User talk:Ykvach - Knowledge

564:. This species is common in European waters, and good known as Red scorpionfish. Another name, Large-scaled scorpion fish, I found in Wiki for the first time. Now in FishBase I have found the other several vernacular names, such as Orange scorpionfish, which are probably used for this species somewhere. But I have never met it. Red scorpionfish is really main vernacular name of this species, also used in FAO documentation. Therefore I would like to use it as the article title. In the discussion on the page of WikiProject I used only 1517: 615:

name for the titles of articles. Also I would like to say, that scientific names are not very "stable". There are a lot of taxonomic revisions with the further name changes, which make confused even scientists. And I am trying to put all known scientific synonyms in the articles about fishes. And sometime it is very complecated. In this view vernacular names are more stable, then scientific. If someone called the species Red scorpionfish, it will be Red scorpionfish everytime, despite it was called

1690: 4365:? Since there are no other Volnovakha Raions in Ukraine, I was wondering why you would decide to change the page name to a longer title when other Ukrainian villages are similarly disambiguated with just the Raion. Could I possibly change the name back? I think shorter titles just read better whenever possible. You didn't leave a reason for the change and I wanted to know if there was some policy reason I didn't know about. Cheers! 1597: 3920: 4124: 4036: 3830: 3632: 3544: 3469: 3396: 3337: 3265: 105: 3758: 37: 1651:

specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Knowledge articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Knowledge in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this

1808: 1264: 193: 164: 476:. FishBase uses one vernacular name, which is most commonly used in scientific literature. Actually, in ichthiological scientific publication one of the rule is to use the vernacular and scientific names of fishes according to FishBase. My opionion is in the mentioned cases better to use vernacular names. -- 3146:

Would you please stop moving pages on cities on territories not controlled by Ukraine without discussion. Ukraine does not control them, the new names are not locally recognized, and moves are therefore controvercial. These cities juct can not be moved without discussion. If you continue, blocks will

1608:

until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Knowledge about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate

706:

Please give me the link to your quoted guideline: "...1(i) The species has a single common name that is widely used and never used for any other species. While the species in question may have additional common names, those names are rarely used. Example: Greenland halibut...." I can't find it. I can

471:

Hallo! I have moved these articles about scorpionfishes to vernaculare names according the rules of Wiki. As mentioned: Use the common name for any species that satisfies at least one of the following criteria: 1(i) The species has a single common name that is widely used and never used for any other

1285:

is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us

330:

Hmm, maybe some reference supporting the common name as being very common or no other ones being used? To be honest, I'm not sure what would qualify either, unless there really are multiple common names being used for one species, but that would work to support not moving the article. I think even a

2932:

You're welcome! Yes, that might also be acceptable, but it's not quite as idiomatic as "Odessa Museum of Regional History". The ambiguity in that formulation would be whether "of Odessa" referred to its location or the region the history attaches to: the first version elegantly allows the confusion

1025:

Thank You for the message! All the information in this article is taken from the Decree of the President of Ukraine No 1, 2010 (see "Source"). Because there ia only one source, I donot think it needs to be in-line cited. In any case, this article needs to be complete. I have forgotten to mention it

614:

No, You didnot understand me... I have nothing against the scientific names. It must be used in the cases where it is necessary. But common names are more useful for many of people. If the scientific name is adequate, it must be used. Actually, this is agree with the rules of Wiki, to use the comon

3799:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

1650:

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Knowledge editors find interesting content to contribute to Knowledge. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Knowledge editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to

842:

Ah, I see. Thanks for the link. Strange place for guidelines. According to the section "Article titles", it's not really about primary sources saying what name is common. If various sources show the same name for different species, then the page ought not be moved, and a dab page/hatnote should be

345:

Sometime it is difficult to find the original reference to common name. But, we can use the rule, which is accepted by scientific journals, to use the vernacular names according to FishBase, www.fishbase.org (or any mirror). If the FishBase has no data about the verancular name of the fish, please

2894:

the idiomatic way to say "Museum of the history of Odessa Region" in English -- the region in question is implied by the location. "Odessa Museum of the Regional History", on the other hand, is not idiomatic English, and, for a native English speaker, raises the question "Odessa Museum of the

360:

Yes, whatever is currently used in scientific journals works well. Actually, FishBase uses a lot of uncommon names as common names, especially for the aquarium fish (I am a fish keeper and FishBase is my favourite species reference, so I use it often). There was a discussion about this in the

3964:

Please do not move anything. The consensus prior to February was to keep old names of thos which were not controlled by the central government. Whereas it will obviously will need to be re-evaluated once the war is over and the situation has stabilized, it does not make sense to start a new

3408:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3481:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

527:

is also regionally called red scorpionfish. Actually, I would guess that lots of species are called red scorpionfish. So, I really think renaming such articles to red rock cod and Red Scorpionfish will cause confusion. Are you confused now? I am. Scientific names avoid all that.

4272:

I am sorry to say this, but if you keep move-warring I will have to ask for a topic ban for you. All these moves are controversial and have to go through a RM. Please move them back and open individual RMs (ideally not all at once so that they could get sufficient attention).

4212:

I've noticed you are doing a lot of recategorization of towns in the Ukraise so I thought I'd check in with you about this. If you could tell me why some of these towns went from urban to rural classification, that would be helpful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.

453:

I much prefer the scientific name for the reason KittyKat states. If you have numerous sources showing a certain common name is predominantly used, fine. Otherwise, please avoid such moves. I intend on changing the above two back. Thank you for your understanding. Cheers.

737:

Don't use common names when it isn't clear what the name refers to. The name sardine is used for many different species of small oily fishes; the only appropriate thing to do is to write an article describing the attributes the species have in common under that

2049:

Hallo! Thank you! But, to be true, I have taken the list from the German wiki. But it consists a lot of mistakes, so I have corrected some of them. Now I plan to finish this work, to correct all the mistakes and present the list as a table (same as the

3277:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

365:. This is one of the reasons I personally support use of scientific names for species pages: common names are different in various parts of the world and change over short periods of time, while scientific names are the same everywhere. 3036:. What you try to sell us as sources is not accepted in the English Knowledge as reliable sources. If you are unhappy with this, please start discussion at the talk page of the article. Additionally, your edits clearly represent 379:

You said below that FishBase uses the common names used in scientific papers, if this is the case, then I have to go back on what I said previously because many of these names are only common for a very small number of people!

408:

Regardless, to me this means that the common names used in scientific papers are not suitable as they are not actually common, as the names on FishBase (in my experience of tropical aquarium fish) are often not commonly used.

4404:

I am not sure now, do you think you would be moving articles, and someone else would come and add sources that the localities have been actually renamed? Please add them yourself, otherwise this is disruptive editing.

2933:

to be elided in a way that the English reader would understand without needing to think about it: that the museum is in Odessa (from word ordering) and that the region in question was the region containing Odessa. --

890:

According to the WoRMS... It have much more mistakes, then FishBase (this one also has mistakes). I can say it as ichthyologist and found some mistakes related to my work. Another database related to marine life is

3107:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4169: 4081: 3873: 3675: 3587: 3509: 3436: 3305: 227:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Knowledge must require all contributors to understand and comply with its

1441:

photo and had not gotten back to add an image there. Would you be interested in joining WikiProject Bivalvia? This is a new project. We could use another knowledgeable and interested person. Check it

1663: 1131:, which contains only a list of species that is already contained on Amphiprioninae. Ykvach, if you start a discussion on this subject to make sure the move stays, please let me know as I support it. 4153:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4065:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3857:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3659:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3571:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3493:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3420:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3289:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3726:

for the existing criteria for speedy deletion. Whether you are using CSD, PROD or AFD, you need to indicate why a page should be deleted. If you still have questions, I encourage you to ask at

3722:

You've been an editor on Knowledge for quite a while but I need to remind you that you can't simply put {{db}} on a page and have it deleted. You have to have a valid reason. Please review

56:, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of 4138: 4050: 3843: 3645: 3557: 3348: 2351: 1527:

A big Welcome to WikiProject Bivalves for you, a new member! We are a new WikiProject, small but mighty and we look forward to working with you to improve coverage of the bivalves.

316:

Hi! Thank You for the message! At this time I have no idea what should be necessary to add. The guidelines look very logical. But if I will have any idea, I will add it! Yours --

2349:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 3936: 2405: 1666:. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed! 768:

Please tell me which species red scorpionfish is? I see at least two species called that. Are you saying we should pick one, and make a disambiguation page for the other(s)?

2401: 346:

use the scientific name, or add the reference (because in some cases the FishBase has not the full data about some species!). Would it be OK to add as a rule for Wiki? --

3191: 1881: 1457:

Thank You! Sorry for Mya! It was my mistake :) I will participate in the project. I have already made some corrections in the pages about Mytilids. The pages about

259:

Thank You! Sorry, I really used the text from the mentioned site. Now I have changed the information in the article. I think it should be OK, please check it... --

142:

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

21:

I'll leave these articles to you. If you need help to move an article over an existing name (such as a redirect) for some reason, leave a note on my talk page. --

2304: 119:

text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from

3781: 3777: 1877: 2300: 1419: 2120: 4362: 362: 2116: 2189:

I am trying to duplicate this economic report for all 196 countries. Would you be willing to contribute by duplicating this model for another country?

4327: 3002: 2858: 2813: 2768: 2715: 2636: 2595: 2550: 2389: 2314: 2261: 2130: 2002: 1865: 173: 49: 1179:, so the name is clear. Please make changes according your ideas, I will be in expedition for several weeks and cannot discuss, sorry. Thank You! -- 1992: 277: 249: 3747: 1552:

Hallo! I'm sorry, all the pics of this species I have are already uploaded on Commons. I agree with your edit, the pic now is better! Regards--

132: 2251: 1988: 4323: 2998: 2854: 2809: 2764: 2711: 2632: 2591: 2546: 2385: 2310: 2257: 2126: 1998: 1861: 1155:

as genus. Last one might describe the main characteristics of the genus. I just wanted to make it as stub to describe it later. If you think

4192: 4104: 3896: 3697: 3609: 3523: 3450: 3319: 3132: 2247: 3941: 3785: 2356: 1739: 1370: 3773: 3344: 843:

considered. A google search should determine which are appropriate candidates. I looked at your other page moves, and they seem fine.

558:

lives in Australia, I have never seen it, and I cannot discuss about what name is most common for this species. But I disagree about

2884: 1707: 1403: 1311: 999:--However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article does not contain in-line citations, and so doesn't follow 511: 120: 2625:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2378:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1854:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1614: 1492: 268:

It is OK now. Please, respect Knowledge rules, your user talk page is full of copyvio warnings. Thanks for your understanding. --

4238:. Now we are providing the necessary changes in the Ukrainian wiki, but I have started the change it also in the English one -- 4188: 4100: 3892: 3693: 3605: 3519: 3446: 3315: 3128: 2080: 1610: 4230:

Hello! The towns in Ukraine had official name "urban-type settlement" (from the Soviet times). But now they have got the name

2307:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2254:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2123:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1995:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2995:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2851:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2806:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2761:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2708:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2629:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2588:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2543:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2382:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1858:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1829: 213: 996: 2397: 2051: 2034: 2028: 3069:

Next time, please try to minimize the reaction time. May be if you have asked my within a week, I could provide a link.--

1487:

Cool! Go to the project page and add yourself to the list. Welcome aboard!!! There is a lot of work to be done as the

4162: 4074: 3866: 3668: 3580: 3502: 3429: 3298: 3229: 2345: 1410:, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at 785: 298: 295: 3796: 3765: 3751: 3119:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

294:

Hi, can you please add reasoning to the relevant talk pages for moving articles to use the fish's common names, as per

4358: 4235: 4174: 4086: 3926: 3911: 3878: 3680: 3592: 3514: 3441: 3310: 3124: 1622: 1618: 1396: 1332: 995:

Hey Ykvach, I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article

187:

If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to

3340: 1145:

Hallo friends! I think, it is nevermind how to call the articles, but we might to make two defferent articles: about

273: 245: 86:

Thank You! OK, I will change the text using the information from the mentioned sourses, but changing the sentences.

4252:

Indeed, urban-type settlement were deprecated in Ukraine in January, we are now doing the changed reflecting this.

3801: 1735: 498:

Hello. I see. According to the rules of Wiki, you shouldn't have moved them in the first place. The reason is that

1828:

Barnstar is awarded to you Ykvach, in recognition of your 2012 work on the subject of bivalve mollusks as part of

2746: 237: 209: 144: 128: 67: 3930:

has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

3931: 2626: 2379: 1855: 1718: 1696: 1689: 948: 881: 773: 605: 533: 472:

species. While the species in question may have additional common names, those names are rarely used. Example:

459: 3225: 2987:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2843:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2798:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2745:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2700:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2580:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2535:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2291:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2238:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2160:

Hi, and thanks for your work. Please note that we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms. Cheers.

2107:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1979:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1743: 513: 2581: 2218:

I am not sure I can help you, because I am not an economist, and understand in economy very bad... Sorry! --

1873: 1625:

page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation!

1605: 639:. And despite, someone will probable describe it with any new scientific name, it will be Red scorpionfish! 22: 3176:

No, we had a discussion for non-controversial RM's (and those cities were moved), but not for these ones.--

1290:

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.

2292: 2193: 1630: 1310:

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see

1004: 76: 64:

such as sentences or images. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators

600:

Hello my friend. I must say that I don't quite understand why you don't like the scientific names? Best,

269: 241: 180:

If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at

4150: 4062: 3934:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

3854: 3656: 3568: 3490: 3417: 3379: 3286: 2208: 1674: 1424:

This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature.

1402:

Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at

1365: 1315: 1516: 3375: 1567:

Thank You! But I think the previous version was also good. Could you, please, upload both versions? --

4373: 4317: 4308:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3040:. If you continue reverting, your account may be blocked from editing. Thank you for understanding.-- 2799: 1749: 1059: 517: 500: 229: 116: 53: 45: 4438: 4410: 4395: 4278: 4257: 3999: 3970: 3371: 3199: 3181: 3152: 3120: 3074: 3045: 2966: 2938: 2904: 2108: 1837: 1714: 1557: 944: 877: 769: 601: 554: 544: 529: 506: 455: 438: 4309: 3727: 3356: 2488: 1538: 1500: 1447: 1350: 1234: 1202: 1136: 1015: 414: 385: 370: 336: 306: 4390:, which, even though it does not have official status, has always been followed by all parties. 4357:

Hello Ykvach, and I hope you are well 🙂 I was curious about why you decided to rename the page

1491:

has not been touched much for years. We have got the higher level taxonomy up to date with the

1293:

If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

121:

http://www.ecomare.nl/en/ecomare-encyclopedie/regions/north-sea/southern-north-sea/voordelta-e/

4387: 4343: 4132: 4044: 3837: 3639: 3551: 3477: 3404: 3273: 3255: 3096: 3087: 3018: 2874: 2829: 2784: 2731: 2686: 2611: 2566: 2536: 2521: 2330: 2277: 2146: 2070: 2039: 2018: 1965: 1626: 1286:

in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

736: 473: 72: 2054:, which is really good done). So, now it is just a draft... but useful draft. Best wishes. -- 4181: 4146: 4093: 4058: 3949: 3885: 3850: 3687: 3652: 3599: 3564: 3486: 3413: 3282: 3116: 3100: 2844: 2364: 2204: 1670: 1176: 1086: 797: 566: 560: 523: 447: 4161:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4073:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3865:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3667:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3579:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3501:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3428:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3297:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3115:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1418:

regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at

139:

has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

4366: 3219: 2168: 1340: 1055: 41: 4017: 943:

I'm not quite sure what you mean? Which is more complete? Which has more mistakes? Best,

4320:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2899:?" If you are going to translate names, please use the correct local idiomatic form. -- 4434: 4406: 4391: 4274: 4253: 4158: 4070: 3995: 3966: 3862: 3664: 3576: 3498: 3425: 3294: 3195: 3177: 3148: 3112: 3104: 3070: 3041: 2988: 2962: 2934: 2900: 2456: 1980: 1908: 1833: 1773: 1596: 1553: 1411: 1407: 1226: 1194: 1160: 1146: 1124: 1090: 1051: 331:"moved in accordance with WikiProject Fishes guidelines" might be better than nothing. 218: 181: 155: 1659:

to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

203: 4334: