Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/COSCO Shipping Lines - Knowledge

Source 📝

780:). You can easily find secondary sources for COSCO Shipping Lines to verify the content. Also, there is all the history of COSCON and CSCL. Whereas COSCO Shipping Holdings (and its predecessors) is just a holding company, so it suffices to mention it in COSCO Shipping parent group. You may argue that my rationale is arbitrary. However, think of this, I cannot find enough noteworthy content to justify keeping COSCO Shipping Holdings as a separate article, which is why I agreed to your proposed merge. Also 677:, most of them are not the content for that business division, but the company history of COSCO itself (such as Singapore IPO has no context to related to the container liner business, Or those non container liner businesses wiki content. Note that the Chinese name of COSCO Shipping Lines 中远海运集装箱运输有限公司, 集装箱 = Container, thus flooding the article with non-liner content is not suitable, the right place may be 894:
it looks like there were citations for the sentences "rapidly grew its fleet..." (third-party sources, to be fair) and "In 1964, China Ocean Shipping Co..." (the company's English about page). Disregarding questions of whether novelly translated material is in itself a copyright violation in the
685:
by close paraphrased from the company version. Also, people seldom add "Awards" section in company article with non-notable award, or putting full address of the company into the article (which itself a close paraphrase of company version of the history in their webpage). Thus, chopping all
889:
per the agreement evidently reached above. I think it's noteworthy but am not sure of the need for a separate article, unless the parent one becomes too unwieldly. I am also not sure of the copyvio issue; while I agree to content does appear similar, in previous forms of the article (e.g.
516:
small portion of the article. Most of those sentences cannot be excluded or rephrased because they are direct quotations of the company's business ideology. One of the sentences mentioned by the nominator is a location address, so absolutely it will match with the corporate webpage.
948:. I'll just point out that the article has changed radically since it was first nominated. I edited it to see if I could rescue it, eliminating some of the issues the nominator pointed out, and found that the offending passages had been rewritten or removed. 716:
logic, but it is totally fine to place the content of parent company and subsidiary together if they basically have the same main business (unless you argue parent company is a holding company that have no business). For example, we only has one article for
323:
https://dupdet.toolforge.org/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCOSCO_Shipping_Lines&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fen.coscoshipping.com%2Fcol%2Fcol6922%2Findex.html&minwords=3&minchars=13&removequotations=&removenumbers=
507:
is obviously a very well-written article and contains plenty of reliable, secondary sources. The nominator's rationale that it is "copyvio" is not entirely true. There are sentences that convey information from the corporate webpage, but the syntax
201: 926:
pages will become even more tangled if we start to conflate the two issues. In any case, COSCO SHIPPING Lines is, as the article says, the world's third largest container shipping company and independently meets
247:
1964年4月1日,中远公司的第二个分公司上海远洋运输分公司(以下简称上海分公司)宣告成立,成立时的旧址在上海市中山东一路5号,= In 1964, China Ocean Shipping Co. established a second subsidiary, Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co. at No. 5 Zhongshan East No.1 Road in Shanghai
416: 162: 195: 333: 686:
unrelated, or copyvio, or promotional content. The article has not enough content at all and may be all page history need to be hidden due to copyvio cleanup process.
397: 244:
e.g. 从此,中远开始了国有企业“贷款买船,赢利还贷”的发展模式,自力更生发展远洋船队。 = rapidly grew its fleet using the business philosophy of “Buying Ships with Bank Loans and Returning Loans with Profits
435: 109: 334:
https://iw.toolforge.org/copyvios?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=COSCO_Shipping_Lines&url=http://en.coscoshipping.com/col/col6922/index.html
94: 135: 130: 139: 906: 122: 776:
My rationale to keep COSCO Shipping Lines is that it has a substantial business operation with several details and history (thereby passing
918:. The nominator hasn't stated a proper rationale for bringing the AFD nomination. One should take suspected copyright violations to 258:
In 1993, COSCO Group listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange, becoming the first Chinese SOE to be listed on a foreign capital market
375:
That a small portion is "Similar" does not mean anything. Definitely does not justify deleting an entire perfectly fine article. –
216: 183: 89: 82: 17: 561:, has accused me – the creator of the nominated article – of being a paid editor. Thus, I suspect his nomination to delete 177: 103: 99: 957: 940: 910: 879: 858: 837: 805: 754: 695: 574: 546: 446: 427: 408: 384: 370: 344: 304: 286: 64: 974: 821: 713: 173: 126: 40: 709: 653: 223: 648:
is container liner (the company also has bulk carrier and port operator divisions), so this time it is not
361:'s entry as well. Not sure is it IDCH copy the old version of the company history by COSCO, or vice versa. 953: 936: 891: 656:, which is the listed company within COSCO Shipping group as the direct parent company of the liner, into 970: 538: 36: 902: 897: 831: 799: 789: 750: 691: 674: 661: 616: 608: 588: 570: 562: 542: 504: 458: 380: 366: 340: 300: 282: 266: 233: 118: 70: 726: 209: 52:. It seems that the copyvio issues have been resolved. A merger can be discussed on the talk page. 189: 919: 949: 932: 682: 649: 534: 439: 420: 401: 78: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
969:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
738: 494: 712:, a listed company, not the ocean liner division, which itself is not listed. I don't like 826: 794: 783: 746: 687: 637: 595:, which engaged in container liner. COSCO Shipping Lines' predecessor also in that field. 566: 556: 376: 362: 336: 296: 278: 274: 895:
degree that a straight copy/paste would be, the citations seem acceptable, if imperfect.
322: 870: 777: 678: 657: 645: 612: 600: 592: 550: 530: 479: 270: 55: 237: 928: 923: 817: 742: 734: 641: 472: 293: 156: 465: 533:. We cannot merge it with any other Knowledge article as there is next to zero 262:
I should not quote too much , otherwise the Afd itself would became a copyvio.
722: 931:. The article needs significant improvement but that's a separate issue. 587:
CartleR255, I really don't understand your move or rationale on articles.
537:. Also, we have plenty of articles of other COSCO Shipping subsidiaries: 255:
1993年10月5日,中远投资(新加坡)有限公司在新加坡成功上市,吹响了中远全面进军资本市场的号角,同时也成为第一家进入海外资本市场的中国国有企业
240:, written in Chinese. Some sentence structure also very very similar. 357:
One more point. The article by the company itself somewhat similar to
681:, which also created by you) , and with promotional tone that seem 730: 718: 604: 596: 251:
And here is the example from the second section of the article
965:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
236:
followed the flow of the official company history located here
861:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
486:. Numerous third-party sources have been cited. The content 673:
Moreover, your existing content in this article title,
152: 148: 144: 208: 867:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 553:?? Finally, I would like to note that this editor, 417:
list of Transportation-related deletion discussions
238:
http://www.coscoshipping.com/col/col6862/index.html
294:http://en.coscoshipping.com/col/col6922/index.html 273:, so why fork out as another article? Did it pass 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 977:). No further edits should be made to this page. 615:, but at the same time content fork by creating 434:Note: This discussion has been included in the 415:Note: This discussion has been included in the 396:Note: This discussion has been included in the 232:it seems a copyvio. The whole body paragraph of 500:The article does not contain inaccurate claims. 461:does not meet Knowledge's deletion policy: 398:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 820:which can be found on the article talk page ( 234:COSCO Shipping Lines#China Ocean Shipping Co. 222: 8: 652:? You also agreed may discussion on merging 464:The article's content is properly verified ( 110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 436:list of China-related deletion discussions 433: 414: 395: 359:International Directory of Company History 603:. So, you tried again and again to merge 549:. Why not also delete those for lack of 313:And there is the wiki tools on copyvio 565:represents a conflict of interest. – 7: 664:is the exception on overlap instead? 708:Lastly, the flagship subsidiary is 512:. Also, these sentences are only a 269:is a division and main business of 24: 644:. But since the main business of 741:is a separate article BTW) Also 95:Introduction to deletion process 525:of COSCO Shipping Group, so it 471:There is no original research ( 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 737:is not separate article (yet? 632:merit to have it own article, 488:does not reflect any marketing 478:The article is written from a 1: 911:22:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC) 880:21:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC) 838:17:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 806:15:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 755:21:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 696:21:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 575:22:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 447:21:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 428:21:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 409:21:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 385:22:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 371:21:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 345:21:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 305:21:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 287:21:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 958:17:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 941:16:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 85:(AfD)? Read these primers! 65:12:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 994: 547:COSCO Shipping Development 967:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 710:COSCO Shipping Holdings 654:COSCO Shipping Holdings 892:Special:Diff/992196646 816:Also, I have proposed 628:COSCO Shipping Lines' 599:is the predecessor of 521:, this article is the 898:WhinyTheYounger (WtY) 539:COSCO Shipping Energy 292:Here is Eng version. 83:Articles for deletion 675:COSCO Shipping Lines 662:COSCO Shipping Lines 617:COSCO Shipping Lines 609:China Shipping Group 589:COSCO Shipping Lines 563:COSCO Shipping Lines 543:COSCO Shipping Ports 505:COSCO Shipping Lines 493:There is no vanity ( 490:of the organization. 459:COSCO Shipping Lines 267:COSCO Shipping Lines 265:Apart from copyvio. 119:COSCO Shipping Lines 71:COSCO Shipping Lines 591:, is a division of 523:flagship subsidiary 792:for more details. 714:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST 882: 878: 497:) in the article. 475:) in the article. 449: 430: 411: 100:Guide to deletion 90:How to contribute 63: 985: 900: 877: 875: 868: 866: 864: 862: 836: 834: 829: 804: 802: 797: 787: 739:Swire Properties 560: 519:Most importantly 510:is not identical 444: 425: 406: 227: 226: 212: 160: 142: 80: 62: 60: 53: 34: 993: 992: 988: 987: 986: 984: 983: 982: 981: 975:deletion review 896: 883: 871: 869: 857: 855: 832: 827: 825: 800: 795: 793: 781: 554: 484:free of puffery 440: 421: 402: 169: 133: 117: 114: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 991: 989: 980: 979: 961: 960: 943: 913: 865: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 809: 808: 790:your talk page 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 727:Geely Holdings 701: 700: 699: 698: 679:COSCO Shipping 668: 667: 666: 665: 660:Group, so why 658:COSCO Shipping 646:COSCO Shipping 623: 622: 621: 620: 613:COSCO Shipping 601:COSCO Shipping 593:COSCO Shipping 579: 578: 502: 501: 498: 491: 476: 469: 451: 450: 431: 412: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 350: 349: 348: 347: 328: 327: 326: 325: 317: 316: 315: 314: 308: 307: 271:COSCO Shipping 260: 259: 256: 249: 248: 245: 230: 229: 166: 113: 112: 107: 97: 92: 75: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 990: 978: 976: 972: 968: 963: 962: 959: 955: 951: 947: 944: 942: 938: 934: 930: 925: 921: 917: 914: 912: 908: 904: 899: 893: 888: 885: 884: 881: 876: 874: 863: 860: 839: 835: 830: 823: 819: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 807: 803: 798: 791: 788:please visit 785: 779: 775: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 756: 752: 748: 744: 743:Emperor Group 740: 736: 735:Swire Pacific 732: 728: 724: 720: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 697: 693: 689: 684: 680: 676: 672: 671: 670: 669: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 626: 625: 624: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 583: 582: 581: 580: 577: 576: 572: 568: 564: 558: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 515: 511: 506: 499: 496: 492: 489: 485: 481: 477: 474: 470: 467: 463: 462: 460: 456: 453: 452: 448: 445: 443: 437: 432: 429: 426: 424: 418: 413: 410: 407: 405: 399: 394: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 346: 342: 338: 335: 332: 331: 330: 329: 324: 321: 320: 319: 318: 312: 311: 310: 309: 306: 302: 298: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 257: 254: 253: 252: 246: 243: 242: 241: 239: 235: 225: 221: 218: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 175: 172: 171:Find sources: 167: 164: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 137: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 111: 108: 105: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 86: 84: 79: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 966: 964: 950:Fiachra10003 945: 933:Fiachra10003 915: 886: 872: 856: 773: 633: 629: 584: 526: 522: 518: 513: 509: 503: 487: 483: 454: 442:CAPTAIN RAJU 441: 423:CAPTAIN RAJU 422: 404:CAPTAIN RAJU 403: 358: 264: 261: 250: 231: 219: 213: 205: 198: 192: 186: 180: 170: 76: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 920:WP:COPYPROB 721:instead of 527:undoubtedly 196:free images 873:Sandstein 784:Matthew hk 747:Matthew hk 723:Geely Auto 688:Matthew hk 683:WP:COPYVIO 650:WP:overlap 567:CartleR255 557:Matthew hk 535:WP:Overlap 377:CartleR255 363:Matthew hk 337:Matthew hk 297:Matthew hk 279:Matthew hk 58:Sandstein 971:talk page 495:WP:VANITY 37:talk page 973:or in a 922:and the 907:contribs 859:Relisted 638:WP:NCORP 636:it pass 275:WP:NCORP 163:View log 104:glossary 39:or in a 946:Comment 778:WP:CORP 774:Comment 640:and/or 585:Comment 551:WP:CORP 531:WP:CORP 482:and is 480:WP:NPOV 202:WP refs 190:scholar 136:protect 131:history 81:New to 929:WP:GNG 924:WP:AFD 828:Cartle 818:WP:ATD 796:Cartle 642:WP:GNG 529:meets 473:WP:NOR 174:Google 140:delete 887:Merge 731:Swire 729:. Or 719:Geely 611:into 605:COSCO 597:COSCO 217:JSTOR 178:books 157:views 149:watch 145:links 16:< 954:talk 937:talk 916:Keep 903:talk 833:R255 822:link 801:R255 751:talk 733:and 725:and 692:talk 607:and 571:talk 514:very 466:WP:V 455:Keep 381:talk 367:talk 341:talk 301:talk 283:talk 210:FENS 184:news 153:logs 127:talk 123:edit 50:keep 909:) 824:). 745:. 630:may 224:TWL 161:– ( 956:) 939:) 905:, 753:) 694:) 634:if 573:) 545:, 541:, 468:). 457:- 438:. 419:. 400:. 383:) 369:) 343:) 303:) 285:) 277:? 204:) 155:| 151:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 952:( 935:( 901:( 786:: 782:@ 749:( 690:( 619:? 569:( 559:: 555:@ 379:( 365:( 339:( 299:( 281:( 228:) 220:· 214:· 206:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 181:· 176:( 168:( 165:) 159:) 121:( 106:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sandstein
12:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
COSCO Shipping Lines

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
COSCO Shipping Lines
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.