368:"). This is an idea where a large amount of universes are located in "the Landscape"; he expands by communicating that each universe has different physics laws that govern each of them, as can be seen in the quote above. The anthropic principle is also present in the idea. He claims, for example, that we are only here because our universe has the precise set of laws of physics that it has, and that very few universes have the laws of physics needed for intelligent life.
355:, who mentions it in his essay. The anthropic principle claims that the universe is the way it is because if it was not specifically like how we see it, we would not be here to describe it. Leonard Susskind expands by talking about the idea that the anthropic principle can be seen as a threat to the mentality that every law governing the cosmos is set in stone; thus being unalterable.
192:, where thinkers in several areas post and discuss their ideas. This collection of responses forms the entirety of the book (possibly with some excluded because of the great number of posts). The basic concept behind the book is "to gather a hundred of the most brilliant minds in the world in a room, lock them in, and have them ask each other the questions they were asking themselves".
24:
220:
People answered to this question in entries, some of which lasted several pages. These entries were posted in the Edge community forum. The ideas which were best expressed on the forum were posted in the book, organized according to subject. These ideas cover topics in physics, biology, religion, and
204:
The history of science is replete with discoveries that were considered socially, morally, or emotionally dangerous in their time; the
Copernican and Darwinian revolutions are the most obvious. What is your dangerous idea? An idea you think about (not necessarily one you originated) that is dangerous
284:
In contrast , the widespread rejection of the soul would have profound moral and legal consequences. It would also require people to rethink what happens when they die, and give up the idea (held by some 90 percent of
Americans) that their souls will survive the death of their bodies and ascend to
333:
The origin of life would be a natural (and perhaps frequent) result of the physical laws that govern the universe. This latter thought falls directly in line with the idea of cosmic evolution, which asserts that events since the Big Bang have moved almost inevitably in the direction of life. No
402:
The joy in this book is that it is easy to understand. Science duffer that I am, I had no difficulty with any of the concepts or theories. The Edge contributors really had exceeded their game. These ideas don't challenge the reader to understand them; they challenge the reader to think about
415:
The result is definitely a "dessert island book" -- one you would choose if marooned on an island -- because most of the short answers provoke enough speculation and wonderment in your own mind to last a lifetime. You would take it for the same reasons you'd take
Shakespeare -- beauty and
359:
What further worries many physicists is that the landscape may be so rich that almost anything can be found - any combination of physical constants, particle masses, and so forth. This, they fear, would eliminate the predictive power of physics. Environmental facts are nothing more than
447:
155:
334:
miracle or immense stroke of luck was needed to get it started. If this turns out to be the case, then we should expect to be successful when we search for life beyond this planet. We are not the only life that inhabits this universe. —Robert
Shapiro
384:
The conflict between religion and science is inherent and (very nearly) zero-sum. The success of science often comes at the expense of religious dogma; the maintenance of religious dogma always comes at the expense of science. —Sam Harris
424:
And so we are left with our final dangerous idea: Science's long journey down the corridors of knowledge has led us back to the realms of mystery and wonder. A method of inquiry that promised us mastery may ultimately remind us of our
468:
461:
329:. Robert Shapiro believes that the origin of life will be found in the next five years, and George Dyson believes that we do not need to understand the origin of life to make progress in molecular biology.
308:
Several authors wrote on the morals of people, consciousness, and human values. Many authors discussed how ideas themselves can be dangerous, or the idea that ideas can be dangerous. One such author,
325:
Several key ideas in biology were written about in the book, such as genetics, other life in the universe, and the origin of life. The origin of life was discussed by two authors, Robert
Shapiro and
280:. John Horgan discusses the possibility that the soul does not exist, while Paul Bloom further expands by discussing how the implication of the soul's nonexistence can have serious consequences.
316:"Dangerous" does not mean exciting or bold; it means likely to cause great harm. The most dangerous idea is the only dangerous idea: The idea that ideas can be dangerous. —Daniel Gilbert
454:
360:
environmental facts. They worry that if everything is possible, there will be no way to falsify the theory - or, more to the point, no way to confirm it. —Leonard
Susskind
552:
Note that the following topics are not all the topics in the book; these are a select few. Several of the other topics include technology, politics, and the environment.
537:
416:
universality. Shakespeare of course has on his own already expressed poetically what these thinkers say as a matter of science; but these ones cite research.
380:, in his essay titled "Science Must Destroy Religion," discusses different types of reason and belief as well as the conflict between science and religion.
398:
provides an easy-to-understand explanation of the topics covered in this book. She expands by writing that the ideas make the reader think about them.
260:, as well as many others. Not all of the contributors study the realm of philosophy or science; several contributors are also artists or writers.
756:
129:
711:
437:) could relate to how much people game. Miller states that the cause of the paradox might be that aliens become addicted to video games.
632:
273:
364:
Susskind expresses in his entry the possibility that our universe is not the only universe (also expressed in an idea labeled "The
326:
184:, which deals with "dangerous" ideas, or ideas that some people would react to in ways that suggest a disruption of morality and
828:
803:
681:
744:
430:
181:
37:
429:
Stephen Totilo, on MTV.com relates the book to gaming, in his article titled "Could Xbox
Destroy the World?" The essay by
309:
407:
The book has also been likened to "Shakespearean science" by one reviewer, due to the similar qualities it holds with
534:
813:
188:. Scientists, philosophers, artists, and various other groups of people have written in to the online salon called
23:
505:
420:
Another reviewer summarized the various ideas, concluding that science's progress may make us realize our limits.
808:
376:
Several different beliefs were mentioned in the essays such as the relationship between science and religion.
818:
277:
823:
474:
189:
168:
What Are You
Optimistic About?: Today's Leading Thinkers on Why Things Are Good and Getting Better
224:
Several of the contributors are well-known within the realm of science and philosophy. These include
408:
377:
344:
75:
719:
305:
also wrote on the idea that people are predisposed to act in certain ways because of genetics.
752:
137:
124:
773:
660:
448:
What We
Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty
156:
What We
Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty
348:
541:
294:
253:
290:
249:
233:
797:
434:
352:
237:
229:
225:
210:
689:
241:
214:
302:
257:
245:
65:
365:
55:
108:
104:
513:
469:
The Next Fifty Years: Science in the First Half of the Twenty-First Century
749:
What is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable
298:
177:
What Is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable
144:
17:
What Is Your Dangerous Idea: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable
185:
205:
not because it is assumed to be false, but because it might be true?
462:
Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement
394:
According to Jill Murphy, a reviewer of the website "The Bookbag",
285:
heaven. It is hard to get more dangerous than that. —Paul Bloom
200:
Members of the Edge Foundation were asked this question in 2006:
269:
138:
533:
The preface to the book (by Steven Pinker) can be found
783:
455:
The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution
163:
150:
136:
123:
115:
99:
91:
81:
71:
61:
51:
43:
33:
422:
413:
400:
382:
357:
331:
314:
282:
202:
654:
652:
8:
289:Another topic many entries were based on is
16:
22:
15:
618:
606:
594:
582:
570:
561:See the list of authors within the book.
492:
485:
7:
14:
510:—The Worlld Question Center 2006"
680:J. Peter Zane (8 January 2006).
433:was discussed in how its topic (
119:352 pp (first edition, hardback)
712:"Could Xbox Destroy the World?"
710:Stephen Totilo (Jan 22, 2008).
751:. New York: Harper Perennial.
209:The question was suggested by
1:
635:What is Your Dangerous Idea?
396:What is Your Dangerous Idea?
788:What Is Your Dangerous Idea
778:What Is Your Dangerous Idea
845:
637:by John Brockman (editor)"
682:"The most dangerous idea"
132:(first edition, hardback)
21:
312:, states, in his entry:
301:base of how humans act;
686:The News & Observer
661:"Shakespearean Science"
829:Books by John Brockman
804:2007 non-fiction books
427:
418:
405:
387:
362:
336:
318:
287:
207:
475:Edge Foundation, Inc.
409:William Shakespeare's
268:The existence of the
180:is a book edited by
76:Simon & Schuster
784:The Edge Foundation
722:on January 24, 2008
345:anthropic principle
18:
540:2008-08-24 at the
814:Essay anthologies
758:978-0-06-121495-0
659:Julian, Barbara.
347:was discussed by
173:
172:
130:978-0-7432-9553-6
92:Publication place
836:
809:2007 anthologies
762:
731:
730:
728:
727:
718:. Archived from
707:
701:
700:
698:
697:
688:. Archived from
677:
671:
670:
668:
667:
656:
647:
646:
644:
643:
628:
622:
616:
610:
604:
598:
592:
586:
580:
574:
568:
562:
559:
553:
550:
544:
531:
525:
524:
522:
521:
512:. Archived from
502:
496:
490:
349:Leonard Susskind
272:is discussed by
221:other subjects.
164:Followed by
151:Preceded by
140:
83:Publication date
26:
19:
844:
843:
839:
838:
837:
835:
834:
833:
794:
793:
770:
765:
759:
743:
739:
734:
725:
723:
709:
708:
704:
695:
693:
679:
678:
674:
665:
663:
658:
657:
650:
641:
639:
630:
629:
625:
619:Brockman (2007)
617:
613:
607:Brockman (2007)
605:
601:
595:Brockman (2007)
593:
589:
583:Brockman (2007)
581:
577:
571:Brockman (2007)
569:
565:
560:
556:
551:
547:
542:Wayback Machine
532:
528:
519:
517:
504:
503:
499:
495:, p. xviii
493:Brockman (2007)
491:
487:
483:
443:
435:Fermi's paradox
431:Geoffrey Miller
392:
374:
341:
323:
295:J. Craig Venter
266:
254:Richard Dawkins
198:
100:Media type
84:
29:
12:
11:
5:
842:
840:
832:
831:
826:
821:
816:
811:
806:
796:
795:
792:
791:
781:
769:
768:External links
766:
764:
763:
757:
745:Brockman, John
740:
738:
735:
733:
732:
702:
672:
648:
631:Murphy, Jill.
623:
611:
599:
587:
575:
563:
554:
545:
526:
497:
484:
482:
479:
478:
477:
472:
465:
458:
451:
442:
439:
391:
388:
373:
370:
340:
337:
322:
319:
310:Daniel Gilbert
297:discussed the
291:human behavior
265:
262:
250:Howard Gardner
234:Daniel Dennett
197:
194:
171:
170:
165:
161:
160:
152:
148:
147:
142:
134:
133:
127:
121:
120:
117:
113:
112:
101:
97:
96:
93:
89:
88:
85:
82:
79:
78:
73:
69:
68:
63:
59:
58:
53:
49:
48:
45:
41:
40:
35:
31:
30:
27:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
841:
830:
827:
825:
822:
820:
819:Science books
817:
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
801:
799:
789:
785:
782:
779:
775:
772:
771:
767:
760:
754:
750:
746:
742:
741:
736:
721:
717:
713:
706:
703:
692:on 2007-10-11
691:
687:
683:
676:
673:
662:
655:
653:
649:
638:
636:
627:
624:
621:, p. 148
620:
615:
612:
609:, p. 110
608:
603:
600:
596:
591:
588:
584:
579:
576:
572:
567:
564:
558:
555:
549:
546:
543:
539:
536:
530:
527:
516:on 2007-10-12
515:
511:
509:
501:
498:
494:
489:
486:
480:
476:
473:
471:
470:
466:
464:
463:
459:
457:
456:
452:
450:
449:
445:
444:
440:
438:
436:
432:
426:
421:
417:
412:
410:
404:
399:
397:
389:
386:
381:
379:
371:
369:
367:
361:
356:
354:
353:Carlo Rovelli
350:
346:
338:
335:
330:
328:
320:
317:
313:
311:
306:
304:
300:
296:
292:
286:
281:
279:
275:
271:
263:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:Jared Diamond
235:
231:
230:Freeman Dyson
227:
226:Steven Pinker
222:
218:
216:
212:
211:Steven Pinker
206:
201:
195:
193:
191:
187:
183:
182:John Brockman
179:
178:
169:
166:
162:
159:
157:
153:
149:
146:
143:
141:
135:
131:
128:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
95:United States
94:
90:
86:
80:
77:
74:
70:
67:
64:
60:
57:
54:
50:
46:
42:
39:
38:John Brockman
36:
32:
28:First edition
25:
20:
824:Ethics books
787:
777:
748:
724:. Retrieved
720:the original
715:
705:
694:. Retrieved
690:the original
685:
675:
664:. Retrieved
640:. Retrieved
634:
626:
614:
602:
597:, p. 68
590:
585:, p. 42
578:
566:
557:
548:
529:
518:. Retrieved
514:the original
507:
500:
488:
467:
460:
453:
446:
428:
423:
419:
414:
406:
401:
395:
393:
383:
375:
363:
358:
342:
332:
327:George Dyson
324:
315:
307:
288:
283:
267:
242:Brian Greene
223:
219:
215:psychologist
208:
203:
199:
176:
175:
174:
167:
154:
790:originates.
633:"Review of
573:, p. 6
351:as well as
303:Jerry Coyne
274:John Horgan
258:Martin Rees
246:Matt Ridley
66:Non-fiction
798:Categories
737:References
726:2008-07-08
696:2008-03-31
666:2008-03-25
642:2008-02-13
520:2007-10-08
378:Sam Harris
366:Multiverse
278:Paul Bloom
264:Psychology
56:Philosophy
109:Paperback
72:Publisher
786:, where
747:(2007).
538:Archived
481:Endnotes
441:See also
390:Response
190:the Edge
145:70986398
105:Hardback
44:Language
425:limits.
411:works.
372:Beliefs
339:Physics
321:Biology
299:genetic
103:Print (
52:Subject
47:English
774:Review
755:
256:, and
186:ethics
158:
107:&
34:Author
403:them.
196:Ideas
116:Pages
62:Genre
753:ISBN
535:here
508:Edge
343:The
276:and
270:soul
213:, a
139:OCLC
125:ISBN
87:2007
776:of
716:MTV
293:.
800::
714:.
684:.
651:^
252:,
248:,
244:,
240:,
236:,
232:,
228:,
217:.
780:.
761:.
729:.
699:.
669:.
645:.
523:.
506:"
111:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
