Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Vacosea

Source 📝

91: 58:
Yes, as neither party involved in most recent flare is resource poor if they wish to influence wikipedia content. Who knows if some of contributors involved have undeclared CoIs like a working hour job in the timezone involved that rewards them to get messages out and regard wikipedia as just another
307:
You mentioned a source was needed : Throughout Tibet's history, its Kingdoms and Chiefdoms were mostly led by devout Tibetan Buddhist practitioners (even the Mongolian chiefs). These leaders were patrons that built monasteries, retreat centers, and published dharma texts, and some fought battles in
364:
Again, why is 1955 Litang County named Litang? It is in the historic kingdom/chiefdom of Lithang. Why is Lithang Monastery also there? Because its patron/patroness led Lithang Kingdom. That's how Tibet grew since the 8th century. To separate Litang County as an entity from it name and its historic
455:
Yes - there was distinct POV added in that last unreferenced clause and the paragraph was out of context as written without it. Good catch As a result learnt that Gordon's last stand in Sudan influenced events in South China Sea area and have hopefully made a useful improvement.
349:
You need a source even if the information is accurate, which it isn't in many of your edits. If you want to bold, do that on the "Chiefdom of Litang" page or in the "History" section, not the lede of "Litang County" which would confuse users even more.
281:
So, Litang County is a relatively new entity. Dating from post-1955 or so, it does not have much name recognition, and it's spelled differently from Lithang. Users here that search for Lithang Monastery or Kingdom of Lithang are redirected to
426:. The aftermath of the first sino-french war was definitely that France did become the dominant naval power in the Parcel Islands region. As to the paper version of the reference not saying what is claimed did you obtain the full source ? 59:
blog to be influenced.... It was fascinating seeing inaccurately sourced info appear apparently before a relevant press conference, so someone might think wikipedia is influential for audience they wish to reach.
371:
I honor others contributions by adding when their edits are questionable. I even make the non-English speaking editors work intelligible for our readers. If it's obviously fabricated information, I delete.
244: 242:! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 368:
I try to contribute positively. I add missing notable information and correct errors, especially the numerous fabricated narratives which can be bold or deviously subtle.
164: 312:
is a well known example, where its later queen was a very active patroness. Lithang Monastery was built in Lithang Kingdom/Chiefdom by patrons. That's how it worked.
191: 169:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
232: 398:
Litang appears to be the modern spelling for the county. You shouldn't have three different subjects bolded in the lede of an article for only one of them.
184: 97: 78: 144: 211: 156: 151: 258:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 44:
get protected. I hope to sort the good edits from the bad ones. It will probably be a slow process due to how many there are.
160: 115: 25:
neutrality. Not sure about the underscores in file names and would not be surprised if someone elses' bot comes visiting.
138: 304:
in Chinese sources, apparently, but both are historic entities. And both should also be mentioned on the pages' lede.
119: 111: 167:
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).
100:
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OnlyNano were:
22: 126: 441:
I searched the full source. It's possible there may be other sources but this one was questioned in 2023.
289:
Therefore, it's very helpful to the readers to let them know that the information they're looking for on
254: 461: 431: 389: 339: 64: 30: 278:
Hi. It seems you might be moving to an unnecessary 'edit war', which I prefer to diffuse here.
159:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 309: 423: 103: 183:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
457: 427: 385: 384:
It would be better to develop a collaborative attitude, since this is a group project.
335: 60: 26: 260: 218: 442: 399: 351: 45: 231: 90: 177: 82: 435: 381:
My knowledge of Tibetan history is wide and deep. My edits are accurate.
315:
So, please, as you can see, there's no reason to repeatedly delete the
286:(which should be renamed as Litang County) and can be easily confused. 252:
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
283: 465: 450: 407: 393: 359: 343: 264: 222: 68: 53: 34: 176:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
212:
Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors
327:
in the page's lede of the comparatively unknown place called
194:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
89: 133:
coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in
125:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
204: 196: 365:
role is unnecessary. But I've already explained this.
180:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
293:
is also on the page when it's included in the lede.
190:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
334:The point is to help users. Ok? Is all good now? 308:support of their Tibetan Buddhist teachers. The 114:. If you need help with referencing, please see 110:sources are required so that information can be 274:Litang County Lithang Monastery Lithang Kingdom 102:This submission is not adequately supported by 8: 127:qualifies for a Knowledge (XXG) article 157:guidelines on the notability of people 7: 96:Your recent article submission to 14: 230: 422:I restored your recent edit to 374:I do not go and revert edits I 245:Articles for creation help desk 198:Articles for creation help desk 1: 171:after they have been resolved 466:23:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 451:20:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 436:00:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 408:15:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 394:15:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 129:—that is, they do not show 484: 360:16:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 344:08:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 296:Additionally, the Tibetan 265:13:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 223:13:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 116:Referencing for beginners 446: 403: 355: 155:of the subject (see the 69:00:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 54:20:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 49: 35:00:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 23:Spratly Islands dispute 94: 98:Articles for Creation 93: 79:Articles for creation 417: 206:reviewer's talk page 418:Hope you don't mind 302:Chieftain of Litang 77:Your submission at 325:Kingdom of Lithang 298:Kingdom of Lithang 248:. If you have any 95: 321:Lithang Monastery 291:Lithang Monastery 271: 270: 192:untoward behavior 165:mistakes to avoid 149:sources that are 475: 310:Kingdom of Derge 263: 234: 227: 226: 221: 209: 201: 163:and learn about 104:reliable sources 483: 482: 478: 477: 476: 474: 473: 472: 424:Paracel Islands 420: 276: 267: 259: 225: 217: 203: 195: 168: 123: 87: 19: 12: 11: 5: 481: 479: 471: 470: 469: 468: 419: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 382: 379: 372: 369: 366: 300:is called the 275: 272: 269: 268: 237: 235: 216: 215: 188: 185:may be deleted 181: 161:technical help 124: 120:Citing sources 101: 88: 86: 75: 74: 73: 72: 71: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 480: 467: 463: 459: 454: 453: 452: 448: 444: 440: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 425: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 377: 373: 370: 367: 363: 362: 361: 357: 353: 348: 347: 346: 345: 341: 337: 332: 330: 329:Litang County 326: 322: 318: 313: 311: 305: 303: 299: 294: 292: 287: 285: 279: 273: 266: 262: 257: 256: 251: 247: 246: 241: 236: 233: 229: 228: 224: 220: 213: 208: 207: 200: 199: 193: 189: 186: 182: 179: 175: 174: 172: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 148: 147: 142: 141: 136: 132: 128: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 99: 92: 84: 80: 76: 70: 66: 62: 57: 56: 55: 51: 47: 43: 40:The articles 39: 38: 37: 36: 32: 28: 24: 17:Brave attempt 16: 421: 376:"don't like" 375: 333: 328: 324: 320: 316: 314: 306: 301: 297: 295: 290: 288: 280: 277: 253: 249: 243: 239: 205: 197: 170: 150: 145: 139: 134: 130: 107: 41: 20: 152:independent 131:significant 319:format on 178:Draft:NaHo 458:ChaseKiwi 428:ChaseKiwi 386:Metokpema 336:Metokpema 202:, on the 146:secondary 135:published 85:(July 26) 61:ChaseKiwi 27:ChaseKiwi 261:OnlyNano 255:Teahouse 219:OnlyNano 140:reliable 112:verified 108:Reliable 443:Vacosea 400:Vacosea 352:Vacosea 323:nor on 317:bolding 240:Vacosea 238:Hello, 210:or use 46:Vacosea 284:Litang 250:other 42:might 462:talk 447:talk 432:talk 404:talk 390:talk 356:talk 340:talk 118:and 83:NaHo 65:talk 50:talk 31:talk 21:On 464:) 449:) 434:) 406:) 392:) 358:) 342:) 331:. 173:. 143:, 137:, 106:. 81:: 67:) 52:) 33:) 460:( 445:( 430:( 402:( 388:( 378:. 354:( 338:( 214:. 187:. 122:. 63:( 48:( 29:(

Index

Spratly Islands dispute
ChaseKiwi
talk
00:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Vacosea
talk
20:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
ChaseKiwi
talk
00:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles for creation
NaHo

Articles for Creation
reliable sources
verified
Referencing for beginners
Citing sources
qualifies for a Knowledge (XXG) article
reliable
secondary
independent
guidelines on the notability of people
technical help
mistakes to avoid
Draft:NaHo
may be deleted
untoward behavior
Articles for creation help desk
reviewer's talk page

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.