203:
says, "*bing!* You'll be at Jamie's in two hours!" Now, of course, knowing that result, it would be easy to just ignore it (even if you really were planning on going to Jamie's then). The problem with the argument, though, and the reason it doesn't support or deny free will (as I see it, anyway) is because your
Laplace Machine didn't take into account its own prediction when calculating all influences on you and therefore was a flawed machine to begin with. Nor could a (real) Laplace Machine ever do so, as it would require infinite storage space to store information on itself which stored information on itself etc. etc. (which I think someone on the Laplace's demon page mentioned). This is a fascinating topic to me and I just thought I'd drop by and give you my $ 0.02.
252:
wouldn't and would have already taken into account that decision. What some people do not do is take into account that the machine itself is part of the
Causality of events discussed in the determinism theory and its interference would already be accounted for as it telling people would bring about certain events that in turn would cause another set of events. I am not sure i am communicating my point clearly... I would like to say thanks for the compliment on my page, that is unless there was sarcasm involved which i don't think that is the case since you seem nice enough. --Cloudblazer
412:
293:
159:
Your interest in personal growth suggests that you might be an
Idealist (NF), but only you can say for sure. Idealists are guided by their ethics first and foremost. That's not to say that they're more ethical than other types; but Idealists base their ideas of right and wrong on their own personal
220:
hello 138.69.160.1. thanks for dropping in your two cents! it is really a surprise to me. the problem though, with the machine you are describing, is, as you know, that it is fundamentally flawed. like you said, it may well be that such a machine cannot exist. still, both of us are left perplexed in
155:
I also consider myself to be quite pragmatic, even though I'm a
Feeling type. The two aren't mutually exclusive. For instance, when solving a problem involving people, an approach won't work if human factors aren't taken into account. One of the arguments currently being made about the bailout of
151:
Hi
Twipley, I got your message on my talk page. In an educational (or business) environment, where logic is often valued above human concerns, people with a preference for Feeling may well favor their Thinking function while in that environment. To understand whether your preference is for Thinking
202:
pages, RE: what would happen if
Laplace's theoretical computer told you where you'd be in two hours and why couldn't you just go to the movies instead? The way I see it is: Laplace's Machine takes in all data about you and the influences on you and all that at a molecular level, right, and then it
251:
I have to disagree with the previous statement that a machine could not take into account its own prediction. If it was a powerful machine too begin with it wouldn't require infinite space to store the information. IT would know that by telling you the prediction that you would change your mind or
170:
It's important to understand that preference isn't an indication of ability. Moreover, a strong preference for one function over another doesn't indicate a lack of balance. In Myers-Briggs terms, balance comes from a strong auxiliary function supporting the dominant function, not from achieiving
115:
talk page for abandoning the practice of capitalizing the cognitive functions. The official MBTI publications don't do it. Until then, however, I'd prefer to continue using "iNtuition" rather than changing it to lowercase, for consistency with the other functions. Then, I'll go through and change
266:
The editors who have visited this page don't understand spirituality and they have tagged it for deletion. i need your help urgently. so they are trying to compare it with other biographies in the field of sports etc. As you know,the field the spirituality is not very commercial. so I am having a
174:
If you're an introvert, and you feel like you could benefit from, say, joining
Toastmasters to improve your public speaking ability, that's great. Nevertheless, an introvert is always going to feel drained by that activity and need some down time to recharge afterward. The point isn't to become
383:
You seem to be at least as much as an expert on cassava as I am. Be bold, and edit it like you are feeling it. I never ate the dish, so it tells a lot. I threw the vegetable away since I did not know if the one I bought was edible or not. You cannot go wrong with your edit, if you want my own
337:
Hello, I made some changes today to the Wiki article on cassava. One change was to add this sentence in parentheses in the introductory paragraph, right after the sentence, "It is classified as sweet or bitter, depending on the level of toxic cyanogenic glucosides."
350:
This contradicts a sentence that you tailored earlier about bitterness later in the text, in the "Food uses preparation and toxicity" section. I didn't want to disturb your writing, but it would be good to clarify what looks like inconsistent information.
424:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
156:
the
American auto industry is that people won't buy cars from a company that's filed for bankruptcy. So even if Chapter 11 bankruptcy would be the best solution from a logical standpoint, the mindset of consumers also has to be considered.
171:
neutrality on the scales. So if you're an INFP, that means balance would come from having a well-developed extraverted intuition (gathering information) to support your dominant introverted feeling (in making decisions).
163:
If you haven't taken the Jung typology test at the HumanMetrics website, you might want to give it a try. I've known INFPs to test as INFJs in this test, but otherwise it seems to be pretty good. Here's the link:
452:
354:
Perhaps you could take a look at my referenced source, check it against yours, make a decision what is more accurate to say, and change the article accordingly. (And please send me a note when you do.)
230:
that being said, this is a most fascinating topic to me as well. i am so pleased you have come here to share your views on this. next, bring me that demon, so we can begin to investigate even closer. :)
436:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
263:
Hi, I have found your usernames on articles related to advaita. I need your help and suggestion. I am trying to add an article on one of the Living spiritual teacher. but,I am facing an problem.
160:
values, not the laws of society (as
Guardians normally do) or on what would have the best outcome from a pragmatic standpoint (as Rationals or Artisans might). Does that make sense?
175:
someone you're not, but to understand and accept yourself the way you are. Some things will naturally come easily to you, and some things won't. And that's okay.
43:
then, we'd need a metawikipedia discussion page. and about the accusation of impoliteness, I'd urge you to readjust your glasses, my friend.
466:
87:
No, that's okay and I take it, it's just the "impolite" word that struck me. Don't get me wrong, my meaning was empathy, not impoliteness.
204:
24:
Please try to keep your talk page comments polite and to the point (i.e. focussed on improving the article). Thanks in advance.
462:
445:
457:
362:
285:
271:
324:
305:
208:
433:
180:
121:
358:
281:
62:
25:
420:
402:
318:
313:
429:
195:
176:
117:
444:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
441:
301:
221:
front of the lifted paradox. at least, i now know that that i am not alone in my boat!
437:
385:
297:
132:
88:
44:
411:
165:
267:
hard time convincing them. could you please help and and take a look at article.
61:
Sorry. That wasn't meant as an accusation but a bit of helpful advice. Regards,
199:
296:
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Knowledge. Your test on the page
309:
212:
111:
Thanks for the compliment, Twipley. I'm trying to build consensus on the
131:
oh, it's all yours. ;) didn't realize someone already was on the case...
448:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
292:
272:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Francis_Lucille
470:
393:
366:
327:
184:
152:
or Feeling, it helps to also look at your personal relationships.
140:
125:
96:
74:
52:
37:
268:
112:
451:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
194:
Twipley! This is in response to the comments you left on the
344:(However, bitter taste is not always a reliable measure.)"
312:. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
432:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
116:all the functions to lowercase at the same time.
107:Capitalization of iNtuition in the MBTI articles
166:http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp
8:
269:http://en.wikipedia.org/Francis_Lucille
304:or removed. Please take a look at the
7:
421:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
308:to learn more about contributing to
14:
410:
291:
418:Hello, Twipley. Voting in the
1:
471:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
434:Knowledge arbitration process
97:04:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
75:02:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
53:01:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
38:23:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
213:16:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
185:23:29, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
141:01:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
126:00:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
455:and submit your choices on
328:23:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
147:Cooperative vs. Utilitarian
488:
463:MediaWiki message delivery
453:the candidates' statements
277:Appreciate all your help.
394:00:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
367:19:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
389:
384:opinion. See you later.
300:worked, and it has been
136:
92:
48:
430:Arbitration Committee
403:ArbCom Elections 2016
189:
316:instead. Thank you.
20:September 11 attacks
446:arbitration policy
405:: Voting now open!
310:this encyclopedia
71:
67:
34:
30:
479:
414:
374:Hello Reverence.
322:
295:
72:
69:
65:
35:
32:
28:
487:
486:
482:
481:
480:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
458:the voting page
415:
407:
359:Reverence Still
335:
320:
261:
259:Francis Lucille
196:Laplace's demon
192:
190:Laplace's Demon
149:
109:
63:
26:
22:
12:
11:
5:
485:
483:
416:
409:
408:
406:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
378:
377:
376:
375:
356:
348:
347:
346:
345:
334:
331:
282:Amarhindustani
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
234:
233:
232:
231:
225:
224:
223:
222:
191:
188:
148:
145:
144:
143:
108:
105:
104:
103:
102:
101:
100:
99:
80:
79:
78:
77:
56:
55:
21:
18:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
484:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
454:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
423:
422:
413:
404:
401:
395:
391:
387:
382:
381:
380:
379:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
352:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
332:
330:
329:
326:
325:
323:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
294:
289:
287:
283:
278:
275:
273:
270:
264:
258:
250:
249:
248:
247:
241:
238:
237:
236:
235:
229:
228:
227:
226:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
201:
197:
187:
186:
182:
178:
172:
168:
167:
161:
157:
153:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
129:
128:
127:
123:
119:
114:
106:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
84:
83:
82:
81:
76:
73:
60:
59:
58:
57:
54:
50:
46:
42:
41:
40:
39:
36:
19:
17:
456:
450:
427:
419:
417:
353:
349:
336:
317:
306:welcome page
298:Walt Whitman
290:
279:
276:
265:
262:
239:your friend,
205:138.69.160.1
193:
173:
169:
162:
158:
154:
150:
110:
23:
15:
200:Determinism
177:ThreeOfCups
118:ThreeOfCups
442:topic bans
438:site bans
357:Thanks!
321:itsJamie
302:reverted
66:HEFFIELD
29:HEFFIELD
386:Twipley
333:Cassava
314:sandbox
280:Thanks
242:twipley
133:Twipley
89:Twipley
45:Twipley
467:talk
428:The
390:talk
363:talk
319:OhNo
286:talk
209:talk
198:and
181:talk
137:talk
122:talk
113:MBTI
93:talk
70:TEEL
49:talk
33:TEEL
469:)
461:.
440:,
392:)
365:)
288:)
274:.
211:)
183:)
139:)
124:)
95:)
51:)
465:(
388:(
361:(
284:(
207:(
179:(
135:(
120:(
91:(
68:S
64:S
47:(
31:S
27:S
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.