviraj vijay a Work of Rajput courts and it revolved around Rajput valour Anyway Also Work of Chattopadhaya says Rajput idenity became prominent in 12th and 13th century learn to Give page numbers of specific Book Not entire book on Section. Give page number learn to cite sources properly and Try to Edit Your Sources on Prithviraj Chauhan and Other Rajput Clan page but in Better manner with refrences and page number and Better explaination of what u want to convey.
150:
574:
686:
181:
108:
69:
23:
607:
237:
Text present about Rajput
Warriors or Rajput valour or Present Chauhans or Prithviraj as Rajput Something like this Not Original Work. I suggest u a book by Kaushik Roy which suggest that Prithviraj Vijay a Contemparary Text present us about Rajput Warriors u can use that on talk page instead of Original Search of Al Masudi.Thanks
499:
Like these Source of Satish
Chandra Mention Gurjara Pratiharas As Rajput kingdom in 10th century on page 19 u can quote His sources on That Page Of Pratiharas instead of Brittanica But Firsts read Book and Learn to cite refrences In Systematical manner Please Learn Citing Source Tutorial on Knowledge
358:
Page By Same User
Chariotder. If u want to readd Please do with Consensus With talk team anyway Ur source too was a aceadmic one Its unlikely They Will add As it is not acc to their Natrative Anyway That Guy seriously has problem with Rajput related Articles.If u can Try to readd that source. Cheers.
236:
i want to tell you that recently u was in edit conflict on
Prithviraj Page about Rajput identity but i want to inform u that U should add sources From Secondary Sources instead of Primary work More like u Should Add a Source and use on Talk Page which mention like Prithviraj Vijay or Contemparary
552:
u made some good contribution But u didnt add ref properly like name of Author year of book and in
Bibliography section,Also u copy paste entire Battle part Please add brief details instead of So Much Stuff it need brief summary i Added Content Too Removing misinforamtion like his death Place he
470:
article has been removed because u dont know how To Cite
Sources properly Kindly listen carefully, U Need to Tell the Caste haters especially likes of Chariotder Anyway U Need to say that Kaushik Roy state that Prithviraj Vijay present Us about Rajput Warriors and Chahaman Rajput Clan So How can
317:
U can quote this work of
Chattopadhaya too if u want it say Rajput Became prominent in 12th and 13th century. U can thus add Prithviraj as Rajput king with these sources with practical explaination by u.Anyway user on wikipedia dont like anything against Their Agenda or Narrative.
553:
never return to
Chittor after khanuwa defeat and died in Kalpi in Up as part of his oath. I add those datas and many more from reliable sources If someone revert those kindly u readd them but keep in minding adding about ref details with book section. Bye have a good time.
528:
Here is
Chandra book from Page 19 to 22 he states about Rajput Dynasties in Early medieval Period and didnt mention anchronism U can cite these if u wish on Rajput dynasties Page But read book first from Page number 19 and try to find more
41:, which is against Knowledge's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
485:
Also try to add Multiple source again which says Rajput originate in prominemce in 9th century or Something like These with Secondary sources and then challenge the versiomnand dont quote Raj era sources.
378:
article too. I was able to get him blocked once, since he was reverting my well referenced work. Please stick to good references and facts, and fight this unfounded hatred towards Hindus and Rajputs.--
530:
486:
472:
360:
554:
322:
299:
238:
127:, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
509:
201:
534:
490:
476:
364:
578:
693:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
418:
298:
U can quote this work of Romila Thapar too also which mentions about Prithviraj vijay which present about Rajput Valour see also call them Rajput epics.
287:
This work of Kaushik Roy states that Prithviraj Vijay present Chamans as Rajputs and Present about Rajput warriors it cant be used by U if u like.
268:
518:
277:
80:
without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an accurate
648:
558:
326:
303:
242:
112:
30:
312:
291:
50:
412:
383:
84:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
132:
42:
38:
644:
154:
664:
408:
379:
193:
46:
640:
615:
58:
438:
This matter is very serious please take against such who are continuously writing contents against 1 community.
197:
85:
123:. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Knowledge
135:. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.
116:
630:
626:
622:
690:
678:
660:
711:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
723:
712:
218:
205:
128:
124:
97:
89:
54:
26:
694:
448:
587:
467:
355:
189:
140:
34:
393:
Brother report him he already has engaged in edit warring 4-5 times on rathore and rajput pages
313:
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Zcyho16xzWEC&q=Rajput#v=snippet&q=Rajput&f=false
292:
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=PnBMFaGMabYC&q=Rajput#v=snippet&q=Rajput&f=false
515:
452:
274:
81:
441:
On jadeja page why would a muslim convert to Hinduism in that time and claim himself rajput.
88:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
705:
654:
422:
394:
336:
252:
233:
170:
719:
214:
185:
93:
73:
704:. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
444:
Rana of Bharat tried and gave a lot of information but still there was no action taken.
43:
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say
505:
701:
582:
136:
643:. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
625:
that was created to violate Knowledge policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
196:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
120:
511:
Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526) - Part One
149:
700:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
166:
77:
549:
447:
You guys are can ask proper authority to block them and take down their page.
211:
727:
689:
Hello, Sungpeshwe9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
668:
592:
562:
538:
494:
480:
456:
430:
402:
387:
368:
344:
330:
307:
260:
246:
222:
174:
143:
101:
62:
685:
180:
107:
68:
22:
606:
581:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
407:
Can you please drop all your references here i will revert his edits
375:
270:
Military Thought of Asia: From the Bronze Age to the Information Age
321:
If these sources help u i am grateful then. Bye ☺️☺️☺️☺️😊😊😊.
204:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
601:
188:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
49:
for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
157:
when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
200:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
639:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
163:
548:
Hello Sungpeshwe9 I recently saw Your contribution to
119:content to one or more Knowledge articles, such as
76:. I noticed that you recently removed content from
354:Ur well sourced content has been removed again on
374:Chariotrider is poorly sourced, and is spamming
8:
718:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge.
129:Knowledge:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources
708:of the content if it meets requirements.
531:2401:4900:40A1:2BEC:9D9F:3DFE:65C7:6D63
487:2401:4900:40A1:2BEC:9D9F:3DFE:65C7:6D63
473:2401:4900:40A1:2BEC:9D9F:3DFE:65C7:6D63
361:2401:4900:40B7:99A6:2384:CAFF:2D6A:ABFA
555:2401:4900:40B7:99A6:4310:259:3A55:D5C4
323:2401:4900:40A8:53F:7F8B:752F:4F1C:9FE4
300:2401:4900:40A8:53F:7F8B:752F:4F1C:9FE4
239:2401:4900:40A8:53F:7F8B:752F:4F1C:9FE4
579:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
33:, but in one of your recent edits to
7:
577:There is currently a discussion at
115:. It seems that you may have added
14:
37:, it appears that you have added
684:
605:
572:
179:
148:
106:
67:
21:
462:Learn to Use Refrences Properly
350:Removal of Well sourced Content
45:. Please be prepared to cite a
251:Thank you i will look into it
1:
669:22:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
593:21:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
539:13:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
495:13:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
481:13:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
457:12:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
431:07:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
403:04:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
388:02:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
223:17:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
175:16:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
563:15:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
369:16:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
345:06:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
331:06:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
308:06:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
261:06:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
247:06:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
144:15:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
131:, including the usage of an
102:08:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
63:05:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
192:, but you didn't provide a
743:
641:may be reverted or deleted
514:. Har-Anand Publications.
267:Kaushik Roy (2020-11-04).
202:tutorial on citing sources
51:tutorial on citing sources
649:guide to appealing blocks
657:|Your reason here ~~~~}}
426:
398:
340:
256:
728:08:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
651:, then adding the text
335:Thank you so much sir
228:Prithviraj Chauhan Page
125:guideline on plagiarism
614:This account has been
647:by first reading the
629:, but using them for
409:OnlyTruthShallPrevail
380:OnlyTruthShallPrevail
159:User talk:Sungpeshwe9
294:from page 111 to 124
133:attribution template
27:Welcome to Knowledge
691:Draft:Deval Rajputs
679:Draft:Deval Rajputs
153:Please remember to
677:Concern regarding
544:Rana Sanga article
468:Prithviraj Chauhan
466:Hello Ur Edits on
356:Prithviraj Chauhan
198:include a citation
190:Amar Singh Rathore
113:your contributions
35:Prithviraj Chauhan
31:your contributions
674:
673:
645:appeal this block
520:978-81-241-1064-5
279:978-1-000-21079-8
155:assume good faith
39:original research
734:
688:
661:NinjaRobotPirate
658:
609:
602:
590:
585:
576:
575:
524:
283:
183:
152:
110:
71:
29:. We appreciate
25:
742:
741:
737:
736:
735:
733:
732:
731:
682:
652:
600:
588:
583:
573:
570:
546:
521:
504:
464:
352:
280:
266:
230:
194:reliable source
55:Chariotrider555
47:reliable source
19:
12:
11:
5:
740:
738:
681:
675:
672:
671:
610:
599:
596:
569:
566:
545:
542:
526:
525:
519:
506:Satish Chandra
463:
460:
391:
390:
351:
348:
296:
295:
285:
284:
278:
229:
226:
111:Thank you for
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
739:
730:
729:
725:
721:
716:
714:
709:
707:
703:
698:
696:
695:article space
692:
687:
680:
676:
670:
666:
662:
656:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
628:
624:
620:
619:
617:
611:
608:
604:
603:
598:December 2020
597:
595:
594:
591:
586:
580:
567:
565:
564:
560:
556:
551:
543:
541:
540:
536:
532:
522:
517:
513:
512:
507:
503:
502:
501:
497:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
478:
474:
469:
461:
459:
458:
454:
450:
445:
442:
439:
436:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
414:
410:
405:
404:
400:
396:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
357:
349:
347:
346:
342:
338:
333:
332:
328:
324:
319:
315:
314:
310:
309:
305:
301:
293:
290:
289:
288:
281:
276:
273:. Routledge.
272:
271:
265:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
244:
240:
235:
227:
225:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
182:
177:
176:
172:
168:
165:
164:
160:
156:
151:
146:
145:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:public domain
114:
109:
104:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
70:
65:
64:
60:
56:
53:. Thank you.
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
17:December 2020
16:
717:
710:
706:userfication
699:
683:
636:
632:illegitimate
631:
618:indefinitely
613:
612:
571:
547:
527:
510:
498:
484:
465:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
415:
406:
392:
353:
334:
320:
316:
311:
297:
286:
269:
250:
231:
209:
206:my talk page
178:
162:
158:
147:
121:Udai Singh I
105:
90:my talk page
82:edit summary
66:
20:
423:Sungpeshwe9
395:Sungpeshwe9
337:Sungpeshwe9
253:Sungpeshwe9
234:Sungpeshwe9
184:Hello, I'm
78:Gaur Rajput
72:Hello, I'm
720:FireflyBot
623:sockpuppet
568:ANI notice
550:Rana Sanga
215:Heba Aisha
210:This edit
186:Heba Aisha
94:Heba Aisha
92:. Thanks.
74:Heba Aisha
500:for more
635:reasons
584:Alivardi
529:sources.
508:(2004).
435:Hi All,
419:contribs
137:utcursch
702:CSD G13
659:below.
655:unblock
627:allowed
616:blocked
449:Jbinsan
86:sandbox
637:is not
589:(talk)
376:Jadeja
232:Hello
167:Drmies
621:as a
724:talk
713:here
665:talk
559:talk
535:talk
516:ISBN
491:talk
477:talk
453:talk
427:talk
413:talk
399:talk
384:talk
365:talk
341:talk
327:talk
304:talk
275:ISBN
257:talk
243:talk
219:talk
171:talk
141:talk
98:talk
59:talk
421:)
726:)
715:.
697:.
667:)
653:{{
561:)
537:)
493:)
479:)
455:)
429:)
401:)
386:)
367:)
343:)
329:)
306:)
259:)
245:)
221:)
208:.
173:)
161:.
139:|
100:)
61:)
722:(
663:(
557:(
533:(
523:.
489:(
475:(
451:(
425:(
416:·
411:(
397:(
382:(
363:(
339:(
325:(
302:(
282:.
255:(
241:(
217:(
169:(
96:(
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
