407:. Every university has been impacted by the virus, and so much of this is routine local news covering the goings-on like any other academic institution, for which the same can be found about the school I went to. I find it silly that it would be considered encyclopedic to include content like "Students noted that the quality of meals improved as the fall semester progressed" sourced to the student newspaper. The coverage about the president at the white house is a bit tangential and this is generally overly specific. A bit like
509:. I found this article about a week ago and felt inclined to nominate it for deletion, but decided against it at the time because my initial (admittedly fleeting) reading of the article's content convinced me that the university botched the response horribly. But a closer reading of the article per Reywas92's explanation now has me convinced that the article is way too specific on a topic that would normally take one, maybe two paragraphs to explain. Any relevant content can be merged to
233:
I do not think this topic is notable enough to deserve an encyclopedic entry. Does every large instution in the world during this pandemic need a COVID-19 impact related article? The content should instead be copied and published in the local town's newspaper or this university's newsletter and this
427:
Objections to specific content does not merit deletion; if you believe that the specific content is not properly sourced, then remove it. The question for deletion is whether or not the article topic is notable. The coverage of the outbreak at Notre Dame has also been the subject of peer-reviewed
281:
The institution has received national press coverage for the various decisions it has made during the pandemic, as well as for the effects that the pandemic has had on the institution. There was unusually detailed reporting from national outlets on the activities of the
University, including
483:
That is not the consideration here. Not every thing that happens at a university that receives indepth coverage from reliable sources needs to be covered in a seperate article. Beyond this, I think all coverage of this subject per se fails the not news
202:
411:, we shouldn't have a separate article giving the minutiae of how they mixed in-person and online classes, something many other universities had to deal with and which were likewise covered in local and sometimes regional and national news.
408:
136:
131:
140:
538:. Unless the procedures taken are so fundamentally unique as to warrant independent notability (beyond what every other university has garnered for their standardized responses), an entire page is not needed.
123:
196:
366:. The topic has been the subject of coverage in its own right from many national news sources, as evidenced by the sources present and the coverage provided therefrom. These sources include CNN,
588:. While there is clearly abundance of sources, you do not see articles for every University dealing with the COVID-19 situation. A selective merging of the more important information to the
302:
covering the decision to bring students back early, and many, many more. Do you believe that the topic has not received in-depth coverage from multiple reliable sources in its own right? —
287:
127:
295:
163:
119:
71:
283:
322:
342:
217:
184:
110:
601:
572:
547:
526:
493:
478:
464:
441:
415:
391:
351:
334:
311:
269:
243:
65:
95:
178:
589:
585:
560:
510:
400:
53:
256:. If anything this may deserve a subsection in the overall article, in case this institution has done anything special. If that is not the case,
174:
432:
published by the CDC, as well as coverage by national papers (for its impact on Notre Dame's academics, student life, and its athletics).—
224:
190:
90:
83:
17:
469:
Do you believe that the topic of the article has or has not received in-depth coverage from significant reliable sources? —
556:
514:
404:
104:
100:
299:
618:
489:
460:
40:
535:
452:
253:
522:
614:
265:
36:
451:
This article is way too presentist. The scope is too narrow. At most a paragraph in the article on the
597:
485:
474:
456:
437:
387:
307:
291:
543:
330:
210:
61:
518:
239:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
613:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
568:
276:
261:
593:
470:
433:
383:
303:
429:
539:
346:
326:
57:
506:
422:
412:
379:
363:
362:
The article's topic has in-depth coverage from multiple reliable sources, satisfying
235:
157:
564:
409:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/COVID-19 pandemic in Door County, Wisconsin
286:
on Notre Dame's COVID-19 protocols, a comparative analysis written in the
563:. This is just way too detailed and full of trivial information. --
609:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
378:, among other reliable sources. This article obviously meets
290:
that contrasted Notre Dame's COVID-19 approach and that of
56:. Could also be merged elsewhere if appropriate/desired.
153:
149:
145:
209:
120:COVID-19 pandemic at the University of Notre Dame
72:COVID-19 pandemic at the University of Notre Dame
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
621:). No further edits should be made to this page.
341:Note: This discussion has been included in the
321:Note: This discussion has been included in the
298:on the topic of Notre Dame's early struggles,
323:list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions
223:
8:
343:list of Indiana-related deletion discussions
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
340:
320:
590:History of the University of Notre Dame
586:History of the University of Notre Dame
561:History of the University of Notre Dame
511:History of the University of Notre Dame
401:History of the University of Notre Dame
54:History of the University of Notre Dame
592:page would be a better alternative.
455:is merited. Not an indepdent article.
7:
24:
96:Introduction to deletion process
517:if it's deemed notable enough.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
294:, an in-depth piece from the
557:COVID-19 pandemic in Indiana
515:COVID-19 pandemic in Indiana
405:COVID-19 pandemic in Indiana
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
638:
602:16:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
573:03:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
548:03:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
527:02:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
494:13:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
479:21:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
465:20:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
442:20:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
416:18:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
392:16:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
352:11:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
335:11:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
312:21:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
270:11:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
244:10:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
66:01:26, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
611:Please do not modify it.
536:University of Notre Dame
453:University of Notre Dame
370:, The Associated Press,
254:University of Notre Dame
32:Please do not modify it.
284:The Wall Street Journal
376:The Indianapolis Star
84:Articles for deletion
292:Princeton University
382:in its own right.—
372:The Chicago Tribune
368:The New York Times
486:John Pack Lambert
457:John Pack Lambert
354:
337:
234:article deleted.
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
629:
426:
349:
280:
228:
227:
213:
161:
143:
81:
34:
637:
636:
632:
631:
630:
628:
627:
626:
625:
619:deletion review
582:Selective Merge
553:Selective Merge
420:
347:
296:Chicago Tribune
288:Washington Post
282:reporting from
274:
170:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
635:
633:
624:
623:
605:
604:
575:
550:
529:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
446:
445:
444:
394:
356:
355:
338:
317:
316:
315:
314:
231:
230:
167:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
634:
622:
620:
616:
612:
607:
606:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
528:
524:
520:
519:Love of Corey
516:
512:
508:
504:
501:
495:
491:
487:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
424:
419:
418:
417:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
395:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
357:
353:
350:
344:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
318:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
278:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
610:
608:
581:
577:
552:
531:
502:
448:
397:Delete/merge
396:
375:
374:, ABC News,
371:
367:
359:
257:
249:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
77:
49:
47:
31:
28:
277:Microhierax
262:Microhierax
197:free images
594:CPCEnjoyer
471:Mikehawk10
434:Mikehawk10
384:Mikehawk10
304:Mikehawk10
615:talk page
540:Deku link
484:criteria.
428:academic
348:Spiderone
327:Shellwood
58:Barkeep49
37:talk page
617:or in a
507:Reywas92
430:research
423:Reywas92
413:Reywas92
236:Tom (LT)
164:View log
105:glossary
39:or in a
513:and/or
203:WP refs
191:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
578:Delete
565:Rusf10
559:&
503:Delete
449:Delete
380:WP:GNG
364:WP:GNG
258:delete
175:Google
141:delete
534:with
532:Merge
252:with
250:Merge
218:JSTOR
179:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
50:merge
16:<
598:talk
569:talk
544:talk
523:talk
505:per
490:talk
475:talk
461:talk
438:talk
388:talk
360:Keep
331:talk
308:talk
266:talk
240:talk
211:FENS
185:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
62:talk
584:to
555:to
399:to
300:CNN
260:--
225:TWL
162:– (
52:to
600:)
571:)
546:)
525:)
492:)
477:)
463:)
440:)
390:)
345:.
333:)
325:.
310:)
268:)
242:)
205:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
64:)
596:(
580:/
567:(
542:(
521:(
488:(
473:(
459:(
436:(
425::
421:@
403:/
386:(
329:(
306:(
279::
275:@
264:(
238:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.