677:
1055:
1465:
1150:
having this discussion if the page wasn't up for deletion/ If you look at that conversation, they are all Keeps and Strong keeps. The originator of the deletion has even changed their opinion to Keep and not Delete. This is an obvious snowball at this point. Why belabor the obvious? It is wasting all of our time that we could be putting to good use.
472:
887:
I have read them and you couldn't be more wrong. I have made no threats and have no conflict of interest. This is wasting everyone's time I (like you) want accuracy. If you want to see bad form, look at some of the posts in the deletion thread. Some of the editors are being unhelpful. it is all there
836:
I am not the one 'edit warring' I have correct information. The other editors are warring they need to be issued the warning. Isn't that the purpose? Putting plain true facts out there? I think editors working in concert together is shameful. We are supposed to work together right? I don't know the
1265:
You came very close to violating 3RR, which is why you were warned. Not to mention you should not have been undoing other users' edits anyway, due to your conflict of interest. Also, I believe you misinterpreted my comment; I was not suggesting your edits were vandalism. Finally, I am again confused
1213:
The edit is minor and not in the least controversial. It is a fact. I also think if "edit warring" is going on it is universal. I want only plain & concise facts. Doesn't everyone? I am not a even a Major
Contributor to the article as you can plainly see. I have to move along for the moment, but
837:
subject well enough that I cant edit this page with plain simple substantiated facts. Like you said NeilN the name controversy is "iffy". It is incorrect. A 3 year old article (the only one on the internet) is not substantial. There are hundreds of other articles in the direction of what is correct.
1149:
I have no conflict of interest. I am more than qualified to edit any page. It would seem wise to me for all editors to err on the side of caution. ie- Don't use a very flimsy, iffy and old article to change a page. A simple internet search will yield you hundreds of current articles. We wouldn't be
1077:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
856:
linked above. I would strongly suggest reading it immediately. You already have at least three reverts on the article within a 24hr period, and are definitely edit-warring. No other editor has gotten close to warring, so they did not receive the warning. When you say "I think editors working in
1247:
I did not violate 3RR. Don't even suggest vandalism. What has been done to this page with false accusations and unmerited removal requests is ridiculous. You, yourself said you would vote to keep. Look at the big picture and look for a pattern under RRF on the
Removal edit page. Cheers
907:. You state that you personally know the subject of the article, yet you continued to edit the article and make controversial edits (to the point of edit warring with other users). I am at least glad that you clarified that there was no legal threat contained in
1165:
As you have stated that you personally know the subject, that is most certainly a conflict of interest. Also I'm confused as to why you're talking about the AfD, as that has no bearing on the conversation at all; I would vote to keep the article as well.
926:
A piece of (unsolicited) advice: If you want something changed, argue content, not the behavior of other editors. That will rarely get you to your goal. Look at the current name discussion on the talk page. Focused on content and moving ahead smoothly.
993:
I have edited here in the past under different user names. I take offence to your allegations. I am just getting started up again. I would say you are the one that is propelling this in the wrong direction. I will not be called an SPA
1009:
You have not disclosed any of your other accounts. Judging by your account creation time and user contributions (all the information that is presented), you very closely fit the definition of a
1135:
As per your own admission, you appear to have a conflict of interest on this article and a close connection to the subject. Therefore I would heavily advise against directly editing it.
1421:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there!
948:
yes, lets move ahead smoothly- Don't doubt my veracity. I read them. I would say an acquaintance you have met is not the same as knowing and spending time with someone ie Family
40:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
1180:
Not well enough that I cant edit a simple page. As for the article we are of one mind then. This is a big waste of all of our time. Facts are only useful when they are correct
1059:
822:
by accusing other editors of having a "vendetta". Making such accusations without any actual evidence is simply not conducive to a good editing environment on
Knowledge.
62:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about
Knowledge, you might want to consider being "
168:
1404:
1229:
Undoing other user's (non-vandalism) edits is not minor, but rather by definition controversial. It is also clear by your comment that you still have not read
1403:
600:
212:
71:
865:
and simply want it to comply with
Knowledge policies and contain the best information. Finally, I would suggest you also read the guidelines on
554:
153:
1079:
190:
963:
I would dispute that. Looking at the date that your account was created, as well as your contributions (the entirety of which center around
220:
59:
648:
or have permission to release the photo under a free license. Once uploaded, let me know and I'll help you get it into the article. --
447:
199:
608:
1266:
as to why you are bringing up the AfD again. I did not participate in that discussion and it has no bearing on the matter at hand.
1199:
states, you shouldn't make controversial edits to the article, of which the ones you made in which you edit warred certainly were.
861:(another Knowledge guideline I would highly suggest you read before proceeding). I myself found the article after it was listed on
968:
58:
1113:
1074:
1063:
501:
399:
208:
186:
37:
1067:
724:
566:
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
527:
263:
203:
499:
to
Knowledge! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of
1319:
You are absolutely wrong. But, I wont hold it against you. I have been wrong before. I hope we work together in the future
363:
313:
1092:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
736:
692:
575:
541:
496:
376:
331:
317:
120:
1478:
1334:
If you really have been an editor in the past, you should know by now how to use colons, and you really ought to read
1128:
740:
534:
439:
300:
765:
545:
513:
476:
471:
395:
291:
237:
233:
130:
746:
590:
259:
1426:
482:
421:
417:
242:
1489:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
1121:
1117:
339:
254:
195:
83:
1511:
2014. The DVD debuted at number 1 on the '''''Billboard''''' Music Video Sales Chart.<ref name=LOC: -->
1343:
1112:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
732:
704:
684:
570:
326:
295:
224:
112:
63:
31:
596:
434:
385:
381:
372:
368:
67:
49:
1530:
1062:
your contributions to
Knowledge, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
607:(~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out
520:
430:
267:
229:
53:
1127:
For information on how to contribute to
Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
728:
696:
688:
322:
308:
250:
159:
1353:
I know what you are insinuating and you really ought to observe decorum. Your input is not useful.
1433:
1422:
1418:
585:
304:
163:
116:
79:
1078:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
699:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
1282:
Lastly... I have no COI. You should have a look at the Afd though. Informative reading. Cheers
1444:
1339:
1298:
1230:
1047:
972:
964:
853:
670:
391:
358:
75:
1297:
The fact that you continue to say that after already admitting to a personal connection with
852:
Hi Thewho, it appears from your response that you have not yet read
Knowledge's guideline on
1085:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
779:
74:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
1013:. I am not trying to insult you, I am simply stating something and imploring you to follow
1526:
1522:
1469:
1307:
1268:
1235:
1201:
1168:
1138:
1019:
981:
939:
913:
875:
870:
858:
824:
815:
811:
801:
752:
660:
623:
443:
1381:
1369:
1354:
1335:
1320:
1283:
1249:
1215:
1181:
1151:
1099:
1032:
995:
979:, the latter of which you certainly have not done in the context of your edit warring.
949:
889:
838:
558:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
425:
246:
70:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
1373:
1302:
1196:
1014:
1010:
976:
904:
866:
862:
580:
335:
148:
1440:
126:
1368:
I was insinuating that you need to learn how to use colons, and you ought to read
903:
You state that you have read them, however I am wondering if you have truly read
537:, a central location for images where they can be used on all Knowledge projects?
1098:
to the
Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
774:
1521:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
810:
In addition to your edit-warring, admitted conflict of interest, and potential
928:
790:
649:
612:
714:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
519:...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are
1380:
Perhaps you should read it. Because it is exactly what you NOT are doing.
1301:
and edit warring on that page solidifies the fact that you have not read
727:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
1054:
1534:
1448:
1389:
1362:
1347:
1328:
1313:
1291:
1274:
1257:
1241:
1223:
1207:
1189:
1174:
1159:
1144:
1040:
1025:
1003:
987:
957:
942:
919:
897:
881:
846:
830:
804:
783:
758:
712:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
663:
626:
87:
971:. Due to this, you are expected to conform to Knowledge's policies of
1482:
1108:
so that you do not accidentally breach Knowledge's content policies.
857:
concert together is shameful." I repudiate that as an assumption of
505:
show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Knowledge.
604:
470:
772:
is vague but could be interpreted as threatening legal action. —
637:
1439:
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,
1233:. You were only one that got close to violating the 3RR rule.
723:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
278:
99:
24:
1517:
http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/music-video</ref: -->
675:
739:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
552:
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
1503:{{Infobox album | ;!-- See Knowledge:WikiProject_Albums --
636:
Hi, you can upload a photo by following the instructions
1090:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
967:), I would say that you clearly fit the definition of a
1490:
1486:
1474:
908:
819:
769:
873:, as you appear to be crossing both of those as well.
731:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
1073:
All editors are required to comply with Knowledge's
764:
Additionally, please review the Knowledge guideline
1485:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just
718:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
78:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
1498:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
1129:our frequently asked questions for organizations
533:...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to
52:and ask your question there. Please remember to
1372:as well. Nothing more! Perhaps you should read
1082:and writing with as little bias as possible.
8:
789:Please, please, please use the talk page. --
548:- at least until you get the hang of things?
66:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
1395:Thewho515, you are invited to the Teahouse
595:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
683:You currently appear to be engaged in an
1415:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
1472:. I have automatically detected that
7:
743:. If you engage in an edit war, you
528:copyright violations very seriously
1376:as well. -09:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
705:Knowledge's policy on edit warring
512:...wikipedia has a very stringent
14:
611:or ask me on my talk page. NeilN
609:Knowledge:Where to ask a question
1463:
1402:
1214:have great rest of your evening.
1053:
57:
20:
169:Request administrator attention
703:Please be particularly aware,
691:with others, to avoid editing
1:
1066:on Knowledge, you may have a
644:make sure you took the photo
571:The five pillars of Knowledge
213:Biographies of living persons
113:The five pillars of Knowledge
95:
1431:
1118:verifiability of information
1479:Quadrophenia Live in London
888:in black and white..read on
555:New contributors' help page
234:Policy for non-free content
154:New contributors' help page
1550:
1523:these opt-out instructions
1400:
546:"files for upload" process
221:Simplified Manual of Style
149:Frequently Asked Questions
56:on talk pages by clicking
603:on talk pages using four
1535:05:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
1449:16:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
1390:10:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1385:
1363:06:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1358:
1348:05:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1329:03:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1324:
1314:03:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1292:03:12, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1287:
1275:03:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1258:03:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1253:
1242:02:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1224:02:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1219:
1208:02:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1190:02:36, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1185:
1175:02:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1160:02:23, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1155:
1145:01:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1046:Conflict of interest on
1041:03:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1036:
1026:03:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1004:02:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
999:
988:02:46, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
958:02:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
953:
943:02:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
920:02:36, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
898:02:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
893:
882:02:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
847:02:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
842:
831:02:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
814:, you are also assuming
805:01:59, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
784:01:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
759:01:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
697:try to reach a consensus
687:. Users are expected to
664:23:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
627:23:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
88:16:55, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
1491:my operator's talk page
768:. Your edit summary in
733:appropriate noticeboard
364:Help develop an article
178:Policies and Guidelines
1106:Exercise great caution
1064:you have written about
969:single-purpose account
680:
508:Did you know that ...
495:Hello, Thewho515, and
487:
1114:neutral point of view
1075:neutral point of view
1058:Hello, Thewho515. We
679:
540:...we recommend that
475:The Wikipede and the
474:
209:What Knowledge is not
187:Neutral point of view
1481:may have broken the
1068:conflict of interest
1031:fair enough. cheers
977:conflict of interest
867:conflict of interest
386:Translating articles
296:Adopt-a-user program
264:Conflict of interest
204:No original research
1427:I'm a Teahouse host
766:WP:No legal threats
526:...wikipedia takes
314:No personal attacks
1434:Visit the Teahouse
737:dispute resolution
681:
576:How to edit a page
488:
382:Join a WikiProject
377:Requested articles
359:Be bold in editing
318:Resolving disputes
121:Your first article
38:your contributions
29:Hello, Thewho515!
1456:
1455:
1451:
1299:Suzannah Lipscomb
1048:Suzannah Lipscomb
965:Suzannah Lipscomb
909:this edit summary
820:this edit summary
671:Suzannah Lipscomb
535:Wikimedia Commons
502:your recent edits
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
301:Assume good faith
275:
274:
225:Three-revert rule
94:
93:
1541:
1516:
1508:
1494:
1467:
1466:
1438:
1436:
1417:Be our guest at
1406:
1399:
1398:
1310:
1271:
1238:
1204:
1171:
1141:
1080:reliable sources
1057:
1022:
984:
935:
934:
916:
878:
827:
797:
796:
755:
678:
669:Edit warring on
656:
655:
619:
618:
564:
563:
514:image use policy
477:Picture Tutorial
440:Useful templates
292:Community Portal
279:
238:Image use policy
191:Reliable sources
100:
96:
61:
46:
45:
25:
21:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1512:
1504:
1473:
1464:
1461:
1452:
1437:
1432:
1397:
1308:
1269:
1236:
1202:
1169:
1139:
1122:autobiographies
1051:
1020:
982:
932:
930:
914:
876:
825:
794:
792:
753:
741:page protection
676:
674:
653:
651:
634:
629:
616:
614:
591:Manual of Style
561:
560:
468:
410:
350:
323:Build consensus
284:
260:Deletion policy
179:
141:
131:upload an image
105:
104:Getting Started
90:
43:
42:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1547:
1545:
1519:
1518:
1509:
1500:
1499:
1460:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1416:
1409:
1407:
1396:
1393:
1378:
1377:
1351:
1350:
1317:
1316:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1245:
1244:
1211:
1210:
1178:
1177:
1131:. Thank you.
1110:
1109:
1103:
1100:Knowledge:Spam
1093:
1050:
1044:
1029:
1028:
991:
990:
946:
945:
923:
922:
885:
884:
834:
833:
787:
786:
721:
720:
715:
700:
673:
667:
633:
630:
601:sign your name
594:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
550:
549:
538:
531:
524:
517:
469:
467:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
437:
428:
412:
411:
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
388:
379:
366:
352:
351:
348:
345:
344:
343:
342:
329:
320:
311:
298:
286:
285:
282:
276:
273:
272:
271:
270:
257:
243:External links
240:
227:
217:
216:
215:
206:
200:Citing sources
193:
181:
180:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
166:
156:
151:
143:
142:
139:
136:
135:
134:
133:
123:
107:
106:
103:
92:
91:
54:sign your name
36:Thank you for
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1546:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1515:
1510:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1492:
1488:
1487:edit the page
1484:
1480:
1476:
1471:
1458:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1435:
1430:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1414:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1394:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1209:
1206:
1205:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1136:
1132:
1130:
1125:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1097:
1096:Avoid linking
1094:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1049:
1045:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
989:
986:
985:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
961:
960:
959:
955:
951:
944:
941:
940:
937:
936:
925:
924:
921:
918:
917:
910:
906:
902:
901:
900:
899:
895:
891:
883:
880:
879:
872:
871:legal threats
868:
864:
860:
855:
851:
850:
849:
848:
844:
840:
832:
829:
828:
821:
817:
813:
812:legal threats
809:
808:
807:
806:
803:
802:
799:
798:
785:
781:
777:
776:
771:
767:
763:
762:
761:
760:
757:
756:
750:
749:from editing.
748:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
719:
716:
713:
710:
709:
708:
706:
701:
698:
694:
690:
686:
672:
668:
666:
665:
662:
661:
658:
657:
647:
643:
639:
631:
628:
625:
624:
621:
620:
610:
606:
602:
598:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
568:
567:
565:
557:
556:
547:
543:
539:
536:
532:
529:
525:
522:
518:
515:
511:
510:
509:
506:
504:
503:
498:
493:
492:
486:
484:
478:
473:
465:
449:
445:
441:
438:
436:
432:
429:
427:
423:
419:
416:
415:
414:
413:
409:Miscellaneous
407:
406:
401:
397:
393:
390:Cleaning up:
389:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
367:
365:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
347:
346:
341:
340:Mailing lists
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
321:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:The Community
281:
280:
277:
269:
265:
261:
258:
256:
255:Sock puppetry
252:
248:
244:
241:
239:
235:
231:
228:
226:
222:
219:
218:
214:
210:
207:
205:
201:
197:
196:Verifiability
194:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
176:
175:
170:
167:
165:
164:make requests
161:
160:ask questions
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
138:
137:
132:
128:
124:
122:
118:
114:
111:
110:
109:
108:
102:
101:
98:
97:
89:
85:
81:
80:Theroadislong
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
39:
35:
34:to Knowledge!
33:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
1520:
1513:
1505:
1462:
1419:the Teahouse
1412:
1410:
1379:
1352:
1340:Roxy the dog
1318:
1306:
1281:
1267:
1246:
1234:
1212:
1200:
1179:
1167:
1148:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1126:
1111:
1105:
1095:
1089:
1084:
1072:
1052:
1030:
1018:
992:
980:
947:
938:
929:
912:
886:
874:
854:edit warring
835:
823:
800:
791:
788:
773:
751:
744:
722:
717:
711:
702:
693:disruptively
682:
659:
650:
645:
641:
635:
622:
613:
559:
553:
551:
507:
500:
494:
490:
489:
483:image credit
480:
448:User scripts
422:Disambiguity
357:
349:Things to do
336:IRC channels
327:Village pump
140:Getting Help
76:edit summary
41:
30:
1468:Hello, I'm
689:collaborate
632:Photo Usage
562:{{Help me}}
521:copyrighted
373:Peer review
369:Maintenance
127:edit a page
68:WikiProject
1527:BracketBot
1525:. Thanks,
1470:BracketBot
1309:Artichoker
1270:Artichoker
1237:Artichoker
1231:WP:EDITWAR
1203:Artichoker
1170:Artichoker
1140:Artichoker
1021:Artichoker
983:Artichoker
973:neutrality
915:Artichoker
877:Artichoker
826:Artichoker
754:Artichoker
597:Wikipedian
581:Help pages
435:Talk pages
431:User pages
418:Categories
268:Notability
230:Copyrights
158:Where to:
44:{{helpme}}
1475:your edit
1459:July 2014
1413:Thewho515
1382:Thewho515
1355:Thewho515
1321:Thewho515
1284:Thewho515
1250:Thewho515
1216:Thewho515
1182:Thewho515
1152:Thewho515
1033:Thewho515
996:Thewho515
950:Thewho515
890:Thewho515
859:bad faith
839:Thewho515
816:bad-faith
770:this edit
729:consensus
725:talk page
695:, and to
599:! Please
542:new users
400:Vandalism
309:Etiquette
251:Vandalism
50:talk page
1423:Jtmorgan
1344:resonate
735:or seek
707:states:
685:edit war
646:yourself
586:Tutorial
544:use our
491:Welcome!
466:Welcome!
332:Signpost
305:Civility
125:How to:
117:Tutorial
48:on your
17:Welcome!
1441:HostBot
1370:WP:SOCK
1336:WP:SOCK
1060:welcome
747:blocked
745:may be
497:welcome
392:General
64:adopted
32:Welcome
1483:syntax
1374:WP:AGF
1303:WP:COI
1197:WP:COI
1120:, and
1015:WP:COI
905:WP:COI
863:WP:ANI
775:C.Fred
642:Please
605:tildes
1506:: -->
444:Tools
426:Stubs
1531:talk
1445:talk
1386:talk
1359:talk
1325:talk
1288:talk
1254:talk
1220:talk
1186:talk
1156:talk
1037:talk
1000:talk
975:and
954:talk
931:Neil
894:talk
869:and
843:talk
793:Neil
780:talk
652:Neil
638:here
615:Neil
396:Spam
247:Spam
84:talk
72:here
1477:to
1411:Hi
1338:. -
1195:As
1011:SPA
818:in
1533:)
1447:)
1429:)
1388:)
1361:)
1346:)
1327:)
1305:.
1290:)
1256:)
1222:)
1188:)
1158:)
1124:.
1116:,
1102:).
1070:.
1039:)
1017:.
1002:)
956:)
927:--
911:.
896:)
845:)
782:)
640:.
479:.
446:•
442:•
433:•
424:•
420:•
398:•
394:•
384:•
375:•
371:•
362:•
338:•
334:•
325:•
316:•
307:•
303:•
294:•
266:•
262:•
253:•
249:•
245:•
236:•
232:•
223:•
211:•
202:•
198:•
189:•
162:•
129:•
119:•
115:•
86:)
1529:(
1514:[
1493:.
1443:(
1425:(
1384:(
1357:(
1342:(
1323:(
1286:(
1252:(
1218:(
1184:(
1154:(
1035:(
998:(
952:(
933:N
892:(
841:(
795:N
778:(
654:N
617:N
530:?
523:?
516:?
485:)
481:(
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
